All Episodes
Previous Next
Oct. 17, 2006 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:21
October 17, 2006, Tuesday, Hour #3
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
And greetings, thrill seekers, music lovers, conversationalists, all across the fruited plain.
Three weeks to go until the election.
It says three weeks from today.
A lot can happen out there.
And we're doing our best to make it happen here on the EIB network.
I am Rush Limbaugh, America's real anchorman.
The nation's most listened to radio talk show for countless substantive reasons.
800-282-2882 is the number.
If you want to be on the program, the email address, rush at EIBNet.com.
Do you remember not too long ago, Arnold Schwarzenegger called a politico out in California, Bonnie Garcia, a very hot Latina, had a very hot Latina temperament, a comment for which Governor Schwarzenegger later apologized.
Now, Bonnie Garcia is, she's a Republican from Cathedral City in California, is Puerto Rican, was quick to defend the governor, and he supported her campaign.
Well, she's back in the news today.
She sort of returned the favor.
Bonnie Garcia caused a political ruckus when she told a classroom of La Quinta high school seniors that she wouldn't kick Governor Schwarzenegger out of bed.
She is 44 years old, made the remark October 10th while she was speaking to an economics class shortly before she was scheduled to appear before the Scruel's Young Republican club.
So Schwarzenegger has to apologize.
And now she's apologized for what she said about him.
She wouldn't kick him to a bunch of high school students.
By the way, speaking of, Sterdley had a perplexed and shocked look on his face moments ago when I said that there are 200 reported cases of teacher abuse of students in North Carolina.
Bottom line is this, the Raleigh News and Observer, during the past five years, more than 200 teachers, coaches, or scruel administrators in North Carolina have been charged with sexually abusing their students.
So far this scruel year, 28 cases of sexual behavior between teachers and students have been reported to the State Department of Public Instruction.
And according to Harry Wilson, an attorney for the state scruple board, throughout most of the 90s, there were fewer than 20 such cases a year.
Now, of course, the obvious response to this is, folks, that it's unfair to tar an entire scruel or scruel system or administration or the teaching profession, blah, because of 200 bad eggs in one state, such as North Carolina.
And of course, remember that everybody's own scruel and scruel system is good, unlike everybody else's.
But this is just one of the little tidbits of information.
This kind of thing is on the rise.
And we know, Ladies and gentlemen, who is running the public school system in this country?
We know who's running it.
Now, this next story, I just have countless question marks.
This is a Philadelphia inquirer story.
FBI raids four homes and two offices in the Kurt Weldon probe three and a half weeks before the election.
Weldon says he only found out about this investigation three and a half weeks ago when it's been going on, or recently, found yesterday or today, this week, when it supposedly been going on for two and a half years.
This is an investigation of Weldon's daughter, who has allegedly been funneled business from her father, Kurt Weldon.
Something tells me that he got a little too close to Abel Danger or with Abel Danger, what was really going on.
And intelligence and law enforcement are fighting back.
This is six raids, folks.
The Bush Justice Department, Bush, the George W. Bush Justice Department, is investigating Weldon three weeks before an election.
Now, what the hell is going on?
Meanwhile, William Jefferson, Democrat Louisiana, was investigated.
They taped him taking a payoff.
They later found $90,000 in his freezer.
He is still walking around and running for office.
It's almost like Republicans have a death wish out there.
I mean, I am stunned that this is happening.
And what about Harry Reid?
Just because he's amending his documents doesn't mean the issue should just go away.
But of course, Harry Reid hadn't even made it to page one yet in the Washington Post or the New York Times.
About noon, well, see, this is, I think, from yesterday.
At noon yesterday, a group of 17 protesters arrived outside Kurt Weldon's district office in Upper Darby, Pennsylvania.
This is all coordinated.
And this is from the group crew, the committee for responsibility and ethics in Washington.
Of course, this group hasn't had anything to say about Dingy Harry.
Now, let's move on to Senator Hillary Clinton.
She called John McCain yesterday, personally, a couple days ago, to personally apologize and denounce comments that an advisor of hers reportedly made slamming the Republican senator over his time in captivity in Vietnam.
Now, the reason she called McCain was because of a column in the New York Times by Maureen Dowd, who quoted an anonymous advisor talking about McCain's criticism of the Clintons over their North Korea position.
The advisor said that Team Clinton thought McCain was doing the White House's dirty work by criticizing the Clintons and ended up looking similar to the way he did on those captive tapes from Hanoi, where he recited the names of his crewmates.
Now, that was a reference to an unsubstantiated rumor used to tar McCain as off-kilter during the 2000 Republican presidential primary.
Aides to both senators said that Clinton reached out to McCain to denounce the comment and apologize.
And everybody wants to know who the aide was.
And the Clinton people are not admitting who the aide was.
They're not telling us who the aide was.
So people are speculating.
Well, how did this happen?
How did Maureen Dowd happen to end up with this staffer?
Who can it be?
And under what circumstances?
Maureen Dowd clearly knows.
She quoted anonymously the staffer.
So, and by the way, this is just too much.
I will never forget when Hillary Clinton, way back in the 90s, I forget the exact year, said that she was named after Sir Edmund Hillary.
And of course, the Drive My Media swooned and everybody swooned.
We pointed out on this program, Sir Edmund Hillary climbed Mount Everest in 1947, or 1953, rather.
Mrs. Clinton was born in 1947.
Nobody ever heard of Edmund Hillary for her to be named after him until six years after she was born.
So, for more than a decade, one piece of her informal biography has been that she was named for Sir Edmund Hillary, the conqueror of Mount Everest.
The story was even recounted in Bill Clinton's autobiography, My Lie.
He even put it in.
This is just unreal.
Yesterday, Mrs. Clinton's campaign said she was not named for Sir Edmund Hillary after all.
She blames her mother.
It was a sweet family story her mother shared to inspire greatness in her daughter to get results, Jennifer Hanley, a spokesman for the campaign, said.
So in May of 1953, Edmund Hillary and his guide, Tenzing Norge, became the first men to reach the summit of Mount Everest in 1995, shortly after meeting Sir Edmund.
Mrs. Clinton said that her mother, Dorothy Rodham, had long told her she was named for him.
It had two L's, which is how she thought she was supposed to spell Hillary, Mrs. Clinton said at the time, after meeting Sir Edmund.
So when I was born, she called me Hillary.
And she always told me it's because of Sir Edmund Hillary.
This is, first off, blame it on mom.
Blame it on mom, and then alter the story.
Oh, yeah, my mother told me this to inspire greatness in me.
It ends up in Clinton's autobiography.
And for some reason, now they feel the need to correct the record.
Well, this is one lie they're fixing.
How about the other thousand or two thousand?
It's a start, and there are a few days before 2008 to address some of the others.
Also, New York Daily News today, their daily politics blog, notes that Mrs. Clinton lately has been wearing a cross on a chain around her neck, a diamond cross.
She wore a gold one on July 20th for a speech criticizing advertising directed at children.
No picture available for that when she wore the diamond-studded one pictured above to her meeting with the New York Daily News last week.
A Google images search doesn't seem to turn up any others, though whenever you think you've noticed something new about Clinton, her age usually produce rock-solid evidence that it's always been thus.
So Hillary's out after the Christian vote, subtly wearing these little cross pendants around her gorgeous neck.
Well, I think, I don't know that she's crucified to be other than McCain.
Her aide crucified McCain lately.
But I mean, this is insurance for further crucifications of political opponents.
North Korea said Tuesday that these UN sanctions aimed at punishing the country are a declaration of war.
We come back.
I'm going to tell you what these sanctions, folks.
Declaration of war, my back in just a second.
Okay, so the North Koreans said today that these really, really stiff UN sanctions aimed at punishing North Korea for its nuclear test are a declaration of war.
And they are, they're not admitting this, but signs are they're readying a second test.
We've had sanctions on the North Korean since the 50s, folks.
I just love, let me just say, as sanctions go, the ones imposed on North Korea by the Security Council last Saturday.
I mean, these are tough sanctions, folks.
Listen to this.
I mean, it wasn't even close, but it was unanimous, a 15-to-0 vote.
Everybody got on board the CHICOMs, the Russians.
I mean, it was diplomacy.
This is tough stuff from this day forward.
The sale or transfer of materials that the North Koreans could use to build a nuke are not allowed.
From this day forward, materials that the North Koreans could use to build biological or chemical weapons or ballistic missiles are not allowed.
The resolution says so.
From this day forward, North Koreans associated with weapons programs will not be allowed to travel internationally, and their overseas assets will be frozen.
And the cherry on top of all this is that cargo going in and out of North Korea is going to be inspected.
This is tough stuff.
Maybe our port security, maybe they could inspect our cargo, too.
At any rate, with sanctions like this, who would want to live?
If I were Kim Jong-il, man, it'd be suicide.
How am I going to get my corvoisier?
He must be asking himself.
Or how's he going to get his triple X porn-rated videos in or videos?
So North Korea, the Axis of Evil's third leg, has been neutered.
The UN did this with one resolution.
North Korea isn't now just a starving, isolated rogue nation.
I mean, now they are really, really isolated.
The diplomats at the UN have really punished them.
So much so that they are considering this a declaration of war.
Now, how did we get these tough sanctions, folks?
What changed?
How did we get the THICOMs and the Russians on board here?
Well, just a teency weinty little clause added.
That clause forbids the threat of military action to enforce the sanctions.
So if the North Koreans break them, they're going to get another letter.
We are going to paper these people into submission like you can't believe.
If they want to ignore these super tough UN sanctions, or if they want to tell the world to kiss their rear end, then they're going to get a letter.
They're going to get, and the letter may be in all caps, just to show how angry the UN is.
In fact, they might even get more resolutions in addition to more letters.
I mean, I think Kim Jong-il finally got what's coming to him.
He got sanctions and diplomacy.
I mean, this stuff is just fabulous.
And so for all of this, Kim Jong-il considers this all to have been a declaration of war.
Dennis, Fort Smith, Arkansas, you're next.
Hello, sir.
Hey, Ditto's Rush, come on.
Thank you.
Not so angelic, conservative, Republican enforcement.
I just wanted to say that with what we've got going on with Democrats, we have a term for those that would leave when things get going tough.
And I think that that's what we're having here.
I don't want to lose this House and Senate to cut and run Republican.
I'm having trouble following.
I'm having trouble hearing you.
It's not your fault.
Say your last sentence again.
We have a term for those that leave when the going gets tough, right?
Cut and run.
Cut and run, right.
I don't want to lose the House who cut in the middle.
Oh, I see what you're saying.
You're saying that Republicans that would either not vote or vote for Democrats here to teach Republican a lesson are simply cut and run Republicans.
I hate to say it, but that's what it appears to be to me.
It's not a.
Don't worry.
This show never makes the news unless we criticize Republicans.
Elected Republicans.
Your comment wouldn't make it on the news because your comment is chiding the very people that the Democrats and the Drive-By Media are trying to inspire to apathy.
Jim in Lancaster, Pennsylvania.
Hi, and welcome to the program.
Hi, Rush.
Thank you very much.
You bet.
I'm calling in reference to you telling us about child abuse in schools being a big problem today.
Yes.
And I was wondering if you had a breakdown of men and women there, because the drive-by media never tells us if it's a woman.
They always go, if a man does something, look at the Mark Foley thing.
They're going on about that on and on and on.
But if it's a woman doing this, they don't tell us.
And even look at Mary Kay Latano.
They make her a movie star.
She got on interviews with Katie Couric and who else.
And, you know, so how many people are there?
Yeah, what's that?
I thought 200 people in North Carolina.
200 teachers have been charged.
It does seem that...
I disagree with you about one thing.
When we do get news of it, it seems like most of the abusive teachers are women.
Yeah, but we're never told about it.
The drive-by media never keeps all hush-hush about that, or they get the kid glove treatment when they get prosecuted like Mary.
That's right.
That's because women are victims in our society, just like Muslims are victims.
That's right, right.
Women are victims.
So in the case of Deborah LeFave, she's put out there on television, and the, oh, she's so pretty.
She's so beautiful.
Wow, lucky kid.
And then they get her.
Of course, she has some sort of bipolar disorder or what have you.
And she has total remorse.
And if she plays her cards right, she'd go to law school and represent terrorists and not go to jail for it.
Yeah, right.
Because of her good works here in overcoming her big problem.
How many of those 200 were women, Rush?
Well, the story doesn't say, and I guess that sort of makes your point.
Yeah.
Because your point is if they were men, we'd be hearing about it.
We'd be hearing about it forever.
Could I ask you a favor, Rush?
Yeah, by all means.
You want me to research it?
When these things come up here and it's women are doing this, could you tell us?
Because we would never hear from anybody else.
You might cover these things a bit more on your show because how else are we going to know this?
This is an important thing.
I think out of control, feminism.
He's asking me to become the women police.
I've sworn off women, sir.
I really have.
But I will do what we can within the confines of news research here to identify most of these abusers when that aspect.
Like, you never know what a Democrat's guilty of crime in the news.
They never mention his party.
Okay, more drive-by media in action, ladies and gentlemen.
I want to tell you about a group out there.
You may have heard of them.
You may have not.
The name of the group is Women's Voices Women Vote.
They were profiled sort of today on Good Morning America by Claire Shipman.
Claire Shipman referred to the group, Women's Voices Women's Vote, as a nonpartisan group.
Mark Finkelstein at newsbusters.org, which is the Media Research Center's watchdog group on the liberal media, went to their website. to look at biographies of their key members.
He found this.
Executive Director Joe Goode comes directly from Stanley Greenberg's polling and political consulting firm.
He's a Democrat, worked for the Clintons.
His wife is Rosa DeLauro, a congressperson from Connecticut.
Joe Goode formerly worked for Democratic Congressman David Price of North Carolina.
Vice president of Women's Voices Women's Vote is Anna Greenberg, also comes from and presumably related to the Stanley Greenberg firm, has a history of working for leftist groups, including NARAL and the Economic Policy Institute.
There's a board member named Ruth Ferguson.
Ferguson worked for the Democratic Speaker of the Massachusetts House of Representatives and worked way back when to pass the Equal Rights Amendment.
Every other officer or board member has similar Democratic roots.
The clincher is that WVWV is a project of the Tides Foundation, which is the organization founded to promote a variety of leftist causes whose driving financial force is Teresa Hines Carey.
Further digging reveals that WVWV is directly promoting leftist policies.
On its frequently asked questions page, WVWV suggests that people who want to get involved download the National Council of Women's Organizations Voters Guide.
Finkelstein did found a predictable compendium of leftist position-mongering on everything from affirmative action to abortion.
Query whether promoting a partisan voter's guide brings WVWV's nonpartisan tax exempt status into question.
But Claire Shipman presented this group as nonpartisan.
You'd be saying, so what?
Russia, but leftist group's leftist group.
Well, I want you to listen to a montage of Claire Shipman and her report today on this new phenomenon of women's voices, women's vote, and who they are, what they're doing.
We hear so much about soccer moms, now security moms, but the other critical demographic, unmarried women.
It is a big group, the trick to get them to vote.
Women, specifically unmarried women, do vote in much smaller numbers than married women.
But who would benefit if more unmarried women head to the polls?
Unmarried women voters, one of the most loyal, untapped resources for the Democrats.
They vote two-thirds plus Democratic.
Female candidates are looked upon by both sexes as being more ethical, as being more above the fray, as trying harder to enact good government.
One other interesting point, when men grow disillusioned with their politicians, with their party, they tend to protest by sitting out the vote.
Not so with women, and that's another reason why women could have an even bigger voice in November.
Okay, now, the interesting thing about this is that the, by the way, the other voices you heard there were Celinda Lake, a Democrat pollster, Kelly Ann Conway, a Republican pollster, both commenting on unmarried women voters, a loyal, untapped resource for the Democrats.
Of those unmarried women that vote, two-thirds do vote for Democrats, but it's sort of like all these annual get-out-the-vote drives among young people, the MTV generation.
They register in droves, but they don't go vote.
Every year, the Democrats think they're going to take them over to top because of all this new voter registration.
Same thing with single women.
So the effort is now on, and that's what this women's voices, women's vote organization is all about, is to try to coerce and inspire single women to get out there and vote, because most of them do vote Democrat, but most of them don't vote either.
And so this is just more of the poron.
And so the idea that this is a nonpartisan group that ABC was promoting here is just something that I wanted to dispel.
So on the show today, on Good Morning America Today, co-host Chris Cuomo, a Democrat, then asks another Democrat, George Stephanopoulos, if women will come out and vote Democrat.
So you heard Claire's piece, 20 million single women out there.
We saw in the 04 election that they can be coaxed out.
4 million more came out.
How important can single women be?
And more important for one party or the other?
Well, they're a huge pool, and if they came out in large numbers, it would probably help Democrats more than Republicans.
All right, so how is women's voices women's vote doing it?
What is their strategy?
What is their focus?
Well, they're basically employing other than the assist they got today as a nonpartisan group from ABC.
They're basically running a PSA campaign.
And I, ladies and gentlemen, just happened to have an audio portion of a recent PSA from the group starring actress Angie Harmon, Regina King, and Felicity Huffman.
Do you want me to tell you about the first time I did it?
I think the best time is in the fall.
I like to do it in the morning.
I told everybody at such a big mouth about it.
I made a good choice.
All right.
So that's how they are appealing to single women.
They're obviously talking about, they want to create the illusion that they're talking about sex.
And obviously at the end of the PSA, or maybe with visuals, I haven't seen this thing.
It is made clear they're talking about voting.
First time told everybody.
Best time is in the fall.
I like to do it in the morning.
I made a good choice.
So this is how these liberals think that they're going to get single women to vote.
Sex.
Now, I want to ask you, is this clever or is this demeaning?
If it, no, those were not sex for carry parties.
There were sex for Clinton parties.
What's sex for Carrie?
Oh, wait.
Wait.
You're right.
It was.
I'm remembering this now there were, and we talked about this group on the, on the sex, sex for votes.
It was, it was.
It was if you went and voted, they didn't mention a specific way to vote, but they left it clear that if you went and voted or registered to vote Democrat or Kerry, that you'd go have sex with somebody.
That these women were offering themselves in sex to people that would vote for Kerry, college kids.
It was a bunch of college kids.
And like a rubber maid party without the maid.
And we did this story on the radio talking about these people, and they reacted to it.
We had a little fun with it.
We'll have to dig that up from the archives of rushlimbaugh.com.
Good memory check there, H.R. Sex for Carrie parties.
And now this is the way Women's Voices, Women's Votes is appealing to all the single women out there is to titillate them with sex.
Now, to me, it may work, who knows, but it's still demeaning.
It tells me they're not interested in women voting issues.
They are just relying on the fact that single women, for whatever reason, tend to vote Democrat when they vote at all.
So the titillation here is to get them to vote.
But regardless, whatever you think of this, you have to conclude that the Democrats are still afraid to use issues to inspire people to get out and vote.
It's sort of like all of these voter registration drives, they are constantly doing them, and they don't help them.
They don't matter.
And here's why.
They just simply want mass registration.
They're not inspiring people to register to vote for any specific reason other than voting Democrat.
They're just out there getting them to register.
The problem for them then becomes on Election Day, you have to have a great get-out the vote effort.
You have to find all these new registrants and then get out and find them and get them to the polls.
Republicans, on the other hand, register people to vote on the basis of issues affecting change and substantive things, and they're already motivated as a result of having registered.
So while they have a great get-out-the-vote campaign, they're just not blindly registering people just for the sake of it and then crossing their fingers and hoping that they show up.
The Republican get out of the vote machine still remains far superior to the Democrats, but the Democrats are relying on the fact that a lot of Republicans are just mad, frustrated, apathetic, and are going to get sit home as a means of teaching the Republicans a lesson.
Be back after this.
Dawn, I'm proud of you.
It was, um, it was votergasm.org.
Ladies and gentlemen, actually, there was another one, F the Vote, Votergasm.org and F the Vote, appealing to youthful lust to swing the election.
Well, this story from Slate.com.
And when would this story publish?
October 21st of 2004, right about now in the election period two years ago.
An activist group gathered in a small apartment Manhattan for their weekly meeting.
Chairs are pulled into a circle around a wooden trunk coffee table.
The attendants are well-groomed and collegiate looking.
Wheat thins and Orioles and all sorts of things were on the menu.
The night's agenda was finding a venue and sponsors for the group's election night party.
Just over two weeks until November 2, the mood was serious.
Party in question would be the climax of votergasm.org, a nonpartisan activist group whose website encourages young people everywhere to have sex with voters on election night and withhold sex from non-voters until the next presidential election.
Votergasm also features racy voting-themed photo spreads and a game in which players must guess a voter's party affiliation based solely on the person's headshot.
I know wheat thins are not partisan, nonpartisan.
If you run into somebody throwing a party with wheat thins, you're at a liberal's house.
You're at a liberal, you're at a Democrat's house if they've got wheat thins.
There's no question about it.
And especially if it's the low-fat wheat thins, then you know you're at a, not to be confused with triscuits, talking about wheat thins.
I'm telling you, you find wheat thins at a party.
Now, they may be in your cupboard, Snirdly, but you eat them, but you don't put them out when you have a party.
I'm talking about when wheat thins are on the party menu For canopies or whatever, you are odds are, it's not guaranteed to be true every year, but you are at a liberal's bash.
No question about it.
By the way, Clarice Feldman theorizes at the AmericanThinker.com that it's the Clintonoids out trying to get Kurt Weldon because of some things he wrote in his book about the incompetence of intelligence and law enforcement during the Clinton years.
Let's go back to the final answer that Bill Clinton gave during the Chris Wallace interview.
He mentions one House Republican by name, the question: the White House, the Republicans want to make the American people afraid.
Of course they do.
Of course they do.
It's a big load of hoodie.
We've got nine Iraq war veterans running for the House seats.
A three-star admiral who was on my National Security Council staff, who also fought terror, by the way, is running for the seat of Kurt Weldon in Pennsylvania.
We've got a huge military presence here in this campaign, and we just can't let them have some rhetorical device that puts us in a box we don't belong in.
That's their job.
Their job is to beat us.
I like that about Rove.
But our job is not to let them get away with it.
And if they don't, then we'll do fine.
Last night on CNN, by the way, Donna Brazile was asked by Wolf Blitzer.
A lot of people are saying this, Donna.
If you, the Democrats, can't win the House, at least maybe even the Senate this time.
You might as well forget about being a Democratic Party because you've got so much going for you right now.
The truth is, is that we still have a number of competitive races.
While the political landscape now favors a generic Democratic candidate, we still have to slug it out until the end zone in all these key congressional races.
So this is a good year for Democrats, but we still have to turn out our votes.
Somebody finally asked a Democrat, what happens if you lose?
What does it mean?
And Donna Brazil would not answer that question.
She would not answer it.
Tom in Annapolis, Maryland, welcome.
Nice to have you on the EIB network.
I have Stittos from a retired Washington K-Street lawyer.
Thank you, sir.
Great to have you.
Thank you.
Over the weekend, the Drive-By Media reported on the alleged U.N. sanctions against North Korea, and they reported that while China signed on to the resolution, China has said that it will not enforce the resolution along its 800-mile border with North Korea.
So we have a law, but no police officers to enforce it.
Hmm, they have a wall, but no police officers to enforce it.
Well, look at that, that's not hard to believe.
The actual resolution they ended up with on Saturday had no teeth in it, no military enforcement of these resolutions.
So they can't have any cargo.
They can't get this.
It all has to be inspected, but there's no enforcement.
It's just, it's typical.
There's no enforcement whatsoever.
The Chikoms insisted on this.
And Kim Jong-il will have no problem getting his cognac and fine wine.
No, of course not.
Because he'll get it over the Chinese border where the Chinese have said they will not place border guards.
Well, he'll get it through the regular channels because there's no enforcement of the.
Look, I know what you're saying, and I'm not arguing with you.
My only point I'm making is that he doesn't need the Chinese to be playing games on the border.
The resolution has no teeth.
The resolution has no enforcement mechanism whatsoever.
He will continue to get the stuff that he wants.
And now he's out there saying this is a declaration of war anyway and preparing, they say, for a second nuclear test.
Tom, thanks very much for the call.
It is a big thing.
They're building a fence.
Maybe we can build one for us.
Have you seen the fence that they're building?
I've seen pictures of it.
There is some upset, I'm hearing, between Hu Jintao and Kim Jong-il and the North Koreans, but I bet that's just spin.
Here's Carolyn in Davey, Florida.
You're next.
Great to have you on the program.
Hey, Raj Dittos from South of the Mansion.
I am calling to ask you what your remark about the not liking women that much anymore was about.
Is Mr. Snerdley starting to look better than Dawn to you?
I didn't say I don't like women anymore.
What did you hear?
You said that you're not favorable to women.
I didn't say nervousness.
I didn't say anything of the sort.
What did you say, my love?
I said for now, I said I've sworn off women.
Okay, why?
Well, I just have.
I just prefer freedom.
Oh, that's a lovely thing.
But just remember, there are so many women out here who adore you.
Well, it may be.
I never meet them.
You're going to the wrong places then.
You need to get out of Palm Beach and come on down to Davey's.
Oh, Don't agree with you there.
You're too good to be alone, my dear.
I'm not alone.
Oh, do tell us.
Well, no, I'm not a hermit.
I'm not alone.
I'm free.
All right.
As long as you have not turned switch knitting here.
Come, don't be silly.
I have a gone, Mark Folly.
Back in just a second.
Stay with us.
Okay, folks.
That's it for today.
Broadcast Excellence resumes tomorrow.
▲
Export Selection