All Episodes
Previous Next
March 17, 2008 - Rush Limbaugh Program
35:21
March 17, 2008, Monday, Hour #3
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Greetings, my friends.
Welcome back.
Rush Limbaugh with Broadcast Excellence of Fastest Three Hours in Media.
Here we are, already at the third hour.
Great to have you with us.
Phone number, if you'd like to join us, is 800-282-2882.
The email address, lrushbow at EIBNet.com.
You know, it sort of just hit me at the top of the hour break what we heard in the last hour.
Those two things.
The first thing, and we're still looking for this ourselves, still doing research on the Guilt by Association Act in Illinois that Obama was opposed to.
He had a caller said he researched Obama and found that Obama had opposed the Illinois Guilt by Association Act.
And the reason what it was, it allowed people on parole, it would not allow people on parole to fraternize with the criminal element, racketeers and others who have found themselves in the clink.
And Obama voted against it.
And the stated reason that he gave was that it would be impossible for black people to avoid in their own neighborhoods and communities people who had been in a criminal element.
Would not be possible.
Now, stop and think about this.
This is a Democrat saying this about the black population of the country.
And if this is true, and if we, and I'm not doubting the caller, it's just we want to confirm these things ourselves.
If this is true, and of course, if we give this the large megaphone, I mean, this is the kind of thing that sends Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson over the edge.
And I wonder what their reaction to that will be.
And Mrs. Clinton, if this is true, and if we can find evidence, documentary evidence that indeed Obama said this, and this is his rationale for opposing the Guilt by Association Act, well, it's made to order for her on a silver platter.
The second thing in this one, you know, I was back in Snerdley's office and we were just chilling out back there.
He said, do you realize what you just heard?
And I said, what do you mean?
You have forced Barack Obama to counter you in Pennsylvania.
He has had to start spending his own money, his campaign resources, on a campaign to get Republicans to register in the Democrat primary to vote for him and possibly running these ads on my show, on stations that carry my show.
This is profound.
This is truly profound.
Because you've got the drive-by media just up in arms that this is happening in the first place because they think it's un-American and it's a violation of the law and it's tampering with the sacred time-honored vote, blah, blah, blah.
Of course, to them, you know, what we're supposed to do as Republicans, we're just supposed to bend over forward, grab the ankles, and lose.
We're supposed to sit by and let them do whatever they want to do in terms of political and electoral mischief and just let it happen.
Well, we get involved and start playing tricks on them using their own tactics.
Why they get outraged.
So the drive-by is the media people are just livid about this.
And now, when they learn, when these cable talkers at night, when they learn that Obama is now trying to counter me, he's spending resources on me, folks, not McCain.
He is spending resources on you, not McCain.
He is actively urging Pennsylvania Republicans to crossover.
He's telling the ad tells him how to do it.
You have to go in.
You have to register as a Democrat by the 25th of March.
If you don't do it before then, you can't vote in the primary, and at least on the Democrat side.
So this is, I mean, this is cool.
This is profound.
And the people this is going to irritate, I may watch a little cable TV tonight, which I don't normally do anymore.
I may do this just to see if this actually breaks.
Now, Obama planning a major race speech tomorrow, according to Ben Smith at thepolitico.com.
Barack Obama will give a major speech on the larger issue of race in this campaign.
I told reporters in Monaca, Pennsylvania just now.
He was pressed there, as he has been at recent appearances, on statements by his former pastor, Jay Wright.
I'm going to be talking about not just Reverend Wright, but the larger issue of race in this campaign.
He added that he would talk about how some of these issues are perceived from Wind and Black Church issue, for example.
He also briefly defended Wright from the image that has come through in a handful of repeatedly televised clips.
The caricatures being painted of Wright is not accurate, Obama's saying.
Now, this is also going to be very interesting to hear this speech tomorrow.
I don't know what time it's going to be.
Let's see.
Well, if he does this, he's going to be in Philadelphia tomorrow.
So this would be a Obama, you have no idea what they got planned for you in Philadelphia, by the way.
I'm just talking about on election on the 22nd and primary.
You have no idea what Fast Eddie Rendell is going to do to you.
Don't forget what Fast Eddie said.
He said, I don't think Pennsylvanians are ready to elect a black guy.
And they're going to get all these blue-collar Philadelphia guys all worked up into a lather between now and April 22nd.
But if Obama is going to give this speech, I have advised him for two days in a row how to handle this Jeremiah Wright situation.
And what I've told him to do is to go out and say it's tragic so many Americans believe what Reverend Wright's preaching.
It's tragic that there are so many Americans who do blame their country first.
It's tragic that there are people in this country who have been made to feel and think these things and then, you know, bash Bush a little bit because that'll go over well, and then say, you want to be president to end this.
You want to be president to stop this.
You want to tell people that we can all come together and unite once again, even though you've not shown anybody how you can do it.
They don't care right now.
They just love hearing you say you're going to do it.
What happens if he says something like that in this speech tomorrow?
I think he's going to because he says, I'm going to be talking about not just Reverend Wright, but the larger issue of race in this campaign.
He would also said he's going to talk about some of these issues and how they are perceived from within the black church, for example.
So this is going to be interesting, ladies and gentlemen.
Obama's race speech tomorrow.
Let's see if my advice finds its way into the speech tomorrow.
I mean, he's going to go out there and counter what I'm doing with Hillary, what we are all doing with Republicans registering to vote for Hillary.
Obviously, they're out there listening.
They're paying attention.
Thinks I'm up to something.
Thinks it's pretty smart.
Why not take my advice on this?
And it'll have to be a long speech on race, but if it's a traditional Obama speech, people are going to love it.
If he does his hope and future and all that sort of stuff and then makes race the central theme of it, what, you think he can't win?
Okay.
Well, now that's a good point.
That's a good point.
That's an excellent point.
In fact, Snerdley.
Snerdley just said to me, this is well worth considering, even though it's from Snerdley.
One of the things about the Obama campaign was that he was not a black candidate.
He transcended race, if you will.
His candidacy was not about race.
It was not about how we have overcome, none of those usual things.
But he was larger than that.
And now, when he goes out to make a speech about race, he then thus becomes the Democrat racial candidate.
We'll see.
He might be able to do this, given whoever writes his speeches and how charismatically he can deliver them when they're on a prompter.
We'll see if he can pull this off.
I got to take a quick time out here, folks.
A few more audio soundbites, your phone calls, and much more evidence of Operation Chaos all over today's newspapers.
Stay with us.
Anybody notice that the Clintons have not weighed in on the Reverend Jay Wright story at all?
And they're not going to.
According to Byron York at National Review Online, they're not going to.
They're playing it very, very, very cool, which they don't have to weigh in on it.
Everybody's doing their work for them here.
They have to sit back and talk about other things.
Nancy Pelosi was on Stephanopoulos' show yesterday.
The Queen Bee shows her stinger on ABC.
They actually taped this on Friday, aired it yesterday.
Stephanopoulos says, you know, it's just impossible that they're going to come together on a single ticket.
How can you be so sure that they will not come together?
I'm just absolutely sure.
I just know it.
I just know it.
I've been in politics a long time, and I study it very carefully.
And I think that each one of them will make a great top of the ticket.
And we will have a dream ticket that will contain one of them.
Whoa, the Queen Bee shows her stinger.
There will be no dream ticket that contains both Obama and Hillary.
And she is certain of it.
Stephanopoulos, I just know.
I just do.
Don't doubt me.
The Queen Bee is saying.
Stephanopoulos says, well, you've said the superdelegates ought not to be dispositive.
What do you mean by that?
Now, here's what I said.
What I said was, if the votes of the superdelegate overturn what happened in the elections, it would be harmful to the Democratic Party.
But it's a delegate race.
In other words, if one wins the Electoral College and one wins the popular vote, guess who's president of the United States?
The way the system works is that the delegates choose the nominee.
No, no, no, Nancy.
You don't know your own party rules.
The superdelegates are there precisely to make sure that the idiot voters in the Democrat Party don't screw up.
But what she's laying down, a marker here, because when she says, if the votes of the superdelegates overturn what happened in the elections, it'd be harmful to the Democrat Party.
But it's a delegate race.
What she's saying is that it's over and Barack has won.
And that if they overturn it for Hillary, it's going to be bad for the Democrat Party.
More chaos ensuing.
It's all over the place.
New York Times delegates or delegate battles embroil two states, Michigan and Florida.
Now, I think Michigan's decided to do a mail-in or what they're going to do on June 3rd.
I think Michigan's going to do a redo.
But in Florida down here, the Democrats are fit to be tied over Bill Nelson.
Senator Bill Nelson, a former astronaut, he's out there urging a mail-in thing, and none of the Democrats in the Florida legislature want to do this.
Very few in the Florida congressional delegation want to do it, and they're upset with Nelson because he's out there trying to play front and center role on this, get his name on television and face on television, name in the papers all over the place.
So they're at a mess down here as to what to do.
I mean, most people, particularly in South Florida, don't even know how to vote, whether it's a simple ballot or you go to like a mail-in ballot or whatever.
And then when it comes to counting them, they don't know how to do that either.
So at this point, ripe for fraud.
Washington Post, Dan Balls today.
White male vote, especially critical.
Isn't it amazing how this keeps popping up?
All this time during the primaries, we hear about, well, you got to go out and get the women's vote, the soccer moms, or whatever the current year iteration of women happens to be.
Then we worry about getting the minority vote and we worry about getting the Hispanic vote.
When it comes down to it, the white male vote is especially critical, as though it never is.
It's always news to these people and to drive-bys that the white male vote is especially critical.
Why is it especially critical?
Because Barack Obama is losing support among white males.
And it started, interestingly enough, in the last couple of weeks.
And it intensified last week.
The competition, this is Dan Balls writing in the Washington Post, the competition for the support of white men, particularly those defined as working class, will shape the showdown between Clinton and Obama in Pennsylvania on April 22nd.
Obama won majorities among those voters in what appeared to be breakthrough victories in Wisconsin and Virginia last month, but he badly lost working-class white men to Clinton in New York, Clinton, Ohio, and Texas two weeks ago, keeping the outcome of the race in doubt indefinitely.
Chaos.
Chaos.
And who are they looking to to solve their chaos of the Democrat Party?
White male voters.
Here is the Associated Press.
Polarities persist in Democrat race.
Something happened to the feel-good, way cool Democrat presidential contest in the months since a woman and a black man began their pathbreaking race for the White House.
Hmm, folks, I wonder what could have happened here.
By the millions, black voters voted for the black candidate and women voted for the woman.
White men seem torn by the millions.
Senator Barack Obama has broken historic barriers, especially among the young, as the first black candidate with a serious chance of the presidency.
Voters who might ordinarily balk at a female president have backed Cillary Clinton in her pioneering effort.
Those gains have not been enough to erase divisions by race, a task perhaps beyond any mortal and any one election, nor lesser ones between the sexes.
Well, Hail's Bell, this is not hard to understand.
Polarities persist in a Democrat race.
The Democrat Party is based on polarities.
It's based on polarizing people.
The Democrat Party is a segmented party, and they look at the population in segments.
You've got whites, then you've got white men, then you've got white women, then you've got women.
You've got African-American women, Hispanic women.
They segment everybody into a group, and then they try to make as many people in that group victims as they can.
And they wonder why all the blacks are voting Obama and all the women are voting Hillary.
This is what they have fostered.
This is what their policies have given us.
As we mentioned last week, it's sort of hilarious here.
The Clintons, all fine, all these Democrats, all these liberals, really, really happy with affirmative action.
And let's define it accurately.
Affirmative action is pushing people beyond their qualifications and beyond their achievement in order to assuage our guilt over the discrimination based on race in the past in this country.
And so it's fine when it happens to the Acme Razorblade Company.
It's fine when it happens, you know, to the company that the Roadrunner calls, the coyote calls to get all his stuff to beat the road.
It's fine when it happens where you work.
It's fine where it happens where you and I work.
But when it happens to liberals who design the policy, that's not good.
So they've got to stomp on the black guy, the affirmative action candidate, in this case, Barack Obama.
Because that's out there what they were saying, the Ferraro controversy.
Why?
Wouldn't even be here if he were a white guy.
And so, affirmative, it's all coming back to haunt him.
You know, we got these drive-by guys.
Polarities persist in Democrat race.
What did you people in the drive-bys think?
The Democrat Party's unified everybody?
You think all Democrats are at love with one another?
And they're all at one with themselves in nature?
This party hates itself as much as it hates the country.
And this race is showing it.
So polarities persist in Democrat race.
Something happened to the feel-good, way-cool Democrat presidential contest in the months since a woman and a black man began their path-breaking race for the White House.
This was supposed to unite us to every American's go, oh, look at how wonderful this party is.
Now, guess what?
Everybody's concerned.
I'll tell you what Pelosi really means when she says this ticket will not be either one of these two or with each other.
It'll have one of them on the ticket, but both of them will not be on the ticket.
You know what she knows?
You know what she's saying?
They can't win without a white guy somewhere on the ticket.
And the story of the Washington Post, oh, we got to get white guys.
The white male vote is crucial.
And Obama's losing it.
And something happened to the feel-good, way cool Democrat president.
I wonder what that could have been.
What happened to upset the apple cart in this way cool, wow, emancipated Democrat race?
I'll tell you, it was me and you.
We have succeeded beyond our wildest dreams.
Operation Chaos.
All right, we, so far, ladies and gentlemen, have been unable to find anything on the state of Illinois legislative website about the Guilt by Association Act.
We may have been scammed, but we weren't scammed because we were always cautionary about accepting this.
I've had a couple people looking at it for the last half hour, cannot find anything.
Now, it doesn't mean it's not there.
We are talking about Illinois, but it's not readily discoverable.
So we will continue our exhaustive search.
Here's Reggie in Washington as we go back to the phones.
Hi, Reggie.
Nice to have you with us.
How you doing, Rush?
Pretty good, sir.
Thank you.
I'm calling right now just to make a couple comments.
I was scanning the radio.
Your radio show popped up.
And I heard this Operation Chaos.
Isn't that great?
I mean, this is one of the most fun things that we have done here.
Obama's even buying radio time in Pennsylvania now, urging Republicans to register for him.
I mean, he has to.
He definitely has to, but I don't think that it has too much to do with Operation Chaos.
I think that Operation Chaos holds about as much water as this Guilt by Association legislation.
Well, you're saying that Operation Chaos is not working?
I think it is it may be more of a self-serving situation that you have created to make ratings.
Wait a sec.
You think I'm making it up?
You think that all these newspaper stories are not accurate of all these people, Republicans who are admitting to registrars that they are changing registration to Democrat in Ohio and Texas to vote for Hillary?
I mean, you think I'm making all of this up?
I think that you may be exaggerating it.
Yes, you know, you are shocking.
The words that you use do exaggerate.
And I do believe that you have a few boneheaded followers that have gone out of their way to tamper, and that's cool.
But, I mean, the statistics don't show that you have affected anything by a last life.
Hillary is still winning by very tight margins, especially in the last race.
And if you do, if you can't recall, last time the primary situation dipped down south, racial polarities did rear their ugly head, and it did the same thing this time.
Wait a minute now.
What does racial polarity have to do with this?
It has something to do with the fact that the Jeremiah Wright thing comes out.
You get on the radio, you start hollering Hussein, blah, blah, blah.
You all know the rhetoric.
Wait a minute, Reggie.
Wait a second, Reggie.
And you all know the way you do it.
I don't mention his name.
You've said his name on this program today.
I haven't.
We don't put callers on this phone.
If you'd have told us that you're going to use Obama's middle name, we wouldn't have put you on.
Oh, Rush, this is what I'm talking about.
The name is a fact, but you understand what it invokes.
You and people like Billow, do it.
I think to Keith Oberman and Chris Matthews, all the men, tune in, MSNBC, great people, tell us about the real news.
Reggie, I think you're jealous.
Jealous?
Of me and the power.
Yes, this radio show has.
You know damn well Operation Chaos is working better than even I imagined it has it has inflamed the drive-by media It has caused Obama to spend his money running against me and you just sitting out there, you think I'm making it all up or exaggerating for my ego?
I don't have any ego in this.
I want to win, buddy.
So what you're telling me, Rush, is that Obama would not have run a radio ads either way it went?
I'm damn well telling you that straight.
Absolutely right.
If there were not Republicans that were crossing over and voting Hillary, he wouldn't dare waste his money asking Republicans to cross over and vote for him.
But Rush, for every Republican that crosses over to vote Hillary, there are probably two more to cross over and vote for him.
He is undeniably the candidate that has the independence and the Republican voters coming to him.
Yeah, but it doesn't, even if what you say is true and you're just guessing, even if for every Hillary Republican voter, there are two Republicans voting for Obama, you don't know that yet.
We don't know what's going to happen.
But I'm just telling you that it wouldn't be happening at all if it weren't for the fact that Operation Chaos, Rush the Vote, was working and profoundly so.
Historically, profoundly so.
Okay, can I ask you one more question?
Yeah.
All right.
So for the, this is factual, that they're all Republican voters that would much rather go with Obama.
Was Rush the vote or was Operation Chaos responsible for them voting for Obama?
No.
I don't.
It might have been.
All I said was, I did suggest that we needed to keep the Democrat soap opera going.
We needed to create some chaos.
We need this party undecided and at war with each other all the way through the convention.
I suggested that Republicans, after our nominee was chosen, I said we need to bloody up Obama politically.
And I, you know, I got to give it to you.
I will give it to you.
If this thing were to work out the way that you would have it, it would be ingenious.
It would go down in the history books.
I'll give you that.
But what I urge you and the listeners to be cautious of is the fact that the Democrats and Republicans that are not satisfied with the war and the economy, we hate those things a lot more than they dislike one candidate or the other.
Right.
You know, it's a complicated thing.
I don't understand that.
I just said it.
You people, Democrat Party, hate your party as much as you hate the country.
No, we don't.
And you also said that the Democratic Party was polarized.
I don't think they were polarized at all or segmented.
I think that we're representative of society, and I do.
No, you're not.
No, you're not.
That's the problem.
You're really not.
Country does not want to be segmented.
The country does not want to be segregated.
The country does not want to be made up as members.
We want to be Americans.
And it's a Democrat Party that is refusing that.
If the Democrat Party is giving us African Americans, Hispanic Americans, gay Americans, homosexual Americans, lady Americans, female Americans, all this hyphenated American stuff has come from your party because you desire people segmented.
No, we do not provide, we would not rather people be segmented.
We, as Democrats, are representative of the United States, and that's why these people and all the different races and all the different backgrounds and ethnicities and genders.
Maybe so, but I still don't think.
I don't think you're right.
The racism, the racism in this country right now is taking place in the Democrat Party.
And I got a question for you.
Okay.
When Hillary steals this from Barack, which you know, you know and I know that that's the objective here.
If she steals this from Obama via superdelegates or a riot or something at the convention, what are you going to do?
What will I do?
Are you still going to be saying we Democrats?
I'll tell you the truth.
I will tell you the absolute God's honest truth.
Before I listened to your show, I was prepared to vote for Ralph Nader.
If Obama didn't get it, I was voting for Nader because I do not approve of some of the tactics that have been employed.
But as of now, after listening to this and listening to how unified you all are, I will vote for Hillary Clinton before I do anything to waste that vote over some small game sometimes.
You're going to be unique.
You're going to be because most people that want Obama are going to be livid, particularly black and young people who are, they're going to be livid.
The Democrat Party, this is all a bunch of hocus pocus about change and the future and all this.
If they deny him his victory here, there's going to be hell to pay.
And by the way, I have to run here, Reggie, but I am already in the history books.
This will just be, Operation Chaos will just be a new chapter on me in the history books.
Stu in Chambersburg, Pennsylvania.
Hello, sir.
You're next.
Hey, Rush.
Love you.
Thank you.
I'm a boneheaded follower, and I wanted to tell you that I just changed my affiliation to Democrat, and I haven't been this excited about voting since 1984.
I hope Reggie's still listening.
Reggie said he thought that this whole Operation Chaos was BS.
Well, bonehead here waiting for orders.
Okay, what happened?
What happened when you went and registered?
Did they say anything to you?
Didn't say anything, but I was just proud.
Did you tell them that you were a Republican wanting to register Democrat?
Yep, I said, well, I didn't say I was Republican.
I said, I just want to change affiliation.
But I'd love to see them in disarray at the Democrat Party, and I just, I can't wait to go that day and vote rush.
Thank you.
That's great.
That's great.
More excited.
What does this tell us?
In a way, this is somewhat concerning.
A Republican just said that the most excited he's been since 1984 is a chance to go vote for Hillary Clinton in the primary.
I'm just listening to Jim Kramer try to defend his statement last week.
Leave your money in Bears Dearns.
Nothing's going wrong with Bear Stearns.
He's trying to say at least, oh, never mind.
You'll catch him later.
I got much to do and too little time to get it all in.
Julie in Crooked River Ranch, Oregon.
Great to have you here.
Thanks.
It's great to be here.
I love your show today.
Thank you.
Yeah, I mean, they really handed, the preacher man really handed you some juicy stuff to work with.
Well, the whole Democrat Party's been handing me stuff here.
It's just, it's more fun.
It's a blast.
I nearly fell over when I saw those videos.
I mean, it was perfect.
Just perfect.
Reverend Jay Wright?
Yes.
He's something else, isn't he?
And then some.
Yeah, and I believe that Obama is either a liar or he is stupid.
And he must think we're all stupid.
He's lying.
Yes, he's lying.
There's no question about you is lying.
Yeah, his ears the size of they are.
He had to have heard that.
Oh, he had to have heard about it.
Wait a second.
Don't go to earroot.
Let's see.
Yeah, I know.
That's it, Gabby.
Don't tell me what your 12-year-old thinks of him.
We don't want you to get it.
No, no, no, no.
I guess that wasn't very nice.
It just annoyed me to no end.
What, his ears?
No, the video thing with the preacher.
Yeah, well.
You know, and all that rhetoric.
And then he had to go and take a jab at Bill and saying he was riding dirty and all that.
And I can't believe that went on in church in front of those children.
I mean, my parents would have ushered us out of there so quick and we would have told everybody in town and never went back.
Yeah, well, that's what Obama's going to make a speech about tomorrow because he wants to explain to people the black church culture and what they think in there.
I'm going to be keeping a sharp eye on this, on this speech, because he is lying about not knowing what goes on in there.
And we know it from Reverend Wright himself.
Reverend Wright, in two interviews, New York Times, has let it be known perfectly clear that Obama was well aware of Wright's sermons, and that's why there was a planned moment in the campaign where they're going to have to distance themselves from one another, and that has happened.
It was all planned because Obama knew what was being said there.
Mrs. Clinton, by the way, this morning at George Washington University delivered a speech on Iraq, and I want you to hear a portion of what she said.
It is time to end this war as quickly and responsibly as possible.
Senator Obama tells voters that as president, he'd withdraw combat brigades from Iraq within 16 months.
But one of his top foreign policy advisors told a different story.
She told a British television reporter, and I quote, he will, of course, not rely on some plan that he's crafted as a presidential candidate or a U.S. senator.
Senator Obama has said often that words matter.
I strongly agree.
But giving speeches alone won't end the war.
And making campaign promises you might not keep certainly won't end it.
In the end, the true test is not the speeches a president delivers.
It's whether the president delivers on the speeches.
This is surprising to me.
This is pretty tame.
Her energy level is non-existent.
I mean, I realize she's had probably a big weekend and it's a Monday morning and so forth, but Not only that, she's not telling the truth.
It's amazing how everybody but me has seemed to have forgotten this.
Except for Carolyn Lockhead, the San Francisco Chronicle, Washington Bureau Chief.
Well, not chief, but she is a writer there.
Headline from today's San Francisco Chronicle, even if Democrats win, total Iraq exit uncertain.
Still, when asked in New Hampshire if they would promise to have all U.S. troops out by the end of their first term, Obama and Clinton both refused.
And so did the Breck girl.
I remember that New Hampshire debate.
They were asked to pledge that after the first four years of their presidency, that the troops would be out of Iraq.
And neither Obama nor Hillary would pledge that.
And I've known all along that these people are not going to pull our troops out of there, and they're not going to saddle themselves and their party with defeat in Iraq.
They're just not going to do it.
I've never had any doubt about this.
Besides, now I know how they're going to do it.
Hillary or Obama, they get in there, and after two weeks, two weeks after the inauguration, their listeners, voters, supporters, wackos in the fringe kook base, what about Iraq?
What about you?
They were going to get done everywhere.
Well, they'll say we didn't know what we really were encountering here.
The Bush administration kept so much from us.
Until we got here, we were unaware of how deeply involved we are.
And a withdrawal now would be the worst thing we could do.
And they'll blame it on Bush for not being forthcoming and honest, which would be another lie.
But, you know, neither one of these two are going to pull us out of Iraq if it means that the Democrat Party will get saddled with the defeat from USA today.
Hostility harder on the hearts of black people.
A cynical and mistrustful personality apparently leads to greater blood pressure fluctuations for blacks than whites, which could help explain blacks' higher heart disease rate, according to a Duke University researcher, reported this Friday at the American Psychosomatic Society meeting in Baltimore.
When I hear this, you know, hostility is harder on black hearts.
I'm thinking of poor Reverend Jay Wright.
I mean, if there's ever a guy, I mean, hostility doesn't even begin to describe him.
By the way, more Operation Chaos.
Boston Globe.
Many voting for Clinton to boost GOP seek to prolong bitter battle.
Now, in the third or fourth paragraph, they attribute this to conservative talk radio.
You have to get to about 15 or 16 paragraphs.
Conservative radio giant Rush Limbaugh said on Fox News, February 2020, quote me talking about Operation Chaos, the Boston Globe.
It's everywhere now, folks.
New York Times blog, John Harwood, behind closed doors.
Democrats seek answers.
What's gone wrong?
And they know it's Operation Chaos.
We'll be back, Steve.
Well, that's it, folks.
Sadly, you got to skate.
Got to get out of here.
Be back, though, in 21 hours with more of the same Operation Chaos, no doubt.
▲
Export Selection