All Episodes
Previous Next
April 18, 2007 - Rush Limbaugh Program
31:36
April 18, 2007, Wednesday, Hour #3
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
And greetings to you, thrill seekers, music lovers, conversationalists all across the fruited plain, limbaugh time as America's real Anchorman, a uh program here that meets and surpasses all audience expectations every day.
Our phone number if you want to join us, 800-282-2882, the email address rush at EIB net.com.
All right, we're running a poll.
The poll is up and running, and you can participate in it now at WW.rushlimbaug.com.
The uh Reverend Jackson, the Reverend Sharpton said last week during the IMAS flap that MSNBC, which is uh owned by NBC, just too white.
It's uh all n all white all night, uh, forget the rest of the phrase.
And they're right.
I mean, you have to agree with them, and these guys uh at MSNBC were the first to throw Imus overboard talking about how unfortunate it was he used all this racial language all the time, all this racism and stuff, and demanding more equity for minorities out there.
And of course, when you look at the prime time lineup at M SNBC, you see nothing but white, white, white, white, white.
And so these people are out there, they're good liberals, and they are they uh they're they're leaders.
They're among the smartest among us.
Uh they are the smartest among us, and and and they're they have the uh uh the the they're so right that they tell us how to live, tell everybody else in the country how to live, what they're doing wrong, what they need to correct, and so forth.
And so we thought that the only logical thing would be for one or two of those people who who host primetime shows on MSNBC to uh resign.
Uh out of the goodness of their hearts to uh show leadership to illustrate for the rest of the world how they are willing to sacrifice their own careers or jobs in order that minorities might have a fair shake in major media.
So we're running a poll.
Which MSNBC anchor should resign to make room for a minority host.
The choices are Chris Matthews, Tucker Carlson, and Keith Olberman.
And you can go there and vote now, and the vote tally is instant after you uh after you register your vote.
We will, of course, keep the poll open and running until tomorrow's program, at which time we will announce the results.
Now, this uh comes uh in conjunction with the opening today of the Reverend Sharpton's National Action.
What is it?
National National Umction Network Convention, four-day convention.
Uh all of the 08 Democrat presidential candidates will show up to address the assembled gathering at the National Action Network Convention.
The Reverend Sharpton is going to target rap lingo, rep lir.
Oh, I'll tell you something.
Snerdley and I were just talking during the uh break.
And we're in there watching uh one of the cable nets, and they're printing some of the stuff that the shooter at Virginia Tech wrote.
And I looked at the screen and I said, Yeah, this guy was just, he was clearly out of it.
And Snurdly looked at me and said, We are making hasty judgments.
And we are coming to a conclusion that may not be fair to the shooter.
Of course, I mouth fell open.
I said, What are you talking about, Bo?
This guy was clearly not not right.
He said, Well, if you just look at what this guy wrote, I defy you if somebody gave you a raw screenplay written by Quentin Tarantino, such as the Kill Bill Parts 1 and Part 2 movies, or if somebody gave you the raw screenplay to Natural Born Killers by Oliver Stone, would you conclude they're insane?
Would you conclude they've got a screw loose?
I mean, uh this guy's no different than uh than some of the trash coming out of Hollywood already, and I had to concede.
I had to concede, it's uh it's a pretty good point, although neither Quentin Tarantino nor Oliver Stone or any of their associates have gone on shooting sprees.
Uh but uh well, you never said if this guy he was in the wrong place, he should have been Hollywood.
I don't know.
Uh it just it it was an interesting point that I thought Mr. Snerdley made.
I wanted to pass it on to you.
Now, as you know, we we support Reverend Sharpton, Reverend Jackson here in their quest to um uh detoxify some of the airwaves that are out there, some of it's pure pure rubbish.
Uh one of those places is MSNBC, and there's certainly a shortage of minority talent and voices in prime time at MSNBC.
Most of the busy broadcast day, in fact, at MSNBC, and and uh we with this new association we have that Reverend Sharpton and Jackson, or they got this new firm called a Justice Brothers.
I want to play all three commercials that we are running for the Justice Brothers in order.
Well, the first one they gave us, the second one, they got a new one.
It did start this week.
Here are the three R. All right, that's the first spot.
By the way, I need to tell you about the poll we're running.
You vote one time.
You get one vote, but to see the vote continue to tally, just refresh the browser.
Just hit reload on your browser, and the vote tally will be updated in terms of uh of uh which MSNBC host is leading in terms of who you think should resign in order to make room for a minority in prime time at MSNBC.
Here's uh number two of the second commercial from the Justice Brothers.
All right, that's the second commercial from our new client, the Justice Brothers, and here's the spot.
We just got this yesterday uh to join the rotation today.
Interesting concept.
Go ahead and buy credits, insurance credits from the Justice Brothers, and they'll back you up if you happen to screw up on radio or TV.
As I said, the uh the National Action Network, Reverend Sharpton uh is he's he's I'll tell you what, uh said this last week.
He's aiming at rap music and the lyrics.
That's the focal point of one of the focal points of one of the sessions at at his National Action Network Conference.
I'll tell you what, the the the the the people he's aiming for are a little upset about this.
You know, the MTVs, the record companies and so forth, even some of the rappers, they don't dig what's happening here.
They think what they do is entirely different than when somebody else uses their terminology.
Uh and uh what they have to understand, you know, Reverend Sharpton's a brilliant man.
Uh and and if just by making this move, whether he achieves anything or not in the area of rap music, uh, he will have anointed himself with some credibility, some street cred, as they say, for the next real perpetrators or perpetrator that he targets.
Um, the next radio or television person, they'll be able to say, hey, look, we're not targeted radio guys, we're going everywhere we find it.
We even went after the rap music uh people.
So at any rate, and I'm sure the eight Democrat or the O eight Democrat presidential candidates, all of whom are attending uh Reverend Sharpton's National Action Network Convention will get their digs in on this uh as well.
But the point is the rap guys are gonna be in the crosshairs for a while during this convention.
And it'll be interesting to gauge their reaction to Reverend Sharpton and the Justice Brothers uh as opposed to others uh and the way they react.
Once again, our poll question at WWRush Limbaugh.com, which MSNBC anchor.
We do this in solidarity with Reverend Sharpton and Jackson, who've uh made a correct observation about the lack of minority talent hosting primetime programs on MSNBC, and we believe that these good liberals at MSNBC should show leadership and uh and resign, one or two of them to make way for a minority.
Uh show the rest of us how this is done.
So, and you can vote which MSNBC anchor should resign to make room for a minority host.
Chris Matthew, Chris Matthews, uh Tucker Carlson or Keith Olberman, uh uh W.rush Limbaugh.com to make your vote.
And after you voted, you get one vote, but just reload the browser and you'll see how the vote is going.
Be right back.
And welcome back, Rush Limbaugh Talent on lawn from God.
Back to the phones.
This is David from Parts Unknown in Pennsylvania.
Welcome to the EIB network, sir.
Hello, Rush.
This is a privilege.
Thank you, sir.
Uh I think you hit the nail on a the head again with implying that political correctness is causing paralysis to action.
I teach.
And we've noticed recently that students do not participate in class.
And this is at a bunch of colleges.
And we actually think that perhaps political correctness has gotten them into situation that any time they open their mouth, they're afraid they're going to get dumped on.
Or they're going to offend somebody, or they're going to make somebody mad, and that's going to lead to them getting dumped on.
That's right.
And I think it is a very uh good idea that you hit that nail on the head.
I think you're right on target.
Thank you very much.
I I appreciate that.
We if In case you missed this, I uh about an hour and a half ago I posited a theory that rather than ban guns, we need to ban political correctness.
We just need to get rid of it.
It leads to paralysis, it leads to fear, and it leads to people not being who they are.
You want give me a couple examples of it.
And this this these are true stories.
Uh London Sunday Times headline.
Don't stare at Muslims, says advice to schools.
Pupils and teachers have been told by an official body not to stare at Muslims for fear of causing offense.
A document intended to educate against religious intolerance and sectarianism urges teachers to make this quote, make pupils aware of the various forms of Islamophobia, i.e.
stares, verbal abuse, physical abuse.
Osama Saeed, a spokesman for the Muslim Association of Britain accused officials of going too far.
Look, there are more far more serious elements of Islamophobia.
People look at all sorts of things.
That can just be a glance.
A glance and a stare are two different things.
Glances happen naturally, but all sorts of things catch your eye, whereas a stare is probably gawking at something.
Personally, I've not encountered much of a problem with people staring.
I don't know how you would legislate for that.
That's not going to stop them.
I mean, good for him for speaking out.
But um don't stay they they're they're they're they're they they're not this is not going to be stopped.
I'm just telling you that the pupils and teachers, they will continue to be told don't stare at Muslims.
It might incite them.
Then try this from uh this was Tuesday's same paper, a different paper.
This is the UK telegraph.
Don't stare at the apes.
Zoo tells visitors.
Most people visit the zoos to see the animals, but visitors to Antwerp Zoo in Belgium are being told not to look at the apes.
Now here's why.
Visitors are now confronted with signs telling them that making prolonged eye contact with the apes leaves the apes sad and withdrawn.
Uh zoo staff reckons staring can result in the creatures becoming less sociable.
Uh multiculturalists usually claim to be respecting people from different cultures while in fact treating them with a decided lack of respect.
That's the conclusion of James Taranto at best of the web dot com.
So two different days, two different UK newspapers, don't stare at Muslims.
That's Islamophobia, and don't stare at the apes in a zoo.
Because the apes will become sad and withdrawn.
Well, I don't know if they're crying out.
How do you know if they're crying out for attention?
I I uh uh w why why yeah, just wink at them.
If you want to have eye contact with the apes, just wink at them.
Uh why stop the apes?
Don't wink, don't stare at the tigers.
Don't stare at the lions, don't stare at.
I mean, you could go even further.
Don't stare at your own pet.
Might cause your own pet to become sad and withdrawn.
Might give your own pet an inferiority complex.
This is this is these are the outgrowths of political correctness.
I said, I know it sounds funny, and it is, but these people are dead serious.
I it you know, there is insanity all over the place, and some of it is located in positions of power and authority all over our societies, the Western uh uh uh democracies.
Clyde and Boyse, Idaho, welcome to the EIB network, sir.
Hello there, how are you?
Good to talk to you.
Thank you.
You bet.
Listen, I've been listening to you, and I heard you talk about all the people that knew about this nut case in Virginia, and and nobody did anything, and I want to know if you'd have been one of those people that knew about him exactly directly.
What would have what would you have done?
What could have been done ahead of time?
You're talking about the Virginia Tech situation?
Yes.
Well, uh this is this is a this is a question actually for the people in uh in positions of authority there.
And they did uh do certain things.
They put him on antidepressants, and they did send him.
He went to a mental institution in 2005.
But uh none of that apparently had any impact or had any effect.
Uh but I know what you're getting at.
You're getting at, and it's a valid point.
There was there really any way to stop these things.
My my only point in mentioning this is that you don't forget the context.
Everybody said we got to ban the guns.
We've got to get the guns out of there.
I'm telling you, it's all kinds of information long before the guy started pulling the trigger that something wasn't right with him.
And so banning the guns, banning that that's not the solution to this at all.
It w it would have had no impact whatsoever.
In fact, they already have banned guns on that campus.
But this guy was able to go out and get one because the guy that sold him the gun didn't know anything about him.
The people at the school knew that something wasn't right about this guy.
Uh and I d I don't know what you do other than take him out of school and and institutionalize him.
His parents felt he was suicidal.
There were all kinds of warning signs.
What is what what is your ultimate point with this?
Have I touched on it or missed it?
The ultimate point is we I've heard other talk shows say that people were remiss in not doing anything, and I've been associated with the courts enough to know that we can't arrest a guy because someday he's going to kill somebody.
And uh No, we're not talking about it.
We're not talking about nobody's talking about arresting him.
We're doing this the context of either sequestering him or getting him some serious help.
And and the the talk of paralysis enters the fray, enters the picture when we start introducing the notion of political correctness.
Well, because we don't want to be critical because it might hurt his feelings, it might set him off.
Yeah, I understand that.
Okay.
I just wanted to know if you had a solution that I mean, if I'd have been there and knew this guy, there's not much I could do either.
So I I hear all the criticism about why did everybody let this go on?
Well, there's not a whole lot in society that can be done.
Hmm.
We got the ACLU and attorneys, and we got the Constitution, and we can't just jump in and do something involuntarily on these people.
Uh well, you know what?
You're inadvertently making the case for what people here are saying, because you're going to have people like the ACLU come along if the school had tried to do anything to sequester the kid until he could have been, you know, properly analyzed and and uh treated uh and so forth.
He might have been able to get some ACLU lawyers.
I don't know.
That's that's speculation, too.
But you're you're you're illustrating the problem.
At the same time, you're making a point.
I mean, I have people email me today.
Well, if we don't get rid of the guns, we're just gonna have an okay corral every day.
We don't have an okay corral in this country.
We got all kinds of guns out there, video games and everything else.
Thanks, Clyde, we'll be back.
Hi, we're back.
The poll continues.
W.rush Limbaugh.com.
Which MSNBC anchor should resign to make room for a minority host.
Chris Matthews, Tucker Carlson, or Keith Ulberman.
800-282-2882 if you want to be on the program.
All right.
All right, the last caller.
The last caller.
The question is actually the point.
We said, Well, what would you do?
What would you do?
There's nothing that can be done, he said.
That's the whole point.
We need tort reform, we need ACLU reform, we need political correctness reform.
Now, the the question is this.
Why can't somebody who is not right as demonstrated uh an imbalanced nut case as this shooter was, why can't he be expelled from campus?
Now they didn't do it.
If you think he can be expelled from campus, he didn't do it.
Politic political.
They can he well.
All right.
All right.
Well, they can do it.
Look at the Duke guys.
They expelled the Duke guys from it.
Can be done.
Political correctness, though.
That's the whole point.
You can get rid of the Duke guy, they're not a minority.
They were accused of a template crime.
Of course you get rid of it.
You know, in fact, the Lynch mob at that university.
Thomas Sole has a great column today.
The Lynch Mob, the professors, the administration at Duke University.
Now many of them are trying to say, We never, we never tried to railroad those boys.
We never.
It's one thing to be a minute of a member of a lynch mob, and then you don't admit it when the lynch mob is proved wrong.
But I'll tell you what, the administration on that campus and some of those professors, the 88 that signed that letter, they're a disgrace.
They are a disgrace.
But the whole point of what there's nothing can be done.
What would you do?
Look at here's here's the way to look at this.
Why can't the media look for solutions to this problem?
Why can't we get nut cases off campus?
Why can't Congress, led by Diane Feinstein, get serious about this?
I want to get serious about gun control again.
I want to get that's nothing but a political agenda for them.
Solving the problem is nothing they're interested in.
You know, to expend all this energy and attention on guns, we can't even remove a known nut case from a college campus.
That's crazy too.
So we're compounding craziness.
And the problem is the ACLU, not the NRA.
The NRA is being portrayed as the problem here, and these gun owners in Virginia.
No, the ACLU and the agents of political correctness are the problem.
Look at you can't fix a problem until you're honest about what the problem is, and nobody's being honest about what the problem is here.
Uh at at least uh at least not not out there on the um uh uh the drive-by media of the Democrat Party.
They're they got their political agenda fully revved up, and that's what they're focusing on.
This this guy, the shooter, was a known nut by professors, by students, by the law enforcement of that community.
People in his uh former schools and neighborhoods, they had to know it too.
Now don't misunderstand.
I'm not saying that this could have been prevented, but it is amazing that people come forward saying so many words they knew he was a nut, and it's just left there.
Just left there.
What?
Oh people say Tucker Carlson is a uh little note here from Kit uh H.R. Tucker Carlson's only at 3% in our poll, of which MSNBC anchor needs to resign to make room for a minority host.
The question is anybody know who he is.
Uh it's true that his program is uh airs at six o'clock, and I don't think they repeat it in prime.
That could that could be, but it it's too late to change it now.
He's on the list.
It's time.
The global warming update been saving a lot of stuff up here, folks, for the last four or five days.
That's our buddy uh Paul Shanklin is Al Gore and uh ball of fire.
All right, here we go with our global warming stack.
Headline Prius cannot pass Georgia emissions test.
I love this stuff.
Eco conscious drivers in Georgia are finding out that the grass isn't necessarily greener on their side of the fence.
2000 is the first year drivers of the 2004 Prius are required to get their cars tested for emissions.
Now you'd think that the Prius, the hybrid, would have no problems breezing through the exam, but as CNN reported, no matter how many times Georgia drivers try to test one, they all fail.
It's it's it's actually not that they fail.
It's more like the Prius refuses to take the test.
When the Prius is set to idle at 2500 RPM on the tester, it does what it's supposed to do.
It shuts off the engine to save fuel.
Uh Georgia's pre-hybrid equipment issues a failing grade because of an incomplete test.
So uh, you know, we got people like Lori David and Sheryl Crow and all these other people that uh, you know, they post their writings at the Huffing and Puffington Post, and they're out there trying to sell everybody on the virtue of the Prius that the Prius is so smart it can't even allow it, it won't even allow itself to be tested.
So it's failing emissions test.
Uh this a story from April 14th.
More than two dozen demonstrators braved cold, wet weather Saturday in Reno to attend a rally designed to draw attention to global warming.
The event was cut short by heavy rain and sleet, said organizer Lisa Stiller of the Northern Nevada Coalition for Climate Change.
It's kind of disappointing.
The weather kept people away, she said, but we still think climate change something people should talk about.
The uh the storm also some of the you can't make this up.
Listen to this.
The storm prevented the use of solar ovens for a potluck picnic.
Stiller said, and caused the planned two-hour demonstration to break up after one hour.
Cold wind and sleet cancels global warming rally and prevented the use of solar ovens for a potluck picnic.
Well, you know you're gonna have cold and rainy weather and you're gonna have sleet, and if your solar oven won't work in those conditions, you may starve.
Unless you have conventional cooking facilities.
Ins.
Hey, better news uh from across the pond.
Uh a group of British parents in New Forest, England are threatening legal action if soon to be Dr. Al Gore's schlackumentary and inconvenient truth is aired in their screws.
This was in Tuesday's Telegraph.
Parents who claim an award-winning film on climate change is inaccurate and politically motivated are threatening a legal challenge over the government's decision to send it to every secondary school.
UK government has sent this movie to every secondary school, demanding that the students see it.
The film by Al Gore, as you know, won an Oscar.
The education secretary, Alan Johnson, says he wants teachers to use it to stimulate children into discussing climate change and global that's BS.
They want them to watch this to become indoctrinated to it.
A group of parents in New Forest, though, say the circulation of the film by the government amounts to indoctrination, political indoctrination, and that it's in breach of the Education Act of 2002.
Derek Tripp.
Their spokesman has urged Alan Johnson to stop the film being sent out.
He said the film goes well beyond the consensus view and is not therefore a suitable material to present to children who need to be given clear and balanced, factually accurate information.
When the hell has that been going on in any public school system?
Fair, balanced, accurate information.
That's one of the problems.
New York City, according to AP, produces nearly one percent of America's greenhouse gas emissions.
That's an amount that puts it on par with Ireland or Portugal.
New York City polluting more than two countries.
The study released Tuesday was ordered by Mayor Bloomberg to assess the city's process in reducing its greenhouse gas emissions by 30% by 2030.
The study found that the buildings, the subways, buses, cars, and decomposition of waste in New York produced a net emission of 58.3 million metric tons of greenhouse gas in 2005.
The report said the city's emissions are currently as much as those of Ireland or Portugal.
They're not calculating here exhales of the citizens.
Which also is carbon dioxide.
From uh Reuters, scientists in the Netherlands have discovered a fungus in elephant dung that will help them break down fibers and wood into biofuel.
Bioethanol firms currently extract sugars from crops like grains and sugar beep.
Some of them are developing technologies to extract energy from fiber like wheat brands, straw or wood.
Scientists working at the Delft University of Technology and a firm called Bird Engineering have found a fungus in elephant dung that helped them produce a yeast which can efficiently ferment wood sugars.
We really see this as a technological breakthrough, said Mark Woolberg from Royal Nedalco, a Dutch alcohol maker.
Converting wood into ethanol will take more time, however.
Well, keep working out there on the elephant dung.
It's where the environmentalist wackos begin.
From the Cybercast News Service.com ahead of Earth Day on Sunday, that's why Earth Day Sunday, April 22nd.
Well, that's the date.
It is Sunday.
Yeah.
Advocacy group is warned that the U.S. is ignoring the most crucial factor in reducing global warming, and that's population control.
Human population growth is the paramount environmental issues, and Rick Oberlink, a spokesman for Californians for population stabilization.
Global warming, a very serious problem.
It's a subset of the overpopulation problem.
If we had half as many people, we wouldn't have much of a climatic warming problem.
Okay, so commit suicide.
You're telling us we got too many people?
Show us how to fix the problem, you people.
Back to the failed and uh stupid policies since have been disproved of Paul Ehrlich from the San Francisco Chronicle.
This new study warns of the health risks from ethanol.
It could end up creating a worse health hazard than gasoline.
LA would be hardest hit because ethanol creates more ozone than gasoline does, i.e., ethanol could end up polluting more than gasoline does.
Global warming could increase a climate phenomenon known as wind shear that inhibits Atlantic hurricanes, a positively good result of climate change, according to new research released yesterday.
The study to be published today in geophysical research letters found that climate model simulations show a robust increase in wind shear in the tropical Atlantic during the 21st century from global warming.
Now, the effect of global warming on wind shear similar to the impact of El Nino.
Now, what's interesting to me, these guys are supposedly highly reputed that issued the study, but it was just two years ago after Katrina that global warming was going to cause massive hurricanes, big ones larger than ever longer hurricane season.
and destroy everything out there because the sea surface temperature is rising.
Now, now these people are out there telling us a couple of them are that no, no, no, no, global warming gonna cause wind shear.
You rip the tops off those hurricanes they can't possibly form.
The point the point of all this, folks, all these stories, if you believe any of them, you are a nutcase, and you need to be expelled from wherever you are, because every day the stories get more ridiculous and they change.
There's no consistency to them, and yet they tell us there's a consensus of the scientists.
There's no such thing as a consensus.
These stories illustrate that.
Among many other things.
I'm long, got to take a break back after this.
I've been checking the emails here during the uh the break, and we're getting some questions on our poll at uh www.rushlimbaugh.com.
Again, the poll question, which MSNBC anchor should resign to make room for a minority host.
Chris Matthews, Tucker Carlson, Keith Olbermann.
Um question can you be an illegal alien and vote in our poll?
Yes, uh, ladies and gentlemen.
This is open to anybody.
This is on the free side of the website, so you can be a f you can be an illegal alien and vote.
Another question can you be an ex-felon and vote?
Yes, you can.
You can be a current felon and vote.
Uh, you know, the governor of Florida, a well-known Republican, is opening up to felons.
Mrs. Clinton wants the felon vote for the ex-felon vote for uh Democrats.
So, yes.
Um illegal alien, uh felon, ex-felons, all allowed uh to vote in our poll.
Uh and somebody said, Do you have a you gonna have paper ballots to back up or paper trail to back up?
No, we don't, folks.
Um there there will be no there's no paper backup.
This is all being done electronically by you, and our tabulation is being done electronically.
Uh so we we might, you know, we they might demand recounts uh on this.
Uh well, we'll be we're very confident of our system here, and so we'll demand recounts.
We'll be glad to engage them in that.
Uh James in Clearwater, Florida.
We've got about a minute and a half here, but I wanted to get to you.
Hello, sir.
Hello, Mr. Limbaugh.
How are you?
Fine, sir.
Thank you.
Uh appreciate taking the call.
I was just uh making comment on the IMES situation.
That it seems hypocritical from the media that they're bashing him, and you were unfortunately released from ESPN way back in uh early 2000s.
The crew from inside the NFL, HBO got on the bandwagon and bashed you for supposedly being racist when you were just making comment on Donovan McNabb's.
Make a comment on the media.
Not McNab.
I made a comment on the media, not McNabb.
Right.
You were you they mistrewed it as you making a comment on the Look at those guys are all let me tell you what the you know what the real problem here was.
The real problem was, and I've had a couple people who are big-time sports casters on the networks tell me this.
They were laying in wait for you, Rush.
They were just offended to no end that you were coming into their world, the world of sports.
And they were gonna get you somehow.
They were gonna try to get you no matter what, because they resented the fact that you were entering sports and you're not a sports guy, and you haven't paid your dues, and you're not a journalist and all that.
And you and what you said you saw happen on HBO's inside the NFL is a classic example.
Um HBO is a very liberal-oriented network anyway.
Um inside the NFL's got its share of liberal producers and so forth, liberal host.
Uh, who's obsessed with race, Bob Costas.
Uh, and then of course they've got that babe under Wanda Sykes, you know, who's this black comedian.
She can run around and say whatever she wants, like a rapper, and of course, no, because they just laugh at that, but she's she's protected because she is a minority.
And therefore, like all minorities, they can say what they want because they don't have the power to be racist or bigots or what have you.
All right, folks, I gotta leave.
I'm gonna go out and play golf at a couple of uh whacked out insane golf balls and make sure I expel them from my bag.
We will um we will see you tomorrow.
Have have a great Wednesday.
▲
Export Selection