All Episodes
Previous Next
Nov. 21, 2008 - Rush Limbaugh Program
35:20
November 21, 2008, Friday, Hour #3
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
And greetings, welcome back.
It's Rush Limbaugh.
This is the Excellence in Broadcasting Network.
It is Friday.
Live from the Southern Command in sunny South Florida.
It's Open Line Friday.
Open Line Friday.
And that means, ladies and gentlemen, that you get to choose the topics that we talk about today.
We've got one hour left to go.
We'll get as many of your phone calls in as we can at 800-282-2882 and the email address, lrushbow at EIBnet.com.
Do you remember, HR, how long ago it was, it was recently, I think it was during this recent campaign that I, one day I referred to the Democrats, they looked like morticians, or maybe it was Dashel.
Because I said, Dashel looked like a mortician.
It was Harry Reid.
There was something looked like morticians.
Boy, is anything more accurate today than that?
The entire Democrat Party looks like morticians.
I mean, we're looking, we've got the Obama funeral home.
It's called the United States of America, the Obama funeral home.
Where is Obama?
He's embalming somewhere down in the basement.
These people look the part.
They are acting the part.
They're presiding over the death of the American capitalist system.
And they're doing so purposefully, and they seem happy about it.
Now, Obama, you know, he's a cold guy.
I think he's more than cool.
He's a cold guy, but he's very capable of delivering an inspired eulogy.
You know, Obama profits from the death of American exceptionalism.
Harry Reid profits from the death of American exceptionalism.
Rah Emmanuel set to profit from this crisis.
They personally profit with the acquisition of power from the death of American exceptionalism like any good mortician.
Yesterday afternoon on Capitol Hill, the incoming Obama chief of staff Rah Emmanuel held a press conference.
I just had a very, very good meeting with the Senate Republican leadership.
This also follows up a series of phone calls I've had with individual members of both the House and Senate Republican leadership.
I did this at the direction of President-elect Obama.
The challenges facing the country require that people of both parties work together to solve those problems.
And so I was there very early.
You know, this is obviously the last week of the 110th Congress, but I told them I would like and welcome their ideas.
We would like and welcome their ideas on a host of fronts, be that in the area of education, health care, taxes, energy policy, national security, to give us those ideas as we are formulating what we're going to do in the Obama administration.
He can't fool me.
This is what a crock this is.
If he's talking to any conservative Republicans, I guarantee you the ideas they offer on education, health care, taxes, energy, national security will be immediately tossed out.
If there are some moderate McCain-like Republicans that he's talking to, then the ideas they have will not differ much from the ideas of Obama.
So they'll be able to say that they're working bipartisan on this.
But this is just a crock.
He's already up there twisting arms is what he's doing.
He gets to control the meeting.
He comes out, does the press conference.
Oh, yeah.
We had a great meeting up there.
Yeah, total Republicans.
Whatever you are, we want your ideas.
Give your ideas and we'll work them into what our plans are.
We know what your plans are, Ram.
You want to nationalize health care.
You want to raise taxes.
You want to spend even more on education while dumbing down the results.
You want to go total green, environmentalist wacko on energy, on national security, who the hell knows.
You want to close Gitmo.
You want to get out of Iraq.
Here's another portion of what he had to say.
Since I was named, I also have been reaching out and I've had about 20-plus phone calls with members of the Republican Conference.
And this is all an attempt because as President-elect Obama has repeatedly said, the challenges for the country are large.
The problems we face are of a serious magnitude.
That there is enough area and enough goodwill for ideas from both parties to solve those challenges.
So with that, and I don't want to be disrespectful to my former Republican colleagues who are waiting for a meeting, I'm going to go have a meeting with them.
Right.
So, yeah, I think, again, whatever conservative Republican ideas he's going to hear will be ignored immediately.
So these are the morticians, Rahm Emmanuel, Barack Obama, Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi.
And they're presiding over, gleefully so, the death of capitalism.
I mean, we've got the death of free market health care that they're getting ready for, socialized matters.
We've got the death of borders.
It's called amnesty.
We have the death of science and reason called global warming and cap and trade.
We have the death of the stock market.
We have potentially the death of IRAs.
We have the death of the American dream.
If Obama's tax increases kick in for people anywhere, what is the number's gone from 120 to 250, but whatever the number is, that's when the American dream ends, because that's when your tax increases kick in.
And income taxes are the number one weapon government uses to prevent the amassing of wealth.
We already know we've got the death of journalism, but what do they care?
They just saw their guy win by dumbing down 52% of the population.
You know, everybody's talking about we had the death of journalism and that they've lost all credibility.
What do they care?
They don't think they lost any credibility.
They won.
They got the guy elected.
Their audience is each other anyway.
But in a pure sense, yeah, we've seen the death of journalism.
We've seen the death of peace through strength.
Obama promising to disarm our nuclear arsenal and get on the phone with people and get them like Putin.
And the rest of these guys did the same thing.
We've also seen the death of the Democrat Party of JFK.
So they are.
I mean, there are a bunch of morticians out there, folks.
They're acting like it.
They're presiding over this country as though they are morticians.
And we just did a quick search.
It was February 3rd, 2005, where I first used the term mortician to describe the Democrat Party.
And it was a State of the Union speech last night, big focus on domestic issues.
And the Democrat reaction to it was a Bush State of the Union, Democrat reaction to it.
These guys look like a bunch of morticians.
They send somebody out there to talk about it.
Unemployment, this Goldman Sachs, Goldman Sachs projection, unemployment will reach 9%, currently 6.5%, by the end of next year.
The economy will shrink in each quarter until mid-2009, said the Wizards of Smart at Goldman Sachs today.
Their forecasts are lower than previous predictions due to continuing signs of falling domestic and foreign demand, labor market deterioration, renewed tightening in financial conditions, and an apparent impasse in fiscal policy pending the transfer of power to the Obama administration in late January.
Now, at what point does Washington wake up?
Now, I know, look, facetious here, it's a rhetorical question.
I'm asking it to make a point.
At what point does Washington wake up and stop taxing everybody to the hilt?
Leave the private sector alone.
Leave the American people alone.
The people who make this country work can rebuild this economy.
In fact, they know it, by the way, because all these promises of further stimulus packages, what are those?
The purpose of those stimulus packages is to put money in everybody's pocket so they can start spending.
Consuming out there.
You want people to start consumer-led recovery?
Okay, fine and dandy.
Get out of the way and let consumers and let the private sector and let the people who make this country work start the recovery process.
All this central planning will guarantee that we'll be pursuing misery instead of happiness.
There is not a single answer to job creation.
There are millions of answers.
Jobs come from millions of businesses and individuals risking their money, if they have any, on business ideas that they have confidence in.
And they've got confidence because they know that what they can do, given their unique talents and situations, will work if the environment's right for it.
They just need to keep more of their money and have fewer government restrictions.
What Washington has to do is get rid of job-killing regulations, reduce taxes so Americans can solve this.
The American people can and will solve this if given the opportunity to.
It isn't going to be bureaucrats and politicians in Washington.
Obama's not going to solve anything.
No one person can.
Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi, Barney Frank, Chris Dodd, they are killing the U.S. economy.
Bailing this out, bailing that out, government owning a part of this business, a part of that sector.
If millions of Americans are set free from all of this, then millions of Americans will create jobs through innovation, risk-taking, and just the natural order of things.
Might not be a new way forward, but we should remember one of Reagan's timeless truths.
Government's not the solution.
Government is the problem.
See, this economic crisis was not caused by you or me or anybody else in the private sector.
We're sitting here minding our own business.
And these people throughout the bureaucracy, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and the pressure brought to bear on banks and lending institutions on Wall Street and so forth, the public sector created this problem.
And it's so damn frustrating to have people think that the very people who created a problem are the only ones who can solve it.
This problem can only be solved by people in the private sector.
That's known as the market.
The problem we face is that the people that caused the problem don't want to get out of the way.
It's the source of their power.
And they, as Rahm Emanuel said, grab soundbite number five.
Can't play this enough.
Soundbite number five, this crisis is just too great to let it go to waste.
You never want a serious crisis to go to waste.
And what I mean by that, it's an opportunity to do things that you think you could not do before.
Stop.
This is an opportunity.
An opportunity to do things that you think you could not do.
He's not talking about you.
This crisis doesn't afford you any opportunity.
He's talking about agenda items of the Democrat Party.
This crisis gives the Democrat Party an opportunity to do things they've always wanted to do, but haven't been able to do because it was too big a leap.
But now with the crisis, it's easier to get health care nationalized.
It's easier to raise taxes on whoever they want to raise taxes on.
It's easier to get all these regulations.
He's talking about him.
So you listen to this.
Queue it to the top, please.
He's talking about himself, his party, the Democrat Party, and their agenda.
He's not talking about you.
You never want a serious crisis to go to waste.
And what I mean by that, it's an opportunity to do things that you think you could not do before.
This is an opportunity what used to be long-term problems, be they in the healthcare area, energy area, education area, fiscal area, tax area, regulatory reform area.
Things that we had postponed for too long that were long-term are now immediate and must be dealt with.
And this crisis provides the opportunity for us, as I would say, the opportunity to do things that you could not do before.
It's Open Line Friday.
We go back to the phones now.
People have been, as always, patiently waiting.
Here is Carol in Parma, Ohio.
Nice to have you on the EIB network.
Hello.
Hi, Rush.
I'm a first-time caller, and I think you're wonderful.
I had a question on the bailout yesterday.
I wondered what you thought.
Do you think it's going to affect retirees' benefits, pensions, insurance, and anything?
You mean the auto business, the auto workers?
Well, even if, in whatever plan that comes down to Pike, even if, from your standpoint, the worst case scenario, as I understand it, if the auto companies are able to offload some of the pensions, the federal government has an agency that buys them up to a maximum of $50,000 a year.
Now, I don't know what your husband or your pension pays you, but if it's more than $50,000 a year, and if you happen to lose it, the government will buy it.
Government fixes everything, don't you see?
And then they'll make it good up to a $50,000 a year payoff.
I think that's fairly close to being accurate.
So I don't have any idea what's going to happen.
Well, I do.
I do know that there's going to be a bailout of some kind.
It'll happen after Obama is inaugurated.
The Obama transition team has actually come up with this pre-packaged bankruptcy plan that the government would fund and to spare them of going through all the hassles of courts and so forth.
One way or the other, the auto companies are going to get a bailout of some kind.
They're going to get restrictions of how they must operate because too many people think the way they're operating now is going to result in their death.
So in order for them to get the money, which they're going to get, because the Democrats want the unions to not suffer, they want the unions to get to bailout Jennifer Grand Holmes in the state of Michigan.
It'll be called an automaker bailout, but it's actually being done for other purposes.
And I think the pensions end up going to being protected in this circumstance.
I mean, that will be the whole point of the Democrat bailout.
Speaking of all this, though, it's an interesting story.
You may have heard this already, that Walmart is showing a profit.
Walmart's anticipating a huge holiday season where very few other retailers are.
And of course, I just saw on cable news, I saw another, this stuff is in a formula.
Christmas shoppers will delay even further this year, waiting for deals and bargains on the holiday gifts.
Really?
That's news.
They do it every year.
Everybody's looking for the best deal they can.
There's hardly anybody goes out and says, what's the price?
Okay, great.
Double it.
What is this?
It's a every year some turkey's being mistreated somewhere in the week before Thanksgiving.
McDonald's profits are up.
Walmart Stores, the world's largest retailer, unexpectedly today announced that its chief executive will retire in February and be replaced by the head of its international division.
The Bentonville, Arkansas-based retailer said that Mike Duke, 58, will take the reins from Lee Scott effective February 1st.
Duke also becomes a member of the board of directors immediately.
The international business is the company's fastest-growing division.
Profit rose 11% during this quarter, while U.S. profit rose 7%.
Walmart international profit up 11%, domestic 7%.
You know, you read this story and it makes you think, we're being told the economy is diving.
It's in a spiral.
The Democrats are more titians.
Walmart is soaring.
Now, how can this be?
What do you think?
And by the way, Walmart is on the big enemies list of the Democrat Party.
Why do you think it might be that Walmart is showing a 7% retail?
This is retail, folks.
I know some of it's food necessity, but a lot of it's retail.
How in the world is Walmart doing this amidst all this horrible, horrible economic news?
Why do they remain at the top of the Democrat Party enemies list?
Why do they got to get Walmart?
Why do they not like Walmart, even though Walmart's showing the way to prosperity?
Well, the questions kind of answer themselves.
If you've got a private sector firm that can profit while everything the government touches is going to hell in a handbasket, even though we have a shortage of handbaskets, you can understand why the government would resent them.
But I think one of the biggest reasons for this is that they have driven back all attempts to unionize.
So this Christmas, when you have less money, disposable money, gas is half what it was five months ago, Walmart's offering good deals, and they're showing a profit, offering you discount prices.
How can this be?
Ha!
Welcome back, Open Line Friday, Rush Limbaugh, half my brain tied behind my back just to make it fair.
Now, I was under the impression because I listened to Senator Obama during the campaign.
He's only going to raise taxes on the rich because they've got it.
They don't need it.
They have more than they need.
They can afford it, right?
And so he needs to raise taxes on the rich and cut taxes on the quote-unquote middle classes.
So he wants economic recovery to bubble up from the bottom or whatever, which is very tough to do when you're at the bottom and you're broke.
Now, I don't know how you bubble anything up when you're broke, but that's not the point.
I have a story here from A.P. Obama, and it's about three Colorado ski resorts being forced to lay off workers.
It's from the Durango Herald.
We read the Durango Herald every day here.
It's part of our show proportion.
The ski season, the ski season, oh yeah, they'll put in the banner on their red by, it might embarrass them so much they go out of business.
The ski season is shaping up to be the worst in years, said a Canadian ski resort company that has announced that it's laid off workers across a dozen resorts, including three in Colorado.
Vancouver-based IntraWest Corporation hasn't said exactly how many workers it let go, but company officials say that the weak economy is squeezing the ski business.
Now, who is it that goes out to Colorado and skis?
No, it's not the poor.
The poor are working in the hotels.
The poor are working in the rest of the quote-unquote poor.
The poor are working at the ski resorts where the rich are not going because the economy is cutting into their disposable income and they think that they've got tax increases coming.
Colorado's steamboat ski and resort, for example, more than three hours by car from Denver, because of that, most visitors fly in.
They stay several days, while smaller resorts closer to big cities have an easier time surviving a poor economy.
They're not as dependent on out-of-state and international visitors, said Dave Bellin or Bellin, director at Boulder-based research firm RRC Associates, in a quote to the Rocky Mountain News.
Now, in a survey of skiers conducted online last month, RRC Associates found that most skiers planned to ski as often as last year, but they're going to cut back in other ways.
Lodging, lessons, and other extras, such as traveling a long way to get to a ski mountain.
Now, see, I thought tax increases and other trivial income killers amounted to chump change to wealthy Americans.
But this is what I told you, and this is the main reason I said we got to support Senator McCain, in fact, because his tax policy was right.
Every time you hear Obama or some Democrat talking about raising taxes on the rich to help the little guy, it's the little guy that gets shafted.
And this ski resort story is a classic example.
So we have to take the wealthy down a notch or two.
How could that hurt anybody?
Why, that couldn't hurt anybody.
We've got to take the wealthy down a notch or two.
They give up a little chump change.
Obama can spend it on welfare checks for those who don't pay income taxes.
And life is good for everybody.
Except raising taxes is not chump change to rich people.
That was just Obama shooting his mouth off.
It turns out when the wealthy are pummeled by bad economic news of any kind, they pull back too.
Nothing is chump change.
And so now they're going to visit ski resorts less.
And when they, the people that pay the freight by going skiing, go less or don't stay overnight in hotels and so forth, the ski resorts, three of them owned by a Canadian firm, are laying off the little guy.
The guy who's supposed to benefit from tax increases on the rich.
Here's David in Scottsdale.
Great to have you on the program, sir.
Hello.
Rush, long time listener since the 80s.
Thank you, sir.
I'd like to give you my thoughts on why so many Clinton people in there.
I think the Clintons were experts at co-opting what was happening in the private sector during the 90s.
They co-opted the internet revolution, the computer chip, the processing, and the way we did business, and took it as their own.
So now what Obama's doing, he wants that same type of thing with energy, which is the next big thing on the horizon.
Wait just a second.
David, hang on.
I need you to help me understand something.
How were the Clintons expert at co-opting the private sector?
They co-opted the internet revolution.
What do you mean by that?
They co-opted the computer chip process in a way we did.
How did the Clintons co-opt that?
What do you mean by that?
During the campaign, they always referred back to look what was happening in the 90s, how good the economy was.
They're claiming that they were in the driver's seat.
They were just in the car.
The private sector was driving the economy.
Oh, oh, oh, okay.
You're saying it was a myth that they did all this stuff, but people think they did.
So Obama wants people to think that he's doing the same thing with the economy.
Correct.
I got you.
Okay.
Now, as far as energy goes, energy is the next big thing out on the horizon.
But I think it's not where it's supposed to be because it's been overhyped.
So now he has to pull back on all these crazy ideas because some of them are way out there 10, 15 years from now.
He needs to be in office when they happen.
It's not happening in the next couple of years.
Right.
So, but there's got to be more than that to explain why he's populating his administration almost thoroughly with Clinton East.
That's part of it.
Second-term Clinton East is, by the way, too.
Not for Janet Reno's nowhere around, for example.
And Roger Altman's Nowhere Around.
These are second-term Clinton people that he is populating his administration with.
And there are a lot of people who go, where's the change here?
What change?
Where are the fresh new faces?
It is puzzling.
By the way, you know how stupid we all are.
You know, I've been beating myself off over this since last night.
I don't know what made me just remember it.
Well, this goes to show you how easily we all get caught up in media hype.
This Hillary at Secretary of State business.
Everybody's sitting around saying, why?
What's the big deal?
Having fun watching who's leaking to who, who's trying to cause problems, what's this all about?
Why would Hillary even take it?
And the most obvious answer had probably occurred to a lot of you.
It didn't to me.
I got caught up in the, wait a second, how in the world does she run for president in 2000?
Because you know she wants to.
You know she wants to be president.
You know that they want to get back in the White House.
So I'm asking myself, well, how in the world do they do that when she's Secretary of State?
She'd have to start running in 210, 211.
There aren't going to be too many people opposing him unless he just, I mean, this turns out to be a disaster.
And it could well be that.
Don't tell a whole lot of people.
I want to just keep it between us.
It could be bad.
But they can't count on that happening.
Why would she put herself at Secretary of State where it would look very, very bad to leave that office and run against the guy that appointed you to that important job and so forth?
It makes me think I ought to give back an hour's pay, which believe me, folks, is substantial, for overlooking and missing this.
What better way to undermine this poor little guy than within the State Department?
Look how they undermine Bush.
Look at how Powell and Armitage would libby.
Look at how the leaking of all the battle plans, look at how they and the State Department people are very tight with people in the media.
Of course, the media is very tight with Obama in a symbiotic way.
They just can't let him fail.
He's just too historically important.
But the whole notion of what better way to undermine the guy than being in his cabinet totally slipped my mind.
This is how easy it is, folks, to forget just who the Clintons really are.
I'm sorry about this.
I really.
The Democrat Party assuring a better today tomorrow.
800-282-2882.
See this.
Obama has time to send a signal to the military engage.
He doesn't have time to deal with the economy right now.
He's got a little time to help with the automakers and their bankruptcy.
But I guess this is more important than sending a signal to Wall Street, Obama, to delay repeal of Don't Ask, Don't Tell.
This will not sit well in certain sectors of our society.
He was going to get rid of this lickety split.
This had to go.
Don't ask, don't tell.
And the military had to go.
Yeah, he's going to have to delay that.
So he can send a signal to the homosexual crowd.
He can send a signal to the military.
But for some reason, he just will not send a signal to Wall Street about what his plans are.
Doesn't want the stability.
Adam in Fairbolt, Minnesota.
Welcome to the EIB network, sir.
Hello.
Hi, Rush.
How are you?
Just fine, sir.
Say, mega Christian Conservative dittos to you from Travald, Minnesota, home of the Tilter Whirl.
I appreciate that.
My wife and I were recently blessed with the good news that we're going to be having a baby in May, and we're going through baby names.
And before I bring the name to her, I'd like to put a little bit of tools in my toolkit.
And the name of Rush, how did it come about?
What does it mean?
Well, are you considering naming?
This is a human baby you're considering naming after me.
It is a human baby.
Right, I was going to say if it's a dog, please don't because eventually you're going to have to take the dog.
Hey, Doc, I got Rush here and he needs to be neutered.
No, it's a human baby.
If it's a human baby, the simple explanation is I am Rush Hudson Limbaugh III, and my grandfather was given the first name Rush because it's the last name of another strain, another branch of his family, who's a woman whose name was one of their aunts or great aunts named Edna Rush or something.
And they wanted to keep that family name alive since she was the last woman in that line.
And so that's the Rush is actually the last name of some distant, long-forgotten family member.
Gotcha.
It has nothing to do with being in a hurry.
It has nothing at all like that.
And what was it like growing up with a name like Rush on the playground?
Well, since I was the third, I was not called Rush.
But it's interesting.
I was called Rusty.
Okay.
My dad wanted to call me Butch.
My mother didn't go for that.
And mothers always win those battles.
Sure.
So I was all called.
In fact, a lot of my family still call me that when we get together.
But honest to God now, my first radio job away from home, I went to Pittsburgh and I worked for a station that was owned by ABC and they would not let me use that name because they thought that listeners would think that I had a lisp, that my name was Russ, and that I couldn't say it, that I said Rush, and that they would misspell it and so forth.
So they made me go to the phone book and find a name that I liked or pick a name that I liked and go to the phone book and make sure it wasn't there.
So that person didn't get bugged.
So it wasn't the short version of the story is it wasn't until I started using my real name that my success track began to actually happen.
So I think depending on what you, the middle name of this human baby, that you're going to have the middle name is, but I don't think you'd have any problem whatsoever with a kid named Rush.
Not the only, there's some rushes.
Just don't, you know, don't name him Rush Button because he could become a butler.
But I mean, you know, Ethel Kennedy's father, Ethel can marry to Robert Kennedy.
His name was Rushton.
First name is Rushton, R-U-S-H-T-O-N.
So there's any number of variations, but it's a very sophisticated, aristocratic name, and it's unique.
And in fact, I am, I'm telling you what, I am so honored you're even thinking of it.
And I don't want to have any role in influencing you here.
I just answered your questions, right?
That's right.
I'm going to send you a special collection.
Do you and your wife eat beef?
Oh, we do eat beef.
I love it.
Have you ever ordered anything from Allen Brothers?
I have not.
Oh, well, I'm going to say for, I may not be able to get it there before Thanksgiving, but I'm going to try.
I'm going to send you an assortment of stuff from Allen Brothers because, you know, it's holiday time.
I'm starting to feel like I'm always a generous giving guy, but this stuff is just, you can't get it other than at Allen Brothers, and it's that unique, it's that special.
And I know people are having a lot of people having challenging economic times.
I believe in times like treat yourself.
And this is one way to do it.
So if you'll allow me to get your address, it has to be a FedEx or it has to be a UPS overnight shipping address after we finish it.
So don't hang up.
Okay.
We'll put you on hold.
That sounds great.
Rush, you're a blessing to me, and you're a blessing to the listening community.
So thank you.
Thanks very much.
And congratulations on your new baby.
And I'll let you know how things turn out tonight at the dinner table.
I hope so.
Moving on.
Now, don't hang up.
Whatever you do out there, Adam.
Terry in Charlotte, North Carolina.
Welcome to the EIB Network.
Hello.
Thanks, Rush.
I'm so happy and nervous to talk to you.
Don't be nervous.
Don't be nervous.
I have a question for you.
I know you're not a spiritual advisor, but perhaps you could help me out.
When I found out that the majority of Catholics voted for Obama, I've had trouble as a Catholic attending church without some animosity toward my fellow parishioners, and I was wondering if you had any advice as to, you know, how to...
Yeah, I do.
Okay.
I'm not a spiritual advisor, nor am I a spiritual counselor, but you can't control what they do anyway.
And as such, you should not let anything they do make you feel, I mean, it's going to make you feel sad or unhappy, but it shouldn't ruin your day.
It's not, it's their life that they're toying with not yours.
They haven't messed with your values.
They didn't, I don't know if the words corrupt your beliefs and so forth.
But if anything, after you get mad at them, you might want to spend some time feeling a little sympathy for him because it's inexplicable.
It really, to people who are fervent believers in the sanctity of life and are members of a religion that is unbending on that, sit around and vote for somebody who's not just pro-life.
This is a man who voted three times for legislation to allow babies born alive in botched abortions not to be saved because the mother's original intent was to abort the child.
I mean, that's infanticide.
You know what?
I'd give them the benefit of the doubt.
Based on what we have learned from polling data, a lot of Obama voters simply didn't know anything about what he stood for.
And I would bet you a bunch of the Catholics that voted for him don't even know what his pro-life position is or pro-abortion because he wasn't asked constantly.
Abortion was barely mentioned in debates.
I bet a lot of them didn't know about it.
Terry, we'll be back.
Have a great weekend, folks, and we will be back on Monday to clean up whatever drive-by messes have been made the next two days.
Looking forward to it as Thanksgiving week is upon us.
We'll see you then.
▲
Export Selection