All Episodes
Previous Next
Oct. 22, 2007 - Rush Limbaugh Program
35:03
October 22, 2007, Monday, Hour #3
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Hey, we're back.
Great to be back.
Rushlin bought a brand new week of broadcast excellence on the EIB network.
Cleaning up the messes of the drive by media and their various hits.
Over the weekend, doing so happily.
800-282-2882 is the number if you'd like to be on the program.
Email address is rush at EIBNet.com.
If case you missed it, in the first hour, Harry Reed in the recording studio over the weekend, ladies and gentlemen, have written the letter.
Mr. Snerdley and I went back to his office during the top of the hour break.
We turned on the uh channel C-SPAN 2, because the Senate opened business at two o'clock.
So they had the guy come out and uh do the prayer to open the Senate, and Dingy Harry took to the floor, which he always does, to uh when the Senate opened session to explain the day's business.
I looked at Sturdly said, I wonder if he'll once again try to horn in on this sturdy.
He said, No, no, no.
He's he's giving me the pushback gestures.
No, no, no.
He's glad this is over, he don't want any more part of this.
I said, we'll see.
We got the sound down.
We'll watch a closed captioning.
And then we see on the closed captioning, last Friday at 1 p.m.
Oh no, I can't believe it.
But he was talking about that was a deadline for some amendments to be offered or some such thing.
We thought he was gonna with that horn in again.
Before we get to the audio sound vice, ladies and gentlemen of the uh Republican debate last night, a story in the UK telegraph that basically says, based on computer model simulations, researchers think that they can spread pulverized car tires through the clouds to affect the path of a hurricane.
Now, supposedly turning a part of the hurricane into a giant solar collector would affect how a whole storm evolves by a tiny bit changing its track.
Now I ran this by our official climatologist here at the EIB network.
That would be Dr. Roy Spencer.
When Dr. Spencer said there are so many pitfalls to this idea, it's hard to know where to start.
First of all, you understand Dr. Spencer is a scientist.
Dr. Spencer says, it's not like we're ever going to be able to give the storm a giant shove to one side.
In order to move a big hurricane, it would probably take many nuclear weapons days before landfall to accomplish something like that.
Instead, the idea partly takes advantage of the butterfly effect, and according to the butterfly effect, everything affects the weather at some point in the future.
A tiny change in one location will supposedly over the course of several weeks dramatically change global weather patterns.
Of course, since there are an almost infinite number of small and large influences going on all the time, the butterfly effect has little practical significance.
Also note that the butterfly effect in this story rush can only be demonstrated with a computer model.
In reality, you cannot change one tiny thing in the atmosphere to see how it affects weather later, because you don't know exactly how weather would have changed without that tiny change.
So it's simply you can only do this on models.
You would never be able to know if what you did worked.
Let's say they got a bunch of granulated car tires and they throw them into a hurricane and all of a sudden changes direction.
How do we know the granulated car tires made it happen?
Because had we not put the pattern uh the uh car tires in there, it might have made the same turn.
We'll never know once we start affecting things like this.
But of course, the computer models are gospel.
Computer models, in fact, are the Bible of global warming, ladies and gentlemen.
Computer models are the scripture of the religion of global warming, and so whatever the models say, we will believe it.
Uh all of this leads to the next problem, and that is that you don't know all of the different big things that are going to happen in, say, the next few days that will alter the hurricane's course anyway.
For example, uh a cluster of storms that happens to form on one side of the hurricane rather than the other side.
You would have to be able to predict the weather in advance for many days in order to know exactly where the storm Was going to go and then try to change its direction slightly days in advance.
This is totally preposterous.
It is foolhardy.
This cannot be the work of genuine scientists coming up with this.
This is so laughable.
All you have to do is look at this year, and I have shared with you my observations.
I'm just a layman when it comes to all of this.
But I have gotten the biggest kick out of looking, okay, they got a little storm out there, and they've been desperate for storms this year, obviously.
So they've been naming the subtropical storms.
That's never happened before.
Then they put all these models out, these tracks, where it's going to go.
And there is likely a quite a bit of divergence in the track, so the Hurricane Senator picked the middle of the various tracks if there's a wide convergence just to be safe.
But nobody knows where they're going to go.
And these haven't developed.
Four of them have developed into hurricanes.
One was a cat one that went into Texas, and I think they fudged that cat one just to be able to call it a hurricane.
Two of them went down there into the uh Yucatan Peninsula area.
Uh I forget where the fourth one went.
We've had nine hurricanes since Hurricane Katrina, and all the global warming people were predicting massive 15 to 20 hurricanes a year after that because of global warming.
Uh it has been laughable to watch the hurricane experts this year desperately try to make every disturbance out in the Caribbean or the Atlantic into a hurricane or a huge tropical storm, and they've all fizzled.
And what's caused them to fizzle this year apparently is wind shear, which wasn't supposed to happen this year because the La Niña El Nino effect was not conducive, but yet there's been a lot of wind shear ripping the tops off the storms.
Before they discovered wind shear, it was Saharan Desert Dust that was uh screwing these.
The bottom line is to come up with computer models like this to suggest throwing a bunch of granulated car tires into a portion of the hurricane is going to cause it to move in a predictable way is simply stupid.
It is simply not possible because you don't know for sure what it's going to do before you drop the granulated car tires.
And by the way, the purpose of the granulated car tires, they're black rubber is supposed to attract solar energy, and that new solar energy introduced into the storm is supposed to have some sort of impact.
But then when do you do it?
Do you wait for two days out?
Do you do it a week out?
When do you do this?
Uh the audacity of people who think that we're on the verge of being able to steer hurricanes.
And it's the same bunch of people, no doubt, who believe in global warming models.
Uh it's just it's it's getting more and more ridiculous with the passing of each day.
We'll be back.
Sit tight.
Hey, newsflash here, folks.
Uh, there are soon to be released more Democrat Party talking points on Al Jazeera.
Al Jazeera has announced that it will soon air another audio tape by Osama bin Laden, with the subject being Iraq, which means more Democrat talking party uh talking points uh are soon to be coming our way via Al Jazeera.
Can you tell folks that I don't really want to play these debate sound bites?
I keep saying I'm gonna get to them, and I I just don't get everything pops up here in the news stack that is the more interesting to me.
Um Snerdley's sending me a note here.
Are you sure Bin Laden's not gonna be talking about phony soldiers?
Would that not be great?
Would that bin Laden reads Media Matters for America too?
Bin Laden with the tape on phony.
Oh no, we couldn't be that lucky.
We just we we couldn't, we couldn't get that lucky.
Lee in St. Louis, uh, welcome to the EIB network.
Hello.
Hello, Rush.
Megadiddoes from St. Louis, Missouri.
How are you doing?
Fine, sir.
Thanks a bunch.
Good.
You just made a quick comment on the uh rubber being uh dropped into the hurricane.
Uh, where are the environmental wackos on this uh to say what uh what would happen to the whales and the porpoises and all that type of thing after they eat it?
Environmental wackos are coming up with this.
Oh, you gotta be kidding me.
No, well, who do you think uses computer models to forecast global warm steer hurricanes?
This is this this is the uh the environmental wacko community coming up with this idea.
If you want to look at it that way, let's say that the granular and by the way, these are these are when you say granulated, that's like sugar.
We're not talking big chunks of tires here.
We're talking gazillions and gazillions and gazillions of tires ground up.
Think of the energy to do that it's going to take.
So you put these granulated.
I'll tell you what it I don't know, you people watch football, but the latest rage and artificial surfaces, uh, field turf is made of granulated automobile tires and other kind of rubber.
And it's uh uh if you watch a game played on that field, that type of field, uh you will see little you could if you're watching in high definition, sometimes you don't need HD if it's a close-up shot.
But I'm sure you've you've you've seen what appear to be little black granules popping up as players drag their feet on the surface.
Gee, what's that?
That's embedded granulated car tires and other kind of rubber in the field.
Uh and so this is what we're talking about.
The energy to granulate all these tires.
So it wouldn't have um wouldn't have profound effect uh on marine or mammal life, but I've just you know, this if the storm hits and this stuff doesn't stir it right, in addition to all the rain, we're gonna get car tires raining down on us in the midst of the uh the hurricane.
Imagine what that would do to our water supply.
All these granulated tires showing up in Lake Okeechobee, for example.
Uh Orlando in Miami, Florida.
Nice to have you, sir on the EIB network.
Hello.
Hello.
Uh good mor good afternoon, Maharashi.
We uh uh we greetings from South Florida.
I'm a legal Cuban emigrant who applied for American citizens the very first date I was able to do that back in 1974.
Congratulations, sir.
I'm a proud American citizen.
This is the best country in the world.
Thank you, sir, very much.
And to prove it is that the whole world wants to come here.
Not many of us want to get out.
Uh I don't know anybody who wants to get there.
The liberals threatened to leave, but they never do.
Yeah, that's what I'm saying.
That's the proof how good we are.
Now, we your students hear you day after day exposed in Denji Harris real estate on ethical deals.
Mrs. Clinton campaigns on ethical campaign fronts much deals too.
And uh unfortunately uh I have seen uh several presidential campaigns here, uh, and I'm afraid that uh uh uh when the real debate become comes real between the real candidates, the Republican candidate will not expose all the things you say, and the left will continue to get away with murder.
Well, I look at I understand this defensive nature that Republicans have.
It's um it still exists in a lot of people's minds that the Democrats are aces, that they are in total control, they get everything done, they never goof up, they never screw up, they never make a mistake, they're gonna outsmart Republicans uh at every turn, and Republicans aren't gonna have the guts to uh call Mrs. Clinton on the uh on the fundraising.
I don't think that's true here.
I think I think uh in the case of Mitt Romney, uh Rudy Giuliani and McCain, especially with given his love for McCain Feingold, and whoever, you know, Fred Thompson, I I think I think uh folks, you we we really have not have not seen the kind of campaign we are going to see next year.
Uh and because of the front-loaded nature of these primaries, we're gonna have our we we we could possibly have the nominees in both parties chosen by February or March.
And it's gonna be a long drawn-out knockout slug fest, and it's gonna be it we can't predict that the the direction the filth will fly, the dirt will go.
Uh but if Rudy's the nominee, make no mistake, they're already hammering it.
This whole debate last night was about Hillary.
I I don't think our guys are are gonna shy away from it at all.
In fact, I think most of our guys in the Republican field want to run against Hillary precisely because of things like this, because it is a gold mine.
It's a golden opportunity.
Uh already got 49 or 50 percent negatives, so I think that this is uh uh something that they're looking at is made to order.
Let's I'm gonna use your call here, Orlando, as a transition into some of these debate sound blights, uh sound bites.
We'll first have Fred Thompson here.
The The question from Chris Wallace.
Senator Thompson.
Have these two guys, uh, meaning Mitt and Rudy convinced you that uh you're wrong and that in fact they are both consistent conservatives.
Actually, Matt, I didn't know there was any room to the left of Ted Kennedy, but maybe they're uh in fact I didn't know there was any room to the right of him either, but maybe uh I was conservative as soon as I put down conscious of a conservative when I was in the college.
Mayor Giuliani uh believes in federal funding for abortion.
He believes in sanctuary cities.
Uh he's for gun control.
Uh he supported Mary Oomo, a liberal Democrat against a Republican who's running for governor, then opposed the governor's uh tax cuts when he was there.
So I simply disagree with him on those issues, and he size with Hillary Clinton on each of those issues I just mentioned.
So uh this was uh this started out.
They actually started debating each other uh as to who is the real conservative, who is more conservative.
Chris Wallace says, Mr. Giuliani, how do you respond?
Fred has his problems too.
I mean, Fred was the single biggest obstacle to tort reform in the United States Senate.
He stood with Democrats over and over again.
He voted against 250,000 caps on damages, which they have in Texas.
He voted against uh almost anything that would make our legal system fairer, uh loser pays rules, things that would prevent lawsuits like that.
$54 million lawsuit by the guy who lost his pants, you know.
Uh so they went after each other on this.
I thought they all were good last night.
I I thought this was a uh a pretty uh interesting debate because they it was it was more like a debate funding.
By the way, newsflash, we're hearing a rumor that the subject matter of Osama bin Laden's new audio tape is in fact the SCHIP program, uh, the state children's health insurance program, uh, and how that money could better be spent from a rock, uh, take it from a rock and spend on that program.
Later on in the debate, Chris Wallace said to Mitt Romney, governor, is Hillary Clinton fit to be commander in chief.
The idea that someone wants to be president who's never worked in the private sector is really a big question mark.
She hasn't run a corner store.
She hasn't run a state, she hasn't run a city.
She has never run anything.
And the idea that she could learn to be president uh, you know, as an internship, just didn't make any sense.
So that this is when the attacks on Hillary then began.
Uh, Chris Wallace said, Governor Romney says Republicans aren't going to beat Hillary Clinton by acting like Hillary Clinton.
Uh, and the point seems to be that on a lot of social issues, like abortion and gay rights and gun control, that there's not much difference between you, uh uh uh Mayor Giuliani and Hillary Clinton.
Is there?
You gotta be kidding.
You have got to be kidding.
Wait a sec.
There is there there are two things I agree with Hillary Clinton on.
First of all, we're both Yankee fans.
Well, wait a second.
I became a Yankee fan growing up in New York.
She became a Yankee fan growing up in Chicago.
Do you believe that?
Uh second, she made a statement last week, and I've been very critical of her.
I want to tell her I agree with this one.
Quote Hillary Clinton.
I have a million ideas.
America cannot afford them all.
I'm not making it up.
I am not making it up.
One more time.
I have a million ideas.
America can't afford them all.
No kidding, Hillary.
America can't afford you.
Yay!
And the applause went on and on and on.
So you see, it was a spirited debate.
Uh, and the focus really was on Mrs. Clinton after they had the debates over who's the real conservative.
But the conclusion that uh that I drew from watching this is that there nobody's afraid of her in this field, and they and they're eager uh to run up against somebody with uh as much baggage as she obviously has.
This fundraising thing, the Republicans are gonna use it when it's time.
Remember, folks, the election's not for a year, a little over a year.
All right, all right, all right, all right.
You cannot talk to me in there when it's time to rejoin the content portion of the program.
I got people demanding internet email answers.
I got people telling me what.
Anyway, welcome back, folks.
Rush Linboy here on the uh on the EIB network.
All right, uh moving on, let's let's get McCain.
Let's be fair.
Uh, on the Republican presidential debate last night.
Many people think this was the line of the night.
Chris Wallace, a moderator, said, Senator McCain, you're running the closest to Clinton, but you still trailer by three points in our latest poll.
The biggest issue between the two of you clearly is a war in Iraq.
You strongly support the troop surge.
She wants to start pulling the troops out.
Is that a winner for Republicans in 2008?
The debate that I have between me and her will be based on national security, on fiscal conservatism, and on social conservatism.
It'll be a respectful debate.
That's what the American people want.
In case you missed it, a few days ago, Senator Clinton tried to spend one million dollars on the Woodstock concert museum.
Now, my friends, I wasn't there.
I'm sure it was a cultural and pharmaceutical event.
I was tied up at the time.
Meaning he was in the Han Oi Hilton is what he means by tied up when Mrs. Clinton now wants to celebrate what was going on at Woodstock.
A lot of people think that was a great line.
And it was.
No question about it.
Um Huckabee, he was probably at his best too last night talking about Hillary.
Uh Chris Wallace said, Governor Huckabee, I'm sorry to say we didn't call the horse race between you and Senator Clinton, but uh, you say that she'll win next November if the Republican Party doesn't do a better job of reaching out to minorities.
There's nothing funny about Hillary Clinton being president.
Let me tell you why.
If she's president, taxes go up, health care becomes the domain of the government, spending goes out of control.
Our military loses its morale, and I'm not sure we'll have the courage and the will and the resolve to fight the greatest threat this country's ever faced in Islamo fascism.
We've got an enemy that wants to kill every last one of us.
We cannot be soft, we must be strong.
We'll sign crazy bills like the Law of the Sea Treaty and give away our sovereignty.
And that's why, with all the fun we're gonna have talking about it, there's nothing funny about Hillary being president.
There you have it.
That's Mike Huckabee talking about Clinton.
You see what I mean?
I mean, the all these guys last night were really on their game.
They were really uh uh they were to the point.
Last night, I'll give you an example.
When I was in Philadelphia on Thursday night the 11th, and I was in a riff on Hillary and the Democrats knowing, I stopped myself in the middle of the riff.
That always grabs the audience's attention.
They may think I lost my place.
Oh no, something wrong.
I stopped.
Of course I never lose my place.
I said, folks, does it frustrate you as much as it does me, that we don't hear this kind of thing, the things that I'm saying about the Democrats and Mrs. Clinton, spoken by Republican presidential candidates?
They stood up and they cheered and so forth.
Well, now all of a sudden, we're starting to get from these candidates the kind of statements that reflect the views of people who are going to vote for them.
One of them who wins the nomination.
Uh you know, read it in the policy wonk stuff.
This was uh this was the best one of the night last night.
And of course, this it's happening on Fox, and the the the you know, Chris Model Wallace did a good moderator job.
He turned these guys into them and into each other.
They were actually debating each other.
It was a debate.
It wasn't a glorified press conference.
This is a network that the Democrats refused to appear on.
Uh I think maybe because they're a little afraid of it, but it's also because they just don't want to validate Fox as a legitimate news organization.
Now, Rudy continue to hit on Iran.
Uh Wendell Gowler, who was uh one of the moderators from Fox News, said Mayor Giuliani, given our experience in Iraq, does the prospect of a nuclear-armed Iraq worry you more than the prospect of going to war with Iran?
Well, there's no question that the idea of going to war with Iran or even taking military action against Iran would be very dangerous.
It would be something you would not want to do.
It would be a last resort.
But if you're asking me the question, which is more dangerous, a nuclear-armed Iran is more dangerous.
And I think our taking a strong position here would be similar to the difference between Ronald Reagan and Jimmy Carter when he was dealing with Iran.
Jimmy Carter had hostages for 444 days.
In one hour, the Iranians released the hostages, and they saw something different in in Ronald Reagan's eyes than in Jimmy Carter's eyes.
The crowd went nuts on that too.
See, people want partisanship.
Our side wants to hear what these people are saying about the Democrats.
Does this not tell you, by the way, the tone of this debate and some of the bites that I played for you?
I made a prediction.
That This presidential election is going to be based and centered not on the war in Iraq, per se, as the as the theme or the number one issue.
It's going to be about the future of the country and where people like Hillary will take it and where people like guys on our side will take it.
That's going to be the fundamental debate.
That's going to be the fundamental thing that this presidential campaign is about.
So on CBS, on the early show today on CBS, the co-host Hannah Storm talked with CBS Face the Nation host Bob Schiefer.
And she said, So, Bob, who won the I am the most conservative prize last night at the with derision and so forth and so forth.
Who won the I am the most conservative prize last night at the debate?
Well, it was a contest as they all tried to accuse each other of who was the most like Hillary Clinton.
You know, I was thinking about this, Hannah.
Herbert Hoover, the Republican president, presided over the Great Depression.
Franklin Roosevelt started running against Herbert Hoover in 1932, and three decades later, Democrats were still running against Herbert Hoover.
I think for the Republicans, Hillary Clinton has become the new Herbert Hoover.
As you saw last night, they all want to run against Hillary Clinton.
They accused each other of being alike Hillary Clinton.
I came away from this debate wondering what would they do without her.
You know, that is just stunning.
Because Bob, I'm gonna tell you something.
Half the Democrats in this country are gonna go vote for president in November next year and are gonna be shocked when they see that George Bush's name is not on the ballot.
Who the hell are you Democrats that you are so in love with running against?
And who have they been running?
They're still running against Bush, he's not even on the ballot.
Herbert Hoover was on the ballot.
These guys are not on the ballot.
Bush isn't.
Um they just can't stand it when people attack Hillary.
He just can't stand it, folks.
Just can't stand it.
So they got to mock Republicans, make fun of them and all that.
Back to the phones quickly.
Ron in Portland, Oregon.
Thank you for waiting, sir.
You're on the EIB network.
Hello.
Right.
Yeah.
Thank you for taking my call.
Listen, uh, John McCain is too old, he talks too slow, and he's too friendly with Hillary.
He said last night he respected Hillary.
He's gonna have a respectable debate with Hillary.
We don't want that.
The country doesn't want that.
Here's the gal that's taking money from Chinese dishwashers that uh John McCain was supposed to fix, and he respects her.
Remember, John McCain was going was was considered by John Kerry to be his running mate.
Anyone that that close to those guys is no friend of mine.
Well, you know, I noticed it did caught my ears when McCain said he was gonna have a debate with Hillary, a spirited debate, but it'll be a respectful debate.
That's what the American people want.
You know that what that is?
Um, that's just Senate speak.
My good friend Harry Reid, my wonderful colleague Daniel Akaka.
That's all this decorum that exists in the Senate and so forth by rule.
You'll note that well, you know who the last senator elected president was in this country?
Take him.
Well, yes, it was John F. Kennedy, right, in 1960.
It's the last time a U.S. Senator has been elected president here.
Uh and and it's because these guys don't delegate, they in charge of everything.
Their egos are out of control, and that means they can't delegate to their staffs very well.
Their staff start screwing things up.
You know, Hillary's pretty good at delegating because she's had the war room all along, but she's intimately involved in it as well.
But these th this this uh respectful debate and so forth is uh that that's simply Senate speak.
And it's not I don't know whether the American people want a disrespectful debate, but they don't want phony nice.
That that's a that's a myth.
The American people are sick of partisanship.
The American people want to return to civility.
All that is, folks, it's liberal jive.
And what it means is we gotta shut Republicans and conservatives up.
We just have to shut them up.
Because they, in their estimation, are impossible to cr to uh impossible.
Uh it is impossible for them to participate in or create or be responsible for Any lack of civility or any partisanship.
It's not possible so it's got to be all Republicans.
So when you hear people talk like this, it just means Republicans have shut up.
And so when McCain says it'll be a civil debate and respectful debate, Republicans cringe over that because they know that Hillary ain't gonna be polite.
She might be polite on stage.
She might be polite when they have debates, but the campaign's not going to be polite.
Nothing about it's going to be polite.
Most campaigns aren't.
Learn it, love it, live it.
Get used to it.
What do they are?
You know, folks, one day we are going to wake up, and we are going to have a real severe domestic energy shortage.
One day we're going to wake up and we're not going to have any energy.
Get this.
Nuclear power uh uh uh on Thursday read the wrong piece of paper.
On Thursday, for the first time in American history, a state, in this case Kansas, denied an electricity producer a construction license for a coal-fired power plant due to man-made global warming fears.
It was reported by the New York Times on Saturday.
The Kansas Department of Health and Environment on Thursday turned down a permit for twin 700 megawatt coal-fired generators that a group of electric cooperatives is seeking to build near Holcomb in Southwest Kansas.
The ownership and electricity would be shared by 67 cooperatives in Kansas and neighboring states.
Roderick Bremby, Secretary of the Department of Health and Environment in Kansas, said in a statement, I believe it would be irresponsible to ignore emerging information about a the contribution of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases to climate change and the potential harm to our environment and health if we do nothing.
Washington Post reported on this Friday, and they said the decision marks a victory for environmentalist Waco Group.
Well, they didn't publish WACO, I threw it in there, that are fighting proposals for new coal-fired plants around the country.
Maybe the first of a series of similar state actions inspired by a Supreme Court decision in April that asserted that greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide should be considered pollutants under the Clean Air Act.
That's just outrageous.
It is just absurd.
Well, the Chinese are going to continue to build coal-fired plants.
They won't let us use nuclear.
They won't let us drill for oil.
Now they're shutting down.
This is the first of a trend.
The the the uh construction of new coal-fired plants.
Coal is our most abundant energy resource.
We got tons of it.
And they're going to try to shut this down.
We are going to be in heap big trouble, folks.
We're going to be in deep doo doo if this trend spreads.
And with the Supreme Court granting the EPA the right to treat this stuff as pollutants and so forth.
Now the court system is involved in energy creation in uh in our country.
And of course, it's all based on a total hoax.
It's like the alternative universe.
This guy at this Kansas department knows only one thing in global warming.
He hasn't tried to find out if Gore's movie's chock full of lies, if the science behind it is not a consensus and is also fraudulent.
It's like the same people who refuse to see the truth about the dingy Harry Smear letter he wrote to me.
think that whatever media matters said I said, that I said.
That's so many damn closed-minded people on the left and they still, they profess to be the open-minded among us.
They see the gray, they see the nuance.
These people the most closed-minded uh shut away from reality I have ever encountered uh among the sane.
And that's saying something.
They're literal shut ins.
They are shut in away from reality by design on purpose, so they don't have to have a little cozy world turned upside down by evidence that conflicts with the falsehoods they tell themselves in order to feel good every day.
Mike in Montgomery, Alabama, thank you for calling, sir.
Welcome to the EIB network.
Megadiddoes from Shopton, Alabama.
Thank you.
If we get the cloud feeding with ground up tires, we can have the court system involved because the Democratic trial lawyers will love suing all the tire manufacturers, the airplane manufacturers, and everybody else that has something to do with it because the hurricane will eventually hit somebody somewhere.
That's right.
The idea that we're almost always gonna be able to steer them out to sea.
Uh it they're gonna hit yeah, that's a good point.
That is uh that's it.
You know, I I don't do this enough.
I never do examine the role of the uh plaintiff's bar uh in all of these proposed the trial lawyers.
The aggrieved the injured the I'm sorry, the healthy who are aggrieved and injured, uh as stated in court.
I just I never never do factor that in.
It is always a uh relevant uh aspect to any of these type stories.
Uh Reno, Nevada, this is Dale, your next.
Welcome, sir.
Nice to have you here.
Thank you, Rush.
I appreciate the time to speak with you.
You bet.
Uh uh Rush, I wanted to speak with you, but I totally agree with the fact that uh under the liable and and slander laws that you don't have a case because you are a public figure.
Exactly right.
However, I think if you can answer five questions, uh three maybe four questions, in the affirmative, you may have another action.
First of all, was there a public official involved in this?
And the answer is yes.
Yep.
Secondly, was there more than one public official?
The answer is yes.
Yes.
Were they answering uh or acting officially during your regular work day?
The answer again is yes.
Yes.
Do they have the power to affect the rules, regulations, and laws concerning your industry?
The answer again is yes.
Yes.
The third thing is is did they then try to contact an individual who's part of your marketing program to affect your ability to make a living?
Uh yes.
Under those three circumstances, I think what you have as public officials acting under the color of law to deprive you of your civil rights.
Uh now, you know, this is interesting because I have had this gone any further, uh, that was the angle I was going to take it, because if they interact with my contractual agreements that I have made with people and prohibit me from fulfilling them, they have stopped and interceded in my ability to do business, and as such they have harmed me and the people I do business with.
And that that would be you're absolutely right.
That would be the direction to go.
Not slander, not libel, not any of that stuff.
Well, the uh the other half of that, the nice thing about it is is that you report that to the FBI who hands it off to their civil rights people, the ones that go after the policeman for beating folks.
And if they don't do it, then you can go for a rid of mandamus to make them constitute.
Well I like the rid of man Davis, too.
Uh but it's interesting.
I look at folks.
I I pr uh uh Harv, I I appreciate you uh or or Dale, I'm sorry, I appreciate your calling on this.
But there's certain things here, you've wetted people's whistle, but there's certain things we gotta keep close to the vest.
In terms of strategery, you get what I'm saying.
Uh absolutely.
One other thing that might be considered along this line.
Right, well, let's go ahead and blow the strategy.
Go all the way.
Go ahead.
What's the other thing?
All right.
The other thing that might be considered along this was the uh ostensible uh uh media information provider was ostensibly set up by an individual that's a signatory to that letter.
Which now includes uh uh media as well as the I don't want to go any further.
I don't want to go any further.
You're giving away the secret here, and I got a break anyway.
We gotta go.
Not enough time here to say anything other than I gotta go.
Leaving for New York.
Super secret dinner this afternoon or tonight, actually, be doing the program from high atop the EIB building in down Manhattan tomorrow.
You didn't know that, certainly?
▲
Export Selection