All Episodes
Feb. 28, 2008 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:12
February 28, 2008, Thursday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Ah.
Are you?
We are back.
Rush Limbaugh, the cutting edge of societal evolution.
The Limbaugh Institute for Advanced Conservative Studies, I, a highly trained broadcast specialist meeting and surpassing all audience expectations daily.
The most listened to and largest radio talk show in America, one of our singular achievements here.
We have made the word liberal a dirty word.
That's among the many things that they hate.
We have made liberal a dirty word to the point that they do not want to use it to describe them, including Barack Obama.
No desire.
He makes fun of the fact people call him a liberal.
Ah, liberal, this liberal.
They come up with progressives or moderates or some other label for themselves.
They go out and hire people like George Lackoff, rhymes with to help them come up with language to fool people.
They just we have made liberal a dirty word.
The point here about Obama, Don Don was uh in the break, very uh emphatic with me about that this Obama guy is not acting presidential.
If he doesn't want people calling him Hussein and calling him liberal, you know, he's he's running for president of the United States.
He's gonna sit around, he's gonna talk with people who are gonna call him worse than that.
Uh and the her point was the presidential way would be that I don't care what you call me what you want to call me.
I'm where there are far more important things out there than my name.
I'm running for president.
But he's encouraging all of this censorship, and he's thanking uh McCain and others who are enforcing this censorship on Republicans for not using uh who's uh uh uh Obama's uh Obama's full name.
So it's a good point.
He's uh he isn't acting very presidential here, but again, that doesn't matter.
See, this is the point that I continue to try to make.
It doesn't matter.
As far as as far as dissuading his supporters at this stage, those kinds of things aren't gonna work.
I've look at don't ask me, I don't know what it takes.
I have I have I've never been able to disabuse too many people of their faith in whatever it is.
I'll give look it.
Give you a couple of examples.
Perfectly harmless people, not even ideologically inclined, who have bought into Gore's movie and bought into this whole man-made hoax.
I pound them.
I don't mean uh passionately, I don't mean shouting.
I'm I just recite fact and verse.
Doesn't matter.
It's it's like shattering a um uh a worldview that they don't want it shattered.
I'd rather continue to believe what is not true because it makes them feel good because there's a faith attachment to it.
So it's gonna be very difficult here.
I'm I'm I'm gonna uh be interested to see how it is if people attempt to dissuade the Obama faithful from him.
Uh now, admitted, admittedly, this is early, and there'll be a lot happened between now and the conventions in August and September, and then when the general election starts.
Yes, uh uh Mr. Snerdling.
Mm-hmm.
All right.
All right, all right, all right, all right.
I would tend to disagree with you on this, Mr. Snerdley.
Um Mr. Snurdley says I have disabused people of their faith.
His example was Mrs. Clinton's health care plan in 1992.
We effectively dissuaded people from a faithful attachment to the concept of government-run universal health care.
It we did it over the course of many months, and with fact after fact after fact, and we I think we finally got through to people on this by pointing out what the real motivation of the people who were trying to sell this program to everybody was.
Uh but I don't know that I don't know that people had a faith attachment to Mrs. Clinton, certainly not personally, that she's never had that.
And I don't think the people had a faith attachment to the issue.
I think I think what we were dealing with there was this the the constant, ongoing, never-ending battle that the left has won, and that is convincing more and more people the government's there to do just that kind of thing.
And I think we defeated health care with ideas.
We defeated health care with how bad it was.
We defeated Mrs. Clinton.
But look where we're back here again.
We have to keep fighting this stuff.
It's now a central theme of both Hillary and Obama's campaigns.
That's why I watched this debate.
You know, and I didn't care about the specifics of her plan versus his.
I'm watching two people tell us how they are going to destroy the capitalist free market.
Not only in health care, but in all business.
And in a number of other things.
And I'm sitting here I'm transposing myself as a Democrat watching the debate, getting getting all caught up in the various uh the vagaries, the differences between the two plans, but not dis not refuting and not objecting to the premise, which is the government should provide everybody health care that it is a right.
It is not.
Health care is a privilege.
But it is not a right.
Rights come from God.
And those are they're mighty different things, but the the left has succeeded in convincing an increasing number of people that that is the uh purpose of uh of government.
Um global warming, same kind of thing.
We have a faith attachment to it.
The left, the worldwide left, have convinced billions of people around the world.
Uh billions around the world have accepted the whole concept behind the hoax of man-made global warming.
Now, in this country, only half the country believes it.
That's progress.
And Mr. Snerdley thinks that if it weren't for me, then 75% or 80% of the country would believe it, like the rest.
Mr. Sturdley thinks if it weren't for me, Kyoto would have been signed over.
Uh don't I don't know.
That not even Clinton wanted to get a sign.
He he wouldn't even send that up to the Senate.
He wouldn't even sign that one himself.
I mean, that.
Well, maybe because of me.
I now you're you're you're lavishing too much praise on me in here and giving me a little bit too much credit for things here.
But the Snerdley's point is it can be done.
Separating people from their faith, their faithful beliefs, when the faithful beliefs are bogus, uh, can be done.
But the one thing that I know, it cannot be done by agreeing with a part of the hoax to show that you're a knee uh a nice guy or what have you.
It's it's uh it's a war, and you need warriors to fight wars.
That's another reason the left's all upset.
We're the warriors out here.
Um the old Republicans has laid down and died and hope for the invitation to play golf with the Democrat leaders.
And that's when conservatism was good, and that's when conservatism was civil, and that's when we all got along.
And that's when liberal was of great word, as was communist.
And now they're dirty words and so forth.
Well, we'll keep on going here, ladies and by the way, a little little ditty here before we go to the uh the break.
This is from the Jewish Press.com.
Democrat presidential frontrunner Senator Barack Obama served as a paid director on the board of a nonprofit organization that granted funding to a controversial Arab group that mourns the establishment of Israel as a catastrophe.
Obama has also reportedly spoken at fundraisers for Palestinians living in what the United Nations terms refugee camps.
The co-founder of the Arab group, Columbia University Professor Rashid Khalidi, is a harsh critic of Israel who reportedly worked on behalf of the PLO when it was labeled a terror group by the State Department.
Khalidi held a fundraiser in 2000 for Obama's failed bid for a seat in the U.S. House of Representatives.
In 2001, the Woods Fund, a Chicago-based nonprofit that describes itself as a group helping the disadvantaged, provided a 40,000 grant to the Arab American Action Network, at which Khalidi's wife Mona serves as president.
The fund provided a second grant to the Arab American Action Network for $35,000 in 2002, and Obama was a director of this fund.
Obama was a director of the Woods Fund board from 1999 to December 11th, 2002, according to the Woods Fund's own website.
According to tax filings, Obama received compensation of six thousand dollars per year for his uh service in 1999 and 2000.
So you might be like, okay, Rush, what's the point?
Okay, so he served on a board that gave money to PLO groups.
Yeah, that's right.
What's the point?
What's the point?
Why bring all this up?
This this is just divisive.
This this is this, I'm sorry, folks.
One thing it does do, um it does, it does say Obama's got some experience.
Everybody's out there saying, oh, Barry has no experience, he got some experience.
I uh fully expect Senator McCain will apologize for me uh when he learns that I reported this story to you from the uh Jewish press.com website.
We'll be back.
Stay with us.
Okay, some audio sound bites, and then quickly back to the uh back to the phones.
Last night on CNN's election center, the drive-by's, I discussed this in the last hour, the drive-by's uh using uh uh Obama's middle name, Hussein, um uh using this flap to um mischaracterize me and insulate Obama from me.
Uh Campbell Brown and the nation's Katrina Vandenhovel, hurricane Katrina Vandenhoov.
What?
You what what did you say?
You don't like Campbell Brown?
Dawn does not let it be let it be known.
Dawn does not like Campbell Brown.
Do you know she married some big time Republican?
No, no, is she made yeah, that's right.
She married Dan Senor or Senior.
You was uh was uh what's his name?
Uh Bremer's spokesman over there in Iraq when Bremer was running the show uh shortly after we ousted uh Saddam.
Can't say his last name.
Saddam Altacriti, but we can't we can't use Saddam's last name, we can't use Obama's middle name.
Anyway, here's the exchange.
Listen to Rush Limbaugh.
Senator McCain should start pretending that liberal Democrats are conservative Republicans, and then he can cuss them out and throw them under his bus.
If McCain was unhappy with what Cunningham said, there's a better way of dealing with this than to go and throw him under the bus this way.
There's a better way of dealing with it.
Just McCain still have a conservative problem.
What's delicious is to see Rush Limbaugh and these right-wing talk radio hosts in a tizzy.
The key thing here is we're gonna see a lot of surrogate smears in this campaign, and this prefigures one of the ugliest elections we may see.
Really, on what basis involving anything involving me here, is this a smear or is this ugly?
All I said was to Senator McCann it'd be nice if you'd start treating liberal Democrats the way you treat some conservative Republicans.
Treat them as the enemy, throw them under your bus.
And hurricane Katrina Van and oh, this is gonna be so much fun.
Well, the smears, uh, this is gonna be one of the ugliest elections.
What in the world's ugly about?
This is exactly how these sanctimonious liberals try to use humiliation and embarrassment to shut people up.
The sad thing is they succeed on way too many of us, but not on me.
Then uh Chris Matthews on uh DNC TV and Nora O'Donnell had this exchange last night.
Rush Limbaugh's playing this game of saying, what's wrong with bringing up his middle name?
What's wrong with playing that name?
Is this gonna be a vicious, almost ethnic fight?
Going after the guy because of his heritage, his name, and is saying he's gonna sell us out.
Is that what's coming?
There are some Republicans and some conservatives who want it to be that fight, um, who will try and disparage uh Barack Obama, trying to paint him as a Muslim.
He is not a Muslim, he is a Christian, um, and as as someone who is anti-Israel, they are tying him to Louis Farrakhan today.
Unfortunately, that's gonna be one of the dirty storylines uh of this campaign.
And magically, or rather evilly, it has begun at the very moment it looks like Barack Obama may, may, underline may have won this fight for the nomination.
Once again, missing the whole point.
I was it was a freedom of speech issue.
Uh more than Chris, somebody on the Matthew show, somebody tell him that what this is about is why we on the right have to listen to people on the left tell us what we can and can't say.
It's not just Obama's middle name.
I don't care.
I frankly am uninterested in it.
But when he says we can't call him a liberal, I ain't gonna fly.
And by the way, nobody is linking him to Farrakhan except Farrakhan.
What are we supposed to do?
Ignore all this?
Farrakhan comes out and praises a guy, he is the savior of the world.
We're supposed to sit there.
What are we supposed to do here?
I mean, I know Obama may not be able to help who supports him, but the fact that Farrakhan supports is not us bringing it up.
So all of this, all the manners and so-called good taste, why that's supposed to apply to us.
Mean.
Meanwhile.
Yeah, by the way, hey, Chris, who was it that released that picture of Obama in the Amin Al-Zawahiri garb?
Who who was it?
In fact, that's exactly right.
In fact, Chris, I think it was the Clinton campaign who put that uh that picture out, was it not?
And who first really made a big deal of Obama's middle name?
Was it not Senator Bob Carey?
A Democrat from Nebraska.
And uh who I might add was it that ran around and talked about him selling drugs and maybe being a coke dealer.
Could that have been Bill Shaheen, another Democrat in North Carolina or in the New Hampshire?
And who was it, Chris?
Uh who um started playing the the race card in his own way.
What what did Bob Johnson, the guy from uh BET, what did he say?
Oh, that was yeah, Bob Johnson.
Oh yeah.
Uh compared Obama's past drug use to the Clinton service to African Americans.
I'm writing to apologize to you and your family personally for the uncalled for comments I made at a Clinton event.
Johnson said in a statement a few days later.
Um Bill Shaheen, the previous New Hampshire grandee and Clinton's co-chair there had told the Washington Post that Republicans would ask Obama, did you sell drugs to anybody?
I mean, you guys in the drive-by media harping on this middle name stuff, uh you had Bob Carey out there four or five times pounding it and then apologize for it some days later to keep the middle name out there.
The Clintons did all of this stuff.
The Clintons released a picture of Obama in the turban.
All these Clinton supporters were referring to Obama as a drug dealer, a drug user.
And of course, I don't recall you people wringing your hands and worrying about the nastiness of the campaign.
What I remember people on Drive by Media doing is marveling at the Clinton tactic and wondering if it would succeed or not, or wondering if it would backfire.
But I didn't see any moral judgment.
Uh coming from the drive-by media when the when the Clintons put all this stuff out.
Uh don't forget, how about the he's a Muslim email?
Nora O'Donnell and Chris Matthews, I I hope people monitoring your this show for you uh fill you in on this specifically and accurately.
It wasn't it Mrs. Clinton who had to fire a couple people from her staff in Iowa who were sending out emails referring to Obama as a Muslim.
I don't know any Republican doing that.
I do not know any talk show host referring to Barack Obama as a Muslim.
All these things that you're wringing your hands over and getting all worked into a tizzy over started in the Democrat primary campaign.
And by the way, we were right in there chastising them.
I think more so than you guys in the drive-by media were.
Dan in Pompano Beach, Florida, as we go back to the phones.
I'm glad you waited, sir.
Welcome to the program.
Hi Rush.
Um you were right.
Uh explaining before the break that if if we're exposed to ideas, uh we can be uh liberals.
Can be changed.
Uh this is my Bill Buckley moment.
Uh I was uh uh in in my early twenties, just moved to Florida from two years of uh University to Minnesota liberal uh teaching.
And uh I had a roommate who was in political science down here, and he said there's this guy Bill Buckley that's gonna be speaking in Miami Dade Junior College, and I went and uh for two hours listened to him espouse uh conservative ideas and critiquing the liberal ideas and uh it was an immediate conversion.
Um I I thought of a matter of of common sense and logical ideas compared to pie in the sky, as opposed to liberal and conservative.
And and Bill Buckley really had a a an ability to speak to young people and to relate his ideas to them with even with his intellect, And I think that's really a quality that uh that I that I see in him.
Yeah, uh absolutely you're right about that.
A lot of people uh would say he was above them, that they couldn't understand him.
Uh that you did is a testament.
But something that Buckley did, and you mentioned it here.
Uh in explaining conservatism, he explained liberalism.
And in explaining liberalism, he used the conservatism as a refutation or as a comparative, which is what we do on this program too.
Liberals say that they need we do we explain liberalism better on this program than most liberals would honestly talk about it if they came on this show.
From the subterranean depths of the EIB Southern Command, Rush Limbaugh.
And the excellence in broadcasting network.
Here's Michael in Northridge, California.
Michael, nice to have you here.
Welcome.
Hi, Rush.
Thanks for taking my call.
This this whole thing with Obama and actually liberals in general have had this conversation.
It makes me sick that if we hadn't gone into Iraq, there wouldn't be if George Bush hadn't gone into Iraq, there wouldn't be Al Qaeda in Iraq.
First of all, George Bush didn't go into Iraq.
Uh I recall there were a number of countries that went into Iraq.
It was based on their intelligence, the UN's, uh the inspectors being booted out, the 911 new reality, the fact we no longer had the uh luxury to connect the dots after the fact.
There were all those kind of the DOJ uh uh in Bill Clinton regime change.
Hey, don't forget all the Democrats had voted to go into a says Clinton included.
Yeah, absolutely.
How they try to weasel out of their vote, too, which is sickening.
Second of all, Al Qaeda's in Iraq because of the nature of war and in and in wartime there are strategic movements of enemy fronts trying to beat one side after the next.
What's not here today could be here today.
What's here today could be gone tomorrow.
Ums like an Obama speech.
Okay, but but it's absolutely true.
They weren't here today.
Uh and and the big point here, I mean there's lots of points on this.
But the big point, everyone was so concerned after 9 11.
Where are we gonna find these guys?
They're in caves.
And I say to myself, thank God, we created a magnet called Iraq, brought them all down to the caves from their caves, and now they're they're now they're uh now they're in the killing zone.
I'd rather have them on the ground than in the caves.
Excellent point.
Excellent point.
And you can't shoot what you can't find them.
And here they are criticizing us that we didn't get Obama in Afghanistan yet caves.
We didn't get Osama.
Osama.
Yeah.
See how easy it is?
Uh, you know what?
But that but here here's the bottom line.
I think we got him anyway.
But even if we didn't, he was in a cave.
I think we got him.
We just can't say we got him, because it wouldn't be strategically sound to do it.
It's better not to create a martyr.
It's better to let the bad guys think their boss is still in charge and we can do all kinds of stuff to him.
I happen to agree with you.
I've I've I've doubted the ex the uh all these uh tapes.
You never see a high deaf tape of him.
You always see these grainy pieces of crap.
Right the high def uh uh number twos.
Right, the stuff that uh Carl Rove puts together.
That's what the Democrats think.
Anyway, x excellent point.
Uh what what all this illustrates, uh, folks if you take seriously the notion that we are at great risk and that we have an enemy seriously targeting us, and that they are all over the world.
If you accept all of that, you have to conclude when Barack Obama talks about Iraq, it's dangerously incompetent and ignorant.
I don't know whether it's born of lack of intelligence or just lack of experience, and frankly, I don't care.
It's ignorant.
It yeah, what it is, of course it's flip, but but that's that's his style.
Uh that is that is his uh way of of uh re deflecting uh serious incoming fire.
He did it throughout the debate on uh Tuesday night with uh with Mrs. Clinton.
All right, now look, if you people are gonna start laughing like nuts in there while I'm engaged in the serious work of hosting this program, what is it you are laughing about?
Mm-hmm.
You can't tell me during the show.
Oh, oh, you'll tell me during the break.
Was it something that I said that I don't know I said that uh Oh, okay.
Something so something just happened outside our studio complex.
Um back to the phones.
I curiosity is piqued, but we'll wait.
Cincinnati.
David, nice to have you on the EIB network, sir.
Hello.
Hello, how are you?
Good afternoon.
Very good.
Um doing my usual thorough and comprehensive analysis and reading of the Wall Street Journal and reading the Buckley History article, I called a very liberal friend of mine and quoted something out of the article, which was the thing from uh Lap in in 1970, when Henry Gibson says, Mr. Buckley, I have noticed that whenever you appear on television, you're always seated.
Is that because you can't think on your feet?
Mr. Buckley's reply was it's very hard to stand up carrying the weight of what I know.
Which I think Well, it's very appropriate because when I called my friend who thinks knowledge is everything versus other things to be considered, uh Mr. Buckley was quite a heavyweight and quite knowledgeable.
My point and comment to ask from you is going up to the Northeast, I being in the Midwest, I run into this um theory that they know everything and probably have as much knowledge as he did.
And I think that's a far cry from the truth.
You talk about you are now you're talking about uh Northeastern elites.
Yes.
Oh, uh I couldn't agree with you more.
I I think they're so arrogant and condescending.
I don't think they've learned anything.
I I I I I I think I think their worldview is a is a uh belief in a system without much detail, without much reasoning behind it.
I I I it it's it's interesting you say it because it's very frustrating to try to talk to these people in a logical, rational way.
Facts uh actual information doesn't permeate it it it it is irrelevant to them.
Correct.
Facts do not matter.
I deal in American antiques, so I go up there to do shows, and one of the promoters after Bush got elected said that for the next four years she was gonna wear a black dress.
I mean, that's how bad it was.
Oh, yeah.
Well, how about all these clowns that uh promised to move away from the country, move out of the country and leave?
Um there look at let me tell you something.
These these these are liberals, the elite liberals you're talking about are basically a bunch of spoiled people.
But the dirty little secret is they have they have genuine contempt for conservatives and republicans.
Genuine contempt.
If if anybody is really practicing the art of hate, for example, I gave you all of the examples of the Clinton campaign and their personal attacks against Obama.
He's selling drugs, not just using them.
Uh middle name was Hussein, he may be a terrorist, Bob Carey.
And of course they go out and apologize for all this.
But notice the M.O. They put all these things in the public domain.
Uh then you have the the first Republican that happens to use Obama's middle name, the entire left has a conniption fit, points fingers, this is outrageous.
These personal attacks must stop.
Nobody has that reaction when liberals mount these attacks on others, including themselves.
Do you remember a little trivia question here?
I'm sure you all remember the Willie Horton ad.
I'm sure you all remember that it was uh uh falsely linked to Roger Ailes, that Ailes had produced it.
Uh you all remember that it was said to be bogus, that it was uh inflammatory, that it was certainly wasn't true, uh and it was this typical mean-spirited right wing racism.
Do you know who first cited what Willie Horton did at a gas station while on furlough from a m uh Massachusetts prison?
The furlough signed by Michael Dukonkis.
You know who first brought it up?
Al Gore.
It was Al Gore.
In Democrat primaries.
It was Al Gore trying to cream Dukakis who told everybody about Willie Horton.
So they put this out in the domain, and this is their M.O. They put it out there.
They all these derogatory names and slurs.
And then, of course, um when the um slurs or when the the in the case of Willie Horton, the truth uh happens to be put in the public domain and Republicans start using it, then here come the counter.
So why this is beneath contempt, racism, and hatred.
And they never hold themselves to these standards.
Uh and this is why I I just I'm I'm perplexed.
We have anybody with any brains on our side that wants to reach across the aisle to these people and try to become friends or appease them or even gain their acceptance when it's fully obvious what their efforts are, what their attempts are.
I don't know.
It's like, to draw you an analogy, it's a little bit flawed, but a good analogy would be, let's go back to the Cold War days and assume there were some Americans who were eager for Soviet agents to infiltrate American life.
I'll see you next time.
Uh we seem to have people on our side of the aisle who are eager to bring in people who despise us into our side into our party so that we can all get along for some reason, which is mystifying to me.
So they told me what they were laughing at.
Apparently people from the floor below are coming up to our floor to use our bathrooms here at the EIB Southern Command.
And this was not appreciated.
So Ryan went on her put locks on the ladies' room, and so the ladies from the second floor are using the men's room on our floor.
Is that I pretty much have this right?
And while they're out there waiting in line, they're asking for autograph pictures.
And you're laughing at.
Oh, I know why you're laughing because the security cameras, you saw them come in today and get locked out.
I can all right.
No, they're not homeless people.
They work downstairs.
What what what's down there?
Is it a law firm down there or something?
I wonder what it is.
Tony in um in San Antonio, Texas, you're next on the EIB network, sir.
Hello.
Tony's gone.
Tony split the scene.
So Julie in Kodiak, Alaska.
Hello.
Good morning, Rush.
Megadetto's from The Last Frontier, where the environment and the isolation create naturally independent, strong and conservative minds.
Thank you very much.
I like that.
I was calling today because I I heard on our our statewide news that one of the running mates for McCain being considered would be our governor from the great state of Alaska.
Talked about this uh I think yesterday or the day before.
Yeah, I think that it would create quite the paradox for your drive-by media.
Um our governor Sarah Palin is um intellectual.
She is How do you pronounce her last name?
How do you pronounce your last name?
Pay Lynn.
Sarah Palin, okay.
Yep.
She's been heralded throughout the state as being personable, likable, intelligent, strong, and conservative, and she crosses over from conservative to liberalism, not in thought, but because she stands by what she believes in, and um surprisingly enough, she has been at the forefront of ethics reform in our great state.
Yeah, plus she's uh she's a housewife, before that, she's a babe.
I saw a picture.
Well, that may you know that that that it's undeniable.
She she's undeniable, and that's why the paradox is there for me.
I think that because she's intelligent, number one, conservative, maybe number one also, but she is photodemic, she is likable, she is engaging.
When you meet her, she is interested in you.
By the way, I'm not I'm not wait a second.
I'm not diminishing any of those things by pointing out that she's a babe.
The babe is the icing on the cake aspect of it.
Some of the Democrats can't claim.
Exactly.
One of the highest Democrats that that you can speak of are uh Mrs. Bill Clinton.
You said it, not I. I just advanced the uh theory.
Well, I can tell you that um Governor Palin does not have to lift her chin up to twelve o'clock to get a good photo of her.
If you ever had a I just I just love you.
I I love you, Julie.
I I love listening to women talk about other women like this.
I am not berating uh Mrs. Bill Clinton.
I am No, of course not.
You are elevating uh you are elevating uh Madam Palin.
Exactly.
Absolutely.
She can't take a bad picture, not even from the back end.
Can't take a bad picture even from the back end.
Um all of which you say is true.
I uh it it's it's uh it's her name has been has been she is thrown up there.
She got four kids.
Uh she's I think forty-two uh years old, very conservative.
This is this I don't know how serious it is, but her name has been thrown in the uh in the hopper out there.
Look, Julie, I'm glad you called.
Thanks much.
Muskegon, Michigan is next.
You're uh you're up, Dan.
Hello.
Hi, Rush.
Uh forward, uh former mailman ditto you, right?
Appreciate that, sir.
I got a comment and then a question after that, if I could.
My comment is that uh that any one of these people running for president is gonna change our daily life simply because nationalized health care is gonna be on the forefront of their of their agenda.
And for me, that's gonna include about another two hundred dollar tax bill every six months or so.
It might be more than that, depending on whose plan.
Well, exactly.
And basically, all three of them are saying they're gonna open up the borders.
So when you have an influx of another 40 or 50 million people, that changes my daily life.
Now, wait a minute.
Wait a minute.
Senator McCain says he's not gonna open a border, says he's gonna close the border and then deal with the problem.
That's that's what he's saying now.
Well, uh, yeah, but you know, that's not what he said before.
He's an open borders guy.
Yeah.
So he said if the same if the same amnesty bill uh crossed his desk that was defeated, he'd sign it, but he said it's not going to because this is not it's not that time.
It's not the time that people don't want it yet and so forth.
But I think I think everybody ought to just brace yourselves.
I know some people don't think this is a big issue to people, and it it may be one of these issues that subsides and then regains prominence and energy.
But make no mistake, both parties are very eager to have open borders.
And at some point, somehow, some way, if the right leaders in both parties happen to ascend to the right positions of power, they're gonna try for it again.
And if they can't do it in one big bite, they'll do it incrementally.
It's something that's not gonna go away.
It's it's something both parties at uh at high levels actually uh actually want.
I heard speaking of uh, you know, how the president's gonna impact your daily life.
I heard Clinton say something the other day.
I forget where he was, but he was out on a campaign trail, and he was talking to, you know, some Hillary supporters or people he hoped would end up being Hillary supporters, and he said something to the effect the rich don't need a president.
But for those of you who do need a president, and that just it confirmed for me all the more the way liberals look at things.
The rich don't need a president, they don't need anybody, they have themselves, but you and everybody else who's not rich, why you need a president.
You need a president looking out for you.
Clinton with a little uh window into the into the brain or the mind of how liberalism actually looks and functions.
They see average Americans and they see they need a president.
They need somebody looking out for them.
They need somebody protecting them.
They need somebody getting even with the rich for them, because the rich don't need a president.
Now, this is gonna be an argument that is gonna go on in this country for as long as we have a country.
And that's the role of government and individuals' lives.
Uh and that's why you can't ever expect to win it.
You have to keep well, you can periodically dominate, but it's never going away.
The women coming up from the floor beneath ours to use our bathrooms.
Their bathrooms are fine, folks.
Don't misunderstand.
Their bathrooms are working fine.
They're just invading our space.
Export Selection