All Episodes
Previous Next
Nov. 14, 2007 - Rush Limbaugh Program
34:47
November 14, 2007, Wednesday, Hour #3
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Greetings and welcome back to the era of Rush Limbaugh, the Excellence in Broadcasting Network.
Nice to have you with us, folks.
Another hour of exciting broadcast excellence.
Straight ahead.
Our telephone number, if you would like to appear, is 800-282-2882.
And the email address, rush at EIBNet.com.
We're up to audio soundbite number 11, by the way, Mike.
We'll get to it here in just a second.
Republicans are seeking a retraction from the Democrats of report on the hidden costs of the war.
Senior Republicans on Congress's Joint Economic Committee called yesterday for the withdrawal of a report by the committee's Democrat staff that argues that the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan have cost more than $1.5 trillion.
Senator Brownback and Representative James Saxton, New Jersey, attacked the report on hidden costs of the wars, calling its methodology flawed and asserting factual errors.
The report issued yesterday said the wars cost nearly double the $804 billion in appropriations and requests for war funding so far.
It's estimated the wars have cost the average American family of four more than $20,000.
Folks, if this war has cost $105 trillion, that's half of the federal budget.
But more importantly, every social program that the United States Congress has introduced has never met, never been constrained by its actual proposed cost.
Social Security, Medicare, you name it, Medicaid, they all balloon beyond what we are told they are going to cost.
This is, I'll tell you what this is, it's just more of the same of the Democrats trying to sabotage victory here because they can't afford it.
They are so invested in defeat.
The surge is working.
Baghdad's calm.
People are moving back to Iraq.
Entrepreneurial capitalism is starting to break out in the place.
This is the worst thing that could happen to these people, particularly going into a presidential election year.
And I warned them, and I've tried to help them.
You know, you guys in the Democrat Party, we're going to win this.
We are the United States of America.
We're going to win it despite your attempts to secure defeat.
And you haven't done anything that will allow you to lay claim to helping win this.
They haven't done anything.
And the only way they could do that would be to come up and lie and obfuscate and say that their protests and their resolutions and their clamoring for change forced Bush into a policy that worked.
But they can't even do that.
And they've opted out of that.
They are still trying to sabotage this.
And the latest business here, Dingy Harry, suggesting lying that the Republicans better understand where the American people are on this.
The American people are nowhere near on the war in Iraq where they are on illegal immigration.
I mentioned at the top of the program that, where's this from?
This is the Daily Telegraph.
I said Australia was wrong.
No, I was right.
Even when I think I'm wrong, I'm right.
It is Australia.
Santa Claus across Sydney, Maldives Santas, are rebelling against attempts to ban their traditional greeting of ho-ho-ho in favor of ha-ha-ha.
Recruitment from Westaff, which is a company that supplies hundreds of Santas across Australia, has told its trainees that the ho-ho-ho phrase could frighten children and could even be derogatory to women.
Ho-ho-ho frightens children.
Ho-ho-ho is derogatory to women.
Two Santa hopefuls reportedly quit the course because of the hullabaloo of the ho-ho-ho.
One would-be Santa has told a Daily Telegraph he was taught not to use ho-ho-ho because it was too close to the American slang for prostitute.
He also quit.
Give me a break, Julie Gale, who runs a campaign against sexualizing children called Kids Free-to-be Kids.
We're talking about little kids who don't understand it.
Ho-ho-ho has any other connotation, nor should they.
Leave Santa alone.
Australian Childhood Foundation chief executive officer Dr. Joe Tucci said it was the latest example of political correctness, gone mad, and he is exactly right.
You know the thing about these liberals, there has to be misery all the time.
They just, there has to be, the offended have to be there all the time.
And if anybody's offended, we've got to stop whatever's doing to offend them.
It's one or five or ten.
There's a movement on.
Michelle Malkin has a piece today.
I have it somewhere here in the stack.
I'll find it before the program ends, I promise.
Don't make any comments about Santa's hair.
No comments about Santa's hair.
Don't even...
See, folks, this is why the staff does not have microphones.
Only I can hear what they say.
Thank God.
No mention of Santa's hair in the ho-ho-ho.
This is just, it's frankly absurd.
This Thanksgiving story, there's a group out there that's trying to change attitudes about Thanksgiving.
It should be a time of mourning for what happened to the Indians.
And the story is all about how Thanksgiving is a time of great misery and suffering for Thanksgiving, for Indians, because they got taken.
They gave up Manhattan for 24 bucks and some change.
They lost a whole bunch of stuff.
And so it's a time of misery and mourning.
And we should not celebrate when there's misery and mourning among us, particularly when the celebration has to do with wiping the Indians out.
This is what this website says, which is we will do on our last day here next week before Thanksgiving, we will do the true story of Thanksgiving.
We do that every year.
It's a tradition.
I wrote about it in my book.
It has nothing to do with what you were raised to believe in grade school.
It has, well, there's a little bit to do with it, but the traditional story of Thanksgiving is that the white guys came over in the boats and didn't know what to do with this rugged land.
They were starving and dying.
And the Indians came and shared a grand meal and showed them how to hunt beaver and all this stuff.
And so they plant corn.
We didn't know how to plant corn and we didn't know how to do any of that stuff.
And so Thanksgiving traditional time, I was raised believing this too, that we thanked them for saving us.
And that's not what Thanksgiving is all about.
Read the George Washington first Thanksgiving proclamation.
I defy a liberal to do it and stay sane.
It must mention God in it 30 times.
That alone would put them off.
Now we've got this story out.
I'll find it as I say.
I'll give you some of the gory details.
It's just, it's comical, but it is classic of liberals that just have to be wringing their hands at miserable and unhappy and horrible out there, Mr. Limborn.
This is bad.
By the way, this is a note of interest for those of you who unfortunately and mistakenly and lamely, oddly, Stupidly planned for a huge refund from the IRS every spring vis-a-vis your tax return.
The tax filing season is getting off to a shaky start even before it begins.
Internal revenue service officials warn that millions of people may face delays in having their returns processed next year and getting their refunds.
The problem, Congress still hasn't approved temporary relief for many people from the AMT, a parallel system.
It operates under many different rules than the regular system.
And some lawmakers predict that Congress probably won't take action until next month.
If that's the case, it could spell major trouble, Treasury and IRS officials say because it takes time for the IRS to reprogram its computerized processing systems to reflect last-minute changes made in Congress.
You know, when what's his name, Wrangell, came out with this scheme, I mentioned then they've got two weeks to get this done to give the IRS time to reprogram the computers to process returns.
And they didn't get it done in a two-week window, and hence this story.
As we look at the upcoming 2007 filing season, this is Linda Stiff.
What a great name for somebody who works in the IRS.
She's probably a big fan.
I'm sorry.
Linda Stiff, the IRS's acting commissioner.
She said, as we look at the upcoming 2007 filing season, a potential exists for us to see a problem of greater magnitude than anything we've faced in the past.
Now, there's a way around this, folks.
I mean, it's too late now, but there's a way around this.
This is not a refund.
This is money that you have let them keep that they didn't deserve.
This is taxes that have been collected.
You have been over-deducted or you over-deducted from yourself.
And they've kept the money and no interest accrues to you.
And so many people think if they get a refund check, I can remember when I was dirt poor, making $12,000 a year, and I was around people making a lot of money.
And every year the tax returns would come back.
And I had a friend always got $2,500 or $3,000 back.
And that was $3,000.
That was 25% of what I was earning at the time.
And he just thought he was screwing the government.
Man, look at what I'm getting back.
Look how great my tax accountant is.
Now, at the time, I didn't understand it, but I came to learn later that his accountant and he were idiots because that was never the government's money in the first place.
But they got to keep it.
They used it and they didn't have to pay the interest on it.
I know some people structure themselves to get a refund because that's the only way they're going to get a big pile of money at one time.
And they think that if they keep that refund, let's say it's a $1,000 refund and you get paid twice a month.
There's 24 pay periods.
So whatever $24 into $1,000 is, if that money is incrementally left, it's not as powerful to them as it is in a big lump of $1,000.
So they opt for the $1,000.
But in terms of managing money and doing it intelligently, it's a dumb thing to do because you could, if you wanted to, you're not using the money anyway.
You're letting the government have it.
Just have the discipline to save that money.
And that $1,000 at the end of the year is going to be worth more than the refund you get.
But people worry they don't have the discipline to do that.
That if they have it, they'll spend it.
So anyway, there's a way to avoid this, and that is don't get a refund.
Structure your taxes so that when you file, maybe even owe a little bit.
You've had the use of your money all year.
You can put it someplace where it'll grow some interest and so forth.
That's how the smart money does it, folks.
Trust me on this.
Yeah, I just look at this.
You know, Monday of this week, I think, I said, pose a little question.
So, folks, look at the presidential race.
What happens if Huckabee wins Iowa?
Do you realize how that would throw all the conventional wisdom out the window?
And what happens if Hillary is not the Democrat nominee?
Everybody's got all this stuff already over with.
And lo and behold, Mike Huckabee making a big move on Mitt Romney's long-held position as the frontrunner among Iowa Republicans.
According to a CBS News New York Times poll, Romney is 27% Huckabee, a strong second 21.
Just another example, folks, of how if you listen to this program, you are on the cutting edge of societal evolution.
You know, we normally don't talk about Paris Hilton on this program, but this one I can't, I just, I can't let this go.
Paris Hilton is being praised by conversational concert Touhee.
Take two.
Paris Hilton being praised by conservationists for highlighting the problem of binge drinking elephants in northeastern India.
Activists said a celebrity endorsement such as Paris Hilton's was sure to raise awareness of the plight of the pachyderms that got drunk on farmers' homemade rice beer and then go on a rampage.
The elephants get drunk all the time.
It's becoming really dangerous.
We need to stop making alcohol available to them, said Paris Hilton.
Just of all things, drunk elephants?
Paris, this is never going to fly.
You're never going to stop this.
Just give them IDs.
That's the way you solve problems like this.
Cecilia in West Bloomfield, Michigan.
Hi, it's nice to have you with us.
Oh, thank you.
It's nice to talk with you again, Rush.
I spoke with you several years ago.
Well, welcome back.
Thank you.
It was interesting.
When I saw the Rush on Drudge report, I saw that Mayor Spitzer, the governor, rather Spitzer, had rescinded his immigration license thing.
I thought that would put dear old Hillary in greater depth because he supported, he supported, she supposedly supported him in a weak way, in a way.
And so now that he's recanted, it's like, where does she stand?
And for CNN not to mention her or mention it, people are going to wonder, where is she?
That's my feeling.
Nobody's going to wonder about it if they don't bring it up until, what is it, Friday, when I point out that nobody brought it up.
The people who are going to watch this are going to miss it.
You're right, though.
Hillary Clinton did support Spitzer's plan in an editorial board meeting she had with a newspaper in New Hampshire.
And now Spitzer's taking it off the table.
A legitimate question.
Do you think he did the right thing?
I tell you right now what she's going to say.
We had a caller earlier today who got it all right.
Every one of these Democrats is going to say, Spitzer had no choice.
Don't blame him.
There's no leadership at the national level on this.
The states can't tackle this.
Immigration is a federal problem.
The borders are a federal problem.
Spitzer was just doing the best he could be.
He had no leadership at a national level.
He's horrible.
And then they're going to dump on Bush.
And they're going to dump on Republicans.
And in the old days, they would have gotten away with it without comment.
They will not get away with it without comment this time.
This is Schick in Trenton, Texas.
Hello, Schick.
Hello, sir.
An honor to speak with you, sir.
Thank you very much.
I originally called after referring to your monologue at the top of the last hour, realizing the fact that whatever the media can't find to blame on Bush, they just blame on you.
And I was going to call and just thank you for doing your patriotic duty by coming to President Bush's aid and being the other scapegoat.
But then I realized that maybe if we could just get rid of you and Bush, what a wonderful place the world would be.
And so now I'm just confused and need your help.
If we got rid of me and Bush, what a wonderful world, what a place the world would be.
Is that the question?
Facetiously, sir.
Yes, sir.
Facetiously.
Well, yes, because it's not going to happen.
I mean, Bush's presidential term, of course, will perspire.
Since I'm not subject to elections and I'm not term-limited, as the president is, I am going nowhere.
Wonderful.
I appreciate that, though.
Yes, it is.
If we're going to blame all the problems in the country on me, may as well add me to the list for the world problems as well.
All right.
You remember the other day Ron Paul reported collecting $4 million in one day.
Here's a story from Channel 11 in Dallas.
It's out of Crowley, Texas, which is 15 miles south of downtown Fort Worth.
Officials say thieves used a presidential campaign to rip people off.
Christine Horton of Crowley said that her account was charged several times to support Republican presidential candidate Ron Paul.
I'd never even heard of him, she said.
I was like, oh my God, somebody's stealing from me.
Monday, the Paul campaign made history.
They raised more than $4 million online in 24 hours for more than 36,000 contributors.
Frost Bank investigators discovered overseas thieves used Ron Paul's website to test stolen cards with $5 contributions.
The Ron Paul campaign has noticed that dozens, perhaps hundreds of these charges have occurred, said one of the finance coordinators for his campaign.
We're in the process of refunding that money.
500 credit card numbers were stolen from Frost Bank, but fraud management teams spotted the unauthorized charges and notified customers immediately.
The bank refunded money from nearly 100 customers, canceled all 500 credit cards.
The Paul campaign refunded $3,000 in stolen funds.
All right, we come back.
I've got still a lot of audio soundbites, and I got to find that story on Thanksgiving of the process.
Oh, look at this headline.
An Iranian minister said gays should be hanged.
There's a lot of stuff I have yet.
There it is.
Right here.
Okay, the Associated Press, before I found out about it, has retracted the story that incorrectly reported Paris Hilton praised by conversationists, conservation nists, for highlighting the problem of binge drinking elephants in northeastern India.
Lauria Burke, a publicist for Hilton, said she never made any comments about helping drunken elephants in India.
But the animal people are still praising Paris Hilton anyway.
People for animals Sanjita Goswami took Hilton's interest seriously and is acting as though it is still legitimate.
Anything to call attention to the cause of drunken elephants.
By the way, I've been reminded here, ladies and gentlemen, that one of our old clients, they haven't been around for a little while.
They'll be back, but they haven't been around for a little while.
The Justice Brothers actually once addressed this controversy now raging in Australia over Santa Claus's being told he can't say ho, ho, ho because it's derogatory to women and might scare children.
Okay, here's the Thanksgiving story, ladies and gentlemen.
Seattle is the location for this.
Seattle schools are using Thanksgiving to indulge in, as Michelle Malkin says, oppression studies 101.
Dear Seattle Public School staff, we recognize the amount of work that educators and staff have to do in order to fulfill our mission to successfully educate all students.
It's never as simple as preparing and delivering a lesson.
Students bring with them a host of complexities, including cultural, linguistic, and social economic diversity.
In addition, they can also bring challenges related to their social, emotional, and physical well-being.
One of our department's goals is to support you by suggesting ways to assist you in removing barriers to learning by promoting respect and honoring the diversity of our students, staff, and families.
With so many holidays approaching, we want to again remind you that Thanksgiving can be a particularly difficult time for many of our native students.
This website offers suggestions on ways to be sensitive to diverse experiences and perspectives and still make the holiday meaningful for all students.
Here, you will discover ways to help you and your students think critically and find resources where you can learn about Thanksgiving from a Native American perspective.
Eleven myths are identified about Thanksgiving.
Take a look at number 11 and begin your own deconstruction.
Myth number 11 that they are advocating teachers go look at and teach.
Thanksgiving is a happy time.
That's a myth in America.
Fact.
For many Indian people, Thanksgiving is a time of mourning, of remembering how a gift of generosity was rewarded by theft of land and seed corn, extermination of many from disease and gun, and near-total destruction of many more from forced assimilation.
As currently celebrated in this country, Thanksgiving is a bitter reminder of 500 years of betrayal returned for friendship.
This is what teachers are being suggested to look at in teaching Thanksgiving this year to their students in Seattle.
You know, the liberals in this country are trying to take this American holiday and tell us all to be mournful and unhappy about it.
And they're doing everything they can to spread that misery to as many people as possible.
They are miserably unhappy all the time.
And if something doesn't come from government, they have to trash it.
They have to destroy it.
Particularly if it is a grand American tradition, they have to destroy it.
The real story of Thanksgiving is nothing to do with the way it is taught in the public schools.
I understand some public schools they teach things to be rosy and hunky-dory, depending on how young the students are.
But the liberals these days want to just start shellacking them with negative after negative after negative.
They want to shellac them with guilt.
They want them growing up feeling embarrassed and hateful about their own country.
This is what the multicultural curricula has produced.
And it's in full swing throughout the American public school system.
Sandy in East Aurora, New York.
Nice to have you on the EIB network.
Hello.
Hello, first-time caller.
Long-time listener.
I think a very good comparison for you to make would be: take all the pork barrel spending from the beginning of the war and compare it with war costs.
And I don't, I think it would be very interesting.
Pork barrel earmarks and so forth.
You know, I agree with you.
It would be very interesting, but you don't even have to do that in order to illustrate this.
That would be a good way to do it.
But here we have a war that is being fought in the interests of U.S. national security.
Oh, absolutely.
This is one of the legitimate responsibilities of government.
Right.
If you start placing a cost on freedom, you're going to lose it.
If you put a limit on how much you will spend on freedom, you are going to lose it.
All you have to do is go find not just the pork, find the waste, the fraud, the multiple redundancies of programs in the federal government and point out to people like Harry Reid: Senator, how is it that you never complain about cost overruns on any other government program other than the war in Iraq?
No matter how frivolous.
Absolutely.
It makes me want to climb out of my skin.
Well, you should want to feel that way.
But I think even fighting this, you know, comparing dollars to dollars accepts their premise.
And I think that's where so many of us get wrong in arguing with these people: accepting their premise.
We accept the premise and argue on their terms.
It's a waste of time.
What we need to point out is why they're making the argument and why they're trying and what the purpose of it is.
They are attempting to engage this country in defeat.
They are trying to secure it.
They're doing everything they can to turn public opinion against it because we're winning.
The word victory is coming out of more and more mouths now about what's happening in Iraq, and that's the worst political outcome for the Democrats possible.
So comparing dollar amounts and so forth is it would be interesting and so forth, but it just accepts their premise.
I hate accepting the premises of all these liberal arguments.
Let's go to Moscow, Idaho.
This is Terry.
Nice to have you with us on the EIB network.
Hello.
Hi, Rush.
Hey, thanks for taking my call.
You back.
Real quick on that point number 11 from the Seattle School District.
I was thinking those people actually are part of the problem.
They're the oppressors they're talking about, and they should figure out what to do about it.
Who's the oppressor?
I lost you there.
Who are the oppressors?
Okay, the teachers.
The people that actually came up and said Thanksgiving is a sad time and for the Native Americans, they are part of the problem.
They're part of our American culture, oppressing the Native Americans.
And instead of teaching that way, they should come up with possibly doing something about it.
They're being the hypocrites of being part of the problem.
I'm trying to figure this out.
You think the people that are like the people that wrote this myth number 11 are actually oppressing Native Americans.
That's right.
They're part of our American culture, oppressing Native Americans.
Well, I don't know that Native Americans are being oppressed.
Well, I don't know.
In the first place, this is another thing where the premise here is all out of whack.
What we have to understand is the objective here.
This is just a flat-out lie, and it is an attempt to poison the minds of young skulls full of mush for the express purpose of getting them to hate their country, to feel guilty about their country.
These multiculturalists are not oppressors.
You can think of oppressors.
They're neo-Stalinists.
I mean, these people are not tolerant of anything.
They're not tolerant of any dissent.
They're trying to take a happy time, turn it miserable.
If it doesn't come from government, it cannot be good.
This is all about tearing down the traditions and institutions that made the country great.
So you could call them oppressors, but they're not interested in helping the Native Americans.
They're not interested in helping anybody.
If you look at the policies people like this come up with, they perpetuate these horrible circumstances that people are in.
Have they solved poverty?
No.
Have they made life?
Do most black people in this country think their lives have gotten better since the Democrats have been running their affairs?
No, you keep voting for them, but they have.
They keep complaining and whining and moaning about the same stuff.
The Democrats don't want these people whose lives are miserable improved because miserable people need government.
They become dependent.
And the more little skulls full of mush that these educators can turn out who resent, dislike, and have great guilt for the country, the greater the odds they're going to grow up that way, become adult liberals and have the same attitudes and fulfill the long-held dream of tearing down the institutions and traditions that have made the country great.
Quick time out.
We'll be right back after this.
Don't go away.
Looky here, folks.
Delta Airlines and United Airlines have begun discussing a combination between the nation's second and third largest carriers that would keep the United name and the corporate headquarters in the Chicago area.
United and Delta are discussing combining.
There is a sense of urgency in the talks.
And listen to this.
There's a sense of urgency in the talks, which have been going on for some time, and they continued as recently as a week or so ago.
An official with knowledge of the talks said Wednesday, the official spoke on condition of anonymity because the person was not authorized to speak publicly.
They want to get something done before a new administration gets in.
And so they get the clock ticking on federal regulatory approval.
Now, did you see the news the other day that Walmart's profits are way up?
Did you hear Hillary Clinton say she wants to take those profits too?
Not yet she hasn't said it, but she has said she wants to take the profits from drug companies and she wants to take the profits from the big oil companies.
Will she take the profits from airline if the companies have, I mean, it's clear to me.
Get this done before a new administration gets in to get the clock ticking on federal regulatory approval so that the odds are to get this done before a new administration.
Why, who could they be afraid of?
Who in the world?
Why?
How can it be that two giant American corporations, great American corporations, Delta and United Airlines, is this a country where corporations, people fear potential changes of power?
Yes, it is when one of the people who might end up there is Mrs. Clinton.
There is no question in my mind that these guys want to get this done before Hillary gets in there and starts jacking around with things.
All right, audio soundbite time.
You got to hear this.
I promised this earlier in the show.
David Rodham Gergen, last night on CNN, says that the question planting for the Clinton, this is like, it's a parking ticket.
It's no big deal.
When a campaign plants a question, that's a pretty minor infraction of the rules, like a parking ticket.
The problem here is that it feeds a perception, a damaging perception of Hillary Clinton, that she can't quite be trusted.
It feeds the suspicion.
But you guys are going to do everything you can to dispel that by calling it a parking ticket.
There is a pattern here.
By the way, this woman of Galochasynov, Muriel Galochazanov, said that she was told by Clinton campaign last week not to talk to any more reporters after the newspaper article in the college paper, but she obviously did anyway.
That's audio soundbite number 11.
It's ABC reporter Et Kate Snow.
Grab that one, Mike, because this is Good Morning America today.
Gala Chasanov says that she was told by the Clinton campaign last week not to talk to any more reporters after that newspaper article in the college paper, but she obviously did anyway.
Told not to talk to reporters, it's just a parking ticket, David Rodham Gergen.
Thank you.
Now back to Bill Schneider, our old buddy at CNN.
Listen to this and see what you think.
When her husband was first elected in 1992, most Americans did not think Bill Clinton was honest and trustworthy, but they voted for him.
He won the election, but he only won with 43% of the vote.
And that was a charge that hung over him for his entire administration.
And she doesn't really want to have to deal with that.
And unfortunately, this feeds into that impression.
But, Bill, you just said honesty didn't matter.
The American people elected him anyway.
Honesty didn't matter.
Trustworthiness.
They didn't think Clinton was either, but they voted for him.
So what's the problem, Bill?
The way these people treat the Clintons.
This is why I think this debate tomorrow night, I think it's going to be, you watch, the odds are that this debate is going to be a home run for her.
It'll be something, something will happen in this debate where they will all be able to say afterwards, because they've had their two weeks of fun with this.
They've had their two weeks of fun of the battleship Hillary bleeding a little oil here.
But it's time to get her, you know, get the leak plugged, so to speak, and right the ship and have it sail on down the ocean there, down the river, whatever.
And they'll do their best to say, oh, she was really on her game last night.
You're really on her game tonight.
Marked contrast from the performance in Philadelphia.
Well, if she screws up, if she screws up and see, she won't have to hit a home run for them to say she did.
But if she does a major, major screw-up, then the excitement will take over for another week and they'll have to report it.
What happened to Mrs. Clinton?
She was set up so well.
Wolf Blitzer was warned.
But everybody's going to be watching tomorrow night.
A lot of people who otherwise wouldn't be watching are going to be watching, hoping for that train wreck.
You watch.
Well, another exciting excursion into broadcast excellence has sadly, ladies and gentlemen, come to a screeching halt and a close.
And we have to take a 21-hour break.
We'll be back tomorrow and do it all over again, revved up and ready to go.
A couple of audio soundbites I wanted to get to today, but didn't.
And I had a Hillary Clinton stack, and I didn't touch it today, other than the driver's license stuff, because I want to give a, you know, going to have this debate tomorrow night.
We don't want to overdo it.
There's going to be plenty of Hillary stuff down the road.
And I got some stuff from the stack today that will work again tomorrow.
It'll be time for it then.
Look forward to it.
See you then, folks.
▲
Export Selection