All Episodes
Previous Next
Jan. 10, 2008 - Rush Limbaugh Program
34:12
January 10, 2008, Thursday, Hour #1
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome to today's edition of the Rush 24-7 Podcast.
Hiya, folks, and welcome.
Great to have you with us.
The fastest week in Media Rush Limbaugh, the EIB Network, already on Thursday, and three hours of broadcast excellence straight ahead.
The telephone number, if you'd like to join us, is 800-282-2882, a new email address, Lrushbow at EIB net.com.
Okay, do you remember yesterday's program, folks?
If you weren't here, Tisk Tisk, very sad.
For those of you who were here, it was I, L Rushball, once again explaining what happened in New Hampshire.
Not with the polls so much, although I do have another C I told you so on that.
Um but yesterday I was explaining why it was that women came out in droves for Hillary Clinton.
And after I made my explanation, and it was quite detailed and it was unique.
You weren't hearing it anywhere else in broadcast media.
I cannot tell you the number of good natured emails I got from people saying, you know, this is hilarious, and many of them were women.
This is hilarious listening to you of all people talk about women, listening to you explain women.
This is the funniest thing I've heard.
The only woman who thought that I that I talked to that thought I had a point was Dawn.
Uh, and even she was somewhat on the fence about this.
I mean, I even got grief from the lovely and gracious cookie up in New York about the hormones in the zit line.
Uh, that would be might be uh Mrs. Clinton's next technique because she can't cry but one time here.
So I have assembled here in my stacks of stuff, all of the evidence that has now been forthcoming from angry women columnists from as far away as the UK, whose columns and comments and blog posts confirm virtually everything I said yesterday can be summed up this way.
Women did not come out and support Hillary because it was chick-to-chick.
It wasn't that, it wasn't gender.
It was they need vindication.
They want revenge, and they like saying, Screw you, mister.
Women rallied around because they thought Hillary was being mistreated by a bunch of guys.
And, you know, you can you can watch Desperate Housewives, you can see women be vicious to each other, and women love watching that stuff.
And they love watching the evil female villains on soap opera get away with the day.
Sit there and eat that up.
What a man does, it's a whole different thing.
This, ladies and gentlemen, I know.
And I'm gonna prove this to you.
We even have a theme song for this update, Bill Clinton, ripping off Roy Orbison here.
It's Paul Shanklin with the vocal.
Paolo Conti.
All right, let's just get started here with the stack, ladies and gentlemen.
First from Libby Brooks.
Never heard of Libby Brooks, writing in the Guardian UK, American psychos.
There's an item lurking in the corner of our office that's been annoying me for ages.
A gift from one of our Washington colleagues, about 10 inches tall, dressed in a sharp gray suit, metal spikes between her splayed thighs.
Yes, it's the Hillary Clinton Nutcracker.
And it's truly hilarious.
You too can dominate the Ice Queen from the comfort of your kitchen while opening seasonal produce.
I have one of these Hillary Nutcrackers.
Somebody gave me one of these for Christmas.
Have you seen one?
You see one of these things?
It's hardly news, writes Ms. Brooks, that Clinton is and always has been a complex and polarizing figure.
This contest is as much, if not more, about personality than it is about politics.
So it's entirely legitimate to critique her public persona, to assess her perceived cynicism and coldness, to query her cross-generational appeal, or how she plays to a female audience.
That's politics.
Most of the American feminists I know aren't planning to vote for her.
I've not heard a single one argue there exists some higher sisterly duty to support Sintna Clinton simply because she's a woman, but more than ever now, it's worth recalling the toxic drip drip of low misogyny that Clinton has endured since she announced her candidacy, simply because she's a woman.
This has been evident not only in the feated realm of the right-wing blogosphere, but on national networks in the country's most august newspapers, because that's not politics, it's woman hating.
Now telling you the purpose of this stack is to tell you that I called this yesterday.
I told you what this was all about.
I got female people all over the country, all over the world writing pieces about this, confirming that I, Il Rushbow, according to many good-natured emails yesterday, no Zilch Zero, not a diddly squat about this.
Mid-December, a particularly unflattering photograph of Clinton campaigning in Iowa was posted on the Drudge Report under the headline, the toll of the campaign.
It was picked up by talk show host Rush Limbaugh, who asked his audience, will this country want to actually watch a woman get older before their eyes on a daily basis?
Maybe Limbaugh deserves a get out of jail free card, given he lives in a country where it's near compulsory for women in the public eye to endure botulism in their facial contours and elevated hairlines, but actually, rush, wrinkles do happen, and that's what a 60-year-old woman looks like, not even on a bad day.
I know Libby, and we don't want to have to look at him every day.
This is the point.
So to recap, Hillary is too masculine but also too feminine, too icy and too emotional, too sexy, but then nowhere near sexy enough.
What with being ancient of years, too calculating, too stupid, too BI itchy too, witchy too, oh what's the word too female.
That's piece number one.
Pete I just I just I said it once.
Why would I why would I abandon it now?
The sun, the s would you just calm down in there?
When I say we, I mean society.
Did you hear me say I?
Chill.
Just chill in there.
The Reverend Jackson Jr. has also come out and become critical of Mrs. Clinton.
He went on PMS NBC, appeared to question Hillary's tears, which he called tears that melted the granite state, adding that those tears moved voters.
He also suggested Hillary was crying about her appearance.
One key quote from Jesse Jackson Jr.
Yeah, those are tears that Mrs. Clinton cried on that day, clearly moved voters, but somehow connected with those voters.
But those tears have to be analyzed.
They have to be looked at very, very carefully in light of Katrina, in light of other things that Mrs. Clinton did not cry for, particularly as we head to South Carolina, where 45% of African Americans who participate in a Democrat contest, and they see real hope in Barack Obama.
Jesse Jackson Jr.'s point here is that we might want to analyze all the times that Mrs. Clinton did not cry, the things that did not move her to tears.
Hurricane Katrina is his big item.
Bill Cheating, Bill Cheating, Bill Cheating, Bill Cheating, Bill Cheating, Monica Lewinsky, 9-11, the Oklahoma City bombing, none of these things cause tears.
But a according to Jesse Jackson Jr., but when a woman asked her, how do you do it?
Now people are wondering if that was a plant.
I have another theory here.
Now this, I'm sure this is this is going to offend some of you.
It's not going to stop me from saying it.
Again, I'm talking here about liberal women.
Liberal women have pretty much proven that they are emotional wrecks.
And that they also have some problems that go beyond that.
I want to point out one more thing about that Hillary Klein crying clip to prove this.
Part of that tape that always gets cut cut off is a little testimonial.
You know, how do you do it?
The question was about her hair.
How do you do this every day?
And one of the things that we don't see very often in this clip is about how hard Mrs. Clinton says it is to eat right and exercise on the road while campaigning.
Now that I think resonates too with a whole lot of women.
See, Dawn's nodding in agreement here.
Let me tell you what, this is the single biggest reason Ultra Winfrey caught on.
Single biggest reason.
This is just my theory.
This is just my theory.
It was when she went on that that first diet of hers.
Remember this?
And she came out thin as a rail, tight pair of jeans, she was pulling a red wagon full of some kind of animal fat that represented the weight that she had lost.
And that was magic.
I mean, she was doing well up to that point.
No mister Stan.
The show was not foundering.
She was doing well up to that point.
But that show and the issue pushed her into the rare air of popularity heights.
Women on the left, liberal women, emotionally needy, who think they're overweight, tend to love that talk about how hard it is to be fat, and then all the excuses that keeps them that way.
And they get obsessed with losing weight.
So while everybody else is still blabbering about the crying, which wasn't crying, the real reason is that Hillary admitted in public her problems with weight control.
That is another uncommented on facet of this.
You and you and you add to it that it is men that are making all these fat comments and uh insulting comments far as women are concerned.
Here's another piece, Catherine Fenton.
What happened in New Hampshire?
A roar.
This is from the BuzzFlash dot com website.
Uh and this piece proves almost totally what I had to say yesterday about all this, but I have to take a quick time out here, folks.
Time's flying, first segment in the can.
Back with more in a second.
Back to the stack, demonstrating how on the money I was yesterday and way ahead of the train.
Way ahead of the curve.
Jody Cantor in the New York Times, women's support for Clinton rises in wake of perceived sexism.
At work, Ms. Six said she listened to male colleagues make fun of Mrs. Clinton for choking up at a campaign appearance in New Hampshire.
She is over one of my male corleagues chortled, she said.
With that, Mrs. Clinton may just have earned my vote, Ms. Six said.
I don't know if I was super conscious of the gender factor in the race before then in New Hampshire.
These hecklers said iron my shirt.
Mrs. Clinton the only candidate whose critics complained about the pitch of her voice.
For many women, these moments are deeply personal.
Though Sarah Krepps, 31 moving to New York, said she would vote for Obama seeing Mrs. Clinton debate was a reminder of her time in the Air Force.
The discomfort of being the sole woman in a group of men, the criticisms of Mrs. Clinton's voice took Ms. Reese back to the time her boss pushed the mute button on a conference call to tell her her voice was too shrill.
Other women mentioned how they were shocked to see how the only female candidate was perceived by some voters.
For Jody Cohen, 31, a recruiter in Orange County, California was the relative who recently told her that he admired Bill Clinton but would not vote for his wife because she had stayed with her husband after the Lewinsky scandal.
Another woman, 31, a lawyer in New York, a supporter of Mrs. Clinton, said she heard the criticisms all the time.
They punish the woman who stood by him, but they forgive the adulterer himself.
This was screw you, buddy.
This was screw you all these women who have been dying for years for whatever reasons.
To tell the men in their lives, whether they're married to them, relationship with them or just work with them, who make fun of Hillary with this was their chance to fight back.
Catherine Fenton.
A roar went up in New Hampshire yesterday.
Did you hear it?
I'm not a Hillary or an Obama backer.
As an actual liberal, I'm supporting Edwards, and yet something was stirring inside of me this week.
Every time I turned on a cable news station, I was greeted with a smirking, overweight man.
He had many different names, but he was always wearing the same smirk, and he was mocking Hillary.
Laughing at her, demeaning her.
It was her voice.
It reminds men of their wives' voices.
Well, how many women knew that a man being reminded of his wife's voice qualified as a traumatic experience for him?
Oh, she's playing the victim, using tears.
Men hate when women do that, do they?
Do they also hate when George Bush cries?
He has, you know.
What are we being told here?
Women's tears are manipulative, men's are real.
See, folks.
This I spotted yesterday.
And still, she continues, I found myself wondering if I shouldn't vote for Hillary Clinton anyway.
I didn't like this.
It reminded me of every time my brothers had mocked me growing up, made me feel like just a stupid girl.
It reminded me of every these are liberal women writing these things.
You gotta keep this in.
That's who I was talking about yesterday.
It reminded me of every man who had made me feel unfeminine when I got angry or impassioned over something important, of every man who didn't take me seriously.
Screw you, buddy.
Screw you, mister, the overriding theme of the female vote.
I have another theory about it.
I actually think that what happened is a bunch of non-feminists showed up to support Hillary based on a theories that I have espoused.
Ms. Fenton continues, so I watched first with interest and with a growing sense of pride and solidarity.
Finally with yes, tears in my eyes, as women came out in force in New Hampshire and roared.
No poll predicted this.
The pundits are flummoxed.
Could it be racism?
Did whites pull their old trick of yeah, I'm gonna vote for the black guy, I'm not a racist, and then pull the white lever in the privacy of the booth?
Yesterday they showed up at the polls in New Hampshire, they roared.
Did you hear them, Chris Matthews?
Did you hear them Tim Russert?
Did you hear them Christopher Hitchens?
Did you hear them Rush Limbaugh?
And yes, you, Maureen Dowd.
Don't think we haven't noticed you over on the op-ed pages of the New York Times, wasting one of the few powerful perches women have in print media with your sly antifeminism.
Did you hear them modo?
Catherine Fenton in New York.
And then of course Chris Matthews.
Chris Matthews did say some things here that um uh did somewhat go over the top.
And as you can sum up what Matthew said by saying, Well, you know, she's only a presidential candidate because Bill messed around.
The reason the reason she's a U.S. Senator, the reason she's a candidate for president, the reason she may be a front runner is her husband messes around.
That's how she got to be senator from New York.
We keep forgetting it.
She didn't win it on the merits.
Women hear these things.
These liberal women hear these things, and it it sends them off into orbit.
Uh and so people be making the mistake here if it was women to women.
If it was simply because you know, the Hillary did play a gender card of sorts, but it wasn't so much the gender card as gee, all these guys attacking me, and I'm just so innocent and sweet.
Now she can only do this one time here, folks.
And since she can only do it one time, is this is this uh effect, if you will, going to r uh present itself again, say in further states, when they get to South Carolina, when they get to Nevada.
Are the women still gonna be outraged over this and still support Hillary, or will they need another event like this to show solidarity and tell men where to go?
So it could be a one-time phenomena.
We'll have to wait and see.
Back in just a second.
Now I'm spending I'm spending this amount of time on it because it's instructive.
Uh you know, I uh I I love analyzing what people do, but also why.
You know, what are the uh psychological and other factors, motivations that cause people to do what they do.
You gotta you have to understand that if you want them to behave in a different way.
Uh and clearly, here you had the this and drive-byes are calling this woman in Portsmouth, New Hampshire, why I forget what her name is, Pernod Pernod Youngers, whatever, and then they ask her, were you a plant?
Because she's the one, and she said, No, I'm not a plant.
I just showed up and she said it's amazing to me what asking one compassionate question, saying one compassionate sentence, uh can do.
And that made me think of something.
Um she voted for Obama.
The woman that asked Hillary this question voted uh for Obama.
But look at what happened here for the first time since 1992 when Hillary burst upon the national scene, for the first time, she escaped the image of Nurse Ratchet and became human.
She showed humanity.
Now, fine.
What amazes me about this, have you noticed lately that whenever a Democrat shows humanity, it's a big deal for a candidate that's supposedly to be for the people.
Remember, Gore had the same thing.
He was is he a man or a tree?
And they couldn't have had had what's her face?
Uh uh, what's her face?
Naomi, uh Naomi Wolf out there dressing him up in earth tones, try to soften his image.
And these are supposedly the people who are for the people.
And yet, whenever they behave in a way that causes people to stop in utter shock and say, why look?
Why, there's a human moment.
What doesn't that tell us about something?
Uh I I just I I find all this stuff fascinating.
We're cataloging it, we're filing it away, it's a long way to go to November.
Jonathan Alter.
He of Newsweek said the gender gap that has characterized general elections in this country for a generation has now opened up within the Democrat Party, too.
If men and women had voted in the Democrat primary in equal numbers in New Hampshire, Obama would have won.
But 57% were women in that sense.
The continued failure of the Democrats to attract male voters helped determine the outcome of this contest.
He's on to something there, by the way.
Everybody talks about the female vote, and you gotta have this, and they got you take a look at in most cases this is true.
Uh presidential winners attract the majority of the male vote.
This is not to discount the importance of the female vote.
Lord knows I would never do that.
Let's go to the audio sound bites and let's listen to the drive-by media, try to explain their versions of what I said yesterday.
MSNBC morning show today, talking with uh Mike Barnacle, columnist out of Boston Scarborough said, hey, you know, the longer I get away from it, the more I'm gonna be asking, what the hell happened here?
Because there were no signs of this.
The crying, the emotion she showed, had an enormous impact in a state where working women aren't working at hedge funds.
They're not waking up this morning going to Manhattan law firms.
They're not going out to Santa Monica talent agencies and making a couple hundred thousand dollars a year.
They are listening to stooges like me saying, give me a large light with two sweetened lows, please, and a low-fat blueberry muffin.
They are working women.
They didn't like the idea clearly of this woman giving the appearance of being beaten up Saturday night and being forced through whatever.
The exhaustion of a campaign, the weight of her marriage, many of them go home to guys who say, Hey, it's dinner ready.
So basically they said, Hey, leave her alone.
And they voted for her.
And while you're at it, fix your own dinner, mister.
The pent-up rage, this is what everybody is saying now.
That the pent-up rage that women have for the men in their lives was expressed in their votes for Hillary Clinton.
And you know who was doing most of the mocking of Hillary?
It was the drive-bys.
It really was the cable networks that were doing most of the mocking and making fun of her.
And then making fun after she cried, making all kinds of fun about that.
Uh next question from Scarborough to Barnacle.
You were talking about that husband saying his dinner ready.
Well, I'll tell you, I felt the worst for her because her husband is going around behind her back saying horrible things about her.
If you turn on the radio and you listen to the vast majority of talk radio in this country, most of it tilts right, that's fine.
But the viciousness, the level of hostility and hatred toward this one woman, the demonizing of her, the weight of that causes something to collapse in the infrastructure, the political infrastructure after a while.
None of these guys saying any of this yesterday, folks.
None of it.
Now I don't know what it means.
He well, he it probably doesn't mean much.
He's just all these people are are are trying to capitalize on the unique theorems and analysis that I offered yesterday.
And so they put their liberal spin on it.
Uh and you cut you get basically a bunch of uh uh gibberish.
Here last night the hard ball with Chris Matthews, D.D. Myers said this about the New Hampshire primary.
What happened was people watched that, and one of the realities of technology is that you can go on YouTube, the thing it's repeated.
People saw it for themselves and they judge for themselves.
And what they judged was that that was a genuine moment of she's tired, she's under a lot of pressure, people are beating her up.
Women don't like watching people be mean to other people, and they said to themselves, I'm gonna take a stand on this.
I'm gonna take a stand and say, this does not end, not like this, not now.
And they voted for her.
Women don't like to watch people be mean to each other.
See, this essentially is what I was saying yesterday, but it you've got it, Dee Dee, it's liberal women we're talking about here.
But this notion that women don't want to watch people be mean to each other, if that were the case, desperate housewives would have never gotten off the ground floor.
What is it but a show of backstabbing viciousness, even murder?
Soap operas.
The same thing.
Women love to watch people be mean to each other.
They just don't like men being the ones that are mean, but two, you know, women watching two women go at they don't mind that whatsoever.
Well, well, Chris Matthews, I mean, i in in terms of what uh uh these people think was mean was here was a serious question from a woman, how to do it.
And Mrs. Clinton got that choked voice, and a couple uh tears supposedly ran down the cheeks, and all these cable guys started laughing at it and making fun of it.
And here was a woman in pain.
Here was a woman suffering.
Here was a woman who's been put upon by everybody.
She is compared to a witch.
She is compared to a nurse in a psycho movie by Rush Limbaugh.
It's just gotten to be too much.
And finally she was asked, how do you do it?
And she sh I'm gonna tell you something.
I have to you know, when I watch this, I'm gonna tell you folks something.
I thought it was the most genuine I've ever seen her.
Now I heard the audio before I saw this.
I watched the video.
I thought I I I thought she and and uh she she was just real.
It was the first time I saw this one, even though I know she faking it, she'd rehearsed it, but she looked real.
And then the acceptance speech, after she had won the primary, I thought she looked better than I had ever seen her.
When she came out late at night, gave the acceptance speech.
I thought she got the hair down.
You know, every day during the Clinton years is a different hat, different hairband, different hairstyle.
She got the hair thing down.
She looked glowing.
She looked genuinely happy, Mr. Snurk.
She did.
At that acceptance speech, she looked genuinely.
She even looked sexy.
I thought she looked sexy.
At that acceptance speech.
Let's go to the phones.
This is uh Millicent in Cleveland.
Millicent, welcome to the EIB network.
Hello.
Hi, Rush.
How are you?
I'm fine, thank you.
Oh, what a delight to be able to talk to you.
Appreciate that.
Now, I think um I was half listening earlier during your first segment, uh, during the first part of your segment, and you you talked about briefly, you hit upon liberal women's identity.
And I think the difference between a liberal woman and a conservative woman is that conservative women, we know what our identity is.
Whether it's I'm a stay-at-home mom, or I work, but I have children, or you like it.
You like yourself.
You're not angry at the world over who you are, what you're not, who's made you what you have to be, and the liberum a lot of liberal women feel like victims, that they're they're subjugated, subordinated, have no prayer, no choice.
What do you think undeniable truth of life number 24 was all about?
It's dead on accurate today as it was when I wrote it in 1987.
Absolutely.
Feminism was established so as to allow unattractive women easier access to the mainstream.
All of this stuff proves this, folks.
You're absolutely right.
You're spot on.
Well, I appreciate the validation, Millicent.
You're welcome.
I have to say there's nothing sexier than a smart man.
I know the the brain uh is the to refined, educated, sensible woman, the male brain is the largest sex organ.
There you go.
Is that not true?
It is, absolutely.
Tell me people uh don't know women.
Um, here's the thing.
Here's the thing about this, because I know what some of you were thinking.
Does this episode with Mrs. Clinton not just blow to smithereens, the whole concept of equality, the equal rights amendment, feminism and so forth?
Uh I mean, here men routinely, I mean, life for men is one giant competition, sometimes physical, all the times mental, all the times emotional, all the times attitudinal.
Life is one big competition, and men are raised.
And the moment they show weakness in the face of competition, they're finished.
Mrs. Clinton wants to enter what has been a boys' club, fine and dandy.
What was feminism about, making sure that women could do whatever they wanted to do.
The big mistake that I think the feminists made from the get-go was rather than stick to famous female issues, having women be who they are based on who they want to be, the early feminists said you got to be like men.
You gotta dress like them, you gotta go to career schools like them, you gotta go to career path like them, you gotta climb the career ladder like them, you gotta be like men.
Well, women aren't like men, despite what Time magazine says.
There are basic differences among them the womb, and that is something that you cannot rule out here the differences once that comes into play.
At any rate, do we now have evidence?
There is no such thing as equality, particularly on a campaign trail.
I mean, look at what's been said about Huckabee.
Look at what's been said about Mitt.
Look at what's been said about Fred Thompson, you lazy bum.
Where's the fire in the belly?
People have been all over uh Huckabee because he's dishonest.
He's a liberal in sheep, a conservative or liberal in sheep's clothing.
Look at McCain, making these guys have not once broken down and cried.
They have not once gotten emotional.
They have once, not once gotten a question.
How do you do it?
No man would think of asking McCain or Rudy or Huckabee or any of these candidates, how do you put up with this?
How do you do it?
Because it's it's what it is.
And I doubt that a woman would ask these Republican candidates, how do you put up with it?
How are you handling this?
The point is, there is no such thing as equality.
There is still, and it will always be this way.
As it should be, there will always be preferential treatment for women in areas of high competition, high intensity.
There always will be.
And it should be that way.
And you can see in this whole episode the absolute fraud and intellectual vapidity that feminism, militant feminism has always been.
Hi, welcome back Rush Limbaugh.
Talent on lawn from God.
Well, this is a day for C I told you so'.
Have you heard about the cheapest car in the world that's been produced and released by the Indians?
Uh I don't know how you pronounce it, T A T A is how it's spelled.
It's Tata.
Have you have you heard it?
Have you heard it pronounced?
And I would look at it, say it's Tata, but it's probably Tata Motors.
They've unveiled the world's cheapest motor car at India's biggest car show in the capital, Delhi.
Twenty, five hundred bucks, four doors, uh, five-seater.
It I you you couldn't get one person as size of me in this.
Five seaters.
But anyway, it has no air conditioning, it has no electric windows, no power steering.
There will be two deluxe models on offer.
They're gonna make about 250,000 of these things.
They're called the nano.
Uh, and they expect the eventual demand to be one million cars per year.
Now, if you've traveled to Europe, if you've seen these bubble cars running around over that, that's sort of what this thing looks like.
Okay, fine, all well and good, right?
Why, this is super.
No.
The environmentalist wackos are livid.
Environmental critics have said the car will lead to mounting air and pollution problems on India's already clogged roads.
Tata said the car had passed emission standards.
This is not the point.
The point is here is a car that might help the third world move into the 21st century by getting the horse and buggy or the donkey or the mule out of their lives, expanding their ability to go places and transport things.
No air conditioning, 2500 bucks, probably a thousand gazillion miles to the gallon.
And who is it that is denying the poor people of the world this tiny little technological advancement?
The same environmentalist wackos who are spreading this global warming hoax on everybody else.
It is they who deny the poor people of the world a chance to prosper and improve their lot in life.
Be it in India, you take this thing to sub-Saharan Africa, you watch what happens.
They will blow a gasket.
So this idea that liberals and the socialists of the world are all for the little guy.
And they want to improve the lot in life of the little guy.
It's not what they want to do.
They want to destroy prosperity for everybody.
You never hear liberals talk about elevating people at the lower rungs of society.
You only hear them talk about punishing people at the upper rungs.
And here's a great example.
A little, I mean, his car is a joke, but for certain people in the world, it would be one of the most amazing steps up in their lives ever.
The improvement in their lives, the quality of their lives, their ability to get places, transport things.
Um but it runs on fossil fuels.
That's right, Mr. Limbaugh, runs on fossil fuel, though we're trying to get rid of fossil fuels.
And this is thirdly insensitive of you not to understand.
What's the truth is that all these bleeding heart leftists, disguised here as people and the environmental movement who have all this understanding and compassion for the suffering of the poor and the destitute, the hungry, the thirsty, the sick, don't want them to improve their lives at all.
They won't allow farming techniques of the 21st century.
They will not allow any kind of technological advancement in these third world countries.
They want them to continue to live in maggot-infested, insect-infested little swamps, pools of water with malaria all over the place because they think that will save the planet.
When it's killing the very people in Africa they claim they are the ones who have all the understanding for this little car from India.
And you have some liberals in this country buying it because it's a status symbol, like wearing a ribbon.
I care.
But they are denying this to the people of the world who need it or want to.
Mark my words.
John Kerry, the haughty, John Kerry has endorsed Obama.
In South Carolina for Why do you endorse him in New Hampshire?
At least it's a neighboring state that carries from.
▲
Export Selection