All Episodes
Previous Next
July 1, 2008 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:19
July 1, 2008, Tuesday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Yeah, I know, I know, I know.
I got the stacks mixed up here.
Hang on just a second.
Just about to get them unmixed up.
Uh, geez.
Anyway, greetings and welcome back, folks.
L. Rushboa, the Excellence in Broadcasting Network and the Limbaugh Institute for advanced conservative studies, a thrill and a delight to have you with us.
The telephone number if you want to be on the program is 800 282 2882, and the email address is Ill Rushball at EIB net.com.
Bob Dole has issued a statement on FaceTimation on Sunday.
General Clark called Republican presidential candidate John McCain untested and untried.
Claimed that McCain had no executive responsibility, belittled his leadership of a naval unit because it wasn't a wartime squadron, and stated, I don't think getting in a fighter plane and getting shot down is a qualification to become president.
The attack by General Clark on Senator McCain's war record and qualifications for the presidency is beyond comprehension.
Clark's absurd remarks signal further erosion in our nation's political discourse.
He should have stayed in bed Sunday morning.
It is unfortunate that a former general who ran for the presidency on his own war record thinks it's imbr inappropriate, uh thinks it that it is appropriate to attack a distinguished veteran and former prisoner of war in this way.
Senator McCain's entire life has been devoted to public service.
His achievement and experience constitute unparalleled qualification for America's highest office.
I love Senator Dole on this, but what does it say?
That the one fire brand in the Republican Party is Bob Dole, and it's two days after the fact.
But better late than never.
Audio soundbite time, Jim Webb last night on PMS NBC, jumping into this fray.
John McCain is my longtime friend.
If that is one area that I would ask him to calm down on, it's it's that.
Don't be standing up and uttering your political views and implying that all the people in the military support them, because they don't any more than when the Democrats had uh political issues during the Vietnam War.
Uh let's get the politics out of the military, take care of our military people, and have our political arguments in uh other areas.
Get politics out of the military.
John McCain needs to calm down.
This from a rookie senator, Jim Webb.
Needs to calm down and don't be standing up and offering your political views and implying that all people in the military support them.
This is again more smoke and mirrors.
None of this McCain has done.
But Webb gets up and says it.
The drive-by's report what he says, and that becomes the official record of what McCain says, i.e.
what Webb says that McCain is doing.
Who infused politics into this?
Who infused the military into it was Clark who claims, by the way, grab audio soundbite number four.
Here's Wesley Clark last night on MSNBC.
Uh, asked for his response to being criticized for his remarks.
I wasn't representing the Obama campaign in anything I said yesterday about John McCain.
I want to assure you, I would never, never diss someone's service.
When people choose to serve in uniform, I honor it.
I came home from Vietnam on a stretcher.
I was shot, I took a burst of AK, I got four rounds.
So I think I know a little bit about what it's like to honor men or women who serve in uniform.
And I do, and I would never dismiss somebody.
Uh Twilight's on time.
This is after he did dismiss somebody.
This is after he did diss somebody, specifically on the basis of their military service.
Claire McCaskill on uh MSNBC Live.
This is uh just today.
The uh infobabe asked her, General Clark is not backing down from those comments that were critical of Senator McCain.
What's what's the campaign's response to hearing that he's not stepping away from those comments?
Senator Obama has been very clear.
It is inappropriate in any campaign ever to devalue anyone's service to our country.
That's what they did to John Kerry four years ago.
He will not be a part of it.
This campaign will not be a part of it.
I think he respects The service of General Wesley Clark.
I think Senator Obama understands that General Clark is speaking from his own perspective.
But for this campaign, for the Obama campaign, it is never about devaluing someone's service to our country.
Patriotism is about serving your country and your community, and that's what Senator Obama wants this discussion to be about.
What does this remind you of?
Here we have two Obama supporters, Claire McCaskill from Missouri, a senator and Jim Webb, both recasting reality.
Obama, our campaign never said anything about why we would never do this, so we're not going to put up with this.
We would never ever do it.
Webb said McCain's going to calm down.
I wish McCain would act in a way just one day that somebody could legitimately say calm down and have it mean something.
This you the official Obama criticizer nailed this in his critique in the first hour of this program.
Barack Obama and his campaign, he is the first black Clinton.
He will not be the first black president because that's Clinton's.
But he is the first black Clinton.
That is exactly what's happening here.
Living in an alternative reality and knowing full well that the drive-bys are going to pro cover for you and make reality whatever it is you say in response to things.
So Clark gets a total pass.
Obama gets a total pass.
Obama gets treated as though he has rebuked what Clark has said when he hasn't, by ver and then Webb goes out and says the McCain's the one that needs to calm down.
Meanwhile, the only official response from some elected Republican has been Bob Dole.
This is from a column by Chris Satulo, Philadelphia Inquirer.
A not so glorious fourth U.S. atrocities are unworthy of our heritage.
Put the fireworks in storage.
Cancel a parade.
Tuck the soaring speeches in a drawer for another time.
This year, America doesn't deserve to celebrate its birthday.
This Fourth of July should be a day of quiet and atonement because we have sinned.
We have failed to pay attention.
We have settled for lame excuses.
We have spit on the memory of those who did that brave brave thing in Philadelphia 232 years ago.
The America those men founded should never torture a prisoner.
The America they founded should never imprison people for years without charge or hearing.
The America they founded should never ship prisoners to foreign lands, knowing their new jailers might torture them.
Such abuses once were committed by the arrogant crowns of Europe spawning rebellion.
Today, our nation does such things in the name of our safety.
Petrified, unwilling to take the risks that love of liberty demands, we close our eyes.
We have done such things on orders from the Oval Office.
We have done them without general outrage or shame.
Abu Ghrab, Guantanamo, CIA secret prisons, rendition of prisoners to foreign torture chambers.
It's not enough that we had good reason to be scared.
The men huddled long ago in Philadelphia had better reason.
A British fleet floated off the Jersey coast full of hands, eager to hang them from the nearest lamp posts.
Yet they pledged their lives in sacred honor, no idle vow, to defend the inalienable rights of men, inalienable what what does that signify?
It means rights that belong to each person simply by virtue of being human.
Rights that can never be taken away, no matter what evil a person might do or might intend.
Surely one of those is the right not to be tortured.
Surely that is a piece of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
This is the creed of July 4th.
No matter what it costs us, no matter how it scares us, no matter how foolish it seems to a cynical world, America should stand up for human rights.
No, not even the brave men who picked up a quill, dipped it in ink, and signed the parchment that summer day in Philadelphia lived up perfectly to the creed, but they did something extraordinary, founding a new nation upon a vow to oppose all the evil habits of tyranny.
That's why history still honors them.
But what will history think of us?
Of how we responded to our great challenge.
September 11th was a hideous evil, a grievous wound, yet, truth told, it has not summoned our better angels as often as it has summoned our worst.
We have betrayed the July 4 Creed.
We trample the vows we make hand to heart.
Don't imagine that only the torturer's hand bears the guilt.
The guilt reaches deep inside our capital and beyond that to all of us.
Our silence is complicit.
In our name, innocents were jailed, humans were tortured, our constitution mangled, and we said so little.
We can't claim not to have known the best among us.
Raise the alarm.
Heroes in uniform, judges in robes.
They oppose the perverse logic of an administration drenched in fear and drunk on power.
But did we need them?
Hardly.
Barely.
We were so busy, soccer practice at six, a credit card balance to fret the final vote on idol.
We left it to those in power to keep our precious selves from harm, whatever it took.
We took the coward's way.
The world sees this, even if we are too dim to grasp it.
We've lost respect.
We've shamed the memory of Jefferson, Adams, and Franklin.
And all for a scam.
The water boarding, the snarling dogs, the theft of sleep, all the diabolical tricks haven't made us safer.
They have may have averted this plot or that, but they've spawned new enemies by the thousands, made the jihadist ranch ring true to so many ears.
They have made the jihadist rants ring true to so many ears, meaning more and more people in the world hate our guts.
And believe the jihadists.
So put out no flags and sing no patriotic hymns.
We deserve no fourth this year.
Let us atone in quiet and humility.
Let us spend the day truly studying the example of our founders.
May we earn a new birth of courage before our nation's birthday next rolls around.
This is the Philadelphia 'cause Snerdley wants to know why I'm torturing you all with this.
I'll explain in a minute.
This is Chris Satulo from the Philadelphia Inquirer.
He's a he's a columnist.
The reason that I would torture you with this is it is evidence of that which I have been saying for many, many years now that there is a growing population in this country that hates this country, that dislikes this country.
They're all in the left side of the aisle.
They're all leftists to one degree or another.
And these are the people who are going to vote for Obama.
And they're going to vote for Obama because they think Obama agrees with them that we've been mean and that we've been stealing the world's resources.
This is not just about torture.
We're destroying the planet with global warming.
Our SUVs are doing damage on toll.
Our desire for more and more is selfish, and it's keeping the rest of the world poor.
I'm just telling you, there's a cadre of movement of people in this country who genuinely detest this country and do not like it, and they fall back on excuses such as we have let down the founding fathers.
So I just find examples of these things, and rather than tell you that these people are out there, I let you hear what they think in their own words.
In the meantime, a brief timeout will come back, more phone calls and lots of other stuff still to go here on the EIB network.
Hang tough.
And we are back.
Great to have you, Rush Limbaugh, the EIB network.
Here's Harry Reed, by the way, dingy Harry, who was on the Fox Business Network yesterday afternoon.
Liz Clayman talked to him.
And she said, Tell me your perspective on this plant and why you're supportive of it at a time when Congress is having trouble passing the housing bill, because we have the energy credits attached to it, and some senators don't want that.
We talk about cost competitiveness, but the one thing we fail to talk about is those costs that you don't see on the bottom line.
That is coal makes us sick.
Oil makes us sick.
It's global warming.
It's ruining our country.
It's ruining our world.
We've got to stop using fossil fuel.
We have for generations taken it out of the earth, carbon out of the earth, And put it in the atmosphere, and it's making us all sick.
It's changing our world.
These people are losing it.
Oil and coal are making us sick.
Oil and coal built the country.
Oil and coal sustain the casinos and the hotels in his home state.
But the point of all this is not the specifics of what he says.
It is time people woke up and understood just where the Democrat Party is and what their future of America is.
And folks, it is filled with pain.
There is nothing but a constant state of decline.
We are the greatest sinners.
I don't care if it's this columnist in Philadelphia, who's talking about torture and his imagined bloated number of examples all over the world, and the world hates us because of this, or whether it's Harry Reed or any other Democrat suggesting that we've got to stop using oil because we're destroying the planet, the Democrat Party has now become a full-fledged member of the far left.
And the far left of the Democrat Party believe in one thing: America's guilt.
The guilt that has been born of prosperity and growth.
And by God, Harry Reed, Democrat Party, and willing accomplices of the drive-by media are not going to rest until we get cut down to size and pay the price for our sins.
I sit here and marvel when I read this piece in Philadelphia Inquirer or listen to Harry Reed, and I say to myself, how in the world can a majority of Americans want to vote for people with this view of their own country.
Surely, ladies and gentlemen, we are not populated by a majority of voters who think their own country sucks.
Surely we are not populated with a majority of voters who believe that the United States of America is the focus of evil in the world.
Surely we do not have a majority of voters in this country who believe that the United States must be cut down to size, that we must be harmed, and that we must do it to ourselves.
Certainly we do not have a majority of Americans.
Voting Americans who believe that this country deserves not to exist as it does.
Certainly that can't be true.
And yet, look at the number of votes these people are going to get.
I don't know if it's going to be enough electoral votes to win.
Nobody does.
I don't know what the popular votes are going to be.
But believe me, there's no difference in Harry Reid and Barack Obama.
And they don't have any mavericks in their Democrat Party.
What they have is a bloodthirst.
A bloodthirst for power.
And they will do anything, including deceive in order to get it.
When Obama does a flip-flop on faith-based initiatives as he has done.
For example, the news story here from the Associated Press reaching out to evangelical voters.
Barack Obama is announcing plans that would expand President Bush's program, steering federal social service dollars to religious groups and in a move sure to cause controversy, support their ability to hire and fire based on faith.
Now, does anybody really believe that the Democrat Party supports this?
Do you think the Democrat Party actually wants to import evangelical voters and have evangelical voters' policies enacted as part of the Democrat platform?
Don't believe that for a minute.
Yet here's Obama saying it.
What they're hoping is that the evangelical community will fall for it.
He is, after all, shrouded in heavenly light.
An angelic messianic countenance and persona.
I know I know there are liberal churches that benefit from this like Trinity, but Obama's support for letting religious charities that receive federal funding consider religion in employment decisions.
Says here is likely to invite a storm of protest from those who view such faith requirements as discrimination.
Now, what this tells me is that my question certainly there cannot be a majority of American voters.
Who will elect to power people who want to destroy this country as we know it?
Surely that can't be.
And I think this is evidence that it is not true.
They know they have to move to the center.
They know that they cannot be who they are and win elections.
And yet here's Harry Reed.
Oil makes us sick, coal makes us sick, we're destroying the earth, global warming, we have to leave it in the ground.
The economic consequences of that are too dire to even contemplate.
Yet he says he's for it.
You know, this really is, it really is cynical.
Now watch how all the liberals who opposed George W. Bush on faith-based initiatives will quickly line up behind Obama.
You watch, you just you just watch.
The fact is he has never shown support for this before.
Never.
It's also just it's just another reason for him to expand government.
That's that's the key to this.
Obama is a leftist with a strategy, and that includes convincing evangelicals that he is their friend.
He didn't take this stance when fighting for the Democrat nomination.
No, now they say he's tacking to the center, which is what all candidates do after they win the primary.
He's not moving anywhere, folks.
He is deceiving.
Pure and simple.
If Obama and the Democrats can use faith-based initiatives as a way to win office, he will.
It's that simple.
And if he can use it as a way to grow government, he will.
It's that simple.
I have said this before, and it bears repeating, because I think it's well worth your while to remember this.
The left is about power.
And they are willing to say whatever they must or do whatever they must to gain it.
That is how all of Obama's comments and proposals must be examined.
They are not legitimate, they are not genuine, they are not sincere.
They are deceptive.
They are calculated.
Some of them are diabolical.
They are in they are designed to win, pure and simple.
This is a classic, classic illustration, ladies and gentlemen, of how liberalism works.
It's right in front of our eyes, except now.
Never before in my vast and wide-arrayed career of broadcast exceptionalism.
Never before has the Democrat Party, the leftists always have, but never before has the Democrat Party endorsed the notion that this country is deeply flawed because of our own people and our own structure.
Never before has the mainstream media gone so far in echoing those sentiments by the Democrat Party that this is an unjust and immoral country.
That is what's new.
What is new is that they intend to punish the population of this country, the American people, for having created these sins.
And among these sins, by the way, is the election of George W. Bush.
Because if you had not elected George W. Bush, then there wouldn't have been any torture, and there wouldn't have been any waterboarding, and liberals would not have been embarrassed.
And by the way, has this notion of torture frankly been established and proven as something commonplace, as something that even happened frequently.
You notice how people just buy into this.
We tortured.
It's routine.
It's the way of the Bush administration, and it's the way America has become.
All those lying stories about flushing Korans down toilets turned out not to be true.
And who is it that we're talking about here?
Who is it that we're talking about?
We're talking about a bunch of backwards seventh century fanatics who would do it again and again and again.
We're up against a bunch of fruit cakes who are willing to die to accomplish their mission.
I mean, they consider that part of the mission.
I think that most of these leftists who write these hand-wringing pieces about what a rotten place we are, about what a rotten country we are.
I don't think they have the slightest notion the danger that we face.
I don't think they have the slightest understanding of the risks that uh associate themselves with the world's lone superpower.
I don't think they have the slightest understanding, even after 9-11, even after the US coal, after all these, I don't think they have the slightest understanding of what the enemies of this country intend for us.
And to those who do understand it, they are more likely than not to agree with our enemies.
That we deserve it.
As Harry Reed thinks we deserve.
Yeah, we're destroying the planet with global warming.
Coal makes us sick, oil makes us sick.
Here's uh Madam X, Madame X in Worcester, Massachusetts, as we go back to the phones.
Great to have you with us on the EIB network.
Hi.
Russ, it's great to talk with you.
God bless ya.
Thank you.
Well, if you're uh you're in your opening monologue, you were talking about uh boy girl baby showers and and mixed gender wedding uh party attendance and all that.
Well uh I have two family members, God bless them, that did exactly that.
And uh the the the first one was the mixed gender wedding party and my daughter, the beautiful Now wait a second.
Wait, what what is let's can we speak English here?
Oh what is a mixed gender wedding party?
Oh well the the um the groom had a best babe uh instead of a best man.
And and she had oh oh I but when you said party, I thought you meant like a pre-wedding bash.
No, no, no, no.
You had a mixed gender ceremony.
Yes.
And the groom had a best babe.
That's right.
Oh, we're in trouble.
Oh, yeah.
Yeah, yeah.
But she she wasn't dressed differently.
Let me tell you something.
If I were gonna get God strike me dead, if I were gonna get married again, and I told the lucky woman that my best man was gonna be a woman.
I I if I just I can't imagine.
I can't imagine it going over with a lot of happiness.
Oh, yeah, great idea.
Let's drink to it.
Well, see, my my daughter, the she's beautiful and intelligent, but she is a victim of a very, very liberal education.
And and uh when this metrosexual came along and wanted to marry her, she just thought it was great.
Right, because she could run the guy.
Um not really.
No, it's more the other way around, truly.
Oh.
I never knew a metrosexual ran anybody.
Uh yeah, this one does, yeah.
Yeah.
Yeah, he um he holds his wine glass by the base.
The base not the stem or the bowl, but the base.
Oh, well, isn't that just peachy?
Oh, yeah, yeah.
And um he he's kind of femme, actually.
He's what?
Femme.
Kind of femme.
Uh-huh.
Like an effeminate.
Yeah.
And your daughter fell for the guy.
I don't get it.
I just don't get it.
Did you say anything to her about it?
Uh not directly.
Not directly.
But she is he has a bunch of things.
Well, if you didn't say anything indirectly, how did you say it?
And and to whom.
Well, I talked to my husband, and um he talked to them.
And he talked to her.
Yeah, and a lot of good that did because they're now married, right?
That's right.
Are they happily married?
Um apparently so.
What do you mean apparently so?
They either are or they aren't.
You should be able to tell this.
You're a parent.
Well, see, the that's the thing, Rush, is that it's all so confusing to me.
I think.
And you think the mixed gender wedding led to this?
Uh oh well, no, no.
I I I think that whatever is up with with him and the liberalism in this state led up to the formation of these two and the meeting of these two and and the okay for this this mixed gender wedding attendance thing.
Yeah, I know.
Well, it is what it is.
Traditions die hard.
Uh and and th this is you know, th these are is uh there's there's a lot more than just this uh part of our culture that's uh that's that's under assault.
Uh in and you know you know what those things are.
Anyway, I look at I appreciate they call Madame X. Madame X. She called here before, Snurley.
She long time ago.
I thought of Madame X was familiar.
A brief time out, windfall profits time here at the EIB network back after this.
You know, I imagine a number of you people when I said that the left is gonna go right along with Obama on the faith-based initiative flip flop, I can imagine you're shaking your heads and no, they're not these people to f you wait, folks.
Trust me, do not doubt me.
They will come up with a convoluted pretzel type position here to take that will allow the left to acknowledge Barack's flip-flop on this cause they know at the end of the day, it's all smoke and mirrors.
Uh Kook fringe left may have some things to say about people that Hoff poll in this these sort of places, but what these they're they're coordinated, they're gonna handle this the right way, they're gonna let him get away with these things.
They are not gonna take down their own candidate.
It's just that simple, other than those angry Clinton women who are still fit to be tied out there, and don't discount what they might do.
Here's uh Wayne in Prescott, Michigan.
Nice to have you on the program, sir.
Well, uh I'm uh one month early, but congratulations on twenty years of excellence in broadcast.
Thank you, sir.
Thank you very much.
I appreciate that.
Uh I have dittoed everything you've said except for one thing you said yesterday.
What's that?
Uh about McCain's reaction.
Yeah.
I believe that he might have been more or less biting his lip and trying to keep his composure.
And I think that this is what they're trying to do is get him to fly off the handle.
Well, let's uh let's listen to it again.
We happen to have McCain's reaction.
You can listen to me or or listen to it with me here, Wayne.
Yes.
Uh, you want to you want to do that?
Yes, sir.
Yeah, and then you can you tell me if you still have your same opinion.
I think that that kind of thing is unnecessary.
I'm proud of my record of service, and I have plenty of friends and leaders who will attest to that.
But the important thing is, and if that's the kind of campaign that Senator Obama and his surrogates and his uh supporters want to gauge uh I understand that.
But it doesn't reduce the price of a gallon of gas by one penny.
It doesn't achieve our energy independence any make it come any closer.
It doesn't help an American stay in their home who are in risk of losing it today.
And it certainly doesn't do anything to address the challenges that Americans have in keeping their jobs, their homes, and supporting their families.
So you think that was McCain biting his lip.
I uh I hate it sounds terrible the way he says it, but I do think that he was trying to bite his lip.
I hope he was.
Let's put it that way, I guess.
I don't support him uh wholeheartedly like I would to other candidates, but uh he's the best that's out there.
Well, yeah, I yeah, that's uh this is up and down on a bum.
Well, you can't afford Obama, is this in any number of ways.
Can't afford him financially, can't afford him for in policy.
We cannot afford Obama.
We can't afford him in charge of the Supreme Court and the federal judiciary.
Sorry.
Thank you.
Uh, Any any number of ways.
I just did I listen to this uh response, and his qualifications have been assaulted and attacked, and his his uh uh service as a prisoner of war has been deemed uh to be meaningless.
His uh flying fighter jets over Hanoi and world in the uh in the uh Vietnam War have been stated here as irrelevant and meaningless.
And I just I I don't know, I I I think I know when McCain bites his lower lip, but he's biting his lower lip, he's mad, and I've seen him when he's mad.
He wasn't mad yesterday.
Well I think what he's rather doing is trying to stay above the fray of all this.
I think he's you may be right that he's trying to avoid getting sucked into their level down there and and you know, sucked into the west the level of Wesley Clark, who is a is a is a nobody.
Uh and perhaps if it had been Obama who had said this, that perhaps McCain would have had a more forceful response.
But I don't think he was biting his lower lip.
Oh, okay.
Uh I will agree that way.
He wasn't biting his lower lip, but he's keeping himself above above the fray.
And uh uh it's hard on him.
I that's gotta be extremely hard.
Well, of course it is, but George W. Bush has tried the same thing.
He's tried to stay above the fray.
He one of the reasons he does not respond to his critics is because he thinks that it demeans the office of the of the presidency.
He thinks he's above it.
Politics is politics, and people are going to say dastardly mean diabolical things about any president, and you just get you can't, you got a job to do, and all that stuff that people say doesn't matter.
But the job of president also takes place within the realm of politics.
And that means you have to get elected to it and you have to get re-elected to it.
That means your leaders or your your voters have to feel like they're being led that somebody's out there leading them somewhere, standing up for what they believe in.
And if you're going to continually get ripped to shreds in a political sense like this and not fire back at it, I mean the time is right, and there are wrong times to do it, wrong people to react to.
It might have been better for McCain not to react to Wesley Clark.
I mean, Wesley Clark is uh non-entity and a non factor.
But the fact of the matter is he is, whether he says it or not.
This is this is a nobody will convince me otherwise.
A coordinated effort from the McCain from the Obama campaign.
You have Clark on Sunday reiterating his uh thoughts yesterday and today.
You have Rand Beers, somehow noted foreign policy expert, worked for Kerry in 2004, uh, coming along and seconding the impression and the notion uh left by uh by by Wesley Clark.
They're trying to do more than take McCain off his game.
They're trying to do far more than that.
They know they've got a wuss as a candidate compared to McCain.
In terms of experience, military experience, understanding aspects of national security, they know Obama's a wuss.
They know they can't build Obama up into something he's not.
They can't make us believe that Barack Obama was at D-Day.
They can't make us believe that Barack Obama was anywhere near Vietnam.
They can't make us aware that Barack Obama's even been a recruitment center.
So what they have to do is tear down McCain in that area and make it sound like he's nothing.
Then it's no big deal, and that's why you're gonna see more and more people citing the fact that he did a propaganda video while he's being tortured.
And that he uh might have ended up saying traitorous things to save his life.
They're gonna do everything they can to destroy that aspect of McCain's service and of his life, because their own candidate can't compare to it in any way.
So rather than compare and fall short, you tear down what your opponent is.
And at some point, if you're in the process of being torn down, you have to make sure you take steps that that doesn't happen.
I appreciate the call.
Nevertheless, Wayne, this is Jeff in uh in Albuquerque.
Great to have you here, sir.
Welcome to the EIB network.
It's really great to speak with you right.
Thank you, sir, very much.
Well, if I could also point out real quickly to some of your uh listeners that Albuquerque is north of truth or consequences of New Mexico.
So happy to know that.
Well, you know, I just don't know what General uh Wesley Clark is thinking.
Uh John McCain, you know, flew for twenty-three missions in Vietnam.
He's 22 in one, he was shot down in one of those missions.
He was head of one of the largest squadrons in the Navy.
He has twenty years of experience in the military, over twenty years of experience in the Senate.
Three of his sons serve or have served in the military.
And what type of resume or survey.
What do you mean you don't know what he's thinking?
I don't.
I just it doesn't make sense.
I mean, it makes total sense.
In the first place is a liberal.
Liberals are diabolically mean spirited people.
Number two, he's part of the Obama campaign.
He wants some kind of job in the Obama presidency or administration.
He is doing what liberals do.
He is destroying, it's no different than taking a Robert Bork if you're Ted Kennedy.
It's no different than what they try to do to judicial nominees of the Senate Judiciary Committee, the Liberal Democrats, liberals or liberals.
They destroy their opponents.
They try to destroy their character and their lives and their reputations because they can't compete.
Wesley Clark couldn't hold John McCain's coffee cup.
I don't know where the time's going.
I mean, we're already at the end of the second excursion, second hour of our excursion today.
Only one more to go.
We'll get to it before you know it.
Sit tight.
▲
Export Selection