All Episodes
Previous Next
Aug. 1, 2007 - Rush Limbaugh Program
32:59
August 1, 2007, Wednesday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Hey, greetings to you, thrill seekers, music lovers, conversationalists all across the fruited plain.
A big day in the United States and the history of this country.
August 1st, 1988, this program debuted and witnessed and caused a sea change in American media.
No longer exists does the monopoly of the drive-by media.
And a story here from editor and publisher says that a Harris poll measuring the perceptions, public perceptions at 23 professions and occupations came out today.
Journalists are in the bottom 10.
Just 13% of the 1,100 U.S. adults surveyed in June and July said the occupation of journalism had very great prestige.
Only 13% said that.
16% said it had hardly any at all.
Journalists are at the bottom of the list of prestige jobs.
This was not the case in 1988 when this program started.
This is our 19th anniversary.
We're starting our 20th year today.
Great to have you with us.
The telephone number is 800-282-2882, and the email address is rush at EIBnet.com.
For all the news out there about how rotten men are.
A bunch of predators and so forth.
What's going on with the women in this country?
Wait till you hear this stack.
Oh, yes, you can shoot them and you get away with it, too.
That is actual audio, ladies and gentlemen, from a NAGS rally, a pro-choice rally on the mall in Washington in the early 90s, mixed with the Forrester sisters.
That's our feminist update.
All right.
This stack involving women in the news is incredible.
A Florida woman.
You've all seen this woman's picture on the news.
It's just, I mean, this is.
Florida woman accused of using aliases to adopt 11 New York children received as much as $2 million in child welfare payments even as she starved, bound, and abused them.
I didn't think this was possible.
I did not think women were capable of.
This is what I have been told as a man in my life in this country.
Only men do things like men are the predators.
Starved, bound, and abused them.
Investigators initially believed that Judith Leakin, 62, had adopted nine children, but authorities in New York said Tuesday she'd adopted 11 in all from New York City's foster care system between 93 and 96.
I keep hearing how hard it is to adopt babies in this country.
I keep hearing people have to leave the country to go adopt babies.
How does this woman do this?
Authorities believe that she held the adopted children like prisoners in her Port St. Lucie home.
It's just right up the road from here.
It's where the New York Mets train.
Spring training.
Often handcuffing them together, forcing them to soil themselves because they weren't allowed to use the bathroom.
And we're not talking for those of you in Rhea Linda about going out and rolling in the dirt.
It's abhorrent, said John Mattingly, commissioner of the New York City Administration for Children's Services.
She indicated she loved these children.
This is Leakin's lawyer denies the allegation.
She loves these children.
She took care of them.
She nurtured them and she fed them because they couldn't feed themselves.
They were in handcuffs.
According to, well, according to Children's Services Administration, Leakin used aliases to fraudulently adopt the children and has been receiving welfare payments at different addresses and bank accounts until her arrest in July.
$2 million over the years from New York child welfare agencies.
This case up in Maryland.
You know, this is just sick.
Investigators working on the case of a mother who allegedly hid several tiny bodies around her home have a daunting task ahead of them, both forensic and legal.
Even as the FBI and local searchers prepared Wednesday to finish a three-day search of 37-year-old Christy Freeman's home, the four sets of preterm remains already recovered pose dilemmas.
Investigators have to first determine whether all four bodies were the offspring of Freeman, who has four living children.
She's been charged in the death of one of the preterm infants, a 26-year-old fetus, discovered under her bathroom sink last week.
Then investigators need to find out how old the other preterm infants were when they died and whether Freeman or somebody else was responsible for their dying before birth, which is called an abortion.
See, the trick here is they've got to, if she did this, if she self-aborted these babies, buried them, did whatever prior to the third trimester, there's no crime here, folks.
There's no crime.
No, she's practicing women's liberation.
Abortion has been preached to women as an act of liberation.
Pregnancy is a form of servitude and can even be a disease.
So the timing here is critical.
If the preterm infants were too young to be considered viable outside the womb, she can't be charged with murder.
And if they were old enough to live outside the womb but died before Maryland passed its 2005 fetal homicide law, it may not be a crime, even if she caused their deaths.
The law was designed to penalize those who kill a pregnant woman or her viable fetus, includes a provision shielding pregnant women from prosecution for actions that result in their own fetus' death.
So it can, you can't kill a pregnant woman and her fetus, but she can.
You can't, but she can.
Horrible story.
A literal horror story.
There's nothing they can do about this.
This is just.
And it keeps going.
A 39-year-old grandmother, can we do the math on this?
A 39-year-old grandmother accused of selling heroin on the streets of a Los Angeles suburb with her 11-year-old granddaughter as a lookout has been arrested on drug and child endangerment charges.
This is not supposed to happen.
Women do not do these things.
Women are the nurturers and the protectors.
They're innocent victims of a patriarchal and predatorial predatory male society.
Undercover officers watched for two weeks as Martha Gutierrez Novas sold heroin at a bus stop in Long Beach, south of L.A., clutching a brown and white chihuahua, little ankle biters, and often with her granddaughter at her side.
The 39-year-old grandmother has an 11-year-old granddaughter.
That's 28?
And of course, her legal or illegal status is not mentioned in this story.
Flower Mound, Texas, a stay-at-home mother in an affluent Dallas suburb, fatally shot her husband and two children as they slept before killing herself.
Detectives are reviewing a suicide note left in the house where Andrea Roberts killed her husband, Michael Lewis Roberts, and their children, 11 and 7 years old, each had a single gunshot wound to the head.
They'd been to a soccer game the night before.
Okay, girls.
And Griselda Aranzacu was puzzled when she noticed her slender neighbor developing a bulging tummy that would repeatedly appear and vanish.
She suspected that Nancy Ortiz was pregnant after Ortiz visited her home last summer, but didn't want to pry.
Later, I did ask myself where her baby was.
Sheriff's Department deputy said Tuesday they believe Ortiz had three babies.
The same children whose abandonment and origins captivated the small farming community 60 miles southeast of Fresno.
The last abandoned child, a newborn girl, died in the bed of a pickup truck in December.
Police believe that 22-year-old Ortiz left the baby there.
The baby's two older siblings survived their abandonment.
Out of control, not possible.
Women, two teenagers, kidnapped a pregnant woman that they met online, took her to a motel in an effort to take her baby.
A plan was foiled when one of the teens got scared, called the cops.
Prosecutors say that Elisa Betts, 17, Lauren Gash, 19, kidnapped Amanda Howard, 18.
Gash of Odessa, Betts of Atchison, Kansas, were arraigned on felony kidnapping charges Tuesday.
Gash also was charged with assault.
Finally, ladies and gentlemen, big story in the Associated Press today that the white wives, white mothers of troops deployed overseas in battle, abuse their children.
Black mothers don't.
Hispanic wives don't, but white mothers of troops dispatched overseas abuse their children.
That's the feminist update today.
We got a quick timeout.
We'll take it.
Be back after this.
They will.
All right, we're back.
Let's go to the email.
Dear Rush, the story you just related today about the mother maltreating her adopted children is patently false.
It's an established fact that adoptive parents are more loving toward their children than our biological parents.
We've been taught this in this country.
You know it and I know it.
So get back on the side of the truth.
He reminds me that in many cases, this has been said because it's that adoptive parents really want the child.
They're less abusive and so forth.
By the way, I had some email people doubting me on this military story.
Here it is.
It's actually Reuters.
I said it was AP.
The jump in child neglect and abuse by parents left behind while U.S. soldiers are deployed reflects how the stress of war hits home.
A new study shows.
Data from 1,771 Army families since September 2001 shows incidents of parental mistreatment increased 42% when one parent was deployed to a combat zone.
The rate of child neglect increased four times.
The rate of physical abuse almost doubled among those women during deployments.
White civilian mothers were the most likely to mistreat their children during deployments.
Smaller rise is seen among Hispanic and black mothers.
You doubt me, my do not doubt me.
Journalists wonder why they're at the low end of the scale on things.
Dear Mr. Limbaugh, how is it that you never wear a nice pair of worn-out jeans?
I think you'd look fine in them.
Levi's, preferably.
I do care much about politics.
I've got a very excellent guy here in Kansas signed Karen.
You know, I've answered this question over the years countless times.
I'll answer it again.
I have a political aversion to blue jeans.
I'm biased against them.
I really am.
Aside from the fact that I have yet, because I've been forced over the course of my life, I have been forced by certain people to try a pair of jeans.
So I've gone and I've tried them on, and I hate them.
They're not comfortable.
They just are not comfortable to me.
I do not, for some reason, I hate wearing anything that makes me feel like I have it on.
And blue jeans make me feel like wearing burlap.
But more than that, ladies and gentlemen, more than that.
Back in 1968, 69, when I was in my second or third year of my broadcast career, I was a DJ working two hours before school, two hours after school.
And there was a little university in my town of Cape Girardo, Southeast Missouri State University.
I happened to attend there one year before deciding that a required PE course, ballroom dance, taught by a former drill sergeant in the wax, was not for me.
And I said, if this is college, this is not, if I have to take this, I got better things.
So I moved on.
While I was there, the Vietnam War was waging.
And I was busy trying to become part of the establishment.
I was trying to show myself and the adults that I hoped to impress along the way that I was serious.
I took myself seriously, my life seriously, and I wasn't going to run around blowing up banks.
And I wasn't going to join protest marches.
And I wasn't going to get tear gassed or any of that.
And I looked at the people doing all that, and they were wearing tie-dyes, t-shirts, blue jeans, long-haired maggot-infested types.
I ain't going to be me.
It became a uniform.
And it just, it just, it just, it stuck.
And now, you know, I don't do anything outside that requires jeans.
I wear golf slacks and shorts.
I really don't find them comfortable.
That's those are the two answers.
Let's go to Concord, New Hampshire.
Go back to the phones.
This is Mike.
Nice to have you, sir, on the program.
Hi, Rush.
I'm a big fan.
This is the 9-11 dude at 9-11Dude.com.
And I've got a couple of questions regarding bin Laden.
What is 9-11Dude.com?
It's a site dedicated to trying to figure out what exactly did happen that day.
You don't know yet?
Well, I mean, there are some stories and there are some theories, and they're all differing and pretty much conflicting.
And we're trying to sort it all out.
But the official...
Sturdly, what are you doing to me today here?
I mean, this is a 19th anniversary day.
I had no idea it was your 19th anniversary, but congratulations.
Most big fans did know that.
Well, I used to be a big fan of yours when I lived down south and ever since I moved north.
Oh, but you used to be a hick, but now that you've gotten sophisticated.
Exactly.
Yeah, yes.
It's just one of those geographical situations.
Anyway, my questions are these.
Recently, Robert Mueller stated that he doesn't have enough evidence to indict bin Laden for the attacks.
And as a consequence of that, they're not looking for him.
And a while back, I don't know how long ago it was, a couple months, maybe even as long as six months ago, I remember reading a press report.
Let me ask you, do the Democrat presidential candidates know this?
Because they're basing the entire war on terrorist success on the capture or murder of bin Laden.
That's a very, very good point.
And I actually asked this question of Benny Thompson on Friday on C-SPAN, and he declined to answer.
He didn't have an answer for it.
So that's a very good point.
Okay, so there's not enough evidence to indict Bin Laden, and the FBI is not looking for him.
Right.
And the CIA disbanded the unit that was out to find him.
And it kind of begs the question: well, if the FBI isn't looking for him, the CIA isn't looking for him, then who is?
Try special ops.
I hope so.
Yeah.
Don't think we're not looking for him.
I don't know what you're thinking, but the idea that we're not looking for him.
See, the big thing to me, I'm sorry, folks.
I have to go back to Tora Bora.
We turned that place 2,000 degrees.
And it is said that bin Laden was seen on the ground that if he got away from there, then he got away.
But I, frankly, I'm not convinced that the guy is still alive.
But it doesn't matter, regardless.
Bin Laden, we didn't capture or kill Hitler.
We didn't capture or kill Tojo.
We didn't capture or kill Mussolini.
I mean, these guys did themselves.
We didn't determine the success in those wars on the capture or assassination beforehand of the ringleaders of these particular nations and movements.
Doug in Columbus, thank you for calling, sir.
You're next on the EIB network.
Peter told me to get right to the point, but first I'm going to say I am your biggest fan.
I've been listening for 19 years.
I used to live in the San Joaquin Valley when you were first in Sacramento.
Thanks for everything that you've done and you've done.
Second thing is, I'd like to say real quick is that we were talking about the other night in my golf league, who'd you like to play most golf with?
Some people said, you know, Bobby Jones.
Some people said Tiger Wood.
Some people said Jack Nicholas.
I said Rush Limbaugh.
They all looked at me like I was crazy.
And I said, you know what?
We've got similar golf games, shoot about the same scores.
He'd be the most interesting guy to talk to.
I'm sure he can get on some of the nicest places in the world to play.
I think it'd be a wonderful place to play golf with.
I'd be a wonderful world if I could play golf with you again.
Happy anniversary.
Plus, I bring the best cigars.
Oh, my goodness gracious.
See, I'll tell you what, you bring the cigars and I'll bring the cognac.
I'll tell you what.
Hey, real quick here, I was listening at the top of the show where I heard your quotes from Mr. Obama there, Barack Obama.
And I just have a couple of questions.
Is that, Mr. If I were the crash buy media, I prefer to call it a crash.
Hold on, you're talking just a little bit too fast today.
You're talking fast because you don't think you have too much time, which you're right.
You don't have much time.
We've got a commercial break coming.
We'll just calm down, calm down, calm down.
We'll take the commercial break and we come down and we'll get your comments about bin Laden.
No, that's wrong caller.
Barack.
Peace.
My bad.
Back here in a second.
And we are back holding Fort here, the EIB Southern Command, Limbaugh Institute for Advanced Conservative Studies.
I just saw watching the Fox News channel.
There was this crawl at the bottom of the screen.
In Jacksonville, Florida, 75-year-old guy claims that a hooker held him hostage for two weeks.
I wonder if she's available next week.
Doug and Columbus, we're back to you.
Dawn can't believe I said that.
We're back to you, Doug.
Do you want to talk about Barack and his advisors and his military plans to invade Pakistan and kill bin Laden?
Absolutely.
And like I started to say, I call them the crash by media because they're crashing and burning.
They're not even driving by anymore.
But I mean, the simple questions would be, and you know what happened to a Republican candidate the following day in the paper, would be, who are your generals and the military advisors for this plan to invade Pakistan?
And how many current Pakistani troops are there out there currently working on this on looking for these terrorists that you say that are there?
You know, that'd be my first question.
The second one is, will the UN give you the green light?
And if they don't give you the green light to invade Pakistan, then what do you do?
Do you stand up and do it because you think it's right?
If elected, do you think it was a good idea to give terrorists an 18-month advantage?
These are questions.
These are pretty good questions.
These are questions that the Democrats ought to ask him in their next debate.
Okay, what about the UN?
You're just going to unilaterally go in there.
You're not going to tell Musharraf you're going to give Musharraf a heads up.
You're just going to go in there.
Where are you going to do?
What's the battle plan?
Who are the generals advising you on this?
Will they support your plan?
Exactly.
But see, if elected, do you think it was a good idea to give terrorism, the terrorists, a head start, an 18-month head start to move to a new location or to have their people trained and be out and out and moving out of that location to carry out their missions?
There's just so many things that are just so askew by a person that's trying to undermine the current administration.
Well, that's true.
But in addition to undermining the current administration, you got to understand there is a big-time presidential primary campaign underway, and he's trying to chip away at Mrs. Clinton's lead.
And she called him naive.
You got to look at all this stuff in context.
She called him naive after saying that he would meet with the thug dictators of the world as president and extend the offices of the presidency to these guys and legitimize them.
And Ms. Clinton, that's very naive.
I'm all for diplomacy out there, but send underlings.
Certainly wouldn't do it the first year.
Very naive for Barack to say this kind of thing.
He fired back with something, and she said, okay, the name calling's getting silly here.
So, Barack is attempting to shore up his toughness here.
You know, there's a interesting play, too, because this is not what the Kuk Fringe base wants to hear.
The Kuk Fringe base doesn't want to hear that troops are going anywhere but home.
But he's trying to give himself gravity toss it.
Well, see, it's going to be interesting to see.
I and a lot of other people like you think this is just a huge boondoggle.
He has shown he does not have the gravitas.
He does not have the experience.
He doesn't have the sensitivities to go in and say in a major speech to a guy that's barely hanging on, leading his country that we need as an ally: if you don't do what we want, we're coming in, not going to the UN.
We're not going to get any world test.
We're not going to get anybody's permission.
We're going in.
You got to get them.
If you're not going to get them, we're going to get them.
I think the real purpose here is to try to, as you say, highlight for Libs that Bush is incompetent, wasting our treasure and money and time in Iraq when the real enemy is in Pakistan going back and forth the border between Afghanistan and Pakistan.
We had a caller earlier in the program, by the way, who said, you know, we're in Iraq and this is exactly what bin Laden wants.
Bin Laden wants our army to deteriorate.
He wants morale to go crazy.
He wants our army to break.
He wants our army to fall apart like the Soviets' army fell apart after Afghanistan.
The problem is for that line of thinking is we go into Iraq to overthrow Saddam and try to establish a beachhead of democracy.
Who pours in there?
Bin Laden, Al-Qaeda.
We lured these people in there and distracted them from attacking us anywhere else.
There's all kinds of ways of looking at this, but the idea that bin Laden is pulling our strings and we're just a bunch of marionettes, that's true if you talk about today's liberals.
It's true if you talk about today's Democrats, but it's not true if you're talking about Bush and those in the Pentagon that support him.
And by the way, for those of you who just cringe when you hear Barack Obama start talking about invading Pakistan to go get bin Laden and thus to claim victory in the war, I mean, that's so just sophistry.
But how do we get to this situation?
Why is it that bin Laden is, if he's still alive, pretty much has a safe haven?
Anybody know?
Why did this happen?
Why did Pakistan make the deal?
Diplomacy.
Pakistan, rather than use military action to wipe out these al-Qaeda encampments in its northwest provinces, negotiated.
They made a deal.
They negotiated a deal with those sheltering Obama.
You leave us alone and we'll leave you alone.
But he's now, he had to get up today with a double whammy because he gets up and he hears that Obama wants to invade his country.
Then some hack from Al-Qaeda's put a video out urging a coup of the Musharraf government.
Rich and Jacksonville, you're next, sir.
Nice to have you on the EIB network.
How you doing, Rush?
Fine, sir.
Mega Dittos, and I've been listening to you since 93.
They didn't have you on the air in Portugal.
But anyway, just real quick.
The quick comment I wanted to make was I just thought we were spending a little bit too much time on Hillary's cleavage yesterday.
And I know we're on the air talking about it, so that's even more time.
But I think I'm missing the big picture on why it's such a big topic.
Hence, any ideas?
I'm not sure I heard everything you said.
You're upset that I spent too much time on Hillary's cleavage yesterday.
No, no, not just you.
I think, you know, it's in the press.
Just because one day it was on, I guess she showed it or something.
I haven't even seen the picture yet.
Well, there's nothing to see.
Bill Richardson's probably got more cleavage than Hillary does.
And maybe her own husband does.
Wait a minute.
Are you curious why the national media was preoccupied with it?
Yes, that's what I was saying.
Oh, because Hillary was being attacked.
Hillary was being attacked.
You got to put this in the context of the events.
The Breck girl, Brett girl's wife comes out and says that the Breck girl, her husband, is more of a woman than Hillary, more sensitive to feminist issues than Hillary, and that she acts like a man.
So they get Bill Clinton to go on Good Morning America.
The former president of the United States reduced to going on Good Morning America to defend his wife's femininity.
And I don't think he pulled it off.
He did not do a good job of it.
So then after that, Hillary shows up on the Senate floor wearing a plunging neckline when she normally wears Mao jackets.
That caused a fashion editor at the Washington Post to write a story about the Clintons.
That is that is sexist.
That is horrible.
That is terrible.
And they sent out a fundraising letter portraying Hillary as a victim once again.
One of the things to put this put in perspective for you on this, I did it in the morning update today.
You look at all of the names that George Bush has been called, all the things he's been accused of.
He was behind 9-11.
He was selected, not elected.
He was in favor of lynching blacks.
They actually ran an ad during the presidential campaign of 2000.
They've called him Hitler.
They made fun of him for staying and reading to the kids when 9-11 holdup happened.
They made fun of him.
They called him a coward for going to a secure location on Air Force One after the Pentagon and 9-11 events happened.
I mean, they just vilified the guy.
And what does he do?
He ignores it and keeps doing his job and stays focused on his job.
The Washington Post runs a little piece on Mrs. Clinton's cleavage, which she doesn't show very much.
And stop the presses.
This is outrageous.
This is an assault.
This is sexism.
I'm going to defend myself and I'm going to fundraise for it.
She got no guts.
It doesn't seem very presidential to me, folks, to get all upset.
Ignore it.
But no, and it doesn't upset her, by the way.
It was a fundraising opportunity.
Hillary has thrived as the victim.
And anytime something happens that she can be portrayed that way or portray herself that way and fundraise, she will take it.
By the way, requests are pouring in for our latest tune from the Brett girl, John Edwards.
More of a woman than you.
More of a woman than you is the title of the tune.
As usual, I'll have my brain tied behind my back just to make it fair.
Rush Limbaugh, number one among Pakistani cab drivers in New York City.
We own that market.
They love the show.
800-282-2882.
If you want to be on the program, you know, when I first read this story, this is absurd.
This is just, it's getting out of hand, and it's nobody's stopping it.
Everybody's going along with it.
We're losing New York.
And I thought, well, maybe I don't know enough about this because I've not been a parent.
But, you know, they banned smoking.
They have banned smoking in New York City.
They banned trans fats.
And now they're going to ban the baby bottle.
They're going to mandate breastfeeding by 2010 or 2000.
I'm not kidding.
Free formula samples and formula promotional materials are now banned from gift bags given to new mothers at the 11 hospitals in the city run by the city's health and hospital corporation.
Instead, new mothers will get a tote bag stuffed with disposable nursing pads, a mini cooler for breast milk bottles, and pint-sized t-shirts for the babies that proudly declare, I eat at moms.
The move comes as World Breastfeeding Week is set to begin tomorrow.
And today, city health officials will announce.
You know, I remember I was a kid, I had dreams that I was Dolly Parton's baby and that she didn't put me on formula.
City health officials will announce a campaign to promote breastfeeding instead of using formula.
I, you know, my first reaction was, it's none of your damn business.
If somebody wants to bottle feed the baby, get out of their lives.
But I don't know enough about the medical aspect.
This is, this seems to be.
We have this story from Great Britain.
Parents not mentioned in a story about how the government is responsible for youth behavior.
British kids running out of control, drinking, drugging, binging, all these things.
They need more government programs to fix it.
Not once in the story will you read the word parents.
Now you've got the city of New York telling people you can't smoke, you got can't eat trans fat, and now you can't bottle feed your baby.
Why do you think it's good?
What do you think it's a good thing?
I know I'm going to get a sexist answer to this.
I shouldn't even ask you.
It's healthier for the children.
It's healthier for the children.
Well, I've heard that's one of the reasons that I pull back.
But do we have any known cases of babies dying having been fed formula?
Do we know this?
I know.
I mean, how many versus versus like the woman in Maryland that aborted her own fetuses and buried them?
Was that because of formula or because, well, no, that wording born yets is not even a factor.
Bob in Wichita Falls, Texas.
Welcome to the EIB Network, sir.
It's great to have you with us.
Honor to speak to you, sir, and happy anniversary.
Thank you, sir.
Well, I was calling because I wondered if we should really be surprised about this thing in Great Britain that, I mean, we have spent many, many years removing men and replacing them with the government or other organizations, and now we're removing women.
Well, now, wait, I don't know, but the UK, in this country, we have removed, the government did take the place of way too many black fathers.
I don't know how often it's happening in Great Britain, but it still is a good point.
The government did take on the role of father, but they don't have any disciplinary role because they're not in the house.
The father is nothing more than a check that supports the mother, so the mother doesn't need dad to hang around.
That's primarily what happened.
Yeah, well, I mean, I'm a custodial father, which is a rarity in itself.
And I mean, I- Wait a minute, wait a minute, wait a minute.
I try to stay as far away from fatherhood in reality.
What is a custodial father?
I have custody of my children.
Oh.
Oh.
Which was a long and expensive fight, I assure you.
Yeah, but it's amazing you got them.
Well, it took a lot of work on my part and a lot of negative aspects on the mother's part.
Well, that's why it's going to have to be the case if you got it.
Because normally you would be lucky to ever see them again.
But, I mean, I have to be honest, from a custodial father's standpoint, I kind of like that the government is trying to replace women because the women, no, well, no, now listen, because the women are much more organized than this, and they will fight this.
You like the government's trying to replace the women?
The women, I mean, come on now.
The women are much more organized, and they will organize a fight against this, and we can jump on the coattail and ride that right in.
We can get the government out of parenting altogether.
Well, look, I got to run here, but I'm glad you called, Bob, and thanks for holding on.
I really appreciate it.
By the way, the Democrats are going to pull all their votes on Iraq resolutions until September.
They're going to pull everything, including the Murtha bill.
But the press is spinning for them.
The drive-bys are spinning for them.
I will tell you the truth about it when we come back.
Yep, Democrats pulling off all of their votes.
They're pulling all their votes in the Senate and the House on Iraq until September.
By the way, that breastfeeding and bottle ban story in New York as something Hillary could really get her hands around, folks, because there are women who cannot breastfeed, and this is going to stigmatize them.
What are they going to do?
Have an exemption?
▲
Export Selection