All Episodes
Previous Next
April 2, 2008 - Rush Limbaugh Program
33:23
April 2, 2008, Wednesday, Hour #3
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Greetings.
Welcome back, Rush Limbaugh, the Excellence in Broadcasting Network, and the fastest three hours in media.
Great to have you with us today.
Telephone number, if you want to be on the program, is 800-282-2882.
The email address is illrushbow at eibnet.com.
We're going to move on now to Operation Chaos and the current status of the operation as it affects the Democrat Party.
Los Angeles Times today, Howard Dean says superdelegates are free agents.
It's a huge development in Operation Chaos.
Citing Democrat rules, Howard Dean yesterday said that the superdelegates who are poised to select the party's presidential nominee are free to back whoever they wish at the end of the primaries, regardless who leads in the popular vote or pledge delegates.
They should use whatever yardstick they want, Dean said.
That's what the rules provide for.
He also said the superdelegates are free to weigh the disputed primary results in Florida and Michigan.
Also announced today, by the way, they are going to seat the Florida delegation.
Well, that ought to shake up the Obama campaign that will please the Hillary campaign.
In a related story, New York Times said a Democrat turmoil tests party's low-key leader.
The turmoil in a Democrat presidential race has presented a sharp test of Howard Dean's low-profile approach to leading the Democrat National Committee, bringing calls for many Democrats for him to take a more aggressive role in diffusing the chaos that's happening here.
In an interview, Dean said he was taking steps to pave the way to a smooth convention.
Yep, I'm making calls all the time to people, he said.
I've spoken to a great number of leaders who are not aligned.
Can anybody name for me the chairman of the Republican National Committee?
That's low-key.
Operation Chaos rolling right on Ruth Marcus today.
Washington Post.
Too soon to stop this movie.
Woman, pro-Hillary, resents people telling her she needs to get out of this.
The unyielding arithmetic of the Democrats' delegate selection rules make Hillary's prospects of winning dim, and that's the Rosie scenario.
The prolonged primary contest with candidates and aides bickering like cranky toddlers partway through a long, hot car ride is bad for the Democrat Party.
Still, Clinton shouldn't drop out.
Not yet, anyway.
The party adopted procedures for picking a nominee that no one expected would matter.
Now, having worked hard and played by those rules to employ a Clinton phrase, Clinton's under pressure to quit before the game's over.
And why should she?
Clinton trails Obama by 133 delegates.
At a comparable point in the 1984 race, Gary Hartpence was more than 600 delegates behind Walter Mondo.
At this stage in 1980, Ted Kennedy was behind Jimmy Carter by nearly 1,000 delegates.
And neither Hartpence nor Teddy Kennedy pulled out at this.
See, the two guys didn't pull out.
The Democrats weren't telling the guys to pull out and quit.
And they were way far behind the leaders back then, farther behind than Hillary is now.
The clamor for Clinton's departure stems from Democrats' well-founded fear that they'll manage to blow what should have been an easy win.
Even if the campaigns were playing nice, continuing the fight imposes political costs.
The way it's going, McCain's admakers need only follow the candidates with video cameras, then splice in relevant footage once the nominee is chosen.
It'd be great if McCain was going to do that, but I don't think he's going to allow that.
That's right.
That's right, Limbo.
We are going to run an honorable campaign.
Meaningful, honorable campaign reform led by me and my team.
I don't care if it disappoints you or anybody else at the far right.
We're still going to do an honorable campaign.
And I'm going to appear on a letterman as often as I have to to make him like me.
Because everybody should like me.
The Order of the Sons of Italy in America has called on the Reverend Jeremiah Wright to apologize for remarks he made in an article published in the November, December 2007 Trumpet News magazine.
Wright wrote a eulogy for the late Scaser scholar Asa Hilliard, and he said, we told you about this last week.
Jesus' enemies had their opinion about him.
The Italians, for the most part, looked down their garlic noses.
So the organization here headed up, the Sons of Italy headed up by Philip Piccigallo, said, we're in a quandary.
We didn't want to become immersed in political media circus, and we didn't want to appear to be siding with anybody, but we could not stand idly by.
As the story was being discussed or managed or reviewed in various ways, the Italian-American aspect of it was omitted.
Clearly, Wright's remarks were aimed at Italian Americans, their garlic noses.
Well, see, that's the thing.
I think to you in the Sons of Italy, you need to understand where Reverend Wright's coming from.
We all, all of us who are of European heritage, we need to take a step back.
We need to understand the roots of black liberation theology.
We need to understand their rage.
And because of the original sin in this country of slavery, we need to allow for these people to say whatever they want, whenever they want, because we can't, by any way, shape, manner, or form, relate to their experiences, the oppressed and so forth.
And so that's what we're being told.
You know, if we are to believe the polling data, and I think the polling data is highly suspect, by the way, because of the Wilder effect and perhaps even the reverse Wilder effect.
There's a reverse Wilder effect possible here, too.
I'll explain both of those in a second.
But this polling data made, polling data says that the Wright business, all those sermons and so forth.
And by the speaking of those, Obama's out there talking about, well, you take sound bites here from 30 years or 20 years of work or whatever, and you loop them on television, of course, you can present him out of control.
Hey, Barack Baby, those sermons were, I mean, there was no great work done to find those sermons.
They were on the DVDs produced by the Reverend's Church.
The Reverend's Church wanted that stuff seen.
That's what they put on the DVDs.
Nobody went and dubbed anything over.
At any rate, the polls say that Reverend Wright has not hurt Obama at all.
He's gaining ground in Pennsylvania.
Now, they've found, you know, here's the Wilder effect, and it's named for Doug Wilder, who ran for governor of Virginia.
It's also sometimes called a Bradley effect for Tom Bradley in Los Angeles.
And basically what it is, is a white people lie to pollsters.
When a pollster show up or call you on the phone and ask you if you're going to vote for whoever in a campaign, if one of the candidates is black, black candidates tend to get a higher percentage of support from white people in a poll.
They tell upholstery, oh, yeah, I'm voting for the black guy because they don't want the pollster to think they're racist.
The reverse Wilder effect has been discovered.
Sometimes when pollsters get a hold of black people, black people will not say they're voting for the black guy because they don't want the pollster to think that the only thing that matters to them is racial solidarity.
Some people, I've got the story here deep in the chaos stack.
It may not be in the, let me see if it's next.
I don't think it is, but so I'm going to have to paraphrase it.
Yes, paraphrase it.
Basically, what it is, is that they've done surveys when live human beings from polling companies call blacks, there is the reverse wilder effect.
They will not say that they're going to vote for the black guy or the black candidate in an actual representative way.
But if it is a machine that does the call, it's a robocall, if it's obviously a machine, the polling people get different results from the same sample.
The point is that the black people who called by a machine from a polling company are more honest talking to the machine than a human being.
I read the story and I said, well, the solution to this is like we're solving everything in this country.
We're balkanizing ourselves.
Only women can represent women.
Only blacks can represent blacks.
Everybody has to hate whites.
Only Asians can represent Asians.
So let's have the polling companies hire some black people to call black people if it's what it takes to get the truth.
Just getting started here in our Operation Chaos Hour.
Be right back.
By the way, the Reverse Bradley Effect story is from the New Republic blog, and it is by Noam Scheiber.
And we found it yesterday that they headline Credit We're Do Reverse Bradley Effect Edition.
And this is the story that talks about how black voters are more honest when a machine from a polling company calls them than when a human being does.
To the phone, Sue in Irvine, California.
Nice to have you on the EIB network.
Hello.
Thank you, Rush.
Privileged to talk to you.
Thank you very much.
I've admired you for years, but I have to admit I've got a little problem, a little question.
I'm afraid that your Operation Chaos is affecting the Republican Party in a negative way.
How so?
Well, I realize that John McCain wasn't your candidate and he wasn't my candidate, but he's our candidate.
And I think you spend too much time criticizing him and making fun of his voice.
And I'm afraid you are maybe affecting Republicans who may be on the fence.
You're making him sound like he's just like Obama, just like Hillary.
And when it comes time to vote, there's going to be too many people who are going to say, why should I bother to vote?
They're all alike.
You know, if that happens to be the case, there will be one person responsible for that, and that will be Senator McCain, not me.
Senator McCain is the one actively seeking.
Can I give you the headline to a story here?
This is a story from thepolitico.com, and it's from March 27th.
GOP looks to McCain Democrats.
The Republican Party is looking to attract Democrats, Sue, in order to elect Senator McCain.
Senator McCain gives a speech in Annapolis today, and he basically tells the achievers of this country, the people who are working, that they are cynical and lazy and that they have had wealth come to them too easy and they need to go out and do some public service.
He needs to give that speech to the people in the entitlement industry in this country who are sitting around waiting for handouts from their fellow citizens.
I wish the Republican Party is the home of people who believe in American exceptionalism.
And Senator McCain's speech is not about American exceptionalism.
Clearly targeting liberal Democrats as his support base.
And I.
Well, I understand he says some of the things that we don't approve of, but doesn't he ever do anything that you do approve of that is positive?
Because there's going to come a time when we all have to make a choice at the polls.
And you keep tearing him down and pointing out all the bad things that he does.
See, I'm tearing him down by pointing out what you just call the bad things that he does.
Am I supposed to ignore those?
You know, I made a speech over the week at a super secret location, a super secret bunch of people.
The speech is off the record.
And I, since I gave the speech, I can talk a little bit about it.
During the speech itself, you know, I spoke up for conservatism.
And I said to the group, like I've said on this program, I am befuddled.
The Republican Party has three recent examples of how to win huge landslides and change the direction of this country.
Two landslides in 80 and 84 and taking over the House in 1994.
And the party has abandoned that for whatever reason.
And now we're seeking to expand our party by becoming like liberals and Democrats.
I said, I'm an American first, a conservative second, and a Republican third.
And I gave some of the criticisms to that group of Mr. McCain that you've heard me give on this program.
Then we all sat down and had dinner.
And after dinner during the Q ⁇ A, some voice in the crowd, when I was answering a previous question, said, get over it, which is essentially what you are asking me to do in a politer way.
No, no, no, no, I'm not.
Well, at all.
I don't mean it as a cut, but I want to finish the story.
This guy said, get over it.
And I came as close to losing it as I have in a speech to a friendly crowd.
I said, get over it.
You're asking me to get over my principles.
You're asking me to get over what I think is best for this country.
You're asking me to get over what I think needs to be done, and that is liberals need to be defeated, not joined and not appeased.
And I had my napkin in my hand, and I threw it on the floor, and I sort of didn't shout, but I was pretty loud and muttering an obscenity.
And I kept going, and I kept, and it was, you know, it's frustrating.
I know it is.
It is frustrating as hell.
Do you think that he is going to change because of these things that you say?
No.
He's 70 years old.
He's not going to change anything.
He's John McCain.
He's smarter than everybody else.
He's not going to change anything.
I'm not trying to get him to change.
Do you think that the Republicans are going to go for all of this and rush to the polls to vote for him because of all this?
Because of all the what?
Because of the way you're talking about him.
No, I think if he doesn't get Republican votes, it's because of the way he's talking.
I thought we wanted to win.
We do.
Okay.
And you say that all this is helping him.
I think, well, I hope it is in a roundabout way.
Because look at, let me put it to you the other way, Sue.
If I were to come out and endorse Senator McCain, if I just threw my principles to the wind and came on this show tomorrow and said, you know, I've rethought this, folks, overnight.
I don't think there's anything better we can do.
Senator McCain and my guy, and I started singing his praises, A, I'd lose my audience, but B, all the liberal Democrats, independents are going to vote for him, which Graham.
If they think all of a sudden, the worst thing I could do is come out and endorse the guy.
In fact, I got an audio soundbite saying so.
You want to hear it?
I want you to, Mike, forget, let's see, 24.
So let's start with 24.
This is Alexandria, Virginia.
Fox 5 Washington correspondent Patrick McGrath spoke with Edward Pritchard, Pritchard, a McCain classmate in Haskrill.
And Pritchard, the friend of McCain, said this about McCain.
I am more of a Democrat than I am a Republican.
If John were what Thrush Limbaugh wanted him to be, I couldn't be for him.
I mean, I just can't be for an extreme right-wing Republican, but we all know John is not.
I think it makes him a much stronger candidate, his ability to get middle-of-the-road voters.
There you have it.
So, I mean, this guy who wants to vote for McCain's a Democrat.
If I came out supporting McCain, this guy might think about it and go the other way.
You know, that guy probably will stay home or vote for a Democrat.
He might not vote at all.
Maybe so, but the punnies won't vote for McCain if I turn around.
And if this guy thinks I'm supporting McCain, this guy's not, because he thinks I'm a far-right-winger.
And he said, see, this is what we got to go out and we win with the middle of the roaders.
You know what happens to people in the middle of the road, they get run over?
You know, I just, this whole thing is mind-boggling to me.
The recipe is there for how to win with.
But we need another candidate, and we're not going to get one.
So that's so very true.
Okay.
But here, you want to hear, throw you a bone out there, Sue.
Okay.
And I also told this group this on Saturday night, a super secret group in a super secret location.
And it's going to be tough because McCain's who he is.
Nobody tells him anything, which is fine.
I, by the way, have no problem with that.
I mean, I don't like all these people.
I've got advisors with 15,000 pieces of advice every day.
I like a guy who knows what he's going to do, regardless if I disagree with it or not.
But he has promised to extend the Reagan or the Bush tax cuts.
He has promised not to raise taxes.
He has promised to keep the capital gains rate where it is.
We need to get that in a blood oath.
Even no matter, I don't care what the calamity.
He has to have a little help from Congress.
Well, see, see?
Now you've opened a new can of worms, but that's the way it goes.
You can make all the promises in the world.
No, promises.
No, I'm running out of.
Let me clarify this after we come back after the break.
You know, that's exactly what this show is.
And if you can't handle reality and the truth, if you want to listen, if you want to pretend it's a fantasy world out there, then this is not the place for you.
If you can't handle the truth, you're going to go nuts here.
Look at this headline.
GOP looks to McCain Democrats.
And of course, the Republican Party is just thrilled pink here because recent polling data in March suggests that McCain's cross-party support surpasses that of either Barack Obama or Hillary Rodham Clinton.
And the Republican Party thinks that is great news.
And that just makes me outraged.
It just makes me liberal.
The Republican Party thinks it's great we're attracting so many Democrats.
Rush, are you against Democrats voting for Republicans?
Yes.
If they're coming over and voting for us because our guy makes them think he's one of them.
If Democrats are voting for our guy because they think they're voting for a Democrat who calls himself a Republican, yes.
But Mithril Limbaugh, Ronald Reagan, their hero, he had lots of support from Democrats.
Yeah, but they came across as conservatives.
They joined the Republican Party because they were conservatives.
Mr. New Castrati, I don't like that name that you calleth Mithril Limbaugh.
Well, then start saying your S is right, and maybe I will stop calling you the new Castrati.
You're making fun of the way I speak now.
Yes.
You keep interrupting me.
McCain is reaching out.
Look at Sue in Irvine.
I know you're there.
McCain's reaching out to liberals and Democrats.
And it's a damn good thing that he can win over a few of them because every time he does that, every time he opens his mouth in a way to attract liberals and Democrats, he loses more to Republican base.
Not because I'm saying anything, because he is.
And if he wants to campaign on global warming to where he's indistinguishable from Obama and Hillary or Al Gore, if he wants to campaign on closing Guantanamo Bay, if he wants to campaign on punishing the oil companies, and then if he loses the presidential election, that will be why.
I assure you that if McCain wins, he will say it was because of him and his agenda.
You can't say he can't say if he wins, it's because of him, but if he loses, it's because of me.
Here's the thing.
In fact, James Taranto at Best of the Web Today had an analysis yesterday.
It's right on.
It's what I've been saying here.
The way this is headed, this is why I said we're going into the break.
I'm depressed.
Because McCain has said he's going to hold the line on taxes.
He's going to extend the Bush tax cuts.
He's not going to raise taxes.
We need that in a blood oath.
To us, to his supporters, to his base, Republicans.
But there is this problem.
The Democrats may expand their majorities in the House and the Senate.
Presidents like to get things done.
Getting things done these days is defined by passing legislation.
If the Democrats are going to set the agenda on legislation because they've got the majority, you've got a Republican president who likes working with them.
So then we'd have to rely on a veto of any tax increase.
I know that for those of you who are worried about the prices at the gas pump and the grocery store, I don't think capital gains and taxes, they don't relate to you, right?
It's not, you're not interested in that.
Capital gains, tax cuts.
And I'm interested in it because it represents economic growth.
It represents the way out of this economic malaise that people think that we're in.
But if he's not going to veto some of the legislators, he's screwed.
It just, it's just, I mean, it's so just not necessary.
I mentioned also at this speech on Saturday night, what I've mentioned on this program, McCain almost quit the Republican Party in 2001.
He's so fed up over what happened at the South Carolina primary in 2000.
And he's the one that approached John Kerry, the haughty John Kerry, about being his VP candidate in 2004.
And of course, when I say this, some people say, prove it.
Prove it?
I mean, it's every, but okay.
Sidney Blumenthal, maybe not the best of sources for people, big Clinton operative, loyalist, Sidney Blumenthal.
I mean, this guy is just calling Grassy Knoll.
This guy is indescribable.
Anyway, he was at Barnes and Noble bookstore somewhere and said this.
Now, this is web audio.
He said this about McCain.
Although he doesn't want to talk to reporters about it now, there was a time, and I was privy to some of those who were involved, did conduct negotiations through third parties about whether or not he would leave the Republican Party and become an independent, more or less aligned in the Senate with the Democrats.
It was happening about the time Jim Jeffords jumped.
And then 2001, 2002.
And then Blumenthal continued with this.
I think Republicans as a whole, even though they're suspicious, many of them, of McCain, and have been angry at him in the past, are much more disciplined as party members than Democrats are.
So I think Republicans will rally behind their candidate to a greater degree than people recognize right now.
So I do not think this will hurt him.
And if I were advising McCain right now, I would say he's slightly overreacting to his conservative base.
I don't think he needs to do that so much.
I think they don't have any choice right now.
Well, that's for damn sure.
There is no choice.
Take your pick of the three.
And that's white comedian, well-known white comedian Paul Shanklin as John McCain.
And should I stay or should I go?
Operation Chaos continues to befuddle the drive-by media.
We're going to audio soundbite number one, Mike.
Last night, PMS NBC's hardball with Chris Matthews, Tucker Carlson, Chatsworth Osborne Jr., and Chris Matthews had this exchange about what's going on in Pennsylvania with all the Republican crossovers.
You've had about 140,000 people in the state of Pennsylvania switch a registration from Republican to Democrat.
How many of those do you believe did that in order to vote for Hillary Clinton?
Some, maybe, but you got to believe common sense tells you that the majority of those, maybe the vast majority, did that in order to vote for Barack Obama.
That'd be consistent with what we're seeing in other states.
Talker, everybody I know fits that description for a couple of reasons.
One of my relatives switched to vote not for Barack Obama.
She switched from Republican to vote against Hillary Clinton.
And if Rush Limbaugh comes out in his pipe dreams and says the reason they switched was to vote for Hillary because of some weird strategic move to bring down the Democratic Party, I think he's as delusional as Senator Clinton was in Bosnia.
And so exactly as predicted, the drive-bys struggling with how to deal with the success of Operation Chaos now seek to discredit it.
Lashing out here, folks.
I'm in a good mood again.
We got him right where we want him.
From the San Francisco Chronicle of Philippeteer Andrew Ross, Bill Clinton's tirade stunned some delegates.
The Bill Clinton who met privately with California superdelegates at last weekend state convention was a far cry from the congenial former president who afterward publicly urged fellow Democrats to chill out.
What happened was everything was going fine.
And then a former Bill Richardson delegate, Rachel Banana, Who now supports Hillary told Bill how sorry she was to have heard former Clinton campaign manager James Carville call Richardson a Judas for attacking Obama?
And the guys here write it was as if somebody pulled a pin from a grenade five times, five times to my face.
He said he'd never do that.
Apparently, Clinton just blew up, just lost it.
He's doing that more and more in this campaign, and more and more people are seeing this.
The name Jerry Ziefman ring a bell.
Jerry Ziefman, yes, during the Clinton impeachment, Jerry Ziefman was a head honcho during the Nixon Watergate period hearings.
He was the guy who hired Hillary Clinton on that committee.
He's also the guy who fired her.
He supervised her when she worked in a Watergate investigation.
He says, Hillary's history of lies and unethical behavior goes back farther, goes much deeper than anybody realized.
Now, Jerry Ziefman, a lifelong Democrat, supervised the work of Hillary Rodham Clinton, or Hillary Rodham, on the committee.
He fired her from the committee staff, refused to give her a letter of recommendation.
She was only one of three people who earned that distinction in Ziefman's 17-year career.
Why?
In an interview last week, Ziefman said because she was a liar.
She was an unethical, dishonest lawyer.
She conspired to violate the Constitution, the rules of the House, the rules of the committee, and the rules of confidentiality.
The actions of Hillary and her cohorts went directly against the judgment of top Democrats, up to and including the majority leader at the time, Tip O'Neill, that Nixon clearly had the right to counsel.
She tried to see to it Nixon didn't get a lawyer in all of this.
Zeifman says that Hillary was determined to gain enough votes on the Judiciary Committee to change House rules and deny counsel to Nixon.
And in order to pull this off, Zefman says that Hillary wrote a fraudulent legal brief and confiscated public documents to hide her deception.
Now, this comes from this is Dan Calabresi at NorthstarWriters.com.
Hillary removed, William O. Douglas had been brought up, and he was granted, when he was on the Supreme Court, he was granted the right to a lawyer, but it's fundamental in our judicial system.
So Hillary removed all the Douglas files to the offices where she was located, which at that time were secured and inaccessible to the public.
This is from Ziefman.
Hillary then proceeded to write a legal brief arguing there was no precedent for the right to representation by counsel during an impeachment proceeding as if the Douglas case had never occurred.
She just stole the documents, then wrote a fraudulent brief, and she tried to hide the evidence.
The brief was so fraudulent and ridiculous, Ziefman believes Hillary would have been disbarred if she had submitted it to a judge.
So I don't know if this is going to get wide play, but if it does, it could finish her off.
Well, really, only they can finish themselves off, and they're in the process of doing it.
Here's Ted Turner, by the way, Charlie Rose last night about, well, no.
Let's do 20, 20, cut 21.
I don't have time to play 20.
This is Charlie Rose says to Ted Turner last night on his show, PBS: what will happen if global warming is not addressed immediately?
Not doing it will be catastrophic.
We'll be eight degrees hotter in 10, not 10, but in 30 or 40 years, and basically none of the crops will grow.
Most of the people will have died, and the rest of us will be cannibals.
Civilization will have broken down.
The few people left will be living in a failed state like Somalia or Sudan, and living conditions will be intolerable.
The droughts will be so bad there'll be no more corn growing.
Not doing it is suicide.
There you have it.
Cannibals.
We're all going to be cannibals 30 to 40 years if we don't do anything about global warming and no better off than Sudan or Somalia.
Charlie Rose said, hey, what's wrong with the population, Ted?
Too many people.
That's why we have global warming.
We have global warming because too many people are using too much stuff.
But if there were less people, they'd be using less stuff.
Meanwhile, this guy practically owns Montana.
He raises Buffalo.
He's got all these restaurants, Ted's Buffalo Burgers or whatever, Ted's Montana beef or whatever.
I've been into one in Atlanta.
And it's not bad.
But he's buying property up all over the place out there.
Anyway, Mike in Detroit, you're next on the EIB network.
Sir, hello.
Mega, mega college Republican Dittos Rush.
Thank you, sir.
You know, I have to say, my mother had six of us kids, and every day growing up, she would have us listen to at least an hour of the Rush Limbaugh Show after school.
In fact, if we weren't such devout Christians, we would probably start our own religion based on your teachings and make you our prophet.
That's how much we love you.
Way to drive-bys hear that.
Thank you, sir.
Well, anyway, I have a question for you.
And I'm here in Michigan, and our Democrat primary has already passed.
In any case, it doesn't count anyway.
So I was calling to get my marching orders from the Supreme Commander of Operation Chaos on what I and other Americans like me should be in.
Well, and in Michigan, I realized you're in the reserves.
We may need you down the road.
There's nothing in Michigan.
Well, actually, I don't know what you could do, but you know, there's the husband of Debbie Stabenow has been caught buying a prostitute for $150.
Have you heard that?
No, I haven't.
Oh, it's in the...
Yeah, Debbie Stabenow's husband, Athens, Athens, whatever.
The guy running Liberal Talk Radio paid $150 for a hooker.
And this is, of course, she's issued a statement disapproving of this.
But there might be an opportunity here for chaos in Michigan on that regard.
I have to think about that.
Look, I appreciate your desire.
A lot of people, a lot of people want to be part of Operation Chaos.
Right now, we're focusing on three or four states.
None of them are Michigan, but hang in there.
Marching orders will be coming at some point.
Sadly, my friends, we are out of precious broadcast moments, but there will be more tomorrow.
In just 21 exciting hours, we will be back and do it all over again.
Thanks for being with us today.
▲
Export Selection