All Episodes
Previous Next
Feb. 16, 2007 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:17
February 16, 2007, Friday, Hour #3
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Uh that's right, uh Johnny Donovan, but all you ladies out there I'm already spoken for.
Spoken for for 47 years.
Anyway, we were at the last hour wrapping up and we're talking to Ann from Brooklyn.
Are you still there, Ann?
Yes, I am, and I have to disagree because it's not just the ladies who wish there were hundreds of thousands of you with anybody with a brain.
Oh, thank you, Ann.
But you were saying.
Okay.
When I was a child, it was a different world, and the New York Times would publish charity cases, and people would donate children, sent in dollar bills, and wealthy people sent in six-figure checks, and those days it was like a seven-figure check.
I I remember those uh March a dime campaigns.
Uh charity was something that everybody became involved in because the government was not taking away your money at the point of a gun.
And those appeals for charity stopped when the welfare state, the social estate, started saying, You pay us or you go to jail.
That's right.
And and they promoted the idea uh that one American has the right to live at the expense of another American.
Everybody gives according to somebody else's need.
And when it's voluntary and you want to do it, I believe it's a noble goal, and when it is forced and stolen from you, I just find it just dreadful.
And look what happened.
All the great museums and hospitals and orchestras, all the great voluntary works of art have just drizzled to almost a halt.
That's right.
The person from Louisville, Kentucky was totally incorrect.
Hospitals may make enormous charges, but simply because the illegal immigrants are causing them enormous losses.
That's absolutely right.
And I thank you for calling in to make those comments.
We need that kind of evidence from yesteryear.
Many of our people in our audiences.
They were just born uh or they don't have the experience of knowing uh the uh kind of generosity and the uh and the liberty that existed uh in America at one time.
But I what I want to do in this last hour, I want to talk about my colleague uh Thomas Sowell has written uh several columns and they're available at uh and you see it from Jewish World Review, and it's called Global Hot Air.
And and I also wrote a column about this as well, and you know, Americans are being taken for a ride on this whole global warming uh issue.
And it kind of reminds me of a of a quote from uh from uh uh from Mencken, Henry Mankin, uh, and he warned and he said, the whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed, and hence clamorous to be led to safety by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblums, all of them imaginary.
And we have people, the environmental the the in the radical environmentalist movement, uh they're kind of uh talking about uh getting trying to get Americans upset about global warming, and they're becoming quite vicious about it.
And some people like uh I I was utterly shocked when I found out that there's a doctor Heidi Cullen, and she's with the Weather Channel, she's uh uh climatologist, and she hosts a program called Climate Code, the climate code.
And she advocates now listen to this.
She advocates that the American meteorological society strip their seal of approval from any TV weatherman expressing skepticism about man-made global warming.
Uh there's a uh there's a Scott Pelle of CBS uh news uh 60 Minutes correspondence, and he compared skeptics of global warming to Holocaust deniers.
And even uh Vice President uh former Vice President Al Gore, he calls uh skeptics global warming deniers.
And There's one fellow, uh David Roberts, uh, in his online publication, he said, and get this, get this, folks.
He said, when we've finally gotten serious about global warming, when the impacts are really hitting us, and we're in a full world worldwide scram uh scramble to minimize the danger, we should have war crimes, war crime trials for these so and so's it begins with a B, some sort of climate Nuremberg.
Um, there are many highly respectable climatologists that don't buy all this hoopla about uh man-made global warming.
Now, there's no question that the earth can warm or cool.
Uh and as my colleague says, it has done this at one time or another for thousands of years, even before we had SUVs.
As a matter of fact, if there had never been global warming, uh we wouldn't be able to enjoy the Yosemite Valley today, because it was once under ice.
And so, how did it become not under ice?
It was through global warming.
And there are a number of climate experts who reject many of the fine findings of the so-called experts today, and and many of the so-called experts are just merely government affair officials or environmental uh wackos.
Uh one of those very distinguished climate scientists, uh, he's uh Robert uh Litsen of MIT, he publicly repudiated a report on global warming, even though his name was among those used as window dressing on the report.
Um it's kind of interesting that these people hype up global warming on unusually hot days of summer, or when it was uh near 70 in the Northeast.
But have you heard them talking about global warming within the last couple of weeks when uh much of the country has been under uh unprecedented uh freeze uh and they see no implication.
And how about the blame Bush uh a business during uh the uh hurricanes of uh uh was it 2005?
And um, and they said that it was a couple years ago, they said that these hurricanes, this large number of hurricanes, uh was uh it was hyped up by the media as being a result of global warming.
And they said that many more hurricanes, and they predicted many more hurricanes would occur the following year and years after.
Now, last year, not one hurricane struck the United States.
Have you heard the media say anything about that?
Uh you know, the they they've said little or nothing about the false predictions that they made.
And this is very similar to how the in the in the 1970s, I believe, and Thomas Sowell's pointing this out in his column, and actually he has he has a series of three columns, global uh uh, let's say global hot air uh one,
two, and three, and he puts uh he points out that, and I've pointed out before that in the 1970s, remember the Club of Rome, uh it was supposed to be the uh be all and end all of economic growth.
And they were predicting in 1970s that we need to halt overpopulation, and that because it was going to lead to mass starvation around the planet in the 1980s, uh, but Nobody goes back to the club of Rome and say, hey guys, nobody's starving.
And if there's a health problem, at least in the Western world, it's obesity.
People are eating too much.
There's too much food available.
Ladies and gentlemen, we're being we're being sold a bill of goods about man-made uh causes of uh global warm.
Now, keep in mind that you know the uh you know so far as uh as long as the uh the earth has been around, there have been cooling periods and there have been warming periods.
And these cooling periods and warming periods are a result of forces that have little or nothing to do with mankind.
Uh I mean, if you if you look at the warming that causes the Gulf Stream to go by uh uh Europe, uh well, if the Gulf Stream did not go by Europe, uh uh I mean uh Europe would be like uh Antarctica and it would be uh uninhabitable.
Uh so these people uh they're selling us uh uh a bill of goods, and we ought to be very, very disappointed uh by their desire not just to make the argument, but they want to suppress and intimidate skeptics.
Uh they want to call them uh uh global warming deniers.
And and interestingly, in the U.S. news today, US uh U.S. Today uh is point out that in Germany a court sentence a guy to five years in prison for denying the Holocaust.
Now, I'm wondering whether the global warming uh people, uh the environmental wackus, they're also willing to send people to jail for denying the uh man-made causes of global warming.
We'll be back with your calls after this.
We're back.
Uh Walt Williams filling in for Rush.
And um you know, there's another issue that uh in addition to global warming, and actually, these these people who are pushing uh this uh global warming bit, they're really after control of our lives.
That is, they want government control.
That is, communism has lost all res uh respectability except at some college campuses in the United States.
And so the new word for communism is environmentalism.
That is both talk about controlling the lives of uh of ordinary uh citizens.
Uh there's another issue that uh maybe we just have a few minutes to talk about uh as well, and that is Congressman Charlie Wrangle from uh New York.
Uh he's trying to uh he has plans, and I don't know whether he's done so in the first hundred hours or the first uh several days of the new Congress to reinstate the military draft.
And he says that uh that there's no question in his mind that uh this president uh would not have gone to war in Iraq if we had a draft.
Uh I I I think that's utter nonsense uh because we had a war in Vietnam, uh and we did have a draft.
And uh um but you know, there's a pet peeve of mine.
I don't call it a draft.
I hate to call it a draft.
What I call it is a confiscation of labor services.
That's the government comes along and confiscates one's uh labor services.
Uh so I think draft is just kind of euphemism euphemism for uh that act.
Um but however the the army or the military can get all the soldiers that they want.
They don't need a draft, they can just raise pay.
Uh matter of fact, there is a wage that they can pay me today, and I will sign up.
Uh but I caution you, uh it's a pretty high high wage.
But the uh the uh the volunteer army has been very very successful as a way of managing our military.
And one of the good things about the voluntary voluntary army is that you minimize the number of misfits that you get in the Army.
That is, you you minimize the number of people uh that are in the Army who don't want to be there.
And I speak from experience because uh in nineteen fifty-nine uh my labor services were confiscated.
And uh I was make I was uh uh earning four by four hundred dollars a month driving a taxi cab in Philadelphia, and I got this letter saying I had to begin making sixty-eight dollars a month, and the only way they can get me to switch that way is to threaten me with imprisonment.
And and and it turned out that I was quite a misfit in the Army, and um, you know, I was sent down uh to Fort Stewart, Georgia, without a very good orientation on the Southern way of life, and I had some adjustment problems and with uh adjustment problems that included uh a court martial, which I did win, and uh and investigations and uh and the FBI investigating Mrs. Williams and all this uh you know, a a lot of problems that I uh had in the Army.
But by the way, folks, I have an honorable discharge.
Uh so uh anyway, I think that anybody talking about the draft, uh, we ought to booze them away.
But uh let's go back to the phones.
Uh let's go to Edmund.
Um how do you pronounce your uh Los Cruces?
New Mexico, Las Cruces, yeah.
Yeah, right, great, great.
Okay, uh welcome show.
But look who's gonna rich, and that tells you all about uh who he's trying to appease at the street instructors and all the things that they're doing.
Nothing surprising you.
I don't get it.
They're putting that thing in the bars.
It's one more thing that rules like oh I see.
Oh, oh, okay, okay, great.
Okay, that's what you thought.
Okay, great.
Now I do want to go back to the word that you were using about uh how the Democrats try to say that you're given a right.
Yeah.
You need to change the and make the system deserve.
Well, even if you deserve it, you don't have a right to uh live at the expense of another person, do you?
No, that's it.
Yeah.
So what I called you about, Dr. Williams is I think you and I share something about uh Milton Friedman, and I'm just wondering how you feel about the statement that I that I'll make to you that he was probably the most significant man of the twentieth century.
Well, he was sure surely the greatest uh economist of the uh of the twentieth century.
Uh but it did so many other things.
He talked about draft like you do.
In fact, I just think you're kind of an extension of Dr. Friedman.
Well, I I've been highly influenced by him.
Matter of fact, uh uh when I was a graduate student at UCLA, I got my doctor from UCLA and Milton Friendman he visited, uh matter of fact, he he taught a class uh on monetary theory, and I was afraid to take the class of credit.
I just ordered it because I was just there, gee, this gray big giant.
And uh and we've been matter of fact, I've had Milton Friedman on the show a couple of times on the Rush Limbaugh show a couple times, and we've been calling.
I think he was uh the only I so much about him done on PBS, which I don't think would have been the optimal channel, but they did do a pretty decent job.
They still got a few, you know, jabs in for the most part I think they treated him pretty well.
Well, yeah, I think his series uh free to choose, and I think the book that he and his wife Rose uh Friedman uh wrote, I think that's an excellent uh reference uh uh for you to kind of get an idea of some of his more public work.
But he's a very distinguished economist as an economist.
He's done uh pathbreaking work on uh the uh consumption what we call the consumption function, and he virtually single hand single-handedly uh discredit much of the uh many of the Keynesian ideas that ruled economic economics for a very very long time, and the kind of Keynes the ideas that Keynes uh introduced, uh these are ideas that politicians had been looking for a long time.
That is ways to tax and spend.
And uh he he and others thoroughly discredited notions such as the uh uh the Phillips curve, the idea that there's a trade-off between uh unemployment and inflation, and then finally, I think some of his most uh notable work has been done in the area of monetary economics, where he has pointed out to people uh that um That inflation is not caused by rapacious businessmen or greedy unions.
It's caused by an increase in the money supply, and who's in charge of the money supply?
It's the central bank.
So when you see an inflation, what that means is that there's a increase in the money supply.
And that's the only way that you can get an inflation anywhere in the world at any time.
We'll be back.
We're going back to the phones.
Uh let's go to uh Dick in Garden of Vill, Nevada.
Good afternoon, Doctor.
First, uh may I thank you for the gift of your knowledge and humor, which is uh on some occasion almost call it the car wreck for me, but nonetheless, uh I do appreciate it.
Well, I'll pay the deductible if that happens.
We uh yeah, I was gonna call earlier about that because I understand the cost shifting and whatnot, but um I talked to HR and we have paid close attention to this issue of global warming, and uh one man who uh who uh is very renowned uh climatologist uh from Montreal, whose name now escapes me, after viewing uh Al's movie said, yes, it's it's truly absurd, isn't it?
Uh uh so I told my wife that the the the wackos have been very disappointed and that when the ice receded, as you pointed out, there was not a pterodactyl driving an SUV that that they attributed to.
And the absolute truth is the ice gaps are melting in Mars and there isn't a capitalist in sight up there.
That's absolutely right.
And and and in terms of uh of emitting uh CO2, carbon dioxide, um uh mankind's contribution is trivial compared to other sources of carbon dioxide.
Uh for example, a uh a volcan three volcanic eruptions, uh one in eighteen eighty-three in in Indonesia, another in Alaska in nineteen twelve, and another in Ila uh Iceland in nineteen forty-seven spewed more carbon dioxide and sulfur dioxides in the atmosphere than all of mankind's activity in his entire history.
And uh you probably know this too, that the Science Magazine, uh the November 1982 edition of Science Magazine, it reported that termites annually generate more than twice as much carbon dioxide as mankind does uh burning uh fossil fuels.
Uh so and so, and matter of fact, there's one termite that emits six hundred metric tons of formic acid into the atmosphere.
And so uh maybe what maybe what the environmentalists ought to recommend to Congress is to put lids on top of volcanoes, uh or or either kill all the ants, uh, because they they'd sure emit more carbon dioxide uh than mankind does.
But uh I am uh I never cease to be amazed at the arrogance of mankind in the following sense.
That is, we think that we can make significant parametric changes to the earth.
The earth is a massive body, not as massive as many other bodies, but it's massive.
And you know, for example, uh ask your environmentalist friend.
Suppose everybody on earth started jumping up and down.
Do you think that would throw the earth out of the orbit?
Or suppose everybody started blowing.
Uh do you think that we would uh uh go around the uh the sun a little bit faster?
I mean, there's I mean uh mankind is very is relatively insignificant to many, many other to other forces such as the wind, the sea, uh the uh the sun.
It ha he has a far smaller impact on the parameters of the of the earth than these other uh uh influences.
Let's go to um uh Dan in Grass Valley, California.
Welcome to the show, Dan.
Yes, thank you for taking my call.
Uh I have a problem with all of this, um, whether it's global warming or not.
Um I have children and uh my children's children are gonna have uh I I'm I'm worried about what we're leaving for 'em.
I have a son who's in the military who swam in the ocean in a harbor.
He just got water on his lips, and he was in the hospital for three weeks and almost died.
Um if you have a problem with cleaning up the environment, um, I think that the people that do have a problem with that should go live next door to a coal burning um plant.
Um wait, wait, wait a minute.
Wait a minute, wait a minute.
Uh look.
We can clean up the environment.
We can make it clean.
That that is, for example, tomorrow morning, if you make me the mayor of Los Angeles.
Los Angeles has smog.
Tomorrow morning, I could have uh clean air in Los Angeles.
If you gave me the power to, I can say make a law saying there shall be no more driving, no more factories operating, and no other uh sources of pollution.
How would you like that?
We could have we could have clean air, couldn't we?
But at a huge cost, couldn't we?
It would be a huge cost.
Yeah, it would be okay.
So the issue is the issue is not perfectly clean air or perfectly dirty air.
It is how much clean air are we gonna have at what price and are we willing to pay for it.
I think it's a quality of life we're talking about.
Of course it's a quality of life.
And um I uh I one more little thing.
I was in Chicago area, and we took the kids to a park, and there was acid rain into the river that was leaking down into the water.
Yeah.
It was coffee colored, and there was a sign on the beach that said, sorry, uh it's polluted, the water's polluted today.
We can't swim today.
Oh, that's a shame.
Well, you know what?
It's it's uh we need to clean up the air, you know.
I it's just it's a lot of people.
Well, the air the air now is much clean if you want to go to China and see how they're running amuck over there.
They have no controls, they have environmental quality.
Right, and and and more moreover, they're exempt from Kyoto.
But the one of the points is that the capitalist countries have the cleanest air.
I mean, the the the countries where they control the economy, Russia and uh and China matter of fact, I think it's some it's some uh river or lake in Russia where they have signs don't throw the uh your cigarettes in the in the river or the lake because uh you could cause a fire.
That's all I'm saying global warming or not, we need to clean up the environment.
Oh well, what do you mean by clean up the environment?
That is, we've gone a long way.
That is cars are far more fuel efficient than they've ever been.
You're I agree.
And we have cleaner air than there ever has been.
Well, you drive in any major city anywhere in the United States in the summertime, and there are signs out, uh sorry, today, you know, it's not a good day to be out, you should stay inside.
Can you can you deny that?
Well, no, I don't deny it, but but but it was worse a long time ago.
It was worse along look.
Clean air is a result of wealth.
It is a result of wealth.
That if you if you're rich like we are, you can afford to make those sacrifices and and and and and use those technological instruments that have cleaner air and cleaner water.
I mean, the see many people many people want us to uh you know, want government control over our economy.
And you look at the places where there's significant government control, China and Russia are good examples, and there's uh very very dirty dirty air.
And on the other hand, if you look at rich countries, there tends to be cleaner air.
And and the rich countries I would include is some of our socialist uh neighbors uh in in Europe.
Then they have cleaner air, and there's g uh there's government control, significant government control over their lives, but they're richer uh and they have cleaner air.
We'll be uh no no no no.
We can take one more call, right?
Okay, let's go to uh uh Tom in Lincoln, Nebraska.
Hi.
Welcome.
Thank you.
Um I just wanted to say that I concur with you on everything that you were saying earlier about the uh um global warming and and that it's not man's fault as much as a lot of people claim.
And uh I've got a uh quick little paragraph from one of my textbooks um that I have in my possession.
I'm a meteorology climatology student at the University of Nebraska Lincoln down here.
And anyways, I'd like to quickly read a paragraph from this textbook, and it says there's uh general warming of climate uh until the Atlantic climate stage, which was reached about eight thousand years ago,
lasting about three thousand years, had an average air temperature somewhat higher than those t of today when this uh textbook was published back in nineteen seventy-eight, and it said uh perhaps on the order of two point five degrees Celsius or four point five degrees Fahrenheit higher.
And uh they call that a climactic optimum.
Well that that that's consistent with uh uh what uh the climatologists that I know have said, uh uh guys like Fred Singer and and there's a fellow at the University of Virginia, uh that n uh I forget his name, but uh these are sensible climatologists and they uh question the uh the the standard rhetoric that we hear about global warming.
But the real tragedy for Americans is not who says what, it's one group of people backed by government who are trying to silence the dissenters, and that's what we should worry about.
We'll be back with the call for this.
Walter Williams here holding forth, and uh keep in mind uh ladies and gentlemen, uh Roger Hedcock will be in on Monday.
Uh and uh we hope that Rush has uh uh recovered and we wish him a speedy recovery, and he'll be back on Tuesday, we hope.
And uh let's uh go back to the phones and Pat in uh Pennsylvania.
Welcome to the show, Pat.
Uh, Dr. Williams.
Uh I called to say you're my hero, and uh I'd like to ask you how you get a wife to stay with you for so long when after you make her cut grass and shovel snow.
I I didn't have any uh luck with that.
Well, you know, you know, uh it's very interesting you bring that up, uh, because uh just before the show started, we have a couple of television uh uh screens here, and I was watching uh Fox News and uh and they uh were giving all kinds of suggestions about improving your marriage.
And you know what?
They didn't say anything about wives being obedient to their husbands.
And and that's the key thing, you know.
I got married under the old uh uh contract, you know, where it love, honor, and obey, and um and and all I have to do is cherish, and I just cherish it.
And my and my wife is uh uh uh very, very ob obedient.
Um and one of the r you see now th you may call this chauvinistic of me, but um uh something like sometimes I see wives talking w uh while their husband is talking.
And uh and I I told Mrs. Williams right off when we got married that she can't talk while I'm talking because that that's an insult.
That's like saying what I'm saying is not important.
And what when I'm s what I say is very, very important.
And then um uh there's something else I don't tolerate, and uh and that's um when uh when I scold Mrs. Williams, uh I I don't I don't tolerate you know looking me in the face while I'm scolding her, you know, the I call that reckless eyeballing.
And so, you know, uh she looks down, you know, when I when I'm uh scolding her.
But uh you guys would understand all this.
Um I'm a very handsome man and uh and very desirous of women.
And uh and those of you who don't have a website, you know, uh internet access to get my get to my website to see my photograph.
It's uh matter of fact, it's Walt E. Williams.com.
You can kind of picture me as a brown Tom Cruise.
That that's what you can kind of that's uh yeah, a lot taller.
But and and Mrs. Williams, uh we've been married for 47 uh years and uh we've known each other two years.
Uh we we're we're going on a half a century knowing one another.
Matter of fact, I was telling Ms. Williams uh the other day that uh she did much better in our marriage than I did.
I mean she came out a winter uh in our marriage.
So anyway, but uh y I think you have to do these kind of things to make sure that uh uh wives obey.
And and matter of fact, the minister that married uh uh uh those of you in Philadelphia, uh uh John Logan, he married us and he read uh uh St. Paul's letter to the Ephesians, and I think it's chapter twenty, verse five.
And it says, Wives be unto your husbands as your husband is unto Christ.
And so that's the relationship.
That's uh she has to treat me uh kind of like like I'm Chris.
And so uh so we get along uh uh very, very uh well.
But um anyway, that's enough for these tits uh uh tips because uh rush uh he doesn't pay me to give this kind of advice.
I I only get the minimum wage for for doing the show.
And so but I'm giving much more than the uh than than I'm being paid.
But uh let's go back.
Oh, there's another Pat from uh Vera Beach uh uh Florida.
Welcome to show.
Hey, Dr. Williams, I really appreciate your uh hosting the show.
I think you do a great job.
Okay.
Are you married?
Uh well I was until recently.
Oh okay.
Well you uh okay.
She didn't understand the proper relationship, apparently.
Yeah, right.
And and and it's probably your fault, too.
Well, in her mind, no, actually it was entirely her fault.
Okay.
But you didn't call the show talk about that.
Well, I uh you were talking to somebody earlier who seemed to be changing the subject from global warming to pollution, and I think you uh give them too much credit for being well informed.
I think it's been full court pressed by the media to misinform people and to make them equate carbon emissions with so cutting out of smokestacks.
These people think that global warming is associated with pollution in general.
Yeah.
Well, well and and it's intentional, just like the uh the use of phrases like global warming denier.
I mean, this isn't functional, it's a full court press going on in the media.
Uh this summer USA Today ran a series all week long about global warming, front page stories, plus the blurbs on each state.
Each single story was global warming related.
This is for a week.
I mean, this is not accidental.
Have have you heard them talk about global warming this week?
No, not too much.
They're being a bit quiet.
I wonder why that is.
Because it's global freezing, I guess.
But however, you know, a lot of folks don't remember that uh don't r uh recognize that CO2 is a food.
It's a food for what?
It's for plants.
That is plants use uh CO2 and their waste product is what?
Oxygen.
Oxygen, right.
And we need and we love oxygen.
We'll be back with your calls after this.
Okay, we're back uh for the last few minutes.
Uh by the way, uh when I was mentioning uh uh Fox that Fox uh news, uh I should have also mentioned that uh that there's the uh open of a new Fox TV show that features uh Rush as the President of the United States.
Uh you can check it out just by going to Rush Limbaugh.com and while you're there, sign up for the 24-7 and hear uh Rush's uh monologues, and you can also get your own anchor America's anchor man uh mouse pad, and that's at the rush limbaug.com.
And let's go to uh uh Sean in Ogden, Utah.
Welcome to show.
Hi, Dr. Williams, uh Ditto's.
Uh I know that Rush doesn't pay you to uh dispense advice.
You know what you've already stated that, but yeah I was kind of wondering.
I was hoping that the minimum wage would go up so he can pay me more.
There you go.
Uh I was just kind of wondering what you gave uh Mrs. Williams for Valentine's Day.
Well, um you're gonna be very disappointed.
Uh yeah, what what I did um uh I normally don't give uh uh out Valentine's uh day gifts uh because I don't believe in spoiling the help.
And uh but this year uh I did uh give her uh some uh very nice roses and um and she really enjoyed it.
It came quite as a surprise uh because during our 40 year seven years of marriage, uh I have not uh believe in doing things that would spoil the help.
Okay.
That's great.
Okay, thanks.
Let's take one more call.
Bob and Clovis uh New Mexico, welcome to the show.
Hi, Dr. Williams.
It's an honor to speak to you.
Hey, I was wondering if you'd heard uh you know, we have a large Hispanic population out here in New Mexico.
I was wondering if uh our urinals were gonna be bilingual.
Well, no, well, what what you have to do, uh you have to let me know that because I'm not going out to uh uh New Mexico to find uh whether that is.
But but maybe it's uh it's something like, you know, uh uh push uh push one if you if it's English and uh and push two if it's uh Spanish.
Uh we we hear of all that kind of stuff.
So I I don't know.
I would hope that they're bilingual.
And if my uh fellow uh Mexican Americans uh find that they're not bilingual, they should just bring suit and uh or maybe actually go to the company and translate.
You know, give them a free translation so that they can be uh uh bilingual.
Uh so uh but anyway, I am not going out there to do the research.
▲
Export Selection