All Episodes
Previous Next
Dec. 13, 2007 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:20
December 13, 2007, Thursday, Hour #3
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
The school marm is back.
The editor of the Des Moines Register.
Jeez.
There's a reason people on TV get paid a lot of money, folks.
It's because of the way they look.
Greetings and welcome back.
You are on the Excellence in Broadcasting Network.
I am El Rushbo, the all-knowing, all-caring, all-sensing, all-feeling, all-concerned, Maharushi.
It's a thrill.
It is a delight to be with you here at the Excellence in Broadcasting Network.
Telephone number is 800-282-2882, and a new email address is Elrushbo at EIBNet.com.
All right, before we get to audio soundbites from the Republican debate yesterday, as we got George Mitchell here on the top monitor doing his little McCarthy-esque report here on baseball players and steroids and a Democrat debate on the lower monitor.
What's funny is the Democrats are on Fox.
Now, I didn't think a Democrat should do a Fox debate.
I guess the reason it's actually a PBS debate, and there's only one monitor or moderator, I think.
This woman hogs so much camera time.
I don't know if there's any other moderators or not.
But I guess since there's no Fox news people there, the Democrats couldn't object.
Here is yet another illustration of the chickification of culture.
This is not even in the United States.
This is in Sweden.
Protests from female soldiers in Sweden.
Wait a second.
Isn't Sweden neutral?
Protests from female soldiers have led to the Swedish military removing the penis of a heraldic lion depicted on the Nordic battle group's coat of arms.
The armed forces agreed to emasculate the lion after a group of women from the Rapid Reaction Force lodged a complaint to the European Court of Justice.
Although the army was eventually happy to make the changes in the interests of gender equality.
Oh, is that how you get the gender equality?
You emasculate a lion?
I knew it.
This is what feminism is.
Why don't you just put boobs on the female lions?
What are you supposed to take away the penis for?
By the way, speaking of boobs, are actresses who go out and get breast implants cheating?
It's the entertainment business.
Well, I'm just asking.
Not the way they were born if they get these implants.
Is that cheating?
It's the entertainment business.
Performance of performance enhancement breasts.
Something to consider the next time you see some.
A heraldic lion is a powerful and stately figure with its genitalia intact.
And I cannot approve an edited image that Vladimir Suggerlund from the National Archives in Sweden, he blasted the army for making changes to the coat of arms without his permission.
This is from the www.thelocal.se.
I got a picture of it here.
Well, before they emasculate, before they emasculate, I have a picture here.
Chickification of not just the news, chickification of culture.
Have you ever, oh, speaking of women, did you see this?
Sweden's welfare board, another story out of Sweden.
Sweden's welfare board has criticized a hospital in Stockholm after a 40-year-old woman caught fire during a hemorrhoid operation.
While a woman's piles here, I don't like that.
The woman's hemorrhoids were successfully removed by doctors.
She ended up leaving the surgery in September with a partially burned backside.
In addition to the hemorrhoids, she was also in a hospital to have a lump removed.
The accident took place after a nurse had cleaned the woman's skin with an antiseptic solution.
Some of the flammable liquid trickled under her body.
The patient caught fire when staff switched on the electrical current and began operating.
Have you ever wondered why pregnant women don't fall over?
I haven't either.
It never occurred to me.
And yet we have a story here from Newscientist.com to explain it to us.
Women do not tip over during pregnancy because their spines are built differently from men's, and they have been ever since our ancestors began walking upright.
The difference allows a pregnant woman to lean backward to counterbalance the weight of her developing fetus.
They found that the women corrected for their growing imbalance by bending backward in a lower part of their spine.
Detailed anatomical measurements showed that the vertebrae of the lower back are more wedge-shaped in women than in men, which makes this bending easier.
Well, how about what the feminazis are going to say about this?
Men and women are supposed to be the same.
They're born different.
Yes, this will probably be a Time magazine cover story.
New research.
Women and men, different spines.
Parentheses, thank God.
Comes in handy.
Let's see.
The three main minorities in the U.S., what do you think the three main minorities in the U.S. are, Mr. Snerdley?
By the way, folk, you've got to.
Dawn went out.
She's so sweet.
She went out and got Mr. Snerdley a black Santa.
And I'm walking back to Mr. Snerdley's office, and I'm looking.
I said, what?
What is that?
She says, oh, Dawn got me a black Santa.
And stared at her.
Something about this just, it looks Jewish, Snerdley.
I said, it looks like it's a Jewish.
Or maybe, yeah, the Sammy Davis thing.
Except this has got a long-flowing beard.
It's beautifully done.
Don't misunderstand it.
It's about two feet tall and so forth, really decked out.
I told Snerdley, you know, it looks Jewish or Arab, and neither of those kind of work with Santa Claus.
But make the most of it.
What are the three main minorities in the United States?
Black, Hispanics, Asian.
You know your minorities.
Blacks, Hispanic, and Asians, they have little trust for each other, and they hold prejudiced views about Americans of different ethnic origins to their own, according to a poll.
This extraordinary poll reveals some unflattering reality as it exists in America today, said Sandy Close, head of the New American Media, NAM, which sponsored the poll together with ethnic media groups.
44% of Hispanics, 47% of Asians are afraid of African Americans because they are responsible for most of the crime.
More than half of black Americans polled, and 46% of Hispanics and Asian business owners do not treat them with respect.
Half of African Americans said Latin American immigrants are taking jobs in housing and political power away from the black community.
Hispanics and Asians, whose populations are made up mainly of immigrants, were positive about the American dream, saying that those who work hard in the U.S. reap the rewards of their toil.
In contrast, more than 60% of African Americans dismiss the American dream as not working for them.
Yet, yet, they continue to vote for the very people that are keeping the American dream away from them, the Democrat Party.
All three ethnic groups viewed white Americans in a more favorable light than they did members of another minority.
Yes, that's what the survey said.
All three minorities viewed white Americans in a more favorable light than they did members of another minority.
Now, this makes total sense to me.
You've got, for the longest time, the number one minority in the country was African American, and they got all the minority spoils.
Well, now we've got this invasion.
We've got immigrants, legal and illegal, Hispanics and Asians, and the Democrats are treating them like minorities, too, and so there's a competition now to be the number one minority because the number one minority gets the spoils and gets all the attention.
You can chalk this up to liberalism, and you can chalk all this up to the Democrat Party, and look at who it is that's making prejudiced judgments on it.
I didn't think minorities had the—the Reverend Dax said many times that minorities can't be racist because they don't have the power to act upon or enforce their racism.
All right, brief timeout.
Audio soundbites of the debate and your phone calls right around the corner.
I just discovered I can see myself in a mirror over there.
Cool.
And we're back.
All right, Alan Keyes somehow made it onto the stage for the Republican debate yesterday.
And we have a montage here.
Now, remember to drive-bys just got through saying it's the most boring debate that they had ever seen in their lives.
We need to stop listening to these phonies.
These folks represent the very elites who year after year after year have destroyed our Constitution, betrayed our rights, and undermined our strength created by our people in the world.
I'm in favor of reducing global warming because I think the most important emission we need to control is the hot air emission of politicians.
Do I have to raise my hand to get a question?
I would like to address that question.
I'm getting to you.
No, you're not.
They had a minute.
Why do I get 30 seconds?
If you really want to see a change in government, then we need to restore the credibility of the Republican Party.
Join the political army of America's revival at alankeys.com and make sure you become part of that change.
Okay, the Keysters are back in the debate.
Alan Keyes admitted Dennis Kucinich kicked off the Democrat debate today.
Here's an interesting answer from Romney.
The Des Moines Register editor, Carolyn Washedout Washburn, says, are there programs and situations that are so important that you'd be willing to run a deficit to pay for them?
Well, we don't have to run a deficit to pay for the things that are most important because we can eliminate the things that aren't critical.
We have in the federal government 342 different economic development programs, often administered by different departments.
We don't need 342.
Rado.
We have 40 different programs for workforce training.
There are probably five or six that are really working and a lot that are not working terribly well.
We can get rid of some of those.
We have 13 different programs to prevent teenage pregnancy.
Rado.
Well, they're obviously not working real well.
And we can probably cut it down to one or two that are making a difference.
I love this answer.
We don't have to run a deficit to pay for the things that are most important.
We can eliminate the things that aren't critical.
All the redundancy that we have in these social programs.
The next question.
Carolyn Washburn says to Romney, who in this country is paying more than a fair share of taxes relative to everybody else?
The wealthy, the middle class, the poor, or corporations.
I don't stay awake at night worrying about the taxes that rich people are paying, to tell you the truth.
I'm concerned about the taxes that middle-class families are paying.
They're under a lot of pressure.
Gasoline's expensive.
Home heating oil, particularly in the Northeast, is very difficult for folks.
Health care costs are going through the roof.
Education costs and higher education are overwhelming.
And as a result, we need to reduce the burden on middle-income families in this country.
That wasn't Romney.
Who was that?
That didn't sound.
Play number 15 again.
I want to hear Romney's.
Just play a little bit of 15.
I can't.
It's my hearing, folks.
Some voices sound the same.
What in Romney?
Play 15.
Just give me a little bit of a moment.
Well, we don't have to run a deficit to pay for the things that are most important because we can limit.
Maybe it is Romney.
All right, play 16 again.
I don't stay awake at night worrying about the taxes that rich people are paying, to tell you the truth.
I guess that's what I'm saying.
I'm concerned about the taxes that middle classes are.
All right.
All right.
That's fine.
That's a stupid answer.
We don't need to hear it again.
Don't stay awake at night worrying about the taxes that rich people are paying, to tell you the truth.
You better be because the Democrats are going to soak everybody.
Mitt, come on, you've got to be concerned about the taxes that everybody.
I know you're trying to appeal to a much larger group of people, the middle class and so forth, but that could have done better.
On to Fred Thompson, who decided that he would make a couple of jokes at Romney's expense.
My goal is to get into Mitt Romney's situation where I don't have to worry about taxes anymore.
But 5% again in your situation.
5%.
Well, you know, you're getting to be a pretty good actor, actually.
Ooh, tuppa-tuppa-tuppa there from Fred Thompson.
Squeezing it in there a couple of times.
And now this is the question that the audience loved, or the incident.
The moderator said, I want to take on a new issue.
I'd like to see a show of hands.
How many of you believe global climate change is a serious threat and caused by human activity?
Do you want to give me a minute to answer that?
No, I don't.
Well, then I'm not going to answer.
Okay.
You want a show of hands?
He's not going to play the game.
He's not going to do this kind of thing.
And the people loved this.
And then they said, she said, well, how about 30 seconds?
He said, no, I'm not doing it.
Will you ask me a question?
I'm going to answer it.
I'm not going to give a show of hands.
Now, here's Huckabee.
This is the question is, what do you believe you can accomplish in your first year as president?
The first priority of the next president is to be a president of all the United States.
We are right now a very polarized country, and that polarized country has led to a paralyzed government.
We've got Democrats who fight Republicans, liberals fighting conservatives.
The left fights the right.
Who's fighting for this country again?
And somehow, we've got to quit even fighting among ourselves as conservatives and as Republicans and start putting the better interest of this nation.
Look, I know you hucksters are out there.
This bothers me.
This sounds like broken.
I don't care what the solution is.
Liberal or conservative, I don't care.
I do.
Liberal solutions are destroying the fabric of this country.
And as such, conservatives fighting liberals is what this election is about.
The left being defeated is what this election is about.
That is fighting for the country.
Bad answer.
Fred Thompson up next.
Carolyn Washburn says, Senator Thompson, you've expressed doubts at the recent report on Iran's nuclear capabilities accurate.
As president, how would you decide when to disagree with available intelligence?
And then what would you do?
Well, that's probably the most important question that's been asked today.
We have a real problem with our intelligence community.
It, along with certain parts of our military, were neglected for a long, long time in this country, and we're paying the price for it.
Now, the fact is that nobody has any real confidence in the result that they're getting.
And the result you're talking about was directly contradicted by their strong beliefs just two years ago.
So you've got to rebuild from the bottom up.
I think that in the meantime, we have to rely on other people.
The British are helpful to us.
The Israelis sometimes are helpful to us.
Next question.
Give me two examples, Governor Huckabee.
You've not previously given, one in health care, one in education, where your faith would define change you want to see in policy.
The two overriding principles are: you treat others as you wish to be treated.
As it relates in health care, that means that we recognize that a person who is sick shouldn't be treated differently because they're in poverty than a person who has extraordinary wealth, that we have some sense of balance in how we approach that.
That's the essence of what America is about.
The second basic principle is that inasmuch as you've done it to the least of these, my brethren, you've done it unto me.
What it really means is that you go back to what the founding fathers said.
All of us are created equal, endowed by our Creator with those rights, life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
Okay.
You can get that answer from John Edwards.
Poverty, a person who has extraordinary...
See, this gets the notion that health care is a constitutional right.
And we're all entitled to the same health care.
Are we all entitled to the same hotel rooms?
Are we all entitled to the same cars?
Are we all entitled to the same homes?
Are we all entitled to the same shampoo?
Are we all entitled to the same band-aids?
Are we all entitled to the same food?
Are we all entitled to a house on the beach?
We're Americans.
We're created equal.
God created us life, liberty, pursuit of happiness.
Are we all entitled to the same happiness?
Where does notion of health care get in this mix is somehow a constitutional right?
Not the case.
What are you saying, Rush?
Are you saying the poor shouldn't get as good a health care?
No.
I'm not saying that.
I'm saying that you can't.
What happens is that you end up when the government is going to run this.
Nobody's going to get good health care, and whoever's getting the best is going to see it worsen.
It's just that.
But I'm speaking in a concept of principles in the first place.
And that here you have a conservative running for the presidency adopting the class envy of a John Edwards.
We'll be back here in just a second.
Stay with us.
All right, back to the phones we go now.
And we'll start in Chico, California.
This is Justin.
I'm glad you called, sir.
It's great to have you with us.
Hey, Rush, how are you doing?
Just fine.
Good.
Hey, I just wanted to tell you, like you often are, you're being very modest about this issue with Fred Thompson and the comment he made in the debate.
Yesterday, when I was listening to it, I was reminded, I think it was exactly two weeks ago, you were talking about the YouTube debate, and you said that because such a venue demeans the presidency, you would make a comment that it does so and walk off the stage and thus win the election.
And I think Fred Thompson was listening to you that day, and I think he took that to heart, and yesterday decided to make a similar statement.
And therefore, you know.
Well, it's awfully nice of you to, when you see a presidential candidate do something that you like, attribute it to me.
Well, I am.
I heard him say it.
I can understand that.
But I actually, in this case, I don't know.
There's no way of knowing.
Fred Thompson, he's his own man.
I'm sure that this show of hands stuff, I'll bet it was just spontaneous on his part.
But he did the right thing, this show of hands business.
I'm watching the Democrat debate here.
The questions are so different.
And this is predictable.
What should we do about NAFTA?
What do you think?
It's a Democrat debate.
I understand all that.
But all these questions are specific to each party or ideology.
And the mainstream media is the wrong people to run these debates.
I'm just telling you it is.
I'm not saying the League of Women Voters is any better.
The mainstream media is just the wrong bunch to run these things because they bring their agendas and they bring their prejudices of both parties when they get to these debates.
And they're not really serving anything.
Get this.
Modified stem cells from muscular dystrophy patients.
That would make them adults.
Certainly not embryos.
Modified stem cells from muscular dystrophy patients eased symptoms of the disease in mice, says a study that raises hopes for treating patients with tissues from their own bodies.
The idea of treating people with their own cells is attractive because their bodies would not be expected to reject the cells as foreign.
So they wouldn't have to take drugs to prevent rejection.
Now, this article is this is not possible, folks.
This makes Bush and all of the conservatives right.
This article can't be right because everybody knows the only way to cure disease is to kill babies.
This is a second example where adult stem cells are being successfully tested on animals to achieve the same results that they told us only embryonic stem cells could possibly succeed in accomplishing.
This is not good, folks.
This next news item is not good.
California won a major legal battle Wednesday in its fight to implement a global warming law that would lead to steep increases in motor vehicle fuel economy.
A federal judge in Fresno tossed out a lawsuit by the world's major automakers that tried to overturn AB 1493, Assembly Bill 1493, a law that requires a 30% reduction of greenhouse gas emissions by 2016.
They can't do it.
Not unless they pretended they got an ice storm and it shuts down all the electrical grid.
This can't be done.
This is going to destroy the California economy.
The automaker said the law was unconstitutional because it mandated a big jump in mileage standards, a matter that's under the authority of the Department of Transportation's National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
They further argued that the California standards would raise vehicle prices by as much as six grand per vehicle, leading to fewer sales and tens of thousands of auto plant layoffs.
But U.S. District Judge Anthony Ishi rejected those claims, ruling that the goal of reducing greenhouse gas emissions and arresting climate change must go forward.
So another judge and his personal policy preferences supplant and suffice as law.
Gideon in Greenwich, Connecticut, glad you waited, sir.
Welcome to the EIB network.
Hey, Rush.
Yeah.
Hillary's equivalent of Karl Robe is, what, Harold Ickes?
Somebody like that?
Well, in wait a second.
Run that by me again.
I'm just wondering who.
I guess I'm trying to imagine Hillary's.
There is no equivalent to Harold Ickies.
Karl Robe's not a scheming slime boy.
Well, I'm sorry.
Yeah, no, you're right.
I understand.
I'm just talking about in terms of her political, her top political advisor.
Yeah, it'd be Harold Ike.
In fact, Harold Ickes was, you know, the Clinton campaign decided that they had to go out to Iowa.
He couldn't manage this campaign from 1,000 miles away in Washington.
Harold Ickes said, don't do that.
You have a bunch of people flying into Iowa.
It's going to look like Panic City.
So they went to Chicago.
But yeah, Harold Ickies is big.
Howard Wolfson is big.
Wolfson, right?
There's no.
All right, well, I was just imagining those two guys, they are not unsophisticated.
They know what they're doing.
And I have to believe that if they feel the need to put out some dirt on Obama, that they will do so in a clever way.
They'll try to float it out through a Republican, perhaps Republican stooge, as they might say, so that then Hillary can condemn the information when it comes out and say, well, this is.
It's a little late for this.
The Hillary campaign's already got both feet hip deep in it here.
Well, but they care so.
You see, you know how the USA, they always accuse us of being like them, of what they really are.
And they desire power so greatly.
And I just can't believe she's going to let this slip through her fingers because of Barack Obama and Oprah.
Well, you know, one of the problems, one of the mistakes that you are making in formulating your hypothesis and your thesis is that they are indomitable, that they are flawless, that they never screw up, that everything that they do, whatever it looks good, looks bad, is planned, that nothing ever goes wrong for them.
And this is not the case.
Lots goes wrong for the Clintons.
You just don't hear about a lot of it.
Like I said the other day, Clinton doesn't help anybody when he goes out to campaign for him.
So she's already, this guy, Shaheen, has already stepped in it.
Obama might be selling drugs.
And they're out there since last summer.
They got people going around to Obama support us.
He's running a slush fund.
We don't, you know, Republicans get hold of these things that we're going to be.
They're the ones putting them out, and it's hit the light of day now.
You ought to look at the newspapers today are filled with how the Democrats are screwing everything up from Democrats in Congress and their Iraq war resolutions.
Their inability to pass any meaningful resolution.
They're the majority, but they can't get any legislation passed.
They lost.
They're going to cave on budget items.
They caved on the AMT.
USA Today says that the Democrats are a party lost when it comes to Iraq because the surge is working.
They are a party adrift and they are lost.
They don't know where they are.
You've got the Democrats in the House blaming the Democrats in the Senate for nothing getting done and vice versa.
When you get to the presidential level, it's too late for Mrs. Clinton to blame the Republicans on this or for this.
Now, I don't discount your theory that they will maybe try, find some Republican stooge to say something.
And I doubt that we've heard the last of the dirty tricks from the Clinton campaign because they are desperate.
Make no mistake about this.
They are desperate.
This is not part of some orchestrated plan that's designed to make them look like she's really overcoming a battle.
I think that was part of the original strategy.
But this is almost spiraling out of their control now.
And it's not working.
It's not bringing Obama down.
Obama's numbers are not plummeting during all of this.
I got to take quick time out.
We'll do that.
Be back and continue right after this.
Don't go anywhere.
Time continues to flash on by, ladies and gentlemen.
So listen fast.
Lot to say.
I'm going to squeeze it all in here as time is tight.
Doug in Atlanta.
I'm glad you called, sir.
Nice to have you here.
Hey, Mega Ditto's Rush.
Thank you.
Great honor.
Great honor.
Hey, I wanted to just briefly mention our L.A. Times article from December 10th for two points.
One for fundraising scandal possibilities with Hillary Clinton.
And then the second point was just the fact that I have not seen this mentioned in any of the media outlets anywhere.
So it's kind of a story that seems to be buried.
But it was a story about actually titled Clinton Rolls a Sizable Pork Barrel.
And it talks about her being, and I quote, Hillary Clinton does earmarking on a different scale from most senators, and she's made an aggressive pay-to-play earmark game.
And then they also tie a lot of those recipients of those earmarks back to them giving her funds for her campaign.
And you don't hear about this anywhere in the media.
I don't know if you saw the story or not.
Yeah, I saw it.
I had it in the stack a couple days ago.
I didn't have a chance to get to it.
They never, ever talk about the Clinton fundraising scandals in the context of them being scandals.
They just, oh, got some Chinese dishwashers in Chinatown and they make like eight grand a year and they've donated $1,000 to Hillary.
Oh, they must care about America.
Isn't it great they're involved in the political process?
Norman Shu.
No, that's, you know what?
People expect it.
That's why they put crime scene taper on Clinton headquarters.
People just know this.
Yeah, I mean, it's unbelievable.
I mean, they're saying over a million dollars in contributions from the people that were recipients of earmarks.
That's what they know.
That's how much they know.
I appreciate it, Rush.
All right.
I'm glad you called.
I'm not trying to look at your, I'm not saying it's not important.
We talk about it here.
I'm just saying, as far as the drive-bys are concerned, that's one of those areas that remains that they still marvel at how the Clintons do it and get away with it.
It's because they look the other way.
It's just expected.
It's no different the sun coming up every morning.
The Clintons are going to have fundraising irregularities.
Who is this?
Wade?
Is that what it's Wade in Corpus Christi?
Hello, sir.
Hey, Rush, Megaditto.
Thank you.
I finally get to talk to you.
It's only been about 20 years that I've been trying.
I wanted to say that I'm glad they're releasing the names in baseball.
I'm not a big baseball fan, admittedly.
I'm a cycling fan.
And in cycling, for years, they've been going through these guys and releasing their names.
They're getting fired for nothing.
Have you ever heard of Operation Puerto Operation Proto?
No, I haven't.
That is a huge investigation they did through multiple sports.
They came up with about 200 names of people that were doing, or athletes that were doing drugs and illegal things like that.
And all they did was release the names of the cyclists, and that's it.
And so this is where Floyd Landis comes from and all these guys.
So you think they're destroying cycling with this?
Absolutely they are, yeah.
But if they're going to do it in cycling, they need to do it in the other sports.
They have lots of names for people in the other sports.
They won't release the names, and they won't even tell you what sports they have.
Well, look, I don't subscribe to that logic.
They're going to ruin cycling that's ruined.
And I don't want to subscribe to the logic.
Well, they all do it.
That's a Clinton defense.
Yes, drugs and every sport.
What the hell do we care about?
Here's the thing.
One of the things that I, when I have this list of names for the show starts, there's like 80 names on this.
And there's some big names on there, but some names that you would never know.
There's some names of people that are not big-time performers.
They're not knocking the ball out of the park.
They're not big, heavy, home run pitchers and so forth.
You've got some average run-of-the-mill people there that are taking this stuff.
And so we think, we in the lay community, we think it automatic.
If you take this stuff, it's going to enhance your performance, going to make you able to do this or that.
But even after all of this with these names, and there's probably more than this that we don't know, that somebody did rat out, they don't all perform equally even after taking the stuff.
Now, there may be different amounts, different kinds.
Sure, there are, but we all believe that if everybody's taking the stuff, then everybody's going to be that much better than they otherwise would be.
And in some cases, you've got some 250 hitters here taking this stuff.
You've got some pitchers with 5.0 ERAs.
You get people you never heard of.
And the reason you haven't heard of them is because they're not stars.
Maybe backups, scrubs, or whatever.
So you can't automatically conclude that everybody taking these things is going to have their talent increased, their hand-eye coordination made better, because it doesn't do that.
It makes them stronger, makes them recover from injury faster, but obviously it does not raise performance equally among the people who take it.
Now, I'll just be curious to see if anybody points this out and tries to analyze that.
There's going to be an analysis of this to the point you're going to get bored with it.
What happens to endorsement?
Snurdley wants to know what happens to endorsement deals that these guys.
Well, that's, see, they're going to have to come out and deny it.
This is not a court.
Mitchell's not a judge.
There's no legal authority behind any of this.
But that is an interesting thing.
Businesses might not want to be associated.
National clients.
This guy may get some local endorses.
It depends on how they handle it.
I'm sorry.
Be competitive and prolong my girls.
If that happens, it's going to be heroes.
This is a nation.
And the last 20 years has been built on.
I'm sorry.
Hell, we apologize for everything.
We send Clint over to apologize for our existence.
Roger in Coquille, Oregon, welcome to the program.
It's a big honor, Rush.
Big honor.
Thank you.
I just wanted to tell you that you were the one that told us that nothing the Clintons do is by accident.
So, you know, and I'm glad you did because, you know, now we, you know, we have to look at everything they do and see if they did it on purpose.
You know.
I said nothing that happens is a coincidence.
Right, Clinton says, right.
I didn't say it always works.
Well, I think she probably just has too many pots on the stove or something and too many people doing things for making comments.
No, here's the difference.
This is being done against a black Democrat.
If this were the general election and these tricks are being played against Mitt Romney, I'll give you the difference.
Let's say that this guy, Shaheen, in New Hampshire, went someplace and said, you know what?
All this new Mormon stuff with Romney, that's it.
You know, this guy, he smoked marijuana.
He's actually distributing this stuff during the Olympics.
The drive-bys would then run to Romney.
What do you mean you were distributing drugs during the Olympic?
They would accept the premise when it's a black Democrat that this stuff's being said about.
I mean, these libs, you know, race, race, drive-by meeting or civil rights race when you've got somebody saying this guy's selling drugs.
And when you're out there trying to sabotage this guy by saying he's got a slush fund when you have crime scene tape around your headquarters, you know, Hillary will get away with every bit of this and more against whoever the Republican nominee is.
But not going to get away.
And that's their miscalculation.
They're overly confident that the drive-bys will bend over, grab the ankles, and do whatever the Clintons want.
Not in this particular case.
I, the Doctor of Democracy, El Rushbo, your truth detector, must now take my leave to begin working on tomorrow's excursion into broadcast excellence life, his show prep, no matter where it's lived.
In the meantime, be cool and be nice.
▲
Export Selection