All Episodes
Previous Next
July 23, 2008 - Rush Limbaugh Program
35:29
July 23, 2008, Wednesday, Hour #3
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Well, I'll be damned.
Ha ha ha!
Whereas my mother used to say, goodness sakes alive.
While Barack Obama is speaking about international affairs in Germany, before thousands of fans tomorrow, John McCain will be talking about a pressing domestic issue while on an oil rig in the Gulf Coast.
Greetings, ladies and gentlemen.
It's Rush Limbaugh and the Excellence in Broadcasting Network.
We're here at 800-282-2882, the email address Lrushbo at EIBNet.com.com.
Hey, cookie, go back to the program archives on Monday and find, because I mean I can sit here and tell the audience I said anything.
If they go back to the archives and find where I suggested that Senator McCain, while he's doing all this over there, Obama's doing all this stuff over to Middle East.
Focus on gasoline, gasoline, gasoline, four bucks a gallon, drilling, drilling, drilling, needs to go out to an oil rig.
And I said, then he needs to go to a gasoline station.
Needs to go up to Anwar.
Finette bit, cookie.
Please.
And uh and put it there on the uh giving them a broadcast engineer.
So weather permitting, McCain will helicopter from Louisiana to an oil rig in the Gulf Coast to make the case for expanded offshore drilling, says a McCain aid.
McCain will be joined by a small press pool of reporters and photographers on a trek, sure to offer memorable images.
Goodness sakes alive.
All right, there's global warming news out there, ladies and gentlemen.
From the Fox website, the headline, former global warming alarmist deals blow to greenhouse gas theory.
A former global warming alarmist and creator of the model that measures Australia's compliance with the Kyoto Protocol says that while global warming is real, there is no evidence that the main cause is carbon emissions.
David Evans says that CO2 emissions play at most a minor role.
By the way, grab audio soundbite number one.
Evans writes, I think it's number one, is that the Roy Spencer bite?
Yeah, have that standing by.
Evans writes in the Australian newspaper that if global warming was caused by CO2, scientists would have found hot spots about six miles up in the Earth's atmosphere over the tropics.
Evans describes those hot spots as the signature of the greenhouse effect.
He says scientists have been trying to locate them for years using thermometers attached to weather balloons.
They can't find these hot spots.
Years of research show no hot spot whatsoever, adding that an increased greenhouse effect is not the cause of global warming.
And this is one of the early agitators, one of the one of the creators of a model that showed it.
And uh not only I even think the world is not warming.
The temperature's been going down for seven years.
In related global warming news.
This is also from Australia and Australian newspaper.
And this is just it's it's getting more and more absurd each time these people start making claims.
Get this.
Australian television advertising is producing as much as 57 tons of carbon dioxide per hour.
And 30-second commercial breaks are among the worst offenders, according to audit figures from pitch consultants Trinity P3.
Carbon emissions are partially strong, particularly strong during high rating programs, such as the final episodes of the 10 network's biggest loser, which produced 2,135 kilograms per 30-second ad.
So you think you can dance at 2,061 kilograms for every 30 seconds.
Closely followed by the 7 News, 6 p.m. news at 1,689 kilograms, and the program border security at 1802 kilograms.
Are you with me on this?
I know you how they calculating a commercial Causes.
Why doesn't the rest of the program?
Let's read on, shall we?
Because I, my friends, have not, I don't know what's coming next.
I just read the headline in the first paragraph.
I said, this is enough for me.
But let's keep going.
Trinity P3 managing director Darren Woolley said emissions are calculated by measuring a broadcaster's power consumption.
And that of a consumer watching an ad on television in their home.
We look at the number of households, the number of televisions, and then the proportion of TVs that are plasma, L C D or traditional, and we calculate energy consumption based on these factors.
Trinity P3 formalizing a standard carbon footprint measurement of advertising, which it claims will be the first of its kind.
Most companies have been obliged to think their think through their strategies on reducing carbon emissions, and they need to remember that their marketing strategies do have an environmental impact that needs to be included.
This is not something that's easily able to be measured.
This is absurd.
It's absurd and insane.
I don't know how you can blame the commercials for this and not the program, but even at that.
I'm a fool to accept the premise.
So I'm saying television broadcasts 57 tons of CO2 emissions in every 30-second commercial in Australia.
And finally, this, ladies and gentlemen, from the Kansas City SCAR website.
Global warming in kittens, while it may seem hard to see the connection between the two, a climate phenomenon that melts glaciers and acidifies oceans, and cuddly four-ounce balls of fur, experts say there could be one.
Scribs Howard Foundation, each spring, onset of warm weather and longer days, drives female cats into heat.
Resulting in a few months of booming kitten populations known as kitten season.
The brain receives instructions to produce a hormone basically initiates the uh the heat cycle in a cat, and those instructions are affected by the length of day and usually the rising temperatures of spring.
Oh.
It always gets warmer in the days, get always get longer in the spring.
What the hell is this?
Now we're going to have more cats.
Oh, and there's one other here.
Ladies and gentlemen, the story here from Wired Science.com.
Given all the news coverage about the rise of the Chinese economy, you could be forgiven for thinking that the world's most populous country is hogging all the world's resources while the developed nations are fighting for scraps, but at least with transportation fuel, you'd be wrong.
California alone uses more gasoline than any country in the world except the U.S. as a whole.
Yes, my friends, you heard that correctly.
California alone uses more gasoline than any country in the world.
That means that California's 20 billion gallon gasoline and diesel habit is greater than China's.
Or Russia's.
Or India's or Brazil's or Germany.
And all this is according to the California Energy Commission's state alternative fuels plan.
Now, some might say that we should do a Barry Goldwater in reverse.
Rather than chopping off the East Coast, just chop off California, let them float out there with their own nation, and let them get their own oil, support their own habit.
That's not the way to look at this.
California alone uses more gasoline than any country in the world.
Yet, what is California?
California is the United States model for green living.
All of these innovations, Laurie David and unplugging your cell phone charger, and getting rid of your incandescent light bulb and putting in your compact fluorescence, and driving your Prius and your hybrids around, all that stuff.
Emanated in California.
The different formulations of gasoline to protect the environment.
All of this stuff.
You got Schwarzenegger out there who sadly is becoming a laughing stock over this.
You get green energy, you got green corporations, you've got a green list.
They are the model for green living, and they use more gasoline than any country in the world, other than the U.S. as a whole.
It'll be interesting to see how the official clown of the EIB network, Barbara Boxer, reacts to this news.
By the way, yesterday, the official climatologist of the EIB network, Dr. Roy Spencer, a man of great esteem, uh, a flawless character, uh impeccable scientific credentials, former climatologist and climatologist at NASA, now working out of the University of Alabama at Huntsville, appeared before Boxer's committee to testify about global warming.
This exchange took place.
In conclusion, I am predicting today that the theory that mankind is mostly responsible for global warming will slowly fade away in the coming years, as will the warming itself.
And I trust you would agree, madam chair, that such a result deserves to be greeted with relief.
That concludes my testimony, and I'd be willing to answer any questions.
Okay.
I also want to point out that on your own blog you said you never were told you couldn't speak about your scientific views.
And lastly, I guess is a certain congratulations.
Rush Limbaugh referred to you as the official climatologist of the Rush Limbaugh Excellence in Broadcasting Network.
Yeah, that's a tongue-in-cheek reference.
Right.
But I just wanted to point that out for people to understand.
I just want to make sure everybody knows what's really happening.
Yes.
What's really happening?
What is that, Senator Boxer?
What is really h I did I coach Dr. Spencer?
Our official climatologist?
I mean, isn't it you Democrat to do this?
Isn't it you Democrat to bring witnesses up and coach them?
And you have, especially in in uh judicial nomination hearings and so forth.
So once again, this is a bit of projection, Senator Bomber uh Senator Boxer accusing our climatologist of being fraudulent because he'd been coached by me only because that's how they do it.
I sent Dr. Spencer a note last night uh telling him I was very proud of his comportment, deportment, the way he handled himself up there, job well done.
I have just promoted him to vice president of the EIB network slash climatology.
You know, if Dr. Roy Spencer were a communist and had gone up there and testified yesterday, Barbara Boxer would have defended him against anybody who pointed out that he was a communist.
But he wasn't called a communist, he was called a collaborator with me.
And yet nobody stood up to defend.
Not that he needs it.
Dr. Spencer.
Uh, ladies and gentlemen, the uh see I told you so is ready to go.
This is Monday, and Dawn, you weren't here, so you didn't know this.
Well, this was Monday from this program.
Forget what hour this was.
I'm pretty sure it was in the first hour.
This is ridiculous.
This is a sham, and we're being distracted by it.
This whole thing is nothing more than an orchestrated circus when what's still on everybody's mind is gasoline, gasoline, gasoline, and four dollars.
And this is why were I McCain, you know where I would be this week?
I would be out on an oil rig.
And I would take the drive-bys with me, and I would point out how environmentally safe they are.
And I would show how damned impressive they are, as well as the workers.
And then if I were McCain, I'd fly up to Anwar, and I'd take a crew with me.
And I would propose drilling with the caveat that once it's done, it'll be restored to the desolate nothing that it is now.
There are jobs to be had up there.
And if I were McCain, next I would go to a nuclear power plant.
And I would brag on that technology and the non-CO2 output.
Have a bill in hand to cut red tape.
These are jobs we're talking about being created, building new nuclear power plants.
From there, go to the Newest clean burning coal plant that he can find in the country.
Brag about that.
Have a bill in hand to cut red tape to build these plants new.
These are jobs.
Energy is what's on the American people's mind.
Four dollar gasoline is on people's minds.
And this Obama thing is a pure unadulterated side show.
And so there you have it, ladies and gentlemen.
That's uh from of course you recognize the voice as mine from this past Monday, where I said I would be out on an oil rig if I were McCain.
And so McCain is going to an oil rig tomorrow.
He is going to take a helicopter from Louisiana to an oil rig in the Gulf Coast to make the case for expanded offshore drilling.
Going to do it.
Now note, too, uh ladies and gentlemen, that Senator McCain is taking a helicopter to the oil rig, which means it's way, way out there.
He's not going to swim there.
He's not going to get a little dinghy.
He's not going to take a boat out there.
He's going to get on a helicopter and fly to this oil well.
Meaning it's way, way offshore.
Nobody can see it.
That's why he's got to go there with a film crew, and he's got to talk about how important these things are.
And look how we got them here.
There's no reason we can't have more.
I'm glad that they decided to do this.
Tony in Falls Church, Virginia.
I'm glad you waited, sir.
You're next on the EIB network.
Hello.
Hello.
Um Rush, uh, with your permission, I've been uh sitting here trying to think of how I can build best help you and support you uh in my question uh and also with some of the information I've developed.
I I wanted to bring up to you the uh it's a little different than the topic you've been on for two hours, but it's certainly as relevant to to everything you do, if that's all right.
Yeah, fire away at it.
Okay.
Uh the American Dream Initiative is on Fannie Mae's website, and I've been waiting for months for either you or uh or Levine or somebody to mention it, but I feel compelled to mention it now and to direct you to it.
It uh it outlines a program that was initially a trillion dollars in 1995, uh passed by Clinton.
It was expanded by two trillion more.
Its purpose was purely political.
Its purpose was stated to increase home ownership.
All the fundamental uh pillars that uh were mainstays for home loans traditionally in America were let go by the wayside by the G by Fanny and Freddie, by our government uh by our government agencies were now bailing out.
Primarily the ability of the uh person making a loan to be able to pay it back.
Yes, sir.
Matter of fact, on the website itself, it mentions that a paid utility bill is adequate to get a loan on Fannie Mae's website itself.
Uh and seventeen million people were housed by uh the same crew that you speak of, uh uh Schumer, uh Frank, and the rest of them, uh, at the expense of the American public.
And it goes back to something I heard just uh well, I heard originally in 1970.
I I hate to quote Elders Cleaver, but he did say you either can be part of the problem and part of the solution.
And then I reheard it just now in waiting for you uh in your commercial break.
And and people must understand that they must start to understand if we don't know where we are, we certainly can't spend our time talking about uh talking about where we're headed.
Okay, I've got 45 seconds.
If you can if you can get to the point.
Yes, sir.
Uh I'd like to uh ask you a question of how going forward over the next few months you intend to rebut and uh deflect to the proper source the increases in interest rates, which are gonna be the next boot that will fall on all Americans.
And uh it's it's I'm throwing it out uh not expecting a full answer uh, but uh I do feel it's gonna start to unfold.
Okay, here's what I'll I'll make I'll make your prediction real quick.
If Obama is elected, maybe even McCain, I hope now if Obama's elected, look for anywhere from five hundred to seven hundred and fifty billion dollars, maybe up to one trillion dollars of new government spending and higher interest rates.
Cookie is working on the audio on lists.
But I wanted to alert you to uh uh the latest blow up between myself and the uh esteemed Democrat Senator from Colorado one Ken Salazar.
I have here in my formerly nicotine stained fingers, ladies and gentlemen, a copy of a story at the Denver Post by Anne Mulkern.
Conservative radio host Rush Limbaugh attacked Senator Ken Salazar of Colorado today on the oil shale issue.
While the Democrat Salazar said the debate is not about lowering gas prices, but about helping oil companies.
The day after the Bureau of Land Management unveiled preliminary rules for selling oil shale leases in Colorado and Wyoming and Utah, Limbaugh quoted President Bush.
This is from our morning update today.
Here, let me let me read the morning update to you.
I'll do it live.
I will embellish it.
I don't need to go to the replay.
In the 2004 election cycle, Ken Salazar ran as a new kind of Democrat, a guy not beholden to liberal ideology who would do what's right for the country.
That rhetoric proved effective in Colorado, and Salazar won his Senate seat.
This week, the Interior Department will unveil new regulations to allow the sale of oil shale leases on federal land.
In the Western states, those leases could eventually unlock up to 800 billion barrels of oil.
Last month, President Bush spelled out what that would mean for America, saying that one major deposit in the Rocky Mountain West alone would equal current annual oil imports for more than 100 years.
Guess who's blocking the way?
Yep.
Senator Ken Salazar, Democrat Colorado.
Last year, Senator Salazar slipped language into a bill to bar the federal government from issuing final regulations for commercial oil shale development.
Even with $4 a gallon gasoline.
Ken Salazar, Democrat Colorado, and his fellow Democrats are still preventing America from using our own resources to lower gas prices and to create new jobs.
In fact, Democrats, having killed off any chance of a gas tax holiday, reportedly now want to raise the federal tax you pay on each gallon of gas by ten cents up to twenty-eight plus cents per gallon.
Now the moral, uh, ladies and gentlemen, in case you haven't figured it out, is that new Democrats don't exist.
Running on change, running on new Democrat, running on being a moderate.
Only happens while running for office.
In office, Salazar and his ilk revert to the same old liberals that they have always been.
Which means they don't give a rat's rear end about you or your gasoline price.
That comes second, third, or fourth to their own reelection.
And of course, party loyalty.
Well, that ran on our blowtorch affiliate in Denver, 850 A.M. KOA.
And Salazar's office, or Salazar himself happened to hear about it.
And uh they called him or he called them, and he was on their morning show today, uh, reacting to this.
That's the tape that Cookie is uh is working on as we speak.
She should be able to get that done uh before the end of the program.
But just continuing here with the Denver uh post story, they quote me from the update as saying, excuse me, the moral, in case you haven't figured this out, is that new Democrats don't exist except when they're running for office.
Salazar interviewed later on 850 KOA, said that Limbaugh is spreading falsehoods along with many of the people who want us essentially to give away the public lands of Colorado.
He also says that this is a giant trick to enrich the oil companies.
You know, which You know, Senator Salazar and the rest of you Democrats, you're gonna have to make up your minds who the villain is and stick with it.
It's either big oil is the villain or not speculators.
Now you guys have moved on to speculators being the villain the past couple weeks, and all of a sudden you're back to big oil.
This is why, ladies and I have been I have been pounding the issue here.
It's gasoline prices, it's gasoline drill, drill, drill, drill here, drill.
Now the Democrat Party is the one standing in the way of affordable gasoline.
The Democrat Party is standing in the way of increased domestic supply.
The Democrat Party is the one that's sitting worrying all about our foreign dependence.
And uh promoting all these things like alternative this, alternative, we're no there's no such thing to power your automobile or to power our airline aircraft.
It just isn't there.
They're the ones standing in the way of it.
So Senator Salazar goes on KOA Denver today to say that I am lying and spreading falsehoods.
Now, well, now I haven't read the whole story.
I haven't heard the tape.
I don't know if he denied anything.
Snurley, it's not let's not jump to the gun, sturtly.
This is why I'm hosting you're the official Obama criticizer working off a script.
I don't know that he did.
I don't know if he denied anything.
The odds are he didn't deny it.
He just is he's changing the subject.
Says, I'm lying, I'm spreading falsehoods.
Give away the public lands at Colorado.
I'm not trying to give away the public lands at Colorado.
Colorado controls 80% of the oil shale reserves in the entire country, Salazar said.
The technology to develop that shale does not yet exist, he said, and there are unanswered questions about how much water it'll take, where it'll come from, and how many coal fire plants will be needed to build uh be built to process the uh the uh the sale.
Uh moreover, Salazar said the BLM has said it will be twenty fifteen at the earliest before oil can be extracted from the shale.
This is not about the development of oil shale today that'll help us with gas prices.
What this is about is trying to give millions of acres of land away to the oil companies say they can lock it up forever as part of their reserves.
I'm not gonna let the federal government run over Colorado.
That's what Salazar says.
Once again, uh come up with a demon, big oil, about whom they've never proven anything in terms of gouging or price fixing or anything of the sort.
But as I say, you guys are the Democrats again to get to figure out who your demon is and uh and stick to it.
Now, I want to go back to a call.
The caller we had right before the uh break at the bottom of the hour was talking about Freddie Mac Fannie Mae.
Dr. Sowell, Dr. Thomas Sowell has a brilliant piece today at National Review Online, our government problem solvers.
At election time, politicians can't help but do something, even if it makes matters worse.
We don't look to arsonists to help put out fires, but we do look to politicians to help solve financial crises that they played a major role in creating.
How did the government help create the current financial mess?
Well, let Thomas Sowell count the ways.
In addition to federal laws that and by the way, this relates to Salazar.
This really these people have all the answers.
In addition to federal laws that pressure lenders to lend to people that they would not otherwise lend to, and in places where they would otherwise not invest, state and local governments have in various parts of the country so severely restricted building as to lead to skyrocketing housing prices, which in turn have led many people to resort to creative financing in order to buy these artificially more expensive homes.
Now, doesn't this ring true?
Salazar doesn't want any of uh the property in uh in in Colorado turned over.
No.
Keep it off limits for the production of oil and so forth.
Meanwhile, the Federal Reserve system brought interest rates down to such low levels that creative financing with interest-only mortgage loans enable people to buy houses they could not otherwise afford.
But as we all know, there's no free lunch.
Interest only loans do not continue indefinitely.
After a few years, such mortgage loans typically require the borrower to begin paying back some of the principal, which means the monthly mortgage payments are gonna begin to rise.
Since everybody knew that the Fed's system, extremely low interest rates were not gonna last forever, much creative financing also involved adjustable rate mortgages where the interest charged by the lender would rise when interest rates in the economy as a whole rose.
In the housing market, a difference of a couple percentage points in the interest rate can make a big difference in the monthly mortgage payment.
For somebody who buys a house costing half a million dollars, which can be a very small house in many parts of coastal California, the difference between paying 4% and 6% interest would amount to more than $7,000 a year.
Now, for people who have had to stretch to the limit to buy the house in the first place, an increase of $7,000 a year in their mortgage payment can be enough to push them over the edge financially.
In other words, government laws and policies at federal, state, and local levels have had the net effect, have had the net effect of putting both borrowers and lenders way out on a limb.
Yet when that limb began to crack, the first reaction in politics and in the media has been to look to government to solve the problem because as always it was called the market's fault, the lender's fault, and everybody else's fault except those politicians who created this situation in the first place.
And I would suggest to you that our lack of domestic oil can be blamed to the same ineffective politicians standing in the way of progress there, now sitting around looking for villains to blame, such as the speculators or as Senator Salazar blames the oil companies again.
When if the this it's a common refrain, these people create these new laws that get everything all screwed up, and when they go bad, they sit around as spectators and conduct hearings to find out who in the market cheated or broke laws.
Markets often get blamed for conveying a reality that was not created by the market.
It was created by bureaucrats, senators, and members of Congress.
For example, the fact that the poor pay more for what they buy in stores in low income neighborhoods is often blamed on those who run the stores rather than on those who create extra costs through crime, vandalism, and riots.
If the store owners are making big profits, the big chain stores would be rushing in to share in the bonanza instead of avoiding low-income neighborhoods like the plague.
Markets were also blamed for the Great Depression of the 30s, and New Deal politicians were credited with getting us out of it.
But increasing numbers of economists and historians have concluded that it was the government intervention which prolonged the Great Depression beyond that of other depressions where the government did nothing and is a case in point.
Stock market crash in 1987 was at least as big as the stock market crash in 1929.
But instead of being followed by a Great Depression, the 87 crash was followed by 20 years of economic growth, low inflation, low unemployment.
The Reagan administration, after the 87 crash, did nothing.
Despite outrage in the media at the government's failure to live up to its responsibility as seen in liberal quarters.
But nothing was apparently what needed to be done, so the markets could adjust.
Nobody did anything.
The last thing politicians can do in an election year is nothing.
So we can all look for all sorts of solutions by politicians of both parties.
And like most political solutions, these are likely to make matters worse.
Thank you, Thomas Sowell, and thank you, Senator Salazar.
We have a supply problem in oil.
We've reached a tipping point at four dollar a gallon gasoline, and you want to stop any progress in adding to our supply so you can continue to demonize the oil companies rather than participate in something that would be genuine progress for the people who elected you and the rest of the people in this country you represent.
All right, we've got the uh we've got we've got we got we got the audio from Ken Salazar, and I read this Denver Post story, and they leave out the most important part of the story in the Denver.
They leave out the fact, ladies and gentlemen, that it was Senator Salazar who slipped language into the bill That bars the federal government from issuing final regulations for commercial oil shale development.
He's the guy that did it.
And they leave that out of the story.
All right.
He's on this morning with the anchors, April Zesbaugh and Stefan Tubbs.
They ask Salazar what a thought about my commentary.
Well, I think Rush Limbaugh is uh mistaken.
I think he's spreading falsehoods along with uh many of the people who uh want us to essentially give away uh the public lands of Colorado, you know, the lands on the western slope.
We control 80% of the oil shale reserves in the entire country.
They're all located on the western slope of Colorado.
I said that.
We know the history of the boom bust of oil shale.
We also know that the oil companies and the Department of Interior are telling us that we don't have the technology right now to be able to develop uh oil out of the shale.
And if we are able ever to do it, it's gonna be about twenty fifteen.
So this is not about the development of oil shale today that'll help us with gas prices.
What this is about is trying to give millions of acres of land away to the oil company so that they can lock it up forever as part of their reserves.
And I don't think that's right.
I'm not gonna let the federal government run over Colorado.
So the next question was Well, Rush Limbaugh talking about you in the Denver Post this morning, and basically reads that you're a key player in this.
Uh you're basically a buck stops with you because of the way in which language was inserted in the spending bill.
Right now, the uh way in at least that you're near future, you feel like you're gonna be swayed on this whatsoever.
Steph and I know the facts of this uh too well.
I've been on the ground uh in Rio Blanco County.
I've uh visited with the oil shale companies.
I have the letter from the president of Chevron that says that uh there's no way that they're ready for commercial oil shale regulations.
I have the testimony on the record by the Assistant Secretary of Interior saying that they couldn't in any way be able to produce uh oil from shale until perhaps twenty fifteen.
So what is then the headlong rush to get it done now?
The answer to that is that it's a big giveaway to put all of these resources into the hands of a few oil companies, and that's not how we ought to be dealing with our public resources.
You know, I'm not against development of uh oil shale.
Sure.
I think that it ought to be looked at along with nuclear and a whole host of other things.
Yeah, like we're doing.
You're looking at nuclear.
Now wait a second.
We're not gonna produce a drop of this stuff until 2015, right?
That's how many years?
Seven.
But everybody's saying ten.
He admits seven.
What's wrong with seven?
Oh, well, we've been through this whole argument.
Anyway, Democrat Party standing in the way.
Democrat Party in a mess of hot water.
They don't know it yet.
They're in a mess of hot water because, ladies and gentlemen, we have scouted, we have found Renai Tankless Water Heaters.
They produce the hot water that the Democrat Party is in, and they'll know it soon enough.
You got an old tank heater in your in your in your house.
You know you're wasting all kinds of money, energy costs being what they are.
You're wasting tons of money.
You're heating up water that never is used.
On occasion, you do use it up and don't have one when you want it.
Never will happen with a Renae tankless water heater.
People have been asking me when the next tankless Renee tankless water heater commercial coming up.
This is it.
Go to their website, ladies and gentlemen, and you can find out just how much money you can save.
They've a little calculator there if you put a Renault tankless water heater in your house.
It's small.
You'll have room to do other things with when you take the tank out.
And uh, you know, if if you're if your tank is seven years old or older, it's gonna it's gonna wear out at some point soon.
It's time to start thinking about replacing it and saving money at the same time.
Go to Forever Hotwater.com to see how this works.
Foreverhotwater.com, the Renai Tankless Water Heater.
Can Salazar with an apparently tankless job today, trying to refute progress.
Well, another exciting edition of our program is in the can, ladies and gentlemen, but we're ready.
Raring, revved up for tomorrow.
Thanks for joining us today.
We'll look forward to tomorrow and see you then.
▲
Export Selection