All Episodes
Previous Next
Nov. 28, 2008 - Rush Limbaugh Program
33:45
November 28, 2008, Friday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Greetings, my friends, and welcome back, Rush Limbaugh, the Excellence in Broadcasting Network.
From the bunkered and heavily fortified EIB Southern Command from behind the golden EIB microphone, it is Friday.
Live from the Southern Command in Sunny South Florida.
It's open line Friday.
Here's our telephone number, 800-282-2882.
If you want to go the email address route, you can do that.
L Rushbow at EIBNet.com.
Open line Friday.
The day of the week we turn the program over to rank amateurs, one of the most eagerly anticipated days in all of the big media week.
A courageous act of benevolence by me, benevolent dictator.
Nobody has the right to be heard on this program other than me.
Nobody has the right to speak other than me.
It has to be earned.
But on Friday, we go to the phones.
You can talk about whatever you want.
It's always fun for us.
Again, the telephone number is 800 28282.
You may remember, it seems like a long time ago now, maybe maybe a year or more, but maybe even longer than that.
Every day, ladies and gentlemen, there were headlines in the newspapers all over the country about runaway SUVs doing this, driving themselves off of the sixth floor of parking garages, running off of interstate bridges, all kinds of things running into each other, running over people, and of course the point of the headline, runaway SUV, SUV this, SUV this was part of the environmentalist wacko movement.
They were furthering the uh agenda of the Sierra Club and other environmentalist wacos, the drive by's were, but trying to portray the SUV as a deadly invention, a deadly creation on its own.
But we have been in a bit of a lull.
There haven't been such stories for quite a while.
I mean, it does seem like a year until now.
And so here's our official theme in a Yugo, Paul Shanklin.
Runaway SUV in New Zealand.
Wellington, New Zealand, a runaway SUV knocks a man off his toilet.
A Wellington, New Zealand man got the fright of his life when a runaway SUV crashed into his house and knocked him off the toilet.
The vehicle had been parked with its emergency brake only half on.
It rolled backward down a 32-foot bank into the house Thursday in the southern city of Christchurch.
According to the press newspaper, police said a building contractor working next door had parked the vehicle at the top of the bank minutes earlier.
He came back to his car.
He found it next door, basically.
The paper said that when the homeowner was asked how the builder might be feeling, the homeowner said, What about me?
I got knocked off the toilet.
I got a hell of a fright.
The man asked not to be named because he's selling the house.
He didn't want the incident to interfere with the sale.
Wow, you're gonna hide it, pal.
An SUV crashes into your house and knocks you off the toilet, and somebody's not gonna see the evidence of this.
Now see, we don't buy for a minute that this SUV just had its parking break half on.
That's not the way these stories are portrayed.
These stories are portrayed as though SUVs have minds of their own.
Very seldom, even when there are stories involving drivers of SUVs in such incidents.
Do we ever hear about the driver?
We only hear about the runaway SUV.
As though the driver is just a prisoner.
A driver is the is nothing more actually than a passenger.
In this case, this SUV had a grudge.
He either had a grudge against its owner or he had a grudge against the guy in the house that was on the toilet.
Probably this SUV, well aware of the assaults being made on it and its brothers and sisters by environmentalist wackos, was able to understand that the guy on the toilet was using too much toilet paper.
And the SUVs, they don't want to go extinct.
They don't want to be, they don't want to be drummed out of business.
They don't want to be end up in a junk lot.
And so any attention they can cause to keep environmental standards high by keeping this poor guy from using too much toilet paper.
This is the way we go to and made fun of these people.
Police said no charges would be filed in this incident because the incident occurred on private property.
And of course, how do you charge an SUV?
But be patient.
They will come up with a way.
By the way, this next is huge news.
This is really huge news.
The EPA, Environmental Protection Agency administrator, Steven Johnson, has shelved his agency's findings that greenhouse gases are a danger to the public.
This is amazing.
The EPA administrator Stephen Johnson on Thursday told Congress he will initiate a lengthy public comment period about whether such emissions are a risk before responding to a U.S. Supreme Court order.
The move means there is virtually no chance the Bush administration will act to regulate greenhouse gases in response to the High Court's decision in the time left in office.
The decision by the EPA infuriated Democrat lawmakers and attorneys who won the landmark case before the high court last spring.
Henry Waxman said this is a this a transparent delaying tactic and a major reversal of EBA's position.
Bush administration's recklessly abandoning its responsibility to address the global warming crisis.
Sierra Club attorney, David Bookminder's outrageous.
It is outrageous.
He was one of the lead attorneys on the uh on the case.
Now the spokesman for the EPA, Jonathan Schrader, countered criticism of the decision by saying, look, no matter what is shouted or screamed from the rooftops, this is truly an historic moment.
No administration's taken this step to evaluate this new pollutant.
This is a this is a courageous step.
They just, at the EPA, they just said, screw it.
We're not going to automatically accept the fact that greenhouse gases are a danger to the public.
This affects all kinds of things from mileage standards to taxes, any number of things.
Can I summarize global warming for you very simply?
We we have waxed eloquent on this program for years about global warming.
And it really is about two things.
This whole man-made global warming hoax is about two things.
Number one, it is about empowering government to run more and more of the aspects of private business and the private sector.
It is simply a trick that is designed to get government tentacles into more and more of American business in the private sector as possible.
Number two, the man-made global warming hoax is about turning carbon dioxide because it is everywhere.
We exhale it.
It's about turning carbon dioxide into gold.
For those of you in Rio de Janeiro, let me explain that.
Have you heard of carbon credits?
Have you heard of buying credits for your carbon footprint?
Your carbon footprint is everything you use electricity-wise in your home, your car, how many vacations you take on an airplane, your exhalations, and all of these things.
And the man-made global warming hoax is that says that all of those things are pollutants because carbon dioxide is a pollutant.
It is a greenhouse gas.
So any time you use any source of power or energy, you are polluting.
Including when you exhale.
And so what has to happen?
Well, we have to we we have to uh uh somehow cancel our carbon footprints.
So what do we do?
We pay companies to plant trees to make up for all that soak up all of the carbon that we are exhaling and putting into the atmosphere.
It's simply a financial scam.
It is an attempt to turn something that is as plentiful as any other thing on the planet into gold.
Into into quick cash, doing it on the basis of the guilt that they have made people feel for engaging in this ruinous to the climate and the planet behaviors.
Those are the two things.
That's really all this is about.
Expanding government, give them more control over private sector businesses, and turning carbon dioxide into gold.
Back after this.
Hey, I have a quick question.
This is sort of a it is a little bit of a trick question.
I shouldn't have said that.
I'm just curious what you people think about this.
Everybody has a cell phone, right?
A lot of people have more than one cell phone.
What are your thoughts on early cancellation fees of your contract?
For example, when um when the iPhone, the first iPhone came out, I got a bunch of them to give away to staff members.
And some of them said, I can't.
I I just I just signed a contract with T Mobile, or I just signed a contract with Verizon or whatever, and I still got like 18 months.
There's a like a hundred and seventy-five dollar cancellation fee.
That's okay.
You want to stick with that, fine.
I'll give the iPhone to somebody else.
Oh, wait a minute.
And then they started cursing the early cancellation fee.
The contract.
Every I mean, if you get an iPhone, you gotta sign a two-year contract with ATT.
If you get any cell phone, you gotta sign some sort of contract.
There was a hearing in Washington, the FCC.
The Republican controlled FCC.
The pro regulation Republican administration, FCC.
And they adopted a position that these early cancellation fees are just not fair.
Early termination fees, ETFs is what they're officially called.
Early termination fees.
They're just not fair.
They're just not right.
They just screw the customer rush.
The customer gets in, buys the phone, and then once, and then after after maybe six months wants to get out, I can't afford to without this large pay.
But wait, didn't you sign a contract?
Yes, but it's still not fair because they've got me roped into a service I don't want.
Well, no, because all these have a 30-day return policy.
You know, you can use the phone for 30 days if you don't like it.
You got 30 days to take it back, get it, get your money back, and then you're out of, you know, you're out of the contract.
You go beyond 30 days.
Right.
Right.
And when you sign the contract, right, you they may sell you a $300 phone or $200 phone for $15 or $20 or whatever, because they really want you to sign up for the service.
It's the service they want.
It ain't gonna be long before these phones are going to be free or practically free.
But at any rate, consumer activists.
Consumer activists have been lobbying the FCC only behalf of those of you who think you should not have to honor the contract that you've signed with the cellular provider that you chose.
And so the consumer activist is actually not a consumer activist.
The consumer activist is just another leftist who is using consumers ostensibly for the real purpose of expanding the regulatory power of government.
There were consumer activists at the FCC hearing yesterday.
And of course, they were whining and crying, and they were talking about predatory contractual services required by cellular companies.
And they took advantage of unwitting people.
Didn't fully tell them what they were signing.
Yes, they do, because everybody knows.
And if they don't, they find out if they try to get out of the contract, they do if there's a cancellation charge.
So one of the things proposed by the so-called consumer activists was that consumers be forced, while buying a phone, to read every page and sign every page of the contract that the can that the uh cellular service requires one signature on.
This would elongate and expand the whole process of buying a cellular phone.
And it would it people aren't gonna want to mess with this and do this.
The point the point is there are plenty of options for people who do not want to sign two-year contracts with a cell provider.
Do you know what the options are?
Well, one of the things that you can do is uh is show up and get uh you know one of these phones, what do they call track phones or virgin mobile phones at a Walmart or a 7 Eleven or something?
The pay is you go phone, And you throw it away when it's finished.
It's got a number and so forth, but there's no contract with it.
Now the carriers will offer discounts if you sign up long term.
Uh early termination fees are an efficient means of enforcing the deal.
But the point here is that the that I'm trying to make is the consumer activists who are actually they make you think they're looking out for you when they're not.
They're just it it's no more than animal rights people are just nothing but leftists trying to eliminate your freedom.
Consumer activists in large part are simply doing what they can to get the power of government more involved in every little transaction you make under the premise that every transaction you make with whatever corporation, they're out to screw you.
They're out to defa to uh defraud you and to fool you and to mistreat you and so forth and so on.
Yet they hide under this this banner here of uh of consumer activists.
And so what we end up with is more federal regulation over the simple transaction of buying a cell phone in service.
More federal regulation.
How many of you knew that there were hearings at the FCC on early termination fees?
I doubt that you knew, and if you bothered to read the New York Times today on page Z 75, you might have read about it, but the story of the New York Times doesn't New York Times story is as biased as anything else, because I know what went on at the meeting.
Here's what they wrote.
The chairman of the FCC, Kevin Martin, laid out a plan on Thursday to regulate the high fees.
Cell phone companies charge consumers for canceling their contracts early.
Mr. Martin's proposal was similar to an industry plan put forward last month.
In comments at a public meeting, Martin said he was skeptical that class action lawsuits would adequately resolve for consumers all the pending issues about these fees.
He joked that his wife, apparently unhappy about the fees, had volunteered to testify at the hearing.
He also criticized the fees himself, saying that in practice it can leave people locked into a service that they really want to leave.
They signed a contract, they've got 30 days to determine whether or not they like the service.
If you really want to leave, pay the fee.
You made a deal.
You signed a contract.
But now, see, even people, even winning this is the same thing that's happening in the mortgage lending crisis.
Predatory lenders, predatory cell phone service companies.
Screwing the little guy, not telling them what all's in the fine print.
This is not fine print stuff.
Anyway, folks, is not a then I don't want to make a mountain out of a molehill here, but it's it's a clear ex illustration, a great example of how even a Republican administration can sit around and love the notion of more regulation over virtually any kind of transaction that we might have in our daily lives.
Ha!
Welcome back, Rush Limboy here on the cutting edge.
Your guiding light to times of trouble, confusion, murkiness, tumult, chaos, lies, distortion, torture, humiliation, and even the good times.
All right, it's open line Friday.
That means back to the phones.
It's Gene in Casper, Wyoming.
Nice to have you here.
Hi, Mr. Limbaugh.
It's an honor talking to you.
Thank you.
I did this for all the right reasons, but I looked into windmill power to see if I could save myself money.
I was going to save the earth with this, okay?
And um, and it turns out that these things are expensive.
Uh I got a uh I called a burgey, which makes a lot of these windmill things.
And you know, you gotta buy the windmill, the generator, the tower, you have to install it.
you have to put the electrical line in, you have to put in a special two-way electrical meter with a power.
There might be people confused here.
Uh a windmill needs electricity and power lines for what?
Well, for my home.
I was I was going to look at this to see if I could do this at my home.
And go on.
Yes, yes, yes, but you see, most people think that the windmill produces the power, that it doesn't need any electricity attached to it.
You're talking about lines from the windmill to your house.
That's right.
That's right.
I mean, I'm saying, you know, it's not just a little bit of a window.
Well, now wait a minute.
Wait, wait a minute, but then there has to be the windmill just can't is not going to create electricity.
This doesn't work.
There has to be something in the windmill that converts the wind energy to electricity.
What is that?
That's the turbine, right?
That's right.
Right.
So the turbine's gonna be running and making a lot of turban folks is what you'll find in a jet engine.
Uh uh so you're gonna be spending how much money generating power to power the windmill.
Well well no no no the point is that and and this one to comment on the money.
If I got an estimate of fifty thousand dollars to put this thing in.
Turnkey, okay?
Uh now this isn't even getting past the fact that um I'd have to you know go to the county and get a special zoning variance um et cetera et cetera.
I'm just saying, you know Yeah wait your neighbors find out you're gonna put this thing in.
Well then what do you do did you research after you spent all this money did you research I didn't spend the money well I mean if if you would have it after you had spent the money did you research what do you do when there's no wind that day?
Well well that's one of the problems because you can maybe go off the grid two thirds of the time.
Which means that maybe after twenty five years you'll get a return on your investment of fifty thousand dollars.
But that's not the point of all this the the point of all this environmental wacko stuff is it should it's gonna it's gonna cost us a lot of money.
We deserve to pay this because we have destroyed the planet or almost and so how much it costs is irrelevant because we're saving the planet with this stuff.
Well you know maybe uh you know someone like uh Barry could do that with his one point five million dollar mansion he's got fifty thousand chicken around but uh you know I I'm just saying that you know for most folks and you know I'd like to say that you know I'm doing better than most and so I've worked at this thing but I'm saying uh you know I'm just throwing out numbers here personal question how how big is your house?
Um about uh well is it thirty four hundred square feet?
Thirty four hundred square feet.
So that's about the basement.
Counting the basement no no and the basement and the basement square feet.
All right that's that's about fifteen hundred square feet more than the hut in which George Hussein Obama lives.
Now a windmill might work for him but how many wind with some spra sprays I I mean sprays the point of baby gets some spray on DDT too but how many wind how many windmills would it need for your house?
Would one do it?
No, no I mean you know and see but the point is that it's all wind dependent it you know it's not just not enough wind but too much wind.
Because once you go above about fifty miles an hour you got to shut the windmill down or it'll just rip apart.
And you can get those kind of winds out in Wyoming.
Easily easily I mean you know we've clock stuff at our house uh at seventy plus miles an hour.
Well this is interesting I like this this pro we have brilliant people in this audience thanks very much out there Gene for the call actually looked into this to find out what it would cost him personally just to put up a windmill in his backyard to power his house.
Don in San Antonio, Texas.
Welcome.
From one sports connoisseur to another, I do have a question for you, Rush.
Ask it.
Do you believe the reason that the Senate, as well as the House and the Congress, is getting involved with the business of pro sports is because they use taxpayer money to build stadiums?
Well, I think that might be one of the items of leverage that they use to justify it, as well as some sports, you know, have antitrust exemption.
But I think it's similarly...
a l simply election year or close to election year grandstanding and the natural tendency of bureaucrats and people in power to want more and more of it.
I just think it's grandstanding.
I think it's I guess you talk about steroid the hearings uh for baseball, for example.
Yes.
Yes.
Especially that and everything and the in the avenues that they're using in order to get involved is because taxpayer money is being you asked upon by more owners to finance their uh their stadiums in order to get it built.
And that's their way in order to get into the business of pro sports.
So what would you suggest?
I mean the the genie's out of the bottle.
You can't you can't uh these stadiums that have already been built with uh with with uh percentage of taxpayer money are built.
Which is true.
However, I do believe more of the owners do have to finance a little bit more than what they're asking for at the same time.
But you had owners like Hunt, Lamar Hunt, uh Joe Robbie, folks that back in the day, they built their own stadiums.
They didn't sit up here and ask the pla uh asked the folks to finance it, they went up on the ticket prices in order for you to pay for work.
Yeah, I know, I know the uh the uh uh Bob Kraft, Robert Kraft of the Patriots built his own stadium.
Right for the for the Patriots.
But a lot of a lot of these teams do try to blackmail the city, hey, we're gonna have to relocate if we don't get our new stadium here.
But you know, you'll find that the the uh the foundation of this is money.
When you have when you let's look at the NFL for just a second.
Yes.
Uh revenue sharing.
Used to be pretty pretty equally spread across the board uh from all sources.
But then all of a sudden exemption started cropping up, among them luxury suites.
Yes, and the seats that are in front of them.
That revenue was kept by the team and not shared.
Well, some stadiums didn't have those.
Some stadiums had very few of those, but the newer stadiums had all kinds of those, and that meant that there were teams in the NFL that were getting richer from that kind of revenue than others, and that put a competitive uh disadvantage to the or put the other teams at what they thought was a competitive disadvantage, so they had to go out and get their stadiums too.
Now, in baseball, much the same thing is happening, although for not so much revenue sharing, but but for d the different reasons.
The new stadiums.
Have you checked the ticket prices for choice seats at the new Yankee Stadium and the new yes, sir.
Yes, sir.
This see, this is helping me uh build a uh a synopsis for a possible paper later on.
So this is just ridiculous and off the chain.
That's the reason why I asked the question.
Well, I think I think that uh the main reason that that Congress is getting involved is because they can, and they're meddlers, and they want to use threats, antitrust, they want to be involved in it as much as not just sports, but in every aspect of your life they can get themselves involved in.
Now they do need an entree, and the entree is hey, look, taxpayers are building these stadiums, we represent the taxpayers, blah, blah, blah.
You're right about that.
Okay.
No question.
Now the these ticket prices, I'm I'm gonna have to look these up specifically.
But a dugout seat dug out in three rows back at Yankee Stadium.
Uh it seems like I read two thousand dollars a year.
Yes, that's what I have right now.
That's what I've seen on the internet.
Two thousand bucks a ticket.
That's that's just bananas.
And the Mets are going to be charging some of something similar to that.
The New York Giants and the uh and the Jets are gonna move into a new stadium in a couple years.
And the Giants, who have been really of all the NFL teams, pretty fan friendly and loyal to their their fan base are gonna charge for the first time personal seat license.
Are you writing about personal seat licenses in your synopsis?
No, I didn't, and and I never considered that really.
Well, you ought to.
Do you know what a personal seat license is?
Educate me, Rush, you always do.
At one of these new stadiums, you've got an existing fan base of 70,000 season ticket holders.
Right.
For both the Jets and the Giants.
Those 70,000, well, then 70,000 people because some of them own two or three tickets, but every one of those seats that's currently held by a season ticket, you're gonna have to pay the team, I think I don't know what thirty-five or forty thousand dollars for the right to buy the season ticket.
And this is not unique.
This is this has happened in many other NFL cities and baseball cities, because look at the somebody's got to pay for the revenue they're paying the players.
And it just it boils down to the fans are gonna pay it one way or the other.
In many, many ways.
And we'll see what attendance does when these prices kick in.
All right, it's open line Friday.
Let's uh let's Head to the phones to the Tri-Cities, uh, Washington.
This is David.
I'm glad you waited, sir.
Welcome to the program.
Hello, Mr. Limbaugh.
Hi.
This is an honor.
Thank you very much, sir.
Um, my name is David Beatty, and I'm sixteen years old.
I want to thank you for the work you do to educate America and reinforce what my parents teach us.
Something I believe needs to be retail is the value of strong work ethic.
I want people to know that American dream is still alive.
I live in the Northwest where many people sing the songs of socialism.
Kids at school have no idea what it really means to have a socialist society, giving up their freedoms to quote, spread the wealth.
I try to talk about with people at school, but sometimes I can speak louder than words.
My brothers and I decided we would prove anything is possible, set a goal, work towards the goal, and accomplish the goal.
So we wrote a book that reflects the reflects just how standing for your own convictions and believing in yourself.
You say you're sixteen.
Yes.
This is amazing.
Very proud of you.
And uh last year we had the opportunity to have Gray Shine on our family.
We had lost um our grandfather in the Marine Corps Law Enforcement Foundation, Pete P. Haas stepped in and uh he was like a pillar of silent strength, which we will never forget.
He helped us go out and see our grandfather buried in Erlington.
And uh these two things tied together because we want to thank them for their help uh last year, and we want to try to raise twenty five thousand dollars for them from proceeds from our book.
And we were wondering how much it cost to advertise on your show.
And I just wanted to talk to you person to person about that.
Well, I have uh sales representatives standing by.
They're always here.
Should I answer this question uh honestly?
Um I'm fine with that.
Pardon me?
A little bit scared to hear the numbers there, but I'm fine with that.
Uh yeah, you'll be you'll be scared to hear the numbers, I think, safe to say.
But uh we have ways.
Uh on the have you how far along are you on your book?
Oh, we we have it published like uh about a month ago.
You had it public.
How many pages is it?
It's a hundred pages.
Is the is the book now in stores?
Um yes, it is.
What is the title of the book?
Pulling weeds to picking stocks.
Pulling weeds, picking stocks.
Is that right?
Is that what it said?
I'm having a hearing problem.
Pulling weeds to picking stocks.
Pulling weeds uh pulling weeds to picking stocks.
Yes.
Okay.
It's a hundred pages.
Is it a soft cover?
Yes.
Okay.
How much does it cost?
It just costs eleven dollars to buy it.
Yes.
All right, and is it available nationally or is it just in your local neighborhood in the Tri-Cities area?
I believe it is nationally available.
It is national.
Who published the the book?
Tate Publishing.
State Publishing.
All right, you have just received about a thirty-five thousand dollar commercial.
And it didn't it didn't cost you anything because your cause is worth the donation of busy broadcast time.
You want to sell this book so that you can donate further to the Marine Corps Law Enforcement Foundation.
Yes, sir.
That is and you're sixteen.
You have uh you know, I yeah, we get I've gotten a lot of calls from people your age over the uh summer, uh, as people are out of school, and a lot of you, and I just want to tell you, please don't change because you are gonna become an adult and grow and mature at about the time your participation in uh changing the direction of the country is gonna be crucial.
Yes, sir.
Uh oh, we have found out your book is also available on Amazon.
Yes.
So people can go to Amazon and pick up with their credit.
Well, here's another ten thousand dollars worth of advertising for you for you.
Pulling weeds to picking stocks.
Eleven bucks, my gosh, you can't beat that.
And proceeds, some of the proceeds that go to the Marine Corps Law Enforcement Foundation.
Well, there David, you learned a lesson here.
It never hurts to ask for what you want.
Well, thank you very much.
How else will people know?
How else would people know?
Thank you very much for your uh for your for your effort and your work here, and all the best to you, David.
Thanks for calling.
All right.
Thank you.
You bet.
Tim in Memphis, your next on Open Line Friday.
Hello.
Hello, Rush.
I was in the rush before Rush was cool.
Hey, Rush, I work for an international shipping company.
Obama, I think he said U.S. companies would be looking to Beijing.
Yeah, he did.
He said if with uh That that's that's absurd, Rush.
Uh nobody's looking to Beijing.
All the manufacturing base in China is in inland China, number one.
Number two, the infrastructure.
You said that China's infrastructure was better than the USA's.
This guy really scares me, Rush.
It scares me to death.
That is the it's absurd.
Absolutely absurd.
I know, I know it is.
Look at it, you know, if if if uh if you if you like these eye candy little construction projects for the Olympics, if you like people being kicked out of their homes to have these eye candy projects built, if you like no pollution controls whatsoever like constant smog.
If you like construction policies with so inept they can't stand all a uh stand a uh a category three earthquake or something where ten thousand people die, China might be the place for you.
This scares me to death.
He's talking about change.
I am scared.
I don't want things to change.
He just does not know what he's talking about.
This is unbelievable that a presidential candidate would make a statement like this.
China's infrastructure is better than the USA.
Has he ever been there?
Did you know that the last time I was in China I did not go to the outline areas?
You know why?
Because one of my customers was seventy-five miles away from Hong Kong, but it takes about three or four hours to get there.
Look, they've got people starving, and they can't feed all of their people.
And as I have mentioned, on this program, the biggest challenge that the Chinese ChICOM Premier has is creating twenty-five million new jobs a year, precisely in these outlying provinces that you're describing.
He's got to keep those people there.
His cities are overrun.
He cannot afford more people coming into the cities.
There isn't work for them.
He can't control them if they if they leave the countryside, they get educated and so forth.
The worst thing could happen to the ChICOM leadership.
▲
Export Selection