All Episodes
Previous Next
April 16, 2007 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:26
April 16, 2007, Monday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
And greetings, welcome back, folks.
Great to have you.
Rush Limbaugh on fire on a roll.
I'm in charge of the thermostat here in the kitchen, and we're turning it up.
Great to have you with us.
As you know, I use half my brain.
The other half tied behind my back to make it fair.
And I do this with talent on loan from God, right here, from the distinguished and prestigious Limbaugh Institute for Advanced Conservative Studies.
And again, I promise you we're gonna get we're gonna get to your phone calls ill quick home.
Telephone number 800 282-2882.
The email address is rush at EIB net.com.
Now one other thing here that I that I want to I want to mention to you because I mean, look, you can't read an AP story on this IMAS whole situation without them alluding to the fact, and you've I'm sure you've seen it elsewhere.
Well, I mean, that uh what I must said is what I must say.
What about limbo?
There's no question that I'm in the crosshairs.
Everybody thinks I'm in the crosshairs next.
What they're wrong about, I've been in a crosshairs long before IMAS knew what it was like to be in the crosshairs.
By a Democrat funded arm of their machine, this Media Matters for America, tax exempt foundation, and what they do is they listen to these programs all of them, they put them up there, and that's where drive-by media types and the liberals hear, or rather, a better point, they read what what is said on this program within the context that the watchdog groups choose to present it.
And the the uh they never listen.
They do not listen to this program or any others.
They wouldn't deign to lower themselves.
So they rely on these watchdogs.
Mainstream media reporters do it, they all do.
Now, I'm I'm gonna say something.
I asked Mr. Sturdley here at the break if he thought that this would sound too self-serving.
He said, No, you gotta say it.
Um these people that are doing the watchdogging, these people that are, you know, running these websites as arms of the Democrat machine and are agenda-driven.
Uh all of the critics of this program, they wouldn't last a week behind this microphone with the scrutiny that I've had.
They wouldn't last a week with the scrutiny they give anybody else in conservative broadcast media.
They couldn't handle most of these people read cue cards on the morning shows or uh or of teleprompters or on the on the newscasts.
You put them behind a microphone with with no net, you put them there with no guests, you put them and you say 15 hours and you make it so people want to listen.
They couldn't do it, and the first moment they were criticized, they would go bonkers and baddie.
They couldn't handle it, folks.
They could not deal with the character assassination.
They couldn't deal with the out-of-context and lies, out-of-context reports and lies which are uh nothing more than attempts to destroy my credibility and others.
These are people who couldn't do what we do if their lives depended on it and succeed at it.
Another thing about talk radio, this is a spoken word medium.
It is not the printed word.
When you print what is sometimes said on talk radio, and you don't get the context, and you haven't listened, and all you're doing is reading it.
You can draw an entirely incorrect inf inference and clue conclusion from what has been said.
And this is understood by the watchdog groups who purposely structure what they print about what is said on this program in a way to influence the drive-by's and others who only.
You know, it let me give you the equivalent.
Let's say that um uh I decided to rely on somebody who literally hates the New York Times from my knowledge of what's in the New York Times.
Let's say I decided to stop reading it, and I assign somebody who I know who hates it to tell me every day what's in it, and then came on this program as an expert about what's in the New York Times.
That's what these watchdog groups are doing.
They're listening to it, they're characterizing it out of context, they're putting It in print, a spoken word format, and then the people who claim to be the experts in journalism in telling us what happened where we weren't there to see it.
They don't listen to the source.
They don't take the time to find out what was really said or hear the context.
They just believe everything that's written by it about it by people who have an agenda that is paid for by the Democrat Party.
I want to go to an audio sound bite, because this leads me to something.
We talked about this last week, but it's got the sound bite today.
Excuse me just a second.
It was on CNBC Joe Kernan, the anchor, was interviewing the activist, who's really just a Hollywood housewife, Lori David, the wife of Larry David, Seinfeld fame.
And she's up there promoting, you know, she got this bus tour she's going on out there with uh with Cheryl Crow.
And by the way, both of these women have written uh uh well, Lori David wrote an open letter to Rush Limbaugh on Ariana Huffing and Puffington's post out there, her blog, and Cheryl Crow also got in on the act at the Huffing and Puffington Post after Lori David got involved.
Open letter to me about how I don't understand anything, and they're thanking me for making their points about global warming and all this erratic, seemingly unseasonable, cool weather that we have had uh in in in these months that everybody associates with spring.
So Joe Kernan's talking to uh Lori David said, Look, this is something way out in the future.
It's gonna be expensive.
We're gonna have to deploy a lot of resources for this.
Does it really make sense to do it uh what when we got all these pressing problems that are so near term?
I don't know how you can say this is way out in the future.
We're seeing the impact impact right now, and uh they're all around us.
And you know, we just came through the warmest winter we've had, the worst wildfire season we ever had.
I mean, there are records being broken every single day.
Twenty-three hundred heat records broken last July alone.
How can you say the impacts in the future?
They're happening right this second.
That's why this is so urgent.
That's why we're out in the road talking to college students, and uh, you know, we have to start putting all this energy, all the time we have for interviews, into how are we going to solve this?
No, no, no, no, no, no.
How are we?
It's uh it's it's how's everybody else but you going to solve it.
Uh but like in her open letter to me on the Huffing and Puffington Post, uh, she illustrates here her her uh ignorance of the history of weather patterns.
And look it, she cites all these heat records last July.
We're breaking records in this country for cold and snow in April, but all that gets ignored.
Inf no, I'm sorry, it's not ignored.
In fact, all of this cold weather, this nor'easter up there that disrupted everything, lots of flooding up there, coastal Long Island of New Jersey, uh flights canceled, cold weather in Minnesota and so forth, that's cause of global warming.
That's what she said in her open letter to me on the Huffing and Puffington Post.
And she's she's out there going, you know, I made mention of the fact that Major League Baseball's having its early season games in some cities wiped out.
And she said, Oh, yeah, that thanks for making our point, Mr. Limbaugh, because that proves global warming, which is what I've always said, any weather calamity whatsoever, anything they think is there is no such thing as a weather calamity because everything that's happening now has happened before.
Uh weather's what it is, and there's nothing new in weather.
Cold fronts, record cold, record high.
You're always breaking records, Lori.
There's nothing new in it.
But all of a sudden, it's now attributable to just one thing, and that's global warming and so forth.
But um, anyway, we're getting to them out there because two open letters to me from uh Lori David and from what's her name?
Cheryl Crow on the Huffing and Puffington Post.
Quick timeout, we'll be back after this.
Stay with us.
I'm not gonna get into this now, but I'm gonna get into it before the program ends.
I have a story here.
And the story is by Jim Karris, a New York Times best-selling offer.
He's a weight loss expert.
Got a book called a cardio-free diet.
Says the absolute worst thing you can do to lose weight is aerobic exercise, walking on a treadmill on an elliptical machine, cardio will hurt you.
Cardio will not cause you to lose weight.
It kills everything except the appetite.
All it does, it kills the internal organs, it goes he goes into gym fix.
You want to do exercise that'll help you lose weight.
You've got to do weight training because that's the only thing that'll up your metabolism.
Meaning I instinctively know what I'm talking about, even when I am not the expert in the subject.
And I'll have details as the program unfolds today.
But here's Mark in Charleston, West Virginia.
Mark, welcome to the EIB network.
Yes, a pleasure to speak with you today.
I have three daughters who play in the local school system, play basketball in the school system.
When they play against public schools, they're constantly pummeled by insults of bitch and ho.
And they tell me that this is normal.
My point would be that the girls, excuse me.
You caught us uh totally by surprise.
There are people out there listening to this show trying to destroy it out there, and there you are, calling up and starting using the word.
Thank gosh, I bleep myself.
Well, well, Roger, I apologize, but this is common in the school system.
Yeah, you people but you people in media matters, it was Mark and Charleston, West Virginia said it.
I didn't say it.
I would never say the word.
But you said it, let them come after you.
That's right.
And it's it's common in our public school system.
It goes on on the public courts every day.
And I believe that the girls at New Jersey have probably been called this by their opponents before.
We don't know that.
Don't start speculating on this.
Okay, I won't speculate in the case.
Well, you might want to say that they they might have heard it in music.
They might watch MTV or something like that.
But I my my point would be if we want to solve this, start in the public schools, have some accountability there.
Well, that would, I mean, that that'd be a great place to start.
My one of my points early on in this uh is if you you take a look at IMUS or anybody else who has uh uttered these uh uncomplimentary terms.
What have they done to hold anybody back in the inner city school districts in this country?
What have they done to stunt their growth?
What have they done to poison their minds?
What have they done to hurt them in any way?
Zilch, zero not above it.
Who is the people that run the schools?
The drive-by media supports the teachers' union, the Democrat Party supports the teachers' union, and these inner city schools are doing genuine damage.
Look at the dropout rate.
They're doing genuine damage.
And if what you say is accurate about these words being tossed around at playground, and I don't doubt they are, they're all over popular culture.
They're all over music, they're all over books, they're all over well if they read uh these young kids in um some of these places, but they're certainly watching television, and it's all over the place out there.
Uh and the people that produce it, manufacture it, sell it under no scrutiny.
They're not coming under any any any problem whatsoever.
Uh but that's a good point.
Started on the uh on the school playground.
Uh but you see, it it boils down to something else.
In your example, two kids on the school ground calling each other these names, they don't have hate in their hearts.
No, it's only conservatives, they say, who have hate in their hearts and use these words to try to hurt people and try to harm them.
But there's no attempt to harm on the playground, which of course we all know, one of the most harmful places when the kids get going against each other.
Uh I did hear Snoop Dogg's reaction.
I quoted Snoop Dogg's reaction last week.
I told you what Snoop Dogg said?
I'll it's gonna be tough.
I can't say the words.
Snoop Dogg said, Don't lump us in with this image business.
When we in in the rap artist world, when we use those terms, we're talking about specific women and these are these lazy bum who only want to steal a n uh money and use the N-word.
They're just laying around trying to steal our money.
So he insults them again in the process of saying, don't compare me to Imus.
He sits and says that the black women in his hood are nothing but a bunch of what, sponges?
They're just sitting out there waiting to steal his money and that of his fellow rap artists.
Uh and that's the culture in which they grew up, and it's frustrating, and they're trying to alert the world to it.
But don't compare what we sing about to uh any of the stuff that these right-wing hate guys are saying on the radio and so forth.
Well, what's Snoop Dogg's real name?
Calvin um Calvin Calvin Brodus.
Calvin Brodus.
I saw uh I what did I what was the movie?
I watched a movie late last week, middle of last week.
And he was a character.
He was a wheelchair-bound ex con drug addict who was caught for selling cocaine again somewhere on the street in some dingy neighborhood of some dingy city.
And of course, the character was cool.
He got roughed up by the cops, but the character was cool.
I don't know.
I that that's that's that's the kind of thing I'm talking about here.
I I w I told you I watched the movie last night where the the black characters were not portrayed as, you know, the anything other than reprehensible.
And who who writes this?
We know liberals write this to who produces it, who films it, who directs it, who distributes it, and who's raking in the profits from it?
Bunch of white liberals.
Uh anyway, I appreciate the call out there.
Mark, uh, this is Lou in uh Massapequil in Long Island.
How are you doing today, Lou?
Hey Rush, I'm doing great.
Thank you, sir.
Listen, I I I think you're right on when you when you say that uh these groups always target the right.
They have they have one of their own in the midst who's been who's been talking about that H word forever, and I'm talking about the Walt Disney studios.
The Walt Disney studios who had a film.
Um, you mean you mean they're talking about the dwarfs out there and they go hi to dwarf right, yeah.
Seven dwarfs, and all they said with to this poor young woman was hi-ho, hi-ho- Damn.
I'm sorry, folks, I'm doing my best here.
They ignore hi-ho.
No, no.
Oh, gosh, what's gonna happen?
I should resign now.
It's all over for us.
You people are not helping me out there today.
I know what's scientist, I already addressed this.
Santa coming down the chimney.
Hee-hee hee-hee hee.
Merry Christmas.
Uh this is Benji in Houston.
Benji, nice to have you on the program.
Nice that you're there.
Megadiddo's rush.
Thank you, sir.
Thank you.
Uh, it is uh uh an extreme honor to talk to you.
I have been listening to you since uh the uh late 80s.
Well, you've been assist veritably here from the beginning, then I appreciate it.
Almost.
My best friend took me on to you, but the point I wanted to make is uh I I you you had a very good point uh about the liberals and believing that they're they're elitist and that they are better than everyone, but I don't think you took it far enough.
I believe that the liberals believe that they are above everyone because they deify themselves.
And I mean it it's it's obvious in the way they treat themselves.
You mean like they're the gods.
They're the they're they're the gods of judgment, the gods of they're the arbitrators, the arbiters.
Precisely.
And it it is evidenced in the the media, it is evidenced in the entertainment industry.
Uh it is I mean, what's the other thing?
Well, maybe that's why you may be right.
Maybe that's why liberals don't believe in God because they think they are.
Exactly.
Exactly.
That that was something that I had said to your your call screener at uh but it I mean it's a perfect example.
Anyone who is uh conservative actor, which I am, uh by the way.
Uh I'm not in the uh mainstream entertainment industry, but uh I'm working my way there at any rate, uh, is uh you have to hide that.
You uh i it's it's uh you can't call yourself conservative and make it in the in the entertainment industry.
Uh you know, Mel Gibson has been vilified for uh admittedly very stupid things that he's done.
Well that's not it look it I I know that's a universally held belief, but there are there are enough exceptions to it uh that uh it's I I think I think it's in the process of uh changing a little bit.
It's still oppressive, is exactly as you say it.
I know that you as a young unknown really have to keep your identity, your ideological identity close to the best.
You're absolutely right.
Uh about that.
So well, best of luck.
I appreciate the uh the loyalty that you have demonstrated and shown uh over all these years.
And as I said last Thursday, this is you know, people ask me all the time, but you know they're gunning for you.
Next.
They say, no, they've been gunning for me for I don't know how long.
But but but and they've they've you know they've fired some pretty pretty big shots, still here, and there's a reason for it, and and that is you.
I mean the connection, the bond of loyalty we have with this audience, and you listen every day, and there are twenty-two million of you.
You know what's said here and how it's said and what isn't said.
And so you are easily able to recognize when a bunch of BS is going down.
You're able to recognize the attacks that are taken out of context and so forth.
And uh that you don't get squeamish and they you don't say, Oh, gosh, I can't support this anymore.
I can't listen to this, because you know, because you listen every day that the uh the attacks on this program are not rooted in any fact or truth, but rather out of context innuendo on uh on any number of things.
And for that, I can never fully repay everybody the thank you that uh I I have is had will have to be sufficient, but that's one of the reasons why the real power of this program, aside from my brain is you.
ABC News is now saying 29 are dead at Virginia Tech, and the death toll is expected to rise.
A suspect is dead as well.
Um the uh uh you know one thing I saw when I had a chance to glance at the screen was is this the shooter was in there looking for his girlfriend, couldn't find her, just lining everybody up and opening fire.
Senseless.
At this point, nobody can make any sense of this.
It's just utterly shocking.
So we'll have to wait.
Find out what it was that was behind this.
Back to the audio sound bites.
Uh, Pat Schroeder on uh weekend today on Saturday, Lester Holt uh interviewed her.
And of course, the subject was Imus.
And Lester Holt said, where has the outrage been all these years?
Well, the outrage, it's been, I'll tell you what, we've really been tempered.
For many years there was uh Rush Limbaugh, you used to always call me a feminazi.
I never thought that was funny.
I thought that was horrible.
But you know, if you said anything about it, people said, Oh, those women they have no sense of humor, get over it, laugh it off.
You know, what's the laugh off about being called a Nazi?
I don't think it's fine.
Well, speaking of that, Miss Schroeder, I mean, how many of people on your side of the aisle call George W. Bush that every day?
You've got media figures out there doing a Siegheil salute on MSNBC.
And NBC doesn't find anything wrong with that, go do the Seag Hyle salute every night as an attempt to lampoon right wingers, and so forth.
Uh I don't know, did I ever name her?
Was she a feminazi?
Was she I I don't recall everybody.
When I came up at the term, there were 12 or 13 feminazes.
And all these women out there thought I was talking about all of them.
Uh and I I don't remember if she was in the original list.
She could well have been.
I do remember laughing at her over a number of things.
Like when she fell for the speech, the line I gave in the speech at Gopak.
You know, the Democrats is a 95 budget deal, a Democrats are out there saying that Republicans want people to starve, a kids to starve in school, and they're out there saying that it's getting so bad for senior citizens they got to choose now between dog food and medicine.
Yeah, and I went out there and I said at Gopak, I said, Well, you know, I just want to greet all of you fellow budget cutters here at GoPac.
I'm with you.
I just want you to know I'm sensitive to this.
And I went out and bought my mom a brand new can opener for the dog food she's gonna eat.
This is a classic, by the way, a classic illustration.
Somebody told her what I said without the context, and of course they don't have any sense of humor on the lip.
Nowhere do they laugh or smile.
None of them are happy about it and can't laugh.
So she goes to the floor of the House to representatives and tells this story as though I was dead serious about it.
But I guess the PS they songs, you know, she ran for the or thought about running for the Democratic presidential nomination at some point.
I early 90s.
What was it, 92?
It had to be 92 because it wasn't 96, and it wasn't 88.
No, wait.
It might have been 88.
Might have been 88.
Yes, it could very well have been 88.
Now, I've been following Pat Schroeder uh as a struggling and striving young talk show host of the future.
And I never saw anything about her husband.
She never talked about her husband.
Uh the media never talked about her husband.
I I knew it was Mrs. Pat Schroeder, but her husband was a non-factor.
And then one day she she went to the base of the Rockies to announce that she was not going to seek the presidential nomination of her party after all.
And there was this mystery guy standing next to her.
I'd never seen this guy before.
And when she announced that she was not going to seek the nomination, she started crying.
And she said she concluded she couldn't win.
And then the tears came.
I I just I can't win.
And then she fell into the arms of this guy and started crying on his shoulder, who I later learned was her husband Jim.
And this was the first time.
Yeah, feminazis didn't do that.
So I don't know that she was ever a an original feminazi.
But I I don't.
That's the first time I'd ever seen her husband, and what did she do?
This was, and in fact, I know this.
This might have been 84.
Because I was, no, I it well, but I remember talking about this in Sacramento, and I didn't leave there till 1988, in uh in July.
So I I don't remember when it was.
It's really not relevant.
It was in one of those spans.
But I I do remember that that video was all over televis, and f feminists were not happy because she had turned to the arms of a man in a time of suffering, distress, and discomfort, and she's crying and so forth.
This was setting the movement back.
Which of course just inspired me to play the video and the audio of it all the more.
Here's we got one more from uh from Pat Schroeder again with Lester Holt interviewing her on the weekend today show on NBC Saturday.
Holt says we keep having a conversation.
Are we changing, though, as a culture?
Part of it what we're seeing in Iraq.
We're seeing in Iraq the Shiites and the and the Sunnis fighting tremendously, and they began to realize a diverse democracy is a difficult thing to do.
They really can't allow people to stereotype and and attack other folks on public airways and do things like that.
Because that's the kind of of you breed all sorts of hatred and things that way.
It's just not a good thing to do.
And so I think maybe we're having a pullback from this meanness where we really thought meanness was cute and somehow it was masculine or something.
I don't know.
But let's hope there's a real pullback on that.
Did I hear I I know I heard that right because I followed it on the transcript.
And she's out there saying that something that's 1200 years old, the Shias and the Sunnis hating each other's guts is because of Imus.
And because of the coarseness of the culture in this country, public airwave?
What public airwaves in Iraq?
Uh part of it's we're seeing it in Iraq.
This they're stupid.
They're just pla This is a this is she wandering in vain here for a for any cogent thought.
He was speaking without knowing where she was going.
And I'm sure when she finished this, she thought that she had really hit the nail on the head.
It had really been brilliant.
All she's done here is illustrate her ignorance of the situation between the Shiites and the Sunnis.
They've hated each other long before we got over there.
They've hated each other for decades, centuries for crying out loud.
But now all of a sudden it's because the American culture is coarsened by people on the public airwaves.
I'm telling you, folks, this is about getting rid of people on the public airways that liberals don't want to listen to, and they don't want anybody else to hear as well.
Ron and Corpus Christi, Texas, I'm glad you waited, sir.
You're next on the EIB network.
Yes, hello, Rush.
Hello.
I just wanted to mention um uh David Brock, who is the president of Media Matters.
He put out a statement on uh last Wednesday on the 11th.
And part of the statement said more Americans are coming coming to understand the damage done by major news organizations providing a platform for bigoted commentary and other conservative misinformation.
And uh so he's hitting that I'm he's saying that IMUS is a conservative, so then the LA Times uh on the 13th, I'll just exactly right.
I was gonna remind you if you hadn't if you hadn't said it, the LA Times picked up exactly what they wrote at Media Matters about IMAS being a conservative, and the LA Times in an editorial called I'm a Conservative.
Now, what do you think that's it.
This here's a guy supports John Kerry, is opposed to the war.
His primary guests are all these liberal media elites, and all of a sudden, Imus had to turn out to be a conservative.
And he's not a conservative.
And the LA Times, who who's do the editors out, well, I don't know, I'm just probably not having LA station anymore.
But for crying out loud, if they're news people, they got to be more informed than that.
But no, no, no, no.
They're a little their little uh uh supply source, Media Matters for America, arm of the Democrat Party, George Soros funded, uh Taxi Foundation going out and calling Imus a conservative, and they may they just run with it.
Yes, what was your next point?
Well, I was gonna say that uh, okay, after the LA Times did their article, then Media Matters put up a response, and they tried to say that Imus was a conservative.
They were answering the LA Times trying to prove a point.
And the way they did the column was he's a conservative, therefore he's a bad guy.
He ought to be taken off the air just because he's a conservative.
But the points they were making were ludicrous.
He's not a conservative, everybody knows that.
Wait a minute.
Are you telling me that what happened was Media Matters first rights of Imus as a conservative?
The LA Times then picks that up and also calls him a conservative.
And then media.
Well, they called him a liberal.
And then so Media Matters put out a response saying, no, Imus is a conservative.
He's just a bad guy.
Well, okay, I missed one of the three steps.
Because I could have sworn the LA Times called him conservative after the after Media Matters did.
I know I read it.
I I don't have the article in front of me, but the Brock was disagreeing with with him being termed a liberal.
I read that article.
I read the other two.
I didn't, I don't have a printout of the other two.
I have a printout of Brock's original statement.
Well, whatever.
They had it, they had the they had to switch into high gear to do the CYA out there.
Uh but I think what Media Matters and Brock are going to do, like you said, they're going to use IMIS as a vehicle to try to take out other conservative uh uh media.
That's right.
There's no, there's no no no question about that.
The uh the um uh it's like Sharpton and Jackson are going after rap music.
That's to give them street cred when they come back after a while, because they don't want to cause a backlash.
I mean, it's gonna be a while before they zero in.
Well, I know he's got his list ready, Mr. Snerdley.
Sharpt has got his list ready, but they're they're gonna give it some time.
They don't want to they don't want to create a backlash.
Uh there they'll go after rap music uh that make a show of going after rap music to give them street cred.
And then the media matters time say, hey, what is this allegations that we're out here trying to target conservatives?
Look at IMAS, he was liberal.
We wouldn't, we don't care.
Yeah, we'll find all the other liberal hate speech on that website they chronicle.
You won't.
Thanks for the call out there, Ron.
We've got to be back after this.
Stay with us.
Hey, we're back.
Great to have you.
Rush Limbaugh, the excellence in broadcasting network at 800-282-2882.
See, here's the thing.
This is the way this is all shaping up out there.
You can't criticize people on the radio.
You can't do it.
You can't attack them, you can't defend yourself.
You can't defend others who are attacked by the demo.
Can't do this on radio.
You can do it on the floor of Congress.
You can go to the floor of Congress, the floor of the House, floor of the Senate.
You can say some of the most despicable things about people as Tom Harkin has about me or his fellow senators, or whatever.
You can do that all day long, and nobody, no, no can't.
We're not gonna stop that.
Congressional hearings, how how about how they try to destroy the character and the careers of judicial nominees at the Senate Judiciary?
You can do that all day long, and media matters won't care.
And the drive-by-in fact they'll love it.
They love it.
This is cool, and then these senators are written up as great heroes for daring to tell the truth about these despicable conservatives who want to take over the court and deny you women the right to choose or whatever other fear tactic they lie about.
TV news hit jobs, television news can do a hit job and destroy anybody they want.
The New York Times can do a hit job on it, destroy anybody they want.
But you can't do this on radio because they're gonna come after you do this on radio.
Conservatives do this in the alternative media.
Now, I'm gonna tell you what the objective is out there, folks, in case some of you are all entertained by this, understand that this is a Democrat Party drive-by media, Clinton image machine, uh Clinton machine agenda, and it is to suppress and kill conservative information.
Which it labels misinformation.
Conservative information, by definition, according to the template of the drive-by media and the media matters of the world is misinformation.
But they will say that their purpose is to eliminate conservative information.
Because it's misinformation.
Because there's a template, and the template is conservatives are racist, and as such, they have to be banned.
Of course, in the culture, we can't put up with this.
They've got to be banned from cable, they got to be banned from Fox News, got to be banned from radio.
Conservatives are also liars.
That's another template that the conservatives are liars.
They've got to be snuffed out.
And this is the purpose of the drive-by media, the Democrat Party and the Clintons, who are funding with their supporters all these watchdog efforts.
This is Stalinist, folks.
This is an attack on certain kinds of information that is protected by a template which says all conservative information is misinformation.
It is reported by liars and racists.
And that's the foundation under which they all proceed.
And they're all in on it.
And that is what is happening.
It's a general rule.
They would love to do this.
But we're gearing up for this election.
And if you don't think that in the drive-by media and the Democrat Party, if you don't think 2008 is all about the Clintons back in the White House, you've got another thing coming.
I'm going to tell you today.
I'm going to sit here and I'm going to tell you as we sit here today, There is an 80% chance that Hillary Clinton will be the next president of the United States.
If you look at the way things are falling out right now.
They're trying to take out Rudy Giuliani.
Guess what?
Rudy's a draft dodger now.
See the story over the weekend?
Rudy's June.
Well, you know, Clinton was a draft dodger, so they got Rudy.
Rudy's a draft dodger.
Whatever was said about Clinton, they're going after it.
Rudy's a draft dodger, Rudy's uh philander, whatever it is.
They're doing everything they can to take Rudy out.
Uh everybody says, well, what about Obama?
What about Obama?
Folks, if you are the, and I know there are stories out there how the Clintons are worried about Obama and not just on this fundraising stuff, but his godlike status to the godless and so forth.
If you're the Clinton machine, and your single competitor is somebody with less than two years' experience in these foxholes, do you really think they are worried about Barack Obama?
If you have fallen for the notion that the Clinton machine is sort of upside down and discombobulated and doesn't quite know what's going on here, you are falling for more myths from the media, which is designed to make it look like she has real competition so that she can overcome obstacles rather than being this candidate of inevitability, which she is.
So they're trying to make it look like she's got a serious challenge and she's up to it, and she can handle it.
But I'm telling you, I know the Clinton machine.
If you think they are seriously worried about somebody with as little experience as Obama has in these kinds of things, then you're you're falling, you're being sucked in for all this.
There is an 80% chance this woman's gonna be next president.
As things sit here today.
I mean, I know in politics, everything can change.
And it can change on a moment's notice.
But all of these attacks and all of this this budding attempt, and it's not new, it's just intensifying now, to discredit conservative information as misinformation reported by liars and racists, is about destroying the credibility of anybody who has anything in opposition to say to the Clintons.
And uh and their quest to be re-insconced in the White House.
That's what all this is about.
It's also about making sure that if Mrs. Clinton wins and so forth, that there won't be an alternative media.
Hello, fairness doctrine, hello, all of these things to just squelch it.
They don't want to hear it.
They want to go back to their monopoly days.
And that's that's what this is all about.
So when you keep talking about this in the context of IMAS, it's so much more about things having nothing to do with Imus than you would possibly believe.
In fact, don't get distracted when you think about this by putting it in the context of Imus.
Because it if it was about imus, it'd be over, wouldn't it?
And it is not, is it?
ABC now says 32 dead at Virginia Tech.
And there were two periods of shooting, and they kept classes open, apparently.
But it's a total confusion here as to uh what this is all about.
They'll be back and continue.
▲
Export Selection