All Episodes
Previous Next
Sept. 11, 2007 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:21
September 11, 2007, Tuesday, Hour #1
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome to today's edition of the Rush 24-7 podcast.
Nice to see everybody seated in there on time and uh and ready to go.
I, of course, always on time.
We can't be late uh in broadcasting, ladies and gentlemen, not with the live presentations.
Cannot be late.
This is why most nonprofession media people quit after one week.
When they find out there's no lunch break, there's no coffee break, and you can't be late.
Greetings, great to be with you.
Here we are, Rush Limbaugh.
I am fernally ensconced behind the prestigious golden EIB microphone here at the Distinguished Limbaugh Institute for Advanced Conservative Studies, this being the largest free education institution in the world, free or oppressed.
There are no graduates, there are no degrees from this prestigious institution because the education never stops.
Telephone number if you want to be on the program today, 800-282-2882.
And the uh email address is rush at EIB net.com.
You know, I was um stunned today, uh, ladies and gentlemen, watching Telemy.
Came in here, you know, I turn on the TV.
It's a it's a necessary evil.
Uh most of the time it's just drivel.
Now, what did I do with what you know?
This is this is crazy.
I just I just organized this stuff mere moments ago.
Anyway, I was watching PMS NBC.
I was I was literally stunned by what I saw.
We did a morning update today in which I plainly stated and predicted that the drive-bys would show us no pictures of 9-11.
And PMS NBC All Morning has been running at the exact time it aired uh six years ago, or is it yeah, six years ago.
NBC's coverage of the attacks of the World Trade Center and the Pentagon.
They've been running that coverage from six years ago, uninterrupted all morning long.
I I am stunned.
I I'm glad they did it.
It's too bad nobody saw it because it's PMS NBC.
But uh I think I think one of the one of the problems that we have in the country here today is in the you know people complain about the lack of unity and so forth, is that we have um we've been allowed to forget it.
We've not re been reminded of the images.
Uh Pearl Harbor was an entirely different thing.
Uh we kept being reminded of that, and it kept us energized and outraged.
It's like today.
You know, I've we've we're gonna get to some uh sound bites from the Petraeus hearings before the Senate and the House yesterday, as we spent a lot of time yesterday doing uh as well.
The Democrats are just over the top.
You know, I I think the way to look at these people, you remember how Joseph McCarthy was shut down, and they clearly are the new McCarthyites, as is moveon.org.
And it was this uh it was a it was a Pentagon lawyer, wasn't a Democrat, it was a Pentagon lawyer or somebody, State Department lawyer, who finally said of Joseph McCarthy, have you have no decency, sir?
Have you not a shred of decency?
Uh and I'll tell you the Democrats just are exhibiting none, folks.
I yesterday I was searching in frustration.
If you were here yesterday, you know of my controlled rage.
Uh led to a hot show, there's no question about it.
One of the uh all-time greats will be in the archives for many, many moons.
However, I was looking for a word to describe what I uh and there, you know, the the fewer words you can you can use to make a point, the more powerful the point.
Brevity is the soul of wit, William Shakespeare.
And I just I I I it finally hit me.
There's just no decency.
After watching some more of the stuff that happened yesterday afternoon, the stuff uh happening in the Senate this morning, there's just no decency among these people.
It it's vulgar, it is indecent, it is unseemly, and it is certainly not helpful.
Uh today we get another tape from Osama bin Laden.
By the way, I don't know if you've noticed this or not, ladies and gentlemen.
I have, because I actually turn the sound up to watch some of this stuff.
I don't normally do that.
You read closed captioning, and I have noticed that the cable news networks, not so much Fox, but the c they do it graphically, but the cable news networks are pronouncing his name Usama.
Now I wonder if if that is to avoid any comparisons with Obama.
When did this Usama stuff start?
Now, Fox has been graphically spelling his name as Usama bin Laden with a U at the beginning of the word, but uh but the the pronunciation of his name is Usama bin Laden.
That's new, is it not, Mr. Snertley?
Fairly, fairly new.
I mean fairly new to coincide with the uh the Democrat presidential primary.
Uh I I think, just guess.
Anyway, so we've got this new Usama bin Laden tape.
And in it, and he does this every 9-11.
He releases a video tape of one of the 19 hijackers on 9-11 uh with the so-called final testament.
And it was uh it was uh I forget which one doesn't matter.
Uh and this guy's going on and on and on about how you're gonna come at us from the front, from the back, from the left, from the right, from the up, from the down.
So around it was last year's tape.
Well, whatever.
This year's it's gonna be more of the same.
We're gonna hunt you down, we're gonna kill you, you infidels, you dirty, rotten, filthy pigs, goats, chickens, whatever, we're gonna we're gonna wipe you out.
Um on the day that this is released, you have these indecent, vulgar Democrats.
Essentially.
I mean, uh, this is this is uh it's hard to say, but it's obvious.
On the day this this testament comes out, this hijacker and Usama and everybody gloating about their achievement and their promise for more.
You've got Democrats in the United States Senate, who are sounding more like they are interested in advancing Usama bin Laden's cause than the general who is trying to defeat Usama's boys in Iraq.
Now, General Petraeus more than held up his hand as you will hear on the audio sound bites that will be coming up later on in the uh in the program.
Before we get to that, I'm gonna discuss Mrs. Clinton giving back the 850 grand to uh Norman Shue.
Because ah, the drive-bys.
The drive-by is they're just marveling.
Mrs. Clinton, oh, how clean and pure is the wind-driven snow.
You wait till you hear Andrea Mitchell.
We have a couple of audio sound bites on this.
And she had to do it, of course, because Obama uh is is uh is is raising so much money.
Barack Obama is raising so much money if it she had to do this to keep up.
So she's being praised, uh, ladies and gentlemen, for giving back the 850 grand.
But has anybody noticed what I have noticed?
Two things.
Giving it back to who?
We don't know who the donors were, other than the poor paw family out there from California, the bunch with a lot of pets but no money.
Uh and we don't know where this money's being sent back.
We were also told that 26,000 of it originally went to charity.
I want to see proof of this.
I want to see the cancel check.
I want to I want to see the evidence.
I want to I you know it's easy to say I gave 26,000 dollars of it a charity.
To whom?
Well, I don't recall.
I'm uh surprised by your question.
You don't trust no, I don't I want to know who you gave the money to, and I want to know where this 850 grand went.
And did any of it go back to China, ladies and gentlemen.
You do you realize how many people pled guilty or fled the jurisdiction in the 1996 scandals, 96 and 98, with uh with Bill Clinton?
So that's that's my large question uh uh about the uh 850 grand.
And by the way, Howard Wolfson, uh, who is Mrs. Clinton's spokesman, uh said, hey, the donors can they can redonate the money if they if they choose to.
Well, I wonder what the hell is going to happen.
I think the m why even send it back?
The drive-bys are not gonna be uh investigating this, they're not gonna be examining this.
Uh people have been asking me to ask me yesterday and last night, what are you gonna do on uh 9-11?
Uh you know, I remember back on that day, I was flying to Omaha for a golf tournament.
Turned out to be the last charity charity golf tournament that Warren Buffett uh put on.
And I left here uh South Florida about 8 a.m., I believe.
Something like that.
Um we got uh we got a phone call aboard the plane around 9.30, uh 945, saying uh you gotta turn around, you've got to get back, you've got you got 90 minutes to get where you're going, and if you don't get there put down in 90 minutes, the air traffic control was clearing the skies.
And uh what happened?
Well, the World Trade Center's been hit.
Kidding, but we had no pictures up there at the time.
I did have Direct TV on the plane.
This is why, by the way, I broke down and decided to put DirecTV on plane.
Sorry for the self-absorption, ladies and gentlemen.
It's a personal story, however, and it's relevant to events of the day.
So we landed at some um out of the way place near Orlando, rented a car, flight attendant Jody drove me back here to the uh to the hangar where my car was.
It wasn't till two o'clock that I saw pictures of what had happened.
Uh and I, you know, was just was just stunned, and and I I uh I remember I got here behind the golden EIB microphone, maybe for half hour, 45 minutes.
And the next day, on September 12th, after having uh a night to think about it, one of the things that I concluded was that the worst thing we could do would be to shut down the country every 9-11, because that's what they tried to do.
I remember saying to you on this program that uh what were those almost 3,000 people at the World Trade Center in the Pentagon doing at that time that morning were going to work.
I think we can get uh too self-absorbed, if you'll pardon the use of the term, with constant memorials that shut down everything.
I don't go ahead and memorialize it as we are, but don't stop going to work.
Don't stop making the country work.
Don't let this every year shut down the United States of America.
Uh that's what keeps America working is Americans working, and that's what we all need to keep doing.
But here's what I do uh want to ask you to do today, and this is something you can do yourself.
You don't you we don't need to spend a whole lot of time here on the radio reliving it in order for you to be able to accomplish this.
I want you to take, especially with what is happening in the country today and around the world, the threats that we uh are faced with.
Take just a few seconds and recall how you felt on that day when you first saw pictures, or when you first heard uh what had happened.
Uh you know, we usually don't want to dwell uh in feelings.
We like to deal in thoughts here at the EIB network, but this is an exception.
Uh because I think we've lost the feeling.
I think the feeling uh has, and naturally so.
I mean, these are not the kind of feelings you want to revisit.
These are not the kind of feelings you want to stew in.
I think you should, though.
Think you should take your time whenever you have time today.
Just think back to how you felt.
I don't care what the feeling was.
Shock, sorrow, disbelief, uh, anger, desire for immediate reciprocity.
Uh I think the whole country needs to be yanked back into the memory of how we all felt that day.
How scared, how helpless, how stunned, and how shocked, and how sad and how mad everyone was as the event unfolded right before our eyes.
Uh, this is one bad memory that we need to keep as a bad memory and never forget it.
If we are to deal with these people who perpetrated this act uh effectively in the future.
A brief timeout.
We will continue here on the EIB network right after this.
The views expressed by the host on this show, documented to be almost always right, 98.7% of the time.
It's great to have you with us today.
800-282-2882.
Let's go to the audio sound bites.
As I said, I want to start with Mrs. Clinton and uh fundraising, and then we're gonna move into the drive-by's desperate to find out why we haven't gotten bin Laden.
I will give you the answer to why we don't have bin Laden.
First, on Sunday night.
This is the big uh this is the big uh uh what was this?
This is the the the uh Univision debate or the the the it was the Democrat Spanish debate.
I don't know what network was on.
Was it Univision?
I, ladies and gentlemen, was watching football.
Uh Didn't bother watching this, so it came as a bit of a shock to me that Mrs. Clinton trashed me.
Uh in this debate.
Well, not it's not a shock.
I mean because it happens all the time, but I I didn't hear about it till the next day.
Here is uh question from moderator Maria Elena Salinas.
Senator Clinton, a negative tone of the immigration debates left the country polarized and has created certain racists and discriminatory attitudes toward Hispanics.
Well, I think this is a very serious problem.
And as I said earlier, there are many in the political and frankly in the broadcast uh world today who take uh a particular aim at our Latino population, and I think it's very destructive.
You know, I tell you, these people have done their best.
They shoot at me constantly.
Blame me for the Oklahoma City bombing now.
Hey, Rush, aren't you a little bit big for your britches here?
How do you know that she was talking about you?
Well, because of the New York Times.
Uh uh, the uh spokesman for Mrs. Clinton after the debate.
Well, who who was she talking about here?
Uh political and frankly the broadcast world.
And the spokesman said after the debate she was furring uh referring to Lou Dobbs at CNN and radio host Rush Limbaugh.
Naturally, I hear that she's got a problem with broadcasters, and who else is there that she's going to be concerned or worried about?
By the way, uh it's silly to have to defend this.
The illegal immigration is not about anything but American culture.
Nothing to do with racism or anti-Latino or anti-Hispanic.
That's just how the Democrats want to play it.
This is Pander Pander Pander, but ladies and gentlemen, to illustrate.
I mean, anybody can claim anything.
Anybody can say anything, but I want to demonstrate here my uh uh uh lack of uh prejudice and bias.
I am going to play for you illegal immigrants in this audience.
What Mrs. Clinton said with the Spanish translation.
Yo creo que es un problema muy serio.
Como dije anteriormente, hay muchísimas personas en la parte política y en el mundo de los medios de comunicación que también se afincan con la población latina como blanco.
Y creo que eso es muy destructivo.
¿Cómo está?
We being see, I, ladies and gentlemen, hardly a racist at all, just exhibited max fairness here, making sure the illegal immigrants in the audience could understand what Mrs. Clinton was uh was saying.
All right, Mrs. Clinton.
Uh by the way, uh, it's not just Mrs. Clinton that Norman Shue was giving a lot of money to.
He gave a lot of money to Ubama.
Uh Barack Obama as uh as well.
Uh and both both Hillary and Obama claim that they want disclosure of bundlers and their cash hauls.
They both voted for disclosure of future bundlers like Norman Shue last month.
But when it comes to Norman Shue, they're stonewalling.
They're not released or say they can't release actually records that would provide media a roadmap to shoe's friends and what they might have wanted.
And this is a this is folks, it's it's right out of the twilight zone.
This is a repeat uh of uh 96.
You know, 1996 and 2008 in the Chinese calendar are both years of the rat.
And something does stink here.
Her refusal to reveal her donor information just invites all these comparisons to back in 1996.
Johnny Chung, remember these names here?
James Riotti, John Huang, Charlie Tree.
There were twenty-two people in all who pleaded guilty after the 1996 scandal.
And it seems like the Clintons are trying to repeat history.
Whenever they get in money troubles, they seem to go to Asia.
They seem to go to China.
Now, Mrs. Clinton is getting all kinds of praise here.
In fact, by the way, the LA Times had a fascinating story.
Uh donors' business under FBI scrutiny and investment pool run by Norman Shu raised profits and questions.
This C LA Times, listen, listen to a couple of quotes here.
One investor, quote unquote, said that she made donations to Clinton via Shu solely to stay in Shu's good graces.
And she knew others who did so as well.
They knew they had to do it or they were out, said the investor, who acts to remain anonymous.
There were people who who maxed out every credit card they had to give the maximum 4600 dollars in donations.
She said she opposed Clinton's presidential bid, but she gave money to her campaign anyway.
I can't stand the woman, the investor said.
So here's just one story.
It's anecdotal, but she's being uh uh making it clear that she was forced into this for fear of retribution uh uh from Norman Shue.
Then the AP story here, Senator Hillary Rodham, Clinton's presidential campaign.
Uh by the way, she didn't say it.
The campaign said it.
The campaign now has the human ability to talk, do you know, just like the White House.
Um the campaign said Monday it will return $850,000 in donations raised by Norman Shue.
Uh and oh, they're gonna vigorously review their fundraisers in the future.
They're gonna really vet these people.
Now, folks, I'm from Missouri.
Uh, and the the campaign's gonna have to show me uh where this money went.
They're not telling us who the donors are, and that's the key, and they're not telling us where this money is being returned to.
And as somebody from Missouri need to show me.
As usual, my friends, half my fertile brain tied behind my back.
Just to make it fair.
L Rushball, the all-knowing, all caring, all sensing, all feeling, all concerned.
All everything.
Maha Rushi here at the Excellence in Broadcasting Network.
Speaking of more this uh this 400 and whatever it is, 850, 850, 860,000 in donations from Norman Shue to uh to uh Mrs. Clinton.
She's gonna send it back.
You know, uh you you have to figure that it's either gonna go back to Shue or it's gonna go back to the people he bundled.
In which case, one of the people that he bundled was this this family from Daily City, California.
I keep talking about the mail carrier.
Um the Paw family.
Ma and Paw Paw.
Lots of pets, no money, makes 45,000 a year, but in two years the family donated 244,000 to the Clinton camp.
Well, to the Democrats, and I think 55 or 60,000 of it went to uh Mrs. Clinton.
Now you would think that these people are gonna go to their mailbox one day this week and they're gonna get a huge amount of money in their mailbox.
If this this is the one, you know, I want to know, folks.
I want to know who these donors are, and she's not saying, and neither is Obama.
Uh Barack Obama.
Uh and I don't know if uh if uh Mr. and Mrs. Paul and their children, uh the paw kids will be allowed to keep the money.
They get they donated it.
It's gonna stop.
They donate.
This is this yeah, you gotta hear how the drive-by's are dealing with this.
Andrea Mitchell marvels here at uh the at the smart Clinton Inc.
uh dumping the shoe money on the eve of 9-11 and the Petraeus testimony.
He's on with Joe Scarborough today, and he said, My gosh, this Hillary Clinton story just continues to move like a freight train going from Los Angeles to Chicago.
This is one of the biggest refunds in political campaign history.
Clearly they figured out that there is likely criminality involved in this on the part of the champion.
That's not that what they discovered this likely criminality that's gonna be found.
Uh to say that the c the Clintons have discovered criminality is to like is like saying Newton discovered gravity.
The bundler, Norman Shu and some of the contributors, not the campaign itself.
And they're trying to get out in front of it.
Of course, they released this at night quietly on uh the eve of 9-11 and the day of the Petraeus report.
So you have to think that the smart folks over at uh Clinton Central figured this would not get very much attention.
Yeah, the smart folks over Clinton sent Oh, how we marvel at the brilliance of the Clintons, ladies and gentlemen.
The drive by they j they just they they just bear them, they just undress and say, please do me.
Yes, Mr. Sturdle, uh she's she doesn't know what Mr. Snurdley's question, the official program observer, uh says, How does Andrea Mitchell know that the Clintons are not involved in this for a certainty?
Uh very simple.
I'm surprised that you would ask such a question.
The answer is, I'm sure if Andrea were here, she'd say, because the Clinton team told her.
The Clinton team told her.
They don't doubt the Clintons.
I mean, the Clintons are oracles.
The Clintons are the gods of the Democrat Party.
So Scarborough says, well, they knew what was going on, the Clintons did.
Now obviously Barack Obama is her is her challenger.
Would we expect Barack Obama to come out and attack her on this fundraiser, or is he concerned about his own Chicago fundraisers?
Barack Obama's political action committee accepted money from Norman Shue in previous years, not in this presidential campaign, but before he was a presidential candidate.
This was when Hillary Clinton was desperately trying to camp to compete with Barack Obama to draw in the most money, and actually she lost in that round to Barack Obama in this recent campaign cycle.
And they were just taking money from wherever they could get it.
Oh yeah, that's it.
That was just as innocent as it could be.
Obama was mounting a challenge that Mrs. Clinton wasn't prepared for, had to go out there, just get the money wherever they could.
Whatever Democrats have to do to win, folks, you have to understand the drive-by media narrative and template as such, so whatever they have to do to win is fine.
We don't question it.
You think the coverage of this would be anywhere similar if this were, say, um Rudy or Mitt Romney?
I mean, they'd be they'd be delving into Norman Shue's religion.
Is this guy a Mormon convert?
You know, they'd be doing all kinds of they wouldn't be stopping, they wouldn't even be paying attention to Petraeus.
They yeah, yeah, they they with Rudy, they'd be is there a mob ties in this money?
Is that why Rudy is giving it back?
Where's this money going, the drive-byes would say.
Um and of course with uh Fred Thompson is it lobbyist money?
We're gonna find the roots of this if Fred Thompson's being forced to give back eight hundred and fifty or sixty thousand with Mrs. Clinton, it's just wow.
Are they not sharp?
They saw what happened and they knew they had to get rid of this money and they did it the night of Petraeus' testimony, whoa, they are really smart over there at uh at Clinton Inc.
Let's go to the phones.
People have been patiently waiting.
We'll go to the Bronx, we'll start with Bob.
Glad you called, sir, and welcome to the EIB network.
Hello, Rush.
Yes.
Uh I I was just uh just flashing back I I was actually two blocks away from uh from the World Trade Center uh when it went down.
I watched it uh from a consulting job right through the windows, and again, the horrific, horrific uh scene it was.
Uh but I I I I just can't uh believe when I listened to the Hillary Clintons of the world and all of the other uh so-called wannabe presidents, that they would uh they would have any question that what Mr. Bush did here was the right and only way to proceed to retaliate against this evil empire.
Uh well then if you if you um if you have that opinion, then you and I look I'm being facetious here.
Yeah, but but you obviously don't understand their political uh objectives.
Uh they have a narrative, they have a they have an objective, and it's purely political, and it's it's got far more importance to them than national security does.
I mean, look at the people you're talking about are actively trying to secure the defeat of the U.S. military here.
And I think I I'll tell you what, that that's you know, 9-11 comes around and I said I at the beginning of the program, I don't want to spend a whole lot of time in memorial on this.
I want you to reflect on it personally with your feelings.
I gotta tell you something, folks.
Um it's a hell of a day for the Democrats to be urging defeat up on Capitol Hill.
We've we've we've got a couple sound bites coming in addition to our regular roster here of Barbara Boxer today, you will not believe.
Uh just indecent and vulgar.
Now, once again, here you have this four-star general in full military dress, being accused of being a liar.
Being told he's a Patsy.
Even after his testimony yesterday.
But if if I'll tell you something, you know, let's let's put the the when a rubber meets a road here, let's let's challenge these Democrats.
If he's lying, isn't it time for a court martial?
If General Petraeus is lying and is a Patsy and is simply engaging in a political process here above and beyond what his charge is, can't they suggest that there be charges brought against him for misleading the Congress, lying to Congress?
You know, there is a very, very strict law.
You lie to Congress and you are in deep doo doo.
It's it's it's worse than a hate crime.
You lie to Congress and they will come after you.
They've got if if they claim he's lying, let's see the proof.
Let's hear their experts.
Let's find out, you know, these these these Democrats in both the House and the Senate, both these committees, they are the military experts of the world.
They're the ones that know how to fight the enemy.
They're the ones that know how to defeat an enemy.
Don't make me choke.
These are the people who know how to give up.
These are the people who know how to quit.
These are the people, I'm going to say this again.
They are trying to rerun the the uh the uh rock war as Vietnam.
They are trying to cast this administration as the Nixon administration.
That is what they're trying to do.
And for them to be doing this on the sixth anniversary of the World Trade Center in the Pentagon being hit by uh uh Usama bin Laden's 19 hijackers.
How tone deaf must they be?
How uh you know, one thing you can do with Democrats, this is a projection.
It's called in psychiatric terms.
Uh the Democrats are accusing Petraeus of being a patsy.
The Democrats are accusing him of lying.
I've uh suggested to you that if you ever, because I, you know, I'm I'm talented here, folks.
I can read the stitches on the fastballs.
I can see between the lines.
I know I know these people like every square inch of my glorious naked body, and I am telling you that when they say Petraeus is lying, it means they are.
When they say that Petraeus is a puppet, they are.
And I'll tell you who's pulling their strings.
Move on.org and that that contemptible, indecent ad that ran yesterday in the New York Times.
Uh the kook fringe left wing blogosphere.
That's who they're afraid of.
Uh they're not afraid of Obama, uh Usama.
They are not afraid of uh the enemy.
They're afraid of Fox News.
Uh they're afraid of me, and they are afraid of their kook, insane lunatic uh left wing supporters.
And who are these people?
Well, in the case of moveon.org, move on.org is basically a, and it's a small grunge of people.
I mean, they try to make themselves sound like they're millions strong with all their donations.
But the people running that show over there are basically a bunch of elitists who hold every American in contempt.
And in fact, I would go so far as say Ralph Peters wrote about this today in the New York Post, and I would agree with it what he said.
Uh these are people who are not even interested in you voting because you don't have a sense to do that.
They want to anoint the people they think should be running the country.
You don't have the sense to get out of the way of anything.
You don't have the sense to make the right decisions in life.
You don't have the sense to vote right, as evidenced by the last two elections.
These are pure totalitarians, and that's who's pulling the strings of these Democrats in the House and the Senate.
They are the ones who are puppets.
They are the ones who are lying.
They are the ones who don't have a policy or a strategy for victory, just the opposite.
Learn it, love it, live it.
Hi, welcome back, Rush Limbaugh.
As always, having more fun than a human being should be allowed to have, as your highly trained broadcast specialist.
I want to ask you, you guys remember this was a short, oh, might have been a week, two weeks ago, could have been a month.
Time flies when you're having fun.
We always have fun here.
And I do remember that uh just a couple days ago, uh, I was uh I was in an sort of a uh intense conversation with an environmentalist wacko uh about alternative fuels.
And you remember I told you, I don't know how long ago, it's very recently, I said, you watch before it's all said and done.
The alternative fuel source that we're gonna discover out there for propulsion is gonna be water.
Remember that?
And I told this environmentalist wacko, I said, you think we're gonna be able to fly airplanes with wind farms and solar panels, you got anything coming.
This environmental is going nuts on me on oil and how it's polluting we've got to stop using it.
It's as natural as your hairspray.
In fact, it's probably more natural than your hairspray.
Well, guess what?
And I told this just two days ago to this environmentalist wacko.
I said some American sitting in his basement, utilizing the unique freedom and creativity that we Americans have is gonna come up with a way to make water usable to produce hydrogen and propulsion.
Lo and behold, radio frequencies help burn salt water.
An eerie uh Pennsylvania cancer researcher has found a way to burn salt water, a novel invention being touted by one chemist as the most remarkable water science discovery in a century.
John Cansius happened upon the discovery accidentally when he tried to desalinate seawater with a radio frequency generator he developed to treat cancer.
He discovered that as long as the salt water was exposed to the radio frequencies, it would burn.
The discovery has scientists excited by the prospect of using salt water, the most abundant resource on earth, as a fuel.
Rustum Roy, Penn State University chemist, has held demonstrations at his State College Pennsylvania lab to confirm his own observations of radio frequencies act to weaken the bonds between the elements that make up salt water, releasing the hydrogen.
Once ignited, the hydrogen will burn as long as it is exposed to the frequencies.
This discovery, the most remarkable in water science of 100 years, and I told this environmentalist wacko, I say, you know what's going to happen?
If if if we ever do discover a way to make all the water on this planet provide pretty much the same energy that oil does, you are going to say we're depleting the oceans and we can't use it.
And you're going to give us predictions about how in 35 or 40 years the oceans are going to be depleted.
And I'm going to say back to you, no, because they're melting up there in the North Pole.
And for every bit of the salt water we use, there's ice melting from glaciers and so forth.
So it's going to replenish itself.
We're saved, folks.
We're saved.
Radio once again saves the day.
Radio frequencies happen to be that which will ignite seawater.
Now, naturally, this is in its early stages, ladies and gentlemen.
All right, let's go back to the audio sound bites.
We're going to get to more of your phone calls, the Petraeus sound bites in the next hour.
Um you hear these two Barbara Boxer bits.
I don't want to play them out of uh out of rotation here.
Uh they were uttered by her mere moments ago, but I'll tell you something.
One of the one of the things that, as you listen to these as they come up in the next hour, one of things I want you to recall, or keep in mind, is that these words are disgusting, and they are vulgar and they are indecent.
But the most amazing thing is, Boxer Carey, Biden, I don't care who you're going to hear.
They act as if their words have no consequences.
On 9-11, the sixth anniversary, they act as though what they are saying about their country and about our abilities in Iraq and about their desire to lose in Iraq have no consequences.
With people our allies, with uh the Iraqis themselves, with the enemy.
The hubris, the arrogance here exhibited by these people and the danger at the same time will uh will startle you.
Brief time out.
Much more ahead after this.
Hi, welcome back.
I'm gonna violate my own rule, ladies and gentlemen.
I I've got to play you this one barber boxer soundbite.
This is the second of two lecturing General Petraeus today before the Senate committee.
Please, General, I ask you, please don't do what you did in 2004 when you painted a rosy scenario in an op-bed piece turned out to be wrong, like you did in 05 when you told us, and we believed you that the Iraqis were just about there.
They were going to take over their own defense.
And please consider that others could be right.
The Brits, General Casey, controller general, Lee Hamilton, and Tom Kane, who just wrote in an op-ed piece that our presence in Iraq is recruiting terrorists for Al-Qaeda.
Listen to the Iraqi people, the American people, the majority of the Congress.
Now, you might say, where does this woman get off?
Well, she's a United States Senator.
She's elected, she can say what she wants, but she's acting like her words have no consequence.
They all voted for this guy in unanimity.
They confirmed him.
Why I didn't know they had all these problems with him.
And here's the thing.
I asked you a moment ago, put yourself in the position of asking yourself, do these people think their words have any consequences?
And to me, I'll tell you the best way to characterize this, it sounds to me like Barbara Boxer and others that you will hear in the next hour, are auditioning for roles in the next video released by Osama bin Laden.
▲
Export Selection