All Episodes
Previous Next
June 6, 2007 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:37
June 6, 2007, Wednesday, Hour #3
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome back, folks.
Still lots to do here on the Excellence at Broadcasting Network, Rush Limbaugh, and the EIB network, the Limbaugh Institute for Advanced Conservative Studies.
Telephone number if you want to be on the program 800-282-2882.
And the email address is rush at EIBnet.com.
Looking forward to talking to you as the program unfolds in our final hour today.
Middle of the week already, fastest week in media.
Oh, programming note, I will be out on Friday, ladies and gentlemen.
Roger Hedgecock from San Diego will be guest hosting the program on Friday.
Be back on Monday.
The New York Times has done it again.
On Sunday, they buried the JFK terror plot story on page 30, 30, depending on the paper.
It was, you know, I had the international edition of the, well, the outside New York edition, page 30 in my paper, page 37 in the New York edition, they buried it.
And they've done it again.
Headline, new study finds gains since No Child Left Behind.
Student achievement has increased.
Test score gaps between white students and black and Hispanic students have narrowed in many states since President Bush signed the No Child Left Behind law in 2002, according to a new survey of state scores in reading and math.
But the study released by the Center on Education Policy cautioned it's difficult, if not impossible, to determine the extent to which these trends in test results have occurred because of No Child Left Behind.
But the news is great, but the news here is great.
But they get butts throughout the story.
But the interesting thing here is where was this story in the New York Times?
Story was on page C15, right before the sports pages in the New York Times.
And we all know that none of those wimped sissies who read the New York Times give a damn about sports because it's too macho.
So we know that they're never going to see this.
Barack Obama.
Barack Obama, let me give you this quote from a story that mentioned this yesterday.
He talked about the quiet riot.
Obama noted that during the riots, this is the L.A. riots, the 15 years ago, South Central riots.
And he's talking about it's a quiet riot brewing in America today because Bush doesn't care, because Bush isn't doing enough.
This guy is inciting.
He was inciting riots.
He spoke to an audience of, well, I think I remember it yesterday, 8,000 people.
And to talk about a quiet riot that is brewing out there is dangerous.
It is reckless.
But I want you to listen to this quote from the story.
When you read further into it, Obama noted that during the riots, a bullet pierced the abdomen of a pregnant woman and lodged in the elbow of her fetus.
The baby was delivered by cesarean section.
The bullet was removed, and the child has only a small scar on her arm to show for it.
He used this incident as a metaphor.
Obama said society's problems are worsening because, quote, in too many places across the country, we have not even bothered to take the bullet out.
When we have more black men in prison than in college, then it's time to take the bullet out.
Black men in prison, the bullet in the elbow of the fetus of America?
That's his metaphor?
And what does this metaphor mean exactly, given that Obama's party is the party of a fetus isn't alife anyway?
Can you imagine?
Here is a party that does not believe that a fetus is a human life.
And Obama is saying there's a quiet riot out there.
And he cites this example of a fetus getting shot because her mother got shot.
The bullet lodges in the elbow.
They pull the bullet out.
The fetus survives.
Does he realize what a contradiction this is?
This is such a tortured analogy, and it is audacious.
And somebody needs to call him.
Can you imagine if a Republican candidate talked about something equivalent to this?
There's a quiet riot brewing out.
They'd be all over the place.
Headlines and so forth about how this is irresponsible trying to incite violence in America.
And what do you think Obama was doing?
And this is all to establish street cred, folks, as being down for the struggle.
He has to show that he is down for the civil rights struggle because, you know, they have all these pieces that the libs have written.
Is he black enough?
Is he not black enough?
He's the magic Negro, said the LA Times, all of this.
Yesterday, we had an extensive discussion on this program about that Democrat forum on CNN Sunday night where they made their appeal to those of you who are Christian voters in America.
And I appropriately said, what's this?
They normally hate you people.
They resent the hell out of you.
Now, all of a sudden, they're out there courting you.
What's this?
We have no room for religion and politics.
Separation of church and state.
Here come the libs trying to court you.
And this has been picked up on twice today.
Ruth Marcus in the Washington Post, the Democrats' leap of faith.
You know it's a different kind of candidate for him when Hillary Clinton allows that she sometimes prays.
When Barack Obama muses on the nature of good versus evil.
When John Edwards recounts that he strayed away from the Lord in adulthood, only to find that my faith came roaring back after the death of his 16-year-old son.
This is not Michael Dukakis' Democrat Party.
Instead, it was shown by Monday Night's Forum, I guess it was Monday Night on Faith, sponsored by CNN and a liberal group, Sojourners, that it's a party on a mission.
The mission is to make inroads into Republicans' ability to attract and, more importantly, turn out religious voters.
Mara Vandersleis, Democrat consultant who headed Kerry's 2000 efforts to connect with religious voters, said the biggest thing is that it happened, meaning the event on CNN Monday night.
Think how far we've come from just a couple of years ago when Republicans claimed religion and religious Americans.
So Ruth Marcus says, well, why the Democrats sweating the God gap?
Well, because of this.
Voters who attend worship at least once a week account for 40% of the electorate, according to exit polls, and they tilt heavily toward the GOP.
40% of the electorate.
You know, what's amazing about this to me is the Republicans, the blue-blood country club Republicans are embarrassed of these people.
You remember me telling you the stories I'm in the Northeastern dinner parties.
These country club blue-blood Republicans came up to me.
This is in early 90s.
What are you going to do about those Christian voters?
What are you going to do about them?
What am I going to do about them?
They're destroying the party.
Oh, there's abortion garbage.
We've got to get the abortion out of the party.
This killing is going to destroy the Republican Party.
That's all the reason the Republican Party was winning all those elections.
What was happening was these Northeastern guys getting henpecked by their wives, and they just didn't want to put up with it.
Plus, they were a little embarrassed themselves to be in the same party as a moral majority and these kinds of things.
So while the country club blue-blood moderate Republicans have been trying to drive these people out of the party, the Democrats are out there now making a big play for them.
And Ruth Marcus says here, for the 2008 campaign, the Democrats have the advantage, you might say they are blessed with, three front-running candidates for whom religion isn't a matter of conversion on the road to Des Moines.
Well, I think that's a little debatable.
I think these are Johnny Cumberland.
These people don't have a consistent track record of reaching out to religious voters.
None of them do.
Hillary doesn't.
Edwards doesn't.
Who else is in that mix up?
Hillary, help me out here.
I'm having a mental block.
These people are all Hillary Obama.
Well, we don't know about Obama.
He's only been around a national scene for two years.
Well, these guys, they're not known for running around talking about God and participating in prayer breakfasts and that kind of thing.
And then in the Christian Science Monitor today, Linda Feldman writes, can the religious left sway the 08 race?
Democrat presidential candidates speaking openly about faith competing for values, voters.
And she refers to this thing on CNN Monday night as an intimate discussion of faith.
There was nothing intimate about it.
That was the whole point.
That was what was observable.
And when Mrs. Clinton said, yeah, I pray and I have faith.
She didn't say in what or in who.
Finally, before we go to the break, ladies and gentlemen, sharks in one Florida River are getting a dose of human medicine and scientists want to know if it's a prescription for trouble.
Scientists recently found traces in sharks of prescription antidepressants, cholesterol-lowering drugs, and synthetic estrogens in the blood of young bull sharks in the Kalusahatchie River on Florida's southwest Gulf Coast.
This summer, they'll study the issue more widely.
On Friday, scientists with Moat Marine Lab fished for bull sharks as part of research to find out what drugs the sharks encounter most and whether the doses are large enough to alter how they behave and reproduce.
Sharks come into contact with treated wastewater, which includes traces of medications previously identified as Lipitor, Prozac, Zoloft, and Selexa.
Kalusa Hatchie receives treated wastewater from several sewer plants and passed by, well, isn't this interesting?
Prescription drugs in sharks, bull sharks, by the way.
It'd be interesting to note how it does affect their behavior and whether or not they'll be as aggressive, whether it'll be calmed down.
Finally, Honda is discontinuing its Accord hybrid sedan.
With gas prices reaching record highs and increasing public interest in environmentally friendly technologies, you'd think, this is the AP, you'd think that any car labeled as a hybrid would sell easily.
No, we wouldn't.
It's you people in the drive-by media who think all this stuff amongst yourselves.
But Honda Motor Company on Tuesday announced it'll discontinue the hybrid version of its Accord sedan, citing disappointing sales.
Analysts said that despite the Accord's superior performance compared with some of its higher volume competitors, it just doesn't fit with the current consumer demands for the smallest, cheapest hybrids with eye-popping fuel economies.
Nothing against Honda, obviously, but I cannot say that I'm disappointed in this because this always, when I see things like this, it rewards my faith in the overall informed intelligence of the American people.
They're not buying into this ridiculous hype.
Back in just a second.
You know, during the break at the top of the hour here, folks, Rachel, who is sitting in today for dawn transcribing calls in case I have trouble understanding with a bad phone line or cell connection, during the break, she said that she's just found out you're related to Andrew Jackson.
What's the deal?
Your great aunt or your great aunt was who was his wife.
Your great aunt.
Three, okay, great, great, great aunt was Andrew Jackson's wife.
Now, this scares me because the last woman who told me she was related to somebody like this was somebody said she was related to John Adams, and she asked me for $10 million.
I am not kidding.
So, you know, intelligence guided by experience.
All right, ladies and gentlemen, here is the prayer that FDR gave 63 years ago on the radio.
This is the anniversary, 63rd anniversary of the D-Day invasion.
And this is a prayer that could not be delivered by a president today without a whole bunch of activist groups raising all kinds of hell.
Talking about separation of church and state, you know the drill.
This is FDR.
63 years ago.
Last night, when I spoke with you about the fall of Rome, I knew at that moment that troops of the United States and our allies were crossing the English Channel in another and greater operation.
It has come to pass with success thus far.
And so in this poignant hour, I ask you to join me in prayer.
Almighty God, our sons, pride of our nation, this day have set upon a mighty endeavor, a struggle to preserve our republic, our religion, and our civilization, and to set free a suffering humanity.
Lead them straight and true.
Give strength to their arms, stoutness to their hearts, steadfastness in their faith.
They will need thy blessings.
Their road will be long and hard, for the enemy is strong.
He may hurl back our forces.
Success may not come with rushing speed, but we shall return again and again.
And we know that by thy grace and by the righteousness of our cause, our sons will triumph.
They will be sore tried by night and by day without rest until the victory is won.
The darkness will be rent by noise and flame.
Men's souls will be shaken with the violences of war.
For these men are lately drawn from the ways of peace.
They fight not for the lust of conquest.
They fight to end conquest.
They fight to liberate.
They fight to let justice arise and tolerance and goodwill among all thy people.
They yearn but for the end of battle, for their return to the haven of home.
Some will never return.
Embrace these, Father, and receive them, thy heroic servants, into thy kingdom.
And for us at home, fathers, mothers, children, wives, sisters, and brothers of brave men overseas whose thoughts and prayers are ever with them, help us, Almighty God, to rededicate ourselves in renewed faith in thee in this hour of great sacrifice.
Many people have urged that I call the nation into a single day of special prayer.
But because the road is long and the desire is great, I ask that our people devote themselves in countenance of prayer.
As we rise to each new day and again when each day is spent, let words of prayer be on our lips, invoking thy help to our efforts.
Give us strength, too, strengthen our daily tasks to redouble the contributions we make in the physical and the material support of our armed forces.
And let our hearts be stout to wait out the long travail, to bear sorrows that may come, to impart our courage unto our sons wheresoever they may be.
And O Lord, give us faith.
Give us faith in thee, faith in our sons, faith in each other, faith in our united crusade.
Let not the keenness of our spirit ever be dulled.
Let not the impacts of temporary events, of temporal matters of but fleeting moment, let not these deter us in our unconquerable purpose.
With thy blessing, we shall prevail over the unholy forces of our enemy.
Help us to conquer the apostles of greed and racial arrogancies.
Lead us to the saving of our country and with our sister nations into a world unity that will spell a sure peace, a peace invulnerable to the schemings of unworthy men, and a peace that will let all men live in freedom, reaping the just rewards of their honest toil.
Thy will be done, Almighty God.
Amen.
That's 63 years ago, Franklin Delano Roosevelt on the radio did this on the day of the D-Day invasion, where 6,000 Allied troops perished in one day.
It helps to remember all this, to put current events in perspective.
History is always valuable for that because it shows us just how much perspective we lack, historical knowledge, context that some of us are unable to apply to present-day circumstances.
Noteworthy also in this, not just the total, FDR, as the president of the country threw this nation open to God's will.
He was a liberal Democrat.
Now, if FDR had been president at a Democrat Faith Forum on Monday night and said things like this, then I would have acknowledged that there's some genuine, obvious connection to God there.
But that's not what we got from this current crop.
But the point is, this prayer could not be delivered by a president of the United States today.
Oh, he could deliver it.
But do you know the imaginary controversy, the outcries, the protests, the anger, and the rage?
Because back then, the nation was united in victory.
Today it's not.
Today there's a political party that's doing its best to secure defeat for their own personal political gain down the road.
And they would not stand for this because they would accuse the president who offered a prayer like this of suggesting that God was not on the Democrat side.
So it's interesting to hear this.
It's powerful to read it to you.
And I know that most of you probably heard it for the first time today.
Be back.
Continue after this.
All right, back to the phones we go.
I know you've been patient, and I appreciate it.
We'll go to Maui, and this is John.
Thank you, sir.
Welcome to the EIB Network.
Yeah, thank you, Rush.
Get your clubs and your fastback swing and some cash and come on out.
I'm going.
I'm going to be there in August, but I'm not going to be in Maui.
Why the way?
Why do I need to bring a cash?
We play for keeps.
Oh, and I'm going to lose to you.
Is that the deal?
Where do you play in Maui?
I usually play right here at Maui Country Club.
There was a time when I used to go to the resort courses, but I grew out of that.
I can't play well at them.
Anyway, on the Valerie Plain situation, just a couple things.
One, The sentence that Scooter Libby got in light of what happened to Sandy Berger was just an outrage.
But more importantly, to begin with, Playme was not audible within the meaning of the statute.
And the prosecutor should have known that within a few days after this investigation began.
And so, knowing this, he proceeded with the investigation.
And along the way, Libby was convicted of perjury, which impeded the investigation.
Well, it was an unnecessary investigation.
It's a process crime.
Yeah, well, how can you impede an investigation into a crime that, one, was not committed, and two, could not, in fact, have been committed.
But more importantly than that, what about the Attorney General and the director of the CIA?
The Attorney General and more importantly, the CIA director knew that Playm was not audible within the meaning of the statute.
The Attorney General also knew this, and while knowing it, unleashed a political zealot prosecutor with no boundaries, no reporting, no mandate, apparently, to prey on his own people.
What is with this administration?
What world are they living in?
You're a retired judge.
You tell us what's the.
It's all absurd to us.
This is Kafka-esque.
Yeah, it's shocking.
You know, the pressure on Gonzalez in light of how he allowed Libby to be thrown to the dogs when there was no reason for it, none whatsoever.
This thing could have been stopped by the director of the CIA coming out early on and simply saying, we've determined that our employee's position is such that she does not come within the ambient of the statute.
And that should have been the end of it then and there.
Oh, look, it's even worse than that.
The whole case was based on lies told by Joe Wilson, who was never held accountable for them.
Valerie Playm's main squeeze.
But, John, before we go here, I want to, I don't know if you heard this earlier today, but I want to read an excerpt of a letter that Paul Wolfowitz wrote to Judge Reggie Walton asking for leniency in the sentencing of Scooter Libby.
Now, this will burn you up because while none of the rest of this makes any sense, this judge gave this guy almost the entire sentence that the prosecutor asked for.
He asked for three years, he's getting two and a half, and it looks like he's going to be sent straight to jail.
He's not going to be allowed to remain free while the appeal process takes place.
And here's the excerpt from the letter that Wolfowitz wrote to the judge asking for leniency.
I also remember how Mr. Libby offered his services pro bono or at reduced costs after he had returned to private law practice to help former colleagues and friends with legal issues.
In one case, he helped a public official defend himself against libelous accusations, something that is extremely difficult to do for anybody in public office.
The official in question was Richard Armitage, who more recently served as Deputy Secretary of State.
It was Richard Armitage who first leaked Valerie Plame's identity.
Scooter Libby helped bail Armitage out of problems.
Armitage let Libby twist in the wind.
I cannot, folks, imagine what it's like to be Scooter Libby today.
I cannot imagine what it's like to be his family.
This is such just a travesty from the get-go.
Now, you asked why wasn't this case shut down when there was no need for it?
That's, at best, all we can do is guess.
And my guess has always been that there was a big to-do about the independent counsel.
The media was demanding this.
Why, this woman's identity had been leaked.
Why, this was the only leak that the media ever cared to get to the bottom of.
And by the way, the only time I'm aware of they really ever cared about somebody at the CIA because they knew who she was and they knew who her husband was.
They were both out trying to destroy the Bush administration, and Bush administration sat back and let it all happen.
So the prosecutor gets involved, finds out there's no crime.
Can't just say, sorry, no crime here.
Everybody's got their, you know, hopes up, expectations high.
So you begin this big investigation and you get your indictment and you make it look like it was all worthwhile.
So there was no crime.
The crime was created in the process of conducting the investigation, the alleged crime, for which Libby's been convicted.
I just, seriously, I cannot relate to what it must be like today to be Scooter Libby and his family.
You've got to be questioning everything.
What good is what I've done for this country?
You talk about somebody's off everybody's radar.
Scooter Libby never hurt a soul.
Scooter Libby was just one of these loyal foot soldiers in the background of the administration.
And it makes you wonder, you know, loyalty, way too many places in this country is a one-way street.
And it clearly looks like it's that way in this case.
Imagine if I had a story for you that went something like this.
Ex-President William J. Clinton sentenced to 30 months in jail and a $250,000 fine.
The speculation's over.
The judge has spoken.
Former President Clinton sentenced to 30 months in jail, two and a half years behind bars, slapped with a quarter of a million dollar fine.
You could call this ruling the sentence heard around the world.
A tabloid screamed Clinton off to clink.
The New York Times more soberly hailing the sentence as appropriate indeed necessary punishment for Clinton's lies to a grand jury.
Their conclusion, at a time when high administration officials routinely dissemble and claim lapses of memory, immediate jail time for Mr. Clinton is the best way to send a message that obstruction of justice will be severely punished.
Our justice system has been tested and it has not failed us.
Historians will tell us how much the Clinton perjury affected the 2006 election and how much the Clinton jail time will affect the 2008 election.
My friends, I'm not illustrating absurdity with absurdity.
I'm illustrating absurdity with name swapping.
Because this is what's happened to Scooter Libby, and he didn't do it.
He may not have lied.
It's still a matter of question.
Well, the jury says he did, so he did.
We know Clinton lied to a grand jury, suborned perjury, among others.
Lied under oath to a federal judge.
Try this.
How about this?
Try this version of the story.
Scooter Libby, charged with lying to a grand jury, stays on job for two more years, gets $12 million book deal, $40 million in speaking fees, and a $200 million library, and has become the Democrat Party's most favored ex-statesman roaming the world as their goodwill ambassador.
Bill Clinton lied to a grand jury, suborned perjury.
He gets $150,000 to $200,000 of speech, $12 million book deal, $200 million library.
Scooter Libby goes to jail for two and a half years.
The correct comparison here is not Scooter Libby to Sandy Burglar.
It is Scooter Libby to Bill Clinton.
Now, this illustration is flawed, obviously, because Clinton knowingly lied to the grand jury.
He did it on purpose.
Libby might or might not have.
And so many people in the country, with apologies to Simon and Garfunkel and Mrs. Robinson, where have you gone, George W.
They want the pardon.
The White House says we're not going to intervene.
We never do until the appeals process is over.
People want a political witch hunt here corrected.
And they want the president to defend his defenders.
Still time.
We'll be back after this.
Don't go away.
And we are back, El Rushbo on a roll, ladies and gentlemen, a national treasure, a living legend, now documented to be almost always right, 98.7% of the time.
Damon in Homer, Louisiana.
Welcome to the program, sir.
Rodeto there, Rush, from the Oilfield and Cajun country.
Yeah, thank you, sir.
It's great.
I always love getting people from Cajun Country.
Hey, look, Rush, I'm going to go ahead and take the other side of this.
I say that the two wimps on that plane were the guys who didn't put up a fight.
The thing is, this is that I work in the oil field and I've been all over the world and I've traveled a lot on the airplanes.
And I know how it works.
You know, after a couple of weeks on the rig.
Wait a minute.
These are troublemakers.
These are people intended.
You don't ever know what they intend on this airplane.
You wish they would have been successful.
See, the thing is, is that if they were mostly harmless, then it was okay.
But you know what?
I tell you what, if I was drinking and the flight attendants didn't even give me a warning and some two old guys came up to me and throw it up to me, there would be a fight.
I can guarantee you that.
I might have not have won, but I would have gone down slinging.
Well, that's a fantastic perspective.
I enjoy getting a real man perspective on this, taking the side of the perp set.
You know, all because you don't think they got a warning, right?
Well, I mean, I don't know, but I think they did.
I think they're a favorite procedure.
When you're drinking excessively on a plane, you know, the first thing they do is they stop.
Wait a minute.
It's hard to believe.
Wait a minute now.
Wait.
Wait a minute.
Wait.
It's hard to believe that you may be more informed than I on this, but I didn't.
Were they drinking?
Well, if they were being routed, they probably were drinking.
But I mean, if it's just a bunch of boys, you know, if they were warned not to stop making some noise and they didn't, but you know, and then too.
It was more than noise.
They were faking heart attacks.
They were clearly trying to, people were, there was curiosity about whether or not they were, you know, scoping things out for future missions.
And people have to be concerned about this on airplanes these days.
Oh, yeah.
Well, all I know is that if two old guys would have come up to me and I wouldn't have been warned by the flight attendants to stop making a little rowdy scene, there would have been a fight.
Like Justin Wilson always said, I guarantee.
Justin Wilson.
Is he still around?
I don't know.
He ain't even from Louisiana.
All right.
Well, Damon, look, I appreciate the call.
Fascinating perspective on this.
Donald in Evansville, Indiana, you're next on the EIB network.
Hello.
Hello.
Hey.
Testing.
Donald, are you there?
Yes, I am.
Yes.
Welcome, sir.
Thank you.
We're on the air.
This is your turn now.
Oh, well, I just heard you say you wondered about somebody had actually been at Normandy and what they thought of the situation today.
I was on a destroyer at Normandy, D-Day Hour, and we were patrolling up and down the Atlanta landing craft to protect them from submarines and E-boats.
And so I remember it just as if it was yesterday.
I'm sure.
How old are you today?
I'm 82.
82.
Yes.
Have you been to any of the reunions?
Oh, we have a reunion every year.
No, but over there, have you been to the 50th anniversary and the 60th?
Have you been to any of those?
At Baltimore?
At Normandy?
None of those.
The only 60th reunion I went to was later on.
We went down and picked up the king of Saudi Arabia and took him up to talk to President Roosevelt.
And the Friends of Saudi Arabia had a 60th anniversary party.
Well, they had other things going on, but they invited us down to Miami for the 60th, which was on Valentine's Day, 2005.
But that's the only here's the question that I asked.
And I want to go back and put it in the context I asked it because I had just read a story of an amendment to the immigration bill in the Senate that had been defeated.
It was an amendment offered by Senator Kyle.
Senator Kyle's amendment would have not permitted felons to become legal citizens, and it would have deported illegals who are felons now.
And that was defeated.
It was the effort to get rid of illegal citizens who are illegal immigrants who are felons was defeated.
And I just, I casually, knowing this is the 63rd anniversary, I threw it out there.
I said, gee, wife, is anybody that served during the D-Day invasion, what must you be thinking?
And that's what made you call.
What are you thinking about?
Look at Brush.
I've been a member of the Heritage Foundation for several years, and I'm conservative.
And I voted for President Bush twice, and I voted for Republicans last time, but I refused to donate any money to them.
And on this immigration bill, I contacted one of the senators, the Republican senator, and I contacted our new representative, who is a Democrat.
And the Democrat emailed me and said he was going to vote against the immigration bill.
And he was a former sheriff of the county here.
And I guess he knows what lawbreakers are like.
And so I have been everybody I could express my opinion to, I have been very much against this immigration bill.
And I emailed the White House, and all I got back from there was that they received my email, but they didn't have time to read all of them.
Does it make you I've got one minute here.
This is maybe a bit unfair to ask, but I'm going to ask it.
Does it make no, I'm sure it doesn't.
I shouldn't even ask this.
Go ahead and ask.
Does it make you wonder what you were fighting for on D-Day?
No, I know what I was fighting for, but it makes me sick to see what they're doing to our country.
Well, millions of Americans are with you.
I can't tell you what an honor it is that, A, you're in the audience, and B, that you got through today.
Thank you.
It's good to talk to you.
Thank you very much.
I did listen to you.
It's my honor, Donald.
This is Donald from Evansville, Indiana, and a veteran of the Normandy invasion, which took place 63 years ago today.
All right, folks.
This is worth what it's costing you.
I just got some little birds telling me, let's put it that way.
More turbulence is about to hit the Hillary campaign.
Somebody's leaking more campaign documents of hers, like the Skip Iowa document because she can't win.
But this time, the leaks are to the New York Times and might hit as early as tomorrow.
Somebody's sabotaging or trying to sabotage the Hillary campaign.
▲
Export Selection