All Episodes
Previous Next
Sept. 17, 2007 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:13
September 17, 2007, Monday, Hour #3
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Hi, how are you?
Welcome back.
I, ladies and gentlemen, am well-known radio racing tour, general all-around good guy, harmless, lovable little fuzzball, Rush Limbaugh, meeting and surpassing all audience expectations on a daily basis.
Great to have you with us.
Telephone number 800-282-2882, the email address rush at EIBNet.com.
Now, last week, we just read the latest poverty figures.
And the latest poverty figures say there are 37 million so-called poor in this country.
And we arrive at that figure by not counting the government benefits they get.
Now, this is key for where I'm headed.
We don't count the various welfare programs that they all subscribe to, the food that they get, all of those things.
It's important to keep that in mind.
Now, we are also told through various entities, and especially today with Mrs. Clinton announcing her Save the World health care program, that there are 47 million people without health insurance of any kind.
Now, do these figures make any sense to anybody?
How can you have 37 million so-called poor people, yet 47 million people without insurance of any kind?
The impression that the Libs want to leave is that there are 47 million people who can't afford it for one reason or another.
There are 47 million people who can't afford it.
There are 47 million people who have rotten bosses that won't provide it.
We don't know how many illegal immigrants are included in the 47 million, for example.
But it clearly isn't true that there are 47 million people who cannot afford health insurance in this country.
There may be a large percentage of them that choose to spend their money on plasma TVs instead of health insurance because they're in their 20s and 30s.
Or they may be buying SUVs instead of health insurance because that's their choice right now.
But the Libs want us all to think that this country is so unfair.
It's so rotten.
It's so mean.
47 million sick people just crying out in the wilderness for health insurance.
And this country is telling them to go to hell.
That's what the Libs want you to believe.
Let's go back to the 37 million so-called poor.
One of the Bennys that they get is called Medicaid.
That is Medicare for the poor.
Medicare is for seasoned citizens.
Medicaid is for the poor.
So how can we say 37 million people or 47 million uninsured when 37 million poor people have access to Medicaid, which is essentially health care?
Now, doesn't this suggest that a large number of the 47 million without insurance are without insurance by choice?
Either because they're self-insured or they've decided to spend their money on something else?
And I want to, where exactly in the Constitution does Mrs. Clinton have the power to dictate health care for all Americans?
That's going to be a long battle, folks, because they're back and they're going to go about it in a very stealth-like fashion this time rather than a comprehensive do-it-all-at-once program like they tried last time.
And the SHIPS program is going to be one of the first areas that they will try.
So just buckle up because this is going to be fundamental to educating people on the dangers of electing a Democrat to the White House in 2008.
Now from Salon.com, a story entitled So Long White Boy.
Could 2008 be the year that Democrats finally admit an old sweetheart is never coming back and stop pandering to the white male voter?
This is by Thomas Schaller or Schaller.
I'm not sure how his name is pronounced.
I don't know who he is.
He's not identified.
You know, somebody sent me some hand sanitizer, and it stinks like perfume.
Like Avon came calling or some such thing.
Normally, that stuff you put it on, it has little aroma or odor, but it goes away.
It goes away.
The scent goes away.
This stuff feels like I'm in New Orleans in a red light district with this stuff on my hands.
Anyway, where was I?
Oh, yes.
Those who have been closely following the politics of Democrat primaries may have noticed that somebody's missing.
I'm not talking about Bob Schrum or the Reverend Sharpton, anybody else.
I'm talking about the white male voter, or at least a certain long-coveted variety thereof.
He is variously known as NASCAR Dad, a shirt-sleeved, straight-talking, these colors don't run fellow who votes his cultural values above all else, or Bubba, as Steve Jarding and Dave Mudcat Saunders affectionately call him in their book Foxes in the Hen House.
Start looking on milk cartons for Bubba because he's vanished, and not a moment too soon.
The Democrat obsession with the down-home blue-collar white male voter, that heartbreaker who crossed the aisle to the Republicans many decades ago, may finally be coming to a merciful end.
Boy, here's this.
I don't even know if this guy understands how elitist and arrogant this guy sounds.
Get rid of those hicks.
We don't want them in the Democrat Party, and it's a waste of time to try to go get them, is what he's saying.
The simplest explanation for Bubba's absence to date, I want you people to know this is you, you Bubbas out there, as defined by this guy and other Democrats, you NASCAR types, you southern hayseed hicks.
This is what they've always thought of you.
They don't like you.
They don't want you in their party.
They are embarrassed to have you amongst them.
And this guy's letting it be known.
The simplest explanation for Bubba's absence to date is that none of the 2008 Democrat contenders provides an obvious home for his vote.
Despite accusations that Hillary Clinton is prone to dropping her Gs when talking to rural or southern audiences, it's difficult to imagine the former First Lady making overt appeals to a group that regards her with something verging on rabid disgust.
Barack Obama, a former Chicago street activist, not easily mistaken for a good old boy, ditto for Christopher Dodd, Mike Revelle, Dennis Kucinich, and Bill Richardson.
But the underlying reason may be demographics.
In 1952, according to calculations performed by Emory University political scientist Alan Abramowitz for Salon, 1952, Salon didn't exist.
Oh, they did the calculations now for 1952.
Anyway, white males were nearly half the American electorate.
Thanks to the recent growth in the Latino population, however, the white male share is now dropping about a percentage point a year, accelerating a decline that began with the increased in the franchisehood of African Americans in the civil rights era.
In next year's election, white males may account for fewer than one out of three voters.
Bubba is no longer a kingmaker.
But the candidacy that most testifies to Bubba's declining stock is that of the Breck girl.
And we can all explain this, folks.
At first blush, Edwards, the southern populist, seems ideally suited to corner the market on working-class white male voters.
But aside from his homegrown accent, Edwards displays none of the affectations or semiotics that might once have signaled his intent to woo them.
There are no Lamar Alexander-style flannel shirts and no sponsorship a la Florida Senator Bob Graham four years ago of a NASCAR racing team.
Instead, Edwards hammers the issue of economic justice largely, if not completely, with overt cultural appeal.
This is not why Bubba doesn't go for Edwards.
Do I have to say it?
Do I have to say why Bubba doesn't go for Edward?
No, I'm not going to say it.
I don't have to say it.
He's not one of them.
This guy is a phony effete little linguini spine snob.
Imagine this guy showing up to start a NASCAR race with the mirror and the hairspray and all this.
You know, making sure.
Anyway, the upshot here is that at Salon.com, they are happy that you hayseed hick bubbas, you NASCAR types, are no longer in large enough numbers in this country to make political candidates successful.
and they're happy to be done with you.
Last Friday, I think it was, it had to be Thursday night or Friday, New Mexico governor and Democrat presidential candidate Governor Bill Richardson released a statement about the New England Patriots and their punishment handed out by the NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell said, and I kid you not on this, said Governor Richardson, the president has been allowed to spy on Americans without a warrant.
And our U.S. Senate is letting it continue.
You know something's wrong when the New England Patriots face stiffer penalties for spying on innocent Americans than Dick Cheney and George Bush.
The Patriots were spying on innocent Americans.
Would somebody show me one American has been spied on?
But what a statement.
The New England Patriots face stiffer penalties for spying on innocent Americans, the New York Jets.
Innocent?
Have you seen the list of Democrats that Norman Shu gave money to?
What a great list.
Ted Kennedy, Barack Obama, Bill Richardson, John Kerry, Bill Nelson, Jay Rockefeller, Diane Feinstein, Patrick Kennedy, Harold Ford, Tom Vilsack, former governor of Iowa, Dingy Harry, Tom Harkin, Frank Lautenberg of New Jersey, Fast Eddie Rendell, governor of Pennsylvania, and Barbara Boxer.
Since 2004, Norman Shu has donated 260 grand to Democrat Party groups and federal candidates and raised hundreds of thousands of additional dollars.
And the story is out, if you needed money, call Shu.
And Shu would come up with the money.
And the New York Times had a little story on the guy here.
And it's kind of sad in a way.
Fundraiser's wallet matched his need to please.
There are quotes here from people.
Hey, yeah, we'd call Norman.
They'd say, Norman, we need 50 grand, and he'd do it.
And the upshot of the story, he just wanted to be liked.
He just wanted acceptance.
He knew he was a nerd.
He knew he was a geek.
He knew he wasn't in the big click, and he wanted to be liked.
He just wanted to get in and be with the big boys.
He also, in this story, it says, wanted to launder his fraudulent past through the Clinton campaign.
Several prominent Clinton donors who spent time with Shu recall him as an indefatigable networker willing to take on any fundraising need, even from low-level Clinton staff members.
I think he was motivated by a desire to rebuild his identity, his image, to launder his fraudulent past through Democrats in the Clinton campaign.
Wrong laundromat, Mr. Shu.
If you want to look clean, the last thing you do is go through the Clintons.
How in the unbelievable, but this is not the end of the story, ladies and gentlemen.
Andrea Mitchell, NBC News, Washington, was on Chris Matthews' show on Sunday, said this about Hillary's campaign staff and Norman Shu.
With a Norman Shu money raising controversy, for the first time, there's a real concern in the Clinton camp that this is real baggage from the Clinton White House years.
There's a lot of stress, a lot of damage control, a lot of finger pointing, and in fact, stress so high that there was a shouting match observed among Clinton staffers in public last week.
Ooh, ooh, this is a trick.
This is a trick.
Now, I'm telling you what happened.
I'll tell you exactly what happened here, folks.
We got the story last week.
It was Novak.
Robert Novak had the story that, hey, this shoe problem is Hillary.
She won't delegate.
Hillary is so hands-on, she's got, she doesn't leave this to chance.
Now, all of a sudden, Andrea Mitchell has a story that the staff's out there fighting amongst themselves who's to blame for this.
This is just designed to take the heat off Mrs. Clinton.
It's like this: American prospect story.
This story coming out a day or two before Mrs. Clinton's big announcement.
This is an old defense attorney trick.
It is.
A question from the official program observer Bo Snerdley.
Yes, sir.
Mm-hmm.
Mm-hmm.
Right.
Well, Snerdley's question asked in a peak and a fit of mild rage was this.
How come, as far as the Democrats in a drive-by is concerned, anybody who even had a cup of coffee with Jack Abramoff deserves to be in jail?
And yet with Norman Shu, he just wanted to be liked because it's a New York Times-running cover.
This story, remember I told you to keep a sharp eye on the New York Times?
The New York Times decided this was too hot for them to be able to support Mrs. Clinton.
They have apparently decided it's not.
And this piece is really to give her some cover on this.
Shoe, well, plus, he's a sympathetic figure.
He tried to commit suicide and got on the California Zephyr out there.
And now just get $5 million.
What a pathetic.
He just wanted to be liked.
Do you know that characteristic, do you know who that's aimed?
That's aimed at the Oprah audience.
We got to feel sorry for this poor guy.
Look at him.
Look at the pictures.
That poor bedraggled guy is out away from his home country of Hong Kong.
He just wants to be liked.
We all want to be liked.
We all want to be liked.
We all want to be.
Norman Shue just wanted to be, he wanted to be liked by the big guys.
Nobody, nobody, apparently even the people who were swindled don't care that they were swindled.
One guy cares he was.
I know.
Mr. Snirdby, you don't have to convince me.
In fact, I would pose this to you as a thought.
Norman Shu has jumped bail twice.
He still gets bail if he can meet it $5 million.
O.J. Simpson, no bail.
Twice.
No bail for O.J.
And he's innocent.
He was found not guilty.
He's languid.
He's rotting away in the Las Vegas jail till his hearing on Wednesday.
No bail.
Norman Shu bailed three times.
He may not be able to meet this last time.
But anyway, this American prospect thing, it's an old defense attorney's trick.
What you do, you put at the same time, you put out contrary theories to appease two different groups of people.
While Hillary's out there in Iowa lauding her health care credentials from 1993 to gain the support of the Libs and the drive-bys, this American Prospect story comforts middle-of-the-road folks that think Hillary Care in 93 was a debacle by trying to convince them that she didn't really do it and taking the strong rebukes of the Republicans out of play.
So in other words, this whole thing is to give her a clean slate, ladies and gentlemen.
The American Prospect.
That's what it's all about there.
All right, Tracy in Beverly Hills, Michigan.
You're next on the EIB network.
Hello.
Hi, Rush.
Tim, I'm so happy to talk to you.
Thank you.
I'm calling because I kind of got sucked in a little bit last night to watching the Emmys.
You're the one.
Yeah, there were 36 of us.
I was one of them.
And I just recall hearing about a creative Emmys brought, or not even a broadcast, but a presentation of awards a week ago for technical Emmys, behind-the-scenes stuff, animation, some reality awards, other programming, and kind of boring stuff, I guess, stuff that wouldn't really interest us as much as Best Actor, Best Actress.
Well, apparently, the ratings were down 20% last night compared to last year.
The New England Patriots and the San Diego Chargers creamed the Emmys.
Is that so?
Yeah.
I wouldn't make it up.
Well, the lead-in to the Emmys was the Detroit Lions, and they won.
Maybe.
Wait, I was watching that game.
I don't know who the announcers were, because I was switching back and forth to that game and the Raiders and the Broncos and the Cheaps and the Chicago Bears and the Fish and the Dallas Cowgirls.
The Cowboys.
And I was watching somebody calling them the Cowgirls yesterday.
And I happened to be zooming past the Lions game when they went into overtime.
And whoever the announcer was, I thought it was one of the funniest lines now.
I said, well, I guess neither the Lions nor the Vikings are interested in watching the Emmys tonight.
Exactly.
I thought that line was hilarious.
It was, and I guess Fox had the Emmys, and that was just their way of promoting the Emmy.
But the Emmys didn't draw that well last night.
No, they didn't.
But just as far as the Lions go, I think we're all hoping that Kitten is the real deal here.
But, okay, back to my point.
So the creative Emmys were last week, and they're going through their Emmys in pretty good fashion last night, I thought.
And then they go to a category that's entitled Creative Achievement and Interactive Television.
Okay, hang on right there, you know, because, you know, I interrupted you during this call.
This is not your fault.
This diarrhea of the mouth episode is the fault of the host.
I got to take a break.
Hang on.
We'll come back and get your point after this.
I know.
All right, we're back here.
And we're back to Tracy Beverly Hills, Michigan.
You're talking about the Emmys that nobody watched.
Yes, I am.
So I'll recap.
Okay, so they were going through some awards like Best Actress in a sitcom, Best Actor in a Sitcom, some writing stuff, some director stuff.
And then they come to the Creative Achievement and Interactive Television.
And a gentleman, I can't recall who the creator of MySpace is, but they go to him and he presents Al Gore with the Award for Creative Achievement and Interactive Television for Current TV, his youth-oriented television show.
Right, which nobody really watches.
I honestly, you know, I'm fairly, I don't know.
I know a little bit of my way around the internet here.
And quite honestly, I've heard a little bit about it a few years ago, but it's not even on the map.
And I just thought this is just such a good thing.
No, bitch.
Liberals are awarded for their good intentions, not their results.
Okay, and that might be true.
But I just thought, you know, this is another opportunity to march this guy out there in order to exercise their agenda.
Tracy, it's exactly right.
Look at, here's the drill.
Al Gore does a global warming movie.
He does not win the Oscar for it.
Other people win the Oscars.
No, but he walks on stage.
But he walks on stage, and so the drive-bys in their idiocy think he won an Oscar.
So they think he won an Oscar.
Now they think last night he won an Emmy, which he did.
Now it's on to the Nobel Peace Prize.
He did a PowerPoint presentation, but he walked up on the stage, even though it was supposed to be the executive producers who were part of the inconvenient truth.
He did a PowerPoint presentation, but they held him up on a, well, like Oscar himself, saying, oh, this man created this wonderful masterpiece for us to follow its path.
Wait, wait, wait, wait now.
Are we talking about current TV?
No, now we're back at the Oscars.
But it was the same thing because he got a standing ovation.
And then the gentleman next to him said, you know, yes, people, I thank him too.
I thank him too for his vision, for his courage.
What do you expect that you're going to say when you turn on this stuff, Tracy?
I am shocked at you.
Well, here's the thing that bugs me.
I mean, gosh, I mean, don't, they had the creative and technical Emmys last week, and they couldn't, you know, just kind of.
No, no, they're not going to, they're not going to bury Al Gore in the technical Emmys that they do from some alley studio on a Saturday night with still cameras.
That's no, you know what the drill is here.
This is on to the Nobel Peace Prize.
This is a fundamental part of the feminist agenda.
It's all the same thing, a liberal agenda.
You know the drill.
This is incredible from CNN.
This headline: Clinton unveils mandatory health care insurance plan.
They've been trying to hide that aspect.
You know what the name of her health plan is?
American Health Choices Plan.
The name of her health care plan is American Health Choices Plan.
CNN bollocks this up and properly characterizes it as mandatory.
Do you hear what Hillary said?
Hillary on September 3rd went over and talked to the ARP Legislative Conference, the American Association for Retired Persons.
She said, when I'm president, privatization is off the table.
It is not the answer to anything.
By the way, Hugo Chavez has said much the same thing about the schools.
Hugo Chavez is going to take over the public schools over there because you can't let the private sector just run away with things.
So here's Mrs. Clinton.
Mandatory socialism in the schools, mandatory health care in the country.
And get this.
Do you people remember Barry Manilow?
You remember Barry Manilow?
You love Barry Manilow?
You don't like.
You to this day still listen to Barry Manilow?
All right.
Well, Barry Manilow has pulled out of his scheduled appearance on The View tomorrow because he disagrees with Elizabeth Hasselbeck's conservatism, conservative views.
In an exclusive statement to TMZ.com, Barry Manilow said, I strongly disagree with her views.
I think she's dangerous and offensive.
I will not be on the same stage as her.
He's currently on a press tour promoting the release of his new album, Great Songs of the 70s.
In a related Barry Manilow story, a Colorado judge has sentenced people busted for noise pollution to one hour of listening to unpopular or unusual music.
Most young adult offenders were kept in a room and made to listen to Dolly Parton's I Will Always Love You, Karen Carpenter, and Barry Manilow with the volume up loud.
Most offenders who were not allowed to eat, drink, read, or sleep found the punishment funny at first, but then the boredom set in.
After about 20 minutes, I was trying not to fall asleep, said offender Luis Cano.
Judge Paul Sacco, carries out the punishment about four times a year, said the sentence fit the crime.
Look, when you have a person playing rap at extreme volumes all over the city and you have to sit down and listen for an hour to Barry Manilow, it is horrible punishment.
Judge Sacco said his love for music and helping youth inspired the unusual sentence.
Barry, you an idiot.
You're just an absolute idiot.
You're trying to promote an album out there, and you refuse to.
You've just told half the buying public in the country that you don't care if they buy your music or not.
It's an idiot.
Just an absolute idiot.
Diane in New York City, welcome to the Rush Limbaugh program.
Hello.
Well, thank you.
Guy.
Guy.
Rush.
I don't know how you do it, but I'm so grateful that you do this for us.
I think I'd have a heart attack screaming back at the regular news if I couldn't laugh along with you.
Well, that's the point of it.
You've got to laugh at it.
Take it seriously at the same time.
We mix both of them this program.
Well, I take it seriously, too.
And I'm calling in to tell you that I was so outraged at the New York Times moveon.org anti-Petraeus ad that was out there before Petraeus even spoke that I decided I'd go up and put my opinion out in front of the New York Times building last Friday.
I walked up there with my poster that said the New York Times sold out General Petraeus and at a discount rate.
And I stood out there for four hours.
And a couple of people from the Times came out.
One of them said a nasty thing at me.
Another man said, well, we've already solved that problem.
Another woman came out of the Times and said, you're right, you're right.
But the most amazing thing was that in the four hours that this grandmother was standing out there all by herself, at least 100 people came by and gave me the thumbs up or patted me on the back or said, you're right, you're right.
Tell them to the Times.
And this wonderful.
You've got all excited, Diane.
Do not get all excited.
Those were tourists.
No, I believe that.
They were not native.
Native no, no, no, no.
Native New Yorkers.
They're not going to give you a thumbs up on that.
Well, a wonderful union man, they were working all kinds of construction around the Times Square there.
Union man came over in a shirt and said, oh, this is.
They were illegal aliens.
No, they weren't.
These were all big, strong men, real men, not the little kinds of guys you see walking into the Times.
That was my own form of censorship there.
Oh, sorry, Barry.
It's okay.
But they were so sweet.
It was like standing on a New York City street corner, and you see 100 good friends walk by telling truth.
It sounds like it renewed your sense of spirit and identity in New York and maybe even in America.
One little person standing out there saying the truth, I think, empowers a hundred other people.
We're very proud of you.
That was very courageous.
That is really an amazing thing.
You just did it by yourself.
Went down there with your sign.
You stood outside.
You took a little verbal abuse from some Times people, but you got your accolades out there.
The Times doesn't get protested much.
Liberal organizations like this don't get protested.
That's a great move.
And I'm glad that you got the reaction that you got, even if it was from tourists.
Speaking of the Emmys last night, ladies and gentlemen, this was Sally Field.
When she made her acceptance speech, I guess she won the Emmy for lead actress in a drama series for something called Brothers and Sisters.
And here's a portion of her remark.
And to especially the mothers who stand with an open heart and wait, wait for their children to come home from danger, from harm's way, and from war.
Hurry up!
Riot!
I have to finish talking!
I, to those of you who had to war, oh, God, I forgot what I was going to say.
And to war, I am proud.
I am proud to be one of those women.
And let's face it, if the mothers ruled the world, there would be no well, well, well, Sally Field, who first embarrassed herself at the Oscars, but you love me, you really love me, don't you?
Has now come out and amidst all the stuttering and losing her place and screeching at the audience to shut up so she could finish, has essentially said that if mothers ruled the world, there would be no blank-blank war.
Has she forgotten Margaret Thatcher?
Has she forgotten Golda Meir?
Has she forgotten Indira Gandhi?
Has she forgotten the Amazons?
The Amazon babes, we named a division in the U.S. Army after me, All-American First Cavalry Amazon, whatever it was.
And then we've got, does somebody want to tell me Mrs. Clinton doesn't start wars?
Mrs. Clinton started more wars in the time she's been in Washington than anybody I can remember.
Dean in Johnson City, Johnston City, Tennessee.
Hello.
Hello, Rush.
Just find it interesting that the Democratic Party is giving up on us, old boys in the South.
And we're talking about the party that gave us Jimmy Carter and Al Gore and Bill and Hillary Clinton.
That I find out rather humorous.
And I'm glad they gave up on us because I'm tired of getting their garbage in the mail.
You know what?
I think the truth of this, Dean, is that the salon guy writing for the Democrats is a day late and a dollar short.
I think what's happened here is that you good old boys have told him to take a hike.
And they finally figured it out.
And so what they're doing in their usual acts of superiority is saying, screw these guy.
We don't want these hayseeds amongst us anyway.
You got to hear.
Let's go to Soundbite 14.
Audio Soundbite 14, Kerry and McCain.
John Kerry, who served in Vietnam.
John McCain yesterday on Pete the Press with Tim Russer.
There's a little who's on first routine about Iraq and a number of other things.
This administration took their eye off of him and chose to go to war in a place that had nothing to do with the war on terror.
And the fact is, as I said before, Al-Qaeda loves our being in Iraq.
If you want to put al-Qaeda off balance, then change the equation.
And Iran loves the fact that we're in Iraq.
And Iran is getting stronger.
And Iran is getting stronger.
Excuse me.
And Iran loves to be in Iraq, and they are.
Well, Iran is in Iraq.
And al-Qaeda is in Iraq.
And Al-Qaeda is, if we don't continue to beat them back, will be a major influence and have training bases.
And they have because they will.
Yes, you are, because we've said we're going to continue to go back to the state.
You are asking to go back to a failed strategy that had failed for nearly four years that many of us pointed out that you voted for, by the way.
So I hope that we will have the patience and the understanding on the part of the American people that they've made great sacrifice and all of us are saddened by it.
But I hope we can also point out the consequences of failure, which is what the Democrats are proposing now.
The Kane taking it to Senator Kerry, who served in Vietnam.
Let's go grab Subite 13 because Russert, you know, they're frustrated because Bush basically said, we're going to hang on and we're going to go until we win this thing.
And the Democrats wanted the war to be solved and off the table and the troops brought home before their president is inaugurated in 2009.
So Russert says to Kerry, so what do the Democrats do now?
If you want to stop the war, you have one choice, and that's in effect to stop the funding, close down the government, say not one more penny for the war in Iraq, Mr. President.
Otherwise, this war is going to go forward as President Bush intends it to.
Everything depends on having 60 votes or 67 votes to override a veto.
So any law that we pass, the president has the power through a pen to be able to negate.
That is what the 2008 election will be significantly about.
How do you make America stronger?
I believe the president's rhetoric and the rhetoric of those who talk about surrender and who talk about the Democrats choosing to lose is insulting and incorrect.
We're choosing to win for America.
You are not choosing to win for America, and everybody knows it.
From the Chicago Tribune today, I'm sorry, Chicago Sun-Times, a column by Steve Huntley.
Iraq promises could haunt a Democrat president.
This column, this column is another one of these Russia's right things, even though Mr. Huntley may not know it.
Would a President Hillary Clinton as the first woman commander-in-chief or a President Barack Obama as the first African-American chief exec want to begin work in the White House by ordering an American army to retreat from the field of battle?
That doesn't exactly sound like the way you'd want to start a historic presidency.
Goes on to say, hey, they're not going to pull out of there.
His point is exactly what I have made to you.
They want Bush to surrender so that they don't have to be the ones to surrender because they're not going to surrender.
Another Clinton donor has been put in jail.
Federal authorities on August 27th arrested two members of a New York family of political donors and are seeking a third in India.
A complaint filed in New Jersey federal court by an inspector of the U.S. Postal Inspection Services charges the three with mortgage fraud.
They're alleged to have bought properties, resold them to fictional buyers at higher prices, and taken out inflated mortgages.
The father, Singh Sabarwal, is a prominent figure in New York's Sikh community who has contributed to political causes ranging from Chuck Schumer to the Republican National Congressional Committee.
The two sons are currently being held without bail.
This is from thepolitico.com.
Another Clinton donor has been put in jail, ladies and gentlemen.
Who's next?
Let me take a break here.
We've got to figure out where we want to go after the break.
Don't go away.
Okay, back to the phones we go.
El Quicko, this is Frida in Los Angeles.
Hi, Frida.
Thanks for calling.
Hello, hi.
Regarding Sally Field's comment, we also have to remind Sally Field that also mothers are raising suicide bombers in Gaza, in Chechen, and in Iran.
So not all mothers.
Let's not hold for any mother.
Excellent point.
That's an excellent point.
It is rare that a caller comes up with something that I haven't, but you did.
All of these jihadist mothers who are raising their little kids to be absolutely right.
Well, Sally Field is just, it's a shame.
Well, it is.
It's just how you have to, though, give her credit.
She knows she's an idiot.
And she is willing to go on national TV and prove it.
And that kind of courage, ladies and gentlemen, is rare in our society.
You have a wonderful day.
And we'll see you tomorrow.
Can't wait to be back.
▲
Export Selection