All Episodes
Previous Next
June 17, 2008 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:24
June 17, 2008, Tuesday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Greetings to you, music lovers, thrill seekers, conversationalists all across the fruited plan Rush Linboy here, leading the pre leaving the brigade, leading the charge, your bulwark against the attacks on the institutions and traditions that define this country's greatness and will dictate its future.
Telephone number if you want to join us is 800-282-2882, and the email address is L Rushbo at EIBNet.com.
A warning again if you're just joining us, if you're welfare recipient, you're just getting up and just now turning on the uh radio.
I I got a c re reading the book last night, I could not stop it, protect and defend Vince Flynn, uh the author, and I I started about so 1030, and I just I could not stop it.
So I got to bed, I finished at 4.30, and then I went upstairs to bed.
Hey, the cat was going nuts.
I mean, the cat wanted to be fed starting at about eleven o'clock, and I was just ignoring the cat finally jumped up on the desk and started knocking my pens on the floor and uh walking over as much of the stuff on the desk to d really, you know, I don't speak cat.
I was looking to punk and I said, Punky, I don't speak cat.
You know, you can go ahead, you can mess up my desk all you want.
I'm not leaving the book.
I'll feed you when I'm ready.
And it didn't stop her.
She just did playing with these pens and knocking them all on the floor.
Anyway, I finished the book.
So all this means is with this little sleep, uh, what usually happens is that I get giddy.
Uh the guard is down just a little bit, so just to give you a warning.
Again, 800-282-2882.
Jack Mirtha alert.
Big news here, ladies and gentlemen.
A military judge has dismissed charges against a Marine officer accused of failing to investigate the killings of twenty-four Iraqis.
Colonel Stephen Folsom dismissed charges today against Lieutenant Colonel Jeffrey Chesani after defense attorneys raised concerns that a four-star general overseeing the prosecution was improperly influenced by an investigator probing the November 2005 shootings by a Marine squad in Hadithha.
The charges were dismissed without prejudice, meaning they can be refiled, but Folsom excluded Marine Forces Central Command from future involvement.
Chesani was the highest ranking officer implicated in the case.
Here's why this is big.
From the moment television news started running pictures of this, the Democrats in Congress, led by Jack Mertha, and echoed by no less than Senator Kennedy, gleefully, joyously, happily picked up the refrain that our military was rapists, murderers, uncontrolled criminals.
They then said, We have compassion for them.
We understand that the failed Bush policies and our continual rotation of deployment is causing untold stress.
But we still need to punish these people.
We Mertha had no facts.
He proclaimed all of these Marines guilty.
Uh, in the process, demoralizing the U.S. military, lying to the American public, the drive-by media predisposed to also sanction defeat for the United States and for our military in Iraq, happily, joyfully picked up the refrain and started running stories about how these Marines were nothing but rapists and murderers, and that was the picture.
That was allowed even before any trial had begun, even before the evidence had been presented.
Mertha didn't call anybody.
He relied on news reports, pure and simple, because it fit the template, it fit the narrative.
Once again, we have an example of the unpatriotic behavior of elected Democrats in power positions in the House and the Senate, eagerly, joyfully doing whatever they could to impugn, falsely accuse, and pile on a bunch of charges which have turned out to be false.
Mertha, Kennedy, and all the others that piled on here, owe all of these people and the people of the United States of America, the U.S. Marine Corps, an apology on public television with everybody knowing that it's coming, so as many people as possible can watch this.
No less than a public apology will suffice.
It won't happen.
But this is who your modern day Democrats are.
Now I have mentioned in the past on this program, and I've been very serious in discussing Barack Obama.
I really do think that somebody else is behind this campaign.
You can even look at it if you want as an Oz behind the curtain pulling the strings.
I don't mean it that way.
I because I mean politics is what it is, and uh every every candidate has sponsors and friends and people encourage the candidate.
You gotta run, Barack, you gotta run.
There's somebody behind the strings because the things that he is saying, in response to various things McCain says or the president says, are so predictable, and they're right out of a particular page in the Democrat Party playbook.
For example, McCain has changed his mind.
In his in his mind, the facts about oil drilling and energy independence have changed.
So he is now advocating exploration and drilling for oil offshore, the United States continental shelf.
What does Obama do?
He comes out and says, this is just another example of the failed policies of the past.
Failed policies of the past is a pre-approved focus group tested little phrase.
It's a cliche.
Any Democrat can say it.
They all have said it.
I don't know what page of a playbook it's on, but it's in there.
Obama didn't think of it.
It's a traditional knee-jerk Democrat response.
What is the politics and the policies of the past when it comes to oil exploration?
What is it?
The policies of the past were discovering oil, building the oil industry, creating an energy source that led to the geometric exponential growth of the United States and world economies, that increased standards of living, that changed the way pleasure and business forever were conducted.
And Obama wants us to believe that all of that is the result of a failed policy of the past, oil discovery, oil exploration, oil discovery and refining, the creation of gasoline, jet fuel, diesel, all this is a fail.
That's why I said this is it's like they had a little three by five little uh uh or like computer file, but visualize it as a as a three by five index card holder.
And in that three by five index card holder are approved responses based on something the opponent says.
So McCain comes out in favor of oil exploration.
So somebody in the Obama office, the Democrat Party goes to a little three by five index card box, finds the appropriate response for we need to drill more oil, and out come two cards.
One says, we can't drill our way out of this.
The other says this is a continuation of failed policies of the past.
In the meantime, we're told that this is the best that the Messiah can do.
This guy that's brand new, there's never been another like him.
Nobody's smarter, nobody more compassionate, nobody with a better feel, a better touch for the circumstances of average people in the country, and all he is is a walking-talking leftist cliche.
And he comes out with these, it's like his speech.
It's like his speech in church on Sunday, urging black fathers to stay home and be fathers.
He's the first to talk about the importance of fatherhood in the black community or anywhere else.
No, lots of people have done it.
A lot of fathers have done it on their own without having to be told by the Messiah to do it.
But you know what's really ironic about that is that Obama should have and could have said, by the way, I understand why some of you fathers out there have taken leave of your responsibilities, and I intend to change it.
And that is the federal government became the provider of your responsibilities.
We provided welfare payments and AFDC payments for every child you fathered, whether you stayed home or not.
And so, as far as the mother of your children was concerned, you didn't need you.
She had us.
Well, I, Barack Obama, I'm gonna change that.
So Barack Obama is out there saying we need to fix this problem when, in truth, it's people like Barack Obama who caused the problem.
Then he's out there getting all kinds of credit for ingenuity and genius and courage for daring to say what he said in Church when it's again, it's in an index box, index card, uh, on a card in their index box.
There's somebody out there that's putting all these words in his mouth.
And a further evidence of this, ABC News posted on their website this uh story that uh Obama thinks that the way we ought to fight the war on terror is the way we fought the uh first attempt at the first bombing of the World Trade Center in 1993 in the courts.
Uh I I've taken break here, but this is just this is huge in indicating and illustrating how little Obama knows about the war on terror, about the 93 attack on the World Trade Center, about how and why certain suspects were prosecuted.
A lot of it, Senator, had to do with the fact that they were in New York.
The blind Sheikh and his buds were in New York.
They blew up the building and then they these idiots uh did something with their receipt, turning their rental truck back.
Uh they were tracked to their mosques.
The blind Sheikh was here.
Anyway, this is an interesting example.
I'll do uh the best I can.
I've had um I've been briefed on this a little bit before the program started today, so sit tight, come back, all of that, plus your phone calls.
Don't go away.
Let's go to last night's nightline.
Barack Obama, the Democrat presidential nominee, appeared in Jake Tamper interviewed him.
Jake Tamper asked him this question.
Senator Obama, you applauded the decision that the Supreme Court made last week.
The Bush administration says that no matter what people think about their other programs, other policies they've initiated, there has not been a terrorist attack within the U.S. since 9-11.
And they say the reason that is is because of the domestic programs, many of which you opposed.
The NSA surveillance program, Guantanamo Bay, and other programs.
How do you know that they're wrong?
It's not possible that they're right.
It is my firm belief that we can uh track terrorists, we can crack down on threats against the United States, but we can do so within the constraints of our Constitution.
Let's take the example of Guantanamo.
What we know is that in previous terrorist attacks, for example, the first attack against the World Trade Center, we were able to arrest those responsible, put them on trial.
They are currently in U.S. prisons, incapacitated.
This is so dangerously ignorant, and I mean this.
I I'm not trying to be funny.
I know I'm a naturally funny guy.
I'm not trying to be insulting.
This is dangerously ignorant.
Let's go back to 1993.
Yep, we did apprehend a bunch of these guys.
Sh uh the blind Sheikh Omar Abdel Rahman, a number of others, they were here.
They were right in New York.
They gave themselves away.
We already had intel that these people were here and were doing things.
But we didn't catch them all.
Do you know who also we you know who was involved in this we didn't get?
Khalid Sheikh Mohammed.
The name ring a bell.
Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, who was part of the first '93 World Trade Center bombing, was not apprehended, Senator Obama, and guess what he did?
He finished the job on 9-11, 2001.
And between the bombing of the World Trade Center in 1993 and the destruction of the World Trade Center in 2001, after we had arrested these guys, Senator, and after we had incapacitated them, uh incapacitated them, what happened?
More terrorist attacks occurred all over the world against Americans, Cobar Towers, the USS Cole, and might I remind you, Senator, with these guys in captivity in our prisons.
9-11 still happened, Senator, but since 9-11, we have not had a single attack on the soil of the United States.
What's different?
We've not been using the court system, Senator.
We have been in the belly of the beast.
We took the fight to them.
It happens to be Afghanistan and Iraq.
And you know what, Senator?
We're wiping them out.
The Taliban has been disbanded, they're trying to reband, but they're having trouble.
In Iraq, Al Qaeda in Iraq is on the run.
I mean, even the AP, the AP today, in one of my stacks has to admit it has turned around in Iraq, both militarily and politically.
I can't believe it, but it's there.
What's changed, Senator?
He wants to go back and fight the war on terror the way the Clintons did.
What's new about that?
Where is the change in that?
He wants to fight the war on terror in the court system.
Hey, Senator, do you know something?
We indicted, when do we do?
We indicted uh Obama.
We indicted him long before, in fact, the uh 9-11 bombings.
After the embassy bombings, the U.S. Embassy bombings.
Bin Laden was indicted along with his top henchman, Aaman Al Zawahiri.
Also 24 others were indicted.
You know how many of those twenty-four have been executed, prosecuted, I should say, six of them.
Exactly six.
And of those, the top ranking Al Qaeda figure, Mahmoud Mahmoud Salim, has never been tried for the embassy bombing, and that's because when we gave him all the glorious privileges of the American Constitution, he used his access to free legal help as an opportunity to attempt a kidnapping escape from custody, in the course of which he maimed a prison guard by stag stabbing him in the eye before being subdued.
The attack on the USS Cole happened in October of 2000 in Aden Harbor, Yemen.
No arrests, Senator.
No indictment until well after the 9-11 attacks.
That indictment has been on the books for years.
As our Yemeny allies have pretended to pursue the Al Qaeda perpetrators.
There's no prospect of an American prosecution because of the justice system's painfully obvious limitations.
But look, the the the major point here is another opening for Senator McCain.
A huge opening for Senator McCain to draw a huge distinction.
Here is Barack Obama, the Messiah, the candidate of change, the candidate of doing it a different way.
The candidate of the future.
And in prosecuting the war on terror, he wants to go back and replicate the policies of the Clinton administration.
When you're prosecuting the war on terror in your own court system, you are not prosecuting the war on terror.
You can indict the world.
If you can't apprehend the people you've indicted, you haven't done diddly squat.
All you've done, Senator, is do what you're elitist.
Northeast corridor buddies love, and that's this whole little magic phrase called due process.
Oh yes.
When we've engaged in due process as Americans, we love ourselves.
We are good people.
We are following our constitution.
And while we engage in due process, the people that we are using due process to uh uh apprehend are continually blowing other people up around the world.
And we, we great good Americans, we can fall back on due process.
We're good people.
Didn't stop 9-11 from happening, did it, Senator?
All this stuff that you want to reinstitute didn't stop it from happening.
Well, we haven't had an attack since, Senator.
You think it's because the Bush administration has thrown indictments down all over the world?
You think it's because the Supreme Court's usurping the commander in chief role?
You think it's because your lawyer buddies and your judge buddies are gonna get to run the war on terror now in our court system?
Or do you think, Senator, that one of the reasons why we have not been attacked since 9-11 has been because brighter people than you will ever be looked at the past and said this isn't working in our court system, and we deployed the mighty, the brave and the courageous United States military to do the job.
And guess what, Senator?
Despite the fact that you have 2020 vision.
For the future, you can't see the present.
And the and you don't even want to go see the present in Iraq.
Understand he is going to go.
The fact of the matter is, Senator, this brave and courageous United States military is what's prevented an attack on this country since 91.
They don't deal in indictments, Senator.
They have to put up with members of people in your party accusing them of rape and murder of women and children.
And yet they still do the job and have made it safe for your skinny little rear end to run around and utter all these inane stupidities while people think you're the Messiah.
You owe them a debt of thanks, sir, not the court system.
Okay, I've got to go back to the phones here, folks.
People have been patiently waiting, but we still have lots to do here.
Back to the phones to uh Bill in Kenmore, Washington.
Hi, Bill, great to have you uh with us.
Hey.
It seems to me, it seems to me what this guy's talking about is uh police action.
Police action only works after Are you talking you uh you you're talking about uh the Obama, yeah, the Amasia.
Yeah, yeah, the uh aerial cerebral Obama.
There's you know, we are being sold a bill of goods on this, and it's it's and and I think a lot of people are buying it because of these soaring speeches that say nothing that are written for him by David Lexarod.
Uh there's there's there's there's really this this guy is not it in by any stretch uh the way he's being marketed and packaged.
No, but he's he's talking about a police action.
Police is only after the crime.
It doesn't do anything about preventing the crime.
That's exactly that's an excellent point.
That's an excellent point.
You're gonna use the court system, what?
You gotta wait till they got the way till the criminals hit you.
Yeah, every time you call the police for something, uh, you know, they say, Well, have they done anything yet?
They won't do anything until it's been happened.
You know, you can't prosecute a murder until it's been done.
Right.
Well, I'm f uh not necessarily if the Democrats get total control.
Um I'm not sure what they'll change in terms of people they don't want to do.
I'm being facetious here, but yes, you're absolutely talking about using the Constitution, follow the Constitution.
Well, that means you can't do anything until the crime.
That's that's that's what I meant, but these guys are so taken with this whole notion of duprofits and fairness.
See, everybody to them, they look for the victim everywhere they can find him.
And of course, in American and world geopolitics, everybody outside America is a victim, a victim of us.
We're the world's only superpower, and we just giant footprint, we're just squashing people like bugs all over the world, wiping them out, invading countries, and these people that fight back, these poor little victims who fight back, like Al Qaeda, who can't take us being the world superpower.
Will we capture them while we're really mean to them to find out what they know about the next attack?
We need to grant them due process.
I'm telling you, these people, the Democrat Party may one day, in the past, it may have been constituted with people about whom you could say they were the backbone of America, but no longer.
If if Barack Obama had been around during World War I or World War II and running this country, if the Democrat Party had been constituted then as it is today, with all of its various constituents' groups, America would not exist today as it did, as it does.
We'd still be here, but uh it would be an entirely entirely different country than it is today.
These people have uh they they're ladled with so much guilt, they think that we deserve some of what's happening to us, if not more of what happens to us, because we're just too big and too powerful.
And so this whole notion of everybody else being a victim, Al Qaeda's a victim, everybody's a victim.
Mahmoud Ahmedini says he's actually a victim.
We're making him the way he is.
This is what these people think.
That's why they want to go talk to him.
Obama wants to go talk to these people, say, look, we understand how you feel.
We know that you hate us because we've had some cowboy presidents here who have invaded your lair your area, and we've had our bases and our interests there, and we know you don't like us because we're supporting Israel and so forth.
And you have a point.
I just want you to know that with me in charge, uh no longer are are we going to uh act as the cowboy of the world and and uh we're gonna back off here and and of course Ahmedini's out and his little nutcase buddies to sit there and chuckle and laugh at this.
But this is what they this is what they genuinely think.
They're nothing but a bunch of Neville Chamberlains.
I mean, the whole damn Democrat Party, leftist movement's a bunch of Neville Chamberlains.
And that's what Obama is here.
And this this recitation of his on comparing Guantanamo Bay, Guantanamo Bay to the 1993 World Trade Center is just so ignorant.
It is ignorant of history that's recent.
What, fifteen years ago was nineteen ninety-three when the World Trade Center was first hit?
Fifteen years, it's not that bad.
He was just getting rated to be a Chicago community organizer.
He knows what's going on.
Or does he?
There's something about this that just doesn't pass smell test.
This whole campaign does not pass the smell test.
And it's going to show up, is going to show up more and more as this this whole thing uh unfolds.
Here's Troy in New Orleans.
Hi, Troy, glad you called.
Nice to have you with us.
Hi, Russia.
First time calling a bit nervous, but uh I was just thinking we were giving uh these terrorists uh U.S. citizens' rights, basically, and they got it, they got to be rolling all around on their backs laughing at us.
Well, I mean they're lawyers.
They do what they want.
I'm sorry.
Their lawyers certainly are laughing.
But this is a huge problem.
Not just the not just the substance of the Supreme Court's decision, Troy, but but look at it from a logistics standpoint.
What are there?
Two hundred and seventy people down in Club Gitmo right now.
And nobody knows how this is going to manifest itself.
But these guys are going to be dumped on the U.S. court system.
Put where?
What guidelines are these judges going to have?
This was not in the Supreme Court decision.
This is a this is an absolute disaster, not to mention a rape of the U.S. Constitution.
All right.
Well, I'm thinking what they're gonna what's gonna happen next.
They're gonna sue us for monetarily for wrongful imprisonment.
You know, uh the government's gonna have to pay them millions of dollars.
Uh I I don't know that they're gonna have standing to file civil suits.
That's another thing that remains to be seen.
But you are on to something.
They're the the the tort bar, the plaintiff's bar of lawyers is gonna see to it.
They're gonna they're gonna lobby for that.
And the Democrat Party would love nothing better than a whole bunch of show trials.
The United States being sued for gazillions by these poor little victims that have been mistreated and tortured and held against their will by the Bush administration.
Yes.
You're on to something there, sir.
This is and it's it's not quite understood where this is all headed, because the Supreme Court, of course, didn't sit there and say, here's how you do it.
They just said what you've been doing you can't do.
You're holding these people without uh due process, habeas corpus and all this.
It's just we're we're I'll tell you where we're ultimately going to have to fight the left, folks, and that's in the court system.
We we have the decision, uh Supreme Court decision yesterday, basically a green light for illegal immigration, regardless of the will of the people here, and that was a that was an extra legal decision.
That that that was not their purview to make that ruling in that case.
Constitution doesn't grant them at the Supreme Court immigration policy.
The Congress makes that.
The representatives of the people elected representatives, the courts is where we're gonna have to beat back liberals.
It's not it's in addition to Congress and the Senate, of course, local legislatures and so it's also gonna have to include the uh the courts.
Jeff in Pittsburgh, hello, sir.
Nice to have you with us.
Yeah, right, you're the man.
Thank you, sir.
Well, you've talked about environmental uh policies and oil earlier, and I was just wondering what your take is on the idea that we need to boost up the economy with tomorrow's energy, you know, government mandated green jobs and new technology, uh kind of like the environmentalist economics, which is an oxymoron if I've ever heard one.
You may tell you something.
This whole notion of green jobs is nothing but a scam.
It is nothing but a sham.
The the the the if if the uh green movement, if the environmentalists got what they want, we would lose jobs.
Right.
We would slow the economy town to the point we'd lose jobs.
Let me explain this greens thing, this green stuff for you.
Have you noticed that a lot of American corporations are signing on and going green?
Like General Electric is going green, and you'll watch once a month, they'll force their network, MSNBC, to do 18 or 12 hours on green this and green that, and they've got you know little like logos and icons, uh, and they they their set turns green and they do reports on what all they're doing to be green.
Uh the Fox Television Network put out a press release last January saying that the production of the TV show 24 is gonna be done in a green fashion, meaning with less lights and less air conditioning and so forth, not in the plot of the show.
But I mean, you've all these retailers, uh, even some car dealers are going green.
Here's why.
They believe two things.
One, they believe that the American people have bought into the notion that America is responsible for global warming, and therefore America is responsible for fixing it.
And they think that since a majority of people believe it, they don't want to fight the issue.
They just want to sell products.
So if they and and market to people, so if they believe that a majority of American consumers believe this green garbage, then they're gonna get on a bandwagon.
Here's but here's the real secret.
If you are American Corporation A and you manufacture a product, it is much easier to convince people to buy that product, thinking that they are doing something good for the green movement, for global warming, for pollution or whatever.
And it's much easier to sell the sale of that product on that basis rather than, hey, buy this so that our profits go up.
Buy this so that our stock price goes up.
The corporations are able to go green and sell these products on a green basis, taking themselves out of the equation.
So who can, I mean, and not only taking themselves out of the equation, they're getting, in their opinion, added PR.
So people are gonna go out and buy whatever it is.
A toothbrush, I don't care what it is that's being marketed as a green product.
It'll be much easier for people to buy it if they think the profits are going to save the planet rather than enrich the company.
So corporations love it.
You cannot assume that because all these corporations are going green, that they've signed on to this global warming business.
They're just marketers.
And brilliant marketers do not tell you the marketing plan.
They execute it, they implement it.
Uh there are many corporations that are that are actually furious with this, but they've got no choice because their market research is saying that right now people are in the mood to buy green because it makes them feel good.
So they gotta go along.
This this whole thing.
The whole thing is is marketing, and it's brilliant because it's working, but it's a scam at the same time, and it's based on a hoax.
Rush Limbaugh, the epitome of morality and virtue.
A man you could and would trust your closest friends, your loved ones, and your pets.
Overnight in a motel six while you're out of town on business.
Audio soundbite time.
We got I mentioned earlier that Al Gore and his endorsement is like a curse.
It's tantamount to the Clinton curse.
Here is uh here is Al Gore last night in Michigan endorsing Obama.
Yes, we can.
Ladies and gentlemen, the next president of the United States of America, Barack Obama.
Rattle, rattle, rattle, rattle.
Rattle, rattle, rattle.
Stop it.
Here is Al Gore, December 9th, 2003, in Harlem.
I'm very proud and honored to endorse Howard Dean to be the next president of the United States of America.
I don't know, Radio, I don't know, Howard Dean.
And here is Al Gore, July 26th, 2004 in Boston at the Democrat National Convention.
We're here this week to present to the nation, the man who should be and will be our new president, John Kerry.
Track record not good for Al Gore.
He then went on to make some remarks after endorsing Obama last night in Michigan, such as this comment everything that's happened since Gore tried to steal the 2000 election is Bush's fault.
Take it from me.
Elections matter.
If you think the next appointments to our Supreme Court are important, you know that elections matter.
Rado, rather.
If you live in the city of New Orleans, you know that elections matter.
Stop the tape.
Stop the tape.
Yes, you do know that elections matter if you live in New Orleans.
The election of Bobby Gendal, Senator Gore, Vice President Gore, whatever.
The state's finally turning around.
He's referring to Hurricane Katrina.
I have been practicing great restraint here, but these Democrats keep bringing up Hurricane Katrina and they keep using it to indict the Bush administration.
I want to know.
I look at Iowa.
I look at Illinois.
I want to see the murders.
I want to see the looting.
I want to see all the stuff that happened in New Orleans.
I see devastation in Iowa and Illinois that dwarfs what happened in New Orleans.
I see people working together.
I see people trying to save their property and save their reputation.
I don't see a bunch of people running around waving guns at helicopters.
I don't see a bunch of people shooting cops.
I don't see a bunch of people raping people on the street.
I don't see a bunch of people doing everything they can and whining and moaning, where's FEMA?
Where's Bush?
I don't see.
I see the heartland of America.
When I look at Iowa and when I look at Illinois, I see the backbone of America, and I see people who are doing with the best, what they have, the best they have and the best they can to straighten the situation out.
I don't see, and I don't hear a bunch of caterwalling about where's FEMA and where's Bush.
And I don't hear a bunch of people whining and moaning about how lackluster and poor the response has been.
I see people not waiting around.
I see people who are trying to handle a situation on their own.
And I know there are a lot of Democrats up there.
Don't misunderstand here.
I I this continual reference to Hurricane Katrina by Democrats like Al Gore, elections matter.
Like the aftermath of New Orleans wouldn't have happened if Bush had not been president.
You mean if Al Gore had been president and Katrina had still happened, that somehow all of the rot that happened in New Orleans afterward would not have happened, simply because Al Gore was in the White House, they wouldn't have been waving guns at the helicopters.
Congressman William Jefferson, Democrat Louisiana, wouldn't have confiscated a couple of rescue vehicles to go to his house and rescue his $90,000 in cold cash that he had in a freezer.
Are you saying there wouldn't have been the rapes and what all of else we heard that went on in New Orleans, if Al Gore or a Democrat had been in the White House?
It would have been worse.
With a Democrat in a White House, the people in New Orleans would have sat around and done even less to help themselves.
This this continual Katrina reference, somebody in a Republican Party has got to stand up, grow a pair, and say, enough of this.
There have been countless disasters since Hurricane Katrina.
But I'll be damned if I can remember the Democrats or the media looking at any of them the same way they did at Hurricane Katrina in New Orleans.
And we all know why.
All right, resume this tape of Gore.
I forgot this play the rest of this dick.
If you are a member of your family are serving in the active military, the National Guard or reserves, you know that elections matter.
Oh my wounded veteran, you know that elections matter.
If you've lost your job, if you're struggling with your mortgage, you know that elections matter.
*Sigh*
This guy is the absolute kiss of death for his own party.
This this you know you could take the combined IQ of this guy and this Obama and some of the others that are running this show.
And it would not equal that of a pencil eraser.
We got time for one more bite.
Yeah.
Look at just listen to this.
If you care about a clean environment, if you want a government that protects you instead of special interests, you know that elections matter.
If you care about food safety, if you like a T on your BLT, you know that elections matter.
If you bought poison lead-filled toys from China or adulterated medicine made in China.
If you bought tainted pet food made in China, you know that elections matter.
After the last eight years, even our dogs and cats have learned that elections matter.
Yeah.
Yeah, and I'm sure you're gonna go out and try to get a bunch of votes from Those dogs and cats.
Uh it doesn't even require commentary, and even if it did, I'm out of time and patience.
A fascinating story coming up about all the uh hybrids, the electric cars, and what will happen when a whole bunch of them finally do hit the road.
That and lots of other things.
▲
Export Selection