All Episodes
Previous Next
July 10, 2008 - Rush Limbaugh Program
35:30
July 10, 2008, Thursday, Hour #3
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Hi, how are you?
Welcome, ladies and gentlemen, to Castrati Thursday on the EIB Network.
Rush Limbaugh from the distinguished and prestigious Limbaugh Institute for Advanced Conservative Studies.
It's great to have you with us.
The telephone number is 800-282-2882 if you want to join us today.
And of course, the email address is lrushbow at EIBnet.com.
I mentioned this earlier in the program, my friends.
Last night, minding my own business, as I always do, working feverishly on show prep for this program, became aware of a blog posting at ABC News.
In fact, let me go over here and get this.
Limbaugh Begins Second Phase of Operation Chaos is the headline.
And I read this piece, and I forget the blogger at ABC who posted it, but it was panic-filled.
It was, well, not panic-filled, but you could read there was an element of fright in this.
That I had initiated phase two of Operation Chaos centered around the Democrat Party platform and the way they're going to write it this year.
They're going to have this big smoke and mirrors thing where in all 47 states, they're going to have a bunch of places where you, the average voter, can walk in there and sit down with actual real elitist Democrat operatives and write the Democrat Party platform.
That's what they want you to think.
I said, wow, what a golden opportunity for Operation Chaos troops to go in there and infiltrate this and try to get conservatism written into the Democrat Party platform.
Well, later on, after the ABC News blog story hit, the Democrat National Committee says, come on in.
They posted something on their own website from Michael Yockey, the party's national platform director.
And this is what he said.
We'd like to thank Rush Limbaugh for publicizing the Listening to America events and extend an open invitation to him and his listeners to attend.
The Democrat Party is not afraid to listen to the wide array of views the American people have on issues they care about.
That's what makes our nation strong.
People across the country of all political persuasions are tired of business as usual in Washington and people like Limbaugh, who are more concerned with scoring political points than changing the direction of our country.
They still don't get me.
Changing the direction of the country is what I'm totally about by diminishing liberalism and Democrats.
At any rate, unlike John McCain and the Republican Party, the Lord Messiah, Barack Obama, and the Democrat National Committee are encouraging Americans across the country to get involved, make their voices heard.
And then in quotes from Michael Yockey, if Limbaugh's ditto heads want to join other Americans, united in their belief that their voices should be heard in Washington, talking about their hopes, their dreams, and concerns in their living rooms, community centers, and churches, and reporting back on these discussions to the platform drafting committee, then they are welcome to join one of the 655 events in 47 states organized in just 24 hours.
So I don't know where I don't know what churches are going to meet in, but it's up to Operation Chaos Troops to find out.
I mean, in 47 states, 655 events.
My friends, do you see what's happening here?
No longer do we have to infiltrate.
You have been invited by the Democrat.
You can wear your uniform.
You can wear your Operation Chaos gear.
You can wear your Operation Chaos t-shirt and hat.
And you can walk, and they are going to welcome you, it says here.
Now we all know the truth here.
The truth was to be found in the ABC blog post last night.
That headline might as well have said, uh-oh.
Oh, no.
You know, behind the scenes, they know Operation Chaos Phase 1 was successful.
And they're sitting around and they're basically saying, damn it, we weren't thinking.
And we're going to have Limbaugh's people in here.
So they go to their website, make it sound like, come on in, we'd love to have you here and so forth.
Well, the invitation has been extended, ladies and gentlemen.
You Operation Chaos troops now no longer have to operate in covert fashion.
You will not be threatened with indictment or jail like you were during the election.
You know what will happen?
Well, I don't want to maybe give them the idea, but I, you know, if this really gets big, if there are enough Operation Chaos troops, if a number of you actually infiltrate, I imagine that they'll have a plan to set up freedom cages and put you all in there.
While the rest of the citizens sit at whatever locations they sit and write what will never be read by the Democrat Party platform.
The bottom line is this is a giant smoke and mirrors thing.
So you might be as well in a rush.
Why should we do it?
For the fun of it, to go into a Democrat Party meeting which supposedly is going to write the platform.
You know all these rank and file Democrat schlubs are going to go in there thinking they matter.
They're thinking Obama's going to read everything they care about.
They're going to be dead serious.
And you go in there.
You are of good cheer.
You're having a great time.
And every platform idea you have is tax cut this, tax cut that.
Let's finally make it official.
We need to overturn Roe vs. Wade and then watch the fireworks.
Hell's bells, folks.
By the way, special announcement from the Justice Brothers.
My friends.
No.
An emergency action update from the Justice Brothers.
By now, you've probably heard that one of us has had an open mic accident.
And it wasn't me.
And I have broadcast insurance from the Justice Brothers.
Now we have an opportunity to brainstorm and show you how hard we work to protect you from catastrophic stupidity.
Loss.
Yeah.
First, we will attempt to defuse the situation by coming up with a plausible and pliable excuse like I misspoke.
Yeah, what I meant to say was this is a tough one.
I was misquoted.
But they were courting you.
That's not me.
That's it.
That's all you got?
I was in another dimension?
Yeah, let's go to that one.
See, it's just that simple.
And we'll work just as hard for you.
Broadcast insurance from the Justice Brothers.
Smart, street-wise protection from open microphones.
With all his flip-flopping around, he should have been glad I said a hat in the gone there.
Hey, Jesse, you don't look so good.
You want to go shake somebody down?
No.
We can do something easy like march out in front of a fast food place against greasy food and calories.
No.
Are you sure?
It'll make you feel better.
Well, it would be fun to shake some green from the machine.
Hey, is your mic still on?
Are you kidding?
Sad news, ladies and gentlemen, out of Tokyo.
A Japanese labor bureau has ruled that one of Toyota's top car engineers died from working too many hours.
This is the latest in a string of such findings in a nation where extraordinarily long hours for some employees has long been the norm.
The man who died was 45 years old.
He had been under severe pressure as the lead engineer in developing a hybrid version of Toyota's blockbuster Camry line.
The man's identity is being withheld at the request of his family, who continue to live in Toyota City, Toyota City, where the company is based.
In the last two months of his life, the man averaged more than 80 hours of overtime per month.
He regularly worked nights and weekends, was frequently sent abroad, and was grappling with shipping a model for the pivotal North American International Auto Show in Detroit when he died of heart disease in January 2006.
The man's daughter found his body at their home the day before he was to leave for the United States.
Global warming has claimed yet another victim.
We heard yesterday of the sad case of a 17-year-old kid in Australia who had to be checked into the psycho ward because he refused to drink water, fearing that if he did, the world would run out of it.
Global warming delusion syndrome.
And now a man working on a hybrid has literally worked himself to death.
Brief timeout, ladies and gentlemen.
We'll be back.
Your phone calls and other exciting things yet to happen here on Castrati Thursday on the EIB network.
Amidst billowing clouds of fragrant, aromatic first and second-hand premium cigar smoke, I am Rush Limboy here on the Excellence in Broadcasting Network.
All right.
Senator Phil Graham, you may have heard about this, ladies and gentlemen.
Phil Graham did an interview with the Washington Times, and he is a top economic advisor to Senator McCain.
Phil Graham, finally, we got some hard-hitting truth from the McCain campaign.
Phil Graham referred to the economic slowdown as a mental recession and called the United States a nation of whiners.
Mike Allen, writing about this at thepolitico.com, says that these comments by Phil Graham could hurt McCain's efforts to convince working-class Americans that McCain feels their pain.
Democrats immediately condemn the remarks as callous, quickly began working to gain widespread attention to them.
Democrat National Committee issued a statement titled Out of Touch Much Phil.
A McCain official said that Mr. Graham was simply saying that we are laying out the economic plan this week.
The plan is comprehensive, building immediate near-term relief for Americans hurting today, as well as longer-term solutions to get our economy back on track.
Anyway, McCain has now denounced Phil Graham.
McCain has said that he, look, I've just got sick and tired of saying all this.
These people work for me.
He doesn't speak for me.
He ever did.
That's what he said.
So Phil Graham doesn't speak for him.
This is tough love.
Look at all he meant by mental recession is that the drive-bys have created a negative economic picture far worse than reality.
You know, I've made it a point to do some studies.
I mean, these are anecdotal, but I flip around.
Last night I tried this.
You know, I haven't done this in a long time, but I flicked around to every baseball game I could find on television.
And I was stunned.
For the most part, 80% occupancy or more in the stands.
It takes a lot of gasoline to get there.
A lot of $10 hot dogs.
$5 for a thimble of beer.
People are still there.
The yeah, but not saying that it's problematic with $4 plus gasoline and so forth, but the idea that we're in a recession, we're not in a recession.
And yet, all Phil Graham was saying was that, you know, you know what he was saying?
It really comes down to buck up with a B. Buck up, America.
Buck up.
Anybody can hang around and whine and hear a bunch of negative talk and react to it.
That's not who Americans are.
But then when we have mothers breaking down into tears, when little eight-year-olds go to summer camp, the buck up message might not be properly understood.
Anyway, the Lord Messiah Barack Obama has reacted this afternoon in Fairfax, Virginia.
Former Senator Phil Graham said that we're merely in a mental recession.
That's what he said.
Said, we're in a mental recession.
He didn't say this, but I guess what he meant was that it's a figment of your imagination, these high gas prices.
Senator Graham then deemed the United States, and I quote, a nation of whiners.
Stop the tape of setting.
A nation of whiners.
Yeah, I'll tell you why it's a nation of whiners because your party is a bunch of whiners.
Your party has a patent on whining.
All your party does is whine each and every day, from Harry Reid to Nancy Pelosi, whine and moan and complain and accuse.
And you do too.
Senator Obama, you don't care about the high gas price.
Here's the rest of this statement.
Now, this comes after Senator McCain recently admitted that his energy proposals for the gas tax holiday and the drilling will have mainly, quote, psychological benefits.
I want all of you to know that America already has one Dr. Phil.
We don't need another one when it comes to the economy.
We need somebody to actually solve the economy.
It's not just a figment of your imagination.
What in the solve the economy?
There is no such thing, sir, as solving the economy.
You might be well advised to try to understand the economy, and then you would realize that solving it is just another problem.
And liberals think they have all the answers.
Birmingham, Alabama, this is David.
I'm glad you called, sir.
Nice to have you on the Russian Limbaugh program.
Thank you, Rush.
Southern Hospitality, six-figure income earning, SUV driving, gun-carrying dittos to you, sir.
Another bitter clinger has called in from our absolutely.
And congratulations on the new contract.
You're still underpaid.
Thank you, sir, very, very much.
Well, thank you.
I'm just ready for Senator McCain to go to the closet, find that shoebox he put his cojones in, and put them back on for a while.
You know, I mean, the guy is just becoming a nadless wonder.
I mean, it's frustrating.
I mean, everything when Obama says something, well, you know, he just wants to mealy mouth around about it.
Put his foot down, challenge him to some debates, challenge him to stand up in front of his own and not with his string pullers to talk.
He can't.
He's clueless.
He has challenged.
Well, he's challenged him to town hall meetings, but Obama wisely said no.
Exactly.
He needs to keep challenging him.
He needs to keep on.
I mean, stand up.
I mean, just like all this terrorist stuff.
We're not going to be attacked or not.
I don't think you understand this.
David, McCain is running an honorable campaign.
Honor can have pride to it.
I mean, act like you got it, Pair, McCain, if you're listening.
I mean, don't be afraid to stand up.
There's a lot of Americans out there who believe it.
I mean, it's scary.
I mean, part of me almost thinks we're going to have to endure four years of Obama just so we can, you know, like we had to endure four years of Carter, you know, because as great as Reagan was, Carter made him better.
Well, maybe Senator McCain will get around to Obama once he finishes denouncing all his supporters.
I hope so.
I hope so.
But, Rush, thank you so much.
Keep up a good fight, sir.
Thanks, David, very much.
Robert in Cincinnati, welcome to the EIB Network, sir.
Hello.
Hey, how are you doing, Rush?
Just fine, sir.
Thank you.
Yeah, I was calling about the proposal for the 55-mile-an-hour speed limit.
Yeah, one of my favorite topics.
Well, I just think that I've never heard that slowing down and taking longer is beneficial to anybody.
I don't know where that would help.
I've never heard that on any job I've ever had to slow down and take longer doing something.
You've never heard you have you.
The only time I've ever heard that, Rush, is from my wife.
Yeah, yeah, I was going to ask you.
I was going to suggest here that you had to have heard it at some point early in the marriage.
That's what I'm saying.
Exactly.
Slow down and take longer, yes.
Well, you know, that's true.
You have to calculate the value of time lost.
You know, people are just not out joyriding around.
They're going places because they have to get someplace.
Exactly.
Take longer to get his produce to the market.
Right, but it's not a lifestyle.
There's one other thought about this.
This whole business of driving 55 to save mileage and save gasoline and all that.
I bet your car is probably a little bit more efficient at 65 or 70 than it is at 55.
But beyond that, it's not going to save a significant amount because it doesn't need to be saved.
I ran out of time here.
I'm going to finish this thought before.
All right.
Let me see if I can make this point.
I normally communicate very well.
55 mile-an-hour speed limit.
The expressed purpose here is to save oil and to conserve gasoline and all that.
We do not have a shortage.
We don't have a shortage.
I don't care what anybody's telling you.
Whenever you go to the pump, it's there, is it not?
Okay, well, we don't have a shortage.
So cutting back to 55 is simply another gimmick, and it will bollocks everything up.
There's a reason that it was repealed.
It's an economic drag, for one thing, when you factor the time value of money.
But beyond all of that, here's the thing that I look at.
You know, they just redid the Pentagon, just redid the re-up on the tanker deal, and Boeing got it away from Airbus.
Now, this, you know what tankers are?
These are large, converted airliners that refuel military airplanes in the air during military operations and training exercises and so forth.
They're going to buy lots and lots of these tankers, and these tankers are going to hold a lot more jet fuel than just that necessary to propel themselves.
We read that the United Arab Emirates have ordered hundreds of jets into the future from Airbus and other places.
Now, airlines are, you know, they're parking airplanes, but they're going to have to replace some of these older with new ones with more efficient engines and so forth.
The bottom line, all of these plans being made down the line way into the future do not incorporate the notion that there will not be jet fuel.
Just the opposite.
You don't invest this kind of money that long down the road if you think there's going to be a problem with supply of jet fuel.
Now, you might be saying, yeah, well, even if there is Russia, the military will get first dibs on it.
Probably so.
But the consumer aircraft and airline industry is expanding and growing around the country in terms of, well, they're cutting back in the United States on domestic flights, but nobody's planning on a shortage of jet fuel or gasoline down the road.
All of this is smoke and mirrors from the environmentalists.
They're running out.
That's a finite supply.
We've got to go to alternative.
They're scaring you to death with this.
There's no reality to it whatsoever.
Airline manufacturers are announcing new models all the time.
Boeing's got the 787 Dreamliner coming out.
Corporate aircraft makers are constantly building new airplanes, bigger ones.
Gulfstream's coming out with the G650 in 2012.
Now, it's going to be more fuel efficient than anything they've got now by some, but it's bigger.
It's a wide body.
It's a much bigger airplane.
They're not figuring there's not going to be jet fuel, are they?
They're figuring going to be plenty of it.
And they took something like 600 orders for one the first day from around the world.
And the first plane's not going to roll off the assembly line until 2012, if they're on time.
You know, you wouldn't figure all this.
People aren't going to be buying these airplanes if they think there's not going to be any jet fuel, right?
And they're certainly not going to make them if there isn't going to be any jet fuel.
And yet the auto industry is doing what?
Trying to figure out ways to make lawnmowers into automobiles.
Now, a lot of that is due to the high price of gas and people don't want to pay a whole lot for it.
And that's the market working.
That's fine and dandy.
But this 55 mile an hour speed limit, it's just another area of control over people's lives that's going to really interrupt a lot of people's value of their time.
People that travel for business, the longer they spend on the road, the less time they're going to have to spend with whoever they're there to see or the less time they're going to have with their families or what have you.
In the airline business, flight in general, have you ever wondered why they never suggest, while we cut back to 55, have you never said, have you ever wondered why, well, if we can save gasoline and conserve, how come the airlines don't just throttle back to 350 miles an hour instead of five?
Well, let me give you one example.
Let's talk about an international flight.
It's a Boeing 747 or a jumbo somewhere.
And let's say it's going to go New York, that's 17-hour flights, Singapore, Indonesia somewhere.
They've got to carry for 17-hour, probably, I don't know how many flight crew, at least four pilots for crew change during the flight.
I don't know what the union rules are, but I figure that eight hours is it max, and then you get a new crew in there, and you want a new fresh crew in there on that flight for the landing.
I don't know how many flight attendants, you slow them down to where that flight takes X.
They might not be able to make it nonstop, depending on winds, and how many more crew are they going to have to put on board to handle slowing down?
And how much more fuel are they going to use?
You'd have to look at the drag coefficients to find out, you know, some of these things can't get up to where the air is really thin.
These heavies, you know, 37,000, 39,000 feet may be it for the, you know, a significant portion of flight until they burn off some fuel and get lighter.
Now, a corporate jet go up to 45, 47, 51,000 feet and do Mach 0.88 or whatever.
There's hardly very much less wind resistance.
But even at that, even at that, I asked some aviation experts.
It really is amazing to me.
Here we are, we're advancing technologically like nothing.
We've got a space shuttle, we've got little rovers up on Mars.
Why is it that we can't go faster than the speed of sound?
We're limited by the speed of sound domestically because people don't want to hear the booms.
And he said, no, no, no, no.
You don't understand flight is a series of compromises.
Weight, speed, altitude.
The faster you go at lower altitudes, the greater the wind resistance.
It's not just that the thrust propels you through, it's that the air gets thicker and it becomes heavier for you to get through.
So by the time you try to go from Mach 8.2 to 8.5 at certain altitude, it may be cost-prohibitive.
You may not gain that much speed based on the fuel that's going to be required to get you that additional speed because of the wind resistance.
And the same thing can happen at slower altitudes as well.
You can, or slower speeds, you can also increase the drag coefficient if you slow down.
So you may not even be really saving all that.
The point is, from an engineering standpoint, airplanes are designed to fly at the speeds and altitudes they fly at in terms of economics and safety.
You want a high altitude because you want thin air.
The thinner the air, the less fuel theoretically you use because it takes less thrust to get you through that air.
And the higher you can go, the better.
The Concorde flew at 60.
You could see the curvature of the earth.
But you couldn't turn on the afterburners until you got so far out to sea so that the booms only disturb the whales, you know, and screw them.
The only environmentalists heard about it.
But throttling back the airlines on the concept is going to save money.
It's going to do just the opposite.
It's going to increase crew costs because it's going to slow down people getting where they have to go.
It's going to make the aircraft inefficient.
What, Mr. Snerdley?
What's the question?
Well, the Concorde's not the most efficient because economic efficiency, it costs, by the time they shut the thing down, what was the first?
I think it was five or seven, might have been $7,500 one way.
I mean, to fly, that thing flew 2,000 miles an hour.
You go New York to London or Paris in three hours as opposed to seven or eight, depending on what city on the East Coast you're living.
I mean, that burned a lot of fuel.
When you were on a Concorde, and when you were coming in for a landing, they very rarely made the Concorde suffer delays or circle it because they didn't have the fuel to do it.
I mean, they were coming in, they had plenty of reserves and so forth.
They were not violating any of those regulations.
But, I mean, it took a lot, a lot of fuel to fly that thing that fast.
Four engines, or however they were configured, for, you know, you figure two of the three hours they're on afterburner at, you know, Mach 2 or whatever with 1,500 miles, whatever it was.
I forget, it just burns a lot of fuel.
So it gets to the point where it's cost prohibitive for a passenger or even cargo people, and they're not a rough room on one of those things to ship cargo.
Just after a while with fuel costs and the way they were maintaining those airplanes, they didn't make any new ones.
So we're sitting here, and the supersonic transport speeds now are, they're still on the drawing board, but they're on the drawing board, and there are people working on them.
Now, that has to also mean that the people doing that don't figure there's going to be a fuel source or fuel supply problem down the road.
What they're trying to do is make it affordable for people.
You couldn't fly the Concord coast to coast.
There's no advantage to it because you couldn't go supersonic because it just blow people's windows out with the sonic booms.
I happen to like sonic booms because I like aviation, but most people, nation of whiners, they started complaining to the cops about it and shut it down.
Okay, we're back.
Moscow Hills, Missouri.
And let's say this is Rich.
Nice to have you on the EIB network, sir.
Hello.
Hey, Rush, great to talk to you.
Love the show.
I want to address the statement that you sometimes make about do not doubt me.
Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.
Well, you had a caller today that wanted to, maybe a long story short, wanted to nationalize big oil to pay for Social Security.
The new oil that we're going to drill for, yeah.
Yeah, exactly.
Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.
Now, I'm sure there's listeners, and I was thinking of my daughter who teaches, you know, she's out of school right now, and, you know, she's indoctrinated.
And I'm thinking of all the young people out there that listen to you, and they probably doubt you.
You know, it takes six weeks, you say, to get up to speed.
And so when you say that the Democrats do not want to solve the oil problem, they probably think, you know, who is this guy saying such a ridiculous thing?
But these people thrive when there's problems because human nature, unfortunately, it seems to me, unless you have some conservative values, human nature says, look to government.
Now, this man that called you, that's exactly what he did.
I don't think he was a liberal, but his answer to the problem is to have government take it over.
No, just the opposite.
He was a conservative.
Well, that's even worse.
Well, that's why I accused him of being a selfish citizen.
Yes.
Well, I'm 64.
I've got more than Social Security coming in.
But, you know, if people don't realize that government is not the answer, it's the problem by now.
I was a Marine in 66 in Vietnam.
I saw the Democrats and what they did to that.
In the 70s, I saw Governor Reagan, and I almost fell off my couch.
I stopped watching news in 1970, national news.
I saw Governor Reagan on a tonight show.
I about fell off the couch because he said we should have went to Vietnam, but we should have gone to win.
Now, that was after everybody in this country assumed it was a mistake, and here was a politician from California saying something.
And believe me, I almost fell off the couch.
But that's the kind of man Reagan was.
If he'd have gone, he'd have won it.
So, you know, and then in 89, you came along, and I've been in advanced conservative studies ever since.
But it's amazing how people will fall for the Democrats.
My father, God love him, he was a Democrat until he was 91 and passed away.
But I couldn't say Reagan in front of him because he read the Post-Dispatch all his life.
Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, I know.
Our family read the Globe Democrat.
Well, yeah, until he went out of business.
Until he went out of business.
That's right.
Yeah, so now we've got just one.
Yeah, you know, we talk about this.
This is an item that puzzles a lot of people.
Why, with all the demonstrable failures of government trying to do this or that, all these vast expensive programs, all the little bureaucracies in cities and counties and states and so forth, why do people continue to turn to government?
And a lot of it's psychological.
You've got to remember the New Deal formed the basis for a lot of union and Democrat households to pass on the benevolence notion of government to their kids and grandkids and so forth, and people just grew up thinking it.
And there's another aspect to it, too, and I haven't given this a lot of thought, but most people's laments generally have to do with money and economics.
Yes.
And there's one place that's got an endless supply of money and is always giving it away, and that's government.
They're always giving it away to somebody.
Yep.
And they're always giving a lot of it away.
They're spending, what, $800 on toilet seats for military aircraft.
They are spending all kinds of money.
And when somebody from the government comes along and says, we can make sure that you don't get screwed by an insurance company, by a doctor, by a car dealer or whatever, people who think that they're powerless, think the government's everything but powerless.
And it's okay, fine, give it a shot.
And this is purely psychological because the facts on the ground clearly indicate that if you start depending on government for much of what you want or need in life, you're going to be perpetually poor and disappointed.
Well, maybe it goes to that point that a lot of people think that's unfortunately could be true, and that is it has to be so bad before it gets better.
Well, I think that's another psychological point of Democrats use.
If you go back to the Clinton campaign in 1992, worst economy in the last 50 years, which was a lie.
Well, I was thinking more of our oil situation.
You know, maybe now we'll start drilling now that it's $4.
You know, they got people when they go to fill up their cars.
I can't imagine what they're thinking.
I mean, I'm retired.
I know what they're thinking.
They're mad as hell.
This is such a golden opportunity for the Republicans.
This ought to be the Republicans' year.
The Democrat Party is the one standing in the way of anything being done about the price of gasoline coming down.
Now, there's a tipping point for everything.
We've learned what it is.
When it comes to gasoline, the tipping point is $4 a gallon.
That's when people say, I'm not going to adapt.
I've had it.
This is a sudden.
They start getting mad and they want action taken.
The Democrats, they're making noises here that they're going to open up to drilling and so forth, but they're just saying that to be able to occupy the position.
If a piece of legislation ever gets to Congress, House or the Senate, you watch the Democrats leader insert something in a bill or find something in the bill so that they can still have, hey, I'm for drilling, but we can't do it.
We've got to do it a smarter way or whatever.
Exactly.
You know, I think of that gas tank again, and, you know, we had snipers in Vietnam.
And I think of the average citizen in this country, you know, they're after our freedom, basically.
I mean, if you want to really generalize it in a big way.
And they've got them pinned down.
They've got them pinned down at the gas tape station.
You know, they're shooting at them.
They're taking away their freedom when they take away their ability to travel, to buy things.
And it is more hideous than that because all of that, this gasoline price is directly related to the man-made global warming hoax, which is the big vehicle for taking away liberty and freedom.
Unbelievable.
I mean, that one actually seeks to punish people.
If you walk around town in Moscow Mills, Missouri, go to the right place, you'll find enough liberals.
You may have to travel to St. Louis to do it, but you'll find enough liberals think, good, it's about time gas got this high.
We are destroying the planet.
You've got a bunch of just totally sycophant slave nerds, liberals, who believe that all this is good, that America deserves to pay this kind of punishing price, which is another problem that we've got.
And that mindset finds itself now as prominent in the Democrat Party.
Mark Stein will be here tomorrow, ladies and gentlemen, as I, El Rushbo, have some dental surgery done in the morning.
Be back here on Monday, revved up, ready to go.
▲
Export Selection