All Episodes
Previous Next
Sept. 12, 2007 - Rush Limbaugh Program
34:22
September 12, 2007, Wednesday, Hour #3
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Yes, yes, yes, yes.
I have been properly informed now.
I know that it is Prada.
A company's prod.
It's somebody's last name, and they've been around for a hundred years, and they do female clothes with an edge.
I am not a fashionista.
So I'll be honest, folks.
I haven't bought any new clothes in five years, other than golf and uh casual attire.
Dress shirts, suits, sport coats.
I hate it.
And I do it all at once if it takes six hours and then I'm done with it for five years.
I hate it.
So I don't haven't been to a mall in 20 years, so you'll have to forgive me for not knowing how to pronounce Prada.
Anyway, greetings and welcome back.
Rush Limbaugh here on the EIB network.
800 282-2882 is the phone number if you'd like to join us.
The email address, rush at EIB net.com.
They had a story in the uh last hour, ladies and gentlemen from the Politico.com, in which it was stated that the Democrats are searching for a new policy now, a new strategy, if you will, on Iraq.
They don't quite know what to do.
Well, I here it is.
Headline, Democrats scramble for Iraq strategy.
The Democrats are scrambling to deal with a new dynamic on Capitol Hill, that they're the ones trying to come up with a new political strategy on the war.
That alone says a mouthful.
I mean, that here we have a war over the U.S. national security, and they're looking at it as a political issue and trying to come up with strategy, but they have.
Bottom line is they've come up with a strategy.
Senate Democrat leader Dingy Harry Reid just saw him on the tube.
Uh says that uh the Senate Democrats reject the call by General Petraeus for a reduction of as many as 30,000 U.S. troops in Iraq by next summer, saying it is not enough.
Withdrawing 30,000 troops does not go far enough.
So the new strategy is the old strategy.
The new strategy is no, you gotta pull them all out, much more than that, and do it much sooner.
We disagree.
That's their new strategy, which is their old strategy.
Have you heard about a poll?
I didn't talk about this poll, but there's a uh a poll uh that is a Zogbi poll.
Forty-two percent of Americans believe that President Bush either caused 9-11 or let it happen.
Did you see that poll?
Well, and I saw it.
I don't want to report.
That's that's that's just I think in that number, 35% of Democrats.
Remember that?
35% of Democrats, and I thought that that that just tells us how kooky they've got.
Well, it turns out there's a there's a blog out there called Sweetness and Light.
And they have dug up some information suggesting that Iran may have paid for that poll.
The poll was commissioned by Press TV, which is owned and operated by the Iranian government.
From Zagby International, Press TV, Zogby International poll results survey methodology, 9607 through 9907.
Zogby International was commissioned by Press TV to conduct a telephone survey of adults.
Now, if you go to Wikipedia, Press TV is defined as this.
It's an English language international TV news channel funded by the Iranian government.
Based in Tehran.
It broadcasts in English on around the clock schedule, with 26 international correspondents, more than 400 staff around the world.
Its stated mission is to offer a different and unbiased view of the world events.
Now, Sweetness and Light says that that, well, actually, I think uh uh I'm not sure who's saying this.
But somebody's saying it's either the American thinker or um sweetness and light, but but the the point that they're making here is this work by Zagbi on behalf of Iran may be illegal, since uh American businesses have been restricted from dealing with Iran because of its sponsorship of terrorism, although some of these sanctions have been subsequently relaxed.
Uh well that's that's that's cool.
The Iranians paying Zogby to do a poll that comes a 42% believe that uh Bush either knew or allowed 9-11 to happen.
Here's another story of Norman Shue.
This is from uh NBC Channel 11, and the Associated Press also contributed to this.
A strange article.
Uh, An anonymous tip to the FBI led to the arrest of disgraced Democrat fundraiser Norman Shue in Colorado, according to recently unsealed court documents.
Shue, who appeared suddenly in the New York political scene about four years ago, had been scheduled to appear in court last week for a bail reduction hearing, but skipped town, forfeiting two million dollars in bail.
He took the California Zephyr out of Emeryville at about the same time of his court appearance.
He is under guard at St. Mary's Hospital in Grand Junction, Colorado.
He was arrested at the hospital after he was taken from the eastbound Amtrak train for treatment of an undisclosed ailment.
Here's the last two sentences of the story.
It is not clear when Shoe will be released from the hospital.
NBC 11 reported he was taken to the surgical wing.
Okay.
He was taken to the surgical wing.
By the way, ladies and gentlemen, you've heard the term culture of corruption floating around out there, especially as it applies to Republicans.
Culture of corruption.
Clinton fundraising is not the culture of corruption.
It's the definition of corruption.
And that's how you have to look at this.
Norman Shue and all this.
By the way, speaking speaking about this Iranian-funded poll from Zogby, Fidel Castro said the U.S. government misinformed Americans and the world about 9-11, echoing conspiracy theories about the terror attacks against the U.S. six years ago in an essay supposedly written by the grand leader, read by a Cuban TV reporter Tuesday night.
Castro said the Pentagon was hit by a rocket.
Not an airplane, because no traces were found of its passengers.
Today one knows there was deliberate information or misinformation, wrote Castro.
Studying the impact of planes similar to those that hit the Twin Towers that had accidentally fallen on densely populated cities.
One concludes that it was not a plane that crashed into the Pentagon.
Only a projectile could have caused the geometrically round hole that allegedly was made by the plane.
We were fooled like the rest of the planet's inhabitants.
So here you've got the Zogby poll.
42% of Americans think that Bush knew or allowed 9-11 to happen, paid and bought and paid for by the Iranians.
Now Castro comes out with an essay suggesting that 9-11 was an inside job.
Bush administration did it.
It was a um it was a rocket.
Let us go to the audio sound bites.
We're at audio soundbite number three.
Yesterday was the anniversary of 9-11.
What was the focus of ABC anchor Charlie Gibson?
Six years ago, President Bush vowed the people who brought down the Twin Towers would be brought to justice.
The war in Afghanistan was launched for that purpose.
But today Osama bin Laden is alive, releasing new video tapes, and Al Qaeda remains in business.
Yeah, and you know what?
If I uh if bin Laden's alive, certainly Al Qaeda knows, Mr. Gibson, that they have an ally.
Maybe unwitting.
You may be a dupe, but they know how to play you like a fiddle.
And they're doing it on the anniversary of 9-11.
ABC's focus is, of course, that bin Laden is still alive.
Bush hasn't caught him, and he's still making tapes.
Be right back.
Before we go to the phones, another brilliant observation made by me, El Rushbo, because I, ladies and gentlemen, can read these stitches.
I can see the stitches on a fastball.
What is it that the Democrats, who uh who now have their new strategy, and that is their old strategy of saying the troop with druction, they're missing get us out.
We need to have a timetable.
We need to get troops out of there.
So Patraeus comes up with what is not good enough.
They reject it.
They can't, they wouldn't agree with anything.
If Petraeus said we're going to get out in six months, they'd find a way to disagree with that.
It's too soon.
Whatever.
But what do they keep Saying about President Bush.
He has a closed mind.
He can't be changed by new information.
He refuses to deal with reality.
He will not admit his mistakes.
Well, General Petraeus has spoken, not glowingly but realistically about Iraq.
So's Ambassador Crocker.
Now let's see.
Who has the closed mind now?
The President or the left?
Who refuses to be changed by new information?
Who rejects it?
Who doesn't even want to hear the new information?
The president of the drive-by media and the left.
Answer's obvious.
Sorry I brought it up, folks.
May have been wasting time.
Not.
Claudia in Ormond Beach, Florida.
Welcome to the EIB network.
I appreciate your patience in waiting.
Thank you, Russ.
I'm excited to speak with you.
Um I would just like to touch on a point that you were talking about earlier about men eating meat and about Americans having to more or less tighten about because of the high gas prices.
Yeah, that way I'm not saying that.
A bunch of eggheads at Washington University of St. Louis say that as gasoline prices rise that Americans will uh all of a sudden start walking more and eating more healthfully.
Well, I agree with that.
I agree with that.
I don't think it's gonna be I don't think it's gonna happen overnight, but for myself, um it was it was easy to make the transition uh to prioritize my money.
And one of the things that's uh wonderful is radio, listening to radio.
It's fun, it's educational, it's free.
You mean that represents a change for you?
Uh that's a big change for me.
What I did was I cut my cable, I joined a gym.
I don't go to fast food.
I'm buying vegetables, buying fruit.
There's there's so many ways we Americans are so resourceful.
I'm not disputing it.
Wait a minute.
Not disputing that.
Are you but why are you doing this?
Well, because my interpretation was that uh you you said that we're gonna continue with our junk food and continue with uh the fast food I did say that, but uh and I will talk about that in a moment, but I want to why did you all of a sudden decided to go all healthy on us?
Well, it was a matter of if I was gonna tighten the belt, I was gonna do it the right way.
Instead of living to eat, it was No no no, no, no.
Okay, let me just be point blank about this.
Did you do all this because gasoline prices started going up?
Well, yes.
Not only that, uh there were things like like playing the lottery, uh uh things to do with disposable income.
You think I'm kind of spreading it all over a little bit?
But I think we Americans rush.
I think we're resourceful.
I think we can we are if we're left alone.
But we're not being left alone.
We're not being we're our resourcefulness is being denied us.
We're we're slowly being managed and manipulated into doing a bunch of things, not because we want to, but because somebody is making you think we did, because we need to feel guilty about the destructive habit that we are all engaged in.
Well, I think everybody has to come come to their own uh you know, their own decision of what they do too, but that ain't gonna happen if a bunch of liberals end up running the show for a long time.
Nobody's gonna be allowed to come to their own decision because if it's a wrong decision, the liberals will spank them.
Right.
And punish them and so forth.
Now, what is what is this?
Let me just tell you something.
Waiting to talk with you, I've got little tiny daint dainty sweat beads on my cheeks because you just you you just go on and on how you do it.
But I just enjoy you so much.
Well, thank you very much.
What is um I learned so much.
I learned so much from you.
Right, and so you call to disagree with me.
You'll learn so much to just clarify the point.
Just to clarify the point.
I should just call you wifey.
Because here you've just you've you've just you've just told me how smart I am and how much you agree with me and how much you learn, but you call and tell me I'm wrong.
You're fun.
Thank you for taking my call.
All right, Claudia, you have a good day there in Ormond Beach.
Uh, we're going to Wichita next.
This is Jessica.
Hi, Jessica.
Welcome to the EIB network.
Hi, how are you doing?
Fine and dandy, never better.
Wonderful.
Mega Ditto.
Thank you.
I've been listening to you since I was a little girl.
The rush baby, another rush baby, uh, checking in with us here.
Yes, sir.
And um anyway, you've been educating me for years.
Yes.
And I thought I would help to educate you.
On what?
The uh the breast research.
Oh.
sure you want to do this?
I have uh it's it's hang on, hang on.
This this happened about an hour and a half ago, almost two hours ago, and people may not have they don't may not know what you're talking about.
I I I I don't want to have to go through the whole thing, but two geeks, folks, two researchers went out there and studied the movement of the female breast during exercise.
They found that there's an eight-inch up and down movement out there, and uh it becomes really problematic when when you get to the twenty pound uh uh threshold there, and that's that's the first thing in the story that gave me pause.
Spent last night researching this to find out, and I couldn't find anybody to give me any answers.
And they said the movements of the breasts are basically up and down sideways and in and out, and that that also puzzled me.
But it was the twenty pound thing that got me because I know a gallon of water is like nine or ten pounds.
So I and I uh the these these guys obviously kind of researchers wearing pocket protectors in the shirt shirt pocket there.
Just just you know what what a what a life they assigned themselves.
So that's what she's calling about, and I was I admitted I was looking for verification and answers on this, because I don't take the word of researchers.
Okay, so educate me, Jessica.
Um well I can definitely tell you as a very gifted woman up top.
Mine have never moved in and out.
And I have never ever heard of that in my life.
Well, good, because that means my instincts are right, and I should trust my instincts.
Yes, you should.
Um I've had doctors tell me that the best exercise for me would to be swimming, and I've tried that and I can't breathe because they float up into my throat.
So I I can understand another thing I've never heard said before.
Now I've I've never had the inclination to weigh them.
How would you?
I I have no clue.
Another thing I don't know.
But uh I mean, I know how you weigh your pet.
You got on the scale, check your weight, and then you pick up your pet and you got on a scale and see what the new weight is, you know what your pet weighs, but don't know yeah.
Uh I I'm sure these researchers have a method for this because it's in the the calculations are in the story.
Well, it just does not seem logical to weigh a breast.
Does any of this stupid story seem logical to you?
No.
Um I d I don't think that having large breasts should defer women from exercising.
But d well, can does it defer you from exercise?
Um You said you can't swim because it floats into your throat.
Well, I can do the backstroke, but I'm definitely not running cross-country.
Hell no, I wouldn't I wouldn't think so.
I I think by the time you get to that level of endowment that you're referring to here in case of you uh that would be painful.
That would be counterproductive.
You wouldn't you wouldn't you you wouldn't do it long enough to have the exercise pay off.
No, definitely not.
And it's not a good thing.
It actually tears the tissue on the inside.
Yeah.
But I have I have been lifting weights and you know, so there are exercises that you can do.
Have you ever tried golf?
Yes.
You like it?
Yes.
You know, your swing ought to be pretty good.
Because you've got to keep your arms straight.
Well, look, I mean it's it it is what it is.
I'm doing my Ben Wright impersonation here, but you keep your arms straight, it's one of the keys.
Well, keeping my arms straight is not really that much of a possibility.
Not swinging from No, let's that's good.
We'll just accept it.
Okay, on your own uh your own testimony.
Look, I'm glad you called out there, Jessica.
I appreciate it.
Thank you.
Thank you so much.
Well, that's what I was looking for last night.
I was looking for somebody to give me some sort of help on this uh research project.
Now I know a lot of you guys are asking me for specific you you you whoa, what are the specifics?
What is I wasn't gonna go folks, this is a program of dignity and culture and class.
And I was not going to go there and ask for specifics from this woman on uh on that you you should be ashamed of yourselves if that's if that's what was going through your uh through your mind.
Um in Ozark, Missouri, this is Bill, you're next on the EIB network.
Hello.
Hey, Megadetto's Rush.
Thank you, sir.
Long time listener, first time caller.
Great to have you here.
I heard your uh comments about Fidel Castro and what he was had written regarding nine eleven.
Yeah.
It sounded sounded very familiar.
Uh back in 06, prior to the elections, uh, some Democrat friends of mine were passing out DVDs of a movie called Loose Change.
Have you heard of it?
Nope.
Tell me about it quickly.
It's uh basically the whole movie, the premises about why 911 was orchestrated by the government.
Oh, I've heard about yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes.
I've I've heard about that.
Uh in fact, I've I've seen portions of that video on the uh on the website.
I want you to know something.
Popular mechanics on their website has debunked and disproven every contention in that video, and of all these other things that the kooks who claim that all of 9-11 was an inside job was.
Having more fun than a human being should be allowed to have.
Uh latest opinion audit report, by the way, documents.
I am uh almost always right, 98.7% of the time.
All right, it's been a while.
I've been collecting data here, ladies and gentlemen.
So ta-da-da-da-da-da-la-da-da-da-da-da-la-da-da-la-da-la-da-da-la-da-da-la.
It's a global warming update.
And of course, Paul Shanklin, well-known white comedian, and his Al Gore impersonation.
One of our three rotating global warming update themes.
Three global warming stories today.
There's a there's a press release today from EarthTimes.org actually comes from the Hudson Institute.
A new analysis.
Now, this the way this starts here is is key to understand.
The new analysis of peer-reviewed literature reveals that more than five hundred scientists have published evidence refuting at least one element of current man-made global warming scares.
More than 300 of the scientists found evidence that one, a natural moderate 1500-year climate cycle has produced more than a dozen global warmings similar to ours since the last ice age.
And or that two, our modern warming is linked strongly to variations in the sun's irradiance.
This data and the list of scientists make a mockery of recent claims that a scientific consensus blames humans as the primary cause of global temperature increases since 1850, said senior fellow Dennis Avery at the Hudson Institute.
Other researchers found evidence that sea levels are failing to rise importantly, that our storms and droughts are becoming fewer and milder with this warming, as they did during previous global warmings, that human deaths will be reduced with warming because cold kills twice as many people as heat, and six that corals, trees, birds, mammals, and butterflies are adapting well to the routine reality of changing climate.
The names of these five hundred scientists were compiled by Dennis Avery and climate physicist S. Fred Singer, the uh co-authors of the new book, Unstoppable Global Warming Every 1500 Years, and they mainly got these names from the peer-reviewed studies cited in their book.
The researchers' uh specialties included tree rings, sea levels, stalagmites.
Uh you know the difference between a stalagmite and a stalag tite.
Well, you go into a cave, uh, either an underwater cave or uh in Arizona and out in the old west, you'll you'll have a stalag tight is like a a piece of rock that's in the form of a cone upside down, and it hangs from the ceiling of the cave.
A stalagmite is the same thing on the bottom.
And they call a stalag tight a tight because it's got to be tight up there to avoid gravity's pull.
Um so they're studying those things.
Uh they're studying pollen, plankton, in the bottom line is this.
They just went out and they studied all of the scientific writings, and they found five hundred scientists who dispute the consensus of the 327 scientists that the global warming crowd cites.
And I reminded every time I see something like this of the story that was done by these uh these two guys that studied media since 1888, found that every 25 years the media changes its tune.
With either global cooling or Global warming.
Every 25 years there's a new cycle.
It's been that way since the uh since the late 1800s.
So uh just more fodder for this, but uh nobody's denying that there's some warming taking place out there, but it man-made is the is the uh crux of the left's argument on this for the reasons that we've uh gotten into.
From the UK.
This is terribly disappointing to me, and if you want to know why the Labor Party keeps winning elections over there, let me tell you why.
The conservatives in the UK will propose banning plasma televisions and other energy guzzling electric goods in a report to be unveiled next week.
The proposals target white goods like fridges and freezers, as well as TVs, personal computers, and DVD players that use too much energy or operate on standby.
The idea has come from a conservative group set up by David Cameron to develop policies to protect the environment.
Although the measure to make household electrical appliances more energy efficient or not binding on Mr. Cameron, they are thought likely to be warmly received by the Tory leader.
Well, hell yes, they will be.
Guess who gets to control what is in their houses over there now?
No more plasma TVs.
But here is the real PAs that is these things in this story.
Get this.
This conservative group in the UK will also suggest scrapping gross domestic product as a measure of the nation's success in favor of a model that measures people's happiness, drawn up by the friends of the earth.
The conservatives in the UK doing a total sellout.
You gotta get rid of the gross domestic product as a way to measure the economic output and and and productivity and growth of the of the UK, the country and the economy, and instept instead adopt a uh a model that measures people's happiness, drawn up by friends of the earth.
Under the proposals, a cap could be set on the energy use of each electrical appliance, and those exceeding limits could be banned from sale in the UK.
Uh the left is the left, ladies and gentlemen.
And we've we hear about the energy bill.
Finally, in our global warming update.
Uh the energy bill is a waste.
It's typical of the legislation that's coming out of this Congress.
Like the ethics reform bill does not reform ethics.
Uh, nothing that the immigration bill was a sham.
The energy bill does not do what we need to do.
We need to find new sources of energy, go get it, lessen our dependence so forth.
From the weekly standard, one of the key issues that Congress will need to address when it returns in September is legislation to restrict energy production in the U.S. It's not framed that way.
Of course, the legislation being considered is ostensibly supposed to help produce more energy, but that's not the effect it'll have.
Among the myriad problems with the House bill, for example, is that it allows anybody, quote unquote, harmed by global warming to bring suit against any federal agency that fails to reduce its greenhouse gases emissions as required in the legislation.
Plaintiffs are specifically authorized to recover one and a half million dollars and to be compensated for legal fees win or lose as long as the court determines it to be appropriate.
This is in the energy bill.
Essentially, ladies and gentlemen, you will be paid to sue the government for global warming violations.
You will be paid a million and a half dollars plus legal fees if the judge sees fit.
If this provision remains, and if the president were somehow to sign it in to law.
So here is an energy bill that's designed to it's not even as they say in the story designed to increase our output of energy.
It's a full paw, but it's going to end up restriction restricting uh energy production because you.
Can anybody say trial lawyers here?
Ladies and gentlemen.
We'll be right back.
Don't go away.
You would not believe what's happening here.
Mr. Sterdley, I may have just made a mistake.
We had a couple people on the phones that were going to explain to us how to weigh the female breasts.
come on, we've done this enough.
I need to move on with a serious stuff.
Now I have scientists submitting to me PowerPoint presentations on how this could be done.
I just sent it to you, Brian, so you can show them in there.
Uh and and they're thinking of uh submitting this for patent.
This one that is on my computer now.
Uses the breast example from Madonna, and it's a cone.
And has all these intricate formulas for it.
So um it's the entrepreneurial spirit at work, ladies and gentlemen, among members of this uh audience.
In the meantime, we go to Washington.
This is Harry, and it's great to have you, sir.
Welcome.
Hey Rush, I work on Capitol Hill for conservative Republican member on Congress.
Me and my boss are big fans of yours.
Thank you, sir.
You are the most effective communicator of conservative principles in our country today, and it's a pleasure to speak with you again.
Thank you very much.
Rush, my reason for calling is to let you know how your name stopped a Republican member of Congress from sending out official mail to his constituents and let you little n know how these libs got into the Patreon hearing.
Wait a minute now.
You want to tell me how my name stopped a Republican member of Congress from sending out official mail to his constituents.
That is exactly right, Rush.
It happens.
What what am I missing?
Well, um Rush, when you send over five hundred pieces of mail, a mass mail to your constituents that has to be approved by the Franken Commission.
Oh.
Who runs the Franken Commission?
The Dems.
Yeah.
And uh Representative John Micah from Florida wrote a letter to his constituents after the Democrats stole the vote in August on a illegal immigration.
Do you remember that when they were trying to give food stamp benefits to these illegals?
Yes and the Dems stole the vote?
Yes.
Well, this representative wrote a letter to his constituents, and it had your name in it.
It had a quote from your program, I believe.
I or maybe out of the Limbaugh letter, I'm not sure, but the Frank Commission did not approve the letter because it had your name.
That was one of the reasons, Russ.
I guess your name is just too partisan for these libs up here, and they just don't want people knowing the truth.
Well, but you know, this is a troubling thing.
I I appreciate the complimentary aspects of this, but it's a troubling thing.
My name, because the Dems run the Franken Commission, actually prevented the Congressman from getting his letter out to his constituents.
Well, you're the most dangerous man in America, right?
Yeah, but that that was kind of counterproductive there.
Well, you know, it's to it's really sad.
You put Rush Limbaugh's name on a letter, and they're gonna say, Nope, you can't send that to your constituents.
It sounds like we're living in the Soviet Union or something.
Oh gosh, you're not the first person that said that to me.
Because you know, the chilling effect here is you guys write letters to your constituents now.
Can I put that in there?
What are they gonna do to me?
Can I put that in there?
You know, in the Soviet Union, if people got to go to their bathrooms and whisper when they wanted to be honest with each other, because they were so afraid.
That's what's happening here.
Political correctness hadn't gotten that bad, but uh, you know, it it's it's trending in uh in that direction.
You know, I was talking with Mr. Snerdley the other day, watching the Petrayus hearings when they started in the House with uh Congressman Lantos, and I was fantasizing.
I w I I would love it might be worth becoming a congressman for just two years to get on one of these committees and just launch at these guys like I would love to when they start playing tricks like that.
And I would love to be called to testify as an official witness on that.
I know that's never gonna happen.
Rush, you would be the best Congressman that has ever walked the halls of the United States Congress.
And I mean that with all sincerity.
Well, you're very kind.
I appreciate this.
You've uh you've you've made my day here.
Well, Rush, I I want to tell you one more thing about the lawn uh line standards and how code Pink got in this hearing.
And I hate to hurt your action ratings.
Your instincts are usually right even when they think that they are wrong, but you're not entirely right about how code Pink got in this hearings.
Did that was not Democrat staffers that got him in there?
Well, you the reason you thought that Rush is because the Dems brought Cindy Sheehan of the State of the Union address.
So obviously your instincts would tell you that the Dems would give VIP seats at Code Pink at these Petrayus hearings.
But how anybody in the public can get in these hearings, they're usually wackos, because if any good hearing rush, the queue starts the day before, and you have to spend the night in the heat.
You have to sit there all day, and that's how you get a seat.
And anyone can go if you want to stay up all night.
The only other option, Rush, is to pay off somebody, and there is a huge line standard business in Washington.
You can make thousands of dollars just sitting there standing in line.
All these lobbyists who want to come in and hear a hearing, they aren't gonna wait overnight.
They're gonna pay a thousand Bucks to get a seat.
So and deduct it.
So uh uh the the code pink babes were in that line of the the staffers cannot get people into these hearings.
You have to have a staff ID badge.
I mean, the staffer technically could not, I mean, they could sneak someone in, and the Dems, if they did that, it wouldn't surprise me.
But Rush, you see how they dress their wackos.
They would they probably had a big party hanging out on the street at night.
Pity the people ahead of sit next to them in there.
The well's rushing.
Well, there's still a swamp in Washington this time.
Let me ask you a question.
The Democrats upset.
I mean, I saw Ike Skelton going berserk here uh when the Code Pink people disrupted.
They don't really mind that, do they?
Rush, they love it.
It reaches out to their wackos.
It's the people who are going to vote for them in their primary.
Some of them, the respectable ones, and uh, you know, Ike as a respectful member of Congress, but some of them uh love it, Rush.
They absolutely love it.
And before I have to run Rush, I want to say many of my interns were so disappointed that you did not come to speak at the internal lecture series when you were invited.
Oh, you remember when you got that letter you read on air a few months ago by Senator Feinstein?
Oh, yeah.
Yeah.
I had thousands of interns up here rushing.
Could not wait to hear of the great communicator himself, Rushlin Ball.
I had forgotten about that.
He's absolutely right.
Senator Feinstein invited me to come speak to the Democrat uh uh uh freshman.
This it was a form letter, obviously, but I should have tell I that that was I'd totally forgotten about that until you uh till you reminded me.
Anyway, we gotta run a quick time out here.
We'll be back and close it out right after this.
Time is tight, ladies and gentlemen.
We will squeeze it in there.
Late arriving show prep, Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton, whose campaign is returning eight hundred and fifty thousand dollars in contribution, uh, contributions linked to uh disgraced fundraiser Norman Shu indicated uh today that donors who contributed that money could donate to her presidential campaign once again.
In a teleconference with reporters, uh Mrs. Clinton said, We're not asking that that be done, but I believe that the vast majority of those two hundred plus donors are perfectly capable of making up their own minds about what they will or won't do going forward.
Now, when the Clintons tell you, after you've given them money and they've been forced to give it back to you, when they tell you that you are capable of making up your own mind about you what you will or won't do going forward, they are sending you a message, and there's nothing subtle about it or even subliminal.
Uh this is the same AP writer, by the way, that praised Hillary as a victim uh for giving the money back that we told you about earlier in the show.
All right.
▲
Export Selection