All Episodes
Previous Next
July 23, 2008 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:26
July 23, 2008, Wednesday, Hour #1
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome to today's edition of the Rush 24-7 Podcast.
their work.
We I called and I'm with that and our playing from the end of yesterday's program, ladies and gentlemen.
Okay, Ed, take it down.
That's the seven and a half minute Obama montage that we put together after his 40-minute press conference yesterday in Amon Jordan with not one repeat.
Greetings, my friends.
Great to have you here.
It's the Excellence in Broadcasting Network, El Rush Bowl behind the golden EIB microphone, 800 282-2882, email address L Rushbow at EIBNet.com.
What is this hurricane stuff in the news?
Today, there's only one real story out there.
Obama said that Iranian nukes would be a game changer in the Middle East and in the world.
I never knew that until now.
I never knew that it was going to be dangerous for the Iranians to get nukes, but Obama has said so, and they are still covering this hurricane down there.
The drive-by's, ladies and gentlemen, are off track.
I just got a note from somebody right as the program began that Obama somewhere said that he is on the Senate banking committee.
He isn't on the Senate banking committee.
We are we are way beyond Clinton-esque with uh with all of this.
Anyway, folks, it's great to have you here.
Three hours of broadcast excellence straight ahead here on the Excellence in Broadcasting Network.
Uh I was watching television this morning uh in the midst of feverish and devoted show prep.
I was watching Fox, and they had a PR guy come on.
It was just before 11 o'clock.
And I I forget I forget this PR guy's name.
But he was there as an expert.
What's going on here with the media coverage of Obama?
And he said something that I think is pretty interesting.
He did not deny that they are fellow travelers, the drive-bys in Obama, he did not deny that they're in a tank ideologically, uh politically and all that, but he said there's something else going on here, too.
He said these people are just excited as hell that history is being made here, that Obama is candidacy, which and we've had this referred to as such before, is historic, and that they, the drive-bys, want to make history, and they want to be able to say they were there, and they want to be able to say that they helped.
And all of this, I think it's a great point.
All of that devolves from this whole white guilt situation from the uh the civil rights days of this country.
I think I think uh that that's a it's a good point.
Uh it it doesn't, it doesn't take anything else off the table.
And this guy, I wish I could remember his name.
I should have written it down, but uh, but I didn't.
And so, in addition to the ideological kinship they have, in addition to the saying political party, they're all Democrats or all liberals, they want history to be part.
They want to make history.
They not just Obama to make history, they want to be able to say they did it.
And such as such, this is why they're they're running around.
Yesterday I had what I thought was a pretty good illustration of this.
And it is this that the you know, the the Soviet leaders from Lenin and Stalin all the way up to Brezhnev and Gorbachev and Dropov.
They never got this kind of fawning press from Pravda, and they owned it.
I mean, they wrote their own press, and they didn't get this kind of good.
The Beatles never got this.
Princess Dye never got this.
And Victor Davis Hansen has taken up this theme today at National Review Online in a little uh post on the corner, and he says they're just acting like a bunch of adolescents.
These are they the the drive-bys have arrested development.
They are just a bunch of teenagers here.
The only thing they haven't done is throw their underwear and bras at the guy when he's up there on stage.
Yet uh Alessandra Staley today.
Now, by the way, there is another Judas.
Uh, and the Judas today is the editorial writer at the Washington Post.
We had a Judas among the Obama drive-by disciples yesterday, Dan Balls, we've got another one.
They wrote an editorial today, lead editorial, that just rips Obama for getting it wrong about timelines in Iraq, wrong about the Afghanistan bringing the central front in the war on terror.
It's a pretty devastating piece.
Now, I think something that's going on here.
The drive bys, especially the parents of the drive-bys, the editorial writers and so forth, people on the op-ed page, they they they realize this.
This is untenable.
They cannot continue to run.
Did you see the third quarter profits or second quarter profits New York Times down 82%?
82%.
Ladies and gentlemen, when you stop doing your job, people stop paying attention to you.
I think I think uh, you know, a bunch of us uh our pseudo pseudo-conservatives are still paying attention to the New York Times.
His second quarter profit drops eighty-two percent.
And you can't blame that on me, because my profile in the New York Times Sunday magazine was in July, which starts the third quarter.
You can't lump me in with a New York Times failure.
Uh yeah, should do another ad for him.
That lasted until the now gang got hold of it and they had to cancel the ad.
But anyway.
Alessandra Staley, I got it.
I got a note today from a friend who said, you know, this this is uh Howard Kurtz has a piece today talking about McCain's gaffes.
And again, wondering, is these gaffes related to age?
And a lot of people are very concerned here.
And my friends and you know, this is has Howard Kurtz not listened to the sheer incoherence of Barack Obama.
I mean, it's one thing for McCain to have some of these uh gaffs like uh saying Iraq when he met Afghanistan and Iran when he met Iraq or whatever.
We all do that, but but Obama is incoherent.
We've been playing these sound bites yesterday, they're incoherent.
Not only that, they're not he's nothing but a con man.
These things, these statements, he's all over the board with things.
He can't remember who he lied to yesterday, and so he keeps telling more and more lies, flip-flops, what have you.
And I wrote back, I said, You're missing the point.
It's not what Obama says.
It's not about what Obama says.
It's how he looks.
It's his presence.
It's the fact that he is alive, and that he is walking among his disciples.
They don't care what he's saying.
It doesn't matter what he's saying.
He's historic.
His is a racial candidacy as far as the drive by's are concerned.
That's what the historic aspect is.
They want history to be made.
And the history is black man being elected president.
And they want to say they did it.
They just want to be bystanders and see if he can pull it off on his own.
So after that little exchange with my buddy, came across this Alessandra Staley story in the New York Times.
She's a TV critic.
You um this might make some of you people hurl out there.
It's not pro-Obama bias in the news media that's driving the effusion of coverage.
It's the news.
Mr. Obama's week-long tour of war zones and foreign capitals is noteworthy because it's so unusual to see a presidential candidate act so presidential overseas.
Mr. Obama looks supremely confident and at home, talking to generals and heads of state.
When posing for an official photograph with a foreign leader, Mr. Obama often places his hand paternally on the other man's arm, subliminally signaling that though a visitor, he, Obama, is the real host of the meeting.
Touring ruins of the Citadel in Amon Jordan, Mr. Obama strode confidently with his jacket crooked over his shoulder in classic Kennedy style.
McCain aides haven't been nearly as creative on his behalf.
Their stagecraft has been notably unflattering to the candidate.
Well, Mr. Obama was shown striding across military tarmacs, inspecting troops standing at attention.
McCain on Monday was uh seen driving around in a golf cart.
My former president George Bush in the resort town of Kennebuckport, Maine.
So, my friends, it isn't what he's saying.
We are the ones pointing out what he's saying.
That's I now it's not I know it's an orgasm, snurkly.
You don't have to tell me.
I'm just that it's not a news story.
It is an orgasm.
It is a replay when Clinton was out there on Catalina Island off to the coast of San Diego.
And power crackling from his jeans.
Except that a guy wrote that one.
Alessandra Staley, a female.
It's an orgasm.
But the point is, they're not reporting what he says.
They don't care.
What he says doesn't matter what he says.
It doesn't matter what he stands for.
He's history.
He represents something that will make the drive-by's respect their country and respect themselves.
So we're the ones.
Ladies and gentlemen, we're the ones who are reporting to you what Obama says.
We are playing his own words to you.
And we are giving you deft analysis.
It does matter what he's saying.
Those of us who care about policy and character of people, it certainly does matter, and we are doing again the job the drive-by's should be doing.
And maybe at one time used to do.
Anyway, brief time out here.
We have uh another edition of the official Obama criticizer coming up, as well as many, many sound bites, and we will play uh continually today the Obama montage of the stuttering from his 40-minute press conference yesterday in Amon Jordan.
Be right back after this.
Hey, folks, I just uh got an AP story here hot off the uh wire.
Uh basically it the story can pack your bags for Baghdad.
Uh Iraq is now looking to tourism.
Someone had fun tinkering with the airline board at the old disused terminal at Baghdad International airport.
It advertises a special flight on Japan Airlines, embossed rid of Sydney, Australia, where the flight from Baghdad to Mexico City is delayed.
Uh the opening of a new airport.
Wonder who built that, by the way.
In the southern city of Najaf is expected to help boost the number of religious pilgrims, mostly Iranians, visiting Shiite shrines to one million this year.
At any rate, hundreds of hotels in the holy cities of Najaf and Karbala are usually packed.
Tourism is happening.
I don't care where it's come from.
Tourism is happening in Iraq.
Do you think if we had done the Obama Iraq plan, this story could have been written?
No, ladies and gentlemen.
Would not have happened.
And now, as promised, we turn to the official Obama criticizer on the EIB network, Bo Snurdly.
Thank you.
This is Bo Snurley, official Barack criticizer for the EIB network.
Certified black enough to criticize with organic slave blood.
I have a message.
Mr. Obama, your overseas visit to uh the um Iraq and the war zones uh is uh uh I proving to be a world-class uh embarrassment.
Uh aside from giving support to the efforts of uh Mook ta Mu Tadaal uh Sadar who hates America, you've really said um uh nothing there that uh you uh didn't say here.
Which uh um it calls into question the let me think about the uh I should say the whole purpose of the trip.
You continue to denigrate the efforts of our military and won't acknowledge their success and to make matters worth uh your uh uh stuttering uh performance uh is um now being uh uh held up to ridicule, uh, despite all the uh glowing reports from your uh public aid uh public relations uh uh specialist agents uh in the media.
Your performance, sir, has not made you look presidential.
It has uh really I want to say um harmed your presidential chances in the eyes of those who take foreign policy seriously.
Uh this has uh truly been a sad performance, sir.
And now an extended translation for our EIB brothers and sisters in the hood.
I dog.
I I'm gonna come whiff it on you today.
First up, B, what's up with this Iraqi dealer, yo?
We got it chill over there.
We got issues here, my brother.
And what are you doing?
Like gas prices, man.
You know what I'm saying?
You posing, man.
You even got Rush talking about how you pimping Bush's ride over there, man.
And then you go over there, and what's the first thing you do?
You diss our troops, man.
You giving props to Mookie G, man.
Sadar, yo.
His boys was the one flaming the IEDs on our boys, and you claim they're the ones who cooled things out.
It was our guys that did that, yo.
What you should have done if you had to go over there anyway, was just have a sit down with old Mookie Man, pull out that New Yorker magazine cover, you know the one with you in the turban and with Shelley with that AK wrapped on a man.
Tell him, yo, you see this, bro?
This is me and my shorty.
We're gonna come over here and whip some ass after I get in, yo.
If you don't keep things chill.
That's what diplomacy is, yo.
But then no, what do you do, man?
You give this guy props.
And then, yo, yo, yo, yo, what's up with all this stuttering, man?
You run it for president, man, or you trying to get Porgy Pig's job with one uh that's all folks.
Come on, man.
Did Jesse snatch them baby makers from you, bro?
What's with that, man?
You went to Harvey, yo.
That's all you got?
Uh-uh- uh-uh-oh.
Yo, even Reverend Wright don't come out like that, man.
He makes it flow, man.
You have him say, God, uh-oh, oh, damn America.
He make it flow, man.
What's with you?
Then, on top of all this, yo, you go over there and you say the biggest problem is Iraq.
Is it so many men or unemployed?
No, no, no, man.
The biggest problem over there is they ain't giving us our props, yo.
We are the ones that killed off old Hussein from them, I'm sorry, Saddami from them, man.
We freed them, yo.
They're looking for work.
Man, you ought to go over there and tell them brothers, man, y'all need to get busy and start building a pipeline to break us off some of that oil.
You know what I'm saying?
But no, man, you go over there and start talking about the unemployed man.
When's the last time you was in Kiladelphia, yo?
Brothers is trying to get paid over here, man.
Can't find no jobs.
They unemployed.
When's the last time you was down at Katrina, man?
Come on, bro.
What's up with that?
Yo, you know, I'm about to check you off, Obama, man.
You need to start listening, man.
Every time you step out, man, you chumping yourself and chumping off our country and our military, yo.
This is not cool.
That concludes our statement.
And that was official Obama criticizer Bolsonerd.
We now go to the audio sound bites uh from today.
Uh, the Messiah, the most merciful Lord Barack Obama, this morning in Israel with the foreign minister Z. Or Levney, I should say.
He this is before he took questions from the press.
The Messiah made this announcement.
My understanding is uh this gentleman right here is going to actually call on people so that I don't get in trouble with any of you.
I want I want all of you to like me.
So I'm gonna he's gonna be the bad guy.
He's gonna make the decision.
The Masama of the uh the Messiah exhibiting some uh uh unknown insecurity here, previously unknown, wants all the reporters to like him.
Now, if he wants all the reporters to like him, he must think that some of them don't.
And how in the world could he get that impression?
How in the world could Obama think they don't not just like him, but love him?
How could he get the impress they worship Obama?
They are disciples.
He wants them to like him.
I'm gonna tell you.
I know this may have been halfway lighthearted with with Obama.
I think he desperately means this.
And I know that you and your personal life, you have known people whose objective it is to be liked.
And what are they?
Phonies, are they not?
They try to be whatever it is they think somebody else wants them to be, so that they will be liked.
And nobody can pull that off.
But they're all phonies, the people who try to do that.
This is what Obama said about Ooh, we're not gonna be able to squeeze.
I just noticed this is a 56 second bite.
And so is the next one, 54 seconds.
So we'll save these.
Uh The next two here are about uh how he will use his powers of persuasion to convince the Iranians not to make nuclear weapons, and then a tortured answer to a question on negotiating with Hamas.
All that and much more coming up, plus this New York, I'm sorry, Washington Post editorial today.
And it is, let me summarize it for you before reading to you some of the excerpts.
They're getting bogged down in facts here.
U.S. commanders in Iraq and the Iraq government do not support Obama's strategy, and Afghanistan is not the central front in the war on terror.
This is the point the Post is making in this editorial.
They are today's Judas betraying the Messiah in the drive-by media.
There's a reason why this is happening too.
I will explain it all when we come back.
Having more fun than a human being should be allowed to have.
I am Rush Limbo, America's real anchor man.
All right, now back to the audio sound bites.
Two of them for now from the uh press conference this morning in Israel.
This is Obama, the Messiah, the most merciful one, explaining how he will use his powers of persuasion to convince the Iranians not to make nuclear weapons.
What I said in response was that I would, at my time and choosing, be willing to meet with any leader if I thought it would uh promote the national security interests of the United States of America.
My whole goal in terms of uh having tough, serious, direct diplomacy is not because I'm naive about the nature of any of these regimes.
I'm not.
It is because if we show ourselves willing to talk and to offer carrots and sticks in order to uh deal with uh these pressing problems.
And if Iran then rejects any overtures of that sort, it puts us in a stronger position to mobilize the international community to ratchet up the pressure on.
Do you, ladies and gentlemen, do you realize um history is just starting today?
Nothing has happened before Obama went to the Middle East.
Nothing has happened.
We haven't tried anything with Iran, and we are not going to try until Obama gets in the Oval Office.
This is rambling incoherence.
Just what in a hell does he think we have been doing for years with the Iranians?
We're gonna offer them carrots and sticks in order to deal with these pressing problems.
If they reject any overtures of that sort, it puts us in a stronger position to mobilize the international community has been mobilized.
The international community and the EAIA, what are the atomic energy agency, they're all been involved in this for years.
Sir.
And hadn't gotten us anywhere.
They are laughing at us.
They are laughing at you today.
Mahmoud Abrainizad is laughing himself silly, as are the Mullahs listening to you, because they know what you just said.
So when they finish listening to your soundbite, the mullahs and Ahmadinejad are gonna sit together, good, good, it's going to continue Kudan's policy, which means doing nothing.
I mean, this does add up to the fact that all that needs to happen is for Obama to meet with these people and the power of his personality and his presence.
Well, see, they causes them to see the light in a different shade.
Uh history is just now beginning, snurly.
There's nothing ever nothing happened yesterday.
Nothing happened 20 or 30 years ago.
Here's Obama with a tortured answer on negotiating with Hamas.
It is very hard to negotiate with a group that is not representative of a nation state, does not recognize your right to exist, uh, has consistently used terror as a weapon, and is deeply influenced by other countries.
Oh my god.
I think that Hamas's leadership will have to make a decision at some point as to whether it is a serious political party seeking to represent the aspirations of the Palestinian people.
Oh, come on!
You can't be serious.
As a consequence, willing to recognize Israel's right to exist and renounce violence as a tool to achieve its aims.
Uh, or whether it wants to continue to operate as a terrorist organization.
What do you think?
Ladies and gentlemen, I am near speechless.
That doesn't happen often.
Once again, history began today.
None of this has ever been known.
Do you realize that these pronouncements, these answers to questions are simply setting the table as the way things are?
That's all he's doing.
He's saying, yeah, Iran's a bad guy.
And Hamas is going to have to make up their mind, whether they want to join the League of Nations or they want to continue to be terrorists.
What do you think they're going to do?
Have they renounced?
Will they renounce their desire to blow Israel off the map or march all the Jews into the Mediterranean?
No.
This is what you get.
This guy doesn't think he hasn't, he is a product of what he has learned in the classrooms at Harvard and some of these other Ivy League places that he has been.
He is classic here in his he's an appeaser.
He thinks this is tough talk.
These people are, they are salivate.
I guarantee you, these groups are going to send emissaries to the United States to campaign for this guy.
They might even send campaign contributions.
Laundered, of course.
Mind boggling.
Now, what's mind boggling?
He can say what he wants.
He can go out, he can make it.
He's making a fool of himself here if anybody listens to any of this stuff substantively, but they're not.
Not in the drive-by media, because again, it doesn't matter what he's saying.
He is making history, and the drive-by's want to make history.
The drive-by's want to be in on this history making, and so they have to deflect attention away from what he says is what he says.
A sixth grader, well, a sixth grader 40 years ago would be able to say what Obama is saying today.
Might take a junior in college these days to have been educated to this point.
But this is being treated as revolutionary, as unique, as unprecedented.
Glowing, glowing revelations of pure intelligence.
Why?
This is so presidential.
This is not presidential.
This is pathetic.
This is embarrassing.
This is ignorance.
You are listening to syllable after syllable after syllable when they're all put together.
It equals ignorance.
This is Hamas is going to have to make a decision at some point as to whether it's a serious political party seeking to represent the aspirations of the Palestinian people.
Let's move on.
Washington Post editorial today.
And there's a by the way, they're hitting him.
Today, and I'm going to tell you why, I think.
The initial media coverage of Barack Obama's visit to Iraq suggested that the Democrat candidate found agreement with his plan to withdraw U.S. combat forces on a 16-month timetable.
So writes the Washington Post, it seems worthwhile to point out that by Mr. Obama's own account, neither, neither U.S. commanders nor Iraq principal political leaders actually support his strategy.
Oh.
Heresy, ladies and gentlemen, heresy.
This is worse than Ball's Judas Act yesterday.
The Washington Post editorial just pointed out that neither U.S. commanders nor Iraq's principal political leaders actually support Obama's strategy.
General Petraeus, the architect of the dramatic turnaround in U.S. fortunes, does not want a timetable, Mr. Obama reported with welcome candor during a news conference yesterday in an interview with the American Barack Channel.
He explained that there are two deep concerns about a timetable that doesn't take into account what American commanders anticipate might be some sort of change in conditions.
Iraqi Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki, who has a history of tailoring his public statements for public purposes, more on that in a moment, made headlines by saying that he would support a withdrawal of American forces by 2010.
But an Iraqi government statement made clear that Mr. Maliki's timetable would extend at least seven months beyond Obama's.
More significant, it would be a timetable which Iraqis set, not the Washington imposed schedule that Mr. Obama has in mind.
It would also be conditioned on the readiness of Iraqi forces, the same linkage that General Petraeus seeks.
As Obama put it, Mr. Maliki wants some flexibility in terms of how that's carried out.
Other Iraqi leaders were more directly critical of the Messiah.
As Mr. Obama acknowledged, Sunni leaders in Anbar province told him that American troops are essential to maintaining the peace among Iraq's rival sects, and said they were worried about a rapid drawdown.
Yet Mr. Obama's account of his strategic vision remains eccentric.
He insists that Afghanistan is the central front for the United States, along with the border areas of, as he says, Pakistan.
But there are no known Al Qaeda bases in Afghanistan.
Taliban, yes.
No known Al Qaeda bases in Afghanistan.
And any additional U.S. forces sent there would not be able to operate in the Pakistani territories where bin Laden is headquartered.
While the United States has an interest in preventing the resurgence of the Afghan Taliban, as he pronounces it, the country's strategic importance pales beside that of Iraq.
Shazam.
Did you hear that, Brian?
The Washington Post just said that the whole mission in Afghanistan pales compared to the importance of Iraq, which lies at the geopolitical center of the Middle East and contains some of the world's largest oil reserve.
Oh no, the Washington Post, ladies and gentlemen, stop the presses.
This is true Judas behavior.
Washington Post lead editorial just said two things.
Iraq, far more important than Afghanistan.
Reason oil.
The left fring, uh left wing fringe newts, are going to be livid over this.
If Mr. Obama's anti-war stance has blinded him to those realities, that could prove far more debilitating to him as president than any particular timetable.
Now, some people might ask, hey Rush, because this happens every time something like this happens, people say, Rush, the media's starting to get it, or they really start to get it, and they really start to.
And I always sort of recoil when I hear this, because too many people on our side are looking for validation from the drive-by media.
In other words, when the drive-by media says we were right.
Yeah, yeah, we were right.
See, they say so.
We don't need them to say we're right.
I'll tell you what this is all about.
Washington Post's editorial page has been pretty consistent on the importance of Iraq.
The editorial page has.
They get it for some reason.
They understand it.
Number two.
I am convinced that the editorial writers of the Washington Post are themselves hurling at this coverage that Obama is getting from the traveling helicopter parents known as the drive-by media on this summer trip of his.
I think a lot of people in the media are.
Not a lot.
I think there are some who look at this.
This is not good for us.
This is not.
I mean, yeah, we're in a tag for the gap.
This doesn't even look professional.
This just looks like adoration.
This just looks like a rock concert.
It just looks like a bunch of teenagers dazzled by the presence of somebody without even caring what he says, knows, thinks, or is going to do.
And so the Post is trying to balance a little bit of this.
But at the same time, they're not going to change their minds about Obama.
They're going to vote Obama when the time comes.
They're going to endorse Obama when the time comes.
But at the same time, they will be able to have said, they, in the midst of all this fawning coverage, have been balanced.
Regardless of all that, they're right about everything they have written here.
And they have basically said Obama's a dunce.
He doesn't know what he's talking about.
That's the sum total.
That's the translation of this editorial.
And we are back.
El Rushboat, the cutting edge of societal evolution, the fastest week in media.
And the most listened to radio talk show in the country.
Abbott in Yonkers, New York.
We go to you first today, sir, and it's great to have you with us.
Hello.
Hi, thank you.
Nice speaking with you.
It's exciting.
It really is.
So uh I called because uh I recently I was on my cell phone looking through the news, and I was on CNN, unfortunately, and I saw an article on uh this commentary on Barack Obama, and so and the title was Why Americans Can't Good Over Race.
And the article talks about to Detoville, how Detoxville expressed that racism and prejudice was immovable, even if you abolish slavery.
And went on to say that Barack Obama is uh going to challenge this, and Americans have a historic chance to challenge this by voting for him.
And uh, I couldn't help but thinking about how this is pretty much uh uh ubiquitous in the media now, where uh it's if you vote for Obama, it you you have a chance to make history and end racism in America, but without looking at who the man is, without looking at his credentials.
Uh and I don't you think that it's it's absurd that everyone's going around talking about uh here's the here's the thing about this.
This the first thing, what this illustrates, something that I, ladies and gentlemen, coined as a descriptive phrase of the drive-by media, I mean, over 17 years ago, symbolism over substance.
The Democrat Party symbolism over substance the substance of Obama doesn't matter.
He is all symbolic.
He is iconic, and he is a symbol.
And he represents history in this case.
He represents the country shedding original sin, which is slavery.
Uh and and the drive-by's, they all come from the civil rights tradition.
Uh and so they're they're just ecstatic about this.
The CNN doing a story on this side, you don't have to tell me what it was.
I don't have to watch it to know what CNN did.
The dirty little secret is that it will do no such thing.
An Obama offendancy to the presidency will not aim or end the uh the the racist or the race business as it has come to exist.
The race, Shelby Steele had a piece in the Wall Street Journal, I think it was the Wall Street Journal recently, this week, and he said one of the keys to the race business, the Reverend Sharptons, the Reverend Dax, is to continue the notion of black inferiority.
Black inferiority.
That's the key for it all to work.
Blacks have to be inferior.
They have to be inferior on the basis of not who they are but the color of their skin.
And it is this inferiority that allows the race business hustlers to um use them for their own ends.
He talked about and how white guilt, which is a theme of Dr. Steele's white guilt is found at the at the root of uh of the race business and of much of the problems that we have in the country.
White guilt enables black inferiority.
The black culture promotes the inferiority by claiming we have a chance, we're black.
This country hates us.
Look at the past.
But there are heretics here.
There are conservative black Americans who are not inferior, obviously.
And of course, they represent a big threat.
They do not represent success.
They do not represent uh role models.
They do not show inferior people how to shed the inferiority complex and become something.
The Reverend Jackson says, you can be somebody, but he doesn't want that to happen.
He wants them to think they can, but they don't want him to act on it.
Because if they become somebody, become a traitor.
So Obama comes along, and one of the fears that the Reverend Jackson has, and the Reverend Sharp is, well, wait a minute.
These young, inferior, old, inferior feeling blacks who are made to feel that way, they look to the Oval Office of the White House, and there's one of them in there.
Now, how in the hell do you keep them feeling inferior?
He's at some point, all this inferiority is going to translate into a certain sense of pride among black people.
And once they stop feeling inferior, then the race business has a big problem, and that is one of the key reasons why the Reverend Dax wants to remove the Messiah's nuts.
We're just getting started, ladies and gentlemen.
We have two more big, exciting hours to go.
The Rush Limbaugh program, and they're coming up right after another windful profit timeout.
▲
Export Selection