All Episodes
Previous Next
Feb. 8, 2008 - Rush Limbaugh Program
33:41
February 8, 2008, Friday, Hour #3
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
And welcome back, ladies and gentlemen, broadcast excellence, authored and defined by me.
By the way, not only have I reauthored and defined Excellence in Broadcasting, we have redefined HIP on the radio.
It's Friday.
Let's go.
Live from the Southern Command in sunny South Florida.
It's Open Line Friday.
I promise we're going to get to more of your phone calls in this hour than I have gotten to previously.
But as you know, still a lot to do here.
So as we sort of continue the thrills and chills and wind down from the thrills and chills of this week, clean up the loose ends.
We'll get to your phone calls.
Telephone number is 800-282-2882.
Email address, LRushbo at EIBnet.com.
Now, just to review, folks, because it's going to be a weekend here that I don't want you to forget this.
Just to review.
The presidential race is what it's going to be.
It's going to be McCain or Hillary or Obama.
But it's also going to be enlarged, according to the conventional wisdom, Democrat majorities in the House and Senate.
It doesn't matter who is elected president because of who our nominee is.
It doesn't matter.
So the thing that you're going to have to focus on here to keep the country from moving left is to focus on House and Senate races.
Support as many Republican conservatives in both the House and Senate and your state as you can to try to limit the so-called vast increases the Democrats are expecting in this presidential election.
Look at our nominee is who he is.
If he gets elected, he loves walking across the aisle dealing with Democrats on a number of different things.
They're going to be the majority.
Presidents like to get things done, defined as working across the aisle and doing legislation that both parties think is hunky-dory.
It is what it is.
The only way it can be limited is if there are enough conservative Republicans in the House and Senate to prevent voting majorities from bill after bill after bill.
That's it.
And this is true.
I don't care if it's McCain who wins the presidency or if it's Hillary or Obama.
The point is, this is not the time to sulk and sit out and forget the election.
This is what happened in 2006.
People sat out in 2006.
I predicted, played the soundbite from October 18th of 2006, a couple of weeks before that election.
I predicted if you sit out and you turn the House and Senate over to Democrats, you're going to get a McCain Republican presidential nominee.
And that's exactly what we've got.
I played that sound, but I'm not going to play it again.
It'll be all over the website when we update later this afternoon to reflect the contents of today's program.
So that's where we are.
You know, it is what it is.
Reality is reality.
The only way to stop this is to get enough Republicans, conservatives in the House and Senate to provide a bulwark when it comes to voting on certain pieces of legislation.
Now moving on to other items in the news.
The 20th annual meeting of the nation's second most powerful homosexual activist group is welcoming some new participants.
Mike, how quickly could you find Klaus Nomi?
It's been so long since we have heard from Klaus Nomi and You Don't Know Me, which is our official gay community update theme song.
And I would like to have the Klaus Nomi official gay community update theme song.
All right, then we, because it's been so long since we have one of these, let's just do this, a gay community update and go back to the groove yard of forgotten favorites for the late, great Kraus Nomi and You Don't Own Me as our official update theme song.
The National Gay and Lesbian Task Force, ladies and gentlemen, holding its annual Creating Change Conference in Detroit this week.
Sponsors claim to have trained more than 30,000 activists since 1988.
Peter LeBarbara with Americans for Truth About Homosexual Sexuality has reported on the event in the past.
The event's handbook addresses transgender restroom etiquette.
The Democrat Party is endorsing this event where they will be presenting an award.
This is in Detroit, the Creating Change Conference.
They will be presenting an award for sadomasochism.
Sponsorship acknowledgement notes a Democrat National Committee gave at least $2,500 to help pay for the event.
The recipient of the Leather Leadership Award is Guy Baldwin.
The Leather Leadership Award.
Klaus, let it rip, Klaus.
I am the late, the great Klaus Nomi in our gay community update theme.
You don't know me.
Democratic National Committee sponsoring an event honoring sadomasochism.
The DNC giving $2,500 to help pay for the event.
The recipient of the Leather Leadership Award, Guy Baldwin, a psychotherapist who has successfully lobbied against treating sadomasochism as a mental health problem, gets an award funded by the Democrat National Committee.
This guy will have it on his resume.
He can be a future minority whip in the Democrat Party.
Last night on PMSNBC, the House organ for the Democrat National Committee, DNC-TV, Dan Abrams, celebrating the death of talk radio in front of a graphic of a gravestone that says RIP, right-wing radio, rest in peace, right-wing radio.
And he says this.
For nearly 20 years, Conservative Talk Radio has led the Republican Party's charge on hot-button issues from immigration to abortion to taxes.
So does Romney's failure show that right-wing radio has finally lost its mojo?
He had a guest, Peter Beinert, Council on Foreign Relations.
So he's just established a premise that Limbaugh is finished.
20 years, that means me.
Limbaugh is finished.
It's over with.
Rest in peace, right-wing radio asks Beinert this.
Don't you agree with me that this is just rhetoric on the part of the far right suggesting that they're not going to vote or they're not because John McCain is so horrible.
The idea of John McCain is so horrible to the far right that they're not going to vote, even if he's up against Barack Obama.
No, I don't think it is rhetoric.
I think the Republicans are not going to get the big bass turnout that they got in 2004 for George W. Bush.
Democrats are, and that's why McCain will lose.
Peter Beinert of the Council on Foreign Relations, what he's saying there is, is that talk radio may not be dead, Mr. Abrams.
The Republican base may not show up here the way they did for Bush in 2004.
Anyway, just sharing all that with you in case you missed it.
Joy in Washington, Michigan.
Thank you for waiting, and welcome to the EIB Network.
Hi, Rush.
Hi.
You're a great American.
Well, thank you.
I have this theory.
I'm going to go vote for McCain, go home, and take the hottest shower I've ever taken.
And the reason I'm going to do that, there's three evils up there.
And I'm trying to figure out who's the worst of the evil.
But I have hope and I'm not going to.
Wait, What do we talk about?
The three evils.
Well, Obama, Hillary, and McCain.
Let's not use the word evil.
Well, in the same way.
Well, look, I think it's Open Line Friday.
If you want to use the word evil, go ahead.
I'm not going to stop you.
Okay.
So what I'm saying is I keep praying and I'm saying, you know, what should I do here?
And I feel like that if we would hold, we just got to stick together, hold McCain to the fire, not let him get away with this, and everybody get out and vote and show the Democrats that we can get together and we can change things.
And if we will vote for our Senate, our congressman and that, that, you know, if we hold him to his, you know, to his word, we've got to make him do that as conservatives.
And I think if we could do that, maybe we can change some things.
Otherwise, if we just give it to the Democrats and say, okay, the next four years, the only problem is it'll take 30 years to undo what they've done.
You see, Limboy.
You see?
You see?
They think I can hold my feet to the fire.
I'm the Maverick.
I'm not Maverick.
Nobody holds my feet to the fire.
Nobody holds my feet to anything else.
Not if the enemies couldn't do it.
What makes this woman in Washington, Michigan thinker she can?
I don't know.
I'm just praying.
I'm doing a lot of prayer.
Now, the way to do this, you're going to have to have conservative Republicans in the House and Senate do this.
That's one of my themes today.
I hate being a broken.
I hate repeating things over and over because I feel like I'm short-changing you people, but the die is cast for the presidency in the next election.
On most issues, there are going to be some exceptions here, but on most issues, we're going to go left.
And it's not, this is really not so much an indictment of McCain as it is acknowledgment of reality who's going to be running Congress.
The Democrats are going to be running it.
The idea is to keep their governing majorities, their voting majorities, as small as possible.
That's why Dingy Harry cannot get anything done in the Senate now.
He cannot get the 60 votes.
But if the Democrats have 55 votes after this next time around, you could couple that with the Olympia Snows and Susan Collins's and, you know, the liberal Republicans that could easily Dingy Harry can get the 60.
And if we have a president, a Republican president, if this happens who's inclined to work with Democrats to get things done, then this is not pessimism, folks.
I'm charting the course of reality here for you, telling you the way things are going to shape up.
Not only to help you deal with it emotionally, but to offer strategeries here to try to blunt what's going to happen.
Throw McCain out.
If it's Hillary or Obama with these Democrat majorities, it's going to be a little bit more left than it would go with McCain, but it's still going to go left.
It's going to go left big time.
And I actually think that with either Hillary or Obama, the Republicans in the House and Senate are going to be a lot freer to stand up and shout and stop and call them what they are.
We're not going to take this country to the socialist left, President Obama.
It'd be much easier for him to say that.
No, I'm not signaling how I'm going to vote.
I'm just telling you, I'm giving you reality.
You know, it's one of the problems.
This is why I'm getting his hate mail lately.
People, reality is just, it's too hard.
It's harsh.
You want to live in the world of hope.
Fine.
You live in the world of hope.
I'll live in the world of reality.
And I'll meet you at reality when you run out of hope.
You can count on where I will be.
Kelly in Denver, welcome to the EIB Network.
Hello.
Rush, thank you very much for taking my call.
Honored to talk to you.
Thank you, sir.
El Mucho.
A little nervous today.
Proud member of the cutting edge.
Over the last few weeks, it just seems like you're not saying something, that you've got something on the back of your mind that are maybe right on the front of your mind, but you're not saying it yet.
And I talk with the owner of the company that I work with in the morning, and topics usually turn to.
You mean the guy who lays people off.
No, no, no, no.
Quote unquote, Governor Puckett.
No, sir.
I am an independent contractor.
But you've said several times in the last few weeks that we have to endure a Carter to get a Reagan.
And you sort of leave it hanging for us to ponder and think about.
And I'm just wondering if something like this might be in play.
I don't know what the relationship is between Newt Gingrich and John McCain, but is there a possibility if McCain, well, McCain's going to win nomination for us, of a McCain-Gingrich ticket?
Um, don't think it's in the cards.
Hear the names I'm hearing.
I'll tell you the names I'm hearing.
I'm hearing at the top of the list, Tim Paulenti, the governor of Minnesota.
That's a liberal state.
McCain would want to win it.
I'm hearing Mark Sanford, South Carolina.
But that might be problematic because McCain carries grudges and Mark Sanford did not endorse him in 2000 in South Carolina.
And it was huge there.
He was in Congress.
Charlie Christ, governor of Florida, who wants it so bad.
He wants it so bad.
And he's owed because the drive-bys, the political pundits are saying if it weren't for Christ's endorsement of McCain on the Saturday before the election, McCain would have lost to Romney.
And a lot of people are putting credence in that.
You know, Romney at one point a 10-point lead in Florida.
And then that Saturday before the election, McCain came out with a lie about Romney in the timeline.
Christ came out and endorsed him with some voters in Florida.
Chris is pretty popular because he's trying to cut property taxes and so forth.
So he's on the list.
But McCain may not need Florida.
I'll tell you somebody else on the list is Richard Burr, a senator from North Carolina, but McCain doesn't need North Carolina.
I'll tell you, you know, I'm going to give you a name that would make me jump for joy is not going to happen because he's not been Bobby Jindal.
I did an interview with he is the next Ronald Reagan.
If he doesn't shave, Bobby Jendahl, the new governor of Louisiana, is the next Ronald Reagan.
He's young.
He was just sworn in for his first term.
He's the guy that beat the liberal Democrat machine throughout Louisiana.
He did it 100% conservatism.
We interviewed him for the Limbaugh letter about three issues ago.
And it is, in fact, I am hereby ordering the editrix of the Limbaugh letter, Diana Schneider, to make, since it's a past issue, make the interview with Bobby Gendall in the Limbaugh letter available at rushlimbaugh.com this afternoon.
Now, you can send it up to Coco as a PDF file or text or whatever you want.
This guy could be the next Ronald Reagan.
If McCain chose him, here's a southern state.
This is Louisiana.
But I think he may be too conservative for McCain.
Now, it depends on who they think McCain will need or want.
But Jindal's very young, and he's only in his first year as governor and doesn't really have...
He came from the House of Representatives.
Being talked about as Haley Barber, the governor of Mississippi, but it is said by those in touch with the conventional wisdom that Haley's got too many lobbyist ties for McCain.
These are some of the names.
There are others that I can't think of right off the top of my head, but they're out there.
But I don't think it would be Newt.
Well, Newt is the guy that I was thinking could possibly be the next dragon.
Yeah, a lot of people are harboring fantasies about Newt.
I haven't read his new book yet.
The owner of our company.
I've got a couple copies in the back seat of the car.
Back in just a second.
You know it.
And I know it.
A couple other news items.
This from yesterday.
I didn't have a chance to get to it.
This Dr. Rowan Williams, the Archbury of, the Archbury of Canterbury, the Archbishop of Canterbury is losing it.
This is the guy who first cast doubts on the whole concept of the moving of the still star over Bethlehem around Christmas time and then began talking about it.
Well, you don't really need to believe in the resurrection to be a Christian.
Yes, you do.
Now that, have you heard about this?
This guy is back.
The Archbishop of Canterbury said yesterday that the adoption of Islamic Sharia law in the UK is unavoidable and that it would help maintain social cohesion.
Rowan Williams told BBC Radio 4's World at One that the UK has to face up to the fact that some of its citizens do not relate to the British legal system.
Muslims could choose to have marital disputes or financial matters dealt with in a Sharia court.
He added, Muslims should not have to choose between the stark alternatives of cultural loyalty or state loyalty.
He said there was a place for finding a constructive accommodation in areas such as marriage, allowing Muslim women to avoid Western divorce proceedings.
This is what you get when you have unchecked, unbridled liberalism.
By the way, this is liberalism disguised as an archbishop, as a religious figure.
Liberals will give away the culture and the freedom of Western democracies.
They will give it away for whatever reasons.
Who cares?
All you need to know is they will give it away.
And people like this, William Rowan, are not isolated.
They're not alone.
Lots of these kinds of people who think this way in this country.
From the Investors Business Daily editorial page.
Not every scientist is part of Al Gore's mythical consensus.
Scientists are now worried about a new ice age because the sun's activity is slowing down.
You know, sun activity is cyclical.
We have always maintained on this program as common sense scientists that the sun has to be the predominant factor in global warming.
Now, Kenneth Tapping, a solar researcher and project director for Canada's National Research Council, is looking at the sun for evidence of an increase in sunspot activity.
Solar activity fluctuates in an 11-year cycle, but so far in this cycle, the sun has been disturbingly quiet.
The lack of increased activity could signal the beginning of what is known as a maunder minimum, an event which occurs every couple of centuries and can last as long as a century.
Such an event occurred in the 17th century.
The observation of sunspots showed extraordinarily low levels of magnetism on the sun with little or no 11-year cycle.
The solar hibernation corresponded with a period of bitter cold that began around 1650 and lasted with intermittent spikes of warming until 1750.
In frigid winters, cold summers during that period led to massive crop failures, famine, and death in northern Europe.
In addition to that, ladies and gentlemen, this is all over the news today, by the way.
It's in the New York Times.
Do you know that ethanol and biofuels now are causing global warming?
Converting land for biofuel worsens global warming.
Yes, it's true.
Thank you, liberals.
Clearing raw land to produce biofuels actually contributes to global warming by emitting large amounts of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere, researchers warned on Thursday.
In thinking typical of Rowan Williams, the Archbishop of Canterbury, liberals are authoritarianists and they are in the business of denying freedom.
David Suzuki has called for political leaders to be thrown in jail for ignoring the science behind climate change.
At a Montreal conference last Thursday, the prominent scientist, the broadcaster in Order of Canada recipient, exhorted a packed house of 600 to hold politicians legally accountable for what he called an intergenerational crime.
Through a spokesman, said yesterday, the call for imprisonment was not to be taken literally.
Dr. Suzuki reportedly made similar remarks in an address at the University of Toronto last month.
Doesn't mean it, yes, I'm afraid he does.
And he wants, get this, he wants to take decisions on global warming in government away from politicians and put it in the hands of scientists, who, of course, are not governed by politics, are they?
That's what liberals do.
This is who they are.
They're telling us every day.
Pat in Muskegon, Michigan.
I'm glad you called.
Nice to have you here on the EIB network.
Hello.
Yes, hi, Rush.
You know, I've been a fan of yours for over 20 years, and you're making this so frustrated.
I swear at my radio every day lately.
You know, how you can possibly say it doesn't make any difference whether Hillary or Obama is elected or if McCain is elected, there are so many things that are coming up.
There's very possibly going to be two Supreme Court judges that are going to have to be nominated.
He has the pro-life, he's, excuse me, I'm losing my voice.
He has a good pro-life record.
He would vote for partial birth abortion.
He has an 82% conservative rating with the American Conservative Union.
Wait, wait, wait, wait.
Look, it's pointless to argue about McCain.
He's the nominee.
But I'm just telling you that.
He opposes a constitutional amendment on abortion of any kind and on same-sex marriage.
He opposes it.
Can I tell you something about Henry Hyde, who I loved dearly?
Henry is the one that proposed the Human Life Amendment.
He didn't bring it up because he knew they were in enough votes in the House to do it.
You know, I'm a Reagan conservative.
I served as an alternate delegate for Reagan in 1980 and had the wonderful privilege of actually casting electoral vote form in Illinois.
That's right.
I worked with Philip Slaffee to fight the ERA.
So I am a conservative, believe me.
I don't doubt you.
What are you mad at me about?
Because you're encouraging people.
You have been attacking McCain relentlessly.
And I agree with you.
I was angry with McCain about all the same things you are.
But when it comes to the final thing, commander-in-chief, do you really think that Hillary or Obama would be a better commander-in-chief than John McCain?
And this is a very perilous time we're in.
The Middle East is like a powder keg, ready to blow up any minute.
I've answered this question.
I will answer it again if you really want to hear it.
But I don't think it matters because the die is cast.
I'd rather go back to your Supreme Court thing.
Okay.
You've heard my focus today.
Yes, I have.
And I agree with you.
We've got to get out and get started.
All right.
You haven't heard me tell people to vote against McCain today.
You've heard me assume he's going to be elected president.
I know, but you're saying that doesn't make any difference.
And I think it does make a difference.
On a host of things, it isn't.
This has been the point all along.
Just be patient.
We'll talk in a year and you'll see what I'm talking about.
You know, I agree with you about getting orders to be aware.
Here's the thing.
Let's stick with your business on abortion.
You're right.
There is predominantly one thing a president can do to affect Roe versus Wade, and that's the appointment of justices.
U.S. Supreme Court.
Right.
Now, let's assume that we get a larger majority of Democrats in the Senate.
And let's assume the Senate Judiciary Committee has something like picking round numbers, 11 Democrats, seven or eight Republicans.
John McCain nominates the people he says he's going to nominate.
C. Pick one.
Somebody like Alito, somebody, well, let's do it.
Somebody like John Roberts, all right?
Now, here come the Democrats.
They probably won't even have to fill a buster.
They'll have the votes to stop it.
What are we going to do?
They will have the votes to stop this.
They are not going to sit by with if they have significant majorities in the House and Senate, they are not going to sit by and allow those kinds of judicial nominees to end up on the court.
They will fill a buster.
They'll do whatever they have to do.
Now, are the Republicans in the Senate going to now go with the nuclear option since the guy who stopped the nuclear option and who could have prevented these filibusters in the first place is now the president?
You know, can I speak to that?
Because originally, I agreed with you.
I was mad because I thought, why are they taking that away?
But then the more I think about it, it was smart because you've got the numbers mixed up.
We're the ones that would have to filibuster if we can hopefully get at least a majority to stop the 60.
Look, you're missing my point.
It's probably my fault.
My focus here is to prevent the Senate.
I'm granting you that McCain's going to nominate justices that you like and that we would all want.
Right.
And you're saying that they won't get confirmed.
I'm telling you, it's going to be hell to get them confirmed.
And the last thing in the world the Democrats are going to want that happen is, especially if they lose the White House, do you know what a tear they are going to be?
Do you, they are going to be frosted.
They have had the presidency in their back pocket for the last two years.
They think it's a fait de compli.
Right.
And they think it's an even greater fait accompli now that McCain's been nominated.
They think he's going to be easy to beat.
You and I disagree on one thing.
Well, but we don't have to.
I'm stipulating he wins the presidency.
I'm not trying to undercut this now.
Listen to me.
I'm just telling you, I'm trying to prepare you to get frustrated as hell when he nominates the judges you want and there aren't enough Republicans in the Senate to confirm them.
And when McCain's habit is to reach across the aisle, work with Democrats to make them happy, he hasn't reached it within his own segment to keep conservative Republicans happy.
I'm just telling you, this is why I've been saying today, get as many Republicans elected as possible to the House and Senate to try to keep these Democrat majorities down so as to get these judges confirmed because that's where it's going to happen is in the Senate.
Well, I agree with you on that, Rush.
Let's also get McCain elected because it will make a big difference.
I love your rush.
I love you, too.
Please don't keep attacking McCain.
We've moved on.
The primaries are over.
It is what it is.
I'm talking to you today with the hypothetical that he wins the presidency and what is likely to happen as a result.
Let's see.
I better take a break.
I'm looking at the clock.
I've got to take a break.
Look, Pat, thanks for the call.
I understand you're being irritated with me, but I don't think you're really irritated with me.
I think what you're irritated with is that I am telling you, I'm giving you, I'm laying out for you reality, and it's not what you envisioned supporting McCain or any other Republican in this roster, frankly, probably.
We'll be back in just a second.
I'm going to give you a little tip, folks, because I care about you.
We talk about David Brooks at the New York Times here a lot.
If you want to know what Senator McCain is going to do as president, read David Brooks' column in the New York Times.
I'm not sure what days of the week it comes.
I think it comes up twice a week.
But read David Brooks in the New York Times.
David Brooks is the McCain Talking Points memo.
That's what it is.
And you'll get an idea what McCain is going to do.
Now, I'll tell you something else I'm going to do, folks.
Next week, because I have to run out of here today, but next week, when I finish the program, I'm going to record some thoughts that I would love to tell you right now, but I'm not going to.
And I'm going to put them in a time capsule.
And we're going to find a way to accurately date and timestamp them.
And in about a year from now, I'm going to play them for you.
No, no more hints, Mr. Snerdley.
I said, I'm just going to put some thoughts in a time capsule, date and stamp them.
Not long, won't be longer, a couple, three minutes.
The appropriate time, we're going to open a time capsule and let you hear what I recorded next week, a year from now.
One other thing.
That last nice lady, the last caller, Pat from Muskegon, Michigan, is that right?
I'm not attacking Senator McCain today.
I've been doing just the exact opposite of that.
But I want to say to a lot of you here, I'm interested in party loyalty.
And, you know, she got on my case for saying there's not going to be any difference between an Obama or a Hillary or a McCain presidency.
She cited judicial appointments, and I have to grant her that.
I mean, they're not going to be total similarities.
But Hillary Clinton would make a good president.
Yes, you heard right.
Hillary Clinton would make a good president.
And in the interest of party loyalty, I say this because Senator McCain has said it.
And I'm not undercutting Senator McCain anymore.
The primaries are over.
Well, they're not over, but I mean, he's the presumptive nominee.
And I'm not going to sit here anymore.
I'm not going to listen to drive-bys and all these other people in the Republican Party say I'm tearing a party apart.
So if Senator McCain says that Hillary Clinton will be a fine president on this program, she's going to be a fine president.
I too can do party unity as well as anybody.
I can get on board the bus.
Bob in Columbus, Ohio.
Welcome to the EIB Network.
Hello.
Thanks, Rush.
Cincinnati Bearcat Dittos.
Thank you, sir.
Enjoy the program and your arguments and share most of your opinions.
I'm calling, though, to take exception today to your premise and repeated emphasis of the re-electing the Republican senators and House members, as well as your kind of your I Told You So message about the 2006 election that, hey, this is what we're going to get if we re-elect these folks.
If, well, in order for the pendulum to swing right again, it's got to finish swinging left.
And re-electing these rhinos that are out there, these Democrats in drag, if you will, it's not going to stop that pendulum.
Oh, no, that's not.
No, I agree with you.
That's not what I meant.
I meant to work for as many conservative House members and Senate members as possible.
And it may not succeed wildly this year, but this should be an ongoing effort, an ongoing project.
And I also pointed out that you're going to find these, ask people to pay attention to their state legislatures, to find the state senators and the state representatives who are voting against tax increases and all these things that we find conservative and support them and inspire them to run for higher office.
But I'm not suggesting re-electing the same old rhinos that are going to go along with the Democrats.
In some cases, we're not going to have any choice because some of them are not up for re-election.
I couldn't agree more.
I mean, we bounced the wine out of Ohio here.
He was part of that gang of 14.
I think, correct me if I'm wrong, I think Boinovich may have been also, and he's up this term.
If Boinovich wasn't part of that gang, I know he was standing on the floor crying literally tears when W was trying to get Bolton appointed.
No, I know.
I know.
This is we get who you vote for.
You get who you vote for.
We're going to get who we vote for.
Look, I have to run here, Bob.
I appreciate the call.
I have to run, folks, big weekend ahead, but we'll be back on Monday to deal with the thrills and spills and the chills of the weekend, clean up whatever drive-by media messes that have been made.
I look forward to it.
See you then.
Oh, not yet.
Okay, folks, enjoy the news.
Have a good weekend.
I'll see you back here on Monday.
Clean up the messes made over the weekend by the media.
▲
Export Selection