All Episodes
Previous Next
Aug. 25, 2008 - Rush Limbaugh Program
37:31
August 25, 2008, Monday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen.
Greetings to you thrill seekers, music lovers all across the fruited plain.
It's time for another excursion into broadcast excellence, hosted by me, Rush Limbaugh, meeting and surpassing all audience expectations on a daily basis.
Looking forward to speaking with you.
800-282-2882.
And the email address is L Rushbo at EIB net.com.
Rich Lowry, National Review Online today, had a interesting observation about Biden's speech on Saturday's acceptance speech.
She said, Ladies and gentlemen, your kitchen table is like mine.
You sit there at night before you put the kids or after you put the kids to bed, like.
Your kitchen table's like mine.
You sit there at night before you put the kids or after you put the kids to bed, and you talk, you talk about what you need, you talk about how much you're worried about being able to pay the bills.
Now the question is, does Biden still put his kids to bed because they don't live at home?
Uh I know what he's trying, is trying to trying to relate here.
His kids, by the way, are doing quite well.
We'll have details on that coming up in just a moment.
He did we I checked into this commute.
You know, his uh his uh Obama hack spokesman uh Linda Douglas today.
He's not really of Washington.
He takes a train home to Wilmington every night.
We checked the uh the Amtrak schedules, and you can figure he's spending an hour and a half each way.
He gets out at uh at the train station, as walks across the street and he's at the Capitol, unless he runs into a 7-Eleven and wants to get a cup of coffee where they speak uh Indian Americans in there, and he doesn't have an Indian accent, so it may take him a little little time in there to get them to understand that he wants a cup of coffee to walk across the street to the Capitol building, but basically he's spending three hours a day commuting.
There's let me just cut to the chase of this.
Everybody's got their in-depth analysis, but let me mention this many, many moons ago.
Here is the reason that Biden was chosen.
Two words.
White men.
That's why it wasn't Hillary.
That's why it wasn't Kathleen Sabilis.
White men.
Obama cannot win without white men.
All this talk about outreach, all this talk about you know improving the black vote and young voter registration, all that isn't every four-year Democrat myth.
The young may register, they don't show up and vote, though, in enough numbers, and despite what Ben Affleck's out there doing to gin him up.
And the white male vote, if you look at it, nine out of ten elections, the white male vote determines who wins.
And Obama has shown through the later stages of the Democrat primary process that he does not relate to them.
And he has in fact insulted them.
Now you've you've heard me say over the many years, uh, you've heard me reference the fact that certainly somewhere, the adults in the Democrat Party are someday going to realize that X is just off the charts and can't get a step up.
And I've mentioned people like Bob Strauss, uh, who's now effectively retired.
Biden, and this is not that big a compliment, but Biden is one of the quote unquote adults in the Democrat Party, goes off on tangents, and he says some stupid things, but he's uh he's he's and he's radical left in his voting uh uh as Senator,
but he's he just is the question you have to ask are are are white men that are not gonna vote for Obama gonna look at Joe Biden and see themselves in him and uh and turn around and vote Obama because they see themselves in Joe Biden.
And that's what they're up against.
He's there for one reason.
White men.
The Democrat Party continuing to be at war with itself over the convention, or trying to put this fire out, by the way, the fire that has erupted between the Clintons and the Obamas, and it's deep, and it's it's it's they're they're Clinton is mad because he they've given him an assigned speech topic.
And you don't do that to Bill Clinton.
Uh you just don't you don't tell Bill Clinton what he's gonna say, and you don't write his speech.
He wants to give a speech about his great economy in the 90s and contrast it with how bad Bush's is.
He basically wants to talk about himself.
And Hillary wants to talk about herself, and they're gonna play a Ted Kennedy style video of Hillary before she speaks.
And a lot of Obama Knights don't not crazy about this.
And then this, Howard Wolfson, top advisor to Senator Clinton, has weighed in on the tensions that exist there.
He said Hillary has done more than any runner up in the history of the Democrat Party to support and campaign for the nominee since her concession, which is an out now.
Why?
She hasn't done tidy squat.
Have you seen her there?
She hasn't done anything.
She was as as recently as last weekend was referring to O'Biden uh uh to Obama still as as quote unquote my opponent.
I know I'm I'm gonna be mangling this name.
You know, by the time I get through with this, I'm gonna be it's Obama bin Biden.
I'm gonna be saying that.
I I just did.
You know, it's one of these circumstances here, folks.
So much in my fertile mind and my mouth just can't keep up with it, even though I have a highly skilled and professional mouth.
Howard Wolfson said, after Hillary's done more than any runner-up in the history of the Democrat Party, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.
Wolfson notes there's still work to do on the Bill Clinton front, and he feels like the Obama campaign ran against and systematically dismissed Clinton's administration accomplishments, and he feels like he was painted as a racist during the primary process.
Hey, Bill, join the club.
They did play the race card on you, Bub.
Just like they play it on us all the time.
Clinton was right about that.
They did play the race card on you.
First black president.
So anyway, Howard Wolfson says Senator Obama would go a long way towards healing those wounds if he were to specifically praise the accomplishments of the Clinton presidency in a line or two during his speech.
So the big baby is now having his little spokesman go out there and tell Obama, hey man, you better mention me.
Saturday, you better.
These people, I don't care whether you're talking about Obama or Hillary or Clinton, who they all think it's about them.
All right, let's go to Pelosi.
This was on Meet the Press yesterday.
And let's see, okay.
I um uh uh I want you to hear this, and we'll comment after it.
The Tom Brookhaw said, Senator Obama saying the question of when life begins above his pay grade, whether you're looking at it scientifically or theologically, if he were to come to you and say, help me out here, madam speaker, when does life begin?
What would you tell him?
As an ardent practicing Catholic, uh, this is an issue that I have studied for a long time.
And what I know is over the centuries the doctors of the church have not been able to make that definition.
And uh, Senator Senator uh Saint Augustine said at three months.
You don't know.
The point is is that it shouldn't have an impact on a woman's right to choose.
Roe v.
Wade talks about very clear definitions of when the child uh first trimester, certain considerations, second trimester, not so, third trimester.
There's very clear decision.
You know, uh folks, this is just embarrassing.
As I as I I I've often wondered, is she genuinely this uneducated, uninformed, silly, stupid, whatever, and I've concluded there isn't a word to describe the status of her brain.
The Catholic Church doesn't know.
The Catholic Church hasn't stipulated.
The doctors at the Catholic Church?
You mean the Pope goes and consults the doctors to find really the doctors have more to say than God?
I mean, Nancy, cite anybody.
Don't cite the Catholic Church.
You're putting them in an untenable position.
You're s you're fixing it so every priest, no matter how wacko left the priest might be, cannot support you.
Good grief, ladies and gentlemen.
Uh life begins at conception.
Where else can it begin?
Peggy Noonan, Peggy Noonan had a way, she had a great way.
I'm going to paraphrase what she wrote of reducing this to its most simple.
It's it's most elemental.
If life doesn't begin at conception, then why the hell wear a condom?
If life doesn't begin at conception, then why the hell take the pill?
Well, the church doesn't allow the pill at church.
Yeah, well, it begins.
I know the church doesn't allow the pill because life begins at conception, and the church is not cool on condoms either.
Logo or otherwise.
But that's the point.
We have this is not something that we've been arguing about for centuries.
St. Augustine said life begins in three months.
Saint Augustine knew that Roe vs.
Wade was going to come along basically say the same thing.
Ed Morrissey, writing at the uh hot air blog, has done yeoman's research into this.
And he writes today that the notion that the Catholic Church declared abortion a sin at the same time as the pill is patently absurd and shows that Pelosi has either lied about studying the issue in terms of church history or lied about what she found.
Church writings specifically naming abortion as murder appear as early as 70 AD in the first written catechism of the Christian church.
Tertulian, sometimes known as the father of the Latin Church, wrote with equal clarity and force.
In our case, murder being once for all forbidden, we may not destroy even the fetus in the womb, while as yet the human being derives blood from the other parts of the body for is sus.
This is A.D. 197.
Year 197, following year 70.
The Catholic catechism is extremely clear on the nature of its position on human life, has been remarkably consistent on this point for almost 2,000 years, and it finds that position in the Old Testament.
Human life begins at conception, not at birth, not at some point consistent with Roe for convenience.
In Psalm 51, David refers to his sinfulness beginning at the moment of conception, and sinfulness requires physical life and a soul to exist.
So dare you have it in the Old Testament.
The last time I looked.
This is a giant embarrassment, or it ought to be.
And where's Brokaw?
Where is the media on this?
She got away with this kind of inane, insane rambling, trying to fit one of the most sacred religious beliefs held by Catholics all over the world into a political issue that would conform with a rogue Supreme Court decision called Roe v.
Wade in 1973.
Now, that is hubris.
That is arrogance, like I cannot believe.
She has placed herself above the doctors of the church, above Saint Augustine, as she said.
She has placed herself above the Pope, and everything the Catholic Church has ever said about this.
And of course, Brokaw just sits there, whoa, oh good.
In fact, uh Well, that's not entirely true.
Brocot did challenger on this.
I have to be honest.
It's it's one of the natural gas business that he just sat there.
He said, but wait a minute, the Catholic Church at the moment feels very strongly that life begins at the point of conception.
And this is like maybe 50 years or something like that.
So again, over the history of the church, this is an issue of controversy.
No, it's not an issue of controversy with the church.
It's an issue of controversy with the followers, with the parishioners with the flock like you.
But note the 50 years.
Life, I've always said the person's historical perspective begins with the day they were born.
And so her use of 50 years there.
Well, it's been a it's been a bone of uh contention, a controversy in the church for 50 years, meaning her adult life.
And that's what she is relating it all to.
Anyway, this is not.
Sorry to stutter here, folks.
I I just really I sit here in in stunned bewilderment and disbelief over what I consider to be not just stupidity and silliness, but arrogance and hubris.
And the uh the ignorance that these people have over how this kind of comment is gonna come back and bite her presidential nominee.
I guess she thinks that she has to provide some sort of Democrat Party interpretation of Catholicism that permits Obama to get away with infanticide beliefs back and just say I don't Now look, don't misunderstand me on this, folks.
You got a lot of liberal politicians who, for their own purposes, from Mario Cuomo to John Kerry to any number of them, will twist the Catholic Church's doctrine on abortion to fit their own, you know, personal desires to, you know, attach firmly to Democrat political policy dogma and this sort of thing.
I mean, the way Cuomo did it, and he did it at Notre Dame University, went to Notre Dame University, and he said, I'm I I'm uh, of course I understand the sanctity of life.
I'm pro-life and so forth, but I cannot impose my political will, my religious views on people.
I cannot impose my religious views on the rest of the country.
Yet he was perfectly comfortable imposing his tax deals on the rest of the country and every other view he had, but it was just a cop-out to allow him to remain pure to Democrat policy.
But Cuomo, nor Kerry, nor any of the others, has ever come along and spoken for the Catholic Church like Pelosi did yesterday on Meet the Depressed.
That's the arrogance and hubris.
That is what is, and I don't care whether Rachet say the Catholic Church's doctors or doctrines, I uh uh some people say she might have been saying doctors.
It doesn't matter.
She was speaking for the Catholic Church, and that's brazen.
And this is going to come back to bite.
This is going to come back to bite.
The the the quote unquote third most powerful woman in the United States of America telling the world what the Catholic Church's official position on life is.
The church cannot let this stand.
How they deal with it, we'll just have to wait and see.
Back to the phones.
This is Walter.
Walter in Arlington Heights, Illinois.
You're next.
I'm glad you waited, sir.
Welcome.
Thank you.
I haven't heard anyone yet mentioned the uh behavior of Joe Biden when he was interviewing Robert Bork for a position on the uh United States Supreme Court.
Uh, if it's possible for you to play any of that, I know that American people would learn something.
That man is evil.
And Judge Bork is about as fine a man as you could get, and uh Biden denied us the right to have uh Judge Bork on the Supreme Court where he would have done no end of good.
Yeah, you gotta give us time out there uh uh Walter, because we can't squeeze it all in here in an hour and a half.
We got all that.
We got with Clarence Thomas, how he carried the water uh uh with uh, you know, anti-Clarence Thomas.
Well that's the point.
I mean, Biden has participated in the attempt to destroy the lives, not just careers, of uh a number of eminently qualified Americans carrying the water for the Democrat Party and the American left, and all these things will be replayed.
See, what the the the the arrogance of the of liberal Democrats is in fact, let me go to this story right now.
This this is something that this is an eye-opener for you.
You know as well as I do, the Democrat Party and American liberals run around thinking that they represent the vast majority of the thinking, if not the party affiliation, of the thinking of the people of this country.
Now, the American media, the drive-bys in the American left, are far more, for example, obsessed on race than the American people are.
The American people, you've been there, done that, they can see the situation improving.
We're not obsessed with it.
They are.
They're obsessed with race.
So you have a black guy like Clarence Thomas come along, eminently qualified, far more experienced than, say, Obama has, far more experienced than a lot of other nominees that have come up.
And you've got Obama saying, well, he's not even qualified.
He says, I didn't think he was qualified.
And I don't think he's that smart.
Now, why does Obama think this?
Obama's never read what he's written.
If he did, he would see that Clarence Thomas has written opinions that agree with Obama in certain certain cases, at least as Obama has stated.
And it really just boils down to what is and how you define liberalism, which we've spent countless hours and days and weeks on this program doing.
But when you have an American liberal, I don't care what their s r uh race, religion, when you have an American liberal look at a black guy who is not a liberal.
There is one thing.
Uncle Tom, deserter, stupid, no black person in America can possibly think what Clarence Thomas thinks, or what Thomas Sowell thinks, or what Walter Williams.
They just can't.
It's not even worth exploring.
It's not even worth examining.
They just, they're traitors.
And they are treated like traitors by the American liberal establishment.
And they have to be destroyed, too.
And, you know, in Clarence Thomas's case, it was very clear why.
Here was a man who had, by his virtual assist uh uh ascension to the Supreme Court with his ascension, and with the the just impeccable life that he had led up to the point of his nomination.
Here's a guy who put the lie to every tenant of the left's prescription on civil rights, that you can't get anywhere without the civil rights coalitions of this country on the left being behind you, pushing you, and uh setting the stage for you.
Because America's so racist, America is so imperfect, that only the concerted efforts of leftists can see to it that black people can get it.
Here's Clarence Thomas who got everywhere he did without them.
That posed one of the biggest threats to them ever.
The most powerful black man in America on the Supreme Court fighting what they believe.
They couldn't allow that.
So he's dumb.
He's stupid, he's unqualified, case closed, never even asked to prove it.
Ha!
Welcome back, great to have you.
L. Rushbone, a cutting edge.
The usual, this is almost predictable too.
Every uh every two years and every four years in a presidential election, I go to the email, and of course the libs, Livster ready.
Is that all you got to say?
Is that all you guys think they're libs?
You always think the same thing.
You're just a broken record, and lib, lib, lib, lifeb.
Well, there's a reason.
Libs lose.
And this election is going to come down to what every other election comes down to, and that's turnout.
It's going to be turnout, it's going to be, you know, what kind of grassroots organizations McCain have versus Obama's.
Bruce Walker, writing at the AmericanThinker.com, says the battleground poll, and particularly question D three, is crucial to understand this country.
In the first 15 pages of poll results from the Battleground poll.
Battle ground poll, by the way, is the bipartisan poll.
Ed Goaz on the Republican side, Celinda Lake on the Democrat side, and their questions never change.
They're just, they're consistent.
And it is it is a good poll with a great track record.
So Mr. Walker says he always zips through all the mundane polling data, goes straight to question D three, which very quietly and totally ignores and proclaims the biggest missing story in American politics, and which is the only story in the long run that really matters.
I have been tracking question D three for a long time.
Since June of 2002 in 13 straight battleground poll results.
Americans respond to this question more consistently than to any other question in those 13 battleground poll surveys.
People may change their opinions dramatically about Iraq or President Bush or drilling for oil, but not their answer to question D three.
The battleground polls differed.
It's bipartisan, a Republican polling organization, a Democrat polling organization collaborate in picking the questions, selecting the sample population, conducting the surveys, analyzing the results.
The battleground poll website, along with the raw data, is Republican strategic analysis and Democrat strategic analysis.
There are few polls that are bipartisan.
And no other polling organization asks the same questions year after year.
None that reveal the internals of their poll results so completely, and none ask anything like question D three in every survey.
What is question D3?
And what were the results to question D three in the August 2020 battleground poll?
It's this.
Here's question D3.
When thinking about politics and government, do you consider yourself to be very conservative, somewhat conservative, moderate, somewhat liberal, very liberal.
In August 2008, Americans answered question D three this way.
Twenty percent, very conservative.
Forty percent, somewhat conservative.
For those of you in Rio Linda, that is up to 60% who consider themselves conservative.
Two percent said they considered themselves to be moderate.
The independents, great moderates in American history.
And yet we're told that they are 20% of the electorate.
Twenty-seven percent said they were somewhat liberal, and nine percent said they were very liberal.
That's a total of thirty-six percent to sixty.
Sixty percent conservative, thirty percent liberal.
Question D three, battleground poll five days ago.
Three percent of Americans did not know or refused to answer.
Now, as Mr. Walker writes here, 60% of Americans consider themselves conservative.
Does it mean that most Americans don't know what it means?
No, the question specifically provides an out to people who are not sure about their ideology.
It provides an out to people who want to be considered moderate.
If you don't know that you're conservative or liberal, you can always put moderate.
Americans reject the choice of moderate.
The overwhelming define themselves as conservative.
This is a huge political story, except that it's not new at all.
If you look at the 13 battleground poll results over the last six years, and how Americans answer the same question, it hardly varies.
In the June 2002 poll, 59% conservative, September 2003, 59% conservative.
In uh April 2004, 61% conservative.
It doesn't vary it from 63 to 58% consider themselves conservative from 19 or from 2002 on.
The percentage of Americans, thus, who define themselves as somewhat liberal or very liberal has always been puny.
In 13 straight polls, this percentage has never been higher than 38% June 2004.
It has usually been much lower.
The gap between self-defined conservatives and self-defined liberals has been as high as 30 points and as low as 21 points.
So what is this translate into an electoral politics?
Well, if conservative presidential candidates simply got all the conservative votes, if virtually all moderate voters, uncommitted voters, and liberal voters went for the liberal candidate, then the conservative candidates would win in a landslide bigger than Reagan in 1988.
Have you ever wondered why liberals like Obama never call themselves liberals?
Why they want to be called conservatives?
Maybe their advisors have read the battleground poll internals to question D3.
It goes on to say that these people in this poll are not pressured to answer in any particular way This is a bipartisan poll, a Republican and Democrat pollster, and no pressures applied to anybody to answer in a specific way.
Why then do other polls show Americans so different from conservatives?
The short answer is that other polls are scrupulously constructed to hide the tsunami of conservative opinion in America on abortion, for example.
Polls will report that Americans define themselves at least as much as pro-choice as they do pro-life, but it's just not true.
The pro-choice advocates nationally oppose bans on partial birth abortion, oppose parental notification, and oppose counseling on abortion.
Led by men like Obama, the pro-choice position is quite simply that a woman always has a right to choose an abortion.
But polls don't show that's support for that at all.
And he gives results.
We'll link to this at uh at Rushlimbaught.com.
And this, ladies and gentlemen, explains uh quite a bit.
Like everything in the that the left does from entertainment to higher education, the structure, the format, and the revealed results of information is conformed to present an image in which conservatives and their values are as invisible as blacks in the antebellum South.
This is why I have been so frustrated over the years when the Republican Party decides to go out and try to get the two percent of the American people that call themselves moderates, and some of the 36% that call themselves conservatives or liberals.
When sixty percent of the American people since 2002 in the same poll have identified themselves as very conservative or somewhat conservative, it makes no sense for the Republican Party to abandon conservatives.
It's like Senator McCain.
You know, he's putting on a big push for Mrs. Clinton's voters right now.
Which I understand because the drive-bys are full of stories about how angry Hillary's voters are.
But he wouldn't even need them.
If he would reach out to conservatives the way he's reaching out to the Clinton voters.
There's a reason Ronald Reagan won two landslides.
It wasn't marketing and packaging.
It was the overall conservative majority of the American people found in a candidate, one who was them.
And it forever remains a mystery to me why the Republican Party wants to throw that aside, not only the blueprint, but the knowledge.
It is as though their own polls do not get this answer right.
These polls obviously differ from any internal poll from McCain's camp to Obama's camp.
Why doesn't Celinda Lake, for example, the Democrat in the battleground poll, why doesn't she go out and warn the Obamas of the Well, you know, you you don't have a chance here.
If McCain ever straightens out and goes full f full boar conservative, gets a full bore conservative vice presidential running mate, you guys are going to be toast.
There was a reason that there was so much enthusiasm for McCain after the saddleback church for him.
It was the most conservative he had been.
And you'll note, you will note that the drive-bys knew it, and the Democrats knew it, the Obama camp knew it.
Because it was move on fast to try to change the subject, or shore up the sad performance.
And so, folks, this is this is what is so frustrating to people like me, who are just instinctively understand where the American people are.
By the way, if 60% of the American people are conservative, and they say I'm preaching to the choir, it's a pretty big choir.
We'll be back.
Stay with us.
Have you ever wondered, ladies and gentlemen, why every four years the Democrat Party tries to convince voters that they have values that conservatives care about?
Remember how stunned they were after the 04 election when the exit polling data came out and they found out that uh values voters thought the Democrats were just weak on all this.
And so for a week or so, yeah, we gotta shore up our uh we've got to shore up our um um uh image here on uh values, which meant they got to find a way to lie to people and try to tell them they have the same kind of values they do, but the Democrat Party doesn't.
This country is not a liberal country.
This country doesn't like to lose wars.
This country doesn't like the majority of people in this country do not like hearing their country ripped and trashed by a presidential nominee on foreign sorrel or on domestic soil.
And the values voters in this country are not going to be fooled by a convention show of values, and they're not gonna be fooled by Nancy Pelosi attempting to tell the people of this country that the church doesn't believe what it believes.
And this is how they have to go about it.
They're sitting ducks is the point.
They are political sitting ducks.
If there ever became again a Republican Party with the courage and conviction to just go pedal in the metal conservative.
All right, Joseph in Palm Coast, Florida.
It's uh great to have you on the program, sir.
This this place was in the path of faith.
You guys got a lot of rain up there, right?
Hi.
Hi.
Uh uh I'm a uh former Catholic priest and uh Jesuit.
And uh what now wait a minute, you have to educate me.
What's a former Catholic?
Well, I I was dispensed by uh Pope Paul VI about thirty five years ago from the obligations of the priesthood.
I see, okay.
And uh, but I I I still have I I I'm still a priest, and uh in times of emergency I can uh absolve from sin when someone's in danger of death.
I see.
Last rights.
Yeah, but uh but I study theology.
Uh listening to uh uh Pelosi, she she is misrepresenting what the Catholic Church teaches.
For one thing, the theologians don't teach what the Catholic Church teaches unless it's accepted by the church.
Uh, St. Augustine.
Well, you can go to the Catholic encyclopedia.
You can go anywhere you want.
This is just this is just a flat out expedient political lie.
Right.
But pe people don't know that.
The people don't know how the church is the Chief, you know, one thing.
Well, wait a minute.
Wait a minute, wait a minute.
Just a second here, Joseph.
The Catholics know it, and there are a lot of them.
And the Democrats are going to need them, and that's one of the reasons they put Biden on the ticket because he's a Catholic.
But this isn't gonna apply.
The Catholics know what's what.
Right.
You know, uh They may get mad at the Pope now and then, but Nancy Pelosi is not going to be accepted as redefining church doctrine, no matter what their political points of view are.
Uh, I don't know.
Some people might go along with them, but she's misleading the public about where the church's teaching comes from.
The Pope is she not misleading, she's lying.
Okay, if you want to say that.
I do want to say that.
Yeah.
Uh you know, Jesus Christ would not start a church that would lead men into error.
That's why the Pope is infallible in matters of faith and morals.
And he can't make an error when he officially teaches the Catholic uh doctrine.
He can't make an error.
He can't tell people something that's going to lead them into error.
And when a council uh uh defines something, it must first have the approval of the Pope before it becomes officially Catholic doctrine.
And and the Pope, as we all know, is not Nancy Pelosi.
And we know that Pelosi would never be the Pope.
The question is, Pope Benedict is gonna hear about this if he hasn't.
He cares.
He's the Pope.
He cares about the Catholic.
The most powerful woman in the United States of America has just lied about his church.
This has got something has to has to has to happen here at some point.
I don't know what.
I don't know what steps public the Catholic Church takes in a situation like this.
But the first thing that is going to happen is American Catholics are going to hear about it on this program, just like we have not forgotten.
Do you know that the drive-by media nowhere, no place, no how has played Barack Obama when the cameras had shut down in Chester, Virginia last week, praising China and its infrastructure and saying that we that has not made it to the drive-bys.
It will.
And if it doesn't make it the drive-by, it's going to make it the American people, because we're not going to let go of that.
Just like we're not going to let go of this.
This is not just about abortion.
This is about the hubris brazen arrogance of a foolish, dangerous woman who, as secret who is the speaker of the House, is on a mission of total folly.
Making a mockery of not only sacred beliefs, but common sense and intelligence on a daily basis.
This is the woman who said that Obama is a gift from God.
His leadership and talents are a gift from God.
So if that's how they're going to appeal to the values voters, and if they want to bring abortion up, if they want to bring it up in this campaign, we're going to welcome it.
We will welcome them bringing it up again.
They cannot win on this, no matter how they have fooled themselves.
The American people did not vote Roe versus Wade, a bunch of liberal judges on the Supreme Court wearing black black robes did it.
And the American people have never had their say on it.
And this is another way the liberals fool themselves into thinking they are the majority.
When they are not.
We have time to squeeze one more in here.
I think Steve from uh Kentucky.
Steve, welcome to the program.
We have about a minute here.
Can you get it set in that time?
Uh I'll do my best.
Uh thanks for taking the call.
Um I'm a huge fan.
Thank you.
Uh some of the political scientists I've read have uh typically agreed that uh for a Democrat to win a national election, they need to carry the Southern Conservative Democratic vote.
My question is, I don't think Obama can do that, but I want to know what you think about that.
No, I that's why O'Biden has been the pick.
Right.
O'Biden is that's that's why it was not Hillary, that's why it wasn't Kathleen Sabiliswise.
It wasn't going to be a woman.
Uh it that he has to get white men.
I don't care where they're from.
He's got to get white men.
They determine who wins elections, especially in this one.
And uh he's he's alienated the very people you're talking about.
That they've they've heard about how he referred to them as bitter clingers, cling their guns and religion when things aren't going well, and they run into people who don't look like them.
So Biden's there to uh to counter that.
I don't I don't think Biden is the guy to successfully get uh that kind of voter for Obama because those voters are not smart and they know they're not voting for Obama or Biden.
They're voting for Obama.
And it hospital that Michelle Obama works at does not accept uninsured poor and minority patients.
Michelle Obama's hospital farms him out to other area hospitals.
▲
Export Selection