All Episodes
Previous Next
Aug. 5, 2008 - Rush Limbaugh Program
35:46
August 5, 2008, Tuesday, Hour #3
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Say, did you did you people hear about this uh the Obama campaign, as you know, all upset about the Paris Hilton and Brittany Spearshead.
Because they they don't it's it's racist for one thing, the phallic symbols of the uh the victory tower and the Washington Monument in there, and uh women who are known to be scantily clad at times, but were not in the ad with a black guy.
I mean, they it's a racist thing.
They also didn't like the fact they were trying to portray Obama as a celebard, you know, as no different than a B celebrity like some of these other pop culture tarts are.
And uh it turns out, it turns out that Obama was uh was the first to compare himself to Paris Hilton, not McCain.
Obama did this himself.
Yes, ladies and gentlemen, our friends at Newsbusters came up with this.
They went back to their own archives, February 24th, 2005 Washington Post article.
There's nothing exotic or complicated about how phenoms are made in Washington, and more to the point how they are broken.
Andy Warhol said we all get our 15 minutes of fame, said Barack Obama.
Well, I've already had an hour and a half.
I mean, I'm so overexposed, I'm making Paris Hilton look like a recluse.
So Obama has already compared himself to Paris Hilton as um McCain didn't break any new ground there.
Greetings, welcome back, Rush Limbaugh, the EIB network, Limbaugh Institute for Advanced Conservative Studies.
Telephone number is 800-282-288-2, if you want to be on the program.
From the New York Daily News, Bill Clinton regrets some things he said and didn't say on the campaign trail, but there's one thing he still can't utter, and that is that Barack Obama is ready to be president.
Kate Snow of ABC News was interviewing Clinton and uh said, Do you think uh after all he's he's ready?
He's qualified, and Clinton said, you know what?
I mean, you you can argue that nobody's ready to be president.
I mean, you you can argue, even if you've been vice president for eight years, that no one can really be fully ready for the pressures of the office.
Uh it never no, he just will not say it.
He just will not say that Obama's qualified.
He said his wife was, but of course, it's his wife, what's he gonna say?
Uh Clinton and uh his wife argued in uh nearly every speech that she was ready to be president on day one, obviously, but that Obama still today is not.
I saw the uh saw the audio, saw the video of this uh this morning just before the uh the program began, and it was just it was funny to watch.
Uh, you know, I don't think anybody's qualified.
How do you know anybody's qualified?
I mean, uh when I became president, I mean I learned things in there.
I didn't know what was going on before I got there.
I mean, who thought I was well, he was right about that.
A lot of us thought he wasn't qualified.
But you know what he said, hey, look, as not for me to say, the Constitution defines the qualifications for president.
Constitution is the one that does that, and then as long as he meets quas qualifications of the Constitution, then I got nothing to say about it.
Now, this is a former Democrat Party president who will not endorse the current nominee.
In fact, uh, ladies and gentlemen, they haven't even decided if Clinton's going to have a speaking role at the Obama convention.
Now we do know that Cheney will not be at the McCain convention.
We do know this.
I happened to learn of this two or three weeks ago.
Uh the McCain people don't want Cheney there.
They don't.
I'm no, that's they don't want, they they want to try to keep as much distance between the Bush administration and the convention as they can.
So uh Vice President Chaney was informed that uh he would not have a speaking role at the at the convention this year.
And I don't I don't know what they're going to do about President Bush, as far as the convention is concerned.
But they look at they read these polls and they do believe, they have they believe that that Bush will kill them if Bush is seen there, if Bush is associated, Cheney, they think the people of this country hate the administration so much that it will ruin them.
And I I think that's it's a little sad, a little tragic because the president is not hated.
But when you see, here's the thing that you have to keep in mind, and we've we've the the McCain people have said this themselves this in recent weeks, recent days.
They are aiming for people who are not traditional Republicans in order to try to win this race.
And so you might see Lieberman speak, but not Cheney, yes.
At the Republican National Convention.
Yes.
No, they've not asked me to speak.
They will not ask me to speak.
I'm not even going there.
I can't, I'm not going to either convention.
I've been asked, but hell, Al Jazeera.
I got the details.
Al Jazeera wants to do an interview, a full 22-minute interview with me of some 30-minute show that they have.
And they pitched, I just saw the pitch.
They reached 170 million English-speaking people around the globe.
And they want to talk to me about the Republican Party and so forth, but I'm not going to be up there.
I'm not, I'm I'm too famous to go to that thing.
If I if I go to those conventions, it'd just it'd be a nightmare.
I'm not.
Plus, I can't, it's very difficult for me with my cochlear implant to remote the program from outside one of my two studios.
It's very problematic.
And I can't go to these conventions and not do the radio show.
Yeah, but I don't I'm not, I don't, it's just too big, it's too big a hassle.
It's too, it's not if if my hearing were normal, I can go one here.
I could do it from a phone booth.
But I, you know, so much legwork to get uh stations prepared with uh right electronics and so forth.
I know when I go, I'm more popular than the candidate.
That's why I say I'm too famous to go to the Republican National Convention, and I would be too imperiled if I showed up as a Democrat National Convention.
So they won't snartly, would you get you're gonna have to accept the fact that people like me will not be speaking at the Republican convention.
I've never been asked to speak at a Republican convention.
Why and I don't want to be.
What why why would you expect that to change now?
Back to Clinton, okay?
Because you got one more Clinton story here.
This is from the uh the Boston Globe.
President Clinton acknowledged in an interview that he regrets some of his comments during the Democrat presidential nomination, but he denies that he made racist statements about Obama.
Asked whether he blames himself for his wife's loss.
Clinton said there are things that I wish I'd urged her to do, there are things I wished I'd said, or things I wished I hadn't said, but I am not a racist.
I never made a racist comment.
I did attack Obama personally.
They played the race card on me.
And you know he's right about that.
They did, they played the race card on him.
I know you gotta give Clinton cut him some slack here because he's right.
I bragged on Senator Obama hundreds of times out there.
And he's in Rwanda, by the way, over there apologizing.
Uh he's continuing his private foundation work to fight AIDS in Africa.
I never was mad at Senator Obama.
I think everybody got a right run for president who qualifies under Constitution.
I'd be the last person to begrudge anybody uh their ambition.
This is three weeks now.
This third, the third day of this rather.
The third day of all this racist stuff, and it all bubbles up from the uh from the from the Democrat campaign.
And the politico has a story by uh I can't tell people Ben Smith.
Race card flap reopens Clinton camp wounds.
And this uh this story is uh always read a paragraph to you.
When John McCain's campaign manager last week accused Obama of playing the race card, the Clintons or their supporters could have provided a powerful rebuttal.
Instead, they were silent and in private, some even quietly cheered.
Because the Obama camp did play the race card against Clinton.
No question about it.
Quick time out, we'll come back.
Your phone calls, and I still have some audio soundbites to get through here, too, so lots to do.
And we'll be back before you know it.
Stepin Wolf.
Run me baby, rock me, baby.
All night long.
Look me, me.
You gotta hear this.
This is the Messiah, Barack Obama, this morning in Youngstown, Ohio at a campaign event, making fun of the concept drill here, drill now.
Instead of offering a real plan to lower gas prices, the only energy prom uh energy plan that he's really promoting is more drilling.
I want to drill here, I want to drill now.
I don't know where he was standing.
I mean I think he was in a building somewhere.
Keep talking.
Keep talking, Barack.
Keep making oil the enemy.
Keep making energy the demon.
Keep demonizing this.
Keep making fun of it.
You don't have the slightest clue how ticked off people are about the gas price, and they are not confident this plunge in oil prices is going to translate to much at the pump because they're not confident it's going to stay down.
Everybody's predicting 150 bucks a gallon again before the end of the year.
I don't frankly do that, but this is what the experts say.
But go ahead, go ahead, Obama, make fun of it.
Go ahead and make fun of the effort that some think is necessary to increase our supply of oil.
Go ahead and let's if you know if new drilling is bad, Obama, isn't all drilling bad?
Shouldn't we just shut down all drilling?
If drilling is bad, drilling is bad.
No qualifications.
We're drilling now.
We're drilling in a lot of places.
We got even more oil we could get by drilling.
But we can't do that.
Why?
What is the problem with this?
I asked that rhetorically, because I know exactly what Obama's afraid of.
He is afraid of independent market prosperity.
He's afraid of lower gas prices.
He's afraid of things that will come along to expand people's liberty.
He wants the government in charge of all this.
He wants the Democrat Party for the next three or four months want you suffering.
They want you angry.
They want you in pain.
They want you laid off with unemployment benefits.
They want you on food stamps.
They want you suffering and they want you blaming George Bush for it.
And they want you blaming McCain for it because he's in the same party.
So go ahead, Senator, go ahead and make fun of it.
But at some point, somebody's going to ask you.
If drilling is bad, then why drill anywhere?
One other thing, the New York Times, and everybody on the drive-by is trying to explain why the gasoline price is going down.
I'm sorry, the oil price.
And we discussed this yesterday, ladies and gentlemen.
All of a sudden now we're back to the villain being big oil because the speculators apparently are losing money.
They're not, but that's what it looks like because the price is going down.
So it's not the speculation.
Speculators are off the hook now.
The oil price is going down.
The big profits were announced by big oil ExxonMobiles must be they are back to being the demons.
So listen to this passage from the New York Times as all these wizards of smart try to figure out why the barrel price of oil is plunging.
While it is difficult to pinpoint the exact cause for daily market moves, some analysts pointed to weather forecasts, predicting that the tropical storm hitting the coast of Texas would bypass major drilling platforms and refineries.
That would mean no serious disruptions to domestic oil supplies, which some had initially feared.
Now, how many of you, upon hearing that explanation from the New York Times, say, yeah, okay, it makes sense.
Speculators are worried the storm's gonna knock out some rigs.
Now it's not gonna knock out any rigs, so uh there's no panic.
Let's let's make sure we understand the New York Times and the libs correctly.
This was nothing more than speculation.
Where the storm would go, because nobody knew.
I mean, we had educated guests, but it could have heard often.
We didn't know.
Led speculation about a disruption in drilling.
And that was keeping the price artificially high.
But speculation about, or maybe the reality of drilling is a gimmick that would make no difference.
How in the world can the oil price be explained this way?
If a storm is approaching rigs and all of a sudden it's not gonna hit the rigs, and therefore drilling is not going to be interrupted, i.e., if drilling is a good thing, that will keep the price down.
Then why in the hell does Obama and the Democrats get all kinds of credit for trying to save the planet by stopping drilling?
Because the oil price on speculation.
Speculation that the rigs would survive Eduardo went down.
Meaning drilling would continue.
Drilling is good.
Drilling would keep the price low.
And there's Obama making fun of drilling.
In a sane political environment, Barack Hussein Obama would be a laughing stock, along with much of his party.
Let's go to St. Louis.
Brian High, thanks for calling the EIB network.
Hi, Rush.
Thank you for taking the call.
Yes, sir.
A couple of times I've heard you discussing the $700 billion in the Pickens plan, and you're discussing peripheral elements of it.
Things like, oh, it's Americans paying the money, and that uh uh things like that.
And I don't think that's the biggest issue.
The biggest issue is he's talking about energy independence.
Now, isn't the overall goal of energy independence a good thing, whether it be through increased domestic drilling, alternative energy sources, and all these other things, don't we want to keep this flood of money from going overseas, and wouldn't it be better to keep it here in America?
Uh not necessarily.
I mean, not not that's that's not an automatic axiom as far as I'm concerned, but my problem is I believe in trade.
Uh uh we we're never gonna have all of everything we need.
But that's my no that's not my beef with T-Bone.
To call this a transfer of wealth is unnecessarily inaccurate and frightening to people who don't understand it's not a transfer of wealth, it's an exchange of wealth.
I would agree with that, but wouldn't you rather exchange with the gentleman down the street rather than with the uh people overseas?
Uh no, not necessarily.
I prefer to be able to do that.
And if I could set up a trading system domestically with a domestic supplier, boy, I'd rather do that and help my fellowship.
But you know what food on his plate.
Dirty little secret.
Let's say we open up a bunch of new wells in the next seven or ten years, and let's just say hypothetically that we have tripled.
I should say, let's say we've doubled our domestic supply.
That domestic supply, my man, is gonna be on the world market.
If we try to keep that oil exclusively for use in the United States, we are going to dramatically artificially affect the price.
So a lot of people think they're being bamboozled into believing we drill our own oil, we keep it here.
That's not what's happening, because it's a global product, subject to global market forces, therefore global price pressures and constraints.
I wouldn't argue with that at all, but we are then feeding more Americans too, because more Americans are providing that oil.
So why not have a bigger piece of that world supply?
I'm all for having a bigger piece of the world supply.
Great.
But it sounds like when you're sort of picking out this Pickens plan in the bit, it seems like the bigger issue that Pickens is bringing up is let's get independent with energy.
And I'm all for that, and I think we ought to figure out the way to do that.
And it will include more domestic drilling as well as other alternative sources.
That it sounds like you're arguing against the bigger.
No, of course I'm not opposed to independence.
I'm not opposed to making sure we don't depend, but the the whole idea of dependence is a little bit of a straw dog, too, because you know we are a major buyer.
They are sellers.
They will harm themselves, not selling to us.
If they they will it's never gonna be the case.
I don't care how much he huffs and puffs, Hugo Chavez is never gonna stop selling us oil.
Neither will our friends the Saudis, and neither will whoever else we buy it from.
As number one is Canada and Mexico and the Saudis are three.
We everything is too interlinked here.
Uh one one of the myths supporting and or surrounding this uh dependence on foreign oil is the lie that the Democrats tell that the money that we're spending goes to terrorists.
That the terrorists are equipped with a taking the money and so forth because they're poor and they're poverty stricken, and that's why they hate us.
I mean, so much of this is convoy.
The terrorist leaders are not poor, they're not anything of the sort.
I will continue this when we come back.
This is Music Maestro Barry White conducting the Love Unlimited Orchestra.
The title of the tune is My Sweet Summer Sweet.
The title of the tune is My Sweet Summer Sweet.
All right, now let's go back to dependence on foreign oil business.
I'm all for having more of our own supply on the world market.
I'm I'm all for more having us have an insurance policy on and having our own oil.
Because you never know what's going to happen some of these supplies overseas.
They're going to be under assault by terrorists themselves.
I'm not against I'm all for it.
Don't misunderstand, but I'll tell you what.
The answer's not wind, and the answer is not solar.
The answer is natural gas.
The answer is oil.
And this business that the Democrat put I don't Boone Pickens put him in the equation, take him out of the equation, it doesn't matter.
It's very simple.
The Democrat Party has nobody who is willing to take any action that's meaningful on becoming independent when it comes to they are standing in the way of it.
My friends, there is no possible way.
It is it is impossible at the moment.
It will be impossible in ten years to replace oil.
There's nothing else that can do it.
Nothing else on the horizon that will replace oil.
It ain't going to happen.
Demonizing oil, demonizing energy.
And the people of doing this are also demanding we become energy independent.
And yet they want to invest in all of these so-called alternatives that have not been proven to do a diddly squat.
For what reason?
How can a group of people be so devoid of pure common sense?
Here, let me give you a couple audio sound bites.
Last night at Larry King Live, the all-knowing and renowned energy expert, Labor Secretary Robert B. Reich, was Larry's guest.
And King's first question, Professor Rice.
Doesn't it seem logical to drill?
That's not logical, Larry.
I mean, what we know from the energy department and many It's not logical to drill.
So I'll tell you what, Labor Secretary Reich, call the Saudis and say stop drilling.
You call Chavez and tell him to stop drilling.
And you call a Canadians and you tell them to stop drilling, and you call a Russians and tell them to stop drilling, and you call a United Arab Emirates and the Cutter people and the people of Kuwait, you tell them to stop drilling, and then you call Ahmadinezad, you tell him to stop drilling, and then you tell our friends in Iraq to stop drilling.
Make everybody stop drilling.
If drilling is illogical, then let's stop it.
This is insane.
This is insane.
This is nothing.
Cue that up to the top.
This is nothing more than the empty rhetoric of a political agenda which is devoid of any devotion to the principles of this nation's founding.
The rhetoric coming from the likes of Reich and these clowns on the left is about nothing more than creating a more perfect socialist country.
With them in charge of it.
Let's close the wells in California.
Let's shut down the wells in a gulf.
Let's tell the Chicoms that they can't drill with the Cubans.
Let's tell Mexico to stop drilling Labor Secretary Reich.
Now he's not this big a fool.
Okay, maybe he is.
Here's the whole thing.
That's not logical, Larry.
I mean, what we know from the energy department and many other sources is that if we drill for more oil right now, we're not going to see the results for seven or eight or ten years, and the results, say the Energy Information Administration, are going to be negligible in terms of prices.
I mean, the only way of weaning ourselves off the addiction of oil is to invest as Senator Obama wants to in alternatives, uh, non-fossil-based fuels, uh, wind, uh biomass, uh, water, other fuels that will allow us over the long term to create five million new jobs to be the center of alternative energy for the country.
All right, now.
Here's another thing.
We all know what addiction is, and we all know what addicts are like.
Do you think of yourself as addicted to oil?
Will you do anything to get a barrel of oil?
Will you do anything to fill your car up with gasoline?
Will you go out and steal from somebody to fill up your tank with gasoline?
This notion that we are addicted to oil is akin to saying we are addicted to air, or that we are addicted to water, or that we are addicted to food.
Or that we are addicted to sunlight.
Oil is every bit as much a factor and presence of nature as is anything else that is found on this planet.
Yeah, he said something about you know water converting water into some sort of energy.
We got states already suffering with water shortages, it is.
Some states are in droughts.
You got water fights in California, got water fights going on here in Florida, then Georgia, they're monumental, and North Carolina already.
This is just, and all of this stuff that he mentioned is a pipe dream.
But here's the second bite.
Uh Larry King says, Well, well, wait a minute.
Didn't therefore we make a mistake years ago?
Because you're you're talking seven or eight years.
If we'd done this seven or eight years ago, meaning drilling, we'd have that oil now.
Larry, our big mistake seven or eight or ten or fifteen years ago was not investing in alternative energies.
Wind and solar and and all sorts of energies that don't pollute the atmosphere that provide good jobs to Americans.
Uh you know, Obama's plan would and it also.
Stop the tape.
You just heard the former labor secretary in the Clinton administration, Robert B. Rice, say that we did not seven or eight years ago, or ten or fifteen years ago, invest in alternative energies, wind and solar.
Yeah.
Is that really?
Labor Secretary Rice, would you tell me why I saw a bunch of damn windmills puckmarking the countryside when I arrived in California in 1984?
Try 24 years ago, sir.
Would you explain to me why there are windmills and all these other I had solar panels on my house in Sacramento in 1985, sir?
Solar and wind have been around a long time, sir.
For us to have windmills today, they had to be in a design stage and a permit process phase and all that years ago.
We have been investing in wind and solar for 25 years, sir, and we still cannot heat a home with it.
We still cannot power an automobile with it, and we still can't get even a kite off the ground with it.
This, frankly, folks, is is insultingly stupid and absurd, and they're playing you for a bunch of suckers.
Frankly, Larry, big mistake we made was not investing in these clean energy, seven or eight, ten-five.
We did.
The dirty little secret.
We've been investing in these things for years, and they haven't done diddly squat.
In terms of replacing oil.
Which is what these pe this kick that they're on to replace oil.
Where does this come from, even politically?
Is there polling data out there that says a majority of the Americans hate oil?
That the weight of the White House is to demonize oil.
Where does it come from?
This is so this is irrational.
It borders on the insane to hate oil.
A lot of things can damage things just like oil can if it's you know not properly contained and used.
I just don't understand this.
Well, I do, but I mean I'm trying to express my incredulity here at the absolute stupidity of assuming a position.
This is like coming out against oxygen.
Or it's like arguing against rain.
It's just it's just silly.
What is the damage?
How is oil destroyed America?
How has it destroyed people's lives?
It's done just the opposite.
Where does this come from?
What in the world is the political calculation these people have to construct a presidential campaign based on the hatred of oil as though oil itself is a conservative Republican.
They're treating oil as no different than Bush.
They hate Bush, they hate oil.
And both are irrational.
And our buddies, our buddies at CNN.
They're preparing a retrospective special, ladies and gentlemen, on the disaster that was the oil spill at Prince William's Sound for the Exxon Valdez.
What they will not tell you is that if you go up there today, you won't find any evidence of it other than the stupid memorials that human beings.
This is where oil was on the rock.
This is where the otter got eaten by the shark when we threw it back in there, the sea lion or whatever ate the otter.
Nature cleaned up itself so damn fast.
It was such a laughable thing to watch people with dish towels and dawn dishwashing detergent, wiping oil off of the rocks at Prince William Sound.
Of course, the birds got oil on their wings, and it was not pleasant to look at, but it's an accident.
The skipper of the Exxon Valdez did not say, I want to destroy America.
I want to destroy Alaska and then let the stuff go.
But anyway, the sea eats oil.
The sea eats oil alive.
The sea eats oil alive.
That place up there, nature cleaned it up faster than we ever could.
But why in the world this abject hatred for a commodity?
I mean, I can understand if you're a little kid and you don't like peas or broccoli.
But an entire political party and an ideological movement has now targeted oil as as big a threat to this country as conservative Republicans are.
It's hard to get your arms around this.
As the Ohio players roller coaster.
Oh, yes, from the Groveyard of Forgotten Favorites.
Cedar Rapids, Iowa, Steve, you're next on the Rush Schlimbaugh program.
Hi.
Yeah, Rush.
It just drives me absolutely nuts to hear this 700 billion dollar thing thrown around as if that's something that's bad.
Because most of that comes right back to us anyway.
I mean, we got our good friends to the north, Canada, our rainy day friends to the south, Mexico, and when they get that money from us, they get the lion's share of it.
It comes right back into our country and purchased goods.
The other day.
But it's it's not just that.
It's not just that, Stephen.
I understand your frustration because my brother, I am feeling it myself.
It's not just that the dollars that we send overseas come back.
What do we do with the oil?
The oil leads to jobs, it leads to productivity, it leads to the advancement of lifestyles.
It leads to people having vacations, it leads to food making it to the market.
It leads to the grocery store having food when you go to the market.
This is also twilight zone-ish.
We're now in a we got to defend a commodity.
It's one thing to have to defend our ideology and to defend our president.
Now we gotta defend a commodity.
Can you imagine if the liberals were attacking cotton?
No different than This attack on oil.
Now I know what you're saying, but rush, but rush, but rush.
This is all about global warming and the carbon footprints.
That's a hoax.
It's a flat-out hoax.
It's not about that.
It's about leftists who have lost their love for this country, who think of their country as guilty of innumerable sins, and we have to pay the price.
We have to roll back our lifestyles.
All these Yehuls out there shouting, we are 25% of the world's population using, or 3% of the population of the world and using 25% of the world's resources significantly Static argument makes no sense.
Doesn't explain anything without a dynamic analysis of it.
Yeah, you know why?
Okay, we're 3% of the world's population.
We use 25% of the world's resources.
I don't even believe it, but let's accept it as true for the sake of it.
You know why we do?
Because we can.
The others can't.
And what we do is in the interest of the betterment of all mankind.
But if you don't see America as the good guys, if you see America's racist, sexist, bigots, slavish homophobes, or what have you, the way the left sees this country.
That's why, you know, this election is so damned important.
And it's it's we have on one side, we have the fundamentals of the founding principles of this country under assault as they have never been before by a bunch of people who don't think this country the way it's currently constituted is moral and just imperfect.
And so they want to try what has repeatedly failed every time it's been tried worldwide throughout human history.
And that is socialism, a large collectivist state, making sure everybody's happy, make sure everybody's got the same amount of everything, same amount of education, same amount of opportunity, same income, same house, same TV, same cars.
Anything less than that is imperfect and unjust.
Dealing with a bunch of literal maniacs.
Mike in Amarillo, Texas.
Welcome to the EIB network.
Hello.
Yes, Rush.
Glad to be able to talk to you.
Thank you.
Talking about T Boone Pickens, why is Obama talking about one of the richest oil men in the country who is trying to buy like 2,000 uh wind generators, but he's not going to put any on his property because he doesn't like the way they look on his property.
I will tell I don't know about that, but I will tell you why Obama is quoting T Boone Pickens.
And there is one reason he's quoting T-Boon Pickens, that's because T-Bone is a Republican.
And T Boone has said two things that Obama likes.
And he's ignoring everything else that T-Bone has said.
Obama loves it when T-Bone uses that 700 billion dollar transfer of wealth figure.
We're sending 700 billion over to enemies.
He loves when T Boone says that, but it's not as T Boone describes it.
It's not a transfer of wealth, it's an exchange of wealth.
We've been through that.
Second thing he likes is when T-Bone goes through this notion of we are 3% of the world's population using 25% of the world's resources.
Liberals have been using it since Paul Ehrlich back in the 70s.
What T-Bone wants, and what Obama doesn't mention.
In addition to natural gas, in addition to T-Bone's dream of his massive wind farm business, T-Bone wants to drill out the wazoo.
T Boone wants to drill for all anywhere we can find it.
But T-Bone is saying what Obama, we can't drill our way out of this, and T-Bone says we can't drill away out of this because if we drill our way out of it, wind farms are going to be less attractive.
All right, that's it.
The fastest three hours in media.
Total la completa.
They are finished, ladies and gentlemen.
You're on your own for the next 21 hours.
But I'll see you back here, same time, same tomorrow, same station with the same broadcast excellence.
I'll look forward to it as well.
▲
Export Selection