All Episodes
Previous Next
Feb. 21, 2008 - Rush Limbaugh Program
33:56
February 21, 2008, Thursday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Greetings, welcome back, folks.
Nice to have you.
It's Rush Limbaugh behind the golden EIB microphone, and as always, we are having more fun than a human being should be allowed to have.
Our telephone number is 800-282-2882.
Email address L Rushbo at EIBNet.com.
Just watching MSNBC.
They played almost the full monologue, at least two or three minutes of it from the uh from the first hour of this program, and now they are discussing Chris Matthews.
Why are we listening in a limb?
Yet the network is playing these um sound bites of me all.
It's surreal.
It is surreal.
By the way, Bill Press, uh, no intellectual giant, um, you might remember him from uh from his crossfire days.
This is a guy that can make Michael Kinsley look like a real man.
Bill Press uh has posted a um reaction to this McCain business.
I don't know what the date of this is.
Um I don't think it has anything to do with the New York Times story.
Uh I didn't find this myself.
Uh somebody sent this to me.
To all my friends, Democrats and independents who have told me they're going to consider voting for John McCain in November have only two words.
Please don't.
For the sake of God country Mother Teresa, wise up.
Now that it's clear he's going to be the Republican nominee, it's time to end our love affair with John McCain.
Remember to all my friends, Democrat and Independent.
That's who this letter is addressed at.
Bars, Bars, Barnes.
I'm sorry I got the bars, the bars are back up.
Don't feel bad.
If you were once a McCaniac, so was I. We all fell in love with the Maverick McCain back in 2000 when he beat the pants off George Bush in New Hampshire.
But the McCain of 2000 is not the same McCain we see today.
That McCain doesn't exist anymore.
Yes, McCain's a likable guy, still an American hero.
No one can ever take that away from him.
He still has a refreshing self-deprecating sense of humor, and he was once willing to tell leaders of his own party to go pound sand.
Right.
That just but they never loved him.
They said this this little Bill Peace, Bill Press piece proving my point.
Unfortunately, in order to secure his party's nomination, McCain tossed his independence out of the window.
He's no longer a maverick.
Before our very eyes, the once moderate McCain is morphed into an extreme right winger.
McCain's changed his tune on so many issues he should change the name of his bus from the straight talk express to the double talk express.
There's not one major issue the new McCain has not been on both sides of.
Even on his signature issues, McCain's all over the place.
And he talks about immigration reform and so forth and so on.
So I mean Bill Press is Bill Press, but Bill Press isn't a drive-by's.
He's a liberal, and he's one of these guys that used to have one of these love affairs with McCain.
All of this is just so utterly, utterly, utterly predictable.
Uh, ladies and gentlemen, just just.
I'll tell you these unrequited love affairs, when they go bad, they just it's so sad.
You know the title of tune here, Lou Rolls.
You'll never find another love like mine.
Absolutely right.
All right, let's move on to the uh the Democrats.
The uh Reverend Dax, hmm.
A civil rights leader, two-time presidential candidate, warned Wednesday that Democrats could hurt themselves substantially, perhaps irreparably, in November.
That would be irreparably for those of you in Rio Linda.
In November, if fallout from the clash between Obama and Hillary is not addressed quickly.
The Reverend Jackson, uh, who has endorsed Obama, but who maintains good relations with both Hillary and Bill Clinton, listed three rifts among Democrats that could allow Republicans to win in the general election.
Uh said the uh Reverend Dax.
First, we must not allow people to exacerbate black Hispanic tensions.
I think the differences are exaggerated.
You just can't characterize things as Hispanics for Hillary and blacks for Obama.
Um Jackson's second warning came over the use of superdelegates.
Uh He said if the superdelegates are substantially out of line with the popular vote, it could be very damaging.
There must be some reasonable relationship.
The two sides must be able to embrace fervently in Denver and heal campaign wounds.
So the Reverend Dax, uh, very much concerned over what uh lies in store for the Democrat Party.
You know what he's really talking about when he talks about the black Hispanic riff, and when he talks about the superdelegates, you know, he's speaking in code here because he's he's he's gotta be very, very careful with the Clintons because it's the Clintons who maintained the uh Reverend Dax's seat at the Democrat power table.
What he's really saying is here, Clintons, you gotta stop the race war.
You have to stop this uncivil war, and you gotta stop threatening to blow up the convention with the superdelegates.
He doesn't put it in those terms, obviously, but that's exactly what he's trying to say.
Because everybody knows if the Clintons go to the mattresses on this, they will blow the place up down there in Denver in order to uh secure the uh the nomination.
I have to tell you, folks, when you look at the Democrat side of this, I have I have so enjoyed these months of Hillary Clinton angst.
I have just I cannot tell you I didn't see it coming.
As you know, a year a year ago, uh actually, I think it was April last year when I so it's not quite a year ago, but it was April last year when I first came to you behind this golden EIB microphone and predicted and said to you that as we sit here today, there's an 80% chance that Hillary Clinton's an ex president of the United States.
So all of this, all of this angst and the uh the the falling apart of Mrs. Clinton's campaign was unforeseen, but I have enjoyed it.
Uh it looks to me like right now that Hillary is left with so little to fight with.
She's she's tried to uh uh cast uh Obama as this charismatic, sweet talking guy without any achievement.
Uh all that does is highlight her own lack of charisma.
It highlights her own shrill speaking manner, uh, and it it highlights that she hadn't had any achievement either.
You know, she keeps talking about 35 years.
She's been working, she's been fighting for 35 years.
Do you understand 35 years ago is when she graduated from Yale?
So what she wants us to believe is that for the for everything that she's done since she got out of college has been presidential in nature.
The problem with all this 35 year stuff is that she can't go back and say she did anything.
She'd been fighting, ostensibly, but she hasn't accomplished anything, and she and her husband ran the country, were in the White House for eight years.
Now, I'm I'm the one.
I asked this question over and over again.
What has she ever accomplished on her own?
What?
What is it that recommends her to even be qualified or seen as qualified to be presidential?
You could ask the same thing about Obama.
And the answer to both people is Zilch.
Every single thing that she has done on her own, when she is responsible for it.
Healthcare, the travel office, her presidential campaign, Paula Jones, it's been a disaster.
The woman cannot do anything right.
She just can't do anything right.
She has embarrassingly ridden the coattails of her husband her entire life, serving as uh his alter ego, his hatchet man, his enforcer.
And I, you know, looks to me like Democrats are finally coming to the realization that we came to a code twenty years ago, and that is that she's empty, she's vapid, vapid, as vapid as Barack Obama is, is just less likable.
And it's uh I I just have to admit it's fun to see, and I'll go through all these drive-by media stories about her campaign.
And they focus on Mark Penn.
They focus on Howard Wolfson.
They focus.
Everybody in a drive-by is focusing on everybody but her.
When talking of what is a problem?
What is the problem with the Hillary campaign?
Of course, well, it's the message, you know, they change your message every day.
They never ask, or they never explore in the drive-by's whether the problem with the Hillary campaign might actually be the candidate.
Sort of like you talk about baseball players and owners.
How many of you go to a ball game to watch the owner sit in his owner's box?
How many of you support a candidate because of the masterminds you never see behind the scenes orchestrating the campaign?
You vote for the candidate.
Or you don't vote for the candidate.
And yet the people analyzing what's wrong with her campaign can't seem to point the finger at her as a likely source of the problem.
Okay, opening monologue of the program today.
The monologue that MSNBC is running over and over.
They better be careful about that.
If if MSNBC is going to run that much ditto cam, some of the anchors there might lose their jobs.
Who will want to watch them after so much of me on the Ditto Cam on MSNBC.
Anyway, our uh opening monologue on this whole McCain thing is now posted.
Uh transcript audio video at Rush Limbaugh.com if you happen to miss it.
Roseanne, Greensboro, North Carolina, as we go back to the phones.
Nice to have you here.
Hi, Rush.
It's nice to talk to you.
I love you.
Hey, Rush, the the media, the talking heads, they don't get it today, but there's an emerging population out there that they're never ever going to understand, and that's the Rush Limbaugh step babies.
Imagine this, all of us who married during the Reagan administration, when morality was brought back into fashion.
And liberals are social creatures and they tend to conform to whatever they think the popular culture is.
So when morality was in vogue with Reagan, they pretended to have morality.
I know I married one of those.
I didn't know it at the time.
And then when Clinton came into office and selfishness and self-servingness became fashionable, all of a sudden we end up divorced.
And my children become a disposable item.
His children become a disposable item.
So when they go to the public schools, the great defender of the weak and the downtrodden, the public school's attitude is, oh well, these are children without a father influence.
Everybody knows what happens to children like these.
We're just harboring them until they go to prison.
You know, the great defender of the downtrodden, that's the attitude, and they make it tougher.
So then they sit and they talk about how children need a father figure.
And then these children, and I know mine aren't the only ones, they have this fantasy of a stepfather who's going to help them heal.
Well, I turned mine to the Rush Limbaugh show, and I said, here is a stepfather for you that you can rely on.
He has every trait that a good father needs.
He's reliable.
He's honest.
He's dependable.
He's 24-7.
He'll never fail you.
He'll never forsake you.
He'll never sell out his principles.
He'll never do...
He will be there.
He will be consistent.
If you don't agree with what he says, you have to admire the fact that he believes it today.
He'll believe it in 20 years from now.
He'll believe it in 40 years from now.
And he will fight for your right to have a country as established by the founding fathers.
And my children healed, and they defied the odds.
My children are, statistically speaking, part of the disposable culture that's a victim of divorce.
My son will be able to vote this year for the first time.
Now, Rush, what incentive program do you think Hillary would have to get out there in order for my son, who looks at her and realizes that she is the type of person who legitimizes the selfish and the self-serving?
Wait a minute.
I a question about that, Roseanne.
You mean your son doesn't understand the thirty-five years that Hillary Clinton has been fighting for him?
Well i i it's probably because you know, when you go to public school and you talk about God, they equate God with brainwashing.
So his conservative mother has been brainwashing him with the Bible and teaching him things like he's special because he's made in the image of God, and that this country was founded on his right to do something.
I I be I I had to quit my job to help my children to overcome this.
So when I used to go in the public school systems to advocate for them, and I made $70,000 a year, I was called missus and treat it with respect.
When I tr quit my job, I was treated like a white trash single mother.
I hadn't changed.
It was just the level of what they could get away with had changed.
And uh when I went to specialists before I did this, and they told me, they said, look, they're not gonna want to help your children.
Instead, they're gonna emotionally kick the crap out of you to get you to back down.
You have to accept this.
You have to stand, you have to cry, you have to take it on the chin, because when they're doing this to you, they're leaving your kids alone, and that's your kids' greatest hope.
Rush, the things I've had said to me, the things I've had said to me.
But my children healed and they got better.
But they never would have uh gotten better.
See, this is this is what people like their father are counting on.
He's like every liberal to some extent is an evil master at what they do.
But they count on these things.
You see, my children can't be successful because if they're successful, then he has to come to terms with the fact of what he does.
Just like Hillary Clinton.
She doesn't want to come to terms with what she does, she wants to live in denial.
She wants to hand out programs and and encourage you and me to not do anything with ourselves, because if we don't do anything with ourselves, she doesn't have to come to terms with what she is.
Well, uh maybe so, but if we don't do anything with our lives, or if other people don't, that just leaves them ripe for Hillary to uh make dependent and uh turn them into eternal voters uh for Hillary and Democrats.
You uh very perceptive out there, and you are tough.
You you you really are tough.
You uh you hung in there.
You you you took on these obstacles and refused to let them get you down.
I'm proud of you.
Uh have have you have you since remarried?
No, no.
Um I don't need to remarry, I have you.
I have you.
What do I need?
My daddy told me you gonna make the mistakes you're willing to stand before God for, Rush.
Doesn't that sound like a Rush Limbaugh comment?
Yeah, please.
Yeah, of course.
Yeah.
No, I thought I th I thought you asked me if you could make another Rush Limbaugh comment.
You can always sound like a rush com Yes, yes, yes.
You're exactly I apologize, I apologize for my hearing.
Um look at uh Roseanne, thank you very much.
Um I still get a little embarrassed hearing things like this.
But I still appreciate it.
Thank you, uh thank you very much more than you know.
Tina, New Linux, Illinois, your next.
Hello.
It's an honor to talk to you, Rush.
I'm a Jid Ohe.
Thank you.
Um I just was had something when I heard this story break on the New York Times this morning, it just bothered me so much because it reminds me almost of a replay of what happened here in Illinois four years ago um with Barack Obama and the media and they just kind of swept him in um after, you know, with breaking a scandal just two weeks before the election.
And he wasn't even.
Speaking of let me ask you a question about the New York Times story.
If you if if if you think the purpose of the story was to sweep Obama to victory, and he had a nomination yet, why not wait to run this McCain story uh until closer to the election?
I think they're running it now to put doubts in the minds of the voters so that these doubts will just play over and over and over again and wear on his ethics and wear on his morality because that's one of the things that Republicans stand for, and they're just gonna wear on people's.
Well, but now wait, did the the Times also endorsed Hillary, right?
Not Obama, isn't it?
Okay.
So guess who's having trouble out there?
Hillary.
Could it be that one of the reasons behind the story running now is simply to take people's mind and attention off of the woes of Hillary Clinton?
I mean, that's a long shot because the next meaningful primary is still some weeks away.
Uh but uh nobody knows.
Nobody can figure out why the Times ran the story now, so they're they're coming up with all these explanations.
Isn't it obvious why the Times ran the story now?
It doesn't matter when they run it.
Well known radio recontour, general all round, good guy, America's real anchor man, doctor of democracy, and truth detector, all combined as one harmless lovable little fuzzball here on the Rush Limbaugh program of the EIB network and back to the phones.
This is uh Garrett, Medford Lakes, New Jersey.
Nice to have you with us.
Oh, it's a pleasure.
Uh truly honored.
All right.
My comment was uh in regards to the timing of uh New York Times releasing this report.
I I feel that you're missing the obvious that this uh McCain finally had a good argument against Obama.
And uh Mrs. Obama stated the stupidest, the most unpatriotic thing you could possibly say, and that she's been ashamed of her country up until the point where she might be first lady.
And this is just a way of taking them off guard and getting them off the defense off of the offenses.
Yeah, you know, I knew we were gonna all kinds of theories on this today.
I'll give you another theory, because there are as many theories as there are people who want to uh concoct them.
But how about this?
How about the New York Times ran the story now because they have an eight-year history of sucking up to McCain and promoting McCain.
McCain's the greatest thing since sliced bread.
Why couldn't all Republicans be like McCain?
If they wait and run a story like this mere weeks before the election, uh they might have some credibility problems.
But if they run the story now and say, look what we just learned about the guy we were fooled by.
Now they've got time for the story to settle in, if there are any follow-ups.
Um it it and and for it to be more effective in uh derailing the McCain candidacy, if that's what the objective of the uh of the Times piece is.
I I don't think it has anything to do uh with uh with Michelle Obama, although it has taken all the other political news off the table.
Speaking of speaking of Michelle Obama, I think CNN has assigned a reporter to the Rush Limbaugh beat.
This info babe they have over there, Carol Costello, you know, does these reports on me and what happens on this program?
And she filed another one on the situation room of this uh in regards to the way we treated Michelle Obama's comments at Rushlimbaugh.com.
This this is a montage of her report about me and Michelle Obama.
The patriotism card was played against Democrats brilliantly after 9-11, and as Democrats called for our troops to leave Iraq, and it seems, Wolf, it's about to be played out again.
For the first time, I'm really proud of my country.
It didn't take long for conservative talkers to pick up on that.
Rush Limbaugh's website shouted, Michelle Obama slams America.
And after taking it on the chin for a few days, Michelle Obama clarified her comments just a few hours ago in Rhode Island.
Listen to what she had to say.
Well, you don't run for president of the United States and put yourself and your family through this if you don't feel some level of deep pride and uh possibility uh for your country.
That's right.
She said she is proud of America Wolf.
It just didn't come out quite the way she wanted it to.
It just didn't come out the right way.
Of course, they can't prove anything at the New York Times about this uh allegations of McCain, but uh they still run with it anyway.
Uh I uh uh I have no clue, Mr. Snurley wants to know what the hell was the setup about 9-11.
You know, I I uh you're asking irrelevant questions.
We're talking about CNN.
If you want to waste time trying to explain why they do what they do, go ahead.
I just I'm entertained enough by uh by airing this stuff.
Carol Costello, the Rush Limbaugh beat reporter at uh um at CNN.
I want to play a couple sound bites here of Uncle Bob, the uh criminal and scandal attorney in Washington, the uh the brother of Bill Bennett, uh who uh been hired by uh Senator McCain to deal with this New York Times story last December.
It was on Hannity and Combs last night, shortly after the Time Story hit their website.
Alan Combs said to Uncle Bob, Uncle Bob, what what what what what can you explain about these allegations in the New York Times?
Senator McCain did not want to repeat of what occurred uh years ago in South Carolina, uh namely a real smear campaign and asked me to assist him, and I have been assisting him.
What the New York Times did here uh was Shameless, just shameless.
It's almost entirely unsourced.
I investigated John McCain for a year and a half at least when I was special counsel to the Senate Ethics Committee in the Keating Five.
And if there is one thing I am absolutely confident of, is John McCain is an honest man.
I recommended to the Senate Ethics Committee that he be cut out of the case, that there was no evidence against him.
And I think for the New York Times to dig this up just shows that Senator McCain's public statement uh about this is correct.
It's a smear job.
And Alan Coleman said, uh, well, look, Uncle Bob, the uh Washington Post reported back in December that you sent prepared answers to written questions submitted by the New York Times concerning the breaking news we're discussing tonight.
Can you elaborate on that, Uncle Bob?
All of the matters that they allude to I mean, that they're not even very specific.
We answered fully uh to the New York Times.
We we showed them that there was just nothing there.
And unfortunately, they they have just obviously disregarded all of the the hard evidence that we presented.
They certainly have allowed themselves to be a vehicle for a repeat of what happened in South Carolina.
No, no, no.
And I suspect it's only because John McCain is winning so much that we are even reading this story.
They endorsed it.
What I know is that the members of the staff who were there and dealt with this lobbyist and ran Senator McCain's office, say no.
They say there's nothing to it, and they provided that information to the New York Times, and it just apparently uh didn't have much of an impact on them.
How how how in the world can you say that they did this because McCain is winning so much when they endorsed him.
The New York Times endorsed him.
Uh, ladies and gentlemen, again, let me let me repeat, you know, some of the things I open the program with because it has been a while.
Uh so many lessons here, and the the uh the the the real question is will Senator McCain learn the right lesson here.
If you want to defeat liberals, you don't join them.
You don't walk across the aisle, you don't you know bring them on your bus.
I mean, bring him on your bus if you want, but don't expect that when the rubber meets the road, they're gonna support you.
Don't exp well, you're a Republican for crying out loud.
And they are not, even when their newspaper endorses you going to vote for you.
They're not going to support you with a general, they're not going to reendorse McCain for the general election.
It isn't gonna happen.
Uh the story in the New York Times is not the story.
The story is that the drive-by media has behaved exactly as predicted, exactly as most of us understand they will react.
They picked our candidate.
We, ladies and gentlemen, the Republican Party allowed the drive-by media to pick our candidate.
Part and parcel of that process was their endorsement of McCain, and McCain was happy to get it, I'm sure.
And now we have the story today, which is whatever, it's baseless, who cares?
The whole point of the story is to try to destroy Senator McCain.
And he said he's disappointed in the New York Times.
Disappointed, he ought to be outraged.
As a caller to the program said earlier, disappointment is something that people in love feel for one another when things go wrong.
It's a family term.
It's just it uh it's so patently obvious here that this was going to happen, utterly predictable.
It's as predictable as Ted Kennedy finding a barred happy hour, that the drive-by media is going to turn on a Republican candidate, even when they have professed to love, respect, adore, cherish all of these things.
It's as predictable as the sun rising every morning.
And so, if you're mad at the New York Times, you're wasting your energy.
It's silly to get mad at something that you knew was going to happen.
It's silly to get mad at something that has happened time and time again before, and you know it's gonna happen again.
So the real question in here is is will the lesson be learned by our party?
If we want to win, if we really have an agenda that we want to advance, we're gonna have to defeat liberals to do it.
We're not going to advance our agenda by walking across the aisle sitting down with them, putting our arms around them and helping them write their legislation so that they will think we are good people.
They want to defeat us.
They have no desire for us to be anything more than a little chihuahua yapping at their heels.
They have no interest in walking across the aisle and joining us.
And if any of their guys do it, they'd rum them out of the party.
Ever heard of Zell Miller?
Ever heard of Joe Lieberman.
And yet because we have this inferiority complex, or this this, I don't know what else you would call it.
This desire to be loved and like.
We'll cross the aisle, we'll reach across the aisle, and we'll try to tell them I'm different.
I'm not like those wackos in my party.
You can deal with me.
I want to, I want to get things done.
Um and you get on TV, the drive-by's love you, they want to go on your bus, and they get on your bus, they come away dazzled, you believe that they're dazzled, you believe that they know you're different, that you're not one of those wacko conservatives, and then all of a sudden, As predictable as
anything is, they turn on the very people they have elevated in the Republican Party because at the end of the day, they want to destroy the Republican Party politically.
Which is fine.
That's what politics is, folks, except we're not playing the game.
We are actually helping them do it.
Cleaning up the messes made daily by the drive by media, Rush Limbaugh having more fun than a human being should be allowed to have.
And I mean that.
I can't wait.
Well, there's one thing I hate about waking up.
I gotta be honest, but I love getting up.
I love starting today because I never know what's gonna happen.
But I wish from the moment I got out of bed, I can leave the house.
I uh go in and do the toileters routine in the morning, I hate that.
I despise it because it's a waste of time, you have to do it, but it's it's just one of those things.
I mean, some people love getting in the shower, love getting wet, uh, love stoking, not me.
Hate it, gotta do it.
I do.
Wish it has to shave.
I'm thinking about getting what that electrolysis on the face and have to waste time shaving?
Hate that.
I despise it.
I know you can't do it.
Can't do it.
I mean, I've just wish I could.
But, you know, it is what it is.
I know these complaints are nothing compared to those of you in the subprime crisis, but just to show you I can relate.
Uh Ben in in uh factor factoryville, Pennsylvania.
Nice to have you on the program.
Hello.
How are you doing, Rush?
I um the what I thought of the first second I heard this New York Times story came out was I was thinking money on a couple of levels.
Uh I was thinking that this keeps McCain having to spend money in the primaries against Huckabee because it's gonna embolden Huckabee.
I'm thinking that's gonna leave them with less of a uh uh, you know, a war chest for the general, and on a related level, I think it has to do with circulation because the Times is laying off people.
And nothing put nothing uh gets somebody to pick up a copy of the New York Times more than trashing a Republican.
Um look at this is this is uh I I'm just marvel at all the theories that people come up with here to explain where the Times did this.
Um I'm not I'm not gonna refute your theory.
I mean it's cell papers, they gotta lay off hundred more staffers or what have you.
Uh uh they've uh brilliantly inserted themselves into the campaign.
Uh what whatever you want to say.
What one what is one more way they can increase circulation of the times, Mr. Snerdley, what would that be?
Oh, you know, so I gotta tell you this.
Speaking of uh Ben, thanks for the call.
I I appreciate it.
I love I love hearing the way people think.
I don't know that that's what I don't think it affect McCain's general election spending.
Uh that that's a different set of fendraising uh rules and so forth.
But um look at to me, folks, I mean I I I don't think it's complicated.
You can you can debate the why did the story come out now?
And you can even read the story and get all caught up in the minutia of the story.
None of that's the story.
None of that matters.
The story is the drive-by media is taking out the big maverick they used to love, the big maverick that they endorsed with a story they sat on while they endorsed the Maverick.
I mean, that's it.
It's that in a nutshell, and it was predicted by me.
And I don't mean this to be self-aggrandizing.
I don't understand why anybody's even mad.
I don't even understand why anybody's surprised.
I'm hearing all these Republicans and these McCain supporters talking about, I can't believe what the New York Times would do.
Hi, this is simply beneath contemplative New York.
It's the New York Times, and our guy is a Republican.
And there is evidence every day of how Republicans get treated and conservatives get treated in the New York Times or elsewhere in the drive-by media.
And yet people are shocked.
And people are stunned.
Now, Snerdley said if they really wanted up their circulation, they could uh do a story on me.
I'm not so sure.
Jack Steinberg did that piece on me.
He's the media slash radio TV writer for the New York Times.
He replaced Rutenberg, by the way, who wrote this story on McCain.
And they put that story, I guess that story came out Friday, Thursday or Friday.
I forget what it was, but they put it on their website as well as in the paper.
And in less than two or three hours, they had like over a thousand comments.
And Steinberg said it notes, I've never, I've never had a story posted on the New York Times website get this kind of response.
I went and looked at some of the comments, and it was hateful, deranged.
Uh it was, it was, folks, it was, it was it was subhuman.
These responses, I think if the Times does a story, I mean they might actually worry about cancellations.
Uh see, Janet Huckabee in Vegas for a middleweight prize fight.
And uh she stayed at the Hooters hotel and casino.
▲
Export Selection