All Episodes
Previous Next
May 21, 2008 - Rush Limbaugh Program
35:32
May 21, 2008, Wednesday, Hour #3
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
I take it back.
Instead of Soundbite 11 and in order 34 and 35 first.
And we'll go to Soundbite 11 and get an order of greetings.
Welcome back, folks.
Rush Limbaugh, the Excellence in Broadcasting Network.
We are here behind a golden EIB microphone, the prestigious and distinguished Limbaugh Institute for Advanced Conservative Studies.
Now these oil hearings going on the Senate Judiciary Committee.
What in the world is the Judiciary Committee doing conducting hearings of big oil executives?
I mean, if you haven't heard, they're demanding that the House overwhelmingly 300-plus votes today to sue OPEC.
And now Leahy and his cronies up there ripping into big oil executives.
Why don't they have a damn hearing with all the left-wing environmentalist wacko groups up there and have these groups defend themselves for all the litigation they bring preventing oil companies from drilling and refining and transporting oil and gas?
Why do we have any hearings on the decision to put the polar bear on the endangered species list?
And you know the sole reason for that?
The sole reason for putting the polar bear on the endangered list or whatever it is is to create more obstacles to drilling for oil in the Arctic Circle.
Why not drag Al Gore's butt up there?
Have him defend all the efforts he's made to drive up the cost of fuel with his idiot science.
Look at the price of gasoline skyrocketing, the price of food skyrocketing.
People, story on drudge, people are not altering their driving habits yet, but they are altering what they eat.
Now, I would think the environmentalist wackos would be dancing in the street here.
They're getting everything they want.
But I don't see the dancing.
Why not hold hearings on the individuals, the groups, and the forces that are limiting supply and driving up cost rather than these for show trial hearings on big oil?
The oil companies want to drill.
It's their business.
They want to refine.
They want to deliver their products to us.
All the rest of the people that I've mentioned don't want them to do it.
The people who need to be interviewed, the people who need to be interrogated, are those who are providing the obstacles to this.
At some point, if this keeps up, I am confident that enough people in this country are going to be outraged and demand that these obstacles be swept aside and that we start drilling for our own oil.
When everybody's talking about needing more oil, when everybody's talking about the Saudis need to pump more, OPEC needs to pump more, at some point the American people are going to say, why not our own?
It's going to happen if this keeps up.
We do have two soundbites here from the Shell oil CEO, John Hofmeister.
Here is response number one to Senator Leahy.
In the United States, access to our own oil and gas resources has been limited for the last 30 years, prohibiting companies such as Shell from exploring and developing resources for the benefit of the American people.
It is not a free market.
According to the Department of the Interior, 62% of all onshore federal lands are off-limits to oil and gas developments, with restrictions applying to 92% of all federal lands.
The Argonne National Laboratory did a report in 2004 that identified 40 specific federal policy areas that halt, limit, delay, or restrict natural gas projects.
The problem of access can be solved in this country by the same government that has prohibited it.
Congress could, if it chose, lift some or all of the current restrictions on exploration and production of oil and gas.
Congress could provide national policy to reverse the persistent decline of domestically secure natural resource development.
Amen.
This is great.
Firing back at Congress, telling them they are the problem.
That was John Hofmeister, who is the CEO of Shell Oil Company.
The Congress could have chosen to lift some or all of the current restrictions on exploration and production of oil and gas.
Congress could provide national policy to reverse the persistent decline of domestically secure natural resources.
We do not have a free market.
62% of all onshore federal lands are off-limits to oil and gas developments, with restrictions applying to 92% of all federal lands.
You want to know why there's an oil shortage in the United States?
It's not big oil.
It is these groups, left-wing environmentalist wacko groups, who have stood in the way.
And federal agencies like the Fish and Wildlife Service and the Department of the Interior, who by fiat proclaim various animals to be endangered for the express purpose of limiting oil production.
Now, there can be only one reason for this, and it has nothing to do with beautification, has nothing to do with potential oil spills, has nothing to do with any of that.
It has to do with attacking the largest capitalist economy on the face of the earth.
Make no mistake.
Here's a second soundbite from John Hofmeister.
There is simply no way to keep up, let alone get ahead of demand, except by producing more oil and building more refining capacity.
That's because of the makeup of the barrel of crude.
Only a third to a half of the barrel of crude oil can be used to make these products.
We can't use more than half of the barrel of oil to make diesel and aviation fuel.
To meet this demand, we need more capacity.
So we need policies that enable both more crude supply and more refining.
Higher taxes would only serve to diminish the expansion capacity of this critical capital investment.
I urge you on behalf of American consumers to resist such punitive policies.
Said that to Pat Leahy and other members of the Senate Judiciary Committee, John Housmeister, the president-CEO of Shell Oil.
Now, I did not finish going through all of the audio sound bites demonstrating angry women or illustrating how angry women are over what has happened to Mrs. Clinton.
Here's Gloria Allred.
She's on MSNBC yesterday, and the InfoBabe said to her, Gloria, you heard what Senator Clinton had to say.
Does that prove the case that Senator Obama is sexist?
I think overall, the coverage of Hillary Clinton as a candidate has been the most sexist, misogynistic that I have ever seen, and I have been involved in politics for more than 30 years, and I have never seen anything like it.
And I think all Hillary Clinton and her supporters would like is for her to be judged on her merits.
I don't believe that you would have male candidates, for example, being criticized by journalists for not getting out of the race when, in fact, this candidate, Hillary, has, if you look at it, more electoral votes, more electoral college votes, if you count the states that she won in, than Barack Obama does.
You wouldn't have journalists saying that a male candidate should get out of the race.
See, I'm telling you, there is outrage out there amongst the feminists and women who think they are being swept aside once again for an underqualified man.
Ms. Allred was then asked, Gloria, you even have some former Clinton supporters, people who supported her who have now said, listen, it's time to get out of the race.
Now, I know it's easy to point the finger at the media, but let's just look at some of the supporters who have now called on her to get out of the race, who were on her side at one point.
I'm not alone in thinking that there has been a lot of sexist and misogynistic coverage and double-standard coverage of the family.
I know you're not alive.
We're hearing that.
This afternoon, there's going to be a protest in Los Angeles by several women's groups over the kind of coverage that Hillary has received.
Yeah, knew this.
I called it.
This is the one place, the EIB network, that predicted this kind of outrage happening.
The point of this is not that these women are mad.
It is that there is nowhere near unity in this party.
And when these women in exit polls say they're not going to vote for Obama and that number keeps going up with every primary, you got to take it seriously.
Democrats do.
They live and die by polling.
Last night in Louisville, Mrs. Clinton spoke to supporters a portion of her remarks to fire up the sisters.
Tonight, I'm thinking about all of the women I've met who were born before women could vote.
Just this week, I met 89-year-old Emma Hollis, an African-American woman.
She has seen so many barriers crumble and fall in her lifetime, but she's not finished yet.
She's been volunteering out of our campaign office in Covington to help our campaign break the highest and hardest glass ceiling in the land.
Oh, yeah, the glass ceiling is back, 89-year-old Emma, whatever.
Mrs. Clinton firing up the sisters out there.
Did you hear Hillary's story about this little kid who sold his video games and his bicycle for $22 and some cents to give to her campaign?
They kept it.
Mrs. Clinton took it, and she's part of her regular campaign speech now to talk about how people are so into her campaign.
This little kid, I mean, it's like 10 or 12 years old, I think, went out and sold his video games and bicycle or some such for $22.10, something like that.
And here's Mrs. Clinton with a net worth of $150 million and her and her husband keeping the kids $22.
It's like those bake sales.
Back in 1993, all these little kids in high schools around the country having bake sales to reduce the national debt, sending the money to Clinton, and he kept it.
Sent it over to the Treasury or some such thing.
Long cool woman in the black dress, Holly's.
It'd be what, 1972, I believe.
The Prince of Wales, Prince Charles, has warned that the world faces a series of natural disasters within 18 months unless urgent action is taken to save the rainforests.
Hey, Prince Chuck, urgent action was taken to save the rainforest.
Your buddy, Harrison Ford over at Conn, filmed a PSA where he had his chest waxed, hair removed via wax and tape to illustrate deforestation.
When has the world not had natural disasters, Prince Chuck?
The Prince of Wales has warned that the world faces a series of natural disasters.
We have natural disasters every day on this planet.
And by the way, Prince Chuck, they're only disasters because people happen to live where they happen.
Lots of storms and a lot of stuff happen where they're not disasters because there's no people there.
I mean, look at all these giant snowfalls on the mountaintops.
You put that snowfall where people live, it'd be a disaster.
This stuff happens all the time.
It's a very volatile climate in place, our little planet.
What is it about people with big ears that makes them wacky?
Prince Charles has big ears.
Barack Obama's got big ears.
We can't talk about his big ears.
We can't talk about his wife now.
In addition, everything else, listen to this.
This Obama Monday a Good Morning America.
And Robin Roberts said, you know what's going on in Tennessee, the GOP there and their web campaign about taking the remarks you made earlier about being the first time in your adult life, being proud of the U.S. Should you get through this process and you have the general election ahead of you, this is what you're going to expect more and more.
Are you prepared for that?
If they think that they're going to try to make Michelle an issue in this campaign, they should be careful because that I find unacceptable.
The notion that you start attacking my wife or my family, for them to try to distort or to play snippets of her remarks in ways that are unflattering to her, I think is just low class.
These folks should lay off my way.
He's warning the good old boys in Tennessee to GOP, lay off his wife.
Now, his wife's out there making statements, making speeches, policy statements.
She's on the campaign trail telling women, don't go into corporate America, stay dirt poor in your present jobs, helping people change bedpans and stuff.
Don't do any of this.
She is, she is, what do you mean, unacceptable?
I'm talking about his wife.
I can't, I know.
Can't talk about his wife.
It's unacceptable.
Can't talk about his big ears.
Can't talk about his mother.
Can't talk about his father.
We can't talk about his grandmother unless he does.
But only he's allowed to bring her up as a typical white person.
We can't talk about his wife now.
We can't talk about that nutcase preacher.
We can't mention his middle name.
We can't talk about his terrorist friends.
We can't talk about his bomber friends.
We cannot talk about his voting record.
We can't talk about his religion.
We cannot talk about his buddies that shake people down in real estate.
We can't talk about appeasement.
We can't talk about color.
We can't talk about lack of color.
We can't talk about race.
We can't talk about bombers and mobsters who are his best friends.
We can't talk about schooling.
We can't talk about his name, Hussein.
We can't talk about his lack of experience.
We can't talk about his income.
We can't talk about his flagpin.
All these are distortions.
All these are distractions.
All of these are the politics of usual.
It all started out, we couldn't talk about his ears.
Now we can't say anything about the guy.
That's acceptable.
We can't say anything.
He is a Messiah.
And we can't say a word.
Now we've got to lay off his wife.
Okay, so if we can't talk about him, he can.
So we are going to illustrate some Obama gaffes and some Obama lies.
We're going to start with audio soundbite number 14.
This is yesterday in Miami.
Senator McCain speaking to Cuban Americans at a memorial for political prisoners.
He said this about Obama wanting to sit down with Cuban leaders.
He also wants to sit down unconditionally for a presidential meeting with Raul Castro.
An unconditional meeting with Raul Castro.
Last night in Des Moines, Iowa, Obama spoke to supporters.
I have never said that I was prepared to immediately normalize relations with Cuba.
John McCain keeps on making these statements that simply aren't based on anything I've said.
Really?
Well, let's go back to July 23rd, 2007, CNN's YouTube Democrat debate from the Citadel in Charleston, South Carolina.
A viewer named Stephen from California said, Would you be willing to meet separately without precondition during the first year of your administration at Washington or anywhere else with the leaders of Iran, Syria, Venezuela, Cuba, and North Korea in order to bridge the gap that divides our countries?
I would.
And the reason is this, that the notion that somehow not talking to countries is punishment to them, which has been the guiding diplomatic principle of this administration, is ridiculous.
Well, he lied.
I'm sorry.
He lied.
He said last night on CNN, I've never said I was prepared to immediately normalize relations with Cuba.
I never said that.
But that's not what McCain said.
What McCain said, he wants to sit down unconditionally for a presidential meeting, unconditional meeting with Castro.
Obama says, I never said I was prepared to immediately normalize relations.
That's not what McCain accused you of, Barry.
He said you wanted to sit down and meet with him.
And you said, no, you never did until you said you did back in a YouTube debate.
Cut 16 again, please, from the YouTube debate July 23rd, almost a year ago.
I would.
And the reason is this, that the notion that somehow not talking to countries is punishment to them, which has been the guiding diplomatic principle of this administration, is ridiculous.
And now, ladies and gentlemen, Bill Richardson this morning on Fox and Friends, Steve Docey says, when you were at the United Nations, you didn't think it was a good idea to talk to those guys, did you?
Well, you know, throughout my career, I've talked to a lot of bad guys.
You know, I have talked to Castro.
I think you don't talk to Ahmadinejad, you talk to some of the moderate clerics.
So, one of his primary endorsers, Bill Richardson, New Mexico, has just told Barack Obama, do not talk to Mahmoud Akhmadinezad.
And of course, Barack would say, well, I never said I would.
This is Clinton-esque.
Snerdley is shouting unacceptable every time I mention something about Obama because he's right, too.
We're not allowed to mention anything about Obama, especially his ears.
This is just too much.
This is hilarious.
This is from the Denver Post.
On May the 18th, it says three days ago.
Caterers for the Democrat National Convention finding the Democrats' eco-standards are tough to chew.
Fried foods are forbidden.
This is at the parties sponsored by the Denver 2008 Host Committee during the DNC this summer.
Fried foods are forbidden at the committee's 22 events.
Liquids served in individual plastic containers, bottled water not allowed.
Plates must be reusable, like China, recyclable or compostable.
The food should be local, organic, or both.
Caterers must provide foods in at least three of the following five colors, red, green, yellow, blue, purple, and white.
Garnish is not included.
This according to a request for proposals of the RFP distributed last week, the writer that comes along with all of this.
And the caterers out there going nuts.
Do they realize how much this is going to cost?
Going organic or local?
It's the dry season out here.
We're in the mountains for crying out loud.
It's the dry season out here.
Must be red, green, yellow, blue, purple, nothing fried, no bottled water that the Democrat National Convention.
Now, we have the bite of Mrs. Clinton talking about the kid and his video games.
I got the price from somebody told me it's $10 or $22.
It was $422 that the kid raised selling his stuff.
Here's Mrs. Clinton talking about it last night in Lul.
I'm thinking again about Dalton Hatfield, the 11-year-old from Kentucky who sold his bike and his video games to raise money to support my campaign.
And then he asked others to give to.
And he was able to really give me a boost.
And this week, I finally had the chance to meet him in Prestonburg.
And to say, Dalton, thank you so much.
The $422 you raised helped carry the day in Kentucky.
All right, we fleece 11-year-olds in a Clinton campaign.
11-year-olds sell everything their parents ever bought them.
Go out there, raise $422, and the Clintons keep it.
And then brag about it.
And then give the 11-year-old kid credit for the victory in Kentucky when we all know it was Operation Chaos.
But no, no, no, no.
I'm not jealous about this.
This is just what are these people.
What's her combined net worth?
$109 million or something like that?
I know she's in debt.
That's another thing.
She has borrowed money from herself.
She's lent her campaign money.
Now, I'm going to guarantee you something that these people, the Clintons, money, money, money.
It matters to them as much as anything does.
It's inseparable from power as far as they're concerned.
And she wouldn't be spending this kind of money if she thought it was just going down the drain with no hope.
She would not be spending this money if she didn't think it was going to pay off.
And I simply mention this to you to give you an idea of what's going on inside her head.
She has, in her mind, they're nowhere near defeat.
What's defeat?
It's not over yet.
We still have two primaries in this thing in Puerto Rico to go.
And we got the bylaws and rules committee on the 31st.
Then we got the convention.
Yeah.
Can you imagine?
Just imagine for the fun of this, if they get through a first ballot with nobody having enough delegates.
Oh, oh, my friends, what a show that would be.
If they get through the first ballot and nobody wins, then the super delegates, oh, it would just, it would just, that would be worth watching.
I mentioned earlier in the program that we have now succeeded in introducing a new term into the popular vernacular as we have introduced the term feminazi and uglo-American.
Now Hillary's testicle lockbox has made it into the popular vernacular.
Friday, hardball Chris Matthews talking with Michelle Bernard about the Democrat primary.
She's the president of the Independent Women's Voice.
And Matthews says, fickle nature of this campaign, 24 hours you have down in Washington.
What a difference it makes, you know, one day.
Whether the president was actually talking about Obama and the Democrats or not, it was a great gift.
It gave Obama the ability to go out on the offensive and start giving the American public what his foreign policy credentials are going to look like.
And that's something he needs to do.
We always have people talking about Hillary Clinton having this great testicular lockbox and she opens it and closes it and she's looking very powerful.
Testicular lockbox.
Yeah, Senate format.
I think it's very mixed up.
Where have you been?
Where have you been?
Matthews apparently has not heard of the testicle lockbox or the testicular lockbox.
Michelle Bernard, obviously a fan, the EIB network, introducing the term to Chris Matthews at HARP.
Well, that's one of the things he should know it because he's had experience with the testicle lockbox.
I mean, he made the statement that the only reason she got elected senator is because her husband cheated on her.
And then the Clinton campaign lowered the boom and lid on the testicle lockbox.
And Matthews had to apologize.
I mean, he's had experience with the thing and professes not to know anything about it.
David in McAllister, Oklahoma, I'm glad you waited, sir.
Welcome to the EIB network.
Hey, Rush, Megan, whole school ditto.
Thank you.
Rush, I sincerely want to thank you for the impact and the influence that you've had on my family and on my children, especially, and how you've helped them develop their critical thinking skills and how to look at these issues and how to cogently argue with people that they're dealing with on a daily basis about this.
You had a tremendous impact.
Thank you, sir, very much.
I appreciate that.
When I was listening to you talk to the superdelegates earlier, it occurred to me that they really don't mind taking the hit and standing up for Obama because even if he is unelectable and he does not win the election, as long as they continue to increase their majorities in the House and Senate, they have a willing accomplice and ally in John McCain, and he will further their agenda as much as Obama, except for the war.
And that's the only issue on which they differ.
Well, very good.
Very good, David.
Let me maneuver through this one.
You've just presented me a minefield here.
My pleasure.
Yeah, I don't think that the supers quite look at it that way, but they might, I'm sure that there is a certain degree of sediment on the Democrat side that they don't really lose with McCain winning for this reason.
Do you realize the way the polling data looks, the Republicans could put it this way?
The Democrats could have a 70-seat margin in the House and could have anywhere from 8 to 12-seat majority in the Senate.
So in that circumstance, let's say that's worst-case scenario.
And if the worst case scenario happens, it doesn't matter.
It doesn't matter who the president is.
The Democrats are going to carry.
In fact, I would suggest to you that Nancy Pelosi is already throwing down the gauntlet, saying that she's going to run that town no matter who wins the presidency.
She's traveling to Iraq while Bush is in Saudi Arabia.
She's laying down all of her markers.
And I think one of the reasons the Democrats might actually prefer Obama is because he is inexperienced.
He really doesn't know what he's doing.
And I think that the Democrats in Congress could pretty much roll a guy and get whatever they want out of him if indeed they have to.
And that's something that I think is pretty valid.
And in their worst case scenario, if McCain should win, they can always have a few rhinos like the Snows and others of this world come alongside them in case they needed a veto-proof majority.
Yeah, but look at they want the White House.
You've got to understand.
So these people have wanted the White House.
I mean, they've wanted it since 2000, but the Florida aftermath, I don't think people to this day understand just what a grudge they are holding over that.
They want the White House back in the worst way.
The Supers have a problem.
They've got two flawed candidates.
McCain can beat either of these two.
He can beat Obama the easiest.
Obama would be the easier of the two to beat.
Obviously.
And that's not even arguable.
But regardless, he could probably beat both these two.
But what good is it going to be with a 70-seat majority in the House?
I was at dinner on, what was it, Monday night?
And it was fascinating.
We're at a restaurant full of people.
And people left me alone.
We're at a table for 12 people.
People left me alone.
But when I got up to walk out, man, that's what everybody diverged.
Hey, can you come over here, sign this, take a picture here?
Who do you think the vice president's going to be?
Who do you think McCain's going to pick?
And I was talking to this group of people at one table, and I said, I just give them some names to sex.
I have no clue.
I mean, the top-tier names change every day.
Nobody knows.
He's not even started thinking about it seriously yet.
And then I have to, I said, is it going to matter?
None of it's going to matter.
I said, if the Republicans lose enough, if the Democrats have their 70-seat majority in the House and an 8 to 12-seat majority in the Senate, I mean, McCain could nominate Jesus Christ and the Democrats would turn him down.
And some group in the corner heard me.
Some Obama people in the corner said, Jesus Christ is dead.
I said, no, he's not.
He rose from the dead.
Shut them up.
But the, you know, seriously, folks, you have an eight, let's just say seven-seat majority in the Senate, seven seats, Democrats, seven-seat majority.
Here comes time to appoint a Supreme Court justice.
Take the best one out there.
Doesn't have a prayer.
If by best we mean a Bork or a Scalia or a Clarence Thomas or John Roberts, doesn't have a chance.
Does not have a prayer.
Because the Democrats can easily find three liberal Republicans.
You just mentioned it, the Olympia Snows and the Susan Collins and so forth.
Chuck Hagel's going to be gone.
Link Chafee's going to be gone.
But I mean, you know, who?
Yeah, Chaffee's gone.
Yeah, Chafee's gone.
He was gone when he was there.
He was worthless as teats on a boar hog when he was there.
Anyway, that's a little Missouri farm lingo back in this.
I got an email though today from the North Carolina mistress.
She's the one that got the Renaissance tankless water heater installed and got rid of the big tank and was able to remodel a kitchen.
So she rented this beach cottage somewhere up in North Carolina.
And apparently it's a pretty big beach, got six and a half bathrooms and a lot of bedrooms and so forth.
And she went and took a shower.
She ran out of hot water.
There's a lot of people in the beach house.
She's spoiled with her Renai tankless water heater.
Ran out of hot water.
I mean, it hasn't been in the shower very long at all, she said.
So she recommended to the owner of the beach house, the Renaissance tankless water heater, and the guy's going to look into it.
Because you never ever run out of hot water and you never spend any money heating hot water up that you're never going to use because you're not going to have a tank.
You're going to have a tankless water heater or maybe a couple, depending on the size of your estate.
Whatever it takes.
It's amazing.
You can see how this works at foreverhotwater.com.
That's the website, foreverhotwater.com.
It saves energy, saves money, and it cannot burst.
It cannot explode like your tank is just waiting to explode on you.
And a Renaissance tankless water heater will last over 20 years, and it will never, ever run out of hot water.
Dishwasher, washing machine, somebody washing the car with hot water, whatever, and your shower, it'll all be there for as long as you need it every place.
Renai Tankless Water Heaters at foreverhotwater.com.
Gerald in Milton, Delaware.
Welcome to the program, sir.
Nice to have you here.
Thank you for taking my call, Rush.
How are you, sir?
Fine, sir.
Thanks very much.
This is more a comment.
I guess an observation is about the oil situation.
And I feel very strongly about this, and that's simply this.
This is a resilient country.
I think the majority of the people in this country are pretty sane.
We've always proven in the past that we will get behind an effort if we have to overcome an obstacle.
We're facing probably one of the greatest obstacles in the history of this country, and that's the energy problem.
And all we need is some leadership stepping up to the plate and telling us that we're in trouble and we've got to deal with it.
You know, I, like you, I'm confident in this area.
I do think that in other policy areas, for example, there is a large and sizable moron vote that we are all subjected to.
People that just don't care.
You know, they're not spending enough time.
They vote on things that you and I would never think of voting on.
You know, hair color, wife, wardrobe, you know, this sort of thing.
Whether a guy can communicate, he sounds nice, looks like he cares, and all that esoteric stuff.
But everybody, even morons, know how expensive energy is getting.
Yep.
And even morons, who normally would be sucked into the usual liberal explanation, are going to someday get fit to be tied over this and demand to know why, and they're going to want to go further than just big oils gouging them.
I don't think that's the case.
I think the bottom line is.
No, I don't think big oil is.
That's what they've been told now.
They're going to get past that, and they're going to figure out.
And they're only morons because they're not paying attention.
They're going to start paying attention.
They're going to figure out here that there's all kinds of energy in this country that people aren't letting us go get.
Basic Economics 101.
Yep.
So you think it's an economic war?
Who are the combatants in the war?
OPEC.
Who else?
They got 80% of it.
You know, it's like I told your screener.
You know, maybe some people don't want to hear this, but as far as I'm concerned, we're in World War IV.
We're in economic war for our lives.
And that, I think, people have to wake up and realize OPEC right now feels they don't owe us nothing.
You think?
Let me just straight yes or no here.
I got 25 seconds.
They don't owe us anything.
No, no, no.
I have a question for you.
Do you think OPEC, the Saudis, the United Arab Emirates, Qatar, all these places, do you think they have singled us out for destruction via economics?
Yes.
There is no question in my mind because they can't do it any other way.
Yeah, but what's in it for them if they destroy us economically?
Well, the ironic thing about it is that you drive us into the ground, cause bankruptcy.
They come in with their retro colours.
Even the morons in this country are not going to put up with that at some point.
Your faith in the country is well placed.
Be right back.
Stay with us.
This, too, one of the first songs ever played on the radio.
Thank the Lord for the ninety time Neil Diamond, 1967.
We're out of here, folks.
Great to be back.
See you tomorrow.
Ready to do it all over again.
▲
Export Selection