All Episodes
Previous Next
July 15, 2008 - Rush Limbaugh Program
35:33
July 15, 2008, Tuesday, Hour #3
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen.
You are tuned to the trend setting, always leading and never following Rush Limbaugh program, often imitated, never equaled.
Always envied, but never compromised.
The Excellence in Broadcasting Network 800-282-2882 is the phone number.
If you want to be on the program, bow snerdly, official call screener today.
And the email address is L Rushbow at EIBNet.com.
It has been confirmed.
I missed this when talking to Natalie.
Dawn gave me the transcript.
Natalie from Charlottesville, Virginia said, I have to say that you have fallen into the liberals' hands on this.
You are sounding like a limousine conservative.
I mean, you are not, you're just giving them more fodder to run with saying, oh, those Republicans are so heartless and uncaring.
She may as well have called me harsh.
I mean, I spoke with her after this, and it's all it's all settled now.
But that's really an insult, limousine conservative.
Just so you people know, there is not a limousine out there that meets my standards.
I wouldn't be caught dead in one.
And to be called a limousine conservative.
I'm glad I did not hear that.
It might have changed the entire tenor of the whole call.
By the way, a slight correction here on the thing we've been discussing, Tammy May from Pennsylvania, the letter that she wrote doesn't change anything, but just a slight detail.
She did not write the letter to Senator Casey.
She wrote the letter to her local newspaper, a small town newspaper, and Senator Casey's office saw it, brought it to his attention, and he took that to the Senate hearing today in front of the chairman of the Federal Reserve.
So it doesn't change anything other than she didn't she didn't write Casey.
She wrote a letter to the editor of the newspaper, and in the letter to the editor of the newspaper, she said we have to reprioritize.
House comes first, daycare, gasoline, and food.
Those are the things that the new priorities.
Now get the call from Natalie in Charlottesville, West Virginia, who accused me of uh being a little harsh, not didn't use that word, but not really compassionate and understanding the situation.
Look, it's time for a little tough love.
I some of you might think what I'm going to say next is is uh lacking in compassion, but I assure you that it's not.
We have as a as an umbrella, or as a foundation rather, for what I'm going to say here.
We've got a big problem in this country, and it's a problem that's been big for a while, and it's growing.
And the problem is that way too many of our fellow citizens expect, and some of them even demand, that our government, which is nothing more than all the rest of us, take care of them.
One way, shape, manner, or form, be it health care, or be it a home mortgage when they can't afford it, or what, or what have you.
And the government is only too eager to comply because they love having people dependent on them, particularly liberal Democrat members of the government.
Now, we as conservatives believe in the concept of individual responsibility.
And when we say that, we get tarred and feathered as being heartless and cold and cruel.
What do you mean individual responsibility?
Easy for you to say.
But leftists are collectivists, and they think we uh all ought to be banded together and all have equal things.
Outcomes, houses, this sort of thing.
And until that situation exists in their minds, America is an unfair place.
Now adults have to make decisions about the families that they're going to start, how many kids they're going to have, the way in which they're going to live, whether they can afford to have a home, whether they have to rent instead at first, uh, you know, how many cars to buy or use public transit, how many televisions they're going to have in the house, how many computers, cable, All these things.
What kind of education that they hope to achieve?
What kind of job they want to pursue?
Whether they want to start their own business on and I mean, these are decisions that all of us should make for ourselves.
And most of us do.
But then at some point, when the decision goes wrong, way too many of us look for relief from Washington.
And say that the system screwed me.
And I need to have it made right.
Well, maybe the system did screw you.
But welcome to the club.
Everybody gets screwed now and then.
Contrary to what some people think, it's not a charmed life for everybody.
In fact, for very few.
Now, let's take a hypothetical situation.
Let's take a single mother of two living in Pennsylvania.
Who goes out and because some community organizer has lobbied Congress to make uh home mortgages available to people that can't afford them.
Our fictional character in Pennsylvania, mother of two, single mother two goes out and gets a house that she really can't afford.
But because it's the American dream and the members of Congress has mandated that this happened, the woman is secured for a loan and all of a sudden the rate goes up, and a problem because she can't pay for it.
She can't afford the monthly without maybe doing without food.
Or driving less.
And maybe got to pay for daycare because she has to go to work.
If she's got daycare, she got a job.
So she looks to the government, because the government roped her into buying a house, told her it was cool and hunky-dory, she thinks.
But the rest of us were not involved in her decision.
And this to me is the key.
I don't know this woman in Pennsylvania, and I don't know what she did.
And I don't know the circumstances, and yet the woman, and this is going to sound harsh, but it's folks, it's a problem.
We've gonna have to get a handle on this.
It's all around us what this is leading to.
The credit crunch, the mortgage crunch, uh entities that supposedly have assets backing their worth that don't have those assets.
You got Chuck Hugh Schumer out there starting runs on banks.
Stock markets, you know, going up and down, the gasoline price, the oil price, a lot of people are very much on the edge here.
And many of them are just, you know, they're like what the rest of us are.
They're just they're they're prisoners to these cycles.
But if, in the case of our fictional character in Pennsylvania, I had nothing to do, nor did you, with the decisions that she made.
And unless you and I are involved in the decisions that everybody else makes, which is not possible, then we can't know whether the decisions they've made are wise or unwise.
Now multiply that by millions of families.
In this country, we spend 3.1 trillion dollars a year.
This is not a safety net.
This is a hammock.
$3.1 trillion.
Most of us cannot put our arms around that.
Most of us have no concept of how much that is.
But it's enough that we're not talking about government creating a safety net.
We're talking about a massive government that is involved in all things and wants to be involved in even more.
3.1 trillion is not chump change.
It has become a hammock.
The consequence is regulations and taxes are in fact harming more and more families, making them poorer, and making it more difficult for them to succeed.
This much we know for sure.
This is what happens when government gets in your way.
The list of examples is endless.
From the family that goes out and buys a plot of ground and finds out later on that there's some sacred grouse on it, and they can't do anything with it.
Who says?
The government, some regulation.
Kangaroo wretch in Baker's field, California, farmer had to get rid of his farm.
Wetlands, this is the whole assault on private property rights is just one example.
San Francisco, or California, sorry, California is revying a statewide ban on trans fat.
Statewide.
It's in the San Francisco Chronicle today.
A statewide ban on trans fat.
Now, my friends, I don't know about you, but I think that is a waste of time.
It is a waste of bureaucratic involvement and money.
It is none of their business.
This notion that we are too stupid to protect ourselves and ensure our own good health, and therefore somebody has to.
And they might make a claim to saying they have to protect our health, because after all, they're paying for our health care, and they want it to be as little as possible they have to pay, so we're going to have to live under their guidelines.
Since they're paying our health care.
The minute you surrender responsibility for yourself to somebody else, then they own you.
And in this case, if it's the government telling you that they're going to pay for your health care, then they're next going to tell you what you can and can't eat, what you can and can't smoke, where you can and can't eat it.
Thank you.
They're going to make your life a living hell of regulation.
This is already happening.
It's happening incrementally.
We sit around, oh, they're so benevolent, they're so good-hearted, they're just trying to save our lives, they're trying to keep us healthy.
Not doing that at all.
They're simply exercising control.
So the decisions that people make oftentimes are the result of obstacles placed in their way by a government that they think loves them and cares for them.
And so their taxes have to go up and the regulations increase, and they are poorer, and they have more difficulty, people have more difficulty getting ahead financially because of all of these obstacles.
At the same time, the government sits around and laments how stupid people are.
Thinks, well, you know, we they don't know what to eat right, they don't know how to drive right, they don't know to do this or that.
We need to take care of them, and we need to make sure that they do this because they have no faith in you.
You have faith in them, you think they're benevolent, think they're out to help you.
They look down on you.
And when I say government, I'm talking about leftist activist government.
The problem is that the Republican Party has signed on to this the past couple years, too, and they've kind of lost their identity on this whole notion of limited government.
The bottom line is that the federal government imposes on every family in this country hundreds of thousands of dollars in obligations from its entitlement programs, insurance programs, and nobody ever talks about this because we all, or some people, not all, but some people think this is all done to help us.
But every time this kind of this way of managing a society and managing a society's affairs has been tried, it has failed miserably, and people end up revolting against it.
In many cases, by trying to leave the country that has kill them prisoner, in which case many of them got shot trying to go over a wall or underneath the fence.
Now we're not there yet, and don't anybody misunderstand me here.
But for all these people that are out there in a genuine state of fear over what they see on the news every day, writing letters to little newspapers saying we need to reprioritize.
We, not the letter writer, we need to reprioritize.
That means this letter writer wants a central authority to implement what she thinks is good.
Now imagine if she hates smokers, or imagine if she hates jet airplanes, or imagine if she hates going to the beach.
She writes too many people going to the beach or destroying the beach, the beach should be for animals and birds and so forth and the crabs or whatever.
We need to get on this and see if we protect the beach.
Some politicians are going to pick it up.
Anyway, a little long here.
I've got a brief tip.
But the thing I'm trying to say here is individual responsibility is something that we all at some point in our lives exercise.
And it's somewhere down the line, too many of us abandon it and sacrifice it when our decisions may didn't turn out the way we wanted to, and there's a little pain or suffering.
So we turn to someplace for help and assistance, and that can become habit forming or addictive.
And we've gotten to the point now where there are many people who have simply surrendered their own individual liberty and sovereignty because it's easier.
Meanwhile, the rest of us pay for it.
And when we try to help fix the problem, go back to be self-responsing and take care of yourself.
Be responsible.
You'll be happier.
You'll accomplish more.
You're better than you think you can be.
You're far more qualified and capable than even you know, but you're never going to experience that if you give up and let people pigeonhole you into some area where you're only good for this or that.
We say things like that, and they say, well, it's easy for you to say, but it's really harsh.
It's really harsh.
Anyway, brief time out, ladies and gentlemen.
The El Rushable show continues.
Your phone calls are next after this.
Hang on just No!
This is stupid.
So Diane Feinstein's being interviewed on Fox, and she's been asked the question, what's the most important thing we can do?
What is the what's your plan?
What is the most important thing we can do to bring down the price of oil?
She said, Explore alternatives.
Now, Diane Feinstein may be a wonderful woman.
She might be a lovely lady, but would somebody explain to me why she's an expert when it comes to energy.
This is another one of my bugaboos.
We elect these people to go to Washington, House and Senate, and immediately upon them is conferred expert status.
And then she opens her mouth and proves she doesn't know diddly squat about what we're talking about here.
What's the first thing we could do to lower prices?
Well, I'll get out of oil.
Yeah, and use what?
The four wind turbines at Rockport, Missouri.
Uh, let's see.
This is Lamore, California.
Graham in Lamore, California.
Hi, Graham.
Nice to have you with us.
Uh, yes, sir.
Good afternoon.
Uh U.S. Navy carrier aviator fuel dumping mega dittoes from a lifelong rush baby.
Thanks very much.
By the way, confirm something for me, if you will.
Yes, sir.
You gotta dump the fuel before landing on the carrier.
You do it at an altitude, it it it evaporates before it actually hits the ocean, right?
Yes, sir, that's right.
So flipper actually doesn't get hurt.
No, no, sir.
It's not like the uh the X RB is any kind of in for a landing, so damn it.
Okay, that's what I thought.
Sorry to disappoint you.
Uh, thanks for that for clearing that up for me.
Yes, sir, yes, sir.
It's an honor to talk to you, sir, and uh, I just wanted to make a connection between Tammy May Letter and uh your points about personal responsibility with the people who have been calling about the uh the election, calling your program about the election in the recent weeks.
Uh it seems to me like a lot of Republicans are looking for you to tell us how to vote or how to elect McCain or asking you to flip some kind of magic switch to uh get Mitt Romney in in the White House.
Uh and it seems to me that Phil Graham was essentially right about winers, uh, and that includes a lot of Republicans, uh they're looking to you for an answer when in reality the answer lies in taking responsibility for our vote and in getting informed and in uh figuring out what issues are important to us to elect people in office that are going to do something about that.
This is uh for the most part true, but the people that you're referring to who are calling me, I I think you're slightly misunderstanding.
They are essentially telling me I am lazy, and that I could be doing much, much more.
And if I were doing much, much more, it would create even more leadership and more people would be rallied to the cause and so forth.
I I never thought I'd say this, but I I disagree.
Your job is not to command us, your job is to inform us on the issues and to tell us about what's going on in the world so that we can impact our community on a local level.
Our job is to Is to go out and you make the change happen.
You are one man with one vote.
You are exactly right.
You you're right on the money.
There's only been one exception to that, Graham.
Okay.
Operation Chaos, when I did assume the role of commander, and I did issue orders.
But even then, those orders were still elective on the part of the uh part of the troops.
So I guess yeah, you're right, through and through.
You get it.
Ha!
Great to have you back, Rush Limbaugh, the cutting edge of societal evolution.
The New York Times has a story today.
And it's just it's just hilarious.
All these late-night comedy shows and their writers are lamenting that there just isn't anything funny about Obama.
And so they're having trouble, and they really believe in Obama, and they don't they really don't want to make a whole lot of jokes about it, but they say they can't find anything to be that's funny about Obama.
I kid you not.
It's right here, Snurtley, it's right here in the New York Times.
It's it's just it's uh uh want Obama in a punchline, first find a joke.
It's by Bill Carter, the TV writer.
We got plenty of them.
Just ask us.
We'd be glad to help him write some late night jokes about Obama.
But there has been little humor about Mr. Obama.
About his age, his speaking ability, his intelligence, his family, his physique, and within a late-night landscape dominated by white hosts, white writers, and overwhelmingly white audiences, there has been almost no humor or comment about his race.
We're doing jokes about people in his orbit, not really about him, said Mike Sweeney, the head writer for uh Conan O'Brien.
The jokes will come, uh representatives of the late night shows said when Mr. Obama does or says something that defines him in comedy terms.
Jeez.
Do you people know what flip-flops are?
I mean, that's the easiest way to explain this.
You don't think you've got jokes.
You had jokes about John Kerry.
You've got jokes about Obama.
Um I know there's they're scared to death because Obama's put out the orders.
This is off limits, that's off limits, this is off limits.
Can't talk about any of those things.
Here's uh here's Curtis in Fort Wayne, Indiana.
Hi, Curtis.
Uh hello, sir.
Uh recently I I heard a Democratic spokesperson was talking about the wonders of wind and solar and stuff, and somebody said, Well, what about people who can't afford uh the price of gas?
And she said, Well, they should get a house closer to work, and if you know that's too expensive, they can always buy a new hybrid.
And I thought this was so absurd.
Somebody should turn it into an ad, show like a royal coach in the palace at Versailles, and Marie Antoinette telling someone, well, the peasants have no money to I mean, if the peasants have no bread, they should they should eat cake.
Then show a senator with a private jet and a multimillion dollar estate, and this uh democratic spokesperson say, Well, if you can't afford gas, you should buy a new hybrid car.
You know about that, Marie Antoinette quote.
I've always liked cake better than bread.
I I have never understood that quote.
Let them eat cake.
I'd I'd rather eat cake than bread.
Any day.
But anyway.
Yeah.
Um this Democrat spokesman has no clue how expensive a hybrid is.
Well, exactly.
If you can't afford gas, how are you going to afford to buy a house closer to work or to buy a new car?
That's absurd.
Well, they should have just cut to the chase and look, move in and and get mass transit.
But the point is, yes, these these are these are these are people that are trying to control people's lives and and uh and and and not notice notice every circumstance, individual circumstance that if the somebody confronts, a liberal's idea is always get smaller, downsize, uh become less prosperous.
It's never shoot for the moon.
Liberals never tell you, gut it up.
If you want to buy a new car, go out and work hard for it, find a job if you want it if a gas need is getting too expensive, find a way to afford it.
Because doing that, see, that's harsh.
Well, I I just think that it's interesting that you know the the the talking point is, you know, they question if if uh drilling will yield fast enough results or if it'll yield uh a big enough effect on price.
Now I think what people should say is, you know, you should question why they don't want to do everything they can to lower the price.
Exactly.
They don't want to lower the price.
They want misery.
If I'm understanding you correctly, they want the people we're talking about here want misery in people's lives Going into the election.
They want people mad and unhappy.
It's like Diane Feinstein would just ask this question on Fox.
What's what's the number one thing that you would do to bring down the price of oil?
Find a substitute for it.
That's just absurd.
It's just irresponsibly absurd.
Makes no sense whatsoever.
And yet these people are considered the wizards of smart.
I so many things, if you get too caught up in it, you're going to go insane.
You got it, you gotta be able to laugh at this stuff.
At least sometimes.
Mike in Brooklyn, uh, nice to have you, sir on the EIB network.
Hello.
Thank you, Rush.
Um, I wanted to ask you, how can you shough off the fact that the big oil people are not using the 68 million acres already allotted to them?
Are they deliberately, you know, trying to twist our arm to make us say, Uncle, so they can drill other places?
Uh, I think you're buying into a little bit of leftist propaganda.
Uh if they don't find any oil or explore on those leases they own, they lose the money that they paid for the lease.
If they're not, if they're not doing things there, it must mean that they haven't found any.
Well, you know, you're you're you're this, you know, this is amazing to me.
This really is amazing to me.
Here we have a circumstance.
We've got rising oil prices, which are leading to rising gasoline prices.
And instead of an honest intellectual curiosity from people how to fix it, somehow we've got to blame big oil.
All of a sudden now, what we've I've I've seen this floating around.
I sat there at the liberal blogs, it's out there all over the place.
Well, big oil's got 68 million acres, and they're not even using Now.
Why do they need more of them drill off curious?
As though there's some giant conspiracy that big oil doesn't really want to drill, it just wants to have all this area tied up.
If they buy a lease, they have X amount of time to start working on that property, that territory and area, and if they don't, they lose it and they lose the money.
The president explained this today.
There is you got to Sir you need to get on the bed.
The villain now is the speculators.
Your side has left big oil off the highway now.
Big oil is no longer guilty.
The speculators are guilty.
He do I shrug off?
Why don't I shrug off?
This is sometimes it it is a genuine challenge here.
That common sense is perceived to be so damn rare as to be intelligence.
Common sense is not intelligence.
If you have a modicum of common sense, the odds are people are going to think you're a genius because there's so little common sense running around.
Supply and demand.
We are producing as much as we are using.
We need to produce more.
Who cares who profits?
Somebody's going to.
I would much rather have big oil profit than big government profit.
Just give me the damn oil.
That's all I care about.
The market will take care of the price.
Start worried about conspiracies.
They're not using leases that they have now, 68 million acres.
Get a life for crying out loud.
You see a red light, big oil putting the red light up, or all green lights to make you burn more gasoline, so you gotta buy more for what how do you people think?
What must it be like to get up and see the devil behind every automobile behind every person?
The devil is that what must it?
What must it be like to live the life you liberals lead?
Always suspecting everybody.
Always suspecting everybody of doing something to screw you.
When you are the ones doing the screwing to everybody else.
Good grief.
I gotta take a break here.
I'm close to profanity again here and I can't go there.
My friends, I'm sitting here still fuming over this.
Left just will not give it up.
The oil companies.
Here we have genuine ignorance and stupidity on parade on the Fox News channel with Diane Fein.
Here, listen to this.
What's the soundbite number?
I just told you the number 27.
Martha McCallum is talking to Diane Feinstein.
Here's the question.
Tell me what you think is the number one thing, the number one thing we can do.
Everybody wants to see these prices come down.
What is your point?
The number one thing we can do.
The main thing we can do is push as hard as we can to move away from fossil fuel use.
To develop those alternatives as quickly as we can.
Solar, wind, hybrids, hydrogen, conservation, uh biofuels, all of those things that can make America truly energy independent and solve what is becoming a major problem.
And not one of them is going to bring the price of oil down.
Not one of them is online and workable for decades.
If then.
So in the meantime, we have this, which is supposed to be brilliant, coming from the United States Senator.
They're smarter than the rest of us, folks.
This is what we should do.
This is the advice we should follow.
And we got people out there going, I love Dai Fi.
She's so smart.
Yes, yes.
No more fossil fuels.
Ha!
Then we got somebody calling here wants beat up on the oil companies.
Now there's a lot of stupidity that just happened here, and it isn't anything in the oil companies of what they do.
From the Wall Street Journal, companies don't know how much oil is under the lands that they lease.
They don't know it, liberals.
Unlike you, who know everything.
So what they do, liberals, they buy up large swathes.
They lease large swaths of land, hoping that a fraction will work out and produce some oil and gas.
Much of the area that isn't producing, they say doesn't have oil or gas commercially viable quantities.
Moreover, bringing uh a new field into production can require years of mapping and testing and drilling and construction, during which time the land would show up in statistics as being not in production, even as companies spend millions or more out there.
So while you think that 68 million acres is not being used, they're probably out there on a lot of them right now trying to find if they're worthwhile, but they're listed as not in production because they're not producing anything.
Not a word, not a word about these left-wing groups, these environmentalist wackos who try to stop all this with lawsuit after lawsuit after lawsuit.
They try to stop or delay drilling.
This is happening all the time.
Now they're using the Endangered Species Act to do this, and they're using the polar bear and the EPA and so forth.
Why don't you complain about them?
You want to talk about who's responsible for oil and fossil fuel prices going up, friend.
It is your friends on the left that are directly responsible for this.
I don't care if they're elected.
I don't care if there's some bunch of people that live off donations, don't even have the guts or the ability to get a real job.
They just go out and send out fundraising letters, and idiots like you send them money, thinking that you are saving the planet.
Biggest bunch of dupes.
Most liberals are just duped.
The leadership liberals are vicious Stalinists, but most liberals are just a bunch of dupes.
Meaningless lives wanting to matter, and they buy into this notion that their stupid cell phone charger is destroying the planet.
I wish we could institutionalize all of them with global warming derangement syndrome or whatever they claimed it down in Australia.
Kid that wouldn't drink any water because he thought the world would run out if he had a glass.
That's the answer.
Well, you got plenty of places.
Who's next?
Joel in St. Louis.
Hi, Joel.
Nice to have you on the EIB network.
Hello.
Oh, good afternoon, Rush.
Yes, sir.
Um, that statement that Marie Antoinette made is regarding cake.
Uh, the cake that she was referring to is the black stuff that was left over when they bread would burn and fall to the bottom of the oven, they'd scrape the oven and that was the black uh soot.
So that she was just saying, well, they can't breathe.
Well, see, I've wondered about this because I much rather have cake than bread.
And I never understood that.
I I there is, by the way, some serious historical disagreement that she even ever said it.
Right.
She probably didn't say it.
Somebody did, but it wasn't her.
It was they think it was some uh uh uh tw somebody wrote about it even twenty years before she was born, Jean-Jean Crusoe or some such thing, and some Spanish queen visiting or something.
But she may have never even said it.
But thank you for the explanation.
Who knew?
Who knew that cake meant burnt waste back in the days of Marie Antoinette?
Who knew?
But now it makes sense to me.
It didn't before.
Gary in Newberry, Florida, you're next on the EIB network, sir.
Hello.
Oh, thank you so much, Rush.
Yes.
Give them heck.
That glass guy was the type guy before last was just so funny.
Well, you know, I kind of blew up at the guy, but uh it was as much as attitude as at anything.
But it no, it was I'm sorry, it wasn't attitude.
I'm getting to the point, this is just one of these days where I have little patience for ignorance.
Well, you should have told him the truth that that we're not gonna pump oil till it gets to 200 a barrel.
We're not gonna stop oil till it gets to 200.
Well, you mean stop drilling for it?
We're not gonna drill for it till it gets to 200 a barrel.
Who?
Big oil is not gonna be a big deal.
Yeah, they're like, really, that would have made us day.
That would have been well.
I wish I'd have thought of that.
Listen, what I want to talk to you about was the letter that Bob Casey read.
I can't see anywhere in the Constitution that he has the right to ask the federal government to help this lady whatsoever.
Uh no, it's it's not there, but that that's you can come up with legislation that they've done it.
That uh Well, they have, but it's you know.
Why didn't he just simply go around his office with a cup and shake his office people down?
That's not what it's not even about this, it's not even about Tammy May.
It's a it's it's about trying to create a national crisis on C-SPAN in the minds of as many Americans as possible who want to that Casey wants people to think that everybody is as is as forlorn as Tammy May is, which will then prompt more and more government action to deal with all the Tammy Mays out there.
It's just terrible.
It's gotten terrible.
It's a hideous, insidious plot.
And you know, it I didn't help her have her children.
And you know, why did she ask her husband to help out?
Uh she's a single mother.
Oh, I'm sorry.
Single mother.
Which, by the way, by the way, that is a made-to-order circumstance.
The feminists love it.
Liberals love it because when you don't have a husband, and you have kids, and you're a woman, you need something because you gotta work.
You need a second income, and guess who's right there?
Bob Casey.
Not personally, but the government.
It's no different than what what what all these great and well-intentioned and big hearted government programs did to the black family.
They ripped them apart because a husband, the father wasn't necessary.
So now single mothers, for whatever reason.
I mean, they're they're being hotly pursued now by the Democrat Party for uh for votes.
And they, of course, are victims too.
They're victims of an unfair gender.
Mailed them.
They're victims of an unfair society.
Uh men just, you know, just wanted them for the sex, gave them a couple kids, and then split the scene when the responsibilities got.
It's just a horrible existence for women in America.
We all know this.
So there's the government right there to to pick up the slack.
Brief time out, my friends will be back and wrap it up.
Sadly, right after this.
I want to just close this program out with one thought, ladies and gentlemen.
Who is it that gets all upset over cartoons?
We know the end who gets upset about cartoons?
Radical Muslims get upset over cartoons.
▲
Export Selection