All Episodes
Previous Next
Aug. 9, 2007 - Rush Limbaugh Program
34:15
August 9, 2007, Thursday, Hour #3
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
The views expressed by the host on this show make more sense than anything anybody else out there happens to be saying.
The views expressed by the host on this show, not necessarily those of the staff management nor sponsors of this station.
But they probably are.
Documented to be almost always right 98.7% of the time now, ladies and gentlemen.
A programming note, just to remind you, I will be here tomorrow, completing a full broadcast week.
I will be here.
If you want to be on the program, 800-282-2882 and the uh email address rush at EIB net.com, a story out of Madison, Wisconsin.
A diapered monkey.
A monkey wearing a diaper allegedly bit a young woman on the thumb yesterday outside a state street bar.
The small black and white monkey, 12 to 18 inches tall with a long tail, bit the woman around 1 a.m.
Uh in front of uh State Street Bratz, and then the monkey ran off.
Uh police spokesman said the monkey was still on the lamb.
This guy was in the beer garden at State Street Bratz letting women pet his monkey.
Said the cop, adding that the uh 20-year-old victim attempted to do so.
And uh the monkey bitter.
She uh suffered four puncture marks to her thumb, two on the top and two on the bottom, which that kind of makes sense if you get bit by a monkey, because it's got upper teeth and lower teeth.
It's amazing what you learn in these stories written by the drive-by media.
Police today were able to contact a monkey's owner, lives in a second-story state street apartment.
The uh police spokesman said animal control officer being called in to quarantine the monkey for observation to make sure it's not Oh, they found it.
Says here it ran off.
They said a monkey was still on the lamb.
Then they said we're being called into quarantine, or maybe they haven't found the monkey yet.
They did find a monkey.
I was gonna say, how do you miss a monkey in a diaper?
Okay.
I had to really struggle with whether or not to even report that story, because it's just too tempting.
You know, with FCC regulations the way they are, it is just too tempting.
I got a note here from uh our official climatologist, Roy Spencer, University of Alabama at Huntsville.
He is a um uh a genuine scientist and has been doing some research, and he released the research today in geophysical research letters, and he has had no inquiries on this from anybody in the drive-by media.
The research is actually very interesting.
The widely accepted, albeit unproven theory that man-made global warming will accelerate itself by creating more heat-trapping clouds, is challenged this month in a new research in new research from the University of Alabama at Huntsville.
Instead of creating more clouds, individual tropic warming cycles that served as proxies for global warming, actually saw a decrease in the coverage of heat trapping cirrus clouds, says Dr. Spencer, principal research scientist at uh U.A. Huntsville's Earth Systems Science Center.
This was not what he expected to find.
All the leading climate models forecast that as the atmosphere warms, there should be an increase in high-altitude cirrus clouds.
For those of you in Rio Linda, those are clouds that look like feathers up there.
So as as as the atmosphere warms, there should be an increase in high atmosphere cirrus clouds.
That increase would amplify any warming caused by man-made greenhouse gases.
That amplification would be called f positive feedback.
What we found in month-to-month fluctuations of the tropical climate system was a strongly negative feedback.
In other words, as the tropical atmosphere warms, cirrus clouds decrease.
That allows more infrared heat to escape the atmosphere To outer space.
Which, my layman's observation, would mean that the Earth has its own built-in cooling system.
Ladies, how amazing would that be?
That the Earth has its own built-in uh cooling system.
To give an idea of how strong this enhanced cooling mechanism we found is, if it was operating on global warming, it would reduce estimates of future warming by over 75%.
Until we understand how precipitation systems change with warming, I don't believe we can know much of our current warming is man-made.
Without that knowledge, we can't predict future climate change with any degree of certainty, said Spencer.
He and his colleagues expect these new findings to be controversial.
No, Dr. Spencer, expect them to be ignored.
I know some climate modelers will say that these results are interesting, but they probably don't apply to long-term global warming.
But this represents a fundamental natural cooling process in the atmosphere.
Let's see if climate models can get this part right before we rely on long-term projections.
So this is uh groundbreaking recent.
He didn't expect to find this.
And uh no inquiries from the drive-by media.
And there probably won't be.
Uh you you've heard um, in fact, hey, Mike, I want you to grab something.
I just thought of this.
Uh uh Zell Miller, governor of Georgia, uh singing Wolverton Mountain, and then all those songs about how they want to improve the uh the brain power of uh George's uh babies and so forth.
And you uh I know you know what I'm talking about out there.
You look it up at our in our archival profit system, there should be relatively easy to find.
I can see him.
I got a camera up there where he is, and I can see him feverishly.
Uh fact, I'll wait for you to find that, and I'll do this next story after you have found it.
In the meantime, Homo erectus.
Okay, he got it.
Here's the story.
Recordings.
Nobody's Homo erectus.
Whoa, what's that about?
Sit tight, folks.
Just stick with me on this.
And we'll get that back up for you in just a second.
Recordings that claim to stimulate baby brain development may actually slow vocabulary development in infants if they are overused, according to researchers on Wednesday.
They have tried this in Georgia, ladies and gentlemen.
They actually did that in Georgia.
They put together a CD that would give away with music that was stimulate the growth of these young infants' brains, and now there's federal research that says it doesn't happen.
For every hour per day spent watching baby DVDs and videos and listening to this stuff, infants between eight and sixteen months understood an average of six to eight fewer words than babies who did not watch the videos or listen to the music, said Frederick Zimmerman at the University of Washington.
Uh, older toddlers were not harmed or helped by these audios or videos.
Uh, the most important fact to come from this study is that there's no clear evidence of a benefit coming from baby DVDs and videos and so forth, and there's some suggestion of harm.
Uh the bottom line is uh the more a child watches baby DVDs and videos, the bigger the effect.
The amounting of viewing, amount of viewing does not matter.
Libs.
Oh, I know she was huge.
Jane Fonda was huge.
Big on this.
But I mean, this is just parents and caretakers are the baby's first and best teachers.
They instinctively adjust their speech, their eye gaze, and their social signals to support language acquisition.
Watching attention getting DVDs in TV may not be an even swap for very warm social human interaction at this young age.
Old kids may be different, but the youngest babies seem to learn language best from people.
This is from uh Andrew Meltzoff, a psychologist who worked on the uh study.
Isn't it amazing, ladies and gentlemen, what they actually what these liberals learn?
It's just amazing that babies do better uh with mom and dad, and they learn to talk better from being around actual human beings uh than from uh audio and video recordings.
Isn't it amaz?
Why who would have ever fought to investigate this were it not for uh these liberals, who um always have a better way than nature.
They just always have a better because we are just so busy screwing it all up, aren't we?
We'll be back.
All right, here we go.
Homo erectus is how the story I got interrupted on uh begins.
Homo erectus, uh, long viewed as a crucial evolutionary link between modern humans and uh our tree-dwelling ancestors, may have been more ape-like than previously thought, ladies and gentlemen.
This, according to scientists unveiling newfound fossils.
Uh revealing an ancient skull and a jawbone from two early branches of the human family tree, Homo erectus and homo habilis.
A team of Kenyan scientists said that they were surprised to find that early female hominids were much smaller than males.
The skull was the first discovery of a female homo erectus.
It suggests mankind's upright ancestors may have been physiologically closer to modern gorillas and chimpanzees.
What's I always thought that was a case?
I never thought we came from baboons.
I always thought we came from apes.
I mean, that's what that's what these I'm not saying I believe that.
I mean, this is what we've always been told.
Why is this news?
Well, maybe the chimpanzee part is new.
I've known some guys that look like chimpanzees.
Um that could be true.
Uh suggests mankind's upright ancestors may have been physiologically closer to modern gorillas and chimpanzees, which also exhibit big differences in size between males and females than had been supposed.
Um who's this uh this is uh Dr. Emma Emboua, one of the team, said this sexual um uh diamorphosis is uh considered a primitive character because it occurs in other apes.
She said this could also mean the sexual behavior of Homo erectus was more like that of apes.
Where individuals, especially males, mate with several partners, sometimes in a few hours, than that of its more monogamous human success.
Uh, the good old days.
Damn evolution.
Kip, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania.
Welcome to the EIB network.
Hello.
Uh hello, Rush.
Uh and major dittoes.
Uh the discussion regarding Sparta and uh the promotion of homosexuality.
I've been sitting here trying to find it uh in a copy of John Keegan's A History of Warfare.
I know somewhere in this book he goes into this, and I as I it's been about 15 years since I read it, so I'm going from memory.
But I do recall that that there was apparently one article that he could find that tried to promote this argument that the Spartans did this.
And as I believe uh if I recall correctly, Keegan debunked that article, and he also called into question the motives behind the authors that they were promoting.
Well, yeah, we for you know, I I that's the thing that these Abraham Lincoln was gay.
Uh okay, yeah, I guess.
Same kind of stuff.
You get somebody look at it doesn't get much to get the drive-by meeting to print something.
Uh you get an approved liberal group or even a fake liberal group that has an approved looking logo on a fax machine, put the release out and they'll run it.
Well, uh all I wanted to call and say was that that Keegan debunked this at least fifteen years ago.
Um and I think he liberally quotes Hansen in his book, too.
Yeah, I'll bet.
Well, I um I don't have a way of getting hold of Dr. Hansen, even as we speak, but I'm gonna try to do that uh because this I've never heard this before, and I've I've done a little reading and uh educating myself on the uh on the Spartans, and long before the movie 300 came out, uh, because I was I was fascinated uh when I first heard about that society and culture that they hadn't structured for themselves.
And I'd never heard a thing uh uh such as what Mike Ravel uh was out there saying.
But I don't know for sure, so that's why I have to um I have to rely on a noted scholar and expert in this field, such as Dr. Hanson.
Thanks for the call out there, Kip Santa Rosa, California.
This is Chris.
Uh appreciate your patience, sir.
Hey, Rush, Megadiddos from Reagan Country out here in California.
Thank you.
Hey, uh one question on the bridge collapse in uh Minnesota out there.
Um couldn't this couldn't we say that this is a fault of uh union labor?
Uh not to pick on those guys too much, but the lips keep saying that it was uh tax cuts or spending for the war that uh neglected the bridge.
But you know, this bridge was was built by union labor and it was maintained by the union guys.
You know, the government inspectors, they got to be part of a union, you know.
Couldn't we say that you know union labor could be a big deal?
I get your point.
I get your point, and it's a good point.
The knee-jerk reaction is something like this happens.
Oop, we're not paying enough taxes.
Bush is distracted, too much money going to Iraq, and then the everybody picks it up and becomes the mantra.
And you're right, hey, this thing failed for some reason.
Exactly.
So you know, I mean, not to pick on the union guys.
I know you've had a couple calls the past couple days, but often.
We're not taking a union guy.
You're making a you're making a a a rhetorical point here.
Yeah.
You're simply talking about why what were people's first initial reaction goes to.
First, we need more taxes.
Why are we spending too much money on Iraq and so why the government's not doing enough to maintain the bridges because it doesn't have the money because Bush cut taxes and blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.
So you're saying, hey, why couldn't we create just as another as as ridiculous, if you want to say, assumption before because we don't know yet.
Exactly.
All of these theories are ridiculous.
We don't know.
Exactly.
So we could go out and say, yeah, well, who built the damn thing and who was maintaining it?
Who was inspecting it?
I mean, I sort of did that the first day when I pointed out, isn't it strange how all these infrastructure disasters are happening in blue states and blue cities?
Right.
And if we find the body of Jimmy Hoffa in there as well, then hey, I think you know that's another uh piece to the puzzle that's well that's uh Jim Bridge is not as old as Jimmy Hoffa has been uh sucking concrete.
Well, it was worth a shot.
Uh true.
Anyway, Chris, I appreciate the call.
Thanks much.
Uh Detroit, Michigan.
This is Harriet.
You're next.
Hello.
Hi.
Hi.
The comment that I have is that uh you missed the point that the volunteer we have a volunteer army now.
And therefore the people that do join join because of the love of country and also the love of their family to keep them safe.
Wait, wait, wait, I'm confused.
What point did I miss?
Well, you're talking about loving the person in the fox hell with you.
Uh I thinnator Gravelle said that.
No, but I mean that's the point that you've been talking about.
And I'm saying you don't have to, and you don't have to send husband and wives together.
Because it's because of the family at home, because people love their country so much, that they are willing to go and protect us.
I I understand all of that.
I'm not making you know, you you don't think that I was being critical of our fighting forces, do you?
No, no.
I just think that that was uh point that you missed making.
No, no, no, no.
I thought making a larger point within a different context.
Mike Gravel said that the that the Spartans were not fighting for their country or their city.
They were fighting because they loved the man next to 'em.
Right.
And and the the servicemen do have great respect for the men that they're I know that what he was trying to the buddy system, we all know that exists in the military.
Right.
But you don't have to, you know, men can bond without becoming gay.
Oh, absolutely.
And and so that this is, you know, something these these clowns are totally missing in all this.
But that uh my only point in saying, well, hey, if that's what made Spartans such great warriors, then let's put men and women who husbands and wives and the foxholds.
We're just trying to illustrate the um uh should I say the futility of his argument.
Right.
No, I understand that, but I just thought maybe um, you know, your listeners, because uh a lot of people and uh especially on the other side of him to listen to you too, very often forget we have a volunteer army.
You know, they say, well, let President Bush's kids go or someone else has come.
Yeah, that's right.
You know, and they don't realize they're going for a reason.
I agree with you totally, Harry.
Well, I've I've uh they they love their country and they're and they're protecting their families.
This is how they those who joined have made the decision to do so.
We are in total agreement on this.
It's just that you don't know it or are not aware of it.
Which symbolizes countless years of problems that I have had.
Uh be right back today with us.
Moving right along in the fastest three hours in media.
I am your host, El Rushball meeting and surpassing all audience expectations on a daily basis.
Well, whites are now in the minority in nearly one in ten U.S. counties, and that increased diversity fueled by immigration and higher birth rates among blacks and Hispanics is straining race relations and sparking a backlash against immigrants in many communities.
Mark Mayor of the Population Reference Bureau, Washington based research agency said, Yeah, there's some cultural shock out there, but I think there's a momentum building and it's going to continue.
As of 2006, non Hispanic whites made up less than half the population in 303 of the nation's 3,001 counties.
This, according to figures from the Census Bureau.
Uh that they released today.
Non Hispanic whites were a minority in 262 counties in 2000, up from 183 in 1990.
The biggest changes were in Orleans Parish, Louisiana, home to New Orleans.
The share of non Hispanic whites in Orleans Parish grew from 27% in 2005 to 34% in 2006, while the share of blacks dropped from about 68% to 59%.
I thought more of them left than that.
Anyway, many of the nation's biggest counties have long had large minority populations, but that diversity is now spreading to the suburbs and beyond, causing resentment in some areas.
Now wait a second.
I thought it was not supposed to happen.
I thought diversity is what made America great.
I I thought I thought the diversity was what we were all supposed to strive for.
Diversity.
Diversity is the defining characteristic of American greatness.
This is what the Libs have been telling us.
So how can this be?
We are diversifying all hell and and it's causing resentment.
Actually, it is.
You know, we there was there was a uh uh just just well, because we have a survey on it.
Uh you want to know no, no, you we had research on this about a month ago.
I remember the story.
We'll have to go back to my cocoa find it in the archives of the website before the end of the program, because we did a story on this.
Uh somebody it was a guy, a liberal at at Harvard or Yale or something, who had done a re uh research project on diversity, and he thought it showed so bad that he wasn't gonna release it.
Because it was an election year, and he thought it would hurt Democrats and hurt liberals to release this.
Uh and uh so he did he was gonna try to massage his analysis of his research.
Uh we know that diversity is is is causing these and the liberals the his the dirty little secret this is exactly what they want to happen.
They want everybody roiled against each other.
They like it when there's racial strife because it gives the Jacksons and Sharptons a reason to exist and keeps the black vote up.
They love divisions between men and women, the feminists and all this, because it keeps people preoccupied at war with one another.
They love creating this kind of crisis.
They don't want tranquility.
They don't want calm seas.
They love there being giant waves out there throwing everybody all over the place.
If you doubt me, go back and explain to me why they were so hell-bent on having uh uh amnesty for twelve to twenty million illegals.
They the d the Democrats are the party of minorities, and keeping minorities poor and even continuing to call them minorities when they're no longer minorities.
It's uh, you know, minority equals victim, victim equals special treatment by the government.
Liberals run the government, they're in charge of what these people have and don't have, keep them just on the bare edges of existence.
Uh it's hideous.
This is exactly what they've wanted to happen all this time.
This guy does this story or does his research, his scholarly research, expecting to show how diversity is creating love and uh devotion and uh new uh peoples uh orienting themselves around strange cultures and coming together in one giant Kumbayani found just the opposite.
And didn't want to release it.
By the way, ladies and gentlemen, we have just received this urgent uh request from the Pentagon.
I was misinformed.
I thought that was in a Pentagon.
From a Democrat National Committee.
All right, uh, Jim in Glendale Heights, Illinois.
Welcome to the EIB network.
Uh hi, Brian.
Glad to talk to you.
I'm still laughing about that last little piece.
You want me to go somewhere else and give you some time to uh cover?
I I I think I've recovered.
Okay, good.
Yeah, you've been talking today about how the uh nineties were the hottest decade on record, according to the uh mythologists in uh the global warming group.
Uh I came across uh some writing from Christopher Horner.
Uh he's a senior fellow at the competitive enterprise institution.
Oh, yes, yes.
And uh he has put together a list of the top ten global warming myths, and uh his number nine on there is uh the nineteen nineties were the hottest decade on record, and he debunks it with several things, but one of the most important things he says is that uh in uh the early nineties several hundred reporting stations in the Soviet Union went down because of the collapse of the Soviet Union.
And uh obviously the Soviet Union is a pretty cold country, and if you lose all these reporting stations in the colder climates, you're gonna get a hotter reading.
So it's uh the collapse of the Soviet Union is global warming.
That that that that may indeed be true.
Uh that's a little hard to believe that they willingly did I mean if if the Soviet Union can you imagine the Soviet Union goes down, even the thermometers fail?
I mean apparently they couldn't afford to keep up the uh you know the reporting stations, and so they just uh Well what is the reporting station?
It's a little wood hut with a thermometer in there.
You just you send some uh Bolshevik in to read it.
You know, an email a result somewhere.
Now but it look it, even if that happened, even if that happened, why wouldn't they just take last year's average and and and factor it in?
Well, the his point in uh his to leave it out like that.
Yeah, well his his point in here is that that nobody everybody knows that, but nobody reports it.
See the you know okay.
Yeah, there certainly is and don't forget you you well, the story today about the uh the the the spike in nineteen eighty-eight and eighty-nine that NASA knows is incorrect and hasn't corrected.
Right.
Um that's that's a factor too.
All prove there's an agenda here.
So bottom line is 1998, folks, the reputed warmest year on record was not.
And the global warming scientists know it, are suppressing it because they're based they they need that as the benchmark uh to say that the next five or six years is gonna be outrageous, I mean, even hotter in 1998 when in fact the uh warmest year on record as established now is nineteen thirty-four, uh long before the modern era of uh global warming debates began.
Jim, thanks for the uh for the phone call.
Vienna, Virginia next.
This is Kevin.
Hello, sir.
This is uh Kevin and uh retired uh special forces sergeant major, and I wanted to comment on that Senator talking about the Spartan fighters.
You are a retired special forces sergeant Sergeant Major.
Yes, sir, I am.
I have I I I've been to where uh one of the places people like you trained, and I I'm I'm in awe.
Well, thank you, sir.
I I appreciate everything you do, and I believe you met with my uh seventh group sergeant major back then.
I've I've heard the story.
Sergeant Major Ivan Ivanov.
Sergeant Major Ivanov.
Yeah, I haven't told that story in a lot.
You you did you know him?
Yes, sir.
He was my group sergeant major many years ago.
Uh well, I'll tell I'll I'll have to tell that story again because it's hilarious.
It's hilarious.
Anyway, I know that's not what you called about.
No, sir.
I I wanted to talk about that senator talking about uh the the Spartans training uh with homosexuality for war.
The Spartans also had another uh tradition.
I don't know how true that is that one that the Senator uh quoted was, but they didn't know.
Well, I don't know either, but I do know this.
I do know this, Kevin, that whenever I want to know anything about history, I consult Mike Rebell.
That's true.
Yeah.
That's very true.
And what were they what else were they known for?
Well, the the tradition was that uh the the lawyer, the Spartan warrior, when he would leave home to go fight and go off the battle, the mother would give the shield uh to the son and basically say, uh come home with your shield or come home on it.
And when she means by come home on it, it means coming dead, they would carry him back on his shield.
And so that tells me that the the the Spartan warrior was also fighting for country and love of family and things like that.
And I and I believe that the senators getting the definition of of love wrong too.
He's disturbing it or twisting it because there's many different words, many different definitions for many different words.
Like if you take Spanish, they have caliente and calories both mean hot.
One for heat, one for spicy.
We in English have one word for hot, and it covers both.
Well, in Greek, and I'm I don't speak Greek, uh, but they have many different verbs, like four different verbs for love.
One for like amour, for love, like you know, amorous.
You know, you're in love with your your wife.
They have a love for another word for love, meaning love or respect for God or country, or another one for the brother, uh love for your brothers or or other men, the respect you have for other or fathers, fighters.
And he's misusing the w wrong verb for love when he's describing this.
I don't know that he's misusing it or he just doesn't know.
And I would opt for the latter.
Well, it's probably true.
He's twisted it for his own purposes.
Well, you know, so yeah, I got it.
You you are absolutely right about about different languages.
Um this is a funny story.
This is back in the eighties, and I was working in Sacramento, and uh one of the things the radio station did was have uh hosts like me uh sponsor trips to various places in the world, taking audience members who would pay for it, and the travel agency would advertise it, and it was uh I did uh did one to Italy and I did one to Hong Kong.
And the one in Italy, uh before I before I went, I said, I gotta go to the Hassler Hotel, because the Hassler Hotel was always on lifestyles of the rich and famous.
So I was what the big deal was.
So they had this rooftop restaurant, and then my brother was on a trip with his wife and a bunch of friends.
We got up there, and they wait or start services, and my brother, uh, instead of saying grazi, would say gratzate.
And these waiters would just start laughing, left or giggling amongst themselves, and went on for the whole meal, and as they kept laughing, my brother kept saying gratate, whenever they fill the water, whenever they brought something out for the table, gratate.
And we said, What does this mean?
He and he said, I don't know.
I'm just I just made it up.
So we finally asked on the way out, we finally waiters what what what was so funny about grass?
Well, that's a f that they this what they told us.
Uh sometimes that can mean uh really sincere thanks from one man to another.
Just like you were saying, there are different ways in in uh Greek language to express love and so forth.
Now I don't know if that's true, but that's what these waiters told us.
So they thought they start giggling amongst themselves that my brother was sending them some sort of a signal when he would just mess it around with the word grazi.
He had no clue what it was.
That's great.
Well, anyway, I appreciate your call.
I uh are you um are you did you say you're retired former specialist?
Yeah, you're retired specialist.
What are you doing now?
Uh I own my own business, sir.
I'm a consultant for the government on I I changed when I retired from the military.
Uh I I got into computers.
This is uh pre-uh September eleventh, and so I went from uh commando to computer geek.
Well, you've a wide and varied career then.
Well, I hope you're consulting the government to uh to get smaller.
Thanks much.
Great call.
We'll be back here in just a sec.
Oh, we and we bump into Tommy Tightpans here.
Tom Jones, not unusual.
All right, here's the story.
I knew I knew I was right about this.
Uh it's a John Leo column from January or uh June 27th.
We talked about it on this program on June 28th.
Harvard political scientist Robert Putnam, author of Bowling Alone, is very nervous about releasing his new research, and understandably so.
His five-year study shows that immigration and ethnic diversity have a devastating short and medium-term influence on the social capital, the fabric of associations, trust and neighborliness that create and sustain communities.
He fears that his work on the surprisingly negative effects of diversity will become part of the immigration debate, even though he finds that in the long run, people do forge new communities and new ties.
His study reveals that immigration and diversity not Only reduce social capital between ethnic groups, but also within the groups themselves.
Trust, even for members of one's own race, is lower.
Altruism and community cooperation rarer.
Friendships fewer.
The problem isn't ethnic conflict or troubled racial relations, but withdrawal in isolation.
He writes in colloquial language, people living in ethnically diverse settings appear to hunker down, that is to pull in like a turtle.
And so, you know, they do this story here, whites are now in the minority in nearly one in ten U.S. counties, and it talk about how the societies are being roiled where this is happening.
Yeah, it is true.
But it's not because of racism or anything like that.
It's it just people aren't choosing it.
You know, it's like anything else to do with liberalism.
They force all this stuff on us because we don't know what's best for ourselves.
So we gotta go do this.
We gotta have that done, we gotta get this tax raised and so forth.
So there you have it.
We'll re-link to John Leo's column on this research tonight at Rush Limbaugh.com.
Here is uh Russ in Port St. Lucie, Florida.
Hello.
Uh hi, Rush.
Uh to those uh Beneless since 88.
Thank you.
Um commenting on the on the bridge uh collapse.
Um I I saw where that bridge was built in the in the 1960s.
And back in the 1960s, those roads, most roads were built to uh emulate the New Jersey Turnpike, which was the biggest uh and best at the time built in the 50s.
And the maximum weight of trucks allowed on roadways back then was 40,000 pounds.
And today uh it has slowly creeped up to where the maximum weight is eighty thousand pounds.
Double.
And and a lot of truckers uh know how to get around that too, because they know where the waste stations are and so forth.
So uh no one ever mentions that.
I I just thought it was worth uh worth passing it on.
I appreciate that.
I had not heard that.
Nobody had had uh passed that uh bit of information on to me.
Um it's a nice try to blame the truckers here.
Everybody knows it's the SUVs.
All right.
Uh say all it took here was about three inches of rain in three hours to bring the nation's largest mass transit system to its knees.
It's yesterday morning in New York.
First thing I want to know is when did George Bush design the subways in New York?
And secondly, how come liberal politicians never ever get blamed or even questioned when you have an infrastructure failure like happened yesterday in New York?
See you tomorrow, folks.
Open line Friday.
▲
Export Selection