All Episodes
Previous Next
June 9, 2008 - Rush Limbaugh Program
37:26
June 9, 2008, Monday, Hour #1
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome to today's edition of The Rush 247 Podcast.
It's a big day today, folks.
I'm a little excited sitting here.
In less than one hour, his Steveness, Steve Jobs will address her worldwide developers conference and announce whatever's new in the new iPhone and the new iPhone software.
I don't know.
I'm just a techie.
I just love this stuff.
Anyway, greetings, my friends, and welcome, Rush Limbaugh.
I hope you had a great weekend.
I certainly did.
No, Snurley.
She didn't endorse Obama.
Everybody is missing what happened Saturday with Mrs. Clinton.
She I mean she said the words, but she didn't endorse Obama.
Greetings, my friends.
Great to have you here.
Telephone number 800-282-2882, and the email address is L Rushbow at EIBNet.com.
I tuned in Saturday morning.
I wanted to see this because I had seen throughout the weekend on Friday anyway, Friday afternoon, that the drive bys, particularly CNN and DNC TV, MSNBC, were covering this withdrawal from the race.
Unbelievably, like it was a funeral, like it was the major, major event in the world, that it was just so overblown and so overdone.
So I got up and true to form an hour, hour and a half before she scheduled a show up.
We're getting these analyses of what she might say, what she's going to say, and so forth, Mrs. Clinton getting out.
It was it was just so over the top.
It was irrational.
And then she's 40 minutes late.
40 minutes late.
She hangs around in the home somewhere in her hand in Washington.
And then they started speculating, whoa, this is really disrespectful to her audience, perhaps a little disrespectful to Obama.
She's supposed to withdraw at noon.
She finally showed up, started speaking at 1245.
Uh ladies and gentlemen, I have to agree.
Peggy Noonan wrote about this for the New York Post, and I have to agree with a couple things she said.
Number one, uh, if you if you watch this, and I'm a student of the Clintons, and Peggy Noonan is right about this.
When Mrs. Clinton was talking about herself, she was radiant, buoyant, a bon vivant.
She was gesticulating.
She was smiling.
When it came time to mention, not endorse, mention Obama, she read.
There was no gesticulation.
There was no animation.
There weren't any smiles.
A couple smiles here and there, sort of like a McCain telepromp smile.
It fit.
It didn't fit when she did it.
And the other key thing, the other key thing in this I noticed, you show up at a place to get out of the race.
And by the way, you know, the place they did this, the National Building Museum is the same location that the National Review magazine 50th anniversary bash was held, and I sat there at Mr. Buckley's table with uh K. Bailey Hutcheson and Joe Lieberman.
Uh and it was a black tie event.
It's a beautiful place.
It's a beautiful building.
But if you're going to announce that you are getting out of the race, I don't care where you hold it, whoever shows up is a bunch of they will stick with you till the end diehards.
These are people that don't want to give up.
These are people that don't want to quit.
Why go to someone's appearance where they're gonna say, Nomas, I'm out of here, it's over with.
Why go to that unless you are a true believer?
So in that audience, we had true believers.
She mentioned Obama's name 15 times.
She knew that every time she mentioned Obama's name because of the nature of that crowd, that there were going to be people in there that would boo, and there were.
And the boos were audible even to me, and I am deaf.
I turned up the sound.
Normally I watch television with clothes captioning because the noise emanating is just noise to me when you've got crowds cheering and all that.
But I turned it up and I went into a room that I have a uh, you know, acousticized, if that's a word, so it's fabric on the wall, it's you know, everything gets absorbed.
There's not a the sound in the reverb, and I watched it in there, and I could hear the booze, and she and she made it a point.
Now, if you are Mrs. Clinton, and you are serious about unifying the party and bringing the party together, and you know that your crowd's not happy about what you're gonna do, that you're gonna quit, and they don't like Obama.
You only mentioned his name once or twice, not fifteen.
She gave that crowd 15 opportunities to boo Barack Obama, and they did.
The drive-by's tried to ignore it, but as usual, the bloggers caught it, forcing the drive-bys to admit it and then ignore it.
And I'm sitting, I'm watching this.
There, there is there's simply no way that this was a genuine heart.
She said the words, but she's she's she's looking down as she reads them and then looks up at the audience with sort of a you know, a uh a joker kind of smile, kind of permanently on the face, is like an inanimate smile.
And I got I got watching this, and I'm listening to the drive-by's, particularly on NBC, and they're just having orgasms.
Oh, this is wonderful, oh, this is great.
Oh, the party's coming together, all this, oh that.
And I'm saying, you guys are so blind, you are so susceptible to the conventional wisdom you don't understand what's going on.
We're talking about a Clinton here.
The Clintons don't go away.
The Clintons, you you could you'd have to, you'd have to show them the cross at sunup, two inches from their eyes, and even then they wouldn't go away.
They would snatch the cross out from your hand and they would stomp on it.
Little dracular reference there for those of you in uh in Rio Linda.
Uh she's I I guarantee she didn't release her delegates.
Hold on to them.
Hell's bells.
And she can go out and she can raise money.
She's got to retire her debt and so forth.
She can do that up to the convention.
She held on to her um uh her delegates, meaning if Obama slips and falls, and you know, he is.
This is Obama is slipping and falling all over the place.
Over the weekend, the guy that runs a little green football's blog, I think Charles Johnson found a bunch of places on Obama's website.
One of them was The Truth of the Jewish Lobby, and it was one of the most anti-Semitic posts that you've ever seen, and it was still up there.
Finally, the Obama website took it down.
There was also a uh a praise from some Muslim militant or something that was on the website.
There are a lot of things that are happening.
Obama, as I told you this during the primaries, and the superdelegates know this, they are worried silly here.
This because right now he's writing on a wing and a prayer, is writing on pure image, the Messiah business, but he's got five months to go with this stuff.
Here, we have just give you an i illustration.
This is audio from last Thursday in Bristol, Virginia, at a campaign event.
I've I've I've constantly noted, ladies and gentlemen, I've passed this along to you constantly noted.
You take the prompter and the written speeches away from Barack Obama, and you've got nothing.
You got nothing like the guy with the soaring rhetoric and the inspiring sermon-like quality.
You have nothing like that.
This is why I don't think Obama will do as many of these town hall meetings with McCain as his camp is saying.
In fact, you know, Bloomberg in New York got together with ABC and they offered um the federal hall in New York for the first of these this coming Thursday night with ABC telecasting it and uh both campaigns turned it down.
Both camp, yes, Don, yes, they did.
Both campaigns turned it down.
The McCain camp said, no, not one network, every network.
All right, I'll do it.
So they didn't want to give it to one particular network.
Obama, you know, his comfort level is doing these things on CNN and MSNBC.
So anyway, you listen to this last Thursday in Bristol, Virginia.
This is Obama talking about Iraq, and I just want to preface this by telling you if this were George Bush that you were listening to, this would have been commented on since it happened.
You would have had people all over the country say, Gosh, can't we get a guy that can talk?
Can't we get a guy that can put two thoughts together?
Listen to this.
This is Obama.
What they'll say is, well, it cost too much money.
But you know what?
It would cost about it, it would cost about the same as what we would spend.
Over the course of ten years, it would cost what it would cost us.
It it all right.
Okay.
We're going to.
The it would cost us about the same as it would cost for about.
Hold on one second.
I can't hear myself.
But I'm glad you're fired up, though.
I'm glad.
Ted Kennedy could do a better job.
Ted Kennedy could do a better job.
This was Barack Obama Thursday in Bristol.
You want to hear this again?
This is a side.
You haven't seen this in a I have seen this.
I have no this is the worst example of it.
But I have noticed this and I have seen this throughout these town hall and debate situations.
You take the teleprompter away, take the script away, take all this PS about change and hope and all that grunge away from him.
And this is this is here.
Listen it one more time, and then we have his explanation for why he muffed it so badly.
What they'll say is, well, it cost too much money.
But you know what?
It would cost about it would cost about the same as what we would spend over the course of ten years, it would cost what it would cost us.
All right.
Okay.
We're going to.
The it would cost us about the same as it would cost for about hold on one second.
I can't hear myself.
But I'm glad you're fired up, though.
I'm glad.
Now there was a there's a lot of crowd noise going on that we just took it out so you could hear what No, I'm not I I am not I'm not kidding you.
That's Obama.
Now, uh this is how he explained it.
Everybody knows that it makes no sense that you send a kid to the emergency room for a treatable illness like asthma, they end up taking up a hospital bed, it costs when if you they just gave you gave them treatment early, and they got some treatment and uh a breathalyzer or an inhalator, not a breathalyzer.
I haven't had much sleep in the last 48 hours.
Okay, that's it.
It hadn't had much sleep in the last four.
It's inhaler.
There's no such thing as an inhalator.
And a breathalyzer.
A breathalyzer is what they give you if you have been overserved of adult beverages and you're driving around and a cops catch you.
So let's listen to these two back to back.
Obama last Thursday in Bristol, Virginia, two days before Mrs. And by the way, wasn't he have when did he have that meeting with Mrs. Clinton in Dai Fi's house?
Was that Wednesday night or Thursday night?
I thought I thought it was Thursday night.
Can you imagine if he's still talking this way when he got together with her?
What they'll say is, well, it cost too much money.
But you know what?
It would cost about it, it would cost about the same as what we would spend.
Over the course of ten years, it would cost what it would cost us.
All right.
Okay.
We're going to.
It would cost us about the same as it would cost for about hold on one second.
I can't hear myself.
But I'm glad you're fired up, though.
I'm glad.
Everybody knows that it makes no sense that you send a kid to the emergency room for a treatable illness like asthma, they end up taking up a hospital bed, it costs when if you they just gave you gave them treatment early, and they got some treatment and uh a breathwiser or an inhalator, not a breathalyzer.
I haven't had much sleep in the last 48 hours.
On a different subject, ladies and gentlemen, the one that I'm uh very serious about, I I want to ask all of you a question, and I would like to be able to ask this question to uh everybody who is not listening to the program right now.
What's it gonna take?
How long is it going to be before you all have had enough of the encroachment of your freedom and your liberty?
How long is it going to be before you stand up and tell the leftists in this country, stop, shut up, go back home?
We are not going to let you ruin this country.
At what point?
This is not even about Obama.
I'm not even talking about Obama.
I saw something in the newspaper Friday on the news after I finished this program.
Seattle, Washington.
They are thinking of banning bonfires on beaches in Seattle, Washington, because of global warming.
I cannot tell you how infuriated I have been and am, and was made even more so by that story.
Bonfires equaling global warming.
At what point?
Look, I know the people live in Seattle are primarily liberals, and bonfires on the beach don't cause any problem whatsoever with global warming.
This is absurd.
Now, at some point, and I fear we're not there yet, most of the times when freedom is taken away slowly under false premises such as saving the planet or securing this or that, or for whatever reason, people gladly, without question, give away a little liberty a lot of the time.
And when they finally realize that they've given a lot of it away, it's too late to get it back without a serious upheaval of elected representation in Washington and in state capitals.
It is time for people to say they are fed up.
Bonfires on the beach leading to global warming.
That is absurd, it is stupid, and it is illustrative of what the true agenda is on the part of America's leftists, and that is to make certain that this country is in a constant state of decline, to make certain that the people of this country are brought down to size.
The rest of the world needs to see the American economy shrink, the American people be punished for their sins of prosperity for all these centuries, decades.
And at some point, folks, we don't have any elected leadership in Washington that's going to stand up and do this.
At some point we're going to have to do it ourselves.
I've got much more on this.
I can't tell you how fit to be tied I am about this, but I got a quick break.
We'll come back after this and continue.
Hi, welcome back.
Rush Limbaugh behind the Golden EIB microphone, kicking off a brand new week of broadcast excellence.
Seattle Parks and Recreation might do what the chilly weather in Seattle couldn't do this week, and that is dow's the long tradition of beach bonfires at two different beaches.
Park department staff is recommending reducing bonfires at the two beaches this summer and possibly banning them all together next year.
The park board will hear the recommendation Thursday.
The city plans to run public service announcements and hand out brochures later this month about the effects of bonfires on global warming.
At what point are all of us collectively on this collectively going to stand up and just say stop?
At what point are we going to tell these people that their ideas are absurd, but that our personal liberty is more important, and that it is our liberty and freedom which has made this the greatest country on the face of the earth and the friendliest to the most nations on the earth in the history of world history, in the history of the planet.
At what point are we going to stand up and say and laugh, are you serious?
Bonfires cause global warming.
The carbon footprint from bonfires cause global warming.
And people are just going to sit around, okay, no more bonfires in New York, out of Long Island they have.
Bonfires have been banned for a certain time each year to protect a bird.
The piping plover.
There was a story over the weekend about drought in California.
It turns out the reason for the drought is a federal judge who made a decision in January to stop the flow of water from the Sacramento Delta to the southern part of the state because a fish had gotten somehow entangled in the pumps.
And so for half the year, maybe seven months, the people of California had to deal with less water so the fish would not be harmed by pumps.
I know that I joke about the circumstance here in Florida, all along the East Coast with the turtle lights and so forth, but it's all the same.
And it and it never stops, and it's happening happening incrementally.
Our liberty, our freedom, is being eroded.
It is being taken from us, and we are buying into this because they are doing it and ladling it out with guilt.
We have sinned.
We have lived too prosperously.
We have lived too carelessly.
Despite the fact we are the cleanest major industrial nation in the world.
We clean up our messes better than any other nation in the industrialized world that has any significant size whatsoever.
The piping plover, the bonfires.
And I'm sure you can think of a number of recent examples.
In Minneapolis, the Minneapolis City Council and the mayor approved changes Friday to the city's vehicle idling ordinance that aims to reduce air pollution.
The ordinance limits most vehicle idling to three minutes, except in traffic.
Global warming.
You cannot idle your car longer than three minutes.
It's none of their damn business.
And note where they're doing all this stuff first in these far left estates.
And welcome back, ladies and gentlemen, Rush Limbaugh not needing my inhalator today in order to do my program, nor do I need a breathalyzer to do my program today, as Senator Obama recently stated that people need the government to run their inhalators and breathalyzers when they have asthma.
At any rate, ladies and gentlemen, let me tackle this bonfire thing in a in a in my normal way of doing this.
I I we've we try to refute all of this on the basis of either the science of it or the logic of it or the spirituality of it or what have you.
But at some point that's going to have to change because it isn't working.
Well, I don't think it's working.
I'm not quite certain about this, but I'm optimistic.
Let's look at this bonfire business.
In Seattle, two beaches.
They're going to ban bonfires.
They're going to limit them this year, maybe ban them next year.
Why global warming?
Folks, this is Marxism.
This is not about science.
It can't possibly be about science.
Turn on your television and look at a wildfire that destroys homes in Southern California, in Northern California.
They happen every spring, and how do they start?
Lightning.
Do we do the lightning?
Can we start lightning strikes?
Can we stop them?
No.
And yet, is anybody said we need to ban lightning?
Because lightning leads to forest fires and wildfires.
You talk about a carbon footprint.
How about natural grass fires that agriculture does on purpose?
Controlled grass burns.
Have you ever seen one of those?
I am from the middle part of this country in the state of Missouri.
Saw grass fires all the time.
They stink.
There's lots of smoke, but they are necessary agriculturally.
Far more pollutants, quote unquote, than from a series of bonfires.
This is about as absurd as when Southern California tried to ban outdoor grilling some years ago.
This would be in the 80s, late 80s, under the theory that everybody at the same time within a two-hour period between, say, 5 and 7 p.m. at night, would light up their outdoor charcoal barbecue pits, that the pollution would rock the stability of our climate.
And people refuse to put up with that then.
This is not science.
This is not about pollution.
This is not about keeping things clean.
This is Marxism.
This is leftists on the prowl on the march, who despise this country's greatness, who seek to cut it down to size.
And one of the ways they do so is to punish our economy.
And by punishing the economy, and one of the only ways to punish the economy and to lower it, to attack it, is to deny all of us our personal freedom.
A story from the French news agency just now.
Families in the United States have to save more if the country is to reduce a deficit in payments with the rest of the world, said the World Trade Organization today.
In a review of U.S. trade policy, the World Trade Organization said that if consumers saved more and spent less, then there would be less demand for imported goods.
That would help to reduce a deficit on the balance of payments into and out of the United States.
The United States may require to raise its savings rate while maintaining its traditional openness, which allows U.S. producers and consumers to access goods, services, and capital from abroad at the best conditions.
So now the World Trade Organization wants to control our imports and exports and our personal saving.
And who is it that runs the World Trade Organization or anything to do with the United Nations?
They are not liberals.
They are not Democrats, they are Marxists, they're leftists.
Three minutes.
You can only idle your car three minutes in Minneapolis.
You know notice where all these things start.
They all start in very liberal states.
Here's the story on water in California.
It was from June the 7th in the New York Times.
Water-starved California slows development.
This is not an accident.
Water-starved California is starved because of a federal judge.
As California faces one of its worst droughts in two decades, building projects are being curtailed for the first time under state law by the inability of developers to find long-term water supplies.
Water authorities and other government agencies scattered throughout the state, including here in sprawling Riverside County east of LA, have begun denying, delaying or challenging authorization for dozens of housing tracts and other developments under a state law that requires a 20-year water supply as a condition for building.
So you keep reading and you keep reading and you keep reading and then you keep reading, and then you find this even more significant.
A judge in federal district court last year issued a curtailment in pumping from the California Delta, where the Sacramento and San Joaquin rivers meet and provide water to roughly 25 million Californians.
Now, how many people are in California?
Do you know off top your head?
37 million.
Twenty-five million of them without water, primarily south of Sacramento.
The reason the judge issued a curtailment in pumping from the California Delta South was to protect a species of endangered smelt that were becoming trapped in the pumps.
Those reductions from December to June cut back the state's water reserves this winter by about one-third.
Therefore, no building can be permitted because they can't guarantee a 20-year water supply.
The smelt problem, says the New York Times, was a powerful indicator of the environmental fallout from the Delta's water system, which was constructed over 50 years ago for a small far smaller population.
I don't know how many of you know this, and I don't mean this as a cut.
This is not criticism.
But if you were a rational human being, and there was and you and this country was not populated, but it was geographically today or a hundred years ago like it is then or now, and you were looking at it from a satellite or from whatever vantage point you wanted to, there was no way that you would say put the second largest city where Los Angeles is.
No water.
There's no water, you wouldn't do it.
But it's a beautiful place.
They did it.
The water has to come from someplace elsewhere, Colorado River.
That's why they built the Delta.
The Northern Californians love to joke that Southern California wouldn't exist without them and their water.
And they're right.
This is not a cut.
And is a it's a it's a tremendous engineering feat that we were able to do as human beings.
It's all well and good.
Federal judge can shut it all down to protect a stupid smelt.
And so the atmosphere is worth more than you.
Bonfires.
Absolute.
I am so close.
I am practicing restraint like I haven't practiced since last night when I was explaining why I was so mad to somebody.
And this person said, Do you really think, Rush, that there are people who don't like this country trying to harm it?
I say, absolutely, this isn't this is the too much of this going on for too long.
This is not coincidental.
These are not well-intentioned but misguided people.
These are mean people.
These are people with a destructive purpose, and their destruction is aimed at the liberty and freedom of the United States population.
Because it is only then that they are able to realize their true dream, which is a massive big state, a massive big government with all kinds of controls over everybody and everything, but they want to cut this country down to size.
Too big, too powerful, too mean, we steal all the world's resources.
And the sad thing and the maddening and the frustrating thing about it is we go along with it.
We go along with it.
I could spend the next 20 minutes talking to you about the turtle light thing here on Palm Beach.
Now, I'm I've done it enough, and I don't want to make this personal, because I don't want you I don't want you to think that I'm engaging in all this simply because I have a situation that I want to fix.
I'm gonna leave it out because I've talked about it enough.
This is happening all over the country in so many ways, and we've had the stories for 20 years about the curtailment of private property rights because of some protected species.
Or worse, declaring part of your property a wetland you can't touch it.
And it's hard to fight.
And the Democrats, the live the leftists have incorporated a lot of class envy in this.
So even in this country, there are people who want people who they consider to be unfairly affluent and wealthy.
They want them to suffer.
They want them to be punished for their affluence.
The leftists have been planting these seeds in the minds of people in this country for years for decades.
What's scary is that for the first time, they now have an entire political party, the Democrat Party, advancing their agenda.
It used to be that they were considered wackos.
Environmentalist wackos, animal rights wackos, other kinds of extremists.
Guess what?
They are the Democrat Party today.
I read a piece over the weekend in the American Thinker, and I'm going to post this.
It's a long piece.
It prints out to six pages.
It's at the American thinker.
It's by Rocco DePippo.
And it is a history of this country from 2001 forward, 9-11 forward, little stuff prior to that, but it is excellent.
It's nothing that you don't know, it's nothing that you haven't felt, but it is on paper and it is done in such a way that your memory is inspired, called up, you remember all of these things.
Let me tell you how it starts.
In an America and I'm paraphrasing this.
In an America 30 years ago, 40 years ago.
Do you realize that a candidate such as Barack Obama would not last a week in the Democrat primary after it was learned that his preacher of 20 years hated America?
Twenty, thirty, forty years ago, Barack Obama would have been drummed out of the primaries by his own party and by the American people.
And if he had survived that, when we learned that his best buddies are terrorists and people who bombed the Pentagon and bombed the United States, and when we learn that he has the support and the the tacit endorsement of our enemies around the world.
He would be gone.
People would be outraged.
His political career would be over.
Today, he's their nominee.
How many of you last night watched this great discovery program called When We Left Earth?
Six hours, the first two were last night.
They have gotten to the cold storage vaults of NASA.
They have 500 hours of film.
Some of it's not before seen, most of it has been if you've known where to look.
Some of it's new, only that it hasn't been seen.
They remastered it in HD.
It started the first two episodes were last night.
I was alive during all this.
Much of it I remember all of it.
I remembered all of it.
I remembered every one of those Gemini launches.
I remembered the Mercury losses.
I remember Gus Grissom losing his space capsule he blew the hatch early on his Mercury flight.
What I had forgotten, even though I instinctively knew it, and what reminded, and I've been speaking about it recently, was how damn proud everybody in this country was, including the media of what we were doing with the Mann Space Program.
Be back after this.
Stay with us.
So I'm watching When We Left Earth last night on the Discovery Channel.
I, of course, as a powerful, influential member of the media, I'm watching it in high definition on my big screen.
And I can't pull myself away from it, even though I know it all, seen it.
But the things I had forgotten, a little, just how damn proud everybody in this country was and around the world.
And listening to commentary.
They went and interviewed media people at that time, Jay Barberi, NBC, who's their guy on the spot.
So excited, so proud.
NBC had a reporter at NASA that was so proud of what this country was doing.
Now I know it was an effort inspired by JFK, Democrat and so forth, but that that really didn't have much to do with it.
In the 60s, even during the Vietnam War, there were days we were proud of this country.
And the media led the way in many many areas.
True, there was a goal.
Get to the moon, and there was competition with the Russians.
We ought to have a goal today.
If we had elected leadership, we would have a goal today.
You know what the goal would be?
Drill here, drill now.
The goal would be to stop depending on people who don't have our best interests at heart for petroleum energy when we have our own.
We can do it.
We have elected leadership stopping us.
The aforementioned extremists, leftists, who have now taken over the Democrat Party, who want to punish this country if you doubt me when I say this.
What party was it that wanted to lose in Iraq and still does?
What country was it that waved the right flag as surrender and still does?
What co uh party was it that owns the defeat in Iraq if it happens, the Democrat Party.
What is the party that has lied to the American people repeatedly about circumstances involved?
It's not George W. Bush and weapons of mass destruction, it's not George W. Bush in intelligence, it's the Democrat Party which has been taken over by extreme leftists.
We have been taught over the years in this country to hate the following big oil, big pharmaceutical, big retail, big insurance, big health, virtually anything in the private sector.
We have been told to despise it because it's out to screw us, it is out to cheat us.
In the process, the American will, the American sense of pride, in the greatness and the traditions and the institutions, their own country has been broken down, to the point that people are distrustful.
They're distrustful of the things that have made and kept this country great.
The only thing we are told to love, the only thing we are told to trust, the place we are go, the place we are to go, and the place we are sent to get even for things that don't go right in our lives.
The government, the benevolent government, and the 545 dolts that run the place.
545 elected dolts, and the literally hundreds of thousands of unelected bureaucrats, who over the last seven years, with the tacit approval and support of both the Democrat Party and the drive-by media have sought to Undermine U.S. national interest at every possible turn.
Not only domestically, but across the oceans.
We are told to hate the auto industry.
The auto industry is destroying our planet, don't you see?
Big oil is cheating us and destroying the planet at the same time.
We're being told we're running out of time.
We're being told that we do not have the greatness to deal with these problems.
That our greatness is over.
That we are in a constant state of decline.
That we need to back up our expectations.
30 years ago, Barack Obama would be disqualified on the basis of one video of Jeremiah Wright.
God.
God damn America.
Screw you, buddy.
Nobody says that about our country.
You are finished.
Today.
We're told either to overlook it or try to understand his rage or even he really didn't mean that.
He's just saying that for the crowd.
I gotta run.
I'm out of time, but I'm not finished.
Ha!
The first hours in the can.
I have a little more to go on this, and I want to read you some excerpts from Rocco DePippo's piece, The Audacity of the Democrats, from the American Thinker on June 7th.
We'll get to that after this brief time out here at the top of the hour.
Don't go away, folks.
▲
Export Selection