All Episodes
Previous Next
March 13, 2007 - Rush Limbaugh Program
32:28
March 13, 2007, Tuesday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
And welcome back, folks.
Nice to have you with us.
This, the award-winning thrill-packed, ever-exciting, increasingly popular, growing by leaps and bounds, Rush Limbaugh program on the Excellence in Broadcasting Network.
I am your highly trained broadcast specialist, Rush Limbaugh, executing assigned host duties flawlessly and in the process, meeting and surpassing all audience expectations on a daily basis.
Here's telephone number.
800-282-2882, the email address rush at EIBNet.com.
So Dick Durbin, the audio soundbite we played just before the conclusion the previous hour, admits to killing a mouse or a rat in his apartment with a putter.
And ABC is giving him all kinds of puff piece treatment here.
This is a television report after a big puff piece, I think, from the Washington Post style section.
It might have been the New York Times.
But I saw that story some weeks ago, and I could just tell you there would never be one of those stories about Republicans.
And if there was a story about four Republican guys living together, I guarantee you, the story would have gay overtones.
But, of course, no such thing with the libs.
Now, here's the story about the poor old guy from New York.
This is a 1994 story from August, the New York Times.
With an estimated three rats for every person in New York City, you might think that when Frank Ballon fatally clobbered one with a broomstick, he'd be hailed as having struck a blow for hygiene.
But at the time he was 69 years old, a World War II vet, he caught the rat raiding his tomato patch in the suburb of Hillside, New Jersey, was charged with needlessly abusing a defenseless creature, told that he could be sent to prison for six months and fined up to $1,250.
Public outrage ensued, many people pointing out that killing rats is a matter of necessity, given their huge numbers in some metropolitan areas.
Anyway, the charges were dropped, and Mr. Ballin has since passed away.
But people for the ethical treatment of animals on the case back, along with the local law enforcement authorities, time for another update.
We're update loaded here today, ladies and gentlemen.
Trumpet fanfare.
The Brick Girl's in the news, which is good as I love this update.
The Brick Girl John Edwards, potentially the first female president of the United States, it's Paul Shanklin with the exciting vocal portrayal there.
I am woman.
What is the Brick Girl news today?
Well, it's from our old buddy Nedra Pickler at the Associated Press.
Democrat presidential candidate, the Brick Girl, was skeptical.
Wait till you hear this.
The Brick girl was skeptical about voting for the Iraq war resolution and was pushed into it by advisors, looking out for his political future, according to an upcoming book by one of his consultants.
And guess who it was that forced the Brick girl to vote for the Iraq war?
None other than Democrat strategerist Bob Shrum.
Shrum writes in his memoir to be published in June that he regrets advising Edwards to give Bush the authority to go to war in Iraq.
He said if the Brick girl had followed his own instincts instead of the advice of political professionals, he would have been a stronger presidential candidate in 2004.
Now, the Brick girl's spokesman, David Ginsburg, disputes the suggestion that Edwards was making a political calculation with the vote that he has called the most important of his career.
Spokesman says, the Brick girl cast his vote based on the advice of national security advisors and the intelligence he was given, not political advisors.
Now, what's Shrum trying to do here?
Shrum's trying to get the Brick girl off the hook, and the Brick girl doesn't like the method being used to get him off the hook because it's making him look like he was a prisoner and a slave to political consultants.
So the Brick girl is now trying to turn it around.
No, no, no, no, I believe Bush.
Bush lied, and people died.
And Bob Schrum had nothing to do with Shrum, obviously, has burned his bridges now and perhaps getting the Edwards campaign, which is too bad because Edwards, well, Shrum has not been exactly successful in presidential campaigns.
He ran the campaign of John Kerry, who served in Vietnam.
But one thing the Brett girl has going for him on this is he can always change his mind.
Women can change their minds like that.
It's expected and it is applauded.
And as such, if the Brett girl later wants to say, you know what, I have thought about this, and Bob Schrum is rot.
He is to blame for my voting for the Iraq.
But regardless, blame it on somebody else.
The Brick girl is out there taking, trying to get all the credit for admitting that he made a mistake.
But when it comes time to saying he did it based on his own thoughts, uh-uh, it's got to be somebody else's fault.
All right, this is a pretty important global warming update coming up.
Involves Al Gore in that stupid movie.
Al Gore and Ball of Fire takeoff on Johnny Cash Ring of Fire, and again, portrayed vocally by Paul Shanklin.
All right, I got to tell you a story first.
I just heard this mere moments ago at the break at the top of the hour.
A friend of mine told me that a friend of hers, who is a stalwart conservative, very, very responsible citizen, straight arrow.
I mean, just clean and pure as the wind-driven snow type woman, a mother of a what-age child are we discussing here?
An 11-year-old child.
This woman that we're talking about knows me and is very familiar with the program and is an ardent listener and is solid conservative.
Yesterday, or sometime recently, the 11-year-old was forced to watch an inconvenient truth, the Al Gore propaganda movie.
Well, no, Biggie, we've heard this happening throughout the country.
What makes this story unique was that the 11-year-old's parents were required by the public school system here in Palm Beach County to also go to school and watch the movie.
And if they didn't, there could be grade repercussions.
The parents were required to watch, along with the 11-year-old little sponges, those skulls full of mush that'll soak up anything with a sob story in it, polar bears, and you name it.
So, our stalwart conservative, regular listener to this program, someone who knows me fairly well, now believes Al Gore's movie.
You know, I love Rush and I ain't rent, but we're destroying our planet, is what I was told she said.
Very worried about the polar bears.
Very worried about the polar bear.
You know, I've got it in the global warming stack that's been accruing.
Do you know that polar bears at the North Pole are increasing in population?
They are not decreasing.
There are more polar bears.
And guess what?
An expedition to the North Pole to conduct a global warming study had to be canceled because of freezing temperatures below what humans can tolerate, snow and ice.
Just announced yesterday.
They had to cancel a global warming excursion at a North Pole.
So I said to a friend here to tell her friend, well, just go get the New York Times.
I take this personally.
This woman has been a steady listener of this program and doesn't really need me to reinforce her own instinctive conservatism.
You had this one little stupid propaganda movie that she had to watch in order to protect her daughter's grade, folks, now thinks we're destroying the planet.
So I said, go get the New York Times because I have it right here.
The New York Times has done a mini-hit piece on Al Gore and his movie.
And this piece is replete with scientist after scientist after scientist who says that Al Gore cannot make the claims he's making and substantiate them in terms of science.
And Al Gore admits in this piece, well, yes, we're just, we're right on the fundamentals, though.
That is, the world is warming and man's responsible for it.
And they go find scientists who disagree with this.
And the headline of this piece is from a rapt audience, a call to cool the hype.
And most of these scientists are talking about this movie.
They're talking about this piece of propaganda, this documentary, an inconvenient truth.
It prints out to four pages.
I don't have the time nor the inclination to read the whole thing to you.
We will link to it at rushlimbaugh.com.
But famous, in fact, Roy Sanders, who called this program from the University of Alabama at Huntsville, who was a great global warming skeptic, is quoted in this piece, as are a number of others.
Here's one, Don Jay Easterbrook, who later in the piece says, I'm not a Republican.
I have nothing to do politically with this.
He is an emeritus professor of geology at Western Washington University.
He said, I don't want to pick on Al Gore, but there are a lot of inaccuracies in the statements that we're seeing.
And we have to temper that with real data.
Now, Al Gore, in an email exchange about the critics that the Times asked him to respond to, said his work made the most important and salient points about climate change, if not some nuances and distinctions that scientists might want.
The degree of scientific consensus on global warming has never been stronger, he said.
And he added that I'm trying to communicate the essence of it in the lay language that I understand.
He's admitting he's not a scientist.
He's just an evangel.
He's an evangelist on this stuff.
This piece really, really hits Gore hard, and particularly on this movie.
And of course, here's Gore saying the scientific consensus on global warming has never been stronger.
They can't have consensus in science.
Science is not subject to a vote.
In addition to all of the inaccuracies and statements that we are seeing, we have to temper that with real data.
I've got to take a break here.
If I keep going here, I'm going to be way too long.
So let me highlight a couple things from this when we come back.
Sit tight.
The El Rushboat program amidst billowing clouds of fragrant aromatic first and secondhand cigar smoke returns after this.
I get emails.
What are you singing?
I mean, you look like you're listening to the music during the break.
I do.
I listen to music during the break.
I have a rotation of tunes I listen to in there.
I was just listening to a song by Gary Pubick and a Union Gap from 1968 called This Girl is a Woman.
Now she's finally learned how to say no.
But I rotate them around, and there's just a bunch of them.
Anyway, 800-282-2882, if you want to be on the program, more from this New York Times piece, James Hansen, environmental scientist, director of NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies, top advisor to Mr. Gore, said Al does an exceptionally good job seeing the forest for the trees, saying often that Gore did so better than scientists.
Still, Dr. Hansen said his work may hold imperfections and technical flaws.
He pointed to hurricanes, which are an icon for Al Gore, who highlights the devastation of Hurricane Katrina in this movie and cites research suggesting that global warming will cause both storm frequency and deadliness to rise.
Yet this past Atlantic season produced fewer hurricanes than forecasters predicted, five versus nine, and none of them hit the U.S.
And you know what it was?
It was either sand from the Sahara Desert or an El Niño.
And they don't know.
But everybody was predicting horrible hurricane season.
If we got rising global temperatures and the oceans are rising temperatures, the oceans are rising, and this is something that we can't reverse, then how in the name of hell do you explain so few hurricanes last year after the previous year?
How the hell do you explain the fact these people have to cancel their excursion to the North Pole to study global warming because it's too damn cold to get up there?
Too much snow and ice.
If there's global warming, it's global warming.
And we never hear from the media.
We have these kind of stories.
Well, maybe this global warming thing isn't totally true.
Never.
You wait till we get to June and July and it gets hot like it does in the summer.
And we're going to have some high temperatures in places.
Global warming.
Oh, no, it's melting.
The sidewalks are melting.
It's just, I can make a book on it.
Dr. Hansen said of Mr. Gore, we need to be more careful in describing this hurricane story.
Gore then defended his message as fundamentally accurate.
Of course, there will be questions around the edges.
And we have to rely upon the scientific community to continue to ask and to challenge and answer those questions.
It's not about science.
You even said so at the Epidemic Awards.
It has nothing to do with science.
This is about a moral issue.
And that's how the left sells their big government high-tax programs.
And that's all this is about.
Try this.
A report last June by the National Academy seemed to contradict Gore's portrayal of recent temperatures as the highest in the past millennium.
Now, that's a thousand years.
For you people in Rio Linda, a millennium is a thousand years.
And Gore's out there saying our temperatures now are higher than they've been a thousand years.
Instead, the report said current highs appeared unrivaled since only 1600, the tail end of a temperature rise known as the medieval warm period.
1600 it was warmer, and of course, none of the things that Gore says are causing global warming were happening then.
Nowhere does Mr. Gore tell his audience that all of the phenomena that he describes fall within the natural range of environmental change on our planet, said Robert M. Carter, marine geologist, James Cook University in Australia.
Nor does he present any evidence that climate during the 20th century departed discernibly from its historical pattern of constant change.
Now, I'm just going to be honest with you.
You people have seen this and your kids are coming home bellyaching.
I am disappointed in you falling for this tripe.
It's gutless.
You all want to just be a bunch of followers?
I'm just talking to select few of them.
You're buying into this property and I grow up and wake up and understanding what's happened to you.
Absolutely.
Hubba-hubba.
And we're here at the cutting edge of societal evolution, El Rushbaugh and the EIB network.
One more global warming story among many in the stack.
And this is from the UK.
It's from The Guardian.
I mean, this is as far left a rag as you can get.
Working men earning more than £40,000 a year are responsible for the lion's share of climate change emissions from personal travel.
According to an Oxford University survey, it found that one in five people are responsible for 61% of climate change emissions from private transport, and that most of these are well-off men.
Well, now it's got everything.
Now, global warming has feminism in it.
Now it's got an attack on prosperity, which is really the root of it.
It has male bashing throughout.
It doesn't say anything here about accomplished women and so forth.
Now these statistics that get bandied about here.
One in five people responsible for 61% of climate change.
How about the fact that 1% of the U.S. population pays something like 28% of all taxes and 5% pay close to 50?
Never hear about it.
But this is just absurd.
High-earning men blamed over climate change.
Now, what do you think the purpose of this is?
Guilt.
Transfer guilt to get people to buy into all of this rot gut BS.
You know, I really, you parents out there that are falling for this because your little screaming kids are coming home going, wow, mommy, mommy, the polar bears.
We're killing the polar bear.
Tell the kid to grow up and shut up and tell the kid that Gore is a liberal Democrat, just like the United.
You know all this.
Why are you falling for it?
Good grief out there.
Where is individual thought?
Where is individual thinking?
Why does everybody want to be not everybody, but you people know who I'm talking about.
Why do people want to be so gullible?
They get sucked into all this stuff.
What?
No, don't give, don't give me this.
Snerdley's out there saying if I don't get into the schools, we're going to lose the next generation.
I've been hearing how we're going to lose the next generation my whole life.
We're not going to lose the next generation next year.
Education is one area that we do need to get into, but you know how I hate school.
I'm not going to them.
What they ought to do is get this great global warming swindle that ran on Channel 4 to Great Britain and put that in these schools.
I'm kidding.
I'm not kidding.
Get that movie.
Get the great global warming swindle and put it in there.
Just as a credited bunch of scientists put that together, as did Al Gord, his stupid piece of propaganda.
This really infuriates.
I'm not acting.
I'm not ratcheting this up for you.
When I hear about these kind of stories, I wonder where are people's brains?
Where's their independence?
Where is the lifetime of accumulated knowledge about the people who do this kind of stuff?
How can it just so easily be tossed out the kitchen window?
Polar bears for crying out about polar bears.
I knew, I knew when I was a kid that we started humanizing animals as cartoon characters, that people are going to go think they get in a lion cage and pet the thing.
And when they get eaten, oh my God, look what?
Yes, a tiger is a tiger.
It isn't Tony pouring your frosted flakes with skim milk.
And a pink panther is a, there isn't, there's no such thing as a pink panther.
A panther is just as bad as a tiger if you get its way.
A jaguar?
Got a great car, jaguar.
Yeah, well, you get in the cage with a jaguar and you're finished.
They don't know their names.
They don't know any of this garbage.
They don't have names.
They all look alike to each other.
They notice each other by smell.
If jaguar was in two inches, you couldn't smell it.
But it could smell you and it wouldn't care what you were calling it.
Come here, Jaggy.
Come here.
Hell, story today.
Japanese fishermen trying to rescue a sperm whale about 10, what?
What is it?
10-yard, a big sperm.
We're trying to rescue.
The whale killed him.
Whale didn't know it was in trouble.
The whale didn't know these humans had well intentions, try to save it.
Well, killed one of the guys, two of them got away just trying to rescue the thing.
Look, I love animals.
You people understand this.
I melt around.
I love them just like everybody else does, but I'm not an idiot.
And this polar bear thing, it's that one picture.
It is that one picture of these two polar bears that appear stranded on what's left of a mammoth glacier, and it's nothing bigger than your average jungle gym.
And people see this, the kids, mommy, mommy, and the kids are crying at night, afraid to go to bed, afraid to wake up, all kinds of panic and fear, and the parents don't want screaming kids around, so it's either riddle them or let them believe in Al Gore's movie.
This furiates me.
It just infuriates.
The whole polar bear photo is a hoax.
It was an ice flow.
It was ice sculpture actually created by the waves, and the bears are out there playing on it.
It's not the remnants of a glacier that's detached and floating aimlessly out there, and the bears are not stranded.
They can go 65 to 100 miles in the ocean swimming.
Now there's more of them at the North Pole than anybody knew.
Pretty soon, we're going to have to start shooting them.
Wait till that starts happening.
Now we got high-earning men blamed for too many carbon emissions.
Everything I've told you about this, right out there in the open to be seen by inquiring open minds, sometimes I ask, what is the point?
What is the point?
Somebody who's a regular listener to this program for years, a solid conservative kid can come home from school and say, mommy, you've got to go with me and watch the Al Gore movie because if you don't, I get punished on my grades.
The parents show up, they watch it, and they have the same attitude that an 11-year-old has.
I feel like doing a Howard Dean scream here.
All right.
I'm going to rely on you people on the phones to bail me out here and save me.
Let's go to the phones.
Barry in, what is this?
Denham, Massachusetts.
Hi, Barry.
Thanks for waiting, sir.
Yeah, Rush.
You know, I'm Fred Thompson.
The times I've read about him, considering his run in the liberal press or even on like AOL News Online, they always have the headline caption, TV actor, seeking possible nomination.
And they don't mention the fact that he was United States Senator and a lawyer during the Watergate period and that kind of thing.
They try to minimize it, like TV actor.
They don't mention he was a senator.
Some of them are.
No, no, no.
Some of them are, but they are hyping he's an actor.
Yeah, but it's meant to denigrate it like oh, if they could.
Yes, I know.
Does that bother you?
Would it bother you that Fred Thompson's an actor in addition to everything else that he is?
No, not at all.
But they don't mention that he's a U.S. Senator.
Well, yes, they do.
Well, I'm saying they have to.
See, one thing.
Stop with the McNeil-Lerror go.
Why are you?
Of course McNeil-Lerror is going to hammer the guy.
What are you doing watching?
Oh, no.
when it comes on, you know...
Well, AOL!
AOL may as well be as far left as you can get.
Of course they're going to try to destroy any conservative.
AOL, there's nothing biased.
That's Time Warner.
Hell, the other day when we had this problem with the Fox News debate being canceled by the Nevada Democrats over the supposed joke Ailes told, you sign on to AOL and there's Ailes made out to look like some sort of buffoon and they rip it into Ailes for his insensitivity and a joke about Obama.
The dumb almost had a bleep myself.
The idiots don't even have the nut.
It was a joke about Bush.
It was not a joke about Obama.
Now, I understand your fear.
You turn on AOL and you know how many people are using AOL.
And I agree with you.
They're creating a bunch of just mind-numbed robot sponges, skulls full of mush that are adults.
They get up and read this stuff.
But believe me, people that count know that Fred Thompson's a senator.
As far as he being an actor, fine and dandy.
It means he understands television, understands how to use it.
Ronald Reagan, Renoglus Magnus, was an actor as well.
Let the Dems denigrate it all they want.
You know, these people are not the paragons of virtue out there, but a bunch of dullards.
If it weren't for their varicose veins, these people would be totally colorless.
Hillary Clinton, give me a break.
Let me ask you a question.
If her last name weren't Clinton, would anybody have ever noticed her?
No.
I've asked you people constantly, what is it?
Recommends Hillary Clinton to be president.
What has she done to put herself in a sweepstake zip-zyronata that succeeded?
She is a roaring, big-time, glaring failure.
And if her name weren't Clinton, you wouldn't have heard about her.
You wouldn't know who she was.
She'd still be wearing those big Coke bottle glasses, Birkenstocks, wandering around the campus of Wellesley.
You wouldn't know who she is if her name weren't Clinton.
Sense of entitlement, sense of it's her turn.
That's why she's there.
The same thing with all these other candidates.
Barack Obama, what's he done?
Looks good.
Clean and articulate for a black guy, said Joe Biden.
Well, that stands out, I guess, huh?
And what else we got?
Who else win this race?
Those are the two biggies.
Who else is out there?
Biden.
Yeah, Mr. Hair Care for Men.
Go to Chia Pit.
What are we talking about?
Where is this notion that every one of these damn Democrats is a paragon of something?
Virtue, competence, or what have you.
So Fred Thompson comes along.
AOL and McNeil Lair want to make him out to be just an actor.
Rudy Giuliani, whatever his kids say about him, is a rotten family guy, horrible, blah, blah, too tough.
McCain leave McCain aside.
Who else out there?
McCain, Rudy, Fred Thompson.
Who's the other guy?
No, no, there's another brownback.
Yes, but it doesn't matter.
They're trades a bunch of kooks.
But Romney.
Yeah.
Oh, yeah.
Yeah.
Polygamy all over his family.
He's the only guy that's only been married once in the whole campaign.
They're making jokes about his hair.
His hair's too perfect.
They don't talk about the brick girl that's left to us.
Edwards, what an empty suit.
The guy gets where he is because as a tort trial lawyer, he wows a jury that probably believes Al Gore's movie.
He wows a jury by channeling the thoughts of a girl who has died.
And the jury melts and wards the clients like $60 million.
And Ergo, Edwards now has a 28,000 square foot house somewhere in North Carolina, 2,800 square foot beach house somewhere in an island in North Carolina near Wilmington.
And of course, all of this is lauded as great, great work.
How many years have we been talking here about the standard process by which every conservative Republican is denigrated, every liberal is what they are, and an Al Gore's stupid ass movie come along?
Guys, it's just too many kids running their parents' house.
That's what's happening here.
I'll tell you another thing about cats, folks.
If my cat, my little cat, Punkin, if she were bigger, she would eat me.
She wouldn't care, even though she loves me.
If she were able to, do a lot of things.
You ought to see the way she did with the little lizards.
I rescue more lizards than you people would believe.
Chase is her.
No, Punkin, those are our friends.
They eat the insects.
She doesn't care.
Just bang them with the paws up the side of the corner and so forth.
And these things don't stand a chance.
Well, I can't send her out the turtle.
Punkin will not go on grass.
So I'm not have to worry about her walking away.
She, for some reason, doesn't like grass.
Now, about the polar bears, here's another thing.
And I'm talking to you, parents.
Kids have an excuse.
They're dumb.
They haven't lived long enough to acquire a bunch of knowledge.
Kids are, by definition, sponges.
When they're 10, 11, 12 years old, but you parents ought to know better.
If something happened at the North Pole, it warmed up.
I guarantee you, just like with the caribou, when we put in the Alaska pipeline, everybody says, oh, we're going to destroy the habits of the caribou.
They're going to be.
There are more of them than ever because they like the warmth of near the pipeline.
They've been procreating like crazy with no condoms.
They're more caribou than ever.
Same with polar bears.
Population is growing up there.
I'll tell you this.
If it happened to get so cold as they're predicting or so hot, whatever, they'd adapt.
We have them in zoos and they live, do they not?
Polar bears do not need glaciers.
They do not need ice.
Yes.
They're more comfortable, but they'll adapt.
Man, it's got to be.
I mean, even with parents, it's got to be the education system is so woefully incompetent and inept.
Economics, biology, science, history, you name it.
And you couple that with an affluent society like ours.
And the baby boom generations focus on me, and all this awareness and self-consciousness.
And people are just, they're just, they're just waving receptacles for guilt.
And that's what they're using to play on all these is guilt.
Ask your friend, what the hell has she done or her kid done to cause one bad thing to happen to a single element of life on this planet, other than maybe stomp on a fly, swat a fly or whatever.
In terms of the polar bears, what in the world?
Change subject.
Prosecutors yesterday, this is the Australia Herald son, New Zealand Herald's son.
Prosecutors yesterday demanded that a Jakarta court punish the editor of Playboy Indonesia with a two-year jail term for distributing indecent pictures to the public and making money from them.
But more than 100 Muslim protesters in the courtroom criticized the prosecution for being soft, shouting, hang him, hang him.
Now, would you not agree with me that an editor, a publisher, somebody high up in management at Playboy Anywhere is a liberal?
Would you not?
The odds are.
You leftists, I'm telling you, you don't think there's a problem with al-Qaeda and the Islamo-fascists, you are going to be the first they come for.
They are going to want to be had you and every part of you that they think you're responsible for in terms of debasing the culture.
You libs, you think you're currying favor with these people by hoping we lose in Iraq and the whole war on terror.
You doing everything you can here to paint this on Bush.
If we do happen to ever down the road to lose to these people, you are the first they're coming for.
To the extent that they dislike us because of our debased culture, guess who they're going to aim at first?
All right, who's first here?
Next.
Dawn in Colville, California.
Hi, Dawn.
Welcome to the program.
Hey, Rush.
Great to talk to you.
Thank you.
Yeah, I just wondered what you thought about Nancy Pelosi twice fleeing the news crew first and then the coat pink babes that were camped out on her front lawn here in California the past two days.
Yeah, we reported this yesterday.
These people crossed the Golden Gate Bridge.
There weren't that many of them.
There were 10 of them, I read in the report yesterday.
And they were actually having wine and cheese as part of the protest.
And they were demanding that Pelosi get us out of Iraq, so forth.
I'm not surprised she'd run away from them.
Yeah, she's not a good person.
What did you expect her to do?
Do you expect her to go out there and have a commune-type conference with them?
Well, here in California on the news, you rarely see stories like this.
They had her fleeing when she heard that the news crew was on their way the day before, and then they apparently camped out on her lawn overnight, and she was fleeing before dawn to get a plane out.
Yeah, her fleeing before dawn to get her plane out.
Air Pelosi.
Tell you something.
These Democrats are sowing the seeds of their own defeat, not just with conservatives, but with the far left.
Every time they empower them, like pulling out a Fox debate or passing one of these stupid, meaningless resolutions, and the far left never going to be satisfied with whatever they do until those troops are home and until the Iraqis, the Iranians and Al-Qaeda are waving the victory flag.
They are not going to be happy, and they're not going to be bought off by these meaningless, non-binding resolutions.
And they owe all of this, Pelosi owes all this to herself for empowering these literally insane nutburgers and kooks.
This wandering parade of human debris known as the kook fringe on the blogs out there exist purely because they've been empowered by the Democrats who don't have the guts to stand up to them.
Because they need them for fundraising or think they do.
Latest story, by the way, on why the Democrats pulled out of the debate is because Dingy Harry heard that his ratings had fallen from the 80s to the 40s on a couple of kuk fringe blogs.
That's what they're actually saying.
That's why Dingy Harry did a 180.
I don't know if it's true, but that's what they are claiming.
And those idiot Iranians are upset over the new Hollywood movie 300.
We'll talk about that in Peter Pace, The Democrats in a War in Iraq.
▲
Export Selection