Hey, remember something, folks, that I mentioned at top of the hour today.
The Reverend Jackson in Evian, France, at a conference of the first World Policy Forum held at a lakeside resort in Evian, France, the Reverend Jackson promised fundamental changes in U.S. foreign policy if Obama is elected, saying America must heal wounds it is caused to other nations.
He said the Zionists who have controlled American policy for decades will lose a great deal of their clout when Obama enters the White House.
Zionists, obviously code word for Jews.
So the Reverend Jackson telling the world, again, the World Policy Forum at Obama.
He's going to take care of the Jews.
The Jews, they're going to lose a lot of power once Obama's in there.
Greetings, welcome back.
It's Rush Limbaugh, the Excellence in Broadcasting Network, 800-282-2882, if you want to be on the program.
And the email address is lrushbow at EIBnet.com.
Okay, so I think you read Stanley Kurtz and just apply some common sense to this.
It was kind of like a light going off with me.
It's one of these things that you know, one of these things you suspect, but it never made it to the frontal lobe to the point of being voiced, point of being voiced, but it made no sense to me.
Why, with so much rampant prosperity all around us, the opportunities for expanding one's circumstances to become educated, to become prosperous, to become successful.
Why is it that one group of Americans, for some reason, in large part, failed?
Whereas some members of that group did, and they were torn down.
They were ripped to shreds.
The Clarence Thomases, the Shelby Steeds, the Thomas Soules, the Condoleezza Rice's, these people.
They became the enemy.
They became Uncle Tom's.
And it was almost as though the Democrat Party was, well, they were content with the majority of the black population to be angry, irritated, agitated, so long as they could be made to believe it was Republicans who were keeping them there.
And now we find out that it's been Acorn all along.
And the educational policies of Bill Ayers and the SDS, the new left, led by people like Tom Hayden and Bill Ayers and all the rest.
They have been active since the 1960s.
All these former SDS people, students for Democrat Society, that's why its former leaders back Obama.
Lots of books have been written about this.
These are the same people that backed Mao Zetong, Ho Chi Men, Castro.
They are Marxists.
They have learned how to communicate and manipulate.
They have learned to adapt socialism to American society.
What's amazing is that this extensive network, this extensive network and movement goes wholly unreported by the likes of Tom Brokaw, Charlie Gibson, Dan Rather, Peter Jennings, Katie Couric, Brian Williams.
This is the movement that undermined the Vietnam War, that tried to undermine us in Iraq.
And they are three weeks away from electing one of their own, if they can, Barack Obama.
And that is why any effort to expose Obama's connections with this movement and others on the extreme left are attacked as racist.
They don't want us to go there.
And they know that charging anybody with racism will shut them up.
Well, not a lot, not everybody, but it'll shut up enough people.
It has shut up McCain.
It has signed.
Will not talk about Jeremiah Wright.
We are confronted here with a movement that we are not permitted to expose.
Does this mean the drive-by media is also Marxist?
Who knows?
One thing I just know for sure is that the drive-by media hates Republicans and they hate conservatives.
And anybody with a D next to their name is okay with them.
It doesn't matter what they've done, to whom they've done it.
It doesn't matter how ineffective their policies are.
It doesn't matter how if they're cheats, if they're frauds, it doesn't matter.
If they've got a D next to their name, it's fine with the drive-bys.
Whether the drive-bys are full-fledged into Marxism and the SDS, that's for somebody else to say.
But even if they're not, how would you know the difference by virtue of what they're promoting?
So they may as well be.
This Acorn stuff, folks, is crucial.
It puts the lie to all of Obama's airy rhetoric about change and social justice.
It shows concretely what the left means by these terms.
Bill Ayers talks about change, too, through the popular empowerment to achieve participatory democracy.
This is exactly what Acorn says it's doing by rounding up the dregs of society to vote.
Would somebody explain to me why do poor people need help voting?
Why do poor people need help registering?
Poor people are not stupid and they're not constantly poor.
People move in and out of what we call the poverty quintile all the time, but this assumption that in this country the poor people are the downtrodden dregs of society who don't even know how to get out of bed without a liberal organization or piece of legislation helping them.
You want to know why all of these Democrat, liberal organizations oppose photo ID for voting?
You're looking at it.
It's called Acorn.
If you need, if you are required to have a photo ID, you cannot vote if you don't have one.
Remember the situation in Georgia where they wanted to pass, give everybody a voter idea, the Jesse Jacksons of the world went down there and raised holy hell.
No, you can't do that.
State of Georgia said, okay, we'll go to their houses.
We'll go to where they live because Jesse Jackson said they're afraid to leave their homes.
These are poor black people afraid to leave their homes.
They may not go back.
They're afraid they're going to be captured.
Jesse Jackson, well, the agencies will go to their homes.
Jesse Jackson said, no.
These people cannot stand government agents walking into their house.
They won't trust it.
They won't think, they'll think that they're being spied on.
They come up with the most ridiculous explanations to avoid anything with voter or photo ID, and this is why.
Can't cheat.
They want to cheat.
They can't win on their own.
They couldn't win very much at all on their own.
Bill Ayers, he talks about change, popular empowerment to achieve participatory democracy.
This is what Acorn says it's doing by rounding up all of these poor people to vote.
And it turns out that what Ayers has in mind by all this change is Hugo Chavez's totalitarian socialism in Venezuela.
I have here an excerpt of Ayers, and I told you this last week, 2006, two years ago, a speech in Caracas honoring Hugo Chavez for his educational reforms.
And I mentioned this to you last week when I said the real problem with Ayers is not his terrorist past.
It's what he's doing now, radicalizing the U.S. education system.
Here are a couple of paragraphs from his speech.
It could have been written by Acorn.
Quote, capitalism promotes racism and materialism, turning people into consumers, not citizens.
Participatory democracy, by contrast, requires free people coming together voluntarily as equals who are capable of both self-realization and at the same time full participation in a shared political and economic life.
Venezuelans have shown the world that with full participation, full inclusion, popular empowerment, the failing of capitalist schooling can be resisted and overcome.
Venezuela is a beacon to the world in its accomplishment of eliminating illiteracy in record time and engaging virtually the entire population in the ongoing project of education.
Now, the key to this is his educational ideas are rooted in the overthrow of capitalist education, the promotion of socialist education.
They believe America is inherently unfair, unjust, and this must be rectified.
Everybody must be equal.
Everybody must have equal opportunity and equal outcomes.
Everybody must be the same.
Barack Obama cannot separate himself from this group.
He cannot separate himself from Bill Ayers or Jeremiah Wright or any of the other radical leftists that have made up his close circle since the time he got active in politics in Chicago.
If you wonder how it has been that only one segment of our population has had way too many members of its membership or group fail to ride along this upward wave of America for the last 30 years, the answer is Acorn.
The answer is the SDS, the radical leftists and Marxists who want them angry, who want them hating this country.
They're being taught and have been taught to hate this country.
It was a movement.
It was a religion.
Jeremiah Wright, Barack Obama, Bill Ayers up to their big ears in it, and the Piesta resistance is that it was all paid for with U.S. tax dollars as authorized by legislation sponsored by the Democrat Party.
Because the Socialist Democrat Party today, as it's currently constituted, not only relies, it requires as much ignorance on the part of as many of its voters as possible in order to survive.
It requires even more and more ignorance among its voters to survive.
In other words, to have its own power.
And we are three weeks away from having somebody in the White House who thinks what's going on in China is great and what's going on in Venezuela is great, who thinks we need to spread the wealth around, tells a plumber, I don't want to punish your success.
I just think it's fairer if we spread the wealth around a little bit to those beneath you.
A quick timeout.
We will continue after this.
Now, watching Governor Palin here in the brakes of Scranton, Pennsylvania, crowds going nuts again up there.
They just can't contain them.
Let's listen to how the drive-bys analyzed Governor Palin's appearance on this program last hour.
Here is Enria Mitchell in BC News, Washington with Chris Saliza from the, I guess it's the Washington Post.
Let's listen to a second to Rush Limbo and Sarah Palin.
As I listened to your campaign appearances and Senator McCain's, it seems that you are the more forceful in speaking out against Obama and his campaign ideas.
Are they giving you pretty much free rein to attack this campaign as you wish?
Well, you know, there just aren't enough hours in the day.
I've got nothing to lose in this, and I think America has everything to gain by understanding the differences, the contrast here between Obama and McCain.
So, you know, I'm going out there, and I'm just simply speaking, so be it that I'm a simple talker, but I'm just going out there and letting people know the differences.
Now, here is how Andrea Mitchell and B.C. Neil Washington and Chris Aleza analyzed that.
Well, the truth of the matter is, Andrea, I do still think that Sarah Palin is playing the more conventional role of a vice president, which is to really carry the heavy artillery and the heavy attack.
You know, I think what Rush Limbaugh is getting at there, though, is that many conservatives feel as though Sarah Palin is really the candidate making the case against Barack Obama and not John McCain.
They want John McCain to do more.
And look, any problem that John McCain has on his right just compounds the problem that he has in the ideological middle right now, and that's not something he needs to worry about.
What is the ideological middle?
Would somebody please help me?
Maybe I'm not as politically astute as I thought, but how in the world can you have an ideological middle?
What is it?
What do people in the ideological middle believe?
Chris Alezza just said that if McCain goes out and rallies his Republican base, that he's going to anger the ideological middle.
Now, the latest Zogby numbers have it.
What did I say?
It's basically four points.
Obama over racist America.
Because if you don't vote Obama, you're racist America.
That's what John Lewis said.
So, four points.
And if you look at the internals of the poll, it points out that the large majority of the margin that Obama leads by is his overwhelming lead in independent voters.
It seems to me that McCain has lost the independent voters.
Never had them, by the way, because independent voters are Democrats in waiting.
What is the ideological middle?
There is no ideological middle.
This is the point.
This is another attempt to get McCain to shut up and to resist the advice to go peddle to the medal on Obama.
This is an effort to get McCain to be afraid of rallying his own party.
Oh, don't do that or you'll lose the independents.
You'll lose the ideological middle.
There is no ideological middle unless having no, unless saying you have no opinion on anything is an ideology.
But of course, the ideological middle does have opinions on things.
They just don't like telling people what they are.
More audio soundbites.
We're back here to number eight, Mike.
Yesterday, just to give you some more Acorn stuff and just give you a flavor for this.
Cuyahoga County Board of Elections hearing on Acorn, Domino's pizza worker Christopher Barkley testified and said this.
To me, ask me, would I sign these papers?
So I'd be like, no, I'm already registered.
And then they just ask me again, like, I need a job.
I'm just trying to hold on to a job.
So would you sign it for me?
I need 25 of them or I need a certain amount of them to do it.
So me being a kind-hearted person, I say, yeah.
So he registered himself a bunch of times in order to make sure the poor little Acorn person didn't get fired.
Little Acorn person had a quota.
Well, I think there was, I don't know, it's impossible to know, sir.
At least nobody wants to know.
Is the guy signed himself up 70 times or 25 times?
How about the guy signing himself up 150 times?
They're probably going to find that too.
But anyway, this is the technique that they would use.
They'd send these people out.
Oh, I'm going to lose my job.
I just need your signature.
I just need your.
Okay, I'm a nice-hearted guy.
I'll do it.
Here's Ohio voter Freddie Johnson had this exchange with an election official at Cuyahoga County Board of Elections hearing yesterday.
They tell me that it's cool to sign again because they need the signature because they get paid off of signatures, so they just needed the signature, and they told me I wasn't going to get in trouble.
Did they offer you anything, Mr. Johnson, in regards to signing?
I mean, some of the employees just, you know, they really needed the signature, so they'd be like, I'll give you a cigarette or I'll give you a dollar for the signature.
And did they give you a cigarette or a dollar?
Yeah.
Yeah.
So Acorn, big leftists now worried to death about people smoking, passing out cigarettes, passing out dollars, paying people to register.
This is the tip of the iceberg what they're doing with elections, what they're doing with all this fraudulent registration, which we have mentioned on details of the previous hour.
Let me grab another call.
Gina in Houston, thank you for waving your next on the EIB network.
Hi.
Hi, Rush.
Thank you for taking my call, and it's a pleasure and an honor to follow Governor Palin.
Thank you.
You are the first call to follow her.
You're absolutely right.
Well, thank you.
Just to let you know, there was an article in the Houston Chronicle this morning that approximately 30% of nearly 20,000 voters registered by Acorn here in Houston were subject to, were questionable.
And a call went out to alternative judges or alternate judges to the Republican voter base here in Houston for 100 polling places to have alternate judges.
And if they could not find Republicans, they had Acorn volunteers waiting in the wings to take those spots.
And the Republican voters have stepped up to the plate and are going to fill those positions.
But my question to you is: where's the investigation by the Justice Department and those that govern our country, not necessarily Congress, who root out Acorn in their attempts to word the election costs?
There's a state investigation in, what is it, Ohio?
To check, a state RICO investigation.
No, no, it's a lawsuit that's been filed, a RICO lawsuit by a public interest group.
There needs to be a RICO Justice Department investigation led by Patrick Fitzgerald in Chicago.
That's where this needs to happen.
But folks, even if it does, there won't be anything announced before the election, as you well know.
Hi, welcome back, Rush Limboy and the Limbaugh Institute for Advanced Conservative Studies.
Stephen Sproul posting it, National Review online.
I guess, I don't know if it's him, it's somebody sent him a note.
Regardless, listen to this.
My eighth-grade son is in an advanced English class at a public school in Racine, Wisconsin.
I just found out that my son's new Copyright 2008 Wisconsin McDougall Littel literature book has 15 pages covering Obama.
I was shocked.
There's no mention of McCain in the book, no Hillary Clinton, no George Bush, just Barack Obama.
I'm wondering how it is that Obama's story gets put into an eighth-grade literature book.
I mean, it'd be one thing if it was just a tidbit about his boyhood days, but 15 pages, and they talk about his life of service.
Honestly, what's Obama really done to be included in this book?
According to the website of McDougal, the publisher, the literature book section on Obama discusses a chapter from Dreams from My Father, his book, and Obama's keynote address to the 2004 Democrat Convention.
So they got little kids singing to Obama all over the country.
They got quasi-military groups marching and pledging allegiance to Obama as they do to Kim Jong-il and North Korea, Kim, whatever little pot-billied guy.
And yeah, Kim Jong-il.
And now they've got textbooks.
This is going to really upset Bill Clinton because he was the guy that owns all the pages in textbooks.
Well, that's history.
They're putting Obama in the literature.
I'm sorry.
Eighth-grade advanced literature is where they are putting Barack Obama.
Get this.
This from the Chicago Tribune.
The Federal Trade Commission said today that it has busted a global spam network responsible of sending for sending billions of illegal messages, encouraging consumers to buy unsafe weight loss pills and pills like Viagra.
The FTC, which handles a civil aspect of illegal spam cases, asked the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois to issue a temporary injunction against two men in New Zealand and Texas.
The spam network, which processed credit card information in Cyprus and Georgia, used servers in Georgia, or China rather, to host its websites.
Okay, so the FTC is out there busting this spam network behind billions of fake Viagra and so forth.
Could we get the feds to go out and bust some Acorn branches?
There's something here a little bit more important than fake Viagra emails.
Sharon at Camp Lejeune, North Carolina, welcome to the EIB network.
Hello.
Hi, Rush.
Thanks for taking my call.
Yes, ma'am.
It seems to me that the carpetbaggers have never left.
The carpet baggers have never left.
They were promising the world to these people who couldn't seem to make it on their own.
And now we've got Acorn doing the same thing.
And I just am just so shocked and surprised that they're getting away with all of this, that our judicial system can't work any faster than that, unless you're a Republican, and then they've got you dead to rights.
What you have to understand here, I don't mean to sound preachy, what you have to understand here that all of this is simply an arm of the Democrat Party.
And the Democrat Party holds a lot of judgeships.
The Democrats have gotten a lot of people, a lot of judges in the judiciary.
This is all part of the Democrat Party.
What all this tells me, what it all adds up to, is no wonder they have to do this.
They couldn't win diddly squat without this.
They cannot win without cheating.
They're not even close.
This country, look, you remember the Battleground poll?
And I told you about question D3.
And for the last eight years in all the different Battleground polls in that period of time, they asked good old question D3, how do you identify yourself?
Again, 59% of Americans describe themselves as somewhat conservative or conservative.
And the people who identify themselves as liberals is in the 30%.
And that hasn't changed in eight years.
If elections in this country were genuinely fair, liberals wouldn't be winning diddley squats except in these individual congressional districts in various parts of the country, like in Massachusetts and Chicago and Los Angeles, San Francisco, places like this.
But in terms of statewide races, without this kind of cheating going on, which has been going on for 30 years, bought and paid for by the U.S. taxpayer, this is not a liberal country.
It is not a socialist country.
But these people have been working tirelessly behind the scenes to try to convince as many people.
And they've got the media.
They have got the media, and that's what makes it look like this is a country so different than what it in reality is.
We're not Marxist.
We're not socialist.
The majority of our people do not want to sit on their butts and let the government take care of them.
The majority of people in this country do not want government bailing out people that can't pay their mortgages.
Does not want people being bailed out who make irresponsible decisions.
Don't want the government owning percentages of banks.
Look at, you need any more evidence that this whole thing is rigged.
Jimmy Carter, who started this whole mortgage business or was very instrumental in it, big supporter of Acorn and so forth, he's running around as an elections judge at elections all over the world.
He's an election supervisor.
He ought to start observing and supervising his own party.
Did you hear the woman from Houston?
They couldn't find any Republicans to go be poll observers.
So Republicans are going to do it.
20,000 fraudulent registrations.
Or was it a percentage of some 20,000?
It was 20,000, right?
That were fraudulent.
Check your 30, 30% of 20,000 were fraudulent.
This, by the way, brings up something else.
If you're really steamed about this and if you really care about it, you know, you can go be a poll watcher.
You can go in there and be a poll watcher.
They might try to kick you out in there.
You're just not saying you're going to have any contact.
You're not part of the, you're not an official poll worker, but you can go in there and watch.
Or you can sign up.
You just can't walk in, but you can sign up to do it.
This is something that may be necessary to do this.
It is clear, more clear than it has ever been, the stakes to which the left and the Marxists in this country will go to take it over.
They can't win it legitimately, folks, because we are not them.
They are not us, and they are in no way, shape, matter, or form a majority.
We're close to it in this country.
Here's Obama.
Back to the audio soundbite.
This is his I Feel Your Pain Act.
He's going door to door looking for votes.
And this was on the campaign trail in Ohio.
We got a 19-year-old nursing student named Hannah.
She's very emotional here talking to Obama.
I'm paying for school myself.
How much?
How much do you indebt?
Right now, $12,000.
All right.
Well, we're going to try to see if we can provide you some relief.
Yeah, we need it.
Because the grants aren't enough.
I know.
I know.
I appreciate it.
Thank you.
Thank you.
She's paying for school herself.
We can't have that.
No, no, no, no.
Hell no.
We can't have anybody paying for themselves.
I'm paying for school.
She's even mad she's having to pay for it herself.
Can you believe that?
She's angry she's having to pay for school herself.
And Obama says, how much?
How much do you invest?
And it's unintelligible what she said there.
All right, all right.
Well, we're going to try to see if we can provide you some relief.
This is after he spoke to the plumber.
He says, want to make sure that everybody who is behind you, they get a chance for success too.
I think when you spread the wealth around, it's good for everybody.
Now, I'm going to tell you again, the majority of this people, the majority of people in this country do not think that there's something wrong when they're paying, except for their healthcare, but he's bought into the notion they should be given that.
But aside from that, the majority of people in this country do not think that paying for something themselves is a crime and they need some relief from it.
Maybe yet, maybe yet, but I'm just, this degree of cheating That is happening.
And this degree of manipulation of young people's in the schools to me is actually, I don't want to say it's a positive sign, but it does tell me that these people can't, in a legitimate arena of ideas, prevail.
They have to cheat.
And they've been cheating for 30 years.
Now, in those 30 years, they've got a lot of what they want.
They got the great society.
They got a lot of tumult and chaos.
But they haven't succeeded in their ultimate dream, but they're just three weeks away from being closer to it than they've ever been with one of their own, Barack Obama, in the White House.
Here's Barbara Boxer last night on MSNBC.
Question: Is the Democrat Party prepared today to defend the idea of a new New Deal?
I think it's a way to move forward if it's done right.
It needs to be done right.
We need to look at what abuses of power took place so that they don't happen again.
One of my worst experiences as a United States Senator was going up to some secret room and looking at pictures from Abu Ghraib, a lot of which the public has since seen.
I don't think I've ever felt so lost for my country.
And I think we need to take a hard look at that.
And as I said, do it in the right way so that this never, ever happens again.
My mistake, I gave you the wrong question.
The question she was asked: if the election was held today or tomorrow, it'd be a landslide for the Democrats.
Say it's a big win in November.
Would you support efforts to bring accountability on constitutional issues, the war crime issues that plague our ability to regain high ground and a beacon of hope?
Would you be willing to prosecute the Bush administration for war crimes?
Was the question, and she said yes.
Barbara Boxer said, We got to.
We need to take a hard look at that.
So I said, do it in the right way so this is never, ever happens again.
War crimes against Bush.
Now, that, that is Marxist.
That is Marx.
Then you take them out and shoot him, or you put them in jail for life or what have you.
Now, this is also on Morning Show today.
They interviewed Barney Frank about the mortgage crisis.
We made the mistake of assuming, and I try to protest against this, that everybody could be a homeowner.
Homeownership is a good thing, but for many people in this country, decent rental housing is the appropriate form.
And people have said to me, well, gee, don't you wish everybody could own a home?
I wish I could eat more and nut gain weight.
But I don't act on that.
At least I do more than I should.
We, I think, know better going forward.
And in fact, with regard to Fannie Mann Fredemack, I have been pushing them, and one of the things we did finally do was to create an affordable housing rental program.
Whoa, now somebody's running for the tall grass as fast as their chubby little legs will carry them here.
He's the guy that pushed everybody out of renting and into homes that they couldn't afford on purpose and called it affordable housing.
We had a guy call yesterday saying that Tom Brokoff said on the CNBC that we need to start determining the size of people's houses.
We have the bite.
He was talking with the anchorette Sue Herrera.
I wonder, she said during the Second World War, there was a certain determination.
They could get through anything, anything, and they had this faith that was unshakable.
I'm not sure that the Boomer generation has that, or perhaps just hasn't been tested.
This would be the test, certainly, but I wonder if they have that same determination.
This is not an overnight sensation we're going through.
There are lasting effects here.
There's a kind of systemic quality in many ways, and people are going to have to reorder their priorities.
Doesn't mean we're going to have to wear a sackcloth, you know, and go around and just eat gruel every day.
But there has to be a reordering of our financial system and our attitude about debt, about credit card debt.
And how big a home do you need and how much leverage are you going to prepare to play with?
That's Tom Brokaw advocating the Marxist socialist position that we need to really size of homes.
And, of course, now you've got to understand that to people like Brokaw, you're not smart enough to make the decision how much debt you can take on.
And you're not smart enough to realize how big or small your house ought to be.
So they are going to have to do it for you.
To Palm Harbor, Florida.
And is this the first guy that we've had on the phone on the show?
Yes, this is Bob.
Nice to have you on the program, Bob.
Welcome.
Bob, you're there.
Bob's gone.
We're going to Mike in Long Island.
Mike, welcome to the EIB Network.
Hello.
Thanks for taking my call, Rush.
Yes, sir.
During the Acorn with all the Acorn voter fraud, could it have possibly had an impact on the primary between Hillary and Obama?
I don't know.
Knowing what I know now, I would not say, oh, hell no.
How could you expect that?
I wouldn't have any idea.
But I think the Acorn bunch, they're registering voters around the clock.
They're registering voters around the world.
They're registering voters in every city at every opportunity for every eventuality.
Who knows?
It is something to consider.
There's no question that Acorn's in the back pocket of Obama.
Obama's in the back pocket of Acorn.
Folks, if you stop to think about something here, you look at all these fraudulent registrations.
You know what's happened?
People's identities being stolen.
Mickey Mouse has been registered.
The Dallas Cowboys starting offensive lineup has been registered in Nevada and in, where else was it?
Where did it Missouri?
This is identity theft in addition to everything else.
And if they're registering people 27 times and so forth, or a 50 times, 75 times or what have you, there's a lot of things going on here.
It just shows you how culpable any of us can be to identity theft.
And there's a way to protect yourself.
It's called Life Lock.
Even if you're one of the few that takes the proper precautions, most people don't.
What about everybody else who has your information?
You saw the headlines.
11 people just arrested for stealing over 40 million card numbers from national retailers.
There is a way to protect yourself from this.
It's called Lifelock.com.
Just go there, use the promo code RUSH, and you will get LifeLock's industry-leading protection absolutely free for 30 days.
Or you can call them 800-440-4833 or go to Lifelock.com, whichever you do, just say promo code RUSH.
Back in a moment, my friends.
A conservative research group has filed a lawsuit today against Acorn.
The group, of course, accused of fraudulently registering duplicate and fictitious voters.
The lawsuit by the Buckeye Institute filed in Warren County Common Please Court on behalf of two voters concerned their votes could be diluted by fraud.
The lawsuit seeks to dissolve ACORN using the state's Corrupt Activity Act.
This is one way of dealing with it.
If the Justice Department won't look into this, and if they're not going to look into vote fraud, what good are they?
Just flood these people with lawsuits.
Just flood them like they do everybody else.
Have a great day, my friends.
We will be back tomorrow, revved up, ready, and raring to go.