All Episodes
Previous Next
March 29, 2007 - Rush Limbaugh Program
32:09
March 29, 2007, Thursday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
You know, I'm sitting there excuse me.
That's a William F. Buckley Jr. clearing of the throat.
I'm getting the William F. Buckley greatest conservative ever award tonight in Washington and some little tribute to Mr. Buckley.
Usually does this when the liberal is in the middle of an answer.
Anyway, I'm in there at Snerdley's office, and we're watching.
He always has MSNBC on, and I don't know why, but he always does.
And I'm watching uh I forget who the infobe was doesn't matter who the infobabe was.
By the way, welcome back.
It's uh Rush Limbaugh, the all-knowing, all caring, all sensing, all feeling maha Rushi uh here at the Limbaugh Institute, 800-282-2882, watching this back there, and they're talking about Rove.
And there's there's a B-roll of Karl Rove being uh frog marched out of some building or something.
And there's Michael Isakoff, Michael Isakoff, the guy who lied from Newsweek, lied about a Koran being flushed down at Toilet Club Gitmo that launched who knows how many attacks and riots and deaths in Afghanistan and number places.
And here's here's Michael Isakoff, still with total credibility, pontificating on what Rove did, and we've got to get Rove, and they had this report from this canned U.S. attorney Iglesias, and he put up this graphic of an email to Carl Rowe from Dennis D. Consini.
He said, Look, it uh guy's not doing his job here.
I got I got a perfect guy for you.
Thanks, Carl, for considering it and so forth.
Well, who else you're gonna call if you're if you know, senators do recommend uh judge appointees, the White House hires U.S. attorneys if you got to be Pete Domenici, is that what I what did I say?
Uh, Domenici Deacon City, what that's the difference.
Um, I know Deacon Sini's a demon.
It's Pete Demenici.
So he sends an email to Rove, thanks, Carl.
Then they go out and get well who else you're gonna call if you want if you want uh if you want the president's a guy that hires and fires these people.
So they get a little graphic up there from uh from David Iglesias, what's Rove?
Well, what's what's what's what's Dominic thanking Rove for?
Well, it's a common way you end an email, Mr. Iglesias.
I don't know about you, I send people emails, I thank them.
Whether I'm asking them for something or not.
Man, oh man, this is you know, folks, I was telling you, this guy that called right before the uh last hour ended, who want to know why it's uh why do we have to play by the rules and the other clowns out there don't.
How come the Iranians get away with violating the Geneva Conventions and we are slayed when we don't violate them for violating them?
And I want to expand on this.
You folks have got to understand something.
This is a combination of two forces having come together, actually, one entity, political correctness, and liberalism.
And you have to understand liberalism, it has many facets to it, but one of the facets is that the majority is by definition unfair, because it's larger than the minority.
So the minority has no power.
The small groups have zero power, therefore they are incapable of being any ists.
They're not bigots, they're not racists, they are not sexists because they don't have the power to implement any of their bigotry.
Well, if you on the other hand, it's not supposed to be fair for the majority because they're already in a power position that's unfair relative to everybody else.
Now, at the root of this is the fact that liberals live their lives trying to accomplish one thing, and that is that they never discriminate against people.
That is why they look at my humor.
I've heard I've seen liberals say, well, yeah, Limbaugh is funny, but the problem with Limbaugh's humor is that it's always at the price of some minority.
Or it's always uh uh it's always aimed at people who have no power.
Uh and and of course, this this is uh subtext for it, you're just not allowed to discriminate, and they will not allow themselves to discriminate.
Or you might say, well, they discriminate against Bush all the time.
Well, in let's say contest between Bush and the Iranians.
You you you have to discriminate against Bush.
Because Bush has all the arsenal, he has the power, he has this robust economy behind him.
It's okay to discriminate against the majority, particularly when you're not in it.
Uh and so these poor little insurgents uh in Iraq, why they're just these little nomads, and they're up against this massive superpower, and they're just doing what they can to get noticed.
Uh When I first came across this early on in my busy broadcast career, I went out to Los Angeles.
I was doing an appearance out there at our 50,000 watt flamethrower, KFI.
And there had been some some uh some gay pro Oh, it was it was when uh Act Up stormed into St. Patrick's Cathedral started throwing condoms during the mass of John Cardinal O'Connor.
And I just flipped a wig on this and raised holy hell about it, and I said, you know, maybe you people instead of throwing condoms in there, maybe you need to seek some counsel in there.
Uh, because this is clearly, and and some reporter at Los Angeles, I forget what paper didn't matter, wanted to talk to me about it.
And I said, this is this is this is this outrageous is setting back the movement.
This but they have to do something to get notice, Mr. Limbaugh, and nobody's paying attention to their cause.
They have to do anything they can to get no.
And so light went off in my head.
Oh, they're entitled.
They're entitled to all this disobedience.
They're entitled to go up to the edge of the law and maybe cross the line and break the law because they're a minority, and they're being discriminated against simply because they're in the minority.
It's you have to understand even minority members are automatically the victims of discrimination by virtue of being a minority.
Their characteristics, their character, their behavior is irrelevant.
They can be reprobates, and they're entitled to be because they are in the minority.
So when you ask me, what is it that has the Iranians able to get away with violating all these codes of conduct and we're held to even higher standards than what the code of conduct's conduct requires, it's because things aren't supposed to be fair for the United States.
You have to understand that as far as the politically correct and the left are concerned, the United States is guilty by virtue of its existence.
It takes too much of the world's resources.
It pollutes too much of the planet, it is single-handedly destroying the planet with global warming.
Uh the United States has way too much wealth.
Uh the United States is unkind and unfair to the disadvantaged.
And so these poor little Iranians, they've only got one gasoline refinery.
I mean, what these people, you know, they're backwards.
They live in the seventh century, and most of them don't even have air conditioning.
They live in these mud huts and whatever it was that still survive from the seventh and eighth centuries and so forth.
What do you expect?
I mean, the here are the Brits, 15 Brit soldiers, this omnivorous, all-powerful, deadly force-threatening Brit contingent of 15 threatens the sovereignty of this poor little nation, Iran.
Why the Iranians have every right to defend and protect themselves.
We're not uh you start demanding fairness out there.
Understand this.
It's not to be extended to Americans, and particularly in this climate, conservative or Republican Americans.
Because we're by virtue of our power and our majority status, we are guilty.
And therefore, any act against us is permitted.
But any act of retaliation by us is excessive, unnecessary.
That's why we got to close Club Gitmo.
Why these are just poor little nomads?
What do we think we're doing?
Acting like we run the planet, acting like we run the universe.
Who in hell do we think we are?
Uh and so this kind of thing works against, you know, you have you have a politically correct society typified by the British society these days.
Uh they're not going to do anything.
They may have a they may they may put some ships out there, but the the UK does not have the Navy it used to have.
The British Empire is no more.
Now I will say this.
I don't think the mullahs of Iran would have done this had it been 15 Americans close to or in Iranian waters.
I don't think they would have dared dared done this uh to the United States, but something like the UK, they'll do it, and they'll and because they know nobody's gonna do anything about it.
Because everybody that wants to do or would do something about it's hands are tied.
We're supposed to sit around and let our forces be captured like this.
And we're supposed to sit around and let them be beheaded, and we're supposed to sit them around and let them be paraded on television uh in violation of the Geneva Convention.
We are we deserve this.
We deserve to find out what it's like to feel like we have been making the rest of the world's poor and minorities feel all of our existence.
That's the point of multiculturalism and the trashing of the original founders and settlers of this country.
I mean, it's it it's part and parcel.
So, you know, if you want to call a you know a mass rally and demand fairness for the for the United States of America, understand this, you are going to be laughed at by liberals and the drive-by media in this country throughout.
All right, uh Fidel Castro has hit out at U.S. biofuel use.
He's written an op-ed.
Castro signed an op-ed.
People are speculating, hey, hey, hey, hey, his health is coming back.
And in this op-ed, it was in their their state party newspaper down there, Grandma.
Uh Castro strongly criticized the use of biofuels by the United States.
In his first article since undergoing surgery last year, he said that the president's support for the use of food crops and fuel production would cause three billion deaths from hunger.
The article didn't mention uh Castro's health.
Some people uh think that Castro may have a point here.
Uh basically talking ethanol and sugar.
Uh sugar is a big export crop.
Well, as big as the Cubans have anything, but uh it's an excort export crop and bigger than tobacco for them down there.
Uh and of course, he's talking about ethanol, and he's referring to the rising price of corn around the world.
Well, I've predicted uh, you know, Castro, I I hate to say this in a way, but he's just echoing sediments that uh I have offered on this program previously, although I've never put the death toll in any specific number.
Uh but this is going to give the leftists pause because they love Castro.
He's addicted to see this this it fits them all perfectly.
Why do they love Castro?
He's just some poor little guy down there trying to do the best for his disparaged people.
His people are walking around a ho i i in virtual poverty.
His people, they may have so-called great health care, but look at I mean the infrastructure of Havana is falling apart.
The great art deco, the buildings, they're literally crumbling.
There hasn't been any infrastructure rebuilding, remodeling, uh reinforcement, nothing.
Leftists will not say, well, that's because they got a socialist country down there, and all the money goes to Castro and the government.
And they keep it rather than spend it on the country and again the people who live there.
Uh they'll never conclude that.
They'll just look at these people, and they'll end up thinking it's United States Folkazar embargo.
And then they'll say, poor little Castro.
I mean, he's he's just he's such a brilliant man.
He has stood up to the evil beast.
He has stood up to the devil itself, the United States of America, and he doesn't take any grief.
He's admired for this.
Castro's entitled to do whatever he wants, say whatever he now he's come along, and uh he's taken an issue here with one of the big movements of the American environmental left, and that is biofuels.
Uh but don't expect Castro to be criticized by any of the people who would normally criticize someone who says that U.S. biofuel use will kill three billion people.
Because he's entitled.
He's entitled to make a mistake.
He's so frustrated.
He's just so frustrated.
He's been trying to make his island nation a paradise, and here in the way is near the evil United States from Lyndon Johnson on, and it's just horrible.
And and these these wacko, these insane Cuban exiles in Miami, those evil people, those people that remember the majority.
They're the ones that are making it tough for Castro.
They're the ones that are making it tough for us to normalize relations and be able to send welfare down there.
That's how they look at this.
Learn it, love it, live it.
Be right back.
You know, Republicans have feuds as far as the drive-by media is concerned.
My little argument with Arnold Schwarzenegger last week was a feud.
The Democrats just have uh disputes, little disputes.
And if last night on CNN, the uh the situation room with Wolf Blitzer, Barack Obama was asked about the little dispute that he has going with the Reverend Sharpton.
Now, this is hardly little.
You know, the Reverend Sharpton, very much upset uh that Barack Obama is being called the first articulate and clean black man to seek the presidency.
Sharpton's done that before, and he's taken showers before campaigning and so forth.
He does very offended by this.
And he thinks that Obama's not down for the struggle.
Obama doesn't have any roots to the uh civil rights struggle in this country.
He's an interloper, if you will.
Sharpton's got these credentials, and the Reverend Jackson has these credentials.
And by the way, the Reverend Jackson has come out and said he's going to vote for Obama.
Sharpton, even more and more isolated, very upset.
We've we've played these bites for you of Sharpton standing outside uh Obama headquarters with the megaphone, the bullhorn, demanding Obama come out and talk about it for justice.
Uh shouting fat jokes about Obama's mother to Obama.
So Obama asked about this last night, and uh Wolf said, have you and Al Sharpton made up?
You gotten over that little dispute you had.
You know, I uh I don't think there was uh uh much going on there.
Uh the uh Reverend uh Sharpton has been a terrific advocate on behalf of the dispossessed.
Uh I've always expressed uh my respect for him.
Uh I think this was a misunderstanding as a consequence of uh uh his reading of uh uh report in New York.
Uh and uh yeah, I called him and said we had nothing to do with uh the article.
Well, I don't know.
That may be true, folks, but I'm not sure that the Reverend Sharpton has bought into all this, as you know.
We've made this in his song.
All those years of sacrifice.
The Reverend Sharpton needs justice.
And he won't get it if Obama continues to rise.
Our buddy Paul Shanklin there with the Sharpton impersonation.
Timeout for a break here at the bottom of the hour.
Your phone call's coming right up.
A man, a living legend, a way of life, the most dangerous man in America, because I am right.
All right, I'm gonna take this next call because I'm being inundated with similar requests in the email account at Rush Limbaugh.com.
It's uh Michael in Delta, Colorado.
Welcome, sir, to the EIB network.
Hey, it's a real pleasure to talk to you.
It's been a while, uh first time I ever got on.
Uh I thought I'd make it uh real simple for you with all the crazy stuff going on in the world.
I'd like to know how you cured your golf swing.
Yeah.
You know, I'm I I'll be glad to answer the question.
I wasn't going to sing about it because everybody's golf swing different, and I, you know, th I'm I'm certainly not a teacher.
So, but I here's here's the sum total of it.
I was standing too far from the ball, and my posture was way too bent over because I'd been advised to do this.
Uh and as such, I was taking the club way too far behind me, not up, and blocking everything right.
Uh, and it it was so bad that I wasn't even swinging with my arms.
When I came down when it came on the downswing, it was just my lower body turning and the arms weren't even moving, and they course trailed my hands were trailing the ball by uh I mean if I had if I'd have been able to play in the ATT or the hope I'm not killer here, Michael.
Kidding you, if I had been able to play, I would have killed spectators.
Because I was hitting shots two feet off the ground, 45 degree angle from where I was aimed.
So been there and done that, sir.
Yeah, but I c but but then they said, okay, here's what you're doing wrong.
Now, it's bad enough when you can't fix a swing when you don't know what you're doing wrong.
When you do know and can't fix it, then I couldn't.
I still couldn't find a way to swing my arms.
So find this past Sunday.
I went out for six hours, and a guy, the pro said, Well, let's try it your way.
And he was very smart because he let me prove for three hours my way wouldn't work.
So now try it my way.
He has me standing two feet closer to the ball and standing what to me feels like straight up.
Straight up with the butt out like I'm sitting on a high stool.
Oh my goodness.
And the swing is all down target line, not around me, and it's very high.
I uh I'm I've gone out and if I've played every day since that I could get out there, and uh and and uh yesterday I hit a 275-yard three wood into into a par five and two.
Well, that was gonna be my next question.
How far are you driving the ball?
Obviously uh I'm driving the ball while driving the ball when I'm but but but you wouldn't understand.
I don't want to get a whole lot of detail about this.
I have not used my three wood since November because I have been able to hit it.
That's my favorite club.
Well, it used to be mine, but uh now it's just it's it's everything is and it's effortless.
It's uh the and finally this taught me how to hit down on the ball rather than pick it.
You know, this is stuff that people play the game regularly know.
I just nobody ever told me this way to do it.
All these other newfangled ways are out there.
So what'll happen?
You know, I'm a rank amateur, and in time I'll screw this up.
And and uh think, ah, I gotta go back to my old way.
But I don't actually don't see that happening, because this is it just makes total sense.
My confidence level standing over the ball has never been higher.
After just well, this is Thursday after just four days since Sunday.
True, right?
Well, it sounds like you're enjoying the game again.
Hey, listen, uh, just one quick uh uh comment and I'll get off.
Um it was about three or four days ago they were talking about the polar bear thing, and and I tried to get in and I couldn't.
My my thing was uh sometimes Mother Nature, you know you gotta eat things.
I just wish the liberalists would start doing the same thing.
Uh thanks for taking my call.
I enjoy your program and uh have a lot of people.
Wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait.
Well, when you say sometimes you just got to eat things, what what do you mean?
Well, Mother Nature, Mother Nature sometimes, like the Mother Polar Bear, she decided that uh for some reason or another that uh she didn't want the club.
Okay, you know what?
Well, no, no, no, no, you're talking about two different things.
I was referring to this brilliant and really good show called Planet Earth that's on the Discovery Channel.
Is it eleven, it's eleven part series, and they've aired the first three.
The next two come up Sunday night, eight o'clock and nine o'clock Eastern time.
That is a scene in high definition, it's incomparable.
Uh and in the case of grizzly bears and polar bears, th normally one cub is the litter.
There's just one cub is born.
But if there are two born, the mother has to choose one.
She can't feed both of them.
One dies.
Man has nothing to do with it.
It's the way God made it.
Male grizzly bears, and I think this is true with male polar bears, the mother has to keep the cubs away from the male, the male will eat them.
They didn't say why, they just said that it uh that it happens.
So, you know, there's uh you can't you cannot watch this series and come away with the conclusion that we have anything to say about how nature operates, and we can't interrupt it, and we can't it's just it's it's uh you sit there and you watch this and you say, Oh, we're gonna put incandescent uh fluorescent light or fluorescent compact bulbs in all of our sockets that's gonna save this.
Becomes ridiculous.
But let me ask Mike will just make a point here to you about eating animals.
Um uh i is there any animal that the human being eats that's on the endangered species list?
Not to my knowledge.
Well, of course there isn't, and why not?
Well, it probably wouldn't taste good.
No, but no, no, we need them for food.
So if an animal's about to become extinct, we should start eating it.
And then capitalism will see to it that there are farms of these animals produced.
We don't have a shortage of chicken.
Chicken's not endangered, the steer isn't inject it isn't endangered, cattle's not endangered, fish aren't endangered.
Uh veal not in foie gras is, but not the goose.
Uh everything we eat is plentiful.
It's the the endangered species, the ones that we're not allowed to interact with or eat or uh involve ourselves with in any way.
Well, I say that the animal people just go nuts.
You know, flat out straight logic.
Something they can't deal with.
Chris in Larksburg, California.
Thank you for waiting.
You're up next.
Greetings, Rush.
Thank you, sir.
Uh thanks for taking my call.
I'm uh a lone gorilla conservative here in Larksburg, California.
Um you alluded to this twice already in the program.
What's your take on the politics behind incredibly shrinking British Navy?
Uh apparently the Canadians have already done this.
And are we next to the thing?
Canadians have I'm I'm having trouble hearing you, so I'm waiting for the transcriber to have done this.
Canadians have gotten rid of their Navy, the British have gotten rid of theirs, and are we next?
Correct.
Um think we'll ever get rid of the Navy.
The defense industry in this country is too profitable for both parties.
Uh this might be, in fact, a good time to get to the Diane Feinstein story.
Let me dig it out here from my stack of stuff.
Yes, here we go.
Uh a lot of people think the libs will downsize the military.
They will not downsize oh, they'll downsize it and and they'll let it fall into disarray, but they will always use the military as a as an objective for pork or graft.
I mean, the the defense contractors contribute to both parties, and uh and libs Democrats will make sure that there are enough military contracts to spread the federal wealth around.
Now, where they will harm the military is by letting it go into dilapidation or screw it up by pretending it's a social playground and start doing a bunch of experimentation, like women in combat gays in the military, or they'll just, you know, not not upgrading so but they won't use it.
Uh is not fair.
It's not fair that we should have a military.
Here's the Diane Feinstein story, and this is from a uh a website that is in suburban San Francisco, and it's been picked up by well, it it actually has not been picked up by the drive-by media yet, which is fascinating in and of itself.
Peter Byrne writes the story.
Uh, let's see, what's uh the website didn't print out here in the print only box.
Anyway, Senator Diane Feinstein has resigned from the military construction appropriations subcommittee.
It's called MILCON.
As previously and extensively reviewed in these pages, Feinstein Feinstein was chairperson and ranking member of MILCON for six years, during which time she had a conflict of interest due to her husband Richard Blum's ownership of two major defense contractors who were awarded billions of dollars for military construction projects approved by her.
As Milcon leader Feinstein relished the details of military construction, even micromanaging one project at the level of its sewer design.
She regularly took junkets to military bases around the world to inspect construction projects, some of which were contracted to her husband's companies, Perini Corp and the URS Corp.
Perhaps she resigned from Milcon because she couldn't take the heat generated by this newspaper's expose of her ethics, or was her work on the subcommittee finished because Blum divested ownership of his military construction and advanced weapon manufacturing firms in late 2005.
Now, the military construction appropriations subcommittee is not only in charge of supervising military construction, it also oversees quality of life issues for veterans, which includes building housing for military families and operating hospitals and clinics for wounded soldiers.
Perhaps Feinstein is trying to dissociate herself from the military construction appropriation subcommittee incredible failure to provide decent medical care for wounded soldiers.
Two years ago, before the Washington Post became belatedly involved, the online magazine Salon.com exposed the horrors of deficient medical care for Iraq war veterans.
While leading the military construction appropriation subcommittee, Diane Feinstein had ample warning of the medical care meltdown, but she was not proactive on veterans' affairs.
Feinstein abandoned MilCon as her ethical problems were surfacing in the media, and as it was becoming clear that her subcommittee left grievously wounded veterans to rot while her family was profiting from the occupations of Iraq and Afghanistan.
Now Ed Morris at Captain's Quarters also references this uh story today.
And uh is his take on this right on the money.
The new Congress been barely made it past its start before a new face has been put on lobbyist influence.
Diane Feinstein, senior senator from California, has resigned her leadership position on a subcommittee which put billions of dollars into her family business.
This is culture of corruption Democrat style.
Now, wasn't it the Democrats who insisted that the Republicans jumped into bed with lobbyists and special interests?
So now we have a senior Democrat who made sure that over a billion dollars of federal money got rooted through her own checkbook with her husband as proxy.
When can we expect to see a Democrat investigation into this brand of corruption?
Hint, we won't, folks.
During the 2006 election, Feinstein's party made a lot of hay out of non-competitive contracting by the government.
Democrats railed about Halliburton, even though Halliburton won 95% of its contract dollars by full and open competition.
Now we see that Feinstein herself had no problem with noncompetitive practices as long as it meant stuffing her own pockets with taxpayer money.
Take a look at the percentages in the above, and I'll go through those here in just a second.
In 2005, uh C.B. Richard Ellis, one of the companies, made 100 million dollars in federal contracts, only half of which had been part of full and open competitive building.
As of December 2006, according to SEC filings and WW.fedspending.org, three corporations in which Feinstein's husband's financial entities own a total of one billion in dollars in stock, won considerable favor from the budgets of the Department of Defense and the Department of Veterans Affairs.
Here are the three.
Boston Scientific Corporation, 17.8 million for medical equipment and supplies, 85% of contracts awarded without benefit of competition.
Kinetic Concepts Incorporated, 12 million dollars, medical equipment and supplies, 28% non-competitively awarded.
And C.B. Richard Ellis, the Blum-controlled international real estate firm holds congressionally funded contracts to lease office space to the Department of Veterans Affairs.
It's also involved in redeveloping military bases turned over to the private sector.
Culture of corruption Democrat style.
So the bottom line here to the question: the Democrats are not going to shut down the Navy.
Look at Mertha.
Mertha has enriched himself and who who knows how many people in his own district via the Department of Defense budget and uh and various projects and so forth.
So the military exists for that purpose as far as the Democrats are concerned.
As far as Feinstein's concerned, she's resigned MilCon uh for whatever reason, but you won't hear much about this.
There's a there's a clear double standard.
And the Democrats are simply incapable of corruption, folks.
They're simply incapable of it.
If anybody got on this path in an elected official, you would see the Democrat Party set out to destroy that person like the Clinton Inc.
bunch tried to destroy Ken Starr.
We'll be right back.
I want to tell you people about a man named Pat Dollard.
Pat Dollard was uh top Hollywood agent.
He was a top Hollywood producer.
And as such, he was a major liberal.
He's done a 180 on this.
He's now doing a documentary.
He's preparing a documentary on the war in Iraq.
He went to Iraq on his own with a camera.
He got 700 hours of Marines on film being heroes, ripping the media for defeatism, and about being killed.
He's currently talking with HBO, trying to turn his documentary into a mini-series.
One of the producers of Top Gun, or the one of the directors, I guess, a guy named Tony Scott is working to turn the life of Pat Dollard into a movie.
Vanity Fair, which I do not read, uh did a hit piece on Pat Dollard to, of course, discredit him.
Uh talked about his dark, typical Hollywood past, sex, drugs, rock and roll, and all that.
But the real story is that he walked away from a 750,000 a year job to make young Americans, which is the title of his documentary, about why this war is the right war at the right time with the right enemy.
He's an Oscar-winning director.
Uh Steve, well, he was Steve Soderbergh's agent.
He was it he wasn't the director.
Steve Soderberg was the Oscar-winning director.
Uh did Ocean's 11 and 12 sex lies video tape, Aaron Brokovich, and Pat Dollard was uh was his agent.
His transformation to the right from the left uh happened in 1996.
His his uh deceased sister dated Bobby Kennedy Jr., by the way.
And they all think on the left that he's nuts because he's pro-war and pro-conservative.
Uh the hit piece in Vanity Fair on Pat Dollard was 23,000 words.
It was uh it was their Hollywood edition, and it was called Pat Dollard's War on America.
It was the largest such piece in Vanity Fair's pistr uh history, 23,000 words.
And I uh have been directed to his uh website, where he describes a little bit about his young Americans documentary.
I wish the projection I'm writing about was astral.
I wish the people I'm writing about were permanently floating out of their bodies, or at least until they came to their senses.
Nancy Pelosi, Ram Emanuel, Harry Reid, and well the rest of the Democrat Party have decided to project their policy and political ambitions with regard to the war in Iraq onto you and me.
People who were not offered the opportunity to vote on any proposed national law or referendum regarding Iraq, but who instead were only offered the opportunity to vote in local elections for representatives to the federal government.
And he's referring here.
And the Democrats always do this.
▲
Export Selection