Rush Limbaugh Program - November 29, 2007, Thursday, Hour #2

All Episodes

Previous Next

Nov. 29, 2007 - Rush Limbaugh Program

36:11

November 29, 2007, Thursday, Hour #2

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Okay, folks, we are back and broadcast excellence all yours once again for another solid hour, two more solid hours to go here on the Rush Limbaugh program, a program that meets and surpasses all audience expectations on a daily basis.
	They meet and surpass all expectations, especially today.
	Telephone number 800-282-2882.
	Email address, rush at EIBnet.com.
	The surfer dude, Ted, from California, that asked the question about farm subsidies.
	You want to tell me, this guy is a former intern for Jane Harmon, Democrat congresswoman from California.
	You want to tell me that it's an accident that they get some kid to read some question somebody wrote for him about farm subsidies designed to trip up one of these candidates going into Iowa where corn and ethanol, all that, you think any of this is an accident at CNN?
	It cannot possibly be an accident.
	And by the way, we've got confirmation.
	December 11th, 2003, retired Brigadier General Keith Kerr did appear on CNN.
	Bill Hemmer, who was now at Fox, was at CNN, said it's been 10 years since Don't Ask, Don't Tell became law for gays in the military.
	A controversial policy that has a number of critics, among them three high-ranking officers now retired and now revealing that they're gay.
	Why then did these military men come out now?
	Retired Brigadier General Keith Kerr live in San Francisco.
	Blah, blah, blah.
	Gentlemen, good morning to you.
	We want to start with General Kerr in San Francisco.
	So they had him on to talk about this almost four years ago.
	We didn't know.
	I mean, we had no idea you're working for Hillary.
	We didn't have any idea whatsoever.
	Can I also, you know, I'm a little not disturbed, but I'm a little fired up here.
	I took a couple, three phone calls in the first hour from people.
	Hey, I thought it was a great debate.
	I thought these people did a great job.
	Within the narrow confines and context, yeah, Republican candidates looked fine.
	They looked good.
	But I want to call your attention to some things.
	We haven't talked about this yet.
	There was a YouTube question, an animated question from an editorial cartoonist.
	The editorial cartoonist caricatured Dick Cheney.
	And the animated cartoon question on YouTube, Cheney was asking these Republican candidates if their vice presidential candidate would have as much power as he does.
	Now, where the hell does that come from if not a convicted liberal bias?
	And then, of course, the last words from the animated caricature of Dick Cheney were, I'll be listening, or I'll be watching.
	I'm going to tell you, if I had been on that stage, after watching that, I would have said to Anderson Cooper, Mr. Cooper, I'm running for President of the United States, and I am not going to sit here and let you and this network caricature and mischaracterize the Vice President of the United States.
	He is a great man.
	He has served his country in public service for decades, and the last seven years and the attempts to destroy him are simply unacceptable and intolerable.
	And for you to facilitate this in the form of a debate about the future of this country is something I resent, and I am not going to deal with answering your question because it's bogus.
	And I would be leading in the polls today.
	But, of course, that's not the attitude.
	It's easy for me to say I'm not a candidate, and I wasn't on the stage.
	But, you know, that somebody at the RNC, somebody in these circles had to convince these guys to do this debate.
	And I'll bet the convincing went something like this.
	We got to do it.
	Well, the Democrats did it.
	If we don't do it, well, what are they going to say about us?
	Oh, they'll say we're cowards.
	What are we going to do?
	You know, I remember when I was a top 40 DJ, and I, you know, picking music, it was very, very competitive.
	We had a lot of stations.
	You would not believe, it's a KQV, ABC ONO.
	You would not believe what we did to try to stay ahead of the competition on music.
	You know, most people driving around in cars would punch a button if they didn't like a song or if they had just heard it.
	We had people that sat around and monitored all the competitors, try to get their playlist and make sure that we played songs before they did.
	And there was one particular period of time, I forget what it was, forget the song.
	It was top 10 song nationwide, and we didn't play it.
	And I went to the program director and said, we're not playing a number one song, or we're not playing a top 10 song.
	Why not?
	Well, that song's offensive.
	He said to me, you can never be hurt by what you don't play.
	You can be hurt by playing something nobody wants to hear, but you can never be hurt by playing something, not playing something, because nobody will ever know you're not playing it.
	Nobody will ever run around and say, I'm not listening to that station because they're not playing X. Because they'll never know because people don't listen 24-7.
	So this whole defensive posture during this debate last night was, we got to do this.
	I mean, what are they going to say about it?
	You can't be hurt by what you don't do.
	Nobody in a presidential race a year from now is going to remember whether you did a CNN YouTube debate or not if you don't do it.
	If you do it and screw it up, then you can hurt yourself, either individually, candidate-wise, or as a party.
	This Confederate flag question last night.
	I don't know that we've got the audio sound, but I've got to check the roster.
	If we do, I'll play it for you.
	But it was some hayseed sitting in what looked to be a trailer park asking about the Confederate flag.
	I must confess I couldn't hear the question, but I remember Romney's answer: I'm not going to have that flag anywhere where I am.
	It was Democrats who raised that flag in South Carolina.
	To ask Republicans about this is one of the most misrepresentative and misleading things.
	Mitt Romney's not running around, nor is Rudy talking about the Confederate flag.
	They're not talking about the Civil War.
	They're not talking about slavery.
	They're not talking about anything that people associate with that flag.
	In fact, I think the guy was from Houston who had the flag on his wall in the back.
	It was Democrats who raised that flag.
	Here's another thing.
	You remember the last debate that the Democrats did with Tim Russert moderating?
	And the simple, harmless little policy question to Mrs. Clinton about illegal aliens getting driver's licenses in New York.
	Do you remember the storm that erupted that night and the next day?
	How dare Russert go personal?
	How dare Tim Russert launch a personal attack?
	Why, I'm going to make sure that Wolf Blitzer doesn't russert Hillary against the Blitzer got warned at CNN.
	And by the way, what do we get during that CNN debate?
	We got the Clinton News Network on full display, giving her a total pass, planted questions, of course.
	And now, after the debate last night, I'm not hearing anybody say, well, these questions were a little odd, these little setups, this and that and the other thing.
	People are talking about how they YouTube, people, some of them were plants and might have been Democrat activists and so forth.
	But nobody's talking about the absolute ludicrous nature of the questions.
	Yet you ask Mrs. Clinton a policy question and you better be wearing a protective cup between your legs.
	And these are the kind of things, folks, That bother me in addition to whatever you saw last night that you liked.
	I just, I just, if you're going to go someplace, if you're going to appear, and it's going to be on quasi-national TV on a cable network, A, you better be informed what you're walking into so that you can overcome it and shine.
	And I don't, you know, the overall impression, who are these things trying to reach?
	Right now, they're trying to reach the base.
	And I will guarantee you, the base of the party that watched this last night had to be as livid as I am with just the total nature and tone of the questions that were asked because it clearly illustrated what CNN and Democrats and liberals are all the same think of conservatives.
	Anyway, brief time out.
	We got some more audio soundbites of this coming up right after this brief break.
	Don't go away, folks.
	Hi, welcome back, Rush Limbaugh, talent on loan from God.
	Those of you on hold, be patient.
	I'm going to get to you in the next half hour, maybe sooner.
	I just got some audio soundbites I want to run through.
	Here is the exchange about the Confederate flag.
	Mr. Snerdley, suspend your call screening for seconds.
	I want you to hear this question.
	Snerdley, none of you guys in there saw the debate last night, right?
	Okay.
	No, this is the first time I watched it, and the staff didn't.
	I actually paid people to do something you didn't do last night.
	Nevertheless, here is the exchange.
	Hello, my name is Leroy Brooks.
	I am from Houston, Texas.
	And my question is for all the candidates.
	What does this flag right here represent?
	The symbol of racism?
	The symbol of political ideology?
	Is it a symbol of Southern heritage?
	Or is it something completely different?
	Talking about the stars and bars, Governor Romney.
	Right now, with the kinds of issues we got in this country, I'm not going to get involved in a flag like that.
	That's not a flag that I recognize or that I would hold up in my room.
	And then they kept talking about it and so forth.
	And that's a good answer.
	What has this got to do with anything he's saying?
	It had nothing to do with anything here.
	Mr. Cooper, it was Democrats that raised the flag in South Carolina.
	That's what all this is.
	Bob Jones, all this subtle innuendo here from these holier-than-now socialist liberals dominate the drive-by media and CNN.
	Now, here's, let's, let's go some of these others.
	This, these CNN tried to make these YouTube questioners appear to be average Americans without political agendas.
	This is Journey, and she is a declared John Edwards supporter.
	Hi, my name is Journey.
	I'm from Texas, and this question is for all politically pro-life candidates.
	In the event that abortion becomes illegal and a woman obtains an abortion anyway, what should she be charged with, and what should her punishment be?
	What about the doctor who performs the abortion?
	Once again, another agenda question.
	Those kinds of questions are not part of this presidential debate and haven't been.
	And you know as well as I know that the purpose of that question was to trip somebody up.
	So there'd be a headline today.
	Candidate X says put women in jail, put doctor in jail or what have you.
	You know, you people at CNN really make people sick.
	You know, you people have this holier than now, erudite arrogance about yourselves, and you're a bunch of uninformed, ignoramous morons about this country and about the people who live in it.
	You have your preconceived notions.
	You have your bias.
	You have your prejudice.
	You are liberals and you claim that none of that applies to you.
	You can't be prejudiced.
	You're good people.
	You can't be biased.
	You're a journalist.
	You cannot have preconceived notions.
	You're open-minded.
	You are the most closed-minded, unopen, uninformed, ignoramuses on the face of the media planet.
	And that's saying something given that there's also the BBC and the New York Times.
	But you people are embarrassing yourselves and you don't even know it.
	The next one, Leanne Anderson.
	A union activist whose union, the American Steelworkers Union, has endorsed John Edwards.
	My name is Leanne Anderson, and I'm from Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
	And these are my kids, Evan and Maya.
	Maya is from China, and we adopted her to give her a better life.
	We never dreamed that she'd be exposed to lead after leaving China.
	And now we find trains like this that are covered with lead in our home.
	My question for the candidates are, what are you going to do to make sure that these kind of toys don't make their way into our homes and that we have safe toys that are made in America again and we keep jobs in America?
	Yeah, this is supposedly an undecided Republican voter who simply wants to know the answer to the question.
	These are all setups.
	If I didn't know better, Democrats wrote the questions or CNN wrote the questions.
	What's the difference?
	There isn't much of a difference.
	Lead toys.
	And what are you going to do about toys made in America again that we keep jobs in America?
	Look, I know lead in the toys from the TRICOMs is a problem here, but I guess these people, every one of these Republican candidates is looked at by people at CNN as a suspect.
	They go out there and they review these so-called 5,000 YouTube submissions.
	And what is it about these submissions that appeal to them?
	Anybody that submitted a question looks and acts like they also think the candidates are suspects?
	Oh, hell yeah, that's a great question.
	These Republicans are suspects.
	Who do these Republicans think they are?
	And this next one, this is the log cabin Republican guy, David Sircone, whose website says that he supports Obama.
	Hi, my name is David Sircone.
	I would like to ask all the candidates if they accept the support of the log cabin Republicans and why should the log cabin Republicans support their candidacy?
	So that was the second homosexual or gay question.
	And again, that evolves from the fact that Republicans are suspects and they're homophobes and they're racists and they're bigots.
	That's why you get the Confederate flag question.
	What's frustrating to me about it is that people at CNN are supposed to be, anybody in journalism is supposed to be more informed and more open, and they're just the opposite.
	And you've got group gang think in there.
	And so none of this stuff even occurs to them as to how it's going to look.
	But that's what it was.
	Let's move on.
	Immigration, I mentioned, was one of the hotly contested issues at the top of the debate.
	The, the, the, hang on a second.
	Yeah, I did remember calling for the immigration issue to become part of the presidential campaign, and I have thus made it so by forcing the question to Mrs. Clinton.
	So last night, Anison Cooper starts out, Governor Romney, was New York a sanctuary city?
	And Romney says, absolutely.
	It called itself a sanctuary city.
	And as a matter of fact, when the Welfare Reform Act that President Clinton brought forward said that they were going to end the sanctuary policy in New York City, the mayor, Giuliani, actually brought a suit to maintain its sanctuary status.
	It's unfortunate, but Mitt generally criticizes people in a situation in which he's had far the worst record.
	For example, in his case, there were six sanctuary cities.
	He did nothing about them.
	There was even a sanctuary mansion.
	At his own home, illegal immigrants were being employed, not being turned in to anybody or by anyone.
	And then when he deputized the police, he did it two weeks before he was going to leave office.
	And they never seemed to even catch the illegal immigrants who were working at his mansion.
	So I would say he had sanctuary mansion, not just sanctuary city.
	Now, here's Romney's response.
	Mayor, you know better than that.
	No, I don't.
	Yeah, okay, then listen.
	All right, then listen.
	First of all, you did have illegal immigrants working at your mansion, didn't you?
	No, I did not.
	So let's just talk about that.
	Are you suggesting, Mr. Mayor?
	Because I think it's really kind of offensive, actually, to suggest, to say, look, you know what?
	If you're a homeowner and you hire a company to come provide a service at your home, paint the home, put on the roof, if you hear someone that's working out there, not that you've employed, but that the company has, if you hear someone with a funny accent, you as a homeowner are supposed to go out there and say, I want to see your papers.
	Is that what you're suggesting?
	Rudy then shot back with this.
	If you're going to take this holy-than-now attitude that your whole approach to immigration was immigration is holy the now, Mayor, if you're going to take this holy-the-now attitude that you were perfect on immigration.
	I'm not perfect.
	This so happened you have a special immigration problem that nobody else here has.
	You were employing illegal immigrants.
	You know, what is pretty serious thing that were under your nose?
	So you see, now I'm watching this, and I'm saying, okay, now this, this is the kind of thing I think it is the sanctuary mansion business is a good line.
	Do you know what most of our conservative commentators are saying today?
	That that was a low blow, that that was beneath Rudy's dignity to make that comment.
	Shouldn't have happened.
	It's fascinating even to watch the conventional wisdom on our side of things.
	I think they might be a little scared, some media people on our side.
	But nevertheless, these were the fireworks in the debate last night.
	And of course, McCain, McCain was next up talking about this.
	We don't have time to get the bite in before the break ends.
	I'll shave it for after the break, and then we'll go to your phone calls.
	But in this bite, McCain explains why amnesty failed.
	Well, he first denies that it was amnesty, but then he explains why it fails.
	And his answer is pretty good on this because his answer covers far larger territory than just the immigration bill that went down the tube.
	Sit tight, all that coming up right after this.
	Boy, the time is zipping by here, folks.
	The fastest three hours in media.
	I want to, at the risk of angering people, I want to say something because none of my staff here saw the debate last night.
	And during a little exchange that I just aired between Mitt Romney and Rudy Giuliani, they're all in there eating it up.
	They're just loving it.
	But let me put this in perspective for you.
	I think Rudy's answer to Mitt is evidence that Rudy is defensive on the issue.
	Rudy didn't deny any of this stuff.
	Oh, well, you're Sanctuary Mansion.
	Well, you're Sanctuary City.
	Well, you're saying the fact of the matter is, take a look at which of these two, and I'm not sure here, take a look at which of these two is saying things right now that's most apropos about illegal immigration, shutting the borders, building a fence.
	Duncan Hunter actually, I think, won that one last night and what he would do.
	But one of these two guys' policies is what most of the Republican base wants.
	And it sort of got obfuscated here with this little tit and tat back and forth.
	It was entertaining, but it didn't advance anything.
	And after it's over, you still don't know what each other's position on illegal immigration is.
	No, you don't.
	You don't know this.
	You don't know whether they'd build a fence.
	You don't know whether they would enforce border security for you don't know it yet.
	You just not by virtue of that answer.
	You may know it because of previous appearances, but you don't know it by virtue of that answer.
	The base oh, wait a second, Snergly, wait a second, wait a second.
	Snergly said the base knows already who's conservative and who isn't, and I said so myself.
	I have no more said any such thing.
	What have you been listening to?
	You've been listening to Air America news that I said there last night.
	I said there was one.
	What that debate brought forth for me last night was that a lot of the top-tier candidates have in their past, as governors, policies and behaviors that are not conservative.
	All right?
	That's what I'm just last night.
	That's what struck out or stuck out at me.
	Anyway, I don't want to belabor this because we could sit here all day and discuss this.
	I'm just trying to share with you what I see when I watch these things.
	The entertainment value is one thing.
	I try to get past this.
	This is serious stuff.
	And there are definite things we want on this issue of illegal immigration.
	Look, this is all going to sort itself out down the road.
	Mr. Snergly, if there is one stand-above-em-all conservative in this race, how come the leader in the national polls right now, in the primaries, has 32%, and that's Rudy?
	I think the fact that they don't see a full-fledged down-the-road conservative in this race is why.
	You got the leader at 32, then the next guy at 28, and 32, 26 is beating Hillary.
	Well, the most important thing right now is national security, which dovetails to immigration, but don't forget the tax business and so forth.
	But we're talking conservatism here, not issues.
	I'm just telling you that if there were an unarguable, inarguable, through-the-roof Reagan conservative, he'd be at 60% or certainly over 50.
	I'm not criticizing anybody here.
	I'm just, and maybe I'm too anal about this.
	I just don't want conservatism here to get watered down to be something that it isn't.
	Pure and simple.
	I got nothing against any of these guys.
	I like them all.
	I respect them all.
	I admire them all.
	Pure and simple.
	Here's McCain.
	Anderson Cooper.
	Senator McCain, let me bring you back to the question that was asked by the YouTube user.
	You were willing to veto any immigration bill that involved amnesty for those who have come here illegally.
	Yes, of course.
	And we never proposed amnesty.
	But, you know, this whole debate.
	Come on, please.
	Let him answer.
	You know, this whole debate saddens me a little bit because we do have a serious situation in America.
	We tried to get something done.
	We said we'd enforce the borders.
	The American people didn't believe us.
	They don't believe us because of our failure in Katrina, our failure in Iraq, our failures in reigning in corruption and out-of-control spending.
	So we tried, and we failed.
	And I appreciate the president's efforts.
	He comes from a border state, too.
	And what we've learned is that the American people want the borders enforced.
	We must enforce the border, secure the borders first.
	But then you've still got two other aspects of this issue that have to be resolved as well.
	And we need to sit down as Americans and recognize these are God's children as well.
	We cut it off there, but that got a huge applause line from the audience.
	And in addition to God's children, where Huckabee talked about this, Huckabee talked about, because he's in Arkansas, he had some illegal immigration proposals for children that would let them go to school and paid for by the taxpayers and so forth.
	And he said, look, we're compassionate people.
	These are children.
	We can't punish them for the crimes of their parents.
	Their parents are the ones that came here illegally.
	I was sitting there saying, I got an answer to this, Governor Huckabee.
	If you're not going to punish the kids, if you're going to go ahead and pay for their education and do all the, you're just writing an incentive for more parents to come across the border and give birth.
	At some point, this has to stop.
	Yeah, we've got, McCain's right.
	We've got a couple of three phases of this problem.
	But one of the first phase that's got to happen is secure the border and stop the flood of illegals coming in.
	And as long as there are incentives on this side of the border to come in, and it's a big incentive to have your kid born here when you're illegal, get all this aid and so forth to go to school and so forth, it's an incentive for them to come.
	Does that sound cruel and cold-hearted, Mr. Snirdley?
	Well, I'm not talking about smears right now.
	I'm just talking about Huckabee's answer to the illegal alien question.
	We don't have it on tape.
	And don't cookie, don't go get it, because I want to move on here.
	We do have Huckabee here on what was a lot of people thought he won the thing last night, his sense of humor, his presence, his personality.
	Governor Huckabee, 30 seconds, three programs that you would eliminate.
	Patterson, the first thing that I would get rid of would be the Internal Revenue Service.
	Get rid of the IRS, and that would count for most of the problems.
	Most people in this country are more afraid of an audit than they are of mugging, and there's a reason why.
	Okay, let me ask you a question about this.
	Now, a lot of people say, well, good answer.
	Are we ever going to get rid of the IRS?
	Are we ever going to get rid of the current tax code?
	I hate to be a bummer.
	I'm not giving up on this, but I just want to tell you what the challenge is.
	I know because there's all these advocates out there, the flat tax and the fair tax.
	I like them all.
	I like Neil Borts and John Linders' idea, the fair tax, Steve Forbes and his flat text.
	They're all out there.
	But my friends, and I know people are saying, well, why don't you lead on this?
	Why don't you lead on it?
	If something can't be done, only you can get it not done.
	And that is this.
	If you expect these members of the House of Representatives, people like Charles Wrangel and everybody in the Ways and Means Committee to give up that power, they're the ones that write the tax code.
	And they're lobbyist buddies.
	That's the greatest single power these guys have.
	And to give that up on their own for whatever valid, valorous reasons, it ain't going to happen.
	We're talking social architecture.
	We're talking punishment of political enemies.
	We are talking reward for political friends.
	To give up the social architecture, and for somebody to actually come up and elected officials, we're going to get rid of the IRS.
	That's something that is not going to happen.
	Next question.
	Anderson Cooper said to Governor Huckabee, I do have to press the question.
	The question was to the viewer, what would Jesus do?
	Would Jesus support the death penalty?
	Jesus was too smart to ever run for public office, Anderson.
	That's what Jesus would do.
	The death penalty is, you know, this is not a tough biblical question.
	You just don't want to answer it.
	But not only is the death penalty in our founding documents, no one shall be deprived of life, liberty, pursuit of happiness without due process, meaning a trial.
	It is also recognized throughout the Bible.
	But here again, you have a situation.
	These questions that are being asked, these YouTube questions are more designed to expose conservatives as the racist bigots, sexists, and homophobes that liberals think they are.
	Now, what was this theoretically?
	Theoretically, this was a debate for Republicans to learn about Republicans.
	Republican voters to learn about these Republican candidates.
	It was not that.
	This is another example of a left-wing drive-by media exposing conservatives for who they think they are.
	All right, we'll come back.
	We've got more audio, but I'm going to get to your phone calls right after this.
	As to this death penalty question and what would Jesus do?
	How many of you are familiar with the Old Testament?
	How about if you could go back and ask Pharaoh about what God would do?
	Just go back and ask Pharaoh what God would do.
	In the Old Testament, what would Jesus do?
	This is so asinine.
	The whole thing, it just, you know, it's fine.
	It is, you know, when conservatives bring up Jesus, oh, wow.
	Why?
	They want to impose their religion on him.
	What a bunch of, they're kooks, they're freaks.
	Wait, next thing you're going to know, they're going to want to build antimony scene.
	We can't hit when a liberal kook weirdo from his basement asks, what would Jesus do?
	The liberals go, oh, how clever.
	How clever.
	Look at the squirming, trapped Republicans now.
	I detest these people, folks.
	I literally detest them.
	Bob in Plymouth, Massachusetts.
	Welcome to the EIB Network.
	Hello.
	Hello, Rush.
	Long time, first time.
	Thank you.
	The thing I kept waiting for last night, now I know these questions are all hand-picked by CNN, was the fact that nobody asked about global warming.
	Now, isn't that one of the big issues with the Democratic Party?
	And, you know, why were none of those questions asked?
	My theory is that they would be afraid that the Republicans would chop it to pieces.
	That's my theory.
	Perhaps.
	They're protecting Al Gore and the global warming industry and so forth.
	But I don't know that they would know that for sure.
	But the point of your question is exactly what I was trying to say earlier in the program.
	There is so much that didn't get discussed other than clichéd conservatism, which was on other than immigration, most of the rest of it was clichéd conservatism.
	Speaking of global warming, I was going to do this today.
	I don't know.
	I may still try.
	Don't know if I'm going to have time.
	This, folks, is absolutely hilarious.
	Dr. John Brignell, a British engineering professor, runs a website called Number Watch.
	He's compiled what has to be the most complete collection of links to media stories ascribing the cause of everything under the sun to global warming.
	Has already posted more than 600 links to media stories blaming X, whatever it is on global warming.
	I have all of these links here.
	They print out the three pages, and I'm going to read them all.
	All 600 links.
	We're going to post this from the American thinker today, Chris, Christopher Aliba.
	We're going to post this at Rush Limbo.
	We're going to link to it so you can go through this yourself.
	But let me just give you a head start here.
	Agricultural land increase.
	Africa devastated.
	African aid threatened.
	Africa hit hardest.
	Air pressure changes.
	Alaska reshaped.
	Allergies increase.
	Alps melting.
	Amazon a desert.
	American dream end.
	Amphibians breeding earlier or not.
	Ancient forest dramatically changed.
	Animals head for the hills.
	Antarctic grass flourishes.
	Anxiety.
	Algae blooms.
	Archaeological sites threatened.
	Arctic bogs melt.
	Arctic in bloom.
	Arctic lakes disappear.
	Asthma.
	Atlantic less salty.
	Atlantic more salty.
	Atmospheric defiance.
	Atmospheric circulation modified.
	Attack of the killer jellyfish.
	Avalanches reduced.
	Avalanches increased.
	Bananas destroyed.
	Bananas grow.
	Beetle infestation.
	Bet for $10,000.
	Better beer.
	Big melt faster.
	Billion-dollar research projects.
	Billions of deaths.
	Bird distribution.
	It's all in alphabetical order.
	Keep going.
	Bird visitors drop.
	Birds return early.
	Blackbirds stop singing.
	Blizzards.
	Blue mussels return.
	Blue tongue.
	Boredom.
	Bridge collapse.
	Minneapolis.
	Britain Siberian.
	British mussels return.
	Gardens change.
	Brothels struggle.
	Bubonic plague.
	Budget increases.
	Buddhist temple threatened.
	Building collapse.
	Building season extension.
	Brush fires.
	Bushfires.
	Business opportunities.
	Business risks.
	Butterflies move north.
	Cancer deaths in England.
	Cardiac arrest.
	Caterpillar biomass shift.
	Challenges and opportunities.
	Childhood insomnia.
	Cholera.
	Circumcision in decline.
	Sirius disappearance.
	Civil unrest.
	Cloud increase.
	Cloud stripping.
	Cockroach migration.
	Cod go south.
	Cold climate creatures survive.
	Cold spells.
	Australia.
	Computer models.
	Conferences.
	Coral bleaching.
	Coral reefs dying.
	Coral reefs grow.
	Coral reefs shrink.
	Cold spells.
	Cost of trillions.
	Cougar attacks.
	Cremation to end.
	Crime increase.
	Crocodile sex.
	Crumbling roads.
	Buildings and sewage systems.
	Cyclones, Australia.
	Damages equivalent to 200 billion.
	Darfur.
	Dartford warbler plague.
	Death rate increase.
	Dingy hemorrhagic fever.
	Dermatitis.
	Desert advance.
	Desert life threaten.
	Desert retreat.
	Destruction of the environment.
	Diarrhea.
	Disappearance of coastal cities.
	Diseases move north.
	Dilamities collapse.
	Drought.
	Drowning people.
	Ducks and geese decline.
	Dust bowl in the corn belt.
	Early marriages.
	Early spring.
	Earlier pollen season.
	Earth biodiversity crisis.
	Earth dying.
	Earth even hotter.
	Earth light dimming.
	Earth lopsided.
	Earth down.
	Earth spinning out of control.
	Earth morbid fever.
	Earth on fast track.
	Earth past point of no return.
	Earth slowing down.
	Earth spinning out of control.
	Earth spins faster.
	Earth to explode.
	Earth upside down.
	Earth wobbling.
	Earthquakes.
	El Niño intensification.
	Erosion.
	Emerging infections.
	Encephalitis.
	Equality threatened.
	Europe simultaneously baking and freezing.
	Evolution accelerating.
	Expansion of university climate groups.
	Extinctions.
	Human civilization.
	Logic Inuit.
	Smallest butterfly, cod, ladybirds, it goes on and on.
	I'm just at the ease.
	600 different links here that you can click on where every one of these that you've heard me mention has been blamed on global warming in the Drive-By Media.
	In other words, folks, everything now, everything is caused by global warming.
	I've heard from Grover Norquist.
	He just sent his YouTube video in.
	I was wondering if they contacted him to balance out whatever they were going to choose, but he's not just recorded and sent it in.
	So sorry about that, Grover.
	And a brief timeout here, folks.

▲