All Episodes
Previous Next
Nov. 15, 2007 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:03
November 15, 2007, Thursday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Greetings, my friends, and welcome back.
It's Rush Limbaugh behind this, the golden EIB microphone in the era of Rush Limbaugh.
A man, a living legend, a national treasure, and a way of life.
Here at the Limbaugh Institute for Advanced Conservative Studies, our telephone number is 800-282-2882 and the email address rush at EIBnet.com.
Did you think about what I asked you to think about prior to the break here at the top of the hour?
If you're just joining us and you haven't had a chance to think about it because you didn't hear me, let me briefly review.
Kathleen Parker, syndicated column, urging men do not criticize Mrs. Clinton's appearance in the presence of women or your wife, because you will drive your wife or women to vote for Mrs. Clinton because no woman thinks that she looks good.
No woman thinks that she's beautiful.
Ask a woman that you think is gorgeous, what's it like to feel gorgeous?
And they will tell you, I don't.
They all think they've got some flaw.
We know this.
Now, what I asked you to think about was this.
While the theory sounds somewhat plausible based on the types of women a man has known over the course of his life, I can't help but go back to 1969 in the beginning of the modern era of feminism.
And all I heard was, don't open the door for me.
I can make my own reservations at the restaurant.
I just want to be equal.
If you're going to buy me a book, go out and buy a book on rape and read it yourself so you understand what a vile predator you can be.
I heard all of this stuff growing up as I turned 20, and I heard all the demands that men lose their jobs for less qualified women just to level the playing field.
And we want equality, and we want to be treated fairly and blah, blah, blah.
Now, all of a sudden, and during that period of time, and it's always been the case, women can say whatever they want about men.
We're predators.
We're brutes.
We're fat.
We're ugly.
We're going bald.
They can make fun of our appearance all day long.
And we're supposed to take it.
If we act like we hurt our feelings or something, why, then we're wimps.
You know the drill here.
And yet, all of a sudden, after since this 1960, 1970, 37 years of demands for equality under the rubric of feminism, it turns out that we're told by a woman, Kathleen Parker, that if you make some comment about Hillary's appearance, it's going to drive women right into voting for Hillary can't do that.
So what has become of all this quest for equality?
Well, it was always phony to begin with.
It was a demand made, but a situation not really desired.
Human nature is what it is, and we're not equal.
Men and women aren't equal.
So here we are, Mrs. Clinton, first female candidate for president, and she got to be treated like a girl.
She can't be treated like one of the guys.
She can't.
She has entered a man's world here, and she's demanding to be treated like a girl.
She played that card last week, and now we're told, don't make fun of her, don't do this, don't do that.
We can make fun of Barack Obama's ears all day long.
We can make fun of Joe Biden's hair plugs, a Kia Pet haircut that he's got, or hair transplant.
You know, we can make fun of John Kerry looking like a Labrador retriever, and people laughing at it, but we can make fun of Bush and the way he looks, or Dick Cheney, but we're told we can't do that with a woman deemed to be the most powerful woman in the country running for president.
We can't do this.
And if we do, it's going to drive women right into her camp.
So where is all this?
Where's this quest for equality?
I'll tell you what, this quest for equality has become the chickification of our culture and our society.
And you know it and I know it.
Chickification's taken over the schools.
It's taken over much of local television media.
Look at the stories you get at the nightly news on your local station.
And it'll be about the dangers in the sandbox at the preschool, which is not news.
But that's what it'll be.
Or it'll be how men are leaving their wives or stranding their wives or not paying the bills, the child support and all that.
They've been totally chickified.
And then there's this, this just cleared the wire during the top of the hour break.
Mary Ann Means, who is a columnist for Hearst newspapers in Washington, this headline is laughable.
Hillary Clinton fights back like a man.
Quite the opposite.
Quite fights back like a man.
She sends her husband out there to explain her gaffes.
She plays the gender card and says she can't hit the girl.
We all knew that gender would inevitably be the subtext of New York Senator Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign.
But the surprise, writes Mary Ann Means, is that the issue has erupted so early with so much venom.
It may actually be a good thing to get it all out in the open right away.
The candidate herself says she thinks her rivals are attacking her because she's the runaway frontrunner and therefore the fattest target.
Mary Ann Means said that, not me.
Let it, Kathleen Parker, it was Mary Ann Means here that just called Hillary the fattest target.
Just reading from the piece, not simply because she's a female, she's both accurate and generous.
This is not a picnic.
She can't be patronized.
The fate of previous female presidential aspirants, such as Elizabeth Dole, North Carolina.
Hillary Clinton's tough and must be confronted, and she fights back like a man.
This is so full of crap.
This is, this is, it is, folks.
How does she fight back like a man?
She says, don't hit me.
Don't hit me.
I'm a woman.
She's trying to immunize herself from criticism by hiding behind her gender.
Men don't do that.
This is what the women drive-bys call fighting back by sending your husband out there.
Don't hit me, don't hit me.
You can't hit me.
I'm a girl.
I mean, this whole thing is hard to get through.
Let me give you a couple of more quotes.
It all surfaced dramatically in the October 30th debate.
One of the moderators singled her out for attack, Tim Russert.
See, it's exactly my point.
She was asked a question.
What about driver's license for illegals in New York and Governor Spitzer's plant?
That's an attack to the modern era of feminists who wanted equality.
You can't even ask a female candidate a question without it being called an attack.
The men were over the top.
Their complaints about her vague answers not particularly useful.
The men were over the top, her opponents.
So not only can the moderator not attack her with a question, her opponents can't even get in the game by disagreeing with her because that too is over the top and attack.
I'm sure Mary Ann Means thinks that she's a leading feminist out there.
Let's see.
That set off a boys versus girls fracas.
Clinton referred to the presidency as an old boys club, perfectly accurate, but not terribly politic.
Her rivals and some whining females complained she was unfairly playing the gender victim card.
Nitt Romney, who is increasingly the meanest candidate in the game.
Mary Ann, do you know who the meanest candidate in this game is?
It's Hillary!
Hillary Clinton is Nurse Ratchet.
She is the meanest candidate.
Mitt Romney?
Senator McCain, the GOP Class Act.
When was this written?
This is yesterday.
So she might have written this before the BIH question that he got.
Let's see.
Moving on.
The media and her rivals tried to make a big deal of the fact that some Clinton staffers suggested questions that those attending Clinton rallies could ask the candidate.
CNN, normally a sensible news outlet, labeled it Plantgate.
Oh, for pity's sake.
The Bush White House regularly controls those who get to see the president.
He never goes anywhere.
It's not a military installation or an otherwise protected pre-screened environment.
Why didn't CNN call that Coward Gate?
See, this is exactly what I was asking you to think about.
We have been told for 40 years women want to be equal, and now she's in the presidential race, and anything that said that is the starkest criticism is unfair.
It's an attack because she's a girl.
And then this ridiculous assertion that she fights back like a man.
Another book, Women for President by Erica Falk, contends the male-dominated media is biased against female candidates.
The male-dominated media, the media has been chick-ified.
Well, that was a quarter century ago, so now at last we've come to Hillary, and her critics portray her just as the book predicts, chilly because she's professional, politically cagey and efficient, just the qualities we look for in male leaders.
Really?
Now, that proves another point.
What do feminist women think of men?
Professional, cagey, efficient?
Just what we look for in male leaders?
Again, that's Mary Ann means.
So such a disconnect here.
It's an amazing disconnect on something as simple as reality.
Brief time out here, folks, a little long here in this segment.
Back before you know it.
Meeting and surpassing all audience expectations daily.
Rush Limbaugh in the era of Limbaugh.
Your highly trained broadcast specialist to Sarasota, Florida.
This is Paul.
I'm glad you waited, and welcome.
Hey, Rush Mega Dendos.
Thanks for everything you're doing out there.
Thank you.
I just wanted to, first of all, I got to say, waiting on hold for you was absolutely awesome because you get to listen to all the parodies and it really puts you in a good mood.
Yeah, I'm going to play more of these more often because some of them are, especially some of the most recent ones.
They're a hoot.
I'm glad you reminded me of that.
Oh, yeah, they're great.
My question in your call screener said that you probably answered this yesterday.
Unfortunately, I clean polls for a living, so I'm in and out of the truck all day.
My question was, do you think Spitzer's reversal on this driver's license issue was a result of the Clinton machine?
Yes.
And if it was, then do you think they did that on purpose to make it a quote-unquote non-issue for Hillary so it would kind of go away?
Yes.
The line that I used yesterday was I asked anybody if they had seen Governor Spitzer on a rowboat in Lake Placid with Don Vito Clinton Leone.
Because, well, look, there's a pattern here.
Remember the problem that Senator Bob Torricelli got in trouble in in New Jersey?
Yeah.
And his corruption problem is plummeting in the polls.
And he had a meeting with Don Vito Clinton Leone.
And he resigned, and he started crying, and he thanked Bill Clinton for all that he had done for him.
Why thank Bill Clinton?
And then Andrew Cuomo was running for something, maybe mayor of New York, I forget which.
And Don Clinton Leone asked him to step aside or else.
But it's not just me.
Fred Dicker, who is a reporter for the New York Post in Albany, he's their head honcho of their bureau chief up there, was on hardball yesterday afternoon.
And Chris Matthews said, Do you know if Hillary Clinton had anything to do with Spitzer's decision to do his 180?
And Fred Dicker said, Yeah, we believe she did.
We were told, I was told at a very high level in New York politics that Mrs. Clinton's campaigner, some of her top people, signaled to Governor Spitzer's people that he had damaged her.
They were wondering what the heck he was up to.
Why did he bring it to the floor now, made it clear the governor was hurting her, and he ought to back down if he wanted to help her, which he says he wants to do.
Question from Matthews, is anybody in his office saying that?
Or are you getting that from a third party?
Is anybody in Spitzer's office saying the governor got the word from Hillary to cut it?
Dicker, in his camp, but not his office, but at the highest levels.
Well, how does it work?
Matthews said, Did she send word through New York politicians that it was hurting her?
Well, first of all, Spitzer's a smart guy, Dicker said, and he's aware of what happened.
Secondly, they travel in similar circles.
High-level consultants talk with one another.
Governors, political consultants, and advisors were advised as to the damage that was done here, and that's how it was relayed.
Now, you understand here, Paul, what Fred Dicker just said.
Mrs. Clinton who botched this, it was Mrs. Clinton who botched the answers, Mrs. Clinton.
She gets mad at Spitzer for hurting her.
Right, right.
Again, again, the chickification of the world and of the country, because the bottom line here is, yes, Spitzer, he was doing what he wanted to do for New York, and Mrs. Clinton had got in the way without being asked about it.
If she was really that concerned, she should have told him, get that out of there now.
I'm going to get asked about this, and I don't want to be asked about it.
And so she gets asked about it, is unprepared, doesn't have an answer, flip-flops, and then puts pressure on Spitzer to pull it because he's hurting her.
I know this.
Look, folks, this goes on in politics.
Don't misunderstand.
I'm just saying that this is the kind of use of raw power.
And he's not some demure little girl here that's being beaten up on by the guys.
Here she is beating up a guy.
Hey, Elliot, you pull that.
You pull that from your agenda.
I don't care if it's going to help you.
I don't care if it's going to hurt you because it ain't about you, Elliot.
It's about me.
So you pull that.
Now, we're supposed to sit here and not be critical because Mrs. Clinton is a girl.
Thanks for the call, Paul.
Kay in Spencer, Iowa.
You're next in the EIB network.
Hello.
Hi, Rush.
I've just been listening to you talk about Mrs. Clinton and her position on driver's licenses for illegals.
And the thing that I really have enjoyed is watching Barack Obama pile on her.
But my question for you is, what is his position on driver's licenses for illegals?
And I really think that this goes to the core of what you've been talking about with the girl thing.
And we need to ask these candidates this thing.
They need to be on the tire.
They didn't have to be asked because in the October 30th debate in Philadelphia, when Hillary, you know, fumbled and mumbled her way through this, they all came out and said it was a stupid idea to give driver's license to illegals.
And I think Obama was one of those who did.
I know that Chris Dodd did.
I know that Edwards did.
And I think Obama was one that we have it on the soundbite somewhere, but I think Obama has addressed this.
In fact, did you hear the statement that his spokesman released yesterday?
Wow, this is fabulous.
When it takes two weeks and six different positions to answer one question on immigration, it's easier to understand why the Clinton campaign would rather plant their questions than answer them.
I mean, that's that's now that's a hard-hitting statement.
I wonder if Mary Ann Means or other feminist women are going to get on Obama's case for being mean to Hillary.
Make a lot of good points, too.
You know, she can't stand up to the men asking her a few uncomfortable questions.
And how is she ever going to stand up to some of these tyrannical rulers?
That's the thing.
She can stand up to them.
She's just relying on this.
She's trying to get women, and she's just relying on this poor, weak set upon victim.
She plays the victim perfectly.
And so that's, and she's got a lot of feminist reporters coming along now helping her establish that image as a victim.
You don't doubt for a moment, do you, she can stand up to these guys?
Well, I really kind of do.
I don't know.
I guess I don't have a lot of confidence in the state of the world and some of the enemies that we have in our world right now.
Well, the way it appears that she can't stand up to him is I don't think it's not because she's afraid of them.
I frankly think she doesn't like them.
Yeah.
I think it's because she doesn't want to have to get specific about anything.
And that's where this driver's license thing really bummed her out because she had to take a specific position.
And she's now in great contradiction because in these past two weeks, she has said she is totally in favor of amnesty, the comprehensive immigration reform.
Now she's been forced to say, no way should illegal immigrants get driver's licenses.
In fact, she even said, to give you an idea of her arrogance, she said, when I'm president, no illegal will get a driver's license.
Well, I'm sorry, Mrs. Clinton, but presidents don't have purview over that.
The states do.
Well, I don't know.
I'm just glad that Tim Russert actually took that leap and tried to nail her down on this because she's not the only one that needs to be nailed down on this.
Exactly right.
This is a bad issue for the Democrats and more and more drive-by media members who advise Democrats via their drive-by columns.
David Broder's just the latest today, which I'll share with you here in just a second.
No, this is a huge trouble for them, as is the issue of taxes.
Now, your point about being about how she'll stand up to these thugs around the world, it's not that she won't stand up to them.
It's who among them she will like and admire.
Okay, I misspoke.
Barack Obama is for illegal aliens getting driver's licenses.
Check that out and found out that I was wrong about that.
I am watching.
For some reason, I find this just amazing.
And I've asked Joe up at the audio booth here to get me some audio that the president is announcing federal government plans to deal with the flight delays, the overcrowded planes and so forth.
And to listen to him go through it and look at the facial expressions that he's using.
I'm going to have trouble.
I'm not laughing.
I'm just amazed at this in a number of levels.
It's good, and he's telling the airlines what for.
He said, you people that are responsible for moving people around, you understand there are going to be consequences when you fail to do it.
And one of the things that he's proposing, if you get bumped off a flight because it's oversold and you have to wait more than two hours, they give you 400 bucks.
Bush's plan, we're going to make it 800.
And if you miss by a day, it's going to go up to four figures.
They're going to have to reimburse you.
We need to have consequences here for these carriers that are not making commitments on what they're promising people.
Get them from point A to point B. We're going to put kiosks up.
We're going to put extra baggage handlers in there.
We're going to put new ticketing locations up.
We're going to do that.
The president of the United States is telling the air system how the hell it's going to run.
People are fed up with this.
They are totally fed up with it.
I hear complaints constantly.
And I know that you experienced them, snurdly experienced it.
And Thanksgiving is what's driving all of this.
The expected number of travelers.
Another thing that they're going to do is order the FAA to open unused military airspace to commercial flights.
That'll help reduce delays caused by weather and holiday congestion.
What that means is, if you ever wondered why, or maybe you've never even cared, let's say you're on your airline flight and you're either at 33 or 35 or 37 and maybe 39,000 feet.
You're never at 32.
You're never at 34.
Some of that is military space and they require 1,000 feet between flights that are intersecting.
Some fight, it's east to west and west to east.
They determine altitudes.
But the even-numbered altitudes, I don't think, somebody that's an expert will probably correct me on this if I'm wrong, but I think even-numbered altitudes are reserved for non-commercial use, military and that sort of thing.
Plus, certain low altitudes as well are reserved for military.
And of course, the commercials don't want to go down there and burn up too much fuel flying low.
You need to get up there where the air is thin, that you burn less fuel and cause less global warming because it takes less energy to go through thin air, to fly through thin air.
But it was just fascinating to me to listen to this, the detail with which the president is taking over this system that is out of control.
Now, I understand the problem, but I have another take on this, or an additional take, not an opposite take.
Having to fly anywhere these days is not glamorous like it used to be.
It's not fun.
And the stress, of course, is heading to the airport, not even knowing if your plane's going to be there, not even knowing if it's going to leave on.
Oh, that's another thing.
They're setting up a website.
I want to see this work.
The federal government is setting up a website.
The president read off the website.
American people need to know this website.
It's faa.ontime.gov.
That's not it.
The feds are going to have a website that anybody can go to to determine whether their flight is on time.
It's www.fly.faa.gov.
That's what it is.
Fly.faa.gov.
And nah, I can't crash a federal government server.
But people are going to go there.
And I want to see that work.
If the federal government can keep a website with flight delays updated nationwide, I have to see this happen.
I mean, the airlines have their own individual websites where you can check and see for flights on time.
And sometimes you don't trust what you see there because you don't know how often it's being updated.
I just, I want to see this work.
But however, you know me, folks.
I try to find the positive in as much as I can.
And we're heading into the holidays here.
And we've got the usual drive-by hysteria about safety and congestion.
And it's the biggest travel day of the year.
But the fact of the matter is, why is all that a factor?
It is a factor because people are spending the money to fly places.
People have the money to do that, and they have and are taking the time.
People want to go places.
They want to see their family or friends, or in some cases, get away from their family and friends.
But regardless, they're on the move.
And people are not fearful.
They just want the system to work.
So this is a testament here to the growing economy and the fact that the people want to use the air traffic system to get where they're going.
They have the money to do it, is what is creating some of this.
And by the way, I think you give the Bush administration some credit for this.
Why are so many people flying without fear?
Because there haven't been any more hijacking since 9-11.
You've got to put up with a lot of grief when you go check in and so forth.
And it's kind of embarrassing to watch some 80-year-old grandmother get strip searched.
But, you know, it is what it is.
Here is Nancy in Great Neck, New York.
Nancy, I'm glad you waited.
Welcome to the Rush Limbaugh program.
Oh, hello.
Hi.
Oh, Rush.
Oh, thank you so much for taking my call.
This is such a pleasure.
It's such a treat.
You have no idea.
I'm very nervous, so please bear with me.
I will.
I'm glad you're in the middle.
I was listening to you talking about the chickification of society, and I couldn't agree with you more.
You look at the sitcoms.
You look at all the television programs that make men out to be the dumbest things on the face of the earth.
And it's insulting.
It is absolutely insulting.
Men are kind of like whitebread milquetoast these days, the liberal men that I see around in my area.
You are a woman right online to my heart.
Thank you so much.
But what I wanted to call about was we were talking about Hillary before and her this poor don't hit me, don't attack me, and I'm a woman, I'm a woman.
Well, remember what we consider here in New York, I believe, the fatal mistake that Rick Lazio made during the Senate debates when he stood up and he approached Hillary.
Yes.
That was taken as such a confrontational, such a male.
He invaded her space, Nancy.
He absolutely did.
Now, there are a lot of us who believe that that was such a fatal mistake that that could have been one of the reasons why she got the Senate seat.
Now, if she thinks that it worked then, her whole image might be to turn things around.
All of this is.
Oh, she's already said that.
This is in their playbook, the Lazio strategy.
They've already admitted that they're playing this card again.
When they played the gender card last week, that's what this was all about.
I talk to you every day on the radio, and I've tried calling numerous times.
This is the first chance I've had to get through, and I just wanted to say thank you so much for bringing rational, thoughtful discussion, and your take on everything just calms my nerves and makes me less afraid of the nuts that are out there when you can dissect everything and make it so much sense.
Well, I appreciate it.
That's very nice.
That is very, very, very perceptive of you, and you're very nice to say it.
Thank you so much.
Thank you so much, Rush.
And keep going.
Keep up with the great work.
All right, we'll do.
This is Bill.
Let's go on the phone from Amon Jordan.
We're probably going to have some delay here, right, on a satellite.
No delay.
Bill, welcome to the program, sir.
Hi, Rush.
Mega Dittos from the other side of the world.
Thank you.
What time is it there?
It is about quarter to nine at night.
That's exactly right.
Quarter to ten in Dubai.
Maybe a quarter of a late.
Yeah, that's right.
Can you still hear me okay?
Yeah.
Oh, I hear you fine.
I was just waiting for you to continue.
Okay, I'm sorry.
My question or/slash comment was: Have you considered who Hillary's running mate might be?
And I think I have the answer.
Who?
General Wesley Clark.
The more interesting question to me is: would Hillary accept the vice presidential nod from one of the other candidates, say from John Edwards or from Barack Obama?
I think if she's smart, and I hope she's not, but I think if she is, she will find a way to overcome her lack of support within the military ranks by choosing somebody like General Clark.
Interesting thought.
General Clark has unfortunately gone off the deep end.
General Clark is not all that rational these days.
Maybe it gets them back.
In all candor, and this is the conventional wisdom, so it's probably wrong, but the real Hillary Clinton frontrunner for the VEEP is Evan Bay out of Indiana.
That's who people think that it's going to be.
And it's not going to be any of these chumps that are on the stage because once she wipes you out as a chump, she's not going to revive you and make you a competitor for her office.
Bill, what do you do before I go real quickly?
What do you do in Amon Jordan?
Oh, Rush, I was afraid you were going to ask that.
Oh, it's even better.
You can't tell me.
That's even more exciting, right?
You can't tell me.
That's true.
I'm sorry.
That's okay.
So the liberals in the audience, Bill, have concluded you work for Blackwater.
Yes.
Well, not so.
No, not so.
But I do have a long military history.
My wife is former military.
I'm former military.
I have a daughter serving in Baghdad, and I have a son in the Marine Corps.
Probably going to go there in the spring.
Wow.
Well, God bless you and your family, and thank you for the phone call.
Thank you, Rush, and God bless you.
You bet.
We'll be back after this, my friends.
Don't vanish.
Back before you know it.
Okay, I need to do some research real fast.
I just saw a very quick blurb on one of the cable channels that an appeals court has thrown out new fuel standards for SUVs and minivans.
Now, I would assume that these new fuel standards require more gas mileage, smaller engines, whatever, the cafe standards, because we're not, you know, nobody's ordering anybody to lower gas mileage these days.
So I'm figuring that the appeals court's thrown out some, well, they have thrown out some new fuel standards for SUVs and minivans.
I got to get the details.
And this story, this, I read it as a how can this be?
And then I see that it's published at the Telegraph in the UK.
Republicans winning new citizens for 2008 vote.
Minutes after taking the Pledge of Allegiance, new American citizens are urged to register as voters by Democrat activists who see them as natural party supporters who can hold a key to the 2008 election.
But with increasing illegal immigration threatening the economy and the security of the U.S., many legal immigrants, anxious to uphold the laws of their adopted country, are moving towards the more hardline immigration stance of Republicans.
Even in California's Democrat stronghold of San Diego, sizable numbers of America's newly minted potential voters said that illegal immigrants should be penalized rather than given an easy route to citizenship, as most Democrats advocate.
For a long time, immigration was okay, said Sarah Wright, 49, a seamstress from Mexico, who arrived legally here in 1986.
But now, no more.
A lot of really bad people come from Mexico and commit crimes.
People are coming in having two, three, four babies going on welfare.
Some are making money here and sending it back to Mexico.
So the dirty little secret is that the naturalized citizens, legal immigrants who become citizens, who are then hit on as they leave the courthouse by Democrat activists to vote and register Democrat, are registering Republican.
How can this be?
We have been told that drive-bys, year after year, day after day, report after report, drive-bys have stated categorically that Latin American voters are just waiting to emasculate any politician who advocates a harsh line on U.S. immigration policy.
So much of this reporting is so wrong.
And the idea, this is another point that I have to make.
The idea that we have to support illegals and grant them amnesty as Republicans in order to get their votes, this disprove.
We've all known that's BS.
It's never worked out that way anyway.
But now legal immigrants who become citizens are joining and voting and registering Republican because they resent the fact that a bunch of illegals are the targets of the Democrat Party for legality, amnesty.
Look at it this way.
Why would you give an illegal immigrant a legal document?
A driver's license.
Once you do that, once you give an illegal immigrant a legal document, they're no longer illegal.
And let me ask you this question.
Do you think there's ever been a country that never cared who entered it?
You think there's ever been a country that just said, you know what?
We're going to get rid of our borders.
You want to come?
Come.
Well, no, the Indians, the Indians didn't know what was coming.
The Native American India, they didn't know what was coming.
Yes, that's a good example.
Okay, yeah, they didn't protect the borders, and look what happened.
But they weren't staffed up to protect the borders.
But regardless, the idea that we should have no idea who's coming here, and this is the Democrat Party position, and this is why they're hanging out on it, folks.
They are really exposed on this.
You don't give illegal aliens legal documents, but you've made them legal.
What's the meaning of illegal anymore?
And if you're not going to control a border and care about who comes into the country, you're not going to have a country.
In fact, if you don't have borders, you're not going to have a country.
Thank you, Democrat Party.
They have stepped in it big time on this.
And they're not going to be able to get out of this.
No way.
There was a ninth circus on this fuel standards being thrown out.
And as I suspected, it doesn't make sense.
It's not a good thing what they've done.
And these are pretty stringent standards, the new cafe and mileage standards that they established, but they're not stringent enough.
The environmentalist wackos won.
When I saw that was from the ninth circus, that's all I needed to hear.
All right.
See, where did this hour go?
It's over.
But another one's right around the corner.
So sit tight, my friends.
Rush Limbaugh, the EIB Network.
Talent on loan from God.
▲
Export Selection