A little graphic up there under Barack Obama, who, by the way, called Republicans racists in New Hampshire yesterday, will have that audio sound bite.
Has had a graphic up there, Obama suspicious of the hype.
Really?
Well, then so am I.
We all ought to be suspicious of this hype.
Greetings, welcome back.
El Rushball, meeting and surpassing all audience expectations on a daily basis.
The telephone number here, 800-282-2882.
If you want to be on the program, Experts Ponder Bird Flu's disappearance.
Earlier this year, bird flu panic was in full swing.
The French feared for their foie gras.
The Swiss locked their chickens indoors, and Americans enlisted prison inmates in Alaska to help spot infected wild birds.
The bird flu, previously confirmed to Southeast Asia, was striking birds in places as diverse as Germany, Egypt, and Nigeria.
A flu pandemic seemed inevitable.
Then the virus went quiet.
Except for a steady stream of human cases in Indonesia, the current flu epicenter, the past year's worries about a catastrophic global outbreak largely disappeared.
What happened?
Many of us are holding our breath to see what happens in the winter, said Dr. Malik Paris, microbiology professor at Hong Kong U. Bird flu spread very rapidly last year, so the question is, was that a one-off incident?
While the pandemic has not materialized, experts, of course, warn it's too early to relax.
We need to start looking harder for where the virus is hiding.
Maybe it's not hiding, you idiots.
Maybe it just never was the pandemic that you predicted it to be.
another scare tactic that was designed to cause chaos and panic and fear all over the world as people ran around get bird flu vaccinations.
Remember, and I suspect that big pharma was behind this because there was this, what was it, thermoflu?
Tamaflu.
Everybody out there, there was a run on this Tamaflu stuff couldn't get it.
There were shortages, people gearing up for bird flu.
It's just, it's classic.
It is a classic how the drive-by media and the consensus science community work together to keep everybody thinking that their lives will end tomorrow.
Tony Blair, this is a story from the UK Telegraph.
Tony Blair formally declared Britain's multicultural experiment over yesterday.
As he told immigrants they had a duty to integrate with the mainstream of society.
In a speech that overturned more than three decades of Labor Party support for the idea of multiculturalism, he set out a series of requirements that were now expected from ethnic minority groups if they wished to call themselves British.
These included equality of respect, especially better treatment of women by Muslim men, allegiance to the rule of law, and a command of the English language.
If outsiders wishing to settle in Britain were not prepared to conform to the virtues of tolerance, then they should stay away.
He added, conform to it or don't come here.
We don't want the hate mongers, whatever their race, religion, or creed.
Mr. Blair speaking in Downing Street said the diversity of cultures in Britain should still be celebrated, but the tone of his speech was against the ideology that became known as multiculturalism.
You think we'll ever hear that here?
Can you imagine President Bush saying this?
Can you imagine President Barack Hussein Obama saying this?
Can you imagine Hillary Rodham Clinton saying this?
Can you imagine John Kerry saying this?
Can you imagine Al Gore saying this?
Can you imagine Senator McCain saying this?
Can you imagine Mitt Romney saying this?
Can you imagine Rudy Giuliani saying this?
Can you imagine any president or presidential candidate saying what Tony Blair said?
Maybe Kerry, if he thought it would get him a few votes.
He would flip-flop later after the storm that he created hit the full force.
When it comes to our essential values, this is Tony Blair, when it comes to our essential values, the belief in democracy, the rule of law, tolerance, equal treatment for all, respect for this country and its shared heritage, then that is where we come together.
It is what gives us what we hold in common.
It is what gives us the right to call ourselves British.
Imagine an American leader saying that same thing by concluding it is what gives us the right to call ourselves American.
Can you imagine the cat calls?
What Tony Blair is fighting in Great Britain and what we are fighting in America.
Years and years of liberals telling us that America and Britain are bad, that we should feel ashamed to be a part of a country that has such a disgusting history of abuse, intolerance, racism, discrimination, homophobia, bigotry, sexism, environmental destruction.
This is what our kids are taught in school.
This, well, I don't have any.
Your kids are taught in school.
America is evil.
America is the source of problems in the world.
In America, the mantra goes like this.
We are evil in our treatment of Indians, in our treatment of blacks, in our treatment of poor people.
We are mere cowboys.
We have too much power.
Our military is too strong.
We drop bombs.
We use too many of the world's resources.
We do not give or help others enough.
The list is endless, you people.
But people saying that part of the multicultural-ism curricula have been successful.
And so we have to fight this multicultural crap in order to hang on to our very existence.
Tony Blair, very eloquent in this.
It's interesting to note he says this not far from the day he leaves office.
He doesn't say this when he comes into office.
He is on his way out.
It's sort of a shame that sort of like candidates.
You know, after they lose an election, that's when you hear what they're really like.
In their speech where they accept their defeat, concession speech.
Don't we all say, well, where was that during the campaign?
Where was that?
Instead of all this canned BS.
But multiculturalism and the diluting of the distinct British culture, the diluting of the distinct American culture is precisely the objective of the socialists and liberals in this country and around the world.
We have to simply be cut down to size.
We're too big.
We're too evil.
We're too mean.
And since the rest of the world can't prosper as we do, we must not be allowed to prosper at all.
We must all be equally miserable.
Cynthia McKinney has introduced a bill to impeach President Bush, likely her final legislative act in Congress.
The legislation has no chance of passing.
It serves as a symbolic parting shot, not only at Bush, but also at Democratic leaders.
Nancy Pelosi has made clear she will not entertain these proposals.
McKinney, of course, is just a nutcase anyway.
She's a glittering jewel of colossal ignorance, and we will miss her for her colorfulness and hair, outrageous speech, beating up cops with cell phones and so forth.
We're going to miss all of that.
This, of course, you may not remember this about Cynthia McKinney.
Every State of the Union address, Cynthia McKinney would be the first to arrive to stake out a seat on the aisle so that she could be photographed with the arriving and departing President Bush because such photo ops looked good to her constituency.
And now her final act is to introduce this meaningless piece of legislation to begin the impeachment process.
Quick timeout, folks.
Got to go back with more right after this.
Okay, back to the phones we go on the Rush Limbaugh program.
A thrill, ladies and gentlemen, to be with you.
This is Amy in Rochester, New York.
Hello, Amy.
The thrill is all mine.
I can't believe this.
Merry Christmas to me and Merry Christmas to you.
Thank you.
Thanks very much.
I love people that are not afraid to wish themselves good fortune.
Well, God's blessings, actually.
Anyway, you stole my thunder reading that quote from Barack, or you didn't really read it, alluded to it, but I was driving on the expressway and heard that on my 1 o'clock news and had to pull over in anger and start dialing you because I don't like being called a racist when I am far from it.
Well, let's listen to what Barack Hussein Obama said while in New Hampshire.
An unidentified reporter said to Barack Hussein Obama, is America ready for a black president?
Are there some voters who would not vote for African-American candidate because of race?
I'm sure there are.
Although those are the same voters who probably wouldn't vote for me because of my politics.
Well, obviously, that'd be Republicans.
By the way, sorry, you are not African American, Mr. Obama.
You do not share the heritage of this country that African American implies you are half white.
Of course, that doesn't matter.
You can choose what you want to be.
You can choose to be black, choose to be white if you have half white, half white.
Choose what you want.
He's chosen his side and he's going to try to exploit it all he can.
He's basically saying there that, yep, there's some people who wouldn't vote for an African-American candidate because of race.
Same people wouldn't vote for me because of my politics.
How can you interpret that as anything other than Republicans are racist?
I ask you.
No, you can't.
You can't.
But here's the thing.
And this is where this is just, it's gone downhill way fast, and it's, I don't know if this is salvageable.
He's calling Republicans racist, the same people that nominated and voted for Michael Steele, the same people that nominated and voted for Lynn Swan, the same people that nominated and voted for Ken Blackwell in Ohio, the same people who made Colin Powell and Condoleezza Rice Secretary of State Republicans.
These are the people that aren't going to vote for Barack Obama because he is an African American.
I'm going to tell you, this hype, this whatever you would call this, this secondcoming type treatment that he is getting, it defies logic.
It defies anything that accompanies achievement.
Normally, see, I'm from the old school, and I know this doesn't apply anymore.
I mean, Paris Hilton is the definition of why I'm wrong.
I used to think that celebrity fame, whatever, notoriety came from achievement.
Something about you that was special, something about you had done something to excel.
And we now know that that's not true.
You can be a celebrity because you're a celebrity.
Barack Obama is what he is because the media and some people have a desire that a certain kind of figure be present in the political race, so they're going to go make one.
And the figure they're making him out to be is not who he is.
He's not some great third waiver.
He's not some above-the-fray guy.
He's not take a little from here and take a little from there, and we can all get along.
He's a liberal.
Look at his voting record.
He is a liberal Democrat, make no mistake about it, who's got a smooth tongue.
He can talk smoothly, and for some reason, there's this aura of I don't know.
I don't know how to describe it.
But it is when you hear him say things like this, that's when he has slipped.
Of course, the drive-by media is not going to make a big deal out of this.
It takes people listening to it, being able to read the stitches on a fastball, read between the lines.
I have a solution for Obama because I'll tell you, you've seen the stories.
Why?
Larger crowds in New Hampshire than even Bill Clinton ever attracted.
Well, let's not forget when Bill Clinton went to New Hampshire.
He was almost out of the race for crying out loud.
He had all these controversies swirling around him.
He didn't go into New Hampshire with this kind of hype.
Nobody has.
But everybody, oh, we're hearing the stories.
I just wanted to touch him.
I've never seen a room light up like this so much.
Everybody wanted to touch him.
Everybody wanted to be in his presence.
Everyone who touches Obama, everyone who hears Obama, everyone who sees Obama.
Why, ladies and gentlemen, they are healed.
They're no longer mean.
They're no longer extremists.
They're not racist, sexist, bigots, homophobes.
Why?
They love humanity.
They love all.
They feel so good about themselves.
They've never had such an inner glow of warmth, contentment, and happiness because Obama fills them with peace.
Obama fills them with hope.
Obama fills them with love and joy.
Obama is not the man from hope.
We've been there, done that.
He is the man of hope, ladies and gentlemen, Barack Obama.
Well, I want to put this to the test.
Put him on the first plane to Baghdad.
Have him walk the streets of Anbar province.
Set up a little meeting here to show how we can all get along with Moktara Al-Sadr.
Have him venture outside the green zone.
And then when he finishes there, let's send him to Tehran.
When he finishes there, let's send him into Damascus.
And when he's finished there, we'll send him to meet with the Hamas guys.
We'll send him into Lebanon to meet with the Hezbo's.
And we'll send him to meet with the Palestinians.
And when he's finished there, he goes on up to Riyadh and meet with the Saudi royal family.
And after, by sheer, his sheer presence for a weekend in all of these places, our world problems there are solved.
Then send him to Darfur.
Send him to Darfur in Sudan and stop the militant Islamist genocide of the natives in Sudan.
Obama can do it all.
Send him to Somalia.
Ladies and gentlemen, send Barack Hussein Obama everywhere there is a problem.
Send him to Philadelphia.
Well, the murder rate there is unfortunately high.
Send Barack Obama to New Orleans.
Lots of problems there.
Send Barack Obama to the Mexico border on California, Arizona, Texas, and solve the problem simply by his presence, simply by virtue of the power of his personality and his aura, Barack Obama, single-handedly as the man of hope.
Why, look at how these people in New Hampshire reacted today.
I'll bet there's not one angry person in New Hampshire.
I'll bet there's no partisanship in New Hampshire.
I'll bet there's nothing but love and joy and hope for a better life for all peoples of the planet now and forevermore.
I would even suspect that the homeless have gotten adrift of the aura surrounding Barack Hussein Obama, and even they are feeling uplifted and on the cusp of salvation, all because Barack Hussein Obama set foot in New Hampshire.
Well, my gosh, folks, if it can work there, it could work in Baghdad.
It could work with Muki el-Sadr.
It could work in Riyadh.
It could work in Tehran.
It could work in Damascus.
It could work in Lebanon.
It could work.
Send him to Jerusalem, ladies and gentlemen.
Solve the Israeli-Palestinian problem once and for all, Barack Hussein Obama.
All he has to do is make a speech, show up, let himself be touched and mauled and mobbed by people hungry and thirsty for real hope, real leadership, and real love and real phoniness.
I mean, phoniness sells.
Matthew in Charlotte, North Carolina, welcome to the EIB Network.
Hi.
Good afternoon, Rush.
Hey.
I guess I'm kind of curious, if you don't feel as though the Iraqi report is a good idea or is not an intelligent idea, then what would be your solution for the problem in Iraq?
Because it's obvious that George Bush has made it clear that Rumsfeld being taken care of and being relieved of his duties was trying to micromanage the war.
Then what is your solution to the problems in Iraq?
My solution to the problems that if you're going to do an Iraq study group, go out and find some generals, go out and find some genuine military people who have experience and put together a document on how to win, Matthew, not on how to bring the country together, united behind the notion of surrender.
Okay, I agree with that.
I mean, I just wanted to make clear that if the study isn't correct, which I don't think it may not be the solution to the problem either, it was clear that the generals were trying to run the war and Rumsfeld would not let them run the war.
And I agree with you that if you want an opinion on how to solve the war, then speak with the generals.
Yeah, but although I don't know that it's clear that Rumsfeld wasn't listening to generals, you get two sides of that.
At any rate, if I'm going to convene a group and I'm president, I don't convene a group.
I get the generals, I get my people experts, and I go win it.
Pure and simple.
Having more fun than a human being should be allowed to have Rush Limbaugh.
Half my brain tied behind my back just to make it fair.
So I'm reading the New York Times over the weekend, and I am the lead and closing item of the story on the rift in the Republican Party and on the right over the Iraq Surrender Group's report.
Rush Limbaugh called it stupid.
Rush Limbaugh is quoted all over the place.
And the implication of the story was that the only people who have any problem with this are the Republicans.
Not so, ladies and gentlemen from Al-Ap, Democrats are not scrambling to endorse recommendations of the bipartisan Iraq surrender group, a tactic that largely leaves President Bush alone to salvage the wall.
Instead, the party that'll control Congress in January plans to focus on stepped up oversight of Bush's plans for the war.
Carl Levin will take over the Armed Services Committee.
He says he's going to hold three hearings on Bush's plans for Iraq and is prepared to subpoena documents to review past missteps.
Democrats also eyeing ways to attach conditions to war funds that won't hurt the troops and may even attract Republican support.
So they're not getting behind it either.
You see, folks, they don't want to solve this.
They want this continue to be an issue they can beat Bush up over and the Republicans.
And speaking, they don't want to harm the troops.
How many times have we all heard, I support the troops, but not the wall?
Syracuse New York radio station has reported that Lauren, and I don't know how you, how would you pronounce this, M-A-G-G-I, Magai, Maggie, Majoy, who knows?
Lauren Magui, 35, was charged with harassment for spitting in a soldier's face at Hancock Airport.
The incident happened on the Thanksgiving holiday or over the Thanksgiving holiday.
35-year-old Lauren Magui approached a soldier from the 10th Mountain Division who apparently was not in uniform and asked if he was a soldier.
When he said yes, she spit in his face.
Somebody tell me again how the left supports the troops, but not their mission.
More details.
Jason Jones, 21, told a police that a woman he didn't know walked up to him near the United Airlines ticket counter, asked him if he was a Fort Drum soldier, and when he responded that he was, spat in his face.
Police searched the airport garage and located a woman fitting the description that Jones provided, was later identified as 35-year-old Lauren Magui, or Maggie.
I wish I knew how to pronounce this name.
Police escorted her into the terminal where Jones identified her as the woman who had spit on him.
What if she had bird flu?
What if she had polonium-210?
It's a liberal.
You never know.
A second soldier on the scene supported the accusation of Jason Jones.
35-year-old Lauren Magui offered no explanation for her conduct.
She could not be reached for comment on Thursday night.
They support the troops.
Hi, are you a Fort Drum soldier?
Yes, ma'am.
Are you in the 10th Mountain Division?
Yes, ma'am.
I support the troops, but I hate you and your mission and your president.
How about this new chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, Silvestre Reyes?
Reyes, that's right.
I keep mispronouncing it.
It's Reyes.
It's R-A-R-E-Y-E-S.
Three and a half years, hundreds of suicide bombings in Iraq, and the incoming chairman of the House Intelligence Committee doesn't know who the perps are.
He passed or failed a test on Iraq and al-Qaeda.
He is facing unpleasant surprises about the enemy, this time as the incoming chairman of the House Intelligence Committee.
Like a number of his colleagues, Reyes cannot answer some fundamental questions about the powerful forces arrayed against us in the Middle East.
To his credit, Reyes is a kindly, thoughtful man who also sits on the Armed Services Committee.
He does see the undertows drawing the region into chaos.
But whoever wrote this, it's public CQ.
I don't know if it's Congressional Quarterly or if it's a blog or what.
I thought it only right now to pose the same questions to a Democrat, especially one who will take charge of the intelligence panel come January.
The former Border Patrol agent also sits in the Armed Services Committee.
Reyes stumbled when I asked him a simple question about al-Qaeda at the end of a 40-minute interview in his orifice last week.
Members of the intelligence committee, mind, you were paid $165,000 a year to know more than basic facts about our foes in the Middle East.
The dialogue went like this.
Al-Qaeda is what, I asked, Sunni or Shia?
Al-Qaeda, they have both, Reyes said.
You're talking about predominantly?
Sure, I said, not knowing what else to say.
Predominantly, probably Shiite.
He couldn't have been more wrong.
Al-Qaeda is profoundly Sunni.
If a Shiite showed up at an Al-Qaeda clubhouse, they'd slice off his head and use it for a soccer ball.
That's because the extremist Sunnis who make up Al-Qaeda consider all Shiites to be heretics.
Al-Qaeda's Sunni roots account for its very existence.
Bin Laden and his followers believe that the Saudi royal family besmirched the true faith through their corruption and alliance with the U.S., particularly allowing U.S. troops on Saudi soil.
I asked Silvestre Reyes, Hezbollah, who are they?
Answer, Hezbollah.
Hezbollah.
He laughed, shifting in his seat.
Why do you ask me these questions at 5 o'clock?
Can I answer in Spanish?
Do you speak Spanish?
Postito, I said, a little.
Go ahead.
Well, I apologize for putting him on the spot a little, but I reminded him that the people who have killed thousands of Americans on U.S. soil and in the Middle East have been front-page news for a long time now.
It's been 23 years since a Hezbollah suicide bomber killed over 200 U.S. military personnel in Beirut, mostly Marines.
Hezbollah, a creature of Iran, closely is close to taking over in Lebanon.
Reports say that they're helping train Iraqi Shiites to kill Sunnis in the spiraling civil war.
Yeah, Reyes said, but it's not like the Hatfield and McCoy's.
It's a heck of a lot more complex.
Anyway, this goes on.
He doesn't know about Hezbollah and who they are.
He didn't know the primary construction behind al-Qaeda.
And he's going to be chairman of the House Intelligence Committee.
Quick.
You're scared of it.
That scares you, Mr. Snerdley?
Why does this scare you?
You can only be scared upon learning this if you also think the Democrats are serious about dealing with this enemy.
It doesn't matter who this enemy is.
That's not the enemy they're concerned with.
You think the Democrats are concerned about Al-Qaeda and Hezbollah?
Do you think liberal Democrats give a wit?
They're concerned about Bush.
Liberal Democrats think the focus of evil in this country is the Patriot Act.
They think the focus of evil in this country is our military.
They think the focus of evil in this country is the so-called domestic spying program, which is nothing more than foreign surveillance.
Do you think that the House Intelligence Committee or John Conyers or Dingell or Henry Waxman are going to investigate anything other than the Bush administration?
Reyes is charged with our national security, and who does he think threatens it?
By definite, if he doesn't know who comprises Al-Qaeda, how seriously a threat do you think he takes them?
Now, I want to move on here.
I've said what I've said about it.
Everybody knows I'm right.
There's no reason to continue with this.
Four-year-old accused of improperly touching a teacher.
This is a story from Belmead, Texas.
Now, what do you think when you hear that headline?
Four-year-old accused of improperly touching a teacher.
That I would like to see.
I mean, I would love to see what this looks like.
Let's share details of the story, shall we?
A four-year-old hugged his teacher's aide and was put into in-school suspension, according to the father.
But La Vegas school administrators have a different story.
Demarcus Blackwell's four-year-old son was lining up to get on the bus after scruple last month when he was accused of rubbing his face in the chest of a female employee.
The principal of La Vega Primary School sent a letter to the Blackwells that said the pre-kindergartner demonstrated inappropriate physical behavior interpreted as sexual contact and/or sexual harassment.
Blackwell says that's ridiculous.
The aide would misread a hug from a four-year-old.
Blackwell wrote to administrators demanding the whole incident be expunged from his son's academic file because his son's too young to know what it means to act sexually.
David Davis, executive director of the Advocacy Center in Waco, Texas, tends to agree with Blackwell.
Tends to.
This is a matter of debate.
He says, assuming the boy has not had sexual encounters or been appropriately exposed to pornography, most four-year-olds are sexually innocent.
Not for long.
Public school keeps up.
What is a four-year-a primary school?
What's a primary school?
What's a four-year-old doing in a primary?
I thought that's barely kindergarten, right?
Oh, most of the public schools offer pre-K?
Okay, that makes my point even better.
They're trying to take over the education Nazis have been trying and succeeding for years to get kids under their control earlier and earlier.
Now, four-year-olds are going to pre-K in public schools.
Four-year-old needs to be at home all day with his mommy.
Let her charge sexual harassment.
Well, I know that's an unfair assumption.
I'm sorry.
Ladies, forgive me.
That assumes the mommy is home.
That assumes the mommy's not out working at Walmart to barely eke out a living.
Yeah, got to get my mind right on this.
I'm an old-fashioned fuddy duddy.
Mommy's at home.
Four-year-olds.
Forgive me, ladies and gentlemen.
Still, yet another example of, you know, these education people pulling kids away, and then when there's the least little problem, throw the kids out and say, hey, this is not our, there's something else to this.
Who must you be?
And what must be in your mind?
What kind of pervert must you be or militant feminists must you be when a four-year-old rubs his head on your chest and you think sexual harassment?
What must be in your mind?
What must be in your head?
Where have you been to be so sensitized to the brutish and predatory behavior of men that a four-year-old rubbing his head on your chest is capable of sexually harassing you?
What kind of woman must this be?
Probably a virgin.
You know, I just heard this, this woman who's charging sexual harassment against a four-year-old.
She's a teacher's assistant.
She's got to be just out of college, right?
Not necessarily.
Well, if she is just out of college, it's no wonder why she's running around thinking every man's a predator, even a four-year-old.
Patently ridiculous.
Here's Francis in Palm Beach, Florida.
Hi, Francis.
I'm glad you waited.
Welcome to the broadcast.
Thank you very much, Russ.
It's really great to talk to a really good man.
Thank you.
There's too many around.
My husband is one, though, I will tell you that.
Oh, I'm glad to be in such small company.
What I wanted to go back to initially is the overall world threat that Iraq poses.
It really leaves us no alternative but to win there.
I know I'm preaching to the choir when I'm talking to you about that, but I think the listeners have to go about looking at what's going on from a different perspective.
I think they all have a narrow vision of what's going on there.
They're not putting Iraq into the context of that part of the world and what's really happened.
I think they're in denial.
I think more people than you'd really want to know or realize don't want to think of Iraq in any context other than something that's over there that's a mistake.
And it makes them uncomfortable to have to watch reports from it every night on the news and don't want to see it anymore and just get rid of it and make it go away.
I think you're exactly right.
And I'll tell you, what's been going on and listening to you, I've started to go back and read history more than I did when I was a student.
I was more into the sciences, you know, graduate degrees in chemistry, and history wasn't that appealing to me.
You know, it was dead and gone.
And now, looking at what's going on in the world, I've been going back and reading.
And I suggest to people, if they can't sit and pick up a history book, take some of the literature that's been written, which as a byproduct describes some of what's been going on.
An example is the Hajj, which was, what, 20 years ago or something?
Beyond Euras.
Right.
It gives you some light on what goes on in the Arab world, what the mindset is there.
And take a look at some of the things that have really been happening.
Yeah, but you know, even at that, if people did that, the people we're talking about, still it's over there.
They don't want to face the reality that there are people around the world who do not like us because of our lifestyle, the way we live, and the exceptionalism of our country and want to cut us down to size.
They just don't want to deal with it.
And they don't have to because lives are pretty prosperous and affluent, and there's a lot of free time on people's hands, and they'd rather not deal with this.
You're absolutely right.
I mean, that's why it's going to take a couple more attacks, Francis.
It's going to take a lot more Americans dying.
This is, you know, Pearl Harbor was what it was, but 9-11 apparently was not another Pearl Harbor for enough people.
No, there weren't enough people that were directly affected.
You know, you take a look, even at little circumstances, in New York and not just the Harlem area, but New York in general, New York City, the amount of murders is horrendous.
I mean, it was reduced by Giuliani, but still, you have an enormous number of black-on-black murders, and you don't hear any of those guys going out and protesting.
The Jackson or the, oh, I can't think of his name.
You would be discussing the Reverend Sharpton.
But, you know, it's the New Yorkers care when they got slighted on the Homeland Security budget.
They raised hell when the Washington Homeland Security Department wasn't going to send them as much money as, and they hadn't spent all they had gotten up to that point.
Well, they had a cow.
A little global warming wing go there.
They had a cow, they blew up.
I don't know.
New Yorkers are never going to forget it, but whether they put it in the proper context as liberals is another thing.
Their blind hatred for George W. Bush stands in the way of them seeing the real enemy.
They've created this domestic enemy, and the real war on terror is being fought in this country.
I would almost say we have a civil war in this country going on.
Not armed.
We have an ideological civil war going on, and it's not healthy.
Heart attack grill.
Well, I'm not going to have time for this, but there's a place in Tempe, Arizona called the Heart Attack Grill, and they serve things like a quadruple bypass burger and flatliner fries.
And their waitresses are dressed up in really scant and skimpy nurse uniforms.
And so a nurse association out there is just offended as hell, thinking of filing a lawsuit against the quadruple bypass, the heart attack grill, because they're offended.
This is exactly what I'm talking about.
People are so self-focused and waiting to be offended about things.
They're looking at the wrong people and seeing enemies.
Anyway, they just wound too tight.
We'll be back.
Stay with us, my friends.
I don't mean to leave you hanging, folks.
We'll have all the details on the Arizona waitresses dressing as naughty nurses causing all kinds of problems out there at the Heart Attack Grill.