All Episodes
Previous Next
Feb. 20, 2007 - Rush Limbaugh Program
34:49
February 20, 2007, Tuesday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Ah, greetings and welcome back, ladies and gentlemen.
We are back in the saddle here at the Golden EIB network and the uh Well, it is a golden network.
It's also a golden microphone.
This the prestigious Attila the Hun chair of the well-known think tank, the Limbaugh Institute for Advanced Conservative Studies.
Looking forward to talking to you even more as this hour gets underway.
Telephone number 800-282-2882.
There's interesting story today or column.
Well, it's a story.
It's in the New York Sun.
It's by Alicia Cologne, and it's entitled Heroes and Cowards, but here's the interesting paragraph.
The total military dead in the Iraq war between 2003 and this month stands at about 3,133.
This is tragic, uh, as are all deaths due to war, and we are facing a cowardly enemy, unlike any other in our past that hides behind innocent citizens.
Each death is blazoned in the headlines of newspapers and internet sites.
What is never compared is the number of military deaths during the Clinton administration.
Would you like to hear the totals?
In 1993, there were 1,245 military deaths.
In 1994, 1,109 military deaths.
In 1995, 1,055 military deaths.
1996, 1,008.
That is 4,417 deaths in peacetime.
But of course, who is counting?
Now you might wonder, well, she doesn't cite the source of these uh figures.
Uh but we found them.
There's a Department of Defense PDF file on death rates that uh you can download.
I went to download it, I got it, and in subsequent attempts after that uh the site was either down or it was it was uh locked and loaded.
The the point here is uh, of course, these 4,417 deaths between 1993 and 1996, those are deaths in peacetime, those are for the most part accidental deaths.
More deaths, and and you've heard people say this.
I I just wanted to get this uh out there and on the record, more deaths in four years of the Clinton administration due to military accidents than deaths in Iraq.
And if you look at this PDF um you you will find that in 1980, which was the last year of the uh uh Carter administration, there were more, I mean, far more military deaths in 1980 than in any year of the Bush administration.
The death rate was also higher.
Uh and and uh, you know, there was that's because of differences in the care given to training and uh and standards and so forth.
Uh the the point here is is that we're fighting the Iraq war with uh lower casualties than casualties expected from training accidents during peacetime.
And I mention this just to show you how out of proportion and agenda-oriented the death count in Iraq is.
Now, we've mentioned this before as a matter of theory and prophecy.
But here it is documented.
And these numbers are available to anybody.
Any journalist could go to the Department of Defense site and uh and and take a look and find these numbers.
There's no interest on the part of any journalist to uh to do so.
Uh, because it would confound the uh the agenda and the purpose of tallying up these deaths, because these 3,133 deaths form the basis, do they not?
If we got to get out of there.
Well, this is out of control.
Why, 3,133 battlefield.
Whoa, this is horrible.
We we support the troops, we got to get them out of harm's way, and a pointless unjust war, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.
When in fact, uh this war is rather successful.
Uh, in uh in terms of the number of deaths versus an especially when you compare it to the number of uh troops who have been uh deployed.
Uh by the way, the Washington Post twice has uh spanked Jack Mertha in a in an editorial.
Uh, I guess it was this Tuesday.
I don't know, Friday or Saturday.
The dates uh the dates run together.
Uh the the Washington Post editorialized and excoriated Jack Mirtha, uh, not just for his plan to elevate the Democrats on the backs of the troops in Iraq, but also about his relative ignorance about all this.
Listen to some of these excerpts.
Mr. Mirtha has a different idea.
He would stop the surge by crudely hamstringing the ability of military commanders to deploy troops.
In an interview carried Thursday by the website moveCongress.org, and we played you these uh these sound bites.
The Washington Post says, why not straightforwardly strip the money out of the bill?
An action Congress is clearly empowered to take rather than try to micromanage the army in a way that may be unconstitutional.
Because Mr. Murtha said it will it will deflect accusations that he's trying to do what he's trying to do.
The Post catches up with what he's trying to do.
They are lying to everybody.
They're trying to make people think they're doing one thing while they're doing another.
Mirtha isn't he doesn't have the guts to defund these people, don't have the guts to vote on that.
They only have the guts to vote on something that's non-binding, and the reason for the slow bleed is that it will deflect accusations that Murtha's trying to do what he's trying to do.
What we are saying will be very hard to find fault with.
Well, it's not hard to find fault with it, with anybody paying half attention to what he suggests.
The slow bleed is the term alone that they're so proud of.
Remember, it's all cloaked under the umbrella of we support the troops.
The Post continued.
Mr. Murtha's cynicism is matched by an alarming ignorance about conditions in Iraq.
He continues to insist that Iraq would be more stable with us out of there, in spite of the consensus of U.S. intelligence agencies that the early withdrawal would produce massive civilian casualties.
Would somebody this this is really a good point.
Somebody explained to me how in the world it is that, and Mirtha has said this, that the minute we get out of there, Al Qaeda will leave Iraq and will leave us alone.
This is why I personally, and I don't know anybody else, I personally am questioning is mental prowess right now.
There that is not that's that that's not just ignorance.
Um years ago, a guy like Jack Murtha, decorated Marine, would never have said anything like this.
There is uh pardon the sniffles again, folks, still suffering the ravages of uh by the way, this was not a cold.
It's not a cold, it's hasn't been a cold, it's uh it's uh something else.
I mean, not even antibiotics have worked on this.
The famed Z Pac.
Well, something's working on it.
It's maybe it's better than it was last week, but uh anyway, as they say here, it would be nice to believe that Mr. Murtha does not represent the mainstream of the Democrat Party or the thinking of its leadership.
Yet when asked about Mr. Murtha's remarks Thursday, Nancy Pelosi offered her support.
Does Ms. Pelosi really believe that the debate she orchestrated this week was not the real vote?
If the answer is yes, she's maneuvering her party in a way that can only do it harm.
Uh this is the Washington Post, folks.
And E.J. Dion Jr. today in the Washington Post, the anti-war rallying point.
His basic, I'm not going to read a whole thing to you here, is uh but the Mirtha is hamstringing the military and the war for political gain and could doom the effort.
Here's the line.
The sense that the proposal has been crafted in part for reasons of political convenience and the intricate restrictions it would place on the military are precisely what could doom it.
The war's opponents need other options, not Jack Mirtha.
This is E. J. Dion Jr. today.
The Washington Post editorializing same thing over the weekend.
Uh basically, folks, we we have somebody who is at the least incoherent in Congressman Mertha.
I and perhaps delusional.
Uh Or worse.
We'll be back and continue here in just a second.
All right, we're going to go to the phones.
I still have loads of stuff here.
Plus audio soundbice.
They got a whole Obama segment.
Would you believe that there was controversy in the drive-by media?
Yes, there would.
I can say anything and there's controversy about it.
Remember Obama said the other day that uh uh well what did he say?
He said uh he didn't decide whether it's black.
He didn't decide that.
Uh i if you look African American in this society, you're treated that way.
And I said, that's a hell of a thing.
To have that much of your life not be under your control.
I said, if you don't like it, renounce it.
Oh.
Nuclear explosions throughout the drive-by media.
We will relive that episode because there's a lot more Obama news.
Try the headlines.
Did Obama take too much credit?
Obama memoir left out credits for activism critics say.
Looks like Obama pulled a Mike Barnacle on his book.
Uh and the LA Times on uh February 19th.
LA Times Obama not black enough.
Stories will not go away.
In the meantime, Jack in Wimberley, Texas.
Welcome to the EIB network, sir.
Nice to have you with us.
Thank you, Rush.
You're my leader, my mentor, and you know a lot about a lot of things, but you don't know the Prius automobile.
Well, I mean I don't know the Prius automobile.
I've never met one.
Uh I've have you ever seen them tooling around.
They look like Jetsons mobiles that don't fly, but other than that, I've never really driven one.
That's that's what I figure by the way you talk.
I've heard you say one time and you hit on them a while ago.
I just had to call, but heard you say one time that they don't accelerate.
When I went and went in a demonstrator and went up on the freeway, there are a couple of eighteen wheelers close by.
So I kicked it pretty good.
You don't hear anything and you really move, and I told the salesman, wow, this thing got up and moved pretty good.
Okay, what's it?
You're driving 95 miles an hour.
Whoopee.
Now that that's plenty fast for me, baby.
What is it what does it do zero to sixty?
How much time does it take to go zero to sixty?
Do you know?
Does the owner's manual say have you tried it?
No.
No.
And and I don't think.
Well, I have three cars that do it in under five seconds and neither of them are prius.
And you know, a Ferrari will do better.
No, I don't have a Ferrari.
Jaguar will do better.
Pardon me?
A jaguar will do better, as the English would say.
What I have makes a Jaguar look like a Prius.
Well, I'm sure that's a good one.
I've got me clarifying you gotta remember the common folk and what we do.
I've never been excited or haven't been excited about a new automobile for a number of years.
And this one I really truly enjoy driving.
You know something?
I've never been a car guy.
I I've never been one of these uh, you know, ne'er do wells with the rear end jacked up so high in the back that you need a stepladder to get in a trunk and all these people run around and run a drag races, can't run drag races because I don't have my mags.
I've never been I've never been cars have never been a big deal to me until uh what was it 2000, what is this, 2000 uh this is 2002 or three.
I bought the finest car I've ever owned, and I appreciate this car more than any car I've ever had.
Uh uh but up until then, uh no big deal to me.
And I don't care that you have a Prius.
Well, my only point about the Prius, and I I don't mean to condemn it.
I just I think it's it's a vanity buy.
It's an emotional buy.
They're being sold to you on the basis.
No, no, I don't I don't I don't get emotional about that.
I was in the oil business all my life.
Well, why okay that you are you're you're you're buying this for a political reason.
You're buying this.
No, I'm not.
I'm buying I'm buying it because my wife said she wanted one.
Well, okay, I left that out.
Uh you don't have you don't have that type of training right now.
Um but that's uh uh it's an exciting car to drive.
I have a very good friend that's retired.
We live in a retirement area.
He's got a Lexus and his wife has a Prius.
He drives his wife's Prius.
Well, look, about the fact that I don't have that type of training right now.
Once you get that type of training, you never forget it.
That's right.
I've been married for 54 years.
Yeah.
Uh Well, what do you think of this story I've got coming up?
Study men hardwired to ignore their wives.
Doesn't sound like they talk to you.
No.
Well, I may call back.
No, enjoy your program and enjoy all you have to say.
But don't knock the Prius till you tried it, baby.
Okay, baby.
I'm not knocking the Prius.
It's just like I don't knock labor unions per se.
Just understand what you're doing if you join one.
I would never tell somebody, you shouldn't become a member of the union.
I mean, it's let them do it.
If you want to buy a Prius, go buy it.
But if you think you're saving the planet, and if you think you're s you're retarding global warming, get real.
You're being sold a bill of goods by a bunch of Hollywood leftists in the car companies who are trying to get in good with uh, you know, all the conventional wisdom on global warming and so forth.
Uh, by the way, got a huge global warming stack here today that's just hilarious.
Some of the uh some of the things that uh that are in it.
Anyway, here's here's a story uh from uh a couple days ago, New York Times.
Clinton gives war critics a new answer on her O2 vote.
I talked about this in the uh in the first hour.
One of the most important decisions that Senator Clinton made about her bid for the presidency came late last year when she ended a debate in her camp over whether she should repudiate her 2002 vote authorizing military action in Iraq.
Several advisors and friends and donors said in interviews that uh they had urged her to call her vote a mistake in order to appease anti-war Democrats who play a critical role in the nominating process.
Yet Mrs. Clinton herself, backed by another faction of her supporter group, never wanted to apologize, even if she viewed the war as a mistake, arguing that an apology would be a gimmick.
In the end, she settled on language similar to Senator Carey's when he was a Democrat nominee in 2004.
She said this that if she had known in 2002 what she knows now about Iraqi weaponry, she would never have voted for the Senate resolution authorizing force.
That, of course, led to the Bush tricked me scenario.
Which they had to get rid of that real fast, because if Bush can trick her, it means her husband has tricked her, Bush has tricked her, her brothers have tricked her.
What the hell is Mahmud Ahmadinejad gonna do?
This woman has made it plain that she is very easily tricked, even though that's all BS because we have gone back and played for you and posted on the website her actual statements uh on the floor of the Senate before the vote, and when she was talking to Code Pink babes, she said, This research is mine.
She told them they were wrong.
This all of this is nothing but political posturing.
We still do not have the real Hillary Clinton.
The real Hillary Clinton would be someone who says I voted for that war because I believed it was necessary, but she didn't have the guts to be who she is because of the anti-war crowd in the Democratic Party.
That's why I'm convinced they are in charge of Democrat Party foreign policy rather than the candidates themselves.
So despite saying that she was tricked, that if she had known in 2002 what she knows today, she would have never voted for it.
The anti-war anger has festered.
And so on February 17th, Mrs. Clinton rolled out a new response.
She said she was willing to lose support from voters rather than make an apology she didn't believe in.
Yep, she said if the most important thing to any of you is choosing someone who did not cast that vote or has said his vote was a mistake, then there are others to choose from.
Meaning Obama and the Breck girl, John Edwards.
Her decision not to apologize regarded so seriously within her campaign that some advisors believe it'll be remembered as a turning point.
Uh either ultimately galvanizing voters against her or highlighting her resolve and her willingness to back or buck Democrat conventional wisdom if she if she wins.
I guess there's three positions that she's taken on this vote in 2002.
Uh and the latest one is if the most important thing to any of you is choosing somebody who didn't cast that vote, or has said his vote was a mistake, then there are others to choose from.
She's not going to apologize.
She's just she's gonna I guess she's gonna hang with the notion she got tricked.
She can hang with the notion that had she known then what she knows now.
I I'm telling you, this is in a in a in a world where people are not made up their minds and judging things, she'd be gone.
She would be she would have been gone so long ago.
There's nothing that recommends this woman to be president of the United States.
Nothing whatsoever.
No more than Minnie Mouse.
As far as I know, Mickey was never even disloyal to Minnie, was he?
Yes, the most dangerous man in America, and that's because I'm right.
And we are back at 800-282-2882.
All right, we have a series of uh Hillary Clinton sound bites.
We have her saying what I just quoted her as saying on Saturday in Dover, uh New Hampshire.
At any rate, let's go back.
Last Wednesday, uh Hillary saying the president acting under the cover of darkness.
This president was allowed for too long to commit blunder after blunder under cover of darkness, provided by an allied Republican Congress.
What the hell is she talking about?
He invaded Iraq in the sunshine with your blessing.
It was all done during the daytime.
Might have been some nighttime votes, but the cameras were what is this under the cover of darkness business?
Once again, she was tricked.
All that needs to happen for Hillary Clinton to miss something is for the sun to go down.
You know, if she is elected president, it will be nighttime at times.
Here she is on Saturday at this tri uh this this this town hall.
Uh unidentified reporter said, I remain in troubled, though, about your position on Iraq and your unwillingness to apologize to the American people for your vote to authorize the war.
This can't be a reporter.
So that this has to be some derelict member of the audience.
Unidentified reporter would say this.
Anyway, here's her answer.
If the most important thing to any of you is choosing someone who did not cast that vote or who has said his vote was a mistake, then there are others to choose from.
But to me, the most important thing now is trying to end this war.
If the president won't end this war before he leaves office, then I will.
And I have a very good idea about how that can and should be done.
Yeah, and I bet it's smarter and uh clearer.
Uh and then on her website, she says the redeployment would start in 90 days.
Now it's time to say the redeployment should start in 90 days, or the Congress will revoke authorization for this war.
Let's go back.
We quoted this October 10th, 2002.
This is Mrs. Clinton.
She's not going to apologize.
Bush tricked her.
If she'd have known then what she knows now, she wouldn't have voted for it.
Uh let's listen to her on the Senate floor, October 10th, 2002.
Today, Mr. President, we are asked whether to give the President of the United States authority to use force in Iraq should diplomatic efforts fail to dismantle Saddam Hussein's chemical and biological weapons and his nuclear program.
In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program.
He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including Al-Qaeda members.
It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons.
So it is with conviction that I support this resolution as being in the best interests of our nation.
It is a vote that says clearly to Saddam Hussein, this is your last chance.
Disarm or be disarmed.
This is a very difficult vote.
This is probably the hardest decision I've ever had to make.
Why?
Any vote that might lead to war should be hard.
Yes.
But I cast it with conviction.
Now she knows that the drive-bys are not going to go back and revive that.
She knows that nowhere on CNN will that ever be played.
She knows that nowhere on PMS NBC will that ever be played.
She knows that nowhere on ABC, CBS, NBC, New York Times, Washington Post, LA Times, will that ever be reprinted?
Only we, here in the new media, have the courage to go back and put her in juxtaposition today and yesterday, then and now, as she attempts to say Bush tricked her.
If she I didn't hear anything in that statement about the president says, and the president's intelligence agencies are telling us, she made it sound like she had researched it.
And that was a vote of conviction.
The woman is a fraud.
And the Democrats are allowing the kook fringe of their base to determine the foreign policy of this country, at least as they articulate it.
All right, back to the phones of Sherman and Albuquerque, New Mexico.
Welcome, Sherman.
Great to have you with us.
Hello, Rush.
I've been listening to you for almost 20 years, Rush.
So at any rate, listen, the reason why I'm calling is I believe we're in enlightened society, and I believe that while maybe the Prius isn't the answer to all our questions.
Wait a minute.
Would you define it, would you define enlightened society for me?
Because I I think parts of our society are enlightened and others are still clueless with their heads in the sand.
So who's and we're we're clueless if we don't recognize that we can't do an unchecked use of oil in our society without paying a price for it.
And so while the Prius may not be the answer, the concept of the Prius might be the answer.
What's the price that we're not paying?
The price is empowering a jihad by paying them in petrodollars.
That's why.
We wouldn't care less about the Middle East if it wasn't for the oil.
And I'm not saying the words about the oil, but they're empowered through our purchase of petrol dollars, and I'm not saying just us, but the whole world.
I happen to agree with you, but uh some in this country who you, I'm sure, would say are enlightened are totally opposed to ourselves finding our own stocks and supplies of oil.
I agree, but you know, Rush, that's only a band-aid.
We got to be an enlightened society, and the concept of the world.
It would not be a band-aid.
We've got the Chinese drilling in a Gulf of Mexico.
We got the Mexicans drilling in the Gulf of Mexico, we got the Cubans that are getting started to drill in the Gulf of Mexico, and we can't.
But an oil-based society is wrong, Roger.
No, it is not.
We're an oil-based society and we run the world.
We are the envy of the world economically, and we are the cleanest country in the world.
We clean up our messes.
This is what this is why you the Prius to you is a symbol.
It's exactly what I'm saying.
It is not practical.
I agree with you.
I agree with you on the symbol, but we gotta understand.
No, go ahead and finish.
I'm just kidding.
Oh, did he hang out?
Hey, go ahead and finish.
Go ahead and f he hung up.
All right, folks.
May as well get to the global warming stack here's the update theme.
The crazy world of Arthur Brown.
That song hit number two for a couple of weeks in 1968.
Uh, remember playing that as a struggling young disc jockey star of the future.
And we've intercut that with uh the wicked witch of the whatever melting from the Wizard of Oz.
By the way, when I first auditioned this tune, the three people on the other side of the glass here just revolted.
They just thought it was the worst sounding.
I saw them moving and grooving to it, as we just played.
Dawn, you didn't realize you were doing it.
You were sitting in there dancing like it was disco time.
All right.
I have some of the most hilarious and revealing stories in our global warming stack today.
From the San Francisco Chronicle on Sunday, a story by Jared Blumenfeld and Susan Leal.
Listen to this.
San Franciscans and other Bay Area residents enjoy some of the nation's highest quality drinking water with pristine Sierra snowmelt from the Hetch Hetchy Reservoir as our primary source.
Every year, our water is tested more than 100,000 times to ensure that it meets or exceeds every standard for safe drinking water.
And yet, we still buy bottled water.
Why?
Well, maybe because it's uh we think that bottled water is cleaner and somehow better, but that's not true.
The federal standards for tap water are higher than those for bottled water.
The environmental law foundation has just to stick with me on this, folks.
You'll see where this is headed.
The Environmental Law Foundation has sued eight bottlers for using words such as pure to market water that contains bacteria, arsenic, and chlorine.
Bottled water is no bargain either.
It costs 240 to 10,000 times more than tap water.
For the price of one bottle of Evian, a San Franciscan can receive 1,000 gallons of tap water.
Now stop and think of this.
For the price of one bottle of Evian, a San Franciscan can receive 10 or 1,000 gallons of tap water.
Forty percent of bottled water should be labeled bottled tap water, because that's exactly what it is.
Clearly, the popularity of bottled water is the result of huge marketing efforts.
The global consumption of bottled water reached 41 billion gallons in 2004, up 57% in just five years.
Even in areas where tap water is clean and safe to drink, such as San Francisco, demand for bottled water is increasing.
Most of the price of a bottle of water goes for its bottling, packaging, and shipping, marketing, retailing, and profit, transporting bottled water by boat, truck, and train involves burning massive quantities of fossil fuels.
More than five trillion gallons of bottled water is shipped internationally every year.
Here in San Francisco, we can buy water from Fiji, which is over 5,000 miles away, or Norway, over 5100 miles away, and many other faraway places to satisfy our demand for the chic and exotic.
These are truly the Hummers.
Bottled water, truly the Hummers of our bottled water generation.
Fiji and Norway bottled water.
Starting in 2007, the state of California will give five cents for recycling a small water bottle, ten cents for a larger one.
This thing, this story goes on and on with statistics left and right designed to stop people from drinking bottled water on the theory that it is leading to global warming, and on the theory that it is cheaper than tap, which it is.
I mean, there's no question.
I've often felt sorry for the big oil guys.
I mean, look at what they have to do to get oil and then turn it into refinable products.
And look at what these bottled water glies have to do is have to go to a spring or somebody's tap and turn it on, fill a bottle.
There's no RD, there's nothing.
It's just uh it's practically pure profit, but people think that it is safer anyway.
These two people in San Francisco have gone into great detail here, into expressing just how damaging to the environment bottled water is.
You could make the case after reading this that it is causing more environmental damage than oil.
Couple more quick things on global warming.
Oh, by the way, you see what Steve Jobs said about public school teachers.
Whoa.
Well, I don't know.
I don't know that he No, I don't think he's lost his mind at all.
It's just interesting in nobody criticizing him.
It just proves you have to be certain people to get away with saying certain things because he's Jobs is not saying anything about public school teachers that I haven't said, or that any Republican presidential candidate hasn't said, but they routinely get trashed and destroyed, discredited the kitchen sink thrown at them, but it's not happening to jobs.
Anyway, details coming up.
Just a couple quick things here.
Uh, this is from the independent, the UK independent.
Organic farming no better for the environment.
All of you people have the organic chicken, organic milk, organic this, or you think you're helping the environment, you're full of it.
Organic food may be no better for the environment than conventional produce, and in some cases is contributing more to global warming than intensive agriculture, according to a government report.
New 200-page document.
Uh reigniting the debate surrounding Britain's organic food industry, which experienced a 30% growth in sales last year.
It says organic foods no safer than chemically treated food.
It's another scam that the left has tried to trick us into.
And I don't buy this organic garbage.
I see it on the menu.
Organic this, organic that, grocery store.
Well, I don't go to the grocery store, but I instruct the staff.
You know, you're gonna get organic stuff, get it for yourself, but not for me.
You know, all organic means is it's grown in manure.
Or it's not grown a manure.
Yeah, it's grown in manure.
Organic is just it's just, it's just it's all natural.
And the idea that human beings destroy all of this is the underlying root of this garbage.
And it uh it it's it's rooted in the fact that these people do not believe in God.
I'm telling you, I've extrapolated on this many times before.
Uh see.
There's one other thing in this stack.
Well, there are a couple of the things here, but uh, Al Gore.
This is the final one I'll have time for.
Al Gore has been spending the bulk of his time, this is from the American Spectator today.
Uh Al Gore been spending the bulk of his time campaigning hard with voting members for the Oscars, committing more than half a million dollars of his own money to the PR campaign to set up to win him an Oscar.
I know producers of other movies go out and they do this kind of thing.
Well, I don't think they do this.
$500,000 a piece.
Well, they do, PR campaign.
They do buy their own ads and so forth.
But I thought he was a shoe in.
I'm surprised that Gore thinks he has to pay to win this.
I thought this movie, this what is it?
Inconvenient?
What truth?
I thought this was so wonderful.
I thought it was a shoe-in for a global warming or for an academy award.
He's gonna go out and buy it.
When Gore and his age were approached about providing similar dollar amounts, talking half million dollars here, in support of ending the slaughter in Darfur, Gore declined.
Say fundraisers for the Darfer initiative.
Isn't it surprising that Gore's willing to overlook other inconvenient angles in his pursuit to end global warming?
Despite advice from some of his environmental advisors, Gore is insisting that there be a musical performance of some kind from Antarctica during his July 7th inconvenient truth, 24-hour concert to end global warming.
Yeah, we'll send the Red Hot Chili Peppers down there.
A concert from Antarctica.
He's gonna pay for all that that he will not actually seeking corporate donations, but will not donate to the Darfer initiative to end the slaughter and the genocide there once an Academy Award for his stupid documentary.
Back in a second.
Hey, I'll give you the Steve Jobs uh attack on teachers' union details when we come back.
New York politicians once again advocating illegal aliens be given the right to vote.
▲
Export Selection