All Episodes
Previous Next
Oct. 16, 2007 - Rush Limbaugh Program
35:28
October 16, 2007, Tuesday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Testing, testing, testing.
Just conducting a little inside broadcasting test here to see if I detect any compression on the microphone line.
There is a little.
There is a little.
It just doesn't seem to be quite as much, but it's not worth monkeying around because then you'll break it totally.
Greetings and welcome back.
Rush Limbaugh here at the EIB building, high atop the EIB building in Midtown Manhattan.
As usual, America's real anchorman, America's truth detector, and the doctor of democracy, all combined as one harmless, lovable little fuzzball.
Looking forward to talking to you today as they are talking to you today as the program unfolds.
The telephone number is 800-282-2882.
The email address is rush at EIBnet.com.
I made a little error in the first hour.
I call them the Graham family, this S-CHIP family.
It's the Frost family, and the kid, first name is Graham.
And I wanted to correct the error when it was pointed out to me.
I said, who it doesn't matter what their name is.
Yes, it is Rush because they're already being abused by the Democrats.
Now you're abusing them by getting their name wrong.
I said, it's a good point.
Did Mikulski call him Graham?
Well, then that's why I did.
No wonder I was following.
Here, play that.
You guys, you have to hear this, this soundbite from the previous hour.
Barbara Mikulski on the Senate floor.
This was late yesterday afternoon.
This tone of vitriolic viciousness, I think, has got to stop.
The attack on the Graham family was quickly picked up by Rush Limbaugh, the same guy who's calling dissident military people microphone Marines.
And then the smear went on with them.
We're still trying to figure out what microphone Marines are.
I've never used the term.
It doesn't make any sense to me.
She can't get the family's name right.
She can't get the smear right.
You know, I mentioned right before the previous hour, a lot of people, you in the audience, are sending letters to these senators that signed the smear letter written by Harry Reid, including people are sending letters to Harry Reid.
And they've got, Senate has form letters they're sending back.
Thanks so much for getting a hold of us.
We appreciate it.
But then they repeat the smear.
They repeat the smear.
Limbaugh went on and on and on, besmirching the honor of military people who've served but disagree with the policy.
It is Kafka-esque.
Now, I don't expect them to apologize, but I would expect them to just sort of slowly fade away on this and drop it and move on to something else.
But they are continuing the smear, and these form letters are going out to people who know the truth.
It is, it just is mind-boggling here, even though they now know the truth.
See, I think they knew the truth from the get-go.
I think this is all a programmed smear designed, as I said to the Fox News channel guys this morning.
This is designed to affect credibility among people who don't listen to the program and to try to shake some of your faith, those of you who do listen to the program.
But see, they can't.
I asked Harry Reid, I said, come up, be a man.
Come to my studio.
Come on my radio program and say this stuff to my face.
Call me unpatriotic to my face.
You won't do that.
None of the libs would come on and debate the issues.
All they want to do is debate me and come up with all of this stuff.
And it's the same, not just with me, but with a lot of other people.
And so they can't flourish in an atmosphere where they do not have or a circumstance where they don't have a monopoly.
And since they can't win in the arena of ideas.
Have you noticed, for example, let's look at the Republican presidential primary.
Fred Thompson was in New York last night and he went out and he attacked Rudy Giuliani.
What Thompson says, I am the real conservative in this race.
And he went on to point out some things that Giuliani has done that are not conservative, like endorsing Mario Kumo for governor in 1994.
Here's a little passage from what Thompson said last night.
He spoke to the Conservative Club of New York.
He said, some think the way to beat the Democrats in November is to be more like them.
I couldn't disagree more.
I believe that conservatives beat liberals only when we challenge their outdated positions, not embrace them.
This is not a time for philosophical flexibility.
It's a time to stand up for what we believe in.
I spent eight years in Washington fighting for smaller government, lower taxes, less regulation, and conservative judges.
With me, what you see is what you get.
I was a proud conservative yesterday.
I remain one today, and I will be one tomorrow.
Together, we can carry the conservative banner all the way to the White House, and I'm asking for your help.
That's Fred Thompson here in New York last night.
He didn't mention any names, but he's obviously taking shots at Rudy, because what Rudy's running around doing is saying, hey, you know what?
I can win Massachusetts, and I can win Pennsylvania, and I might be able to win New York.
And when conservatives hear this, they say, oh, if you say you're going to win those states, how are you going to do it?
By out-liberaling the Democrat candidate or by appealing?
And what Rudy says is no.
No, I have groups of people that I can appeal to because they know who I am.
And he thinks he'll run well with blacks.
He thinks he'll run well with the Jewish population, Jewish voters.
He thinks he'll run well with people that are liberal but are interested in security.
And what I would suggest to Rudy is, don't say you can win in these states.
Say you can win the country.
I mean, Reagan did not say, well, I'm going to go out and win these particular states.
He just, he said, I'm going to be president of the country.
The people of the country believe in my policies and principles and so forth.
But anyway, the point I wanted to make about this is, not to get into campaign advice, but the Republicans are having arguments now about who they are, and they're being very honest.
I'm more conservative than he is.
I'm the real conservative.
McCain said, no, I'm the conservative.
Shut up.
And then you've got Romney saying, oh, I'm the conservative.
I've done this.
Meanwhile, over on the Democrat side, can you tell me one of them who's running, I'm the real liberal here?
None of them.
None of them.
They're all trying to cover it up.
They're all trying to mask it.
They're not even talking about their ideology or any of that.
They are suggesting that different policy planks, they're just buying votes and they're appealing to people's emotions.
We have a real issue debate on ours.
And the point of all this is, is you have people like Harry Reid and all the Democrats that signed this letter and the Media Matters people, they will not engage at all on policy or on ideas because they can't be honest about who they are in those debates.
They can't be honest about how much they want to raise your taxes.
They can't be honest about how they really want to lose the war in Iraq.
They can't be honest with you about how unseriously they take the whole war on terror.
They can't be honest about this.
And so they have to besmirch and criticize, impugn the integrity and the reputation of those that they find to be their opponents or their opposition.
And that's all this smear letter is.
And it's not the first time that they've tried it with me.
And it won't be the last, obviously.
They're running against me right now because the Republicans haven't chosen a nominee.
The reason they're running against me is because I connect with people who think in, we engage and we think about issues.
We come to conclusions.
We're not mind-numbed robots.
We cannot and do not want to be made victims so that we become wards of the state.
And so that's what this smear is about.
They're continuing the smear in the letters of response they are sending to constituents and citizens who complain about it.
It is historic.
It is a massive abuse of power.
The First Amendment, free speech, says Congress shall make no law abridging free speech.
I already have with McCain Feingold.
The United States Congress is supposed to protect innocent citizens by protecting and defending the Constitution.
These guys are shredding it and trying to get my corporate partner in the syndication side of the program to condemn me, to make me apologize.
And this is an effort to harm my ability to do business.
And it's backfired on them big time.
We're at $51,100 on the eBay auction.
It'll go through Friday at 1 o'clock, and it's going to really start percolating here toward the end of the week.
Because you know the big money is holding out so as not to bid this up, but it'll get fast and furious.
All the money goes to the Marine Corps Law Enforcement Foundation.
I'm going to match whatever the final donation is with a donation of myself or my own to the Marine Corps Law Enforcement Foundation.
And I have requested, suggested that Senator Reed and the other 40 senators who signed the letter also match to show their support.
I don't think that will happen, but it's a nice thing to suggest and to ask.
So you can go to the eBay page.
We've got a link to it right up.
We've got a little widget there, in fact, on our homepage at rushlimbaugh.com, which gives you the running total, a number of bids.
Plus, you can go to the eBay page and see the whole thing.
So it's going to be up and running.
We're having tremendous success and lots of fun with it at the same time while enmeshed in what is an historic occurrence.
Whoever ends up with this letter is going to have an historic document.
As we say in our description on the eBay page, this may be the greatest example in modern history of the United States Senate or 41 members of it trying to shut down the free speech of a private citizen who's not running for any office, who's not elected to anything.
It's something, folks, I'm proud to be at the center of.
I truly am.
And whoever ends up with this letter is going to have a true Smithsonian style type document from our government.
Quick timeouts.
Back after this with much more.
Ha, welcome back.
We found an explanation here for Barbara Mikulski, Senator from Maryland, using the term microphone Marines, but in typical Senate Democrat fashion, she got it wrong.
They are making history on the Democrat side in the Senate of getting it wrong.
Here again is Mikulski late yesterday afternoon on the Senate floor.
This tone of vitriolic viciousness, I think, has got to stop.
The attack on the Graham family was quickly picked up by Rush Limbaugh, the same guy who's calling dissident military people microphone Marines.
And then the smear went on with that.
All right, so we couldn't figure this out.
Microphone Marines never used the phrase.
Certainly never used the phrase to describe dissident what?
Dissident military people.
Well, we did a little research here, and there's a column from October 10th.
What is this?
This is the 16th.
So this is six days ago in the Baltimore Sun by Thomas Schaller entitled Microphone Marines.
And these microphone Marines, I'm reading now from his piece, the microphone Marines, such as Mr. Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, and Coulter have convinced themselves that their outrage-filled rants, disinformation campaigns, and challenges to others' patriotism constitute national service.
So this schlub is calling me a microphone Marine.
That's just a new updated term, I guess, for chicken hawk.
Mikulski couldn't even get that right.
She thinks that I was calling dissident military people microphone Marines.
Anyway, so here the smear continues with this.
How does this idiot keep a job?
This guy is a columnist of the Baltimore Sun, and he's dead wrong.
And I guess it doesn't matter.
Convince themselves that their outrage-filled rants, disinformation campaigns, and challenges to others' patriots.
I'm the one that was called unpatriotic.
Idiot.
I'm laughing, folks.
I'm not mad.
Don't do it.
This is parallel universe time like it's never been.
The other side does not want to get it right.
This is a great illustration, folks, of what they use the media monopoly for.
They have their narratives.
They have their templates.
The truth is the most inconvenient thing to them.
Fiction is what they need to survive.
And in order to sell and peddle fiction, you need a monopoly.
And they don't have their monopoly anymore, but they're still peddling their fiction.
And they don't understand how it is destroying them and discrediting them.
And for that, ladies and gentlemen, I celebrate.
And I say I'm happy because it's succeeding.
Let's go to Fort Lauderdale, Florida.
This is Jim.
Nice to have you on the EIB network, sir.
Hello.
Hi, Rush.
Great to talk to you.
Thank you.
This is such a fabulous idea of yours, and it will be my privilege to make a contribution to it.
But, you know, I got to thinking, what if George Soros donates $20 or $30 million?
You've got to match that.
No problem.
Well, okay.
But it's not going to happen.
But I, you know, I wouldn't put it on the.
It's not going to get that high.
Soros is not going to send $20 or $30 million to the Marine Corps Law Enforcement Foundation.
Hey, you don't know what they do to get at you.
Look at what they've done in the Senate.
How would that be getting at me?
Well, to get Rush in the position of saying he didn't match that donation.
Which I, that's a problem.
I see where you're going.
I see where you're going.
So you think I should put a limit on it?
Yeah, maybe.
You know, it's interesting to get what people think.
I have, you know, we're on the lookout.
We know full well.
We suspect.
Rush, you're too big.
We suspect.
They don't mind spending that kind of money, especially Soros and Schlickmeisters and all these other guys.
I would hate to see that happen.
Do you really think they would spend $20 to $30 million on this just to get me in an inability to match?
Well, look at what's happening in the last couple of months.
If they're going to spend that kind of money, it's because they want the letter back.
But, you know, the 20 million, 30 million, you know, a book, a couple speeches, it's not a biggie.
Not a big deal.
Don't worry about it.
Don't worry about it.
I appreciate the concern.
I really.
It's just a thought crossed my mind.
And keep up the great work you do, Rush.
We love you.
Thank you so much.
I appreciate that.
This is Sunana from Encinitas, California.
Hi, Sunana.
Hi, Rush.
I had a great idea for you.
Yeah.
I think that once you match the donation, you should get a certified copy of the receipt and put it on your website and then challenge the Clinton campaign to post the certified receipt of the 80,000 at Norman Shu money that they were going to give to charity.
You know, that is an excellent point because nobody demands that they follow up on this.
All these campaigns, in fact, some of the campaigns are now saying, we're not going to give it back.
We're going to keep it.
It was given in good faith.
Who cares?
But some of them have said, yeah, we're going to give the money back to charity, but nobody ever demands proof that it went to charity.
Exactly.
Not a bad idea.
The ideas are limitless here, and we've got any number of suggestions that are pouring in on how to make this bigger.
We don't want to lose focus here on what this is actually all about, though, in the process.
Glenn in Fort Myers, Florida.
Hello, sir.
Rush, it's an honor.
Wow, great.
Well, you know, I think the Libs tried to counter with their Air America thing, and that fell on its face.
So now they've got to do something to kind of get you out of the way.
And that's what this whole dem thing from the floor is all about.
Just another one of their ways to try to get rid of Rush Limbaugh.
Well, it's that, but it's not unique.
This is not the first.
Well, it's the first time the Senate.
Well, actually, it's not the first time.
Tom Harkin has said some pretty derogatory things in the debate over my program being on armed forces radio.
But this is probably the first time such Senate action has taken place.
Look, I know they're frustrated that little Air America hasn't amounted to anything, and it won't.
They're frustrated that none of their liberal hosts have been able to crack the market even with decent funding.
They just haven't the slightest clue about the private sector.
They don't have the slightest clue about radio.
Look, this continues to make the point, folks.
If they don't have a monopoly, they can't thrive.
They cannot flourish if they don't have a monopoly.
And I'm sorry to be repetitive here, but this effort here targeting me, believe me, is just the first of many, and it's designed to discredit me and to try to damage my reputation.
But more importantly, what this is really all about is an effort to make it impossible for me to do business.
And without the business side of this, all the rest of it is academic.
But beyond that, you know, I hear all of you, and I read your emails, and you say, boy, they're really coming after you this time, Rush.
I hope you're taking care of yourself.
Folks, understand what this is.
I'm speaking to you here as one who loves the country and one who loves the Constitution.
Forget that it's me for a second.
And forget this notion that, oh, worry about Rush.
Rush can take care of himself.
Everybody says that.
It's true.
Stop and think what this is.
The United States Senate, 41 members sign a letter literally trying to deny me free speech via pressure on my syndication partner here in the radio show.
A private citizen.
The Constitution exists to protect citizens from the government in this way.
They've really, really crossed the line here.
You know it, and I know it.
In service to humanity, all mankind and animal kind as well.
Defender of motherhood, supporter of fatherhood, in some cases, general all-round good guy from high atop the EIB building in midtown Manhattan.
Have you ever, to try to put this in perspective before I move on here, condemning private citizens, United States government, United States Senate condemning private citizens?
Do you think it ever occurred to the 41 Democrats who signed the Harry Reid letter to condemn the actions of, say, Sean Penn or Danny Glover or Kevin Spacey or any of the other Hollywood elite who travel to the foreign lands of our enemies, such as Iran, such as Iraq, such as Venezuela, such as Cuba, and come back, give aid and comfort to these tyrant dictators?
Would it ever occur?
Of course not.
Of course not, because the American left is sympathetic to those people.
They're just poor little communists.
We made them that way, stealing all their resources, robbing them of their health care and so forth.
Which really helps put this into focus as well.
The Democrats in the Congress and the Senate still playing to the fringe lunatics in their base, still raising money for the primaries.
Literally, this was a fundraising effort, too, in addition to everything else that it is.
And it was an attempt to deflect the whole negative blow-up that was the General Betraeus ad in the New York Times prior to General Petraeus' testimony back to Hillary Clinton.
We had time before all this came up again to talk about Mrs. Clinton and how she had made a statement that, yes, she would use military action against Iran, not to stop them from going nuclear, not to stop them from targeting and attacking Israel, not to get rid of their regime.
No, she would.
She said in South Carolina, and the drive-by zipped ellipse, local AP reported it, didn't get much beyond that.
She said that she would go to war with Iran to maintain the free flow of oil at market prices, blood for oil.
She told an audience in South Carolina, guess who the audience in South Carolina is, even among Democrats, there's some conservatives there, all conservative Republicans, no blood for oil, big Democrat theme.
We're not going to waste American treasure and wife for oil.
Yuck, it's not worth it.
Mrs. Clinton knows better and says that's where she would consider using military action against Iran.
Now, this is from a far-left fringe lunatic blog called The Fire Dog Lake, and it's from yesterday.
Every year, I go to a fundraiser luncheon sponsored by a group called the Eleanor Roosevelt's Legacy Committee.
It's a group that raises money, recruits and trains Democrat women candidates, and give campaign grants to those running in New York.
Hillary Clinton has been a patron of this organization from the beginning and is often the keynote speaker.
As you can imagine, the lunch this year was Hill chilling with her thoughts.
What I do know is that I heard her say that she would end the Iraq war immediately upon taking office.
This two days ago or a day ago.
Lots of heads snapped up when she said that, and there was plenty of applause, even a little whooping.
And the very politically plugged in person sitting next to me remarked that the statement was completely new.
It is completely new.
Mrs. Clinton said to this Eleanor Roosevelt Legacy Committee, she will bring the troops home.
She will end the Iraq war immediately upon taking office.
Now, this is a total variance of what she said in the last Democrat debate in which she said, well, I can't make that determination right now, Tim, or whoever was asking the question, I can't make that determination because I don't know what I'm going to find there.
We don't know what the circumstances are going to be.
We don't know if al-Qaeda is going to come back and we don't know if the civil war is going to be going.
I can't commit.
I don't think we'll have all the troops out of there by 2013.
Now, there is no candidate in the history of the presidency who gets away with such prevarications.
I can't, maybe Bill Clinton, but she's all over the place.
Now, admittedly, this is on a blog, and this took place again in New York at the Eleanor Roosevelt Legacy Committee.
But I know Hillary's a presidential candidate, and she's got a press corps running around following her where she goes.
And they had to have heard this.
And if they're not with her on this, why not?
Anyway, all of this stuff is every depends on the, I guess it's hour by hour and audience by audience what her position on key fundamental issues to Democrats happens to be.
Hour to hour, day-to-day, audience to audience.
This is totally at odds with what she said on a nationally televised, even though hardly anybody watched it, debate.
I haven't heard this anywhere outside this blog.
Then we've got this in the Washington Times.
Senator Hillary Rodney Clinton will develop a plan to withdraw troops from Iraq within 60 days of becoming president, but will order specialized units to stay behind to fight terrorists there and elsewhere in the region, she wrote in a detailed Foreign Affairs Magazine essay.
So let's put these together.
She said, here's what she wrote.
If, if elected, she would begin bringing troops home within the first two months, redirect U.S. financial aid to help Iraqi citizens, not propping up the Iraqi government, for God's sakes, for crying out loud.
Now she wants the Iraqi citizens to become wards of the United States government.
She won't prop up the duly elected Iraqi government.
She'll take the money we're spending on the troops and give it to the Iraqis.
Yes, health care for all.
She would replace military force in Iraq with intensive diplomatic initiative in the region.
She also said she would order specialized units to engage in targeted anti-terrorism operations in Iraq and against other terrorist organizations in the region.
Campaign did not respond to an inquiry from the Washington Times asking for a definition of other organizations.
She did vote to finger the Revolutionary Guards, though.
Remember, in Iran, she did vote.
That got her some trouble in the Democrat primary base because that was reported nationally.
Mrs. Clinton said that rebuilding the military will be a key priority and promised to expand and modernize forces so they're better prepared to meet threats.
Okay, so where do we go?
From the last debate, well, I can't commit, Tim, to anything regarding troop reductions in Iraq.
I mean, I don't know what I'm going to find.
Bush's administration might be holding things back on us.
I don't think we'll be out of there by the end of my first term because that was his question.
Do you think you'll be out by the end of your first term?
No, no, no.
And no other Democrat candidate, other than Kucinich, said anything different.
Edwards said he couldn't commit to getting everybody out by 2013, and so did Hillary Obama said the same thing.
Now, Hillary goes to the Eleanor Roosevelt bunch, says, well, I got him to get him out of there immediately.
That war is going to be over the minute I'm president.
Now she's telling in Foreign Affairs magazine, 60 days.
And then she's going to start withdrawing people.
Now, folks, honestly, this is not presidential.
Some people, Rush, this is brilliant.
This is really smart, Rush, because she knows that she's not going to get called on it.
And so she's telling these audiences what it is they want to hear.
So it really is, folks, this is the kind of thing it's going to come back to haunt her.
And I know when, because there's going to be a Republican nominee someday, and there's going to be television ads, and all these things are going to be, if I can discover them, a whole bunch of Operation Research people can.
And she's going to be asked about this by a Republican, by a candidate in a debate somewhere.
And she's just, her only retort is going to be, here they go again, distorting, trying to gin up the negative.
And that's what she always says.
She gives the cack of ha, ha, and then goes into this business about how it's just too bad that all these campaigns have degenerated into all this negativity.
And she will not answer these things.
And she's going to get called on this.
This is not smart.
And it's, in addition to not being smart, it's quite illustrative of the fact that this woman will say anything to any audience to get where she wants.
She does not want to have to get there being honest with people because she doesn't want to have to be tied to what she has said.
And actually, it's more than that.
She knows she won't get where she wants if she is totally honest.
Like this new health care plan of hers is 10 pages, and I'm going to let the Congress fill in the blanks.
Ha!
The last health care plan was 1,200 pages, and she knows what happened to it.
There's a great piece today in the American Spectator on their website by Jeffrey Lord, who talks about the hypothetical of Mrs. Clinton winning and what her first few days as president might be like.
I'll share that with you as the program unfolds.
Lots of other things too.
And your phone calls around the corner in a jiffy.
All right, audio sound by time.
Mrs. Clinton, this was actually Sunday on TV1, one-on-one.
Hillary Clinton spoke.
Here's a portion of her remarks about African American voters.
I want African Americans to feel that when I'm president, it's another Clinton presidency, and we're going to be doing everything we can to get this country to be on the side of them and people who are working hard and struggling so that they can have a better chance.
It's already happening, Hillary.
The economy is going through the roof.
More people working than ever before.
Wages are up.
Chances to do well in this country have never been better, except for your constituents who you've continually talked into a constant mood of pessimism and defeatism.
If I were black voters, if I were a black voter, I would say, you had eight years to get people to love us.
You had eight years, Mrs. Clinton, to what to be on our side.
In fact, you Democrats have had 50 years to get people on our side.
And yet we're still complaining about the same things you said you're going to fix.
And we're still poor.
And 70% of our kids still only have one parent in the house.
And our schools still suck.
And you run them.
And I'm through voting for you.
This is what I would say if I were a black voter.
And here's more promises of, well, you know, the Republicans, this has devastated you.
All this racism out there.
The Don Amoses are what you elect us and we'll deal with them.
We're going to leave you right where you are, mired in misery and obscurity.
But we'll deal with these other people.
And we'll really get them for you.
Yeah, yep, yep, yep, yep, yeah.
Here's Donna Brazil.
Last night on a situation room with Wolf Blitzer talked with Brazil.
Blitzer says, as you know, Bill Clinton, her husband, is very well liked by the African-American community.
He was commonly referred to as the nation's first black president.
Maybe she'll be the first sister-in-chief.
We'll see.
She's a sister.
She knows the issues.
She can communicate them well.
She's a fighter.
As my angel would say, she's a phenomenal woman.
Okay.
Here is Mrs. Clinton as a sister.
I don't feel no ways tired.
I come too far from where I started from.
Nobody told me that the road would be easy.
I don't believe he brought me this far to leave me.
Oh, she can sit there and insult them.
She can make fun of and mock them.
She can tell them that the reason that they're in a mess is because of Republicans.
And she can say, give me eight more years and we'll make it fair for you out there.
Well, get even with these people.
It is literally, I mean, this is not about racism, it's about liberalism.
It's about blacks.
It's about socialism.
It's not about race.
It's about keeping a voting block and doing nothing for them.
And that's, by the way, that's liberals with everybody.
The last thing they want to do is actually have you do well enough to move out of your obscurity and not need them.
This is hideous stuff, folks.
They want the whole country to look more like minority communities in terms of their economic circumstances than it does at present.
That's what they want.
They want need.
They want desperation.
And they want to make sure that they and their government are the only place the desperate can tune or turn to.
She's even recruited Maya Angelou.
She did the poem at Clinton's inauguration at Washington 19th, The River, the Rock and the Tree.
I will never forget the river, the rock, and de tree for Maya Angelou.
Maya Angelou has now done an ad for Sister Hillary.
And here's the audio.
Hello, everybody.
I am Maya Angelou, and I'm here.
I'd love to be there with you, Paul.
I'm there with you in spirit.
I am here to talk about Mrs. Hillary Rodham Clinton.
I know her as a woman.
Really?
She makes me very proud.
I'm proud that she gives herself the authority to be in her own skin.
What?
To be who she is.
Each one, teach one, we say.
Well, each time a woman stands up for herself, without knowing it possibly, without claiming it, she stands up for all women.
There you go, babes.
You are nothing but victims.
You're helpless.
And you're part of a giant monolith.
And so when Mrs. Clinton's sister Hillary stands up for you, or for herself, she's standing up for you and all women.
If you believe that, I got some Mikoto pearls for you.
Or Mikimoto pearls, whatever they are.
You think Hillary Clinton's thinking about you when she stands up for herself?
When she stands up for herself, she's damn well going to make sure you stay on the floor.
We'll be back after this.
All right, folks, we are back.
Let me grab a quick phone call here.
Bill in Appleton, Wisconsin.
I'm glad you called, sir.
This is where visiting teams stay when they go play the Packers at Lambeau Field.
Hello, sir.
That's right.
I've been listening to you ever since you were in Sacramento, and then you went national.
Thank you.
And I missed talking to Pop or having you talk to Pop, you know.
And what I was on the call about, first I want to plug in and say hi to all my friends at Mercer Transportation out of Louisville, Kentucky.
Oh, very good.
You know, I should tell we got about 45 seconds here.
Okay.
You remember in 96, you had on your TV show, you had Hillary Clinton at the Lincoln Center, and she talked, she said she admitted talking to Eleanor Roosevelt.
Right.
wrote about her imaginary conversations with Eleanor Roosevelt in a syndicated column on June 10th.
She said she talked to Eleanor Roosevelt about the role of First Lady, and then an advisor of Mrs. Clinton decided it was time to downplay that.
Mrs. Clinton indeed has admitted to channeling Eleanor Roosevelt.
We found a humorous way of graphically illustrating that at Rush Limbaugh, on the TV show, actually.
Maybe we can dig that up and give you an idea what it was.
In the meantime, a quick time out.
▲
Export Selection