All Episodes
Previous Next
May 22, 2007 - Rush Limbaugh Program
34:23
May 22, 2007, Tuesday, Hour #1
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome to today's edition of the Rush 24-7 podcast.
Oh, well, what a day for the drive-by media.
A National Hurricane Center has released its forecast, 13-7 name storms, five big mamas.
They want you to think five Katrinas in the media just excited as they can be.
Because now the media gets to scare us, terrorize us all they want.
With these predictions and so forth, just fits the mold for them.
Greetings, my friends, and welcome back, Rush Limbaugh, the EIB Network.
One and only I, your highly trained broadcast specialist, executing assigned host duties flawlessly, because I assign those duties, so if I assign them, I can't screw up.
Zero mistakes.
That's regular here on this program.
Phone number 800-282-2882, the email address rush at EIBNet.com.
A Washington Post story today.
Immigration compromise faces new opposition.
Proposal stays alive, but foes lie in wait.
What's interesting about this Washington Post story is that this little reference here on page two, supporters had expected opposition from both ends of the political spectrum, but they conceded they were taken aback by the furious response over the weekend, especially from conservatives who declared that the legislation is nothing short of amnesty for lawnmakers.
They were surprised.
You would think by now that these people would have known for how many years have they been trying to ram this amnesty stuff down our throats, and they know what's happened each time they've tried.
Surprised at the level of support they got from, and read talk radio on that, by the way.
Surprised from the see, we're just a niche audience here.
Nobody outside of you people has any idea what's going on here, of course, is their line of rap.
Anyway, they put the debate off the vote off until after the Memorial Day recess.
And the longer this goes on, the longer the delay, the more the debate, the more people find out what's in this, then of course the better we'll all be.
I'm going to tell you folks, doing nothing's better than doing this.
I mean, it is.
You're going to hear the exact opposite from all of the so-called experts.
We've got to do a bill.
We've got to do something.
This daddy's quo just wants it.
Yes, better than this.
We're talking.
You know, it's really even a misnomer to call this immigration.
This is not about immigration reform.
This is not immigration.
There's no assimilation here.
That's not what this is.
What this is, is an attempt to remake the United States culture and society as liberals envision it and would love it to be.
And that is a culture in society that keeps them perpetually in power.
That's what this is.
It's a whole, because there's a romantic attachment to the whole term immigration.
We are a nation of immigrants, goes the phrase.
We are the melting pot, blah, blah, blah.
And so I think the word immigration somehow does a little bit of a disservice here.
And it's not a purposefully done thing.
It's just it's confusing to people.
We're not talking about immigration in a traditional sense that it has been discussed as a way to build this country.
I had to take my little cat to the vet last night to the emergency vet, little pumpkin.
Yeah, it turns out it's some of a urinary tract infection.
She's an Abyssinian.
She's a ruddy Abyssinian.
And got her from a breeder, and the breeder does shows for cats.
And so some of them, there's a little inbreeding that goes on.
And sometimes if you get a cat that way from a breeder, a show breeder, then they might have some weaknesses with the immune system and this kind of thing.
And she's got, what's that?
Well, I would have loved to have been able to take family leave, but this happened last night at 7 o'clock.
But I don't think of that.
You know, the thing, I didn't even think of that.
See, this is the thing.
I got my stats.
Well, you can take family.
Everybody around here oriented toward vacation time except me.
Everybody around here oriented toward time off except me.
Yes, just kidding.
Anyway, she's got this condition.
Her bladder forms little crystals that end up blocking the urinary tract.
And she thinks that she's got to go to the bathroom and can't.
Poor little thing was suffering in there in a little box, in a litter box.
I'm watching this for 25 minutes.
And I know what had happened because we got a special food for it for this condition.
It's a soft foods made by Ralston Purina.
And of course, they discontinued it a month ago.
And the vet said, well, here's a substitute for it.
It does the same stuff.
She doesn't like it as much.
It's hard food.
She eats it, but she doesn't like it as much.
I also think that she was sending me a message of being gone for a week.
She was very, although from 3 o'clock this morning on.
I didn't get a whole lot of sleep, head-butting me, climbing on my hair, literally pulling my hair on the pillow.
So she's getting back.
We took her to the emergency vet last night.
Get an antibiotic, got back around 10.30 or 11 o'clock.
I was exhausted anyway from the time away.
And I just felt so sorry for this little cat because, you know, I don't know if any of you have had urinary tract infections.
You think you've got to go to the bathroom and they got a pee and you can't.
And of course, she was sitting there straining, started bleeding a little bit.
I'm not going to sit here and watch this.
I'm not going to wait overnight until a regular vet opens up.
So we went to the emergency vet.
Now it's on Forest Hills Boulevard.
Yeah, cats only or some such thing.
And they marveled in it.
I don't get to see Abyssinians much.
This is, by the way, my cat is not the kind of cat that's kind of pussycat that's wiping out those hef bunnies down in the keys.
Don't confuse this.
This is a tame cat, lovely little cat, 10 years old in August.
And aside from all this, the picture of health.
Listen to this story.
This is from USA Today, the headline alone.
Train kills man trying to kill woman.
It's from Los Angeles.
A man trying to kill his girlfriend by stopping a car in front of an approaching train was himself killed yesterday when the train hit the vehicle and launched it into him as he tried to run away.
The girlfriend survived.
The man drove the car in front of a group of other vehicles, stopped at a railroad crossing in the San Fernando Valley neighborhood of Sunland.
The driver, who was seen arguing with his girlfriend, parked the car in the tracks and jumped out, leaving her behind.
A northbound commuter train hit the rear of the car, hurling it into the man, the girlfriend taken to hospital in stable condition.
She gets hit by a train and lives.
He gets hit by his own car and he dies.
I mean, you know, we're not supposed to laugh at stuff, but I mean, this is the headline there.
The Democrats, ladies and gentlemen, I want you to be prepared because they have totally pulled out now of a timeline.
The Democrats have dropped insistence on an Iraq withdrawal timeline.
Now, my question, what about the will of the people?
We keep hearing the will of the people was, we got to get out of Iraq.
That's what the election in November of 06 meant.
Scrambling to send President Bush an emergency war spending bill that he'll sign.
Democrat leaders have decided to drop their insistence on a timeline for withdrawing U.S. forces from Iraq.
The move is a significant concession to the president and his allies on Capitol Hill who have steadfastly rejected any date for bringing U.S. troops home.
Democrats also working to include a minimum wage hike in the funding bill in an effort to push the long-delayed legislation.
By the way, they haven't got that done yet either.
Haven't got the minimum wage done.
They can't get us out of Iraq.
You think their side, you think their Kuk fringe base is going to be happy with this?
There's going to be fireworks over this.
This is going to be fun to watch.
And they're throwing things in here like the minimum wage to try to buy them off and not get so mad.
Pelosi, in the meantime, while this is announced, is flying off to Greenland to look at glaciers.
Now, we talked yesterday.
I asked you a question.
I'm going to ask you again.
During the Clinton administration, does anybody remember the hysteria on global warming that we are hearing every day during the Bush administration?
Sort of like homelessness.
When the Democrats in the White House, we don't have a homeless problem.
When a Republican's in the White House, we got plastic bags at grocery store problems.
We got homeless.
Everything is a crisis.
We're losing our image around the world.
Global warming is a pure political issue.
And what is she doing flying off to visit glaciers in Greenland?
By the way, they've found, I've got this story somewhere in the stack here.
I guess I'll wait to it when we get to the global warming update.
But there are some receding glaciers where?
Switzerland.
And they're finding all kinds of things underneath these glaciers.
Mines, where people lived and worked and so forth.
The glaciers came.
One year, the snows came and they didn't stop.
And so it kept going, getting colder and colder and colder.
The glaciers are now receding.
And the scientists talking about this, yeah, well, these are cycles.
We're just getting back to normal.
He's calling the current spate of global warming returning to normal.
Drive-by is also very excited about the continuing price rise of gasoline.
Oh, and folks, this was the subject of the morning update today, and I want to spend a little bit more time on this after the break.
Danny Glover, who, as you know, often on crusades, like he can't catch a cab in New York because he's a minority, is down in Venezuela, or was over the weekend, where the government of Hugo Chavez has given him about $18 million to produce a movie.
And the movie is aimed at bashing us, the United States, Western imperialism, and all of this.
And this represents, and then this idiot, Leonardo DiCaprio, an Al Gore acolyte, got his own global warming movie coming out in which he says we face extinction.
And Mikhail Gorbachev is one of the primary, he's a star.
He's one of the stars of the movie.
Now, it used to be, I mean, Hollywood, how many decades went by while Hollywood claiming they were persecuted when they were accused of being communists, or they were accused of being in league with communists?
Now look what's changed.
They can't wait to throw up their hands and say, hey, we're with the commies.
Quick timeout.
We'll be back and continue.
Stay with us.
America's Truth Detector, Dr. Democracy, all combined here as one harmless, lovable little fuzzball, Rush Limbaugh, the Limbaugh Institute for Advanced Conservative Studies.
You know, the drive-by media, a constant focus of this program, because they're so predictable.
They are more predictable than any, well, other than other liberals.
They're more predictable than anything out there going on.
You just, I have no doubt how they're going to report things.
And, you know, there's a they've chosen sides now.
They make no pretense at objectivity in the way they do their work.
They still go on television analyzing themselves and pretend and maintain that they're objective, but they've thrown their lot into the Democrats.
And they don't even hide this anymore in a number of ways.
I remember, in fact, grab, you know, it's been a long time.
Mike, we should do this as part of an SUV update.
Grab in a Yugo and let me know when you have it.
Chronicled when, when the I guess it was the some environmental group came out some 10 years ago, started bashing SUVs.
They are unsafe because the people who are not in them are at greater risk if people get into an accident with them.
They pollute, they use too much gasoline, and but the drive-bys just picked up the theme.
All of a sudden, everybody hated SUVs When one little liberal interest group, we started getting news stories about SUVs driving themselves off of the fourth level of a parking garage.
SUVs missing the exit, going off a bridge and ramming itself into an abutment over interstate highways.
And we sat here and marveled at this.
The SUV was driving itself.
There are no human beings.
The SUV is so evil it can handle itself.
We began to chronicle all of these examples of the way the media just falls right in line.
And not just one element of the media, but they all do it.
AP, UPI, the wire services, the cable channels when they report it.
And I've got a doozy for you today.
And this one is worth an SUV update.
Drove with pride, getting squashed by an SUV.
Driving with pride, though.
Crosstown traffic, Jimi Hendrix.
All right, here we go.
The headline is from the Orlando Sentinel.
SUV crashes into store, perhaps in attempt to steal guns.
It's right here.
Look, let me zoom in for you on the ditto cam, those of you watching this.
See that?
SUV crashes into store, perhaps in attempt to steal guns.
Orlando Sentinel comes through here with the big head.
And the story gets it right.
Robbers smashed a vehicle into an Orlando gun shop this morning for the second time in less than a year, possibly searching for weapons.
Somebody drove a stolen white SUV over the curb through the metal gates at Al's Army Navy store on North Orange Blossom Trail.
The suspect left the SUV abandoned.
The SUV is taken on its own identity and it is evil.
Now, these are headline writers, and these are people that write the story as well.
It just filters down.
It just filters.
A liberal interest group can make a claim.
It is news, and they all end up using it.
You got to hear this soundbite.
In fact, this is interesting.
Chris Matthews on Hardball last night being hard on former President Bill Clinton since his encounter with me.
His guests last night are Lois Romano of the Washington Post and Jonathan Darman of Newsweek.
And Matthews says, hey, Lois, how do you explain a comment by the former president, quote, I talk to Hillary, that's his wife.
I talk to Hillary almost every day.
He does.
What does that mean, though?
What does it mean to say you talk to your spouse almost every day?
What does that mean to say something like that?
I think they're extremely close.
They're of one mind.
I'm not asking about that.
Are they living on the same planet?
Do they ever see each other physically?
Oh, yes, yes, yes.
Come on.
They're a partnership.
Because, look, she's a senator.
She goes home on weekends.
He's traveling around.
But they are, they are, make no mistake about it.
They are a partnership and they are a love story.
I mean, regardless of anything else that's happening.
Oh, how many?
Is it 20 days a year?
How many days are they actually together in the same roof overnight, if you will?
I think that I saw a report that said it was about half a month.
A year.
Yeah.
Well, a half a month every month.
So whatever.
I would recheck the reporting.
Is that what you got, Jonathan, and you're reporting that they're together half the time overnight?
This is not, again, something they like to talk about that much, but that it's a little bit less than that.
I seem to recall a figure that was 70 days a year.
Sounds like the perfect marriage to me.
70 days a year that you under the same roof with your spouse.
You notice Lois Romano.
I know Lois Romano.
I've had pleasant experiences with her when she's been acting as a journalist, and I have been acting as the target and as the victim.
But, oh, they're a love story.
Oh, despite all that's happened, they're a love story.
They don't even need to talk.
They're so on the same plane that they don't even need to talk in order to be able to communicate.
All right.
You know, I just forgot to get to this point I wanted to make about Leonardo DiCaprio and Danny Glover and their, especially Glover, going down to Venezuela, getting $18 million to direct a film.
It's on the epic slave revolt, by the way, and it's designed to really attack Western civilizations, cultures as imperialistic and oppressive.
We got Jonathan Edwards, John Edwards, charging $55,000 to speak at the University of California at Davis about poverty.
$55,000 speech fee to talk about poverty.
We are loaded today.
We've got an immigration stack, but I'm trying not to lead with it because I don't want to become a one-note samba on that because progress is being made.
We'll continue to talk about it right after this.
Sit tight.
I can remember a year ago, six months ago, maybe 12 months ago, 13 or 14 months, a little over a year maybe, friends of mine panicking over Senator McCain and his candidacy.
What rush?
I mean, this is horrible.
He's not a conservative.
I said, don't worry.
Don't worry.
Senator McCain will implode at some point.
And I think the implosions have begun.
He's imploding here at Romney, accusing Romney of flip-flopping.
He imploded with Cornyn.
What that was all about was here are these guys in the Senate, the Republicans in the Senate are trying their best to hold their own.
Some of them are on this negotiation on the immigration deal with the Democrats and Ted Kennedy.
And McCain's out there missing all kinds of Senate votes, and he's out there running around campaigning.
And he's really intensely out of town because he hasn't raised as much money as he wanted or needed.
His fundraising light.
And all of a sudden, at the last minute, at the 11th hour, he buzzes into town, heads into the negotiation room, and starts talking about what this happened, this should happen.
And Cornyn said to him, look, you fly in here after being out of town for three months, start telling us what we're going to do.
Get in line, pal, something to that effect.
And, you know, and here came the F-bomb from McCain.
McCain, I know more about this legislation.
Anybody in this room?
He got that chamber.
He got it.
It just blew up.
And that got reported.
McCain's people try to downplay it.
Even some of the Republican senator staffers try to downplay it, obviously.
And now the Romney flip-flop.
And I've seen stories.
I haven't reported them or haven't shared them with you, but there have been stories in the last couple of weeks about McCain's health.
Writing about his inability to get off his straight talk express bus smoothly.
He got a bum knee, not moving around as fluidly as he used to.
And they're beginning to wonder.
Some people in the drive-bys are starting to speculate, hey, is his age becoming a factor here?
70 years old now, I think, and he's had two bouts of melanoma.
This story about John Edwards, too.
Now, let's look and see where this story comes from, shall we?
This is from the San Francisco Chronicle.
The San Francisco Chronicle qualifies as the drive-by media.
Democrat presidential candidate John Edwards, who as a Democrat presidential candidate recently proposed an educational policy that urged every financial barrier be removed for American kids who want to go to college, has been going to college himself as a high-paid speaker.
The candidate charged a whopping $55,000 to speak to a crowd of 1,700 at the taxpayer-funded UC Davis on January 9th, 2006, last year.
Now, this is just coming out.
Now, why is this being reported?
I mean, the drive-bys didn't go out and sniff this out.
This is in his financial reporting information.
Why are they reporting it?
Normally, sweep this stuff under the rug.
He's one of their guys.
John Fund has a piece today, the Wall Street Journal, speculating that it's getting even too much, getting to be even too much for the drive-bys to ignore and to look the other way.
The guy is such a blatant hypocrite.
He goes to this hedge fund where he ostensibly is going to learn about poverty.
He doesn't do anything.
He's at an offshore hedge fund.
He's got statements on the record opposing tax shelters that are brought about by having offshore hedge funds.
Like he goes to work for one.
After he comes out of his little consultancy deal there, making whatever $400 and some odd thousand dollars, I think he made.
He said he learned about poverty.
What did he learn about offshore hedge funds and in tax shelters and so forth?
He claims to want to put down.
Then there was the story about, you know, he's after bashing Walmart all the hell, and one of his staffers is sent to Walmart to get a PlayStation 2 or 3 or something for one of Edwards' kids.
And Fund's theory is that they're beginning to wonder if the guy's not just a total and utter phony.
The Chronicle noted that parents might be excused for wondering, given that the University of California system is being hit with a 7% tuition increase that'll impact a lot of struggling students.
Why didn't Edwards offer to do his speech gratis for a public institution?
The senator's office wouldn't comment, but journalists covering Mr. Edwards have lately started connecting certain dots.
Sooner or later, the public's going to have to make a decision about whether Edwards, with his $400 haircuts, his 29,000 square foot house, his lucrative hedge fund employment, walks the populist walk that he talks.
Now, this is Joe Klein, a columnist at Time magazine.
Other reporters recall on the same day last November, Edwards participated in a union conference, conference call, criticizing Walmart.
One of his staffers tried to obtain a coveted PlayStation 3 console for his family by calling the local Walmart and bypassing the hordes of ordinary Americans patiently waiting in line.
And then Edwards issued a bizarre statement claiming the staffer was acting apparently without our knowledge.
Former senator either knew what was being done in his name or he didn't.
The fact that this stuff is being reported, and you can say some of it's coming from Clinton Inc., and you can say that some of Hillary's out there got her pals in the drive-bys and they want to take out as many of Hillary's opponents as quickly as possible.
And by the way, remember that press conference when John Edwards and his wife Elizabeth announced the return of her cancer.
And the drive-bys started speculating about how great this was politically.
What a wonderfully executed political press conference and how it was going to buy, they're all saying this, how it's going to buy a little cover for Senator Edwards.
He's going to be a little bulletproof now because how do you go out and attack a guy politically whose wife just announced that her cancer's coming?
Well, it's happening.
I guess there was a little grace period there, but now it's happening.
And it's the drive-bys that are doing this.
The guy is phony.
I mean, there's no two ways about it.
It's stunning to me that the drive-bys have turned on him.
I guess it shouldn't be.
I mean, they don't want him.
The drive-bys candidate of choice right now, believe it or not, is Al Gore.
I mean, they're literally going bonkered.
What do you think Matthews is doing?
That bit that we played for you last night about Hillary and Bill and how often they stay under the same roof at night.
And Time magazine has been going on and on and on about Al Gore and all that.
And Obama has been built up.
It strikes me that there's not a whole lot of love and affection for Mrs. Clinton.
Now, this could be that they're just trying to provide obstacles for her to overcome and make it look like she's not the candidate of inevitability, that she can get into fights and win these things.
But it doesn't look like she can on her own.
She has to send Bill out to fundraise to make campaign appearances for her.
And drive-bys end up, they always end up touting and supporting the wrong guy.
Al Gore in 2000, Kerry in 2004.
And they always, if you listen to drive-bys, they will come through and pick a Democrat presidential loser, I'd say eight out of 10 times.
Now, this Danny Glover business, because it really is interesting in the sense that it is a marked change among the liberals and the leftists from what used to be.
Venezuela is going to give the American actor Danny Glover about $18 million, $17.8 million, to make a movie about a slave uprising in Haiti with President Hugo Chavez hoping the historical picture will sprinkle Hollywood stardust on his effort to mobilize world public opinion against imperialism and Western oppression.
Not his alleged opinion of, I know his opinion, of the alleged imperialism and Western oppression.
No, this is, by the way, the UK Guardian.
And of course, they don't even question the notion that we are an imperialist nation and that we are oppressors.
The Venezuelan Congress said it would use the proceeds from a recent bond sale with Argentina to finance Danny Glover's movie of an iconic figure in the Caribbean in Haiti who led an 18th century revolt there.
It'll also give seed money for a film version of The General in His Labyrinth, a novel about the last days of Simón Bolivar, who liberated much of South America from Spanish colonialism.
Then we've got Leonardo DiCaprio.
And his new movie is called The 11th Hour.
We don't often do movie reviews here, but these are too good to pass up.
His new movie is The 11th Hour.
It's supposed to help you grasp the urgency of saving the planet from the bogus notion that a few degrees of higher temperatures will destroy life as we know it.
This movie claims we are going to go extinct.
Humanity is on the brink of extinction.
And one of the stars of this movie is the former Soviet leader Mikhail Segeevich Gorbachev.
And his role in the movie is to persuade viewers that average human beings have caused horrific damage to the environment.
Now, how?
Average human beings have caused horrific damage to the environment simply by improving their standards of living.
Now, in this movie about the extinction of the human race, one of the stars, Mikhail Gorbachev, will not talk about the proven harm, the genocide that occurred in his own country.
They inflicted massive amounts of genocide on their own people, and they scorched the earth in a number of wars.
Death toll in the tens of millions.
A track record of rampant corruption, widespread pollution.
Talk about oppression.
How about the former Soviet Union?
But of course, none of that will be referenced by Mikhail Gorbachev, former Soviet commie boss.
No, he's going to target you and me and every other American he thinks is average for destroying the planet.
He's going to be treated as a visionary, not as an apologist for communism.
DiCaprio, by the way, credits Al Gore with educating him on global warming.
So you've got Al Gore educating the Sponge DiCaprio, and then DiCaprio will educate the sponge that goes watch his movies.
And so that propaganda train just keeps chugging on down the track.
It's too bad that guy out in L.A. didn't park his car in front of the propaganda train and try to derail it.
But you can't ask for everything.
But what's different about this?
You recall, and there have been countless movies about this and books.
All the liberals in Hollywood spent decades trying to convince the American public and countless congressional hearings, committees, that they weren't in bed with the communists, that they weren't secret members of the Communist Party USA, that this was blacklisting to say this about them.
It was horrible character assassination.
And to go out and say this and ruin people's careers, why we can't have now.
After decades of trying to make us believe that they had no contact with them whatsoever, now they are embracing communists as a badge of honor.
They're accepting money to go make their propaganda movies.
In the case of Danny Glover, still can't catch a cab in New York.
And DiCaprio, who's just doesn't even need to be commented on.
This, to me, is a remarkable change.
And I think it's all part of the same evolution here of the American left.
They were able to live in the shadows.
They were able to lurk in the shadows, hide who they really were.
They can't any longer, and they're getting frustrated.
It's coming out and admitting it in any number of different ways.
It's all there for you to digest.
All you have to do is have the courage to believe what you are seeing.
Back in just a sec.
Having more fun than a human being should be allowed to have Rush Limbaugh on the cutting edge of societal evolution.
Joe Biden is back, says we need to go to Darfur.
We need to get out of Iraq and we need to go to Darfur.
Bob Kerry is back.
He's the president of the new school, a Democrat senator, former Democrat senator from Nebraska, has an amazing piece at opinionjournal.com today on the left's Iraq muddle.
Yes, it is central to the fight against Islamic radicalism, and it may be one of the best summations of where we are that I've read in a long time, and it comes from a Democrat.
At this year's graduation celebration at the new school in New York, Iranian lawyer, human rights activist, and Nobel laureate Shiren Ibadi delivered our commencement address.
This brave woman who has been imprisoned for her criticism of the Iranian government had many good and wise things to say to our graduates, which earned their praise.
But one applause line troubled me.
Mrs. Ibadi said, democracy cannot be imposed with military force.
What troubled me about this statement, a commonly heard criticism of U.S. involvement in Iraq, is that those who say such things seem to forget the good U.S. arms and weapons have done in imposing democracy on countries like Japan and Germany or Bosnia more recently.
Let me restate the case for this Iraq war from the U.S. point of view.
The U.S. led an invasion to overthrow Saddam Hussein because Iraq was rightly seen as a threat following 9-11.
For two decades, we had suffered setbacks by radical Islamic groups.
We were lulled into a false sense of complacency because all previous attacks were over there.
It was our nation and our people who had been identified by bin Laden as the head of the snake, but suddenly Middle Eastern radicals had demonstrated extraordinary capacity to reach our shores.
No matter how incompetent the Bush administration, no matter how poorly they choose their words to describe themselves and their political opponents, Iraq was a larger national security risk after 9-11 than it was before, says Bob Kerry.
Member of the 9-11 Commission.
And no matter how much we might want to turn the clock back and either avoid the invasion itself or the blunders that followed, we can't.
The war to overthrow Saddam Hussein is over.
What remains is a war to overthrow the new government of Iraq.
Some who have been critical of this effort from the beginning have consistently based their opposition on their preference for a dictator we can control or contain at a much lower cost.
The critics who bother me the most, though, are those who ordinarily would not be on the side of supporting dictatorships, who are arguing today that only military intervention can prevent the genocide of Darfur, or who argued yesterday for military intervention in Bosnia, Somalia, and Rwanda to ease the sectarian violence that was tearing those places apart.
He's talking about Joe Biden here, who is out there saying we need to go into Darfur.
That's what I would do if he's elected president, he says.
And Bob Kerry here is putting these guys under the lights.
As American liberals need to face these truths, the demand for self-government was and remains strong in Iraq, despite all our mistakes and the violent efforts of al-Qaeda, Sunni insurgents, and Shiite militias to disrupt it.
Al-Qaeda, in particular, has targeted for abduction and murder those who are essential to a functioning democracy.
School teachers, aid workers, private contractors working to rebuild the infrastructure, cops, anybody who cooperates with the Iraqi government.
Much of Iraq's middle class has fled the country in fear.
With these facts on the scales, what does your conscience tell you to do?
If the answer is nothing, that it is not our responsibility or that this is all about oil, then no wonder today we Democrats are not trusted with the reins of power.
American lawmakers who are watching public opinion tell them to move away from Iraq as quickly as, I don't believe that, Bob.
Otherwise, the Democrats wouldn't keep pulling away from a definite withdrawal.
They can't get that done.
It's not the will of the people to get out of there and lose.
The will of the people of this country is not for the defeat of this country or for the U.S. military.
Those who argue that radical Islamic terrorism has arrived in Iraq because of the U.S.-led invasion are right, but they are right because radical Islam opposes democracy in Iraq.
If our purpose had been to substitute a dictator who was more cooperative and supportive of the West, these groups wouldn't have lasted a week.
So he rakes them over the coals.
Bob Kerry does Wall Street Journal today, actually opinionjournal.com, so we'll be able to link to it.
Well, you can go there now and read it yourself if you wish.
I told you there's smarter people in the Democratic Party than what you're hearing about, and they know that the Democrats are on a suicide mission with this.
And this is one of the first efforts I've seen to try to prevent the suicide led by Nancy Pelosi and Dingy Harry.
Sitting here a little irritated, folks, at some of the name-calling going on, even from the elites on our side about people like you and me on this whole immigration debate.
I want to talk about that when we come back.
That and many other things, too.
I speak of many things on this program.
We never stop.
▲
Export Selection