All Episodes
Previous Next
Oct. 1, 2008 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:17
October 1, 2008, Wednesday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
The views expressed by the host on this program, now documented to be almost always right.
98.8% of the time, the latest opinion audit is in from our opinion auditing firm.
Sullivan Group in Sacramento, California, greetings and welcome back, Rush Limbaugh behind the golden EIB microphone at the distinguished and prestigious Limbaugh Institute for advanced conservative studies, a drive-by media blaming me for the failure of the House bailout vote.
It happened on CNN last night.
Welcome back, 800-282-2882.
Email address L Rushbow at EIBNet.com.
I want to go back before resuming uh, ladies and gentlemen, the discussion here what really going on here with Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and so forth.
I want to replay a Barack Obama soundbite from a uh interview yesterday, ABC News John Berman talking to Obama, sorry, Obama in Reno, Nevada, said you're very persuasive man, Barry.
You have a certain amount of influence with your own party.
This is what I wish to debunk.
Could you have done more?
Should you have done more, Barry, before the House vote to lobby for votes.
Oh, absolutely not.
Uh because if you think about it, there was a deal struck between the uh Nancy Pelosi and uh the Republican leader, Boehner.
Uh the Democrats were supposed to get 120 votes.
They got 140.
So there was no sense on the Democratic side that we weren't following through on our commitments.
Uh, and apparently there were some problems on that side.
I don't think me calling House Republican members would have been that helpful.
I tend not to be that persuasive uh on that side of the aisle.
And they talk about Palin's interviews with Couric.
This guy thinks the question is he should have called Republicans, and he's not going to call Republicans because he's not that persuasive.
He's not that persuasive at people on that side of the aisle.
He's the great unifier.
He represents hope and change, a new America, a new world.
But he's not gonna try to persuade Republicans.
But here, his answer that he was handed talking points by Pelosi.
Remember now that the Congressional Black Caucus voted against the bailout.
You mean to tell me, while Obama's sitting here saying, Well, you know, I'm not that persuasive with Republicans on the other side of the aisle.
You mean to tell me that Barack Obama couldn't convince most members of the black caucus to vote for the bill if he can't persuade the black caucus, and he can't persuade the Republicans, then what good is he?
Maybe uh maybe Obama can tell us exactly what he did do to try and get the bill passed.
Obama says we should all come together, that we should all sacrifice.
It seems to me that Obama talks incessantly but does nothing.
What else does he do?
Would somebody tell me what he does besides talk?
What did he do?
Who did he call?
He didn't even sacrifice a minute of campaigning to push this bill.
He creates false scenarios to explain his inaction.
And if things go well, he takes credit for leadership.
If nothing gets done, he blames the Republicans.
The guy is a fraud.
He's a squirrel, he's a fraud.
95 Democrats voted for the bill that he says he wanted, and all he needed to do was get about 12 more of them, and he didn't because he didn't try because he didn't want to.
And now he wants to take credit if something happens after the fact and wash his hands for something that did not happen.
He guy is pathetic.
But you know, uh folks, I'll tell you something about this talking business.
I saw something today that astounded me.
William F. Buckley Jr., the founder of National Review and the father of our modern conservative movement, recently passed away.
Peace be upon him, had a son, Christopher, hasn't said Christopher is a writer, a humorist, lives in Washington, D.C., and is going to vote Obama.
Mr. Buckley's son is says he's tempted to vote for Obama because he read his books.
And his books are so well written that anybody That can write that well has to be thoughtful.
And if he thought, if he thinks that clearly, and if he's able to write that well, then, well, then maybe he's worth supporting.
And then Christopher Buckley said, but we'd have a problem if he gets in there and starts doing a bunch of liberal things like raising taxes and so forth and so forth.
So what?
I'm reading this, and I'm in stunned.
Disbelief, but it it opens my eyes to something that we all know and we've all become familiar with.
I can I can I do not have enough hands, fingers, toes, whatever, to count the number of people over the last six years, seven years when I travel around the fruited plain, Republicans and Democrats alike who get so frustrated that President Bush is not as articulate as they wish he were.
And the fact that he is not articulate leads people to believe that he's not intelligent.
So here comes Obama, and he's articulate.
elegant.
One of our commentators said he is thoughtful, he is intellectual, he is reasoned.
And I'm telling you, there are a lot of people that are being bamboozled by the ability to speak because they're ignoring what he's saying.
They're ignoring who he is and They're ignoring who his friends are.
They are ignoring his stated agenda and his policies.
All that matters is that we have somebody representing the country on television every day as president who sounds smart.
And do not underestimate this as a factor in the way certain people are going to vote.
It's telegenics, it's television, it's media.
It's it's depressing.
It's depressing is what it is, but this is where we are.
Speaking of where we are, ladies and gentlemen, do you know where we were two years ago at this very moment in time?
Two years ago.
Snerdley and I went back and looked it up.
Two years ago, going into the 06 elections on the front page of every newspaper for six weeks.
The lead item on the nightly news, the cable networks for five, six weeks.
Mark Foley, and an email sent to a page in the House of Representatives.
At the same time, we were in the third or fourth week of front page stories, editorials, and columns in the Washington Post about Macaca.
Six weeks, four weeks, every day, day in, day out, stories about George Allen and Macaca, Republican racism, Mark Foley, and emails of a sexual nature to a page in the House of Representatives.
Two years later, we have a scandal.
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mack, which dwarf Enron Worldcom.
And we do not yet have an honest portrayal, no curiosity, and no reporting of the root cause of this scandal, because it's all traced to Democrats.
So you could say upon reflection, Mark Foley, emails of a sexual nature to a page in the house, and macaca, Trump.
They are larger.
They dwarf a genuine scandal around whose necks you can place the entire noose on Democrats.
Just so you know, ladies and gentlemen, Fanny Execs did exactly what Enron and WorldCom did and got prosecuted for.
They misstated their earnings so they could hit their numbers.
During required disclosure periods, whether quarterly or yearly, report exactly or slightly above the earnings per share that had been predicted is what they did.
If you hit your numbers, two important things happen.
Wall Street assumes your company's profitable and well managed, meaning the stock price goes up and management gets its enormous bonuses.
Bonuses, which by the way, multiply an executive's base salary by a factor of two or three or more are typically triggered by hitting the earnings per share targets.
And note how this feeds on itself.
Since a lot of executive salary is in company stock, fraudulently hitting the earnings per share target means that the compensation the exec continues to pile up is more and more valuable.
This is exactly what happened at Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
It is exactly what happened.
And we frog marched all of those execs from Enron, WorldCom, Tyco.
We frog marched them into court, and we frog marched them into jail.
Ken Lay had a heart attack before serving his sentence.
What has happened here with Fannie Mae is identical, and nobody, nobody wants to talk about the blame.
Isn't that amazing?
But we couldn't get away from macaca for six weeks.
We couldn't get away from Foley and an email message of a sexual nature to a page in the house for six weeks.
But we're told the house is on fire, and we ought to put out the fire.
The arsonists are the Democrats.
They keep setting the fires.
The Republicans are the fire department.
We keep trying to put out the fires.
We get rebuffed.
When the house is burning, the Democrats say it's not burning.
You don't see any flames there.
What are you talking about?
You just are racists.
You are just trying to create a problem where none exists so that we no longer have affordable housing in this country.
We've got a scandal that makes Makaka look what it should have always been a simple little joke that was ill told.
It's worth a day on a campaign trail.
We destroyed, the media destroyed a man's career over it.
The very people who did the exact same thing that Ken Lay did, and that and that uh Kozlowski did at Tycho, and that Bernie Evers did it at WorldCom are rewarded with advisory positions on Obama's campaign, and they were also rewarded with millions of dollars.
No frog marching, no prosecutions.
So you just remember where we go, or where we were two years ago.
Remember where we are today.
We've got something going on that just makes Makaka and Foley as irrelevant as anything else you could come up with.
And yet Makaka and Foley remain bigger stories today.
Stories that have more impact on an election, more impact on events in this country than a scandal involving Democrats, Fannie Mae, and Freddie Mac that probably dwarfs Enron and WorldCom combined.
We'll be back after this.
Once again, checking the email here in the obscene profit timeout.
People say, Rush, can't you move on from this?
I mean, uh, it's gonna pass, the bailout's gonna pass, and it's gonna be, it's it's gonna, you know, let's look, let's move on.
There are other things out there.
We got Winneifull and the Palin uh Biden debate tomorrow.
We're gonna get to all that.
Let me tell you why this is important.
Let me tell you why this this blame business is important now.
Somebody is going to get blamed for this.
Right now, somebody's going to get blamed.
The Democrats have been desperate to find a Republican to pin this on, and they can't.
There isn't a Republican anywhere in sight who has any culpability in this.
But yet, before this is all over and before it's all fixed, the Democrats are gonna blame somebody, and McCain is out there saying, No, we've we've we've got a we've got to deal with the blame later.
Right now we gotta fix the crisis.
Well, the problem for Senator McCain is he Is losing ground in the polls.
I don't care why.
I'm being flooded with paranoid people concerned about how the press has destroyed Palin.
We've got polling data today that says that the media coverage of Palin is why McCain is plummeting in the polls.
I don't care why.
He's got to do something to stop it.
By plummeting, he's down six in some polls, down eight in others.
We all knew that drive-bys were going to destroy Sarah Palin.
We all knew they were going to try it.
We all know why.
She's not one of them.
It's just like Clarence Thomas, like I said, when the first assault hit on her weeks ago.
They had to destroy Thomas because he didn't go through the liberal prescriptions to get where he is.
Same thing with Sarah Palin.
So let him have at her.
We knew that was going to happen.
I don't want to go.
I can't believe we can be doing the payment.
What the there is a way to fix both of these things, but if McCain is unwilling to assign blame here, this this thing is right now, it's all economy, economy, economy, and the Democrats know it.
And the people of this country are angry.
And there is hell to pay out there right now.
And part of hell to pay is figuring out who's responsible for this.
Now Senator McCain says that he wants to stay above the fray.
That now's not the time to assign blame.
Well, the problem is he's not hearing the public.
He is not aware of the visceral rage and anger out there.
It is indeed time to assign blame.
We're talking financial destruction.
On the part of a lot of American families, somebody's gonna get blamed.
You can damn well count on it, and the Democrats are not gonna wait until January to assign blame.
They're looking as fast in fact I guarantee you right now, you know who's getting the blame for this?
McCain.
You can see it effervesc out there.
Yeah, McCain came off the campaign trail, big grandstand play, went there, settle a crisis, nothing happened, had to leave.
McCain's ineffective.
McCain didn't get anything done.
CNN blamed me yesterday, but that's inconsequential.
Now, C. Edmund Wright writes a piece today at the American Thinker called Time for McCain to Name Names.
Short of properly assigning blame to the liberal policies and politicians who are responsible for this mess, the blame will automatically fall to the current presidential administration and by extension his party, right or wrong.
That's how policies play out.
McCain has no choice now.
He will start doing what he claims he loves to do related to government corruption, naming names.
He's in that debate the other night I got worn out listening him talk about all the people from Washington who are in federal prison.
Because he went after them on corruption.
Senator McCain.
There are some people serving in Congress today, sir, that need to be federally prosecuted.
There are some people who used to work at Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac who need to be prosecuted and sent to federal prison so they can be prisonmates with all these other guys you seem happier there.
It is indeed time to name names.
Because if Senator McCain does not name names, he'll be thrown on the ash heap of electoral shame alongside Dole and George H. W. Bush and so on.
He set the stage for naming names.
He set the stage for being anti-corruption with his remarks in the first 45 minutes of the debate last Friday night.
Now, Mr. Wright says this that the good news for McCain, should he decide to grasp it is that the party against which he is supposed to be running can easily be pegged with a lion's share of the blame regarding this meltdown.
There's no doubt liberal policies on energy and housing have combined to put the country in this situation, and only unwinding these policies will lead the nation out of this problem.
Naming names properly will name a whole lot of folks with a D beside their names.
Congress, of course, is now led by the very people who put us into this mess to begin with.
If Senator McCain thinks that he can thread the needle In a bipartisan fashion here, he is mistaken, sadly.
If he does not point out the facts, then his party will take the blame for, and he will not win the election.
As far as he has run from President Bush, he will never get as far away from Bush as Obama.
He's been rambling on about government spending CEO pay, earmarks, did that in a debate Friday night.
Yawn.
None of this is pertinent unless you point out that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were Democrat earmarks, and that the worst CEO pay abuse in recent memory is Franklin Reigns.
His incentive compensation from Fanny triggered by fraudulent accounting.
McCain didn't bother to point out any of that.
We must not assign blame.
If he doesn't assign blame and go after corruption, like he claims to want to go after right now.
He's in big trouble.
All right, here we go back to the phones.
Uh, and we're gonna go to Sewell, New Jersey.
This is Catherine.
Uh glad you called.
Great to have you on the EIB network.
Thank you, Rush.
Listen, I love you, Rush.
But we need to get Senator McCain in the White House.
Get him in the White House.
Don't keep bashing him with this fair and balanced radio.
We don't hear any of these other liberal stations bashing Obama.
Get him in the White House however you can.
What do you think we're trying to do here, Mallory?
Rush, but listen, you kill me when you say things against McCain.
I killed me.
Because we're in trouble.
What am I saying against McCain?
Well, you know, you said that he needs to assign blame.
Get him in the White House, and then he'll get the blame on.
No, he w Okay, look.
All right.
I don't know as much as you do.
This is not a criticism.
It's a piece of hopeful advice.
Let me let me uh put it this in perspective for you, Catherine.
Okay.
Do you remember a hurricane call Katrina?
Yes.
Well, uh, do you remember all of the blame the Bush administration and the Republican Party got for that?
Oh, I know.
And do you realize now wait a minute now?
Do you realize that virtually all of what went wrong in Hurricane Katrina with the levees not being built right, the people not being evacuated was Democrats.
Yes.
Yes, I do.
All right.
Well, then jump forward to this.
Mm-hmm.
If what you didn't hear what I said, if McCain doesn't get involved in this, he is going to get the blame for this mess.
Yeah.
And that's gonna kill any chance he has of getting elected.
He has got to identify who is responsible for this.
They are out there is a public clamoring for this.
There's a public clamoring for a leader who relates to him who understands them, who's able to voice their anger and fix the problem so it doesn't affect them again.
Well, Nancy, I I love you, and I love what you say, and I know you're right.
It's just that I'm getting panicked because you know I don't want Obama in the White House.
That guy scares the heck out of me.
That guy's a dangerous.
He's dangerous.
I agree more forcefully than you are saying.
Plus he's a squirrel.
All right, listen, you change my mind all the time now.
I'll go with you.
This is not, I'm not being critical of Senator McCain here.
No, I know.
It may sound like it.
What I'm trying to do is is I'm just I'm just sharing my for whatever it's worth, and I know with them it's worthless because they don't trust me at the McCain campaign.
They don't particularly like me, but believe me, I'm not advising him to do things that are gonna not gonna help.
I'm not, I don't look at this is I know I know how the Democrats operate, and right now they're looking for a way to blame this on McCain, and they're very close already saying he went in there, made a big grandstand play, didn't get anything done, yada yada yada yada.
You know what, Rush?
They're gonna do that anyway.
They have killed Bush so badly.
Yeah, and guess what?
And guess what?
Bush doesn't name names either.
Bush doesn't come around and respond to it either.
And look where Bush is.
Yeah, I know.
Catherine, I'm telling you something.
This this is a war out there.
This is political war.
And the the the the aggressor in any conflict like this sets the rules.
And you can sit there and you know, so I'm gonna be honorable, I'm gonna stay above all this.
I'm not going to name names.
I reach across the aisle.
You know what that tells people?
So I'll criticize Republicans.
I'll do what I can to put corrupt Republicans in jail, but I'm not going to mess with a Democrat budge, because I like to cross the aisle.
He can't name names in one of the biggest political economic scandals in history.
Hells bells, folks, the Democrats who say this is the worst thing to happen since the Great Depression.
Or the worst thing to happen economically since World War II.
Name names.
How do we know that Senator McCain will root out corruption if he will not call for Barney Frank and Chris Dodd's resignation now?
How do we know he'll stop mindless government spending if he won't vote against it now?
The bailout bill could bail out McCain's campaign.
Instead, he's letting it be used as cover for the people who caused this is not straight talk.
You know what?
America is waiting for a sheriff to roll into Washington and clean the place up, and McCain says he's the guy.
And he's been given a golden opportunity here to prove that he is the change everybody's been waiting for.
Americans want change in a way that Obama can't even imagine.
I think McCain, I think the Republicans are looking at a series of hanging curveballs here, but because they're in Washington, because they read the neutered conservative intelligentsia media, they don't understand the golden opportunity that they have.
How about a speech that speaks truth to power, specific truth?
Do you think Main Street would like that?
You know, I just I I I think I think there's a I think there's a an opportunity here waiting to be had.
But the whole point about blame, I don't mean it to sound childish and sandbike.
No, it's your fund it's your phone.
I don't mean things.
What I'm talking about political reality.
The party in power is going to get the blame for this when they had nothing to do with it.
The party in power is going to get the blame for this.
It's just the way it works.
Somebody's going to go have to go out there and say, nope, party in power didn't do this.
Party in power tried to put the fires out.
If the guy leading the party in the presidential race is not willing to do it, well, then you figure it out.
Figure out what it all means and where it's headed.
By the way, uh, speaking of the blame, let me just read to you a portion of a Wall Street Journal story in 2006 that confirms what I have told you here about this scandal being larger than Enron.
Think back how mad you were about and think what the Democrats did.
Democrats went and got every Enron employee they could find and put him on television.
Oh, whoa, can't believe what they lie.
My investment's gone, my 401k is gone, my pigeons gone, look what Ken Lay did.
Ken Lay was a bush, but look what the Republicans did to me.
Look what they do.
Have you seen anybody supposedly hurt by this scandal paraded on television by the Democrats?
Nope.
Wall Street Journal, what's the date of this?
This is uh February 24th, 2006.
A report.
Commissioned by Fannie Mae's board depicts executives of the big mortgage company fretting about how to increase their bonuses and pursuing an investment in a small Florida bank partly to score political points.
The report by a team of lawyers headed by former Senator Warren Rudman, released yesterday morning, also says former executives misled directors about accounting manipulations that helped increase earnings and bonus payments for 1998.
It chronicles a vast array of other accounting violations and concludes that many of the mortgage finance companies' policies were, quote, motivated by a desire to show stable earnings growth and hit earnings targets, therefore bumping up the bonuses of the executives.
This is why, ladies and gentlemen, I get steam.
There is steam pouring out my ears when I turn on a TV today and I watch Obama in LaCrosse, Wisconsin, talk about Wall Street fat cats gaming the system and how that's gonna come to an end.
This is not a capitalist problem.
This is a government problem.
The thing Obama says he wants to root out, fraud.
Fat cats getting their hands on a pile of money.
It's not theirs.
Hello, Obama.
It's the Democrats who did this.
Your advisors.
Fannie Mae.
And in an ancillary fashion, Freddie Mack.
There are so many lies being told.
There is so much deceit.
There is an intricately woven web of deceit here that the Democrats have spun.
And it's just being reported hook, line and sinker.
Everybody's falling for it, hook, line and sinker.
So Obama goes out there.
I'm going to make sure there's Wall Street fat cats.
They don't do this.
They didn't do this.
To the extent they're involved, they were under the gun.
They were told to make loans to people who couldn't pay them back.
Or else.
It's just like Katrina.
Bush took the hit for this.
He didn't do anything.
It was Democrats running New Orleans.
Democrats running Louisiana screwed it up.
From evacuations to shoring up the levies to using the money they were given to shore up the levies legitimately.
You put a big pile of money in front of Democrats and they're going to find a way to get it and blame Republicans for letting them.
It's just absurd what is happening here.
This is why to me the blame game is crucial.
The blame game to me is part of the presidential election.
We may as well folks look at Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac.
What do they do?
They extended loans to people who couldn't pay them back.
This is this little not a soundbite, but just a little quote here.
This little Diddy.
Yes.
Charles Gasparino, Newsweek reporter, now at I think he's at CNBC, who covered the story, gave this theory, his theory on a December 28, 2004 edition of CNN's newsnight with Aaron Brown.
Mr. Gasparino called Fannie Mae a politically correct company.
He said, I mean, they do all the things that, let's face it, liberal journalists like.
They put home mortgages out there for poor people.
And so right now, beating up on Fannie Mae is kind of politically incorrect.
You can't do it.
You just can't do it.
This was 2004.
Can't beat up on Fannie Mae by design.
Who were they lending money?
Who are people that can't afford it?
The poor?
Minorities?
There was one story, illegal immigrant got 400 grand to buy a house.
An illegal immigrant, 400,000 to buy a house.
Or close to, I don't know if he got 400,000.
He bought a 400,000 house is what it is.
Regardless.
What do we know what we're really talking about here?
In a sense, we're talking about reparations.
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mack were used to pay reparations.
And that's why we can't take the money back by foreclosing.
Anyway.
Brief timeout as I calm down.
And we will be back and continue here right after this.
And we're back.
El Rush Ball, the cutting edge of societal evolution, as you know, ladies and gentlemen, Gwynne Eiffel, formerly NBC, now at PBS, totally in the tank for Barack Obama, no question about it.
She has a book.
She has a book coming out, Breakthrough, Politics and Race in the Age of Obama.
It's set to be released on inauguration day.
This is a conflict of interest.
She has a financial stake in Obama winning the race, in addition to what other whatever other stakes that she has invested in Obama winning the presidential race.
So McCain today, he didn't know about this.
He was on KMBZ today, our blowtorch affiliate in Kansas City.
And it was the morning news with E.J. and L and Ellen Schenk asked him a question about it.
She said is reportedly very pro-Barack Obama, this book of Gwen Eiffels.
Do you have a problem with her serving as moderator?
I don't make that judgment.
I'm I am confident that Gwen Eiffel or whoever is moderator would be fair.
I have no reason to think otherwise.
Oh, of course not.
No, why why would you widely respected I had not heard about a new book or anything else, but I believe that there's so much at stake here that anyone, including Gwen Eiffel, will be scrupulously fair to both of the candidates.
Sure.
Why why suspect Senator Mayor?
Why why why suspect that she'd be niggard than fair?
She's only got a book coming out about Obama winning the election.
She stands to make a pretty big amount of money if Obama wins.
Why why would anybody suspect that anybody in the liberal media, Senator McCain would be anything other than unscrupulously fair?
He's right.
But nevertheless, let's listen.
At uh the uh Republican convention, September 3rd, 2008, St. Paul.
The anchor on PBS, Jim Lara, speaking with correspondent Gwen Eiffel about Governor Sarah Palin's speech.
Jim Lara said, Gwen, your closing thoughts.
She belittled, and so did other speakers.
Barack Obama at every opportunity, mocking the size of his state, his community organizer status, and every time there was an explosion in this room.
We also heard uh I think the chant started earlier in the night with Michael Steele.
Every time they talked about energy search, energy research, they started chanting drill baby drill.
That was the big cry of the night.
She delivered her speech word for word.
Does it sound like she's um doesn't sound like she's too excited here?
She belittled Barack Obama at every opportunity.
Grow up, Gwen, it's a political contest.
Obama is a man child.
He deserves to be belittled and he deserves to be defeated.
Eiffel was on the front lines of the feminist assault on Palin's ability to be a mother and vice president.
September 2, 2008 news hour.
On PBS, Gwen Eiffel uh interviewed Heather Wilson, and they have this exchange about Palin.
There's also a big difference between running a state or running for as long as she's run a state and running for one of the biggest jobs in the country.
What advice do you give her on how to balance it?
She's got five kids.
She's got something challenged.
That that bothers me.
No one ever asked John Kennedy whether he could be president and be a dad.
Nobody asked Senator Obama whether he could be president and be a dad.
But because Governor Palin is a woman, they're asking whether she can be vice president and a mom.
So here's Eiffel, front lines of the feminist assault on Palin's ability to be a mother and a vice president.
But she she she should be a scrupulous.
I I I have no question about that.
Uh the conversation continued.
But she described herself in her the double standard.
I understand what you're saying.
She described herself as a hockey mom.
No, that was her self-description.
One of the greatest things about Senator Obama is that he talks about the importance of being a father and a parent.
But nobody asked whether he can do both at the same time.
We need to end the double standard.
And the double standard, I think, is not being pushed by Republicans here at the convention.
It's being asked by people in the media who should know better.
Including Gwen Eiffel, which is the person Heather Wilson there was talking to about.
So, you know, folks, uh, it it's we're we're we're wishing for things that aren't going to happen here.
He's not going to criticize, he's not going to name names, he's not going to criticize Eiffel.
We're just have to gut it up.
Got an email the other day from somebody who tried LifeLock, by the way.
I'm worried about losing my identity in this whole campaign.
I'm worried about losing my identity in the next administration.
Who are we going to be?
Somebody said I'm so glad you recommended LifeLock to me because I did what you said.
I'd never had my computer crash rush.
I didn't even know what it was, but I backed it up.
I went to life uh went to life.
Wait a minute.
I'm getting confused.
I have I have lost yeah, but but it it just it's supposed to be something else.
Let me take a brief time out.
We'll be back.
We will continue after this.
Do not go away, folks.
Stay with us.
Okay, we have to wrap up this hour, ladies and gentlemen.
We'll be back and continue.
We've got more audio sound bites, uh, and a more detailed discussion coming up of the debate tomorrow night between uh Sarah Palin and uh the Chia pet Joe Biden, and the uh the techniques that are going to be employed here by Biden and what Palin could do in response to some of the news that has uh that has hit today, particularly uh about Gwen Eiffel being the moderator having a financial stake in Obama's success.
▲
Export Selection