All Episodes
Previous Next
June 26, 2008 - Rush Limbaugh Program
35:10
June 26, 2008, Thursday, Hour #3
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Where did I tell you we were in the soundvice number 10?
Yeah, good.
Okay, greetings and welcome back.
Rush Limbaugh, having more fun than a human being should be allowed to have.
Executing assigned host duties flawlessly.
Zero mistakes.
Today's program, another illustration of a brilliantly conceived and flawlessly executed excursion into broadcast excellence.
Nice to have you on the program.
Television is uh telephone numbers 800-282-2882.
The email address is Lrushbo at EIBNet.com.
A reminder, Brian, is it 420 this afternoon?
Melanie Morgan and Michelle Malkin have organized this massive telethon that's happening on the uh internet today at their website, move AmericaForward.org, and they've got all kinds of people involved here in the effort.
The purpose is to raise funds.
I think their goal is like $500,000.
They want what they want to do is put together the largest care package ever to be sent to the armed forces in Iraq and Afghanistan.
And they're doing this on the internet with uh uh Jerry Lewis style telethon.
And we will be appearing at uh 4.20 Eastern time, just a little over uh a couple hours from now for 20 minutes via the ditto cam.
And we'll be I'm gonna be talking about some of my experiences in Afghanistan when I went there and the general overall impression that we all have of the uh of the U.S. military, so I wanted to remind you of that.
It's at MoveAmerica Forward.org.
Uh, and that that website will take you to wherever you need to go to uh link up with the telethon as it's happening.
Friend of mine in Kansas City has sent me a note about today's Supreme Court decision affirming the Second Amendment.
He says, Rush, have you checked something?
Who were the founders thinking about when they wrote the Second Amendment?
Check the Third Amendment.
And here's part of the Third Amendment.
No soldier shall in time of peace be quartered in any house without the consent of the owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.
Now, when the Constitution was written, it appears if you look at the Third Amendment, what the founders are worried about was government.
Not so much rapists and murderers and burglars and so forth.
The people were given the right to own weapons, bear arms, and armed government agents, i.e.
soldiers, were told to stay out.
Soldiers were supposed to have their own digs.
Our homes are sacred.
We have the right to defend ourselves even from our own government.
This is an interesting point to keep in mind.
The mindset of the founding fathers, uh, their fear of a tyrannical government, and the uh constitution written in such a way as to limit government.
But don't forget uh Justice Scalia in defining his uh interpretation of original intent.
Look, I'm I'm not trying to find out what the founders thought, because I can't ask them.
But I am trying to, I'm trying to maintain the original intent of the Constitution as they wrote it.
And it is an important distinction.
Anyway, just to re-establish here, we came dangerously close today to having the Second Amendment wiped out.
Four liberal justices on the U.S. Supreme Court essentially voted to throw the Second Amendment out.
Now you can say that the case was about the DC gun ban, and of course it was that was the vehicle for the liberals on the court, but had they found for the D.C. gun ban, they would have been saying that the Second Amendment's no longer valid.
So basically what had to happen here today was forces had to be marshaled to defend and protect the Constitution against four people who had sworn an oath to defend and protect the Constitution.
The third branch of government, The judicial branch, at the highest level of that branch, four liberal judges who in their oath swear to defend and protect the Constitution, voted to get rid of some of it.
Dangerously, dangerously close.
World is effeminate thanks to men's fashion, says President's daughter.
The influential daughter of Kazakhstan's president said that the world gotcha, didn't I?
You thought, which bush kid is this?
The influential daughter of the president of Kazakhstan said the world has become increasingly effeminate because of men's new interest in fashion and beauty.
And of course, some of you might be saying, well, she's got a point listening to some guy on the radio trying to find Gardenia candles all the time.
Dariga Nazarbayev, 45, told a women's congress, men are now paying more attention to themselves and to fashion.
They've started going to beauty parlors and hair salons a lot more often.
They've started doing manicure.
Looking at the appearance of contemporary young men, one may notice how much their notions of masculinity have changed, how this masculinity is sometimes being replaced by femininity.
But she added to the 400 women and the 10 or so men at the conference, one cannot help but notice that the world of men has become increasingly effeminate.
I don't know if we can see this as our gender's victory.
Snurdly, you are a noted sexist.
What is your reaction to the when you when you hear the president.
I mean I the thing that surprises me most about this is that men in Kazakhstan are getting manicures.
I mean that they're going to beauty parlors.
I didn't know they had beauty parlors for women in Kazakhstan, much less for men.
Well, anyway, Snerdly Snerdly snurdly is not uh Snerdley's not answering.
Let me let me let me let me approach this uh in the following manner.
I I know some guys, which is a very healthy trait for me to have.
I know some guys who are very, very worried about the percentage breakdown of female students and male students at institutions of higher learning.
University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, the ratio 65 female, 35 male.
Well, in the in one sense.
They're shouting in my ear, what's wrong with that?
Well, in the old days, there would have been nothing wrong with that.
That would have been two women for every guy.
Cool.
But when you look at why this ratio has happened, why are so few men going to college?
It's because they don't want to hang around a bunch of feminist women.
And the ones that do go to college and do hang around are the ones that are hanging around feminist women and being feminized and emasculated.
These are not good old American boys that are hanging around in college anymore.
It's not, it's that's not the makeup of who these people are.
I've been, I haven't shared these stories because you know we don't do a lot of relationship talk on this program because you know, I've I've I've reached a level of expertise there that it no longer interests me.
However, I've had stories in the stack of stuff today about how depressed women are.
There have been countless stories.
I bet you in the last ten days have been two or three stories on the overall increased level of depression, clinical depression, among women in America.
It clinically, yes, snurdly, it's new.
Don't see, he's he's he's he's you could write the book on sexism.
He's in there saying, women depressed, boy, what's new about that?
I'm telling you, clinically depressed, and there's a reason for it, and that's because real men are in short supply.
And real men are under assault as brutes, predators.
You know, the uh the feminists' version of a real man is a jelly-spined, linguini spined flexible, manipulable character who jumps and shouts at the very command that a woman makes.
So no real men measure up to these babes.
But that means you've got on the average college camp high when you have this kind of a ratio, and and you know it's not just UNC Chapel Hill.
I mean, there's a lot of colleges where there are vast, vastly many more female students than male.
What what's what are these feminized young men doing with their lives?
These guys that stay in these institutions where they're vastly outnumbered by a bunch of feminized women who are trying to come become men.
That's what feminism is where it went wrong.
It's all women you're gonna be worried men.
And I think, I think what's happening is that most of it's been going on a long time feminism femin feminism, don't just shouting at me, feminism is dying.
Certain elements of feminism are dying, the radical glory Steinum burn the broth.
But that but feminism is not dying in the sense that men are predators, that men don't get their kids in a divorce, all these that it's it's not dying.
Uh the there are there's a legacy here, even though the the ancient fossilized founders of the movement may have passed on.
Uh well, not literally passed on, but they're past their prime.
They were when they started, which was old problem in the first place.
But nevertheless, uh there's a legacy that still impacts people.
I think what happens is feminized boys.
You know, I've often said who do who do liberals consider real men?
Michael Kensley.
Alan Alda.
Uh the guy that played Frank Burns, the character Frank Burns on MASH.
You know, who was coming, look how long ago that was.
And this guy was practically a pet on a leash for hot lips hoolahan.
And I think they've become Democrats.
Some Republicans too, but I think they've run for office and they have become Democrats.
Tom Dashel, Harry Reed, soft spoken, concerned about everything.
They're little wusses, and they're constantly voicing their concern over every little thing that fits their template into a Democrat America.
Grow a pair.
Onions, as you say.
Any man with onions, as you say, is voted off the island these days since he doesn't fit the feminist chicken template and agenda.
And so what we're left with is a collection of snivelling, whining Frank Burns type guys.
You know, who hot lips hoolahan was running around on a leash.
And they're running around, and guess these are the people apologizing to the world for America.
These are the people seeking the approval.
The Richard Holbrooks of the world.
These are the people that run around Europe and the Middle East, please like us.
Please like what have we done to make you hate us and please like it?
What?
Well, you might you might you might put Obama, the cool cat, the country club with the cigarette and the martini pass and judge on everybody at Carl Rove said he's a little feminized.
He's a little feminized.
I'd have to I'd have to give you that point.
Uh let me ask you this.
They put it out there bluntly.
As playing off this line by the daughter of the president of Kakhstan.
Kazakhstan, do we have any men running for president?
We have any real men running for president.
Do we?
Right, right.
You just said it.
You fell into the trap.
Yes, we do have a real man.
He was a real man.
But now he's, you know, he panders.
He does his share of feminized things.
That's you're right, Limbo, but I'm just fooling him.
We're gonna have green government.
Yes.
Uh it's trying to curry favor with the feminized elements, there's no question.
So the feminists thus far have won the battle.
We are uh we're we're a nation that's become feminized, and we are we are you know whatever we have to do to acknowledge that aspect of behavioral modification in order to seek approval from people and so forth.
So the daughter of the president of what Kazakhstan, pardon me, if I'm really more professional than that, to stutter over that, may have a point.
Okay, back to the phones we go.
And this is uh Doug in Toronto, Canada.
Doug, it's great to have you here.
And welcome, sir.
Hey, Rush, it's actually Mike.
Uh it's my are you in Toronto?
Yes, I'm in Toronto, yes.
Okay, cool.
Well, I'm sorry about this.
My mistake.
Nah no problem.
Um here.
Here in Canada, we don't have a constitutional right to hold guns.
But what we do have here, especially in Toronto, is a high gun crime rate.
Uh something like a hundred murders a year here in the city of Toronto.
Let me ask you a question.
Are the gun crimes committed in Toronto uh uh committed by law-abiding citizens?
No, not what not none whatsoever.
Well, that was a facetious question.
Yeah, I figured that much.
But um, and one of one of the common things we hear from our socialist mayor here is um because of the Americans in your right to bear guns, we have an inflow of guns coming to Toronto from the states.
And there's a lot of stuff out there, like there's a motion.
Wait, wait, wait, now because of our second amendment, the right to keep and bear arms, you have guns flowing into Canada from America.
Yes, this this is like the the criminal aspect.
Uh the legal gun owners in the states, they lose their their guns to home invasions, and those guns then get transferred here to Canada for um we trade uh drugs for guns.
Oh, I see.
So our criminals are kind of stashing their stuff up there and exchanging it for other criminal goods.
Yes.
And that means your criminals up there are getting our criminals' guns.
Yes.
That's what you're that's what your liberals are telling you.
That's exactly what they're telling us.
That's that's just one of the things.
I mean, there's a motion here in our city council where they want to ban shooting ranges and gun clubs to stop gun crimes.
They want to what?
They want to st ban shooting ranges and gun clubs to stop gun crimes?
Yes, that's it's on it's on top of the city.
Well, there you go.
What kind of crime happens at a shooting range or a gun club?
That's my whole question there.
I I couldn't tell you.
And it's just liberalism, right?
That's attack the good guys and not the bad guys.
By the way, how's your health care system working up there?
Oh, it's it's horrible.
That's another thing.
And you know, we have thousands of Canadian Canadians a year that go to the States to see the city.
Yeah, so we while we're sending you our criminals guns.
You people are coming south of the border to get well.
Exactly, yes.
Well, this is this is amazing you guys, I know a lot of Canada is just is just overrun uh with liberalism.
In fact, I the reason I asked you about the health care story is I've got a story here from uh Investors Business Daily.
Yeah.
Uh great newspaper here in the States.
Canadian health care, we so envy lies in ruins.
Its architect admits, uh, as this presidential campaign continues, the candidates' comments about health care will continue to include stories of their own experiences and anecdotes of people across the country.
The uninsured woman in Ohio, the diabetic in Detroit, the overworked doctor in Orlando to name a few, but no one will mention Claude Castungway.
Am I pronouncing that right?
C-A-S-T-O-N-G-U-A-Y.
How would you pronounce that as a Canadian?
I've not heard of the guy.
I wouldn't be able to tell you.
Claude Castongway.
Well, what is he he's perhaps not surprising because this statement isn't an American, or statesman isn't an American, and hasn't held office in over three decades.
Castangue's evolving view of Canadian health care, however, should weigh heavily on how the candidates think about the issue in the country.
Anyway, he says it is falling apart.
The Canadian health care system is not at all what it was envisioned when he started it.
It has been bastardized.
It cannot continue to function as it is currently constituted.
Uh it is effectively in ruins.
And you know what's frustrating is liberals look to that and to break Britain, which is in largely the same circumstance.
Our politicians do, and they want to import it.
They want to say this, it's a safe with liberalism everywhere, Mike.
I don't liberalism, socialism, wherever it's been tried, the result has been mass misery, mass failure.
And yet they seek to emulate it because they don't care about that.
They care about the power being in charge of all this failure.
It gives them thanks much for the call.
Welcome back.
Rush Linboy, your guiding light through times of trouble, confusion, murkiness, tumult, chaos, distortion, torture, humiliation, annihilation, and even the good times.
I am a man with whom you could and would totally trust your wife, your daughter, your kids, your pets.
Overnight in a motel six while you're out of town on business.
And I know I'm not feminized.
No way am I feminine.
Why do you think I'm so hated by the feminists?
Because I am not feminine.
Let me ask you this.
Feminists don't like scented candles.
You're right.
I love Gardenia, sir.
They don't like scented candles.
Too feminine.
Don't mistake femininity and feminism, Snertley.
You know better than that.
Let me ask you, who would you between these two?
Who's the real man?
Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid.
Between Harry Reed and Hillary Clinton, who's the real man?
No question, it's Hillary.
So the president of Kazakhstan's daughter has a point.
The world's becoming feminized.
Because too effeminate.
Guys running around getting manicures, going to beauty salons.
Bad news for charities out there.
This is the French news agency.
Trains are bustling.
Scooter sales are booming.
Manual lawnmowers are back in vogue, but charities are grimly facing up to a drop in volunteer workers, while some cash strapped families are cutting expenditures on fresh meat and vegetables.
And don't forget, folks, don't forget the tragic news.
The the I mentioned this earlier in the program.
One of the surest signs that our economy is actually not doing well at all.
I know they're showing 1% economic growth in the past in the past reporting period.
And I know that home sales are up.
But when you when you learn that Americans are only going to increase spending on their pets by 5%, up to 43.6 billion dollars this year, then you know America's hurting.
Forty-one billion dollars and some change on our pets last year, only 43 billion this year, only a 5% increase.
The way Washington works, that's a cut.
We are hurting.
And so are our pets.
This was this from this is uh well, Terry Jeffrey has a good piece, Cybercast News Service on Obama's vision for government-run childhood.
Government-run childhood.
One of the most dramatic changes in American life in the years since World War II-O!
Speaking of which, World War II.
I read today, those of you from the greatest generation, you World War II vets, still alive.
Apparently on Monday night or Sunday, coming up soon, PBS is going to run a documentary on World War II, in which the whole notion that we were the good guys is going to be turned upside down.
That we used totalitarian dictatorship tactics to win World War II, that all we did was bomb innocent people in Dresden and Hamburg, and of course Hiroshima Nagasaki, that we were not the valent and valorous victors that we are that we were made out to be, that we couldn't have done what we did if we not partnered up with another dictator and mass murderer named Stalin.
And if you I want to prepare you, uh veterans, if you're going to watch this, because it's some Nile something or other, uh forget his name.
I've got the story here in the stack.
I'll try to remember to find it before we get out of here.
But they're going to stand the whole legacy of World War II on its head.
We were we were rotten to the core mass murderers of innocent civilians.
Now, I remember when I lived in Sacramento.
I'll get back to Obama's, you know, running childhood here in just a second.
When I lived in Sacramento, the mayor out there, what was her name?
Oh Metal Block.
Rudin.
Last name was Rutin.
Anyway, every August 1st or whatever, whatever the dates that we blew up Hiroshima Nagasaki.
August the 9th.
All the liberals Of Sacramento led by the mayor.
Gruden, maybe?
Rudin.
Big big apology, sir.
We even sent people over there to apologize for what the U.S. had done.
Very, very sorry.
National Guilt Day and so forth.
And I could remember discussing this all the years I was in Sacramento.
And of course, the Great Peace March for Global Nuclear Disarmament was going on, and the Cold War was happening in the Iran-Contra stuff, and the left was in full fledged boil over the whole concept of war, so it led to a lot of discussions on the radio, and I had to ask people, what do you what do you think the purpose of armies is?
My uh deceased good friend B. T. Collins wrote a letter to the editor of the Sacramento Bee one day in utter frustration.
Reading some of the editorials in the Gobletagou that was being printed, he was a Marine from Vietnam.
He lost limbs.
A great man.
In fact, there's a there's a book that has been written about BT that's that's on sale in uh in August the A. Whatever, six, whatever it is.
The dates are relevant.
BT wrote this letter to the editor, and he said, You people not understand something.
What's the purpose of armies?
It's to kill people and break things.
It's not meals on wheels.
It's not, you know, to deliver food supplies, it's to kill people and break things.
And the whole point you know, war is a is a terrible rotten thing.
Of course we hit civilian targets.
The Germans were bombing Berlin for crime.
The Germans were mass executing people in death camps.
Now we've got this revisionist history trying to say that we're no better and were no better than the Russians that we were allied with or that the people that we beat, because we were using the same totalitarian tactics in World War II.
So there's no concept of anybody being the good guys in this documentary.
I mean, it this if you if you are a World War II vet and you watch this, I guarantee you you are going to be enraged.
Even if you're not a World War II vet, if you just have an understanding of military history of World War II, you are going to be livid over this.
They're gonna do it.
They're gonna they're gonna well, let me just find the story instead of let me because it's gonna come up real.
It's a New York Post today, and the show is reviewed by their um their their television critic, Adam Buckman.
Yep.
Here it is.
Uh PBS showed to argue uh allies as bad as Nazis.
Members of the greatest generation, especially those with weak hearts, might want to steer clear of an upcoming PBS documentary that suggests the Allied victory in World War II was tainted and questions whether it can even be called a victory.
Moreover, the documentary titled The World, The War of the World, a New History of the Twentieth Century, asserts that the war could only be won by forming an unholy alliance with a dictator, Joseph Stalin, who was as brutal as the one they were fighting, Adolf Hitler, and by adopting the same pitiless and remorseless tactics practiced by the enemy.
The War of the World, Twentieth Century Conflict, and the Descent of the West.
Also has a companion book by Harvard and Oxford historian Niall Ferguson.
The one hour part one of the documentary premieres Monday night at 10 on PBS.
The other two parts air the following two Mondays.
World War II is the focus of part two.
Ferguson's thesis.
Instead of looking at the 20th century as having been disrupted by two world wars with periods of relative peace before, between and after them, it is more appropriate to view much of the history of the century as a continuous bloody conflict that was interrupted occasionally for a few short, exhausted catnaps of relative calm.
It is an illuminating viewpoint, writes Mr. Buckman, and Ferguson does an effective job tying all the centuries' mass deportations, enslavements, ethnic cleansings, and genocides together so that you can't help but being won over to his view that the violence of the 20th century was virtually never ending.
But it is Ferguson's revisionist view of the tactics applied by the Allies in World War II that's likely to raise the hackles of those Who have always believed in the necessity of bombing German and Japanese civilians culminating in the atomic attacks on Hiroshima and Nagasaki to end a war that we did not start.
Ferguson in a QA on PBS's website says, I think it's very hard for those who have imbibed the idea of a great generation.
That what the Allies did to defeat the Axis was in some measure to adopt totalitarian tactics.
The aim of strategic bombing was in large measure to kill German civilians by destroying the most densely populated parts of the country.
And it only really worked when the level of destruction reached apocalyptic levels.
It behooves us all to stare this reality in the face by trying to understand what it was like to be on the receiving end of fire storms like the ones that engulfed Hamburg or Dresden.
So we are going to have a PBS documentary on Monday night that is going to evoke sympathy for the innocent people that we bombed to Smitheren's, Nagasaki, Hiroshima, Hamburg, Dresden, and so forth.
We're no different than the Nazis.
And where is this airing?
And who paid for this to be done?
Government financed public television.
Harvard and Oxford educated Nile Ferguson.
This is the kind of enlightened thinking that the American left embraces and promotes, and it is yet the latest example of their attempt on a mass media basis to convince as many Americans as possible that their country,
the United States of America, is a hellhole, is a worthless sand pit, and has no right to exist as it does because our existence is based on a criminal existence, and we are no better than any of the worst despots and mass murderers that have ever lived on the planet.
Thank you, PBS.
Thank you, Niall Ferguson.
And here we are, of course, the timing of this in the midst of the presidential campaign, when the war in Iraq has turned a corner.
An attack on the U.S. military.
I mean, every element, every ingredient of what defines liberalism and leftism will be found in this presentation.
So you have been warned.
Of course I'm mad about it.
Snurdly can't believe I was able to go through that so calmly.
You don't understand what makes people do this?
They hate this country.
Well, they hate the country, Snerdley.
How many times have you sat here and heard me define liberalism as clearly and as explicitly as it can be?
They hate the country No, no, no, it's not about winning or losing World War II.
It's about taking the occasion and revising history and to write that this country is not what people think it is.
You go talk to the people who lived in France, who lived in Germany, who lived in Italy, we were liberators.
We have liberated millions of people from bondage or whatever you want to call it, dictatorship.
No, this is they've just taken the occasion to rewrite this using their credentials as academics from the greatest institutions of higher learning, Harvard and Cambridge or Oxford or what have you.
Of course, I don't care.
Look at we can argue Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
To me, this is to me this is is is inarguable.
I mean, war was started, we were in it.
We were on the verge of losing lots of men in Japan.
It's you know, warn the same way.
Once you go to battle, it's always who kills the most civilians of the others.
The other side's always that.
This notion of surgical strikes.
The liberals started that in the Vietnam era.
And they imposed it during uh the Gulf War and so forth.
And any time, any time an innocent civilian was taken out, guess what?
Marines are rapists.
Hello, Jack Mertha.
It's nothing more than an attempt to tie our hands.
Do you do you realize, folks, this thing in Iraq?
I mean, it's all well and good.
We're talking about the surge finally working.
We're the United States of America.
This could have been ended in five days if the United States had not been feminized itself and had not been forced by virtue political Correctness to fight a war with one and a half arms tied behind our backs.
I mean, it's gotten to the point where the rules of engagement require a bureaucrat on site to translate for the man in uniform or the woman with the gun.
We've got the firepower.
If we want, we can take out China and Russia today.
We've got the firepower to do it.
We're the United States of America.
Sun China might be able to take out a part of us too.
I'm not suggesting any of this, of course.
I'm trying to give you an illustration.
Everybody says, well, yeah, but it's a new kind of war over there.
You've got uh you've got guerrilla warfare, you've got house to hell.
I know.
In the old days, destroy it and rebuild it.
Can't do that.
Russia, I mean, these are ancient mosques, these are homes.
We didn't worry about that.
What we worried about was not losing.
What we worried about was winning.
What we worried about was protecting the innocent and making sure that the bad guys were defeated.
Now we're into appeasement.
Now we're into the political correct way to fight wars, and we're gonna win them, but look at what's gonna happen.
It's gonna take a long time, and it's gonna give the left to oppose this country every opportunity to rip the country as being immoral or what have you.
Of course that story makes me mad, but that it's just an it's just the latest opportunity for the left to bash this country.
Make no mistake how much they hate it.
Make no mistake whatsoever.
Now you forced Melmouth to put aside Obama wanting to raise your kids till tomorrow.
But I remember when parents raised their children.
The good old days in the United States, parents raise their kids.
Now Obama wants to take over practically from the moment they're born.
I'll tell you this.
One of the we've been joking about feminism here.
But you know, one of the success stories of feminism has been getting women out of the house, into careers and so forth during the formative years of their little children.
And guess what that's turned them over to?
Daycare centers.
Government run this, government run that.
So little bureaucrats have uh portion of the day to get their little hooks into these young skulls full of mush.
And though there's been a reversal, a lot of women who've sought the corporate world, have their first babies say, gee, I like this.
I want to stay home, so the feminists think they're losing on this.
Uh so Obama says, well, it's not enough.
Oh, we need uh we're performance in the junior high, high school is so bad we need to start educating these kids even sooner.
Not mentioning head starts a dramatic failure, so let's start even early failing.
And they want to get hold of your kids as early as they can.
On the basis that it'll help.
I mean, all this is done with this altruistic.
We only want to help raise your kids.
But implicit in the program is the assumption that you can't raise your kids because you're not qualified.
And your reason you're not qualified because your kids can't read when they're 10.
And they can't they can't read even less when they're 15.
So you, the parents must be doing something wrong.
So the schools and the government, which is really the source of the failure to educate your kids, is saying you're the blame.
We need to get hold of your kids even earlier.
So as to make sure that we can make sure they can read and go to job training services after they graduate from high school without being able to read their diploma.
Chicago Tribune, an angry mayor Richard Daly called the Supreme Court's overturning of the D.C. gun ban a very frightening decision, and he vowed to fight vigorously any challenge to Chicago's gun ban.
The mayor of Chicago, Richard Daly said, it's gonna happen.
These liberals are gonna screw this decision to hell with this.
We gotta protect you.
Watch, folks.
You watch.
Open line Friday tomorrow.
Can't wait.
▲
Export Selection