No, you tell them I'll talk to them when I'm good and ready.
I'm tired of being hassled and bothered by those people, and I'm not going to put up with it.
You just tell them that.
You could have told me this before the break was over.
That's just great.
Start the hour off with a rotten attitude.
That's exactly what we need.
Live from the Southern Command in sunny South Florida.
It's Open Line Friday.
And here's your telephone number.
800-282-2882, the email address, rush at EIBNet.com.
Here we are having more fun than a human being should be allowed to have.
We have to your phone calls in this hour as well.
I still got some debate soundbites.
I got other soundbites.
Yes, I do.
I have a few other soundbites besides that.
Now, I want to go back, ladies and gentlemen, to March 4th of 2007.
This is Mrs. Bill Clinton at the First Baptist Church in Selma addressing this portion of her remarks that she made at that commemorative rally.
I don't feel no ways tired.
I come too far from where I started from.
Nobody told me that the road would be easy.
I don't believe he brought me this far to leave me.
And of course, this is a new aspect of Mrs. Clinton's talent.
We were all dazzled by this, this ability to speak in dialects.
It turns out that Mrs. Clinton actually has a school or a system that you can buy it and learn to do exactly what she does.
Mrs. Bill Clinton, the vocal interpretation there, Lynette Joe, am I having a mental block?
Who sent Coleman's?
Loretta Lynn.
Jeez, Liz, that would be embarrassing.
Have some more debate audio soundbites.
This is the answer that Rudy gave to the incessant, never-ending questions posed by Chris Matthews on Roe versus Wade that he is getting clobbered for in certain circles.
A question to Rudy from Chris Matthews.
Would the day that Roe v. Wade is repealed be a good day for America?
I'm hearing it.
How about you?
We've had a computer freeze, ladies and gentlemen.
Sabotage at the EIB network.
The Giuliani.
Oh, you got it fixed.
All right.
So here's the question again.
Chris Matthews says to Rudy, would the day that Rofi Wade is repealed be a good day for America?
It'd be okay.
Okay to repeal.
It would be okay to repeal.
Would it be okay also if a strict constructionist judge viewed it as precedent?
And I think a judge has to make that decision.
Would it be okay if they didn't repeal it?
I think the court has to make that decision, and then the country can deal with it.
We're a federalist system of government and states could make their own decisions.
Well, they're being clobbered for this because he seemed to say, yeah, get rid of it.
But if a judge doesn't get rid of it, then no big deal.
Let the states deal with it.
And he's stumbled on that a little bit.
The drive-bys are all over.
You know, this abortion question, I mean, as I said earlier, the whole question stems from their cliched stereotypical beliefs.
They still think that abortion is something 80% of the American people are in favor of.
They're really living in such a dream world.
And their purpose here was to trip Rudy up.
He should have known that this was coming, and I'm sure he did.
And his answer, actually, this also kind of makes it.
How many of the American people, including whatever the small audience watching this debate last night, knows what the concept of federalism is?
How many of you know what the concept of federalism is?
You know it, Mr. Snurdley, well enough to explain it to me.
You do.
You do.
Give it to me in two sentences.
What is federalism?
You tell me.
I'll see if you're right.
Okay, well, you're pretty close.
You're pretty close.
I'm dead on.
I wonder how the term federalism, I just wonder how many people understand it.
His falling back on it, we're a federalist system of government.
The states can make their own decisions.
Well, no, not in a federalist system.
The states don't always get to make their own decisions.
And even if a one of the things I'm not heard this, but if Roe v. Wade is not repealed and the court makes that decision, or I guess it's talking about if it is repealed, then the states can do that.
And that's the way it ought to happen, by the way.
It ought to be something decided democratically by the people, and it never has been.
Let's see.
Now we have Matthews, this exchange with the candidates.
We had a montage earlier of some of the silly questions that were asked, and this is a montage of the silly question about would it be good for America to have Bill Clinton back living in the White House?
Do you think Scooter Libby should be pardoned?
Would you have fired Don Rumsfeld before?
No, It can't be my fault, but I'll take the hit.
I want to go to 13 and 14.
13 and 14.
I'm sure it was another computer glitch.
I knew this was going to happen.
I knew this was going to happen.
Right as I'm starting the segment, I get this message that people that I have no desire to talk to have been wanting.
And I've been telling people, you tell them I've got no desire to talk to them.
I'm reining it in.
Are we ready to go on Soundbites 13 and 14?
All right.
Seriously, would it be good for America to have Bill Clinton back living in the White House?
You've got to be kidding.
No, I'm not.
I know that he is presently measuring the drapes of renewable office, but no, it's a lousy idea.
Now, post-debate, Matthews was stunned.
He was amazed that the Clinton question was laughed at.
Here he is talking with Jill Zuckman of the Chicago Tribune.
When you mentioned Bill Clinton, it was like they all giggled.
You know, they all thought a bunch of things, and then nobody wanted to say anything.
And they turned up.
It was like pushing a button with.
But it's such a cultural question because if you said Bill Clinton to say an African-American crowd, it would be devotional, the response.
If you said it to a group of sophisticated big city liberals, it would be, look what he's doing for World AIDS.
It's a different cultural reaction.
They think it's comical, the name Bill Clinton.
They think it's comical.
Another great display, great illustration here of the two worlds.
Well, no, God is devotionally devoted.
They're devoted to God for black people.
Actually, that's Barack.
Barack is godlike for the godless.
But what he meant was that Clinton was the first black president, that there's reverence for Clinton out there.
And these Republicans all laughed at the notion.
And Matthews, it can't.
It doesn't compute.
Just doesn't compute.
Folks, there is such a huge difference.
This is why when you watch these people, you have got to understand where they are coming from.
And it's not enough just to note their bias and so forth.
You have to, because it informs virtually every report and story that they do.
It's actually the best advice I could give you is just ignore it.
Don't watch the stuff anymore.
It's not what you think it is.
It's not news.
It's not, there's nothing information.
It's agenda.
It's pure agenda.
You're just going to have your blood pressure skyrocket if you keep watching this stuff.
All right, it's open line Friday, and that means we go to the phones.
You own it.
Show is yours, 800-282-2882.
And this is Tom in Toms River, New Jersey.
Great to have you, sir.
Hey, Rush, how are you doing?
Hey.
My call.
Good.
Thank you.
On Wednesday about Cuba, and it reminded me, I wanted to let you know about a little story.
But when I was there in 1991, I was there for 30 days working on the Pan Am games.
We had special visas to go there.
And just an illustration of how communism doesn't work.
This kid from the hotel invited me to come to his house for dinner.
I couldn't leave the hotel with him.
I had to meet him there.
And he lived with his new bride and his parents in this apartment in Alabama.
And we sat down, we had a drink, and had a little conversation.
He didn't really speak English, but his father had lived in Brooklyn for several years.
So we sit down to eat, and about halfway through the dinner, I noticed that his mother is not eating with us.
So I asked, I said, where is your mom?
And his father translated.
He said, oh, she had to go to work.
He said, okay, I didn't think anything of it.
A few minutes later, I get up to go to the bathroom.
I walk to the back of the apartment.
I think I know where this is headed.
As I'm getting to the bathroom, okay, I look at the door open to crack, and his mother is in there watching TV.
In order for them to have me for a guest for dinner, I ate her dinner that night.
That's how well communism works.
They were rationed their food.
Now, I didn't say anything.
I don't want to embarrass him.
I finished dinner.
You know what I thought you were going to say was that she was out doing tricks because a lot of women in Havana have resorted to prostitution to earn money.
All the women that were there, the women that were there wanted to try and pick us up.
They didn't want money.
They wanted us to take us into the tour shops to buy them clothes for their kids because the only merchandise to buy in Cuba was in the tourist shops in the hotel.
I went into a pharmacy in Altabana.
I never saw so many empty shelves in my life.
When I came back to this country, the first place I went was.
Wait, Did you just say you walked into a pharmacy and saw empty shelves?
Yes, empty shelves.
How can that be?
They've got world-class health care down there.
Oh, I got their free health care when I was there because I picked up some kind of bacteria like Montezuma's Revenge or something.
And they saw me in the hotel, didn't charge me anything, but the medicine didn't do anything.
Why did you stay?
I was working there for 30 days.
I worked for ABC TV.
I'm an engineer, so I was there doing the Pan Am games.
I was there for 30 days working.
Oh, I see.
You had no choice.
I could have gone if I wanted.
I wasn't that sick.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
How were the.
What hotel did you stay at?
The Libra.
We used to be the Hilton.
I forget the day.
It was the Libra something.
It used to be the Hilton Hotel.
Yeah, the Cuba Libra.
Cuba Libra, right?
When we left, as we were leaving, we were pulling out all the cables.
Our TV compound was right down the street from the hotel.
As we left, we had to go into this room, and in this room, there were dishes that were piled there that must have been there for years, covered with cockroaches.
Well, I don't remember watching the Pan Am games.
You said this was in 1991, did you say?
1991, yeah, it wasn't very popular.
It didn't really get to the point.
Did ABC film any of the, you know, they always do human interest stories and cultural portrayals for their audience here in America.
Did they show any of this that you saw?
No, it was basically sports coach.
I think most of the Cuff West.
Yeah, but I mean, when you turn on the Olympics, 75% of it is, you know, Alberto Tosca trying to hit on Katrina Witt and shows what he's doing in the nightlife back in his hometown in Italy while he's training and so forth.
That's what half the Olympics is.
Yeah, it didn't get, they didn't get the sponsorship I think they wanted.
It wound up, they were doing a lot of feeds for like South American countries and stuff.
It really didn't make much air in the U.S.
Oh, okay.
Well, the South American countries already know the truth.
It would have been great for guys like Charlie Wrangell to see it, though.
Well, nobody, I'm still amazed that people still have to hear the truth about communism.
I'm amazed that people are still stunned by it when they hear that.
I appreciate the call out there, Tom.
Poplar Grove, Illinois.
This is Mary, nice to have you with us.
Uh-oh, this sounds like a deadline.
Oh, there you are.
I'm here.
Sounded like a deadline to me.
Megadidos from Illinois, Rush.
It's an honor to speak with you.
Thank you very much.
My question or comment is somewhat off the topics you've been addressing today.
No, that's what Open Line Friday is.
There's no topics on it.
I don't know if you have heard the problem that we've been having with the bees.
And it's not only our country, it's other countries also, the bees that are disappearing.
Yeah, we talked about this a little bit last week.
And there's a line in the story about this mysterious bee disappearance that is attributed to Einstein.
It says if the bees went away, that humanity would expire in four to five years, and we couldn't survive without them.
And Einstein never said it.
One of these things that one of these popular myths that's circulating, it might be true, but Einstein didn't say it.
I'm seeing more and more stories.
Not more and more.
I've seen a couple since that original story that think this is really exaggerated and overblown.
One of them was of a beekeeper, I think, in North Carolina, whose bees are swarming everywhere.
He hadn't lost any bees.
They're all over the place.
And he is quoted in this story, I think, as saying that it's as much ado about nothing.
But, you know, I, like you, when I saw it, I got sucked in.
And I am Rush Limboy.
I understand a drive-by media.
And I got sucked in.
I was believing.
I know how hard it is to resist this stuff.
It was just more doom and gloom.
And of course, that line in there, we're going to die in four to five years as a human race.
Whoa, I didn't know that.
I didn't know that bees were, you know, I mean, they're important and so forth, as are all great living organisms on this wonderful planet.
But I was totally taken in by it because I didn't stop to think, and it's got to be from the global warming crowd.
There was no allusion to that in this story, see?
And it wasn't until I saw another story saying this is a little bit overblown and very, very exaggerated.
I said, yeah, of course it is.
It's somebody put in his head.
Of course, it's got to be global warming that's causing the problems with the mysterious vanishing bees out there.
So at this stage, Mary, I don't know what the truth of this is.
And that, I think, is a great indictment of the drive-by media and how these stories go.
I know that 90% of global warming news is a hoax.
90% of the news on Global about the melting glaciers, the polar bears, all of these, the amount of carbon emissions put in the air by automobiles is zilch compared to what's put in by nature, water, vapor, other other forms.
So even I.
The great El Rushball was taken in.
I apologize for that, too.
I'm glad you called.
Back in a sec.
Half my brain tied behind my back, just to make it fair.
Rushlin Boy on the cutting edge of societal evolution.
Now, try this story.
This is from the Associated Press.
The story says, Mexico has lost more people to migration to the United States than to death since the year 2000.
This, according to a government report released yesterday.
The only problem with this is they're not lost.
Everybody knows where they are.
If you want them back, come get them.
But the statistic is amazing.
Mexico has lost more people to migration to the United States than death since 2000.
Immigration to the U.S. has increased drastically since 1970 when 800,000 Mexicans live north of the border.
Today there are about 11 million, give or take, living in the U.S., both legally and illegally, the report found.
Study also showed more and more Mexicans traveling illegally.
Oh, really?
I don't know if we didn't know that.
More and more Mexicans, do you see this?
AP has it, folks.
More and more Mexicans traveling illegally to the United States.
It's amazing what you can learn when you tune in to the drive-by media.
Try this headline.
Where's this?
UK again, the Telegraph.
Modern life has turned children into loners.
Children are struggling to make friends at Scroole because they spend too long playing computer games and listening to MP3 players, according to teachers.
An increase in solitary pastimes has damaged children's social skills and fueled feelings of loneliness among a generation of young people, they say.
According to the charity, a rise in solitary activities has meant doom and gloom for these people because they're turning into loners.
They don't play games anymore, like hopscotch, tag, and football.
Of course not.
They've been banned, haven't they?
You can certainly hurt yourself playing hopscotch.
Tag, it's unfair to call somebody it.
And football, why goes, they haven't banned the Dodgeball if they ever played it over there.
So, what do we have here?
And by the way, isn't this, don't we always get this story shortly after some lunatic goes on a shooting spree?
I'll never forget when John Hinckley shot President Reagan.
Yeah, you know, he was a loner.
Never said much to anybody.
Well, surprised everybody.
Well, his parents said he never ever got into trouble.
He was all quiet and reserved, always kept to himself.
This is nothing new.
This is another one of these recycled stories.
Just like every year, Reuters recycles the pay inequity between men and women, and they calculate what women earn in the home and are not paid for.
They recycle it every year.
This gets recycled every time some wacko goes on a shooting spree.
By the way, if you have a kid, you know, Hinkley's parents, they were all, they were both just shocked.
Well, he never got in any trouble.
You got a kid that never gets into trouble, get a straitjacket.
Because that, I'm telling you, that is not normal to not get in trouble.
It's not normal.
But to say that this is new, I've heard these complaints about television.
In fact, kids today are a bunch of fat slobs because they're watching television.
Only recently have they added video games and iPods to this.
This recycled psycho-babble is all this is.
There's always going to be loners.
Not everybody's going to be a Bill Clinton walking around sniffing up.
Some people are going to be spending time alone.
They just do it.
It's who they are for whatever reason.
Some of them are sick.
Some of them aren't.
Some of them prefer it.
Some of them think other people are absolutely a waste of time.
But to say that there's some deep-rooted psychological problem.
The only deep-rooted psychological problem you need to worry about is if your kid never gets into trouble, find a way for the kid to get into trouble and enjoy it.
Go through the hell.
The natural thing.
Experts.
This is from the French news agency.
Experts always have that word in every drive-by story.
Experts say nations have means to tackle global warming.
Nations have the money and the technology to save the world from the worst ravages of global warming, but they must start acting immediately to succeed.
The options laid out covered simple measures like switching to energy-efficient light bulbs and adjusting the thermostat in the office.
I read a story, by the way, in the local paper here that, you know, malls and so forth use cooling towers.
We got a drought where we live, folks.
And so they're going to make people turn to thermo, the malls and these public places, the thermostat up 78% at 78 degrees, thinking about it.
I also saw that the water restrictions we're under, which are guaranteed to cause your grass to die, may become permanent.
INIKE I saw it on, I was watching, what was I watching?
Must have been lost.
And I watched one of these promos for the local news.
And of course, here came the scare headline, why current water restrictions might become permanent, in all caps.
Now, experts have a means to tackle global warming.
All this is, is, yeah, tax increases.
When they have the means to tackle global warming, what they mean is nations have taxes that they can levy under the guise of global warming.
Speaking of that, East Coast lawmakers banded together yesterday in a bid to short-circuit a federal decision making it easier to build major power lines.
Now, why would somebody want to stand in the way of this?
We need energy for crying out loud.
From New York to Virginia, there is a prospect of new high-voltage line construction after the Energy Department last week proposed a national interest electric transmission corridor.
A 2005 law gives the government new authority to approve line construction, even if state officials object, a little federalism there.
Various projects up and down the East Coast have met fierce local resistance.
On Thursday, some lawmakers said they try to use the annual federal spending bill for water and energy to bar the government from going forward with the plan.
Now, the law establishing the electricity corridor is designed to relieve bottlenecks in the national power grid, decreasing the threat of blackouts like the one that swept from Ohio to New York City in 2003.
Now, this, I read this kind of story, and it convinces me that we have our share of blithering idiots in this country.
Because if this does, we had all these people that were fried.
They were roasted.
They were mad as hell after that blackout, and nobody could figure out what had happened and how it could have been stopped.
And why wasn't power restored?
It was a week long, I think, in some parts of the country.
Maybe more.
So it's going to happen again.
And these same blithering idiots who are stopping progress here with power lines, who knows why, are going to be the first ones to bellyache and whine and moan about the next blackout.
And they're probably going to end up with a poll.
Well, a majority of Americans think that power lines are dangerous and shouldn't be.
Okay, then we don't do it.
A majority of ignorant idiots think we shouldn't have power lines.
Speaking of light bulbs, Stephen Malloy, The Washington Times, how much money does it take to screw in a compact fluorescent?
By the way, they got me a hotel suite yesterday because I had to change clothes after the two meetings and so forth.
They had about a half hour in there.
And I walked in, and the light switches were weird.
They function, but they turned lights on in different rooms.
I couldn't figure it out.
I didn't have time to figure it out.
And none of the lamps were on the switches.
So it's dark, moderately dark.
I'm walking in the room and I'm trying to find a switch on this lamp by the bedside.
And I can't, I'm feeling around under there, can't feel a switch.
So I searched a power cord.
Maybe the switch was on that.
I'm going to have to look down at the lamp.
I looked over the shade, and damned if there wasn't a compact fluorescent bulb in there.
I thought about unscrewing the thing and just leaving it there as a calling card.
And I finally found a switch.
It was on the base of the lamp.
So I turned it on.
It wasn't any big-time major light that came out of that.
What certainly wasn't enough.
Now, I know some of you sell them, and I'm not trying to run them down.
If you want to buy a compact fluorescent, you go right ahead.
Just don't tell me you're saving the planet when you do it because you're not.
Now, back to the story.
How much does it take to screw in a compact fluorescent light bulb?
About $4.28 for the bulb and the labor, unless you break the bulb.
And then, like Brandy Bridges of Ellsworth, Maine, you could be looking at a cost of about $2,408, which doesn't include the cost of frayed nerves and the risks to your health.
If this sounds crazy, perhaps it's no more than the stampede to ban the incandescent light bulb in favor of the CFLs, a move already either adopted or being considered in California, Canada, European Union, and Australia.
According to an April 12th article in the Ellsworth, Maine American, Brandy Bridges had the misfortune of breaking a CFL carbon or compact fluorescent bulb during installation in her daughter's bedroom.
It dropped, it shattered on the carpeted floor.
Now, she was aware that the bulb contained potentially hazardous substances, so she called a local Home Depot for advice.
The store told her that the bulb contained mercury, she should call the poison control hotline, which in turn told her to call the Maine Department of Environmental Protection.
The DEP sent a specialist to her house to test for mercury contamination and found mercury levels in the bedroom in excess of six times the state's safe level for mercury contamination of 300 billionths of a gram per cubic meter.
The DEP specialist recommended Brandy Bridges call an environmental cleanup firm.
Now, look at this.
She breaks a light bulb.
She's got to call four government agencies plus Home Depot.
This is exactly what liberals want to happen, by the way.
They want you to have to call a bureaucracy every time you do anything.
That's where they're headed.
So anyway, Brandy Bridges calls the environmental cleanup firm, gave her a low-ball estimate of $2,000 to clean up the room.
The room was then sealed off with plastic, and Brandy Bridges began gathering finances to pay for the $2,000 cleaning.
Reportedly, her insurance company wouldn't cover the cleanup costs because mercury is a pollutant and they don't ensure pollutants.
Given that replacing incandescent bulbs with these compact fluorescents in the average U.S. households touted as saving as much as $180 annually in energy costs, and assuming that Brandy Bridges doesn't break any more of these bulbs, it will take her more than 11 years to recoup the cleanup costs in the form of energy savings.
11 years.
Even if you don't go for the full-scale panic of the $2,000 cleanup, the do-it-yourself approach is still somewhat intense, if not downright alarming.
You consider the procedure offered by the Maine Department of Environmental Protection webpage said, What if I accidentally break a bulb in my house?
Don't vacuum bulb debris because a standard vacuum will spread mercury dust throughout the area and contaminate the vacuum.
You're supposed to ventilate the area and reduce the temperature, but you can't do that if you have to lower the thermostat too much because you're really making carbon footprint.
You then have to put on protective equipment like goggles, overalls, and a dust mask.
You then collect the waste material into an airtight.
This is the sixth thing you do.
If after you find out it's going to cost you two grand, you collect the waste material into an airtight container.
You pat the area with sticky side of tape.
You wipe with a damp cloth.
Finally, check with local authority.
So you got to come out anyway.
You got to call the seventh agency.
You got to call the hazmat people to see if you've done it right.
This is if you choose not to spend the two grand to have the hazmat people come out in the first place.
Now, we all break light bulbs.
You know, these things happen, folks.
They just happen.
You have been warned here.
You've been warned.
Well, you know, all of Washington is going into this weekend with bated breath because the DC Madam is going to name some names tonight on ABC.
That network is sex obsessed.
They gave us the Foley story.
They're doing a D.C. Madam story.
And already people are worried.
They're worried that my name might be on the list and so forth.
I don't know the whole list, but some prominent names are supposed to be released this week.
I think everybody misunderstands people that use these escort services.
Everybody.
You know, people that what they're all laughing on the other side, they think I'm heading for trouble again here.
Everybody misunderstands what this is about.
You know, you call an escort service, you call a madam, you call Heidi Fleis, they send a girl over.
You're not paying for the sex, folks.
These people that are doing this are not paying for the sex.
They are paying for the women to leave.
Paul in Redmond, Washington, welcome to the EIB Network.
Nice to have you with us.
Thanks, Gretch.
Appreciate you taking my call.
You bet, sir.
Hey, just a few quick comments I wanted to make on the debate last night.
First off, you know, I don't totally agree with any one of the candidates, but I was really proud of my party during that debate and afterwards.
These guys, they spoke straight and they spoke without hesitation.
They answered the questions directly and clearly.
They said what they thought.
They told you what they do.
It's such a utter contrast with the Democratic.
This is an excellent point that you're making.
You know, it's just, it was so clear.
And for people who can't observe that, then, you know, kind of wonder about their discernment.
Well, you know, this thing was more notable to me for the idiocy of the questions.
They were pointless.
They were agenda-oriented questions.
I know these guys know they're going to get what they're getting into with this, but it was so unprofessional.
It was just, it was a real come down.
And, you know, you are a prisoner to the questions.
You have to ask, you know, answer the ones you get.
They were stupid, but it is what it was.
And I think that takes down the whole, reduces the whole substative image of the event.
I appreciate the call out there, Paul.
I have time for one more.
This is Annie in Sarasota, Florida.
Nice to have you on the EIB network.
I got about a minute and a half here.
Hey, Rush, just want to let you know my husband's been listening to you since the first day you were on in Tampa on the FLA in the early 90s, and I couldn't stand you.
He made me listen, and I couldn't stand your high-pitched voice.
You drove me crazy, but I love you now, too.
Pitch a voice.
What are you talking about?
High-pitched voice.
There it is.
There it is, baby.
In fact, my mom, the die-hard 80-year-old Democrat in Massachusetts, he makes her listen, and she loves you now.
Well, what turned you around?
Well, what turned me around is your logic and your truth, and she says the same thing, too.
So the thing is, two weeks ago, my mom was listening to you, and you were advocating left-handed people.
You're going to make your mug a lefty mug.
Make it so we can read it when we hold it.
No.
And I just want to thank you.
Thank you.
No, You misunderstood.
It was manufactured that way incorrectly.
Oh, wow.
Because most people are right-handed.
You know, the left-handed women have a tendency to die early.
No, you know what?
I have written a book on that, and I even mailed it to you, and thanks for your advocacy.
But no, it's not true.
That was a false study, and my book actually proves it wrong.
And there's been studies to show we do not die younger.
Well, it was absurd.
Why put that story out?
That was just, it's part of the tumult, chaos, and the fear and panic that the media is focused on.
Thanks very much out there.
Yeah, I know.
I know.
We've got to go over into.
All right, folks, that's it.
Another one wrapped up in the can on the way over to the warehouse that's housing all the artifacts in a future broadcast museum.