All Episodes
Previous Next
May 9, 2008 - Rush Limbaugh Program
35:57
May 9, 2008, Friday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
The views expressed by the host on this program make more sense than anything anybody else out there happens to be saying.
And that's because we are oriented toward finding the truth, a daily relentless, unstoppable pursuit of the truth.
We find it.
We declare it.
You need courage to listen to this program and face the truth, because if you can't, you'll go bonkers.
Live from the Southern Command in sunny South Florida.
It's open line Friday.
And you know the rules and open line Friday.
Whatever you wish to discuss, feel free, ladies and gentlemen.
Monday through Thursday.
This program is about what I care about, what interests me.
On Thursday and Friday, rather, we open it up.
And whatever you wish to discuss or ask about is fair game.
It's a golden opportunity, folks, for you.
I mean, because everybody thinks they can do this better than I can.
This is a day for you to show it.
800 two hair to try, anyway, 800.
Snerdly's rolling his eyes.
Just made his job more difficult today.
Is that what you're rolling your eyes about?
800 282-2882, if you want to be on the program.
Uh email address L Rushbow at EIB net.com.
Bill Clinton in Fayetteville, West Virginia, yesterday, got into an argument with a member of the audience.
The audience member is an Obama supporter named Ruth Calibra.
And the argument that we we joined the argument in progress here.
It is an argument over claims made by Hillary Clinton that she improved health care during Bill's administration.
Are you waiting wait a minute, ma'am?
We had rallies all over this country.
She worked 40 for the elections.
No, you're wrong.
You're wrong.
Wait a minute.
I can't believe you're saying this.
There are millions of pages of documents that we have released showing the exhausting work that was done, the tens of thousands of people who were consulted, the rallies and movements we had all over the country.
Now, wait a minute, I'll listen to you.
You interrupted my speech.
You let me talk, will you?
You interrupt my speech.
You ever write up my speech.
Oh, it's just so there's nobody in America that's got more credibility.
And for you or any other person to claim she didn't work on it, it's the craziest thing I ever heard.
But us opposing her doubts that we worked our hearts out.
And let me just give you another example.
The other day we were in South Texas, or Hillary was, and all the doctors asked to meet with her.
This is amazing because you remember, I don't know, it was not that long ago, a month, maybe six weeks.
Clinton was out there saying she had nothing to do with health care because everybody was talking about how nothing got done.
And health care was responsible for losing the house.
One of the reasons why.
And so he took the blame for it.
Clinton was out there trying to be chivalrous.
What are you doing with your hair?
You are distracting me.
You've got rubber bands, you're putting hair braids in there.
What are you doing?
Pulling on your hair.
What are you doing?
Is it all tangled up?
Well, put it up during commercial break for crying out loud.
I'm looking like you look like you're trying to yank your hair out in there.
I'm in the middle of trying to do broadcast excellence.
Interrupting the monologue here, just like this Obama supporter interrupted Clinton talking about how his wife did everything on health care.
Anyway, Clinton's out there saying, uh, look at I gotta tell you the truth about this.
She didn't do anything on health care.
That was my doing.
I'm the one that bot looks down.
He was trying to be chivalrous.
So now this Obama supporter comes up and challenges it.
He's out there singing her praise of all she did for health care.
He's talking about all that exhausting work.
We had rallies and meetings all over the country.
That's the bus trip.
And we shut that down.
We shut this with the health care express or something like that.
It started out in Seattle, and there's a whole bunch of buses with Hillary on them.
And we got advanced notice where those buses were headed.
They think we tampered with this election.
We destroyed the health care express back in 1993.
We kept, I mean, we they had to take detours.
They had to take detours and skip some of the little towns they were going to because we had people lining up waiting for them.
The buses to pull in and the booze would start as soon as the doors opened.
Uh it was a hoot.
People have forgotten all this.
So they find that a drive-by is caught up with the woman that was arguing with Clinton in Fayetteville, West Virginia.
The name is uh uh Ruth Calibra, and here's a part of that exchange.
I talked about health care, and I said that I remember, okay, that she campaigned like crazy for health care.
She went into the White House two weeks after that, she never emerged and worked for health care.
He tried to deny that, okay.
But I remember that.
What'd you think when he said that that was crazy?
Well, of course he was going to say that.
So, but I remember it for a fact.
Okay, so I don't know what else to say about it, okay?
Is that they promised and they didn't deliver.
So her complaint is that they're trying to take credit for caring about people with health care and so forth, but it was the whole thing was botched, no matter who did it or who's taking credit for it.
And uh, you know, she was trying to say to Clinton during his speech, you guys didn't get anything done.
Hillary got nothing done.
She went in there and got nothing done.
Now Clinton a month ago agreed with that.
It was hidden that didn't get anything done.
But now he said the hundreds of thousands of people in documents and meetings and rallies, is what we did everything.
We shut up now.
I've I've I've I've done this in my speech.
So anyway, just it's just the Clinton's never had this happen to them.
They never had infiltrators get in their press conferences or their campaign events or hearings.
Now, Obama, Obama has thrown down the gauntlet.
Last night CNN situation remote is on with Wolf Blitzer.
And Blitzer says, McCain says this, for example.
I think it's very clear who Hamas wants to be the next president of the United States.
I think that people should understand that I will be Hamas' worst nightmare.
Senator Obama is favored by Hamas.
I think people can make judgments accordingly.
This is offensive.
And I think it's it's disappointing because John McCain always says, Well, I'm not going to run that kind of politics.
And then to engage in that kind of uh, you know, smear, I think, is is unfortunate, particularly since my policy towards Hamas has been no different than his.
For him to toss out comments like that.
I think is an example of him losing his bearings as he pursues this nomination.
Who do you know how to translate that, ladies and gentlemen?
Do you know what losing his bearings means?
It means he's an old codger who is nuts, maybe on the verge of senility.
That's how you translate that.
But here's the truth of this.
Because I, ladies and gentlemen, want to come to the defense of Senator McCain.
Limboy, no, no, don't do it.
Don't come to my defense.
It'll hurt me.
I have to, Senator.
I have to.
Because the Hamas guys did say that they would love to see Obama be elected president, that it would remind them of JFK, that Obama reminded him of JFK, and Obama accepted the compliment.
This is what we were talking about in the previous hour.
So Obama has accepted the praise from the Hamas leader, thanked him for it.
McCain simply says, Wow, that's pretty good.
I'll comment on that.
Uh very clear who Hamas wants to be the next president.
Obama comes along and totally smears McCain for engaging in dirty politics.
Now, this this is precisely the point, this is this isn't this is how Messiahs operate.
Messiahs can say and do whatever they want if you call them on what they've said, or if you remind people of what they've said.
Yesterday, the definition of a of an attack on a Democrat is to tell the truth about them.
The drive-by's, the media, the Democrats have defined attacks on Democrats as telling the truth about us.
That's all McCain did here.
He simply told, so it's okay.
It's okay for Obama.
In fact, it's okay for Hamas to say they love Obama.
It's okay for Obama to say thanks to Hamas.
It's not okay for McCain to point it out.
When McCain points it out, he becomes an old guy losing his bearings, and uh and he said he wasn't gonna campaign like this, said he wasn't going to uh engage in this kind of politics.
I am so sad to see Senator McCain losing his bearings like this.
And of course, McCain's sitting out there probably head spinning, you know, trying to figure out, you know, how to deal with this.
Because in all of this, McCain thinks he's running an honorable Campaign.
Uh so he's doing he's running an honorable campaign.
Here's Obama calling him an old fogey that doesn't know which way is which, uh, and and saying he's engaged in smear politics, which is the way the Democrats have defined it.
I did, I know.
I warned them.
I told him at Cain Camp yesterday, and I've told a number of times they have no clue what's coming their way.
They really don't.
This and this is nothing.
This is zilch compared to what's going to be fired at McCain once we get to the uh to the general brief time out here, folks.
Uh phone calls next to lots of other stuff on tap today as open line Friday continues after this.
You know this uh this business here that Obama says of McCain, hey, that's that's gutter politics, that's smear politics.
I can't believe he's lost his bearings to the point that he would say that about me and Hamas, when in fact it was David Axelrod, his campaign guy, who thanked Hamas, supported Hamas for their endorsement of uh of Obama, and talked about uh how appreciative they were and perceptive Hamas was that Obama reminds them of JFK in 1960.
Of course, there's no comparison whatsoever.
Uh JFK had tons more experience than Obama has at this stage of his career, but it's no different.
The whole thing's no different than his middle name.
Can't say Hussein, can't say Barack Hussein Obama.
He doesn't want that middle name mentioned, and so we're not supposed to do that.
And we can't call him a liberal.
No, no, no, no, not supposed to call Obama liberal.
That's an attack.
Using his middle name as an attack, and now reminding people of the Hamas endorsement.
Why that's an attack.
That's dirty politics.
And this is how Messiahs operate.
Everything's off limits.
The Messiah can say whatever he wants, do whatever he wants, go wherever he wants.
See whoever he wants.
You comment on anything he's done, said, been, or seen, and you are engaging in dirty politics.
And the drive-by's right there to support him on it because they're in the tank for him.
Back to the phones, Mike in Atlanta.
Glad you called, sir.
Welcome to the EIB network.
Hello.
Thank you for taking my call, Rush.
Greetings from the peach state.
Uh Rush, you were talking earlier about the uh month of April last month, uh the average temperature being the coldest uh on record in 114 years, you know, the 29th coldest in 114 years.
It it made me wonder, and and now as I've waited to talk to you, it's it's actually gotten me worried.
What are the dire predictions for global cooling?
There are no dire predictions for global cooling, and in fact, uh the objective of global warming and the objective of the global warming monikers is to stop the warming, and that is to cause cooling.
And of course, this is ostensibly it's supposed to be good.
Uh, but there there are nothing negative here about global cooling whatsoever, other than perhaps a new ice age.
Well, that was my concern.
Are we headed toward an ice age now?
Who knows?
There are a lot of people who think that we're headed for a mini ice age, that we're headed for a profound period of cooling, and in fact, you know, even the global warming believers, all these these scientists involved in their consensus supporting the hoax.
I mentioned this the other day, just to remind you.
They found something.
They found currents in both the Atlantic and the Pacific, which are going to cool the planet for the next 10 to 12 years, and delay the onset of global warming.
But after that, after these 10 to 12 years look out because it's gonna start sizzling again.
Now, they couldn't explain why all of a sudden this unstoppable warming is gonna be arrested for 10 to 12 years.
They chalked it up to natural climate variations.
And of course, these are ocean currents, thinking one of them is La Niña.
I don't know what it is in the Atlantic, but they're concerned.
I'm telling you, some of the some of the pro-global warming people, they're looking at their little models.
They're not even looking at models in this case, they're looking at actuals.
They can see these temperatures the same as you and I. And so they've got to do something.
Because it's not gonna do what they say it's gonna do in the next 10 years, which is why they're very cagey and smart, talk about the next 50 years, next 60 years.
None of us are gonna be alive to see whether these people are right or not.
But they still want us to engage in policies that would wreck this economy in order to fix something that isn't happening.
So now this cooling has come along, oops, well, natural variations.
Natural climate variations.
Now, isn't that interesting?
If natural climate variation now, I know, folks, I know this is common sense to you and me.
Because you and me, you and I, we we know that all these climate occurrences are natural.
And not one of them's artificial.
So, meaning we're not causing it.
We couldn't cause it if we wanted to.
Is the can we make it cooler when it's burning hot out there?
Can we make it warmer?
When we're freezing our tushes in the wind, we can't do this.
So there are natural climate variations that are cooling the planet right now.
This is the Earth taking care of what man is doing to her.
Well, if there are natural climate variations that can cool the planet, why can't there be natural climate variations that warm the planet?
Well, obviously there can be.
Now I had an interview with our official climatologist Roy Spencer on the phone on Tuesday afternoon for the upcoming issue of the Limbaugh Letter.
By the way, the upcoming issue of the Limbaughter is about oil, and it is a brilliant, brilliant issue.
And it's it'll be it'll be next months.
But in talking Dr. Spencer, I said, Dr. Spencer, I you know, I asked him, you know, he's a scientist, used to be at NASA, now he's University of Huntsville, Alabama, or Alabama and Huntsville.
And I said, what's the best your man of science?
What what what's what's the best way to combat this in terms of changing the minds and hearts of the American people?
His first answer to me was I don't think we're gonna have to do anything.
I think the next seven to ten years are going to show that we're not warming and in fact maybe cooling, and uh the global warming crowd is going to be discredited in and of itself.
And I said, Well, that's nice if that happens, but I don't think they're going to allow that to happen.
I think they're going to portray anything that happens in climate as a result of global warming.
And they're going to say these next ten to twelve years of cooling are simply the earth compensating for the attempt to destroy the planet by man.
But at some point the earth will lose the competition between nature and man.
And then I said, Dr. Spencer, I want to illustrate something for you.
Take Stephen Hawking.
Listen, the smartest man on the planet, whoever it is, let's just say it's Stephen Hawking, okay?
And let's take Stephen Hawking off the Earth.
Let's put him somewhere else in the universe.
And there is no Earth.
And we say this to uh uh Dr. Hawking, Dr. Hawking, I want you to create the climate of the planet Earth that God is going to create.
I want you to put all of the systems in it.
I want you to account for all the complexity.
I want you to populate it.
And Dr. Spencer said, well, it's a good illustration, it's impossible.
But precisely it's impossible.
There's not a human being alive who, if given a chalkboard or a computer, could sit down and put together the mathematics and whatever else is necessary to create this climate.
So on that basis, on what basis do the hell we think we can change it?
So much of this is just common sense, but to understand the global warming hoax, I am convinced one has to have a more than rudimentary understanding of liberalism.
One has to be willing open-mindedly to accept that science has been corrupted by politics.
Science is not pure.
We've always thought that it was.
We've always thought that science was immune to political and ideological concerns, but it isn't.
In fact, science is now become, quote unquote science, has become a home for displaced socialists and communists to advance their agenda of anti-capitalism wherever they can.
A lot of people don't want to believe that.
See, I try to approach it on the common sense basis.
Oh, yeah, we can destroy the planet, right?
Driving our cars.
Have you seen the pictures of this volcano eruption?
Where was this?
Where did this volcano erupt?
Chile.
You know what in Chile, have you seen the pictures of this volcano?
Have you seen the amount of ash that was spewed in to the sky from this volcano?
I have to take a break.
I'm gonna make my point we come back after an obscene profit timeout.
Don't go away.
A man, a living legend, a way of life.
Learn it, love it, live it, Rush Limbaugh with talent on loan from a God on open line Friday.
On the 7th of May, a couple of days ago, the UK Daily Mail published some color pictures of the aftermath of the eruption of the volcano in southern Chile.
Now I think this eruption was the first in a hundred years or some such thing.
These pictures are amazing.
And I'm not talking about just the pictures of the ash.
But I want to I I want to have I want to have Coco go get this story, put it on the website later tonight when we update to reflect the contents of today's program so you can see these pictures.
Let me just I wish I could describe them.
I've never seen anything like this.
The amount of ash that was spewed into the atmosphere would dwarf the amount of pollution the United States automobile industry has created since the invention of the automobile.
And I say this in the in the context of there is not a human being on this planet who could be teleported somewhere else in the universe, earth wiped out, and this smart human being, okay, recreate it.
Here's your chalkboard, here's your computer, here's the software, you go, you go design just the climate.
I'll handle everything else, God says.
You just you do the climate.
I'm I folks, there is not enough knowledge, there is not enough understanding.
It could not be done.
And of course, this is obvious.
I'm not trying to be profound here.
The reason I bring it up is there is no way on earth we could create this.
There isn't a way we can change it.
We can adapt, and see, this is the key.
Every living thing adapts to its environment in order to survive.
Take human beings, for example.
We don't do well without clothes.
Right?
Especially when it gets cold.
Well, in certain circumstances, yeah, clothes come off.
But I mean, talk just normal everyday running around activities.
You live in Minnesota in the wintertime, you need clothes.
All right, where do you get them?
You have to adapt, right?
I mean, you don't the clothing store just didn't spring up there.
It's not part of God's creation, is it?
Well, yes, it is, but no, the fabrics, the leathers, the shoes.
Where'd those things come from?
Other living things.
We had to kill them.
For our own survival is called adapting.
Um a beaver.
The rodent beaver destroys talk talk to anybody who's had problems with beavers in the backyard or wherever they have problems with them.
They gum up to work because they build dams, they screw everything up.
They're adapting.
They're just trying to survive.
Cockroaches?
You hate them, they're underneath your sink.
Spramers like the Clintons, not even nuclear war could get rid of them.
They survive by adapting.
Every living thing adapts.
Okay, so when the colonists first arrived, and we got things going over 13 colonies.
But there was a whole country out there that the injuns were in charge of, supposedly at one with nature, wiping out the buffalo, smoking a peace pipe, uh at war with each other's nations.
Who knows whatever else they were doing out there?
But they too, at one with nature?
What do you think a TP was made out of?
I mean, they had to do something.
Had to cut Trees for fires.
Stay warm in the winter.
Everybody adapts.
Now, we as human beings, blessed with a superior intelligence, have the understanding, the knowledge to be stewards over this, because we need to continue to have these items that we alter for our survival as our population grows.
For example, trees.
The most beautiful thing you do with the tree is after you chop the thing down.
You build a house out of it.
You build a baseball bat.
You build a gorgeous Steinway piano.
Broomstick.
Any number of things.
But guess what?
As the population grows and prosperity increases, you're going to need more broomsticks.
Gonna need more houses.
You're gonna need more of everything.
So you replant the trees.
For every tree you cut down, plant ten for one.
We're not destroying anything, but we're adapting.
It happens throughout life.
Everything in life adapts.
If it doesn't adapt, it won't survive.
But the beaver doesn't care what it destroys.
Because it doesn't have the ability to know.
Nothing, no other living organism has the slightest idea.
The cuckoo bird.
Cuckoo bird's so damn lazy it won't even build its own nest.
It lays its eggs in the nests of others.
And then flies off into hell with the babies.
Going out and making more eggs, you know how they do that.
The point is we all have to adapt.
The people in Chile, they didn't cause the volcano.
They're gonna have to adapt.
They're gonna have to move, they have to do something because they can't stop the volcano.
So, to tie all this together, this ash, this stuff that was belched out of that volcano in Chile, has more pollution.
You wait and see what the cooling effect of this cloud of ash is gonna cause wherever it ends up on this planet, wherever it hovers.
It's Mount Pinatubo did the same thing.
Mount Penatubo, when that was in the Philippines when that thing blew up.
The Earth's temperature was cooled for a long time, a long number of years.
Of course, the environmentalist Michael says, well, yes, well, that was that was simply Mother Nature responding to the destructive efforts of man.
BS, the hurricane amount of the Mount Pinatubo volcano, nor this thing in Chile has any idea what man is or where man is or what man's doing.
It doesn't have a mind of its own.
So we can't create any of this.
We couldn't if we were given all the ingredients.
We couldn't do it.
We couldn't put it together.
If God said, here is everything I did to make your climate.
Now you put it together so it works.
No clue.
We couldn't do it.
We'll never be able to do it.
And yet, we have the vanity and the audacity of hope to think that we can change it, roll it back and stop it, and then out of the clear blue, I'll take it in 1984.
I'm watching in Sacramento, I'm watching TV this week with David Brinkley.
Some guy named OpenAM, I've told you this story before.
A couple global warming scientists on there, and they're just sounding the death knell for the planet.
We only got 20 years, they said.
We can't prove our contention that man-made global warming is happening, but we think it is, but we can't afford to wait.
Twenty years is all we got.
If we don't take action now, it's gonna be too late.
1984, it's twenty-four years later, right?
And they're still saying the same thing, and we just had the coldest April in 119 years.
The planet has not warmed in the last seven years.
They just told us that there's gonna be a natural cooling cycle because ocean currents in the Atlantic and Pacific is gonna delay global warming for 10 to 12 years.
I mean, it's gonna get cooler.
And now this hurricane, pardon this volcano's blown up down there in Chile.
You ought to see the pictures.
We're gonna post them.
Let me give you the caption to one of these pictures.
It, you know, one of the things I like living about Florida, particularly in the summertime.
You go out at night, it's hot.
It's humid.
And you go out there on your deck, and it's dark.
Crystal clear where we live, but way out over the ocean at high altitude is the most beautiful electrical Thunderstorm.
And sometimes far enough far enough away you can't hear the thunder, but you can see the clouds light up.
And you just sit there in wonder and amazement.
And you sip your adult beverage while sweating yourself silly, and it's a little breeze coming off the ocean, and it's just gorgeous.
And you remember what your father told you about thunderstorms.
If there's more power in one thunderstorm, one lightning bolt, we can harness it.
We could provide electricity for New York for a year.
Big lightning, big thunderstorm.
We don't know how to harness it because we know how to create it.
And when these thunderstorms are coming and a lightning's raining, it we can't stop it.
Maybe put some lightning arresters on, but that's it.
I have never seen an electrical thunderstorm out over the ocean, like I see in these pictures.
This astonishing picture shows the volcano in Chile erupting during storms in the middle of the night.
The electrical storms that they were having, the volcano went up.
The volcano caused even more electricity, more lightning.
As clouds of toxic ash and dust tower into the sky, they ionize the air, generating an explosive electrical storm.
Colossal forks of lightning spark around the noxious plume as it spews from the volcano's crater, creating an image of raw, terrifying energy as if the air itself were ablaze.
Daily Mail, UK Daily Mail from May the 7th, we'll get this posted.
There's two of these pictures that illustrate this effect, and then there are just a bunch of them that show the amount of ash and how thick the cloud is.
So next next next next time you hear.
And by the way, one other observation.
For those of you buying into this silly, compact, fluorescent light bulb scheme.
When you look at these pictures from the UK Daily Mail, I want you to try to convince yourself that the type of light bulb you matter, you use matters a hill of beans to anything.
When you look at the raw power, I want you to, and then I after you do that, after you ask yourself, after you tell yourself how worthless, how irrelevant I should say, the kind of light bulb you use is.
I then want to ask you, are you one of these people that's bought into this silly notion to unplug your toaster and all of your electronic appliances when you're not using them?
You might want to do that, save electricity, that's fine.
But if you're doing it to save the planet, I want you to take a look at these pictures and ask yourself if unplugging your sunbeam toaster, your Mr. Coffee, your cell phone charger will matter a hill of beans.
To the climate of this planet.
And if you answer yes, you have a serious vanity problem.
Or worse, your life is meaningless, and you'll be talked into any scheme or hoax to believe in in order to make you think your life has a purpose, such as saving the planet.
You're simply helping a bunch of socialists tear down the greatest capitalist system on the face of the planet if you go along with this rot gut garbage.
Welcome back, Rush Limbaugh, open line Friday.
Uh, here's another little story for you.
This is from the American thinker, Bill Tate.
Has big media global warming bias begun to endanger the public?
Damn, good question.
When Maine officials tried to warn residents of the dangers of this winter's near record snowpack, big media slanted the story, hampering efforts to warn people of the danger.
This winter's near record snowfall has created a flood potential.
It's above normal, began a news advisory released by the Maine River Flow Advisor Commission on March 6th.
Statewide water content readings from this week's snow survey are some of the highest since 1969, the snow season of record, and in some locations higher than the record.
In case there was any doubt, the banner headline on the release says spring flood potential elevated due to near record snowfall.
However, the lead in the Associated Press Story in the next day's edition of the major regional daily, the Boston Globe, downplayed the threat posed by the snowpack, referring to it as just above average and shifting the emphasis to concern about an approaching storm.
The National Weather Service says weekend rain could cause some flooding of streets and small streams.
Now the story does eventually reference near record snowfall in the 13th graph of a 17-paragraph story with a spin that turned the main officials' warning on its head.
Now the Boston Globe is owned by the New York Times Company.
Both the Times and the AP are heavily invested in the myth of global warming.
And that record snowpack means higher than normal amounts of snow, colder than usual temperatures, or both, none of which readily fits into the drive-by chosen storyline that mankind is giving Mother Nature a thief a fever.
Big media's global warning bias has largely remained the realm of theory.
Now it has begun to endanger people's lives and property in real time.
The AP in the Boston Globe had the choice of reporting a truly inconvenient truth for them.
Or of perpetual global warming or facilitating officials' effort to protect the public or advancing their agenda.
Why are we not supposed surprised by the decision that they made?
And that it's a it's a valid question.
How many times have you seen all these outrageously extreme kook predictions of all kinds of destruction reported seriously by the uh by the drive-by media.
Anyway, to the phones.
Angela in uh in El Paso, Texas.
Glad you called.
Welcome to the program.
Hello.
Hello.
Hi, Rice.
I was calling because um earlier your caller from Miami, you commented to her that you thought liberal you best you liberal you brush prevented liberals from believing conservatives are right.
And I actually, over the last few years, as I've watched them in action, I think you're wrong.
I disagree.
I think that they're there's a little voice in the back of their heads that's telling them conservatives are right.
I think they're mad that we have such confidence and that we can back up our confidence with historical successes when conservative policies are followed, and they simply can't back it up.
They don't have the six the historical successes to back up the policies they want to put forth.
Um, you know, I understand that.
And I a lot of people think that deep down in their hearts, liberals know we're right.
I don't I I I I'm not I'm not sure of that because I I don't think, you know, we the best way to explain this is liberals do not use their minds.
Uh there's no logical progression to liberalism.
If there were logic involved, it would not exist.
Uh liberalism is born of pure emotion.
It's born of people's insecurities, and their lives having no meaning.
And the purpose of liberalism is to tell themselves that they're good people.
Uh, they can all they have to do is say something or feel something, and they consider themselves to be better people than anybody else.
They are arrogant, they are condescending when Barack Obama talks about the bitter clingers.
He's simply echoing what's taught to kids in the classrooms in this country, particularly on colleges and university campus.
I think, you know, I saw a story today, CNN was running it in with a special investigative unit.
North Korean kids taught to hate the USA.
I said, so?
What's what's what's unique about that?
That's happening right here in the United States.
Kids are being taught.
Look how you want a good example.
How many kids have been forced to watch Gore's movie?
What's the result of that movie?
People, kids, students get mad at this country.
We are destroying the planet and a polar bear and the penguins and everything else that's out there.
The idea that that uh the hatred for the USA is is not taught in this country is absurd.
And I think I think there's an arrogance, a condescension among people like Obama and his university buddies.
They are better than anybody else.
They are smarter than everybody else.
And I don't think for the I don't think for a moment they think that we are right.
They are afraid of us.
No question.
All right, that's it, folks.
But that's not it.
That's it for this hour.
But there's another exciting hour of open line Friday coming up right after our break here at the uh top of the hour.
More global warming stuff in your phone calls about whatever you want to talk about.
See in just a sec.
▲
Export Selection