All Episodes
Previous Next
Aug. 8, 2006 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:15
August 8, 2006, Tuesday, Hour #3
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Wowie Zowie, here we are, fastest three hours in media.
We're already at the third hour today of the Rush Limbaugh program.
This program flies by faster than anything you could do during these hours of the day.
I mean, heck, it's already Tuesday.
Ah, yes.
It's the Rush Limbaugh program with broadcast excellence defined by me, your host, simply being myself, 800-282-2882.
If you want to be on the program, email address, rush at EIBnet.com.
Grab the guy on line five and have him standing by.
Hello in there.
Grab the guy on line five.
I'm standing by.
Because I got this note here from a subscriber, rushlimbaugh.com.
Dear Rush, this morning I went to vote in Connecticut.
I had on the t-shirt, still voting Democrat, stuck on stupid.
I wore it back in May of 2006 to vote on a school tax.
Today, only the workers, it included one man and an old woman, besides one older wheelchair-bound man and his lady helper and myself and husband were in the room.
If I wanted to vote then, I would have had to turn the t-shirt inside out and backwards to vote.
Instead, I walked out, I went shopping, I went home and changed to an old baggie shorts and tank top, and I went back and voted.
They wouldn't let him vote.
And a guy on the phone here from Sacramento named Tom.
Tom, welcome.
What's the story here?
The great Maha Rushi.
Yeah, I tried to vote with one of those t-shirts, and I had to turn it inside out, too, during the last president.
You know what I think it is?
These shirts all identify rushlimbaugh.com as the source.
I don't think that's what it is.
I think that's the law about electioneering.
Oh, they said I was making a political statement.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
You can't go in there and make a political statement when you're making a political statement by voting.
Right.
Now, where I go vote, you can't.
I've never tried to wear one of my stuck-on stupid shirts.
But, I mean, the candidates have their representatives outside right outside a polling place, and they're handing out flyers and trying to talk to you and so forth.
Well, yeah, they are 100 feet away.
Yeah, that's true.
They are 100 feet away.
All right.
Well, let's keep going here with the news digest.
We'll get to more of your phone calls here in mere moments.
Leray Lundine Feldman could lose her state license as a massage therapist because she had sexual relations with her husband.
Her husband is Kirk Feldman.
He's a former client, which is the key here.
He saw her professionally as a massage babe from October 2000 to May of 2002.
And the two say they started dating in July of 2002.
But when they consummated the relationship a few months later, have we lost the people in Riolinda with that?
Let's see.
I'll leave it alone.
When they consummated the relationship a few months later, they ran afoul of a Minnesota law that bans massage therapists from having sexual relations with former clients for two years.
Former clients.
Even though she married the former client, he's a former client nevertheless.
And thus, she is in violation of the law.
Kirk Feldman, the husband, said, there's no harm.
There's no victim.
What's this about?
Keep in mind, he's just in his first year of marriage.
The case is the case.
Who's against happy endings?
Minnesotans?
Minnesotans against happy ending.
I mean, look at this.
Look at the timeline.
Okay, guy has the massage babe and starts dating the massage babe and they get married.
But the guy's a former client.
And even though he's now married to the massage babe, he's in violation of the law.
And then he says, well, there's no harm.
There's no victim.
What's this about?
And you got to throw out this comment of his that there's no victim because he's only been a groom for a year.
The case is before a judge could be decided this month with Larae Feldman facing a fine, possibly loss of her license.
The outcome could have implications for the private lives of an array of alternative health care providers.
Documents filed by the Department of Health say the therapist clearly violated state law passed by the legislature in 2000.
Larae Feldman does not deny she violated the statute, but says she didn't know it existed until the state came knock.
Ignorance of the law is no excuse.
All right, now we've got 11 missing Egyptians.
It could be in Minnesota.
It could be anywhere.
And we're hunting down massage babes who are having sex with their husbands.
What?
I would like to know what it was that inspired the law in the first place.
Why is it that a massage babe cannot have sexual relations with a former client for two years?
Why two?
Why not three?
Why not five?
Why not six months?
Why ever?
What's the deal?
What happened here?
Could somebody explain this to me?
No, I'm only kidding.
I don't want to be.
I just, it doesn't make any sense.
But along the same lines, some sperm donation clinics are now inviting men to leave a message behind for their unborn child to hear when the child is born and reaches the age of 18.
What do they say in these messages?
Well, that question inspired the sperm monologues, a thought-provoking new play at the Edinburgh Fringe Arts Festival about the motives behind these video time capsules, the Scotland.
James Farrell, the play's director and co-author, explained the process.
This is not compulsory, and the UK messages are written rather than recorded on video.
Currently, this is a more common practice in the United States.
Oh.
We sent emails around to our friends asking what they might say in such a situation, and that is where we got the idea for the piece.
So essentially, you go in there, you leave a donation of sperm, and then you talk to your sperm.
You leave a message for your sperm.
Although the title echoes the hit play, the vagina monologues, Farrell said, look, the vagina monologues are very much about women's liberation.
This is my body.
This is me.
The sperm monologues are not about men's liberation, but what we want to say is we do have feelings and we want to be noticed.
It doesn't sound like stand-up.
It sounds like a woman.
We do have feelings and we want to be noticed.
So we want to talk to our sperm.
David Milden, one of the three actors playing the parade of fathers recording their messages, said things are shifting so fast the Englishman still has his stiff upper lip, but wants to show his feelings, too.
The play also broaches the thorny issue of anonymity and how new legislation risks discouraging donors, sperm donors, in a country where an estimated 1,000 babies are born by sperm donations every year.
See, there's a philosophy lecturer, the divorced philosophy lecturer, asks in his message, is it nature or nurture?
Come and find me.
I'm a human being at sea, like you, like everyone.
That was his message to his sperm for when the sperm reaches 18.
Speaking of the vagina monologue, several concerts on the Dixie Chicks accidents and accusations tour have been canceled after slow ticket sales.
The group says it's replaced them with other dates.
Kansas City, Houston, St. Louis, Memphis, and Knoxville are among 14 cities no longer on the original schedule, released in May, according to a revised itinerary posted Thursday on the Dixie Chicks website.
Other shows, including Nashville, Los Angeles, Denver, and Phoenix, have been pushed back to later dates.
Are these?
I have to tell you, the Dixie Chicks came along after I lost my hearing.
I think, and I've never, even if I listened to a Dixie Chicks tune, I wouldn't be able to tell because I don't hear well enough music I've never heard before to discern even a melody.
Are they any good?
Have you heard Dixie Chick?
Are they any good?
They sing close.
Could it just be here that maybe they're not that good, and that's why ticket sales are wagging?
Because they're saying it's, well, they're not selling well in red states, but LA, not really a red, or it's it's that's not really a red city in a uh in a blue state.
Well, they have guitars and they have drums and all that stuff, or they're not an a cappella group.
Are they going out there?
They, okay, they wear the boots to kick the stuff in the corners and uh all that, right?
They have the country twangers like country rock, country rock, country rock.
Well, we'll just have to wait and see.
And finally, along the same lines, the story from the Daily Mail, entitled A Barbaric Kind of Beauty, clutching her Hermes holiday bag under her arm, Susan Barrington, a 52-year-old housewife from Buckinghamshire, can't help smiling as she leaves the exclusive clinic in London's Whimpole Street.
She's been given the final go-ahead to travel abroad for a cutting-edge non-surgical treatment that promises to make her look 10 years younger.
She doesn't care that the treatment's expensive, that it involves babies, and is so controversial that it's not allowed to be performed in England.
Among her well-heeled friends, this is the ultimate new elixir of youth.
The attractive brunette has opted for a controversial stem cell therapy where umbilical cord tissue from newborn babies will be injected into her body.
It may seem distasteful that thousands of women have already done it, organized by a seemingly respectable British clinic and then carried out in Rotterdam, Holland, where rules regarding stem cell therapies are not so strict.
Something like a thousand women have done this in the UK.
They go over there, get the umbilical cord stem cells, shoot it up somewhere in the body, and supposedly takes 10 years off the appearance of a 52-year-old housewife.
Hmm.
It's just food for thought, folks.
Time out, quick timeout.
We'll be back and continue in just a second.
Okay, back to the phones.
We go at 800-282-2882 at the EIB Network to Howell, Michigan.
This is Jeff, and I'm glad you called it.
Thank you, Rush.
Thank you.
You're not missing much by not listening to the Dixie Chicks.
Well, I just checked the email, and I got a bunch of emails.
Some people say that they're great performers.
They do great songs.
It's just that they're beautiful, which, of course, is a, you know, that's irrelevant thing.
But that they, it's just too bad they're libs, is what he said.
Well, my point in Corona this afternoon is that When I listen to the reports about all the collateral damage due to or that are being reaped upon the citizens of Lebanon, nobody's reminding anybody that they're the ones who voted Hezbollah in and what did they expect.
I mean, you don't hear anything from the media.
Wait, I'm not sure I get this.
Nobody's reminded.
Damage the Israeli damage on citizens?
Sure.
I mean, the bombing and the citizens are being killed, and everybody is worried about the citizens.
Well, they're the ones that voted Hezbollah into office.
Oh, okay.
You know what?
I made a point last week, I think, discussing this.
And I must say this point irritated some peoples.
When we were talking about, everybody's talking about the civilian casualties, the first thing I said was, how do we know who's Hezbollah and who's citizen?
They all dress the same over there.
And with these photos coming out of Atacana and everywhere else, we know now that photos are faked.
And I also think that situations are being staged.
That is just as bad as faked and altered photos when photojournalists, quote unquote, go along with staging of scenes.
But the point I made was, you know, at some point, you'd have to think, if you believe in the concept of good guys and bad guys, and then if you further believe that we are the good guys and that our allies are the good guys, then you'd have to say at some point there is a price, there is a consequence to be paid if you enable terrorists and bad guys.
And some people say, they have no choice, Rush.
They're veritable prisoners of Hezbollah.
That may be, but I don't think it's true in all cases.
But at any rate, it's a good observation on your part.
I'm still struck by this.
I know this is highly offensive to people in our currently politically correct world, but I'm literally amazed.
Well, no, I say that too much.
I'm not amazed.
I just struck by the lack of historical context that average people have when it comes to fighting wars.
Nobody likes them.
War is hell.
War is, but they happen.
And in the past, one of the primary methods employed to win a war was to affect as many civilian casualties as possible.
You can't deny this.
The bombing raids over 12 Japanese cities, not to mention Hiroshima and Nagasaki, who do you think the targets were?
It certainly wasn't Japanese military installations.
The bombing of Hamburg and Dresden in Germany in World War II, it certainly wasn't German military installations that were the sole targets there.
This used to be accepted.
I think one of the ways that makes it difficult now is that we didn't see these civilian casualties.
They're just reported as X number killed today in the Battle of the Whatever in wherever.
Today, we've got drive-by media helping stage civilian massacres and misery and plasticing the pictures all over the world.
And, of course, people are decent and they look at this.
How can this be?
How can we be doing this?
Because there's no understanding of history or historical context.
Or there really isn't, in some cases, maybe a willingness to accept and understand just what war is.
But war now has become strange as it can be.
Surgical strikes, limited engagements, minimalist projections of power.
And this actually prolongs them.
It's like, you know, these ceasefire resolutions.
Let me give you a real radical thought.
I mentioned this at the outset of this wall.
I think one of the primary reasons that these wars continue is all these peace resolutions and ceasefires.
They've just delayed the inevitable.
And they have allowed the enemy, the bad guys, to ramp up.
Well, we had a soundbite.
I forget who it was.
Oh, it's Stephanopoulos and this guy.
Let me go back and find this, Mike.
Well, those two bites of Stephanopoulos talking with his buddy.
Go back and grab Cut 10.
I'm going to illustrate.
So this is going to be very good.
This is going to make it totally understandable.
I won't even have to say it myself.
Anderson Cooper 360, CNN, talking to his correspondent, Tom Foreman.
And Cooper says, there are those who say that Israel underestimated the strength of the Hezbos.
We have CNN's Tom Foreman to look at where Hezbollah got its military strength.
Hezbollah may seem like many guerrilla armies, but military analysts say Hezbollah is much better prepared than most for open warfare.
His boneless forces are brave.
They know how to find cover.
They know how to use their weapons effectively.
Most grill-up groups don't.
They fight poorly.
They run away in the face of danger.
Another thing that Hezbollah has going for is sheer geography.
Their homeland here in southern Lebanon is full of mountains and trails and little villages, and they have had almost 25 years to dig in.
Stop the tape.
25 years to dig in.
The Hezbos have had 25 years to dig in.
Why?
What has permitted that?
Ceasefires.
Peace plans.
UN resolutions.
It is my learned belief that all of these ceasefires and resolutions, when you're talking about genuine bad guys, when you're talking about, you know, there is right, there is wrong.
There's good, there's bad, there's evil, there's angelic.
These guys are clearly the bad guys.
There shouldn't be any debate about it.
It's sad that there is.
But we want to establish the moral equivalence, don't we?
We want to explain that they might be the moral equivalent of our founding fathers, the Boston Tea Party.
Yes, anything to denigrate America by comparing these people to our founding fathers or our past in some way.
But nevertheless, 25 years to dig in.
Imagine if 25 years ago they'd have been wiped out.
They wouldn't have had anybody left to dig in with.
So 25 years to dig in, to ramp up, to arm up.
All those 25 years, how many ceasefires were there?
Multiple.
How many peace resolutions were there?
Multiple.
They actually contribute to violence.
They make more of it and more war.
Yes.
Absolutely right.
Living legend.
Learn it, love it, live it.
Rush Limbaugh behind this.
A golden EIB microphone at the EIB network.
And we're high atop the EIB building in Midtown Manhattan today.
Listen to this story.
This is out of Orlando, Florida.
It's gruesome, so hang in there.
Police in Orlando, Florida are searching for the drivers of three vehicles who ran over a pedestrian early Monday and didn't stop to help.
Investigators said the victim was first hit by the driver of a silver Dodge Durango on Orange Blossom Trail near Silver Star Road at around midnight.
The TV reporter in Orlando said the impact left the victim's body in pieces.
While the man's body was in the street, two more cars ran over the men, and no one stopped to help.
Anyone with information concerning this incident is urged to call a crime line.
And they give the phone number.
Never.
I, you know, I'm...
I thought I was going to comment on this, but I don't think I will.
Because there's something more important here, ladies and gentlemen.
The FBI has issued an urgent nationwide alert for 11 Egyptian students who entered the U.S. last week, but failed to show up for their courses at Montana State University.
An FBI advisory says there are at present no known connections to any terrorist group, but that the students are to be approached with caution and taken into custody.
They are here illegally, and they are wanted for questioning.
It was only yesterday they issued this news and said, no problem, no threat here, no big deal.
We just want to find these guys.
Now, an advisory is out for these 11 guys.
The advisory comes just over a month before the five-year anniversary of the 9-11 terror attacks on the United States.
Peter King, Republican New York chairman, House Homeland Security Committee, said this is, of course, very serious, being closely tracked.
And they have issued the names of the 11 Egyptians.
Maybe it's just me, but what, and nothing against you people in Montana, but what would a bunch of Egyptian students want to go to college in Montana for?
I mean, it would seem to me to be a great place not to get noticed, which there is a red flag.
And I'm not putting Montana down.
You don't associate Egyptians going to Montana.
Now, I may be guilty of some violation of political correctness there, but something about this.
Are they flight schools there?
Who knows?
But that would be the first thing that would raise just a red flag.
Okay, we need to follow this.
Grace in Salisbury, Maryland, I'm glad you're waited.
Welcome to the EIB network.
Yes, greetings, Rush, the professor of my mind.
Well, thank you very much.
For advanced studies, because I've been listening to you for so long and I just couldn't live without you.
And I knew you'd be the only person to hit on this today.
The Lebanese Hezbollah person that was captured by the Israelis.
Didn't he look neat?
He wasn't beat up.
He wasn't black-eyed.
He wasn't anything.
And he was just sitting there discussing.
And he was from Lebanon, but he was embedded or had been embedded with all of these Hezbollah for how many years?
We don't know now.
Yeah, but he'd been trained in Iran.
Yeah, and then he went to Iran and trained and came back and killed eight and captured two of the Israeli soldiers.
But what I want to know is the UN wants to put a Lebanese army on the southern part of Lebanon to protect the Israelis from any Hezbollah infiltration or bombs or rockets or whatever.
Now, how are we going to know?
How is the world going to know?
They put on a uniform.
Does that make them not Hezbollah?
Right now they don't have one.
I mean, it's like, this is stupid.
I mean, it's totally stupid.
This is why a lot of people are wondering if there's more to meets the eye in this resolution, because the Lebanese army probably has been infiltrated by Hezbollah already, and the Lebanese government is afraid of Hezbollah.
The idea that the Lebanese army is going to disarm these people and keep them disarmed in association with an international force, I don't trust any international force.
Most of the international force is going to hate the Israelis, too.
Everybody hates Israelis.
Poor Bury Ray Israeli.
I'd go over there and fight if I could.
Yeah, it's no, I think your instincts are right on the money on this.
This is just more the same.
I know that this resolution is focused on establishing an actual functioning government that is going to enforce its own borders and participate in the process of keeping Hezbollah disarmed.
But I don't, I'm just a consumer here.
I'm just an average guy, just an average American, and I'm watching all this news, and we're reading and hearing about what a great bunch of guys the Hezbos are, all the great social work they do, and all the hospitals that they've built, and all the water that they produced, and all they're just wonderful guys.
They just have really, really, really turned that country around.
And now all of a sudden we're supposed to believe that people who mean this much to a little country like Lebanon are somehow going to be ostracized and disarmed and looked at as a problem.
None of it washes to me.
None of it makes any sense whatsoever.
Now, if I were seeing stories in the media about what a bunch of creeps the Hezbos are and how they're a bunch of terrorists, if I was seeing accurate portrayals of these guys, then I might have a different attitude.
We're being told how much the Lebanese love these people.
Oh, schools, social programs, doctors, medicine.
They probably have health care second only to Cuba.
So I don't see where it follows that an international force or even especially the Lebanese, Lebanese army, is going to seriously deal these people a blow and impair their ability to wage war.
I just don't see it.
Michael, cell phone call from Ohio.
Welcome to the program.
Mr. Limbaugh, let me just say, even though I disagree with you on about 95% of the issues, it's an honor to speak with you.
Thank you, sir.
I am a liberal.
I'm a deemed Democrat.
But I just want to say that as much as it pains me, I do believe that you are extremely right on on the Middle East issue right now.
Originally, I was very anti-Iraq war, but now I don't think that that really matters anymore, why we're there.
I think that the current issue right now with Israel and Lebanon or Hezbollah just proves that we have to stay there and that our presence is needed, and that maybe we should even increase and openly support and fight for Israel.
Wow.
What caused you to undergo this change of thought?
Well, I think a lot of it was with how much we've been giving the Palestinians and pressuring Israel to subside to them and give them concessions, give them land, pull out, as well as with Lebanon and Hezbollah, and just to see the reaction and that it's not made things better.
It's actually made things worse by doing that.
All right, so you've discovered or decided land for peace is a hoax, that it's not led to what it promised.
Correct.
This had to be pretty easy.
This doesn't work at all.
Well, this is interesting that you call to admit this because you're admitting that a significant portion of your worldview has changed because it was challenged.
And a lot of people, either side, conservative liberal, when their worldview is challenged, they tune it out.
They don't want to deal with the possibility it might be wrong.
So they either ignore it or they consider what they're hearing propaganda not really true.
But somehow it got through to you.
That's incredible.
I try to be open-minded about things.
Not all liberals are.
Well, liberals are open-minded.
Some, yeah.
That's diplomatic.
They don't irritate me as much as they irritate you, though.
Well, good.
Well, I'm glad you called.
And In a small sense, welcome home.
Thank you.
All right.
Thank you very much, Michael.
Did you notice how I said that liberals are open-minded?
And I'm sure you people, what?
Ladies and gentlemen, I'm just practicing my Diplo speak.
When you say someone is open-minded, you're being a diplomat instead of calling them or saying that they have holes in their head.
It's simply saying they're open-minded.
They don't get it.
And that's, see, anybody can be a diplomat.
Rose in Houston, you're next.
Appreciate your patience.
Hello.
Hi, Rush.
Thank you so much for taking the call.
You bet.
From a former liberal, Mega Dittos, to you.
Another former liberal, two of them in a row.
Yes, yes.
Hubba hubba.
I have a comment about the media, the mainstream media, and how I'm extremely frustrated with the way they're handling Cuba.
I know what Cuba is myself.
And let me tell you what they're not reporting.
They're just taking as fact and at face value this what the authorities are saying, that you know Castro is recovering, that he'll be back in power next week.
But what they're not telling you is that you know the Committee FOR THE Defense OF THE Revolution and the Rapid Response Brigade.
They're rounding up people, they are warning them that they have been authorized to use force if necessary and the dissidents, particularly in the East, are very nervous.
So I'm just shocked and very appalled at that.
They don't even ask.
Let me explain this to you, Rose.
Liberals believe I mean, and and the drive-by media is liberal liberals believe anything a communist, socialist or democrat party government tells them.
That's it.
There's no challenge, there's no disbelief, there is no curiosity, it's just.
Oh, I mean.
You are well aware that there is much admiration for Fidel Castro in the American left, the American media, and people might wonder, why is this what?
And you know there are a number of reasons.
Throw out the ideology for a second.
Throw out the fact that well, he's a fellow traveler, you know he's a.
He's one of these guys that came down from the hills and the jeep and he took on that evil dictator, that right-wing guy Batista, and he got him out of there.
And, of course, there's a.
There's a.
There's a romance associated with this, just as there is a romance associated with that mass murderer, Shaguevara.
There's a there's a romantic notion to left-wing revolutionaries seizing power from the corrupt right wing.
It's almost the way Democrats look at the election in November this year and in 2008.
They are the revolutionaries, the modern day encapsulation of Fidel Castro and Che Guevara, trying to take back the government from the evil Cheney and Bush and Rumsfeld and Rice, and they're using their kook fringe base to come out of the hills and the jeeps.
This time, in this era, by virtue of the internet, to Take out these evil right-wing despots.
There's this, there's a commonality that they feel, but the real, the real attraction that leftists have to Castro, trust me on this, folks, the real attraction is his total dictatorial power.
That is what they admire.
The fact that he's been able to secure it and hold on to it for all these years, because that is their dream.
That kind of power, maybe not dictatorial, but that kind of power.
They just envy it.
And they marvel at Castro's ability to have acquired it and held on against the big, bad United States.
Why?
He thwarted our exploding cigar trick.
He thwarted the Bay of Pigs.
He stood up to JFK, the Cuban Missile Crisis.
That was a conundrum for him in a little bit of a dilemma.
Because who do we love more, Castro or JFK?
That's a tough one.
They sided with JFK on this one, but it ended well.
Cuba's still there.
JFK is still a great guy.
So, but there is, there's this attraction.
And in fact, they marvel at the power that he's got as a leftist.
Make no mistake about it.
Back in a second.
Okay, welcome back, folks.
I got to say something here very quickly.
I'm glad that I had this thought before the program ended today.
I want to go back to the news that the FBI has issued an urgent nationwide alert for 11 Egyptian students who entered the United States last week but failed to show up for their courses at Montana State University.
An FBI advisory says that there are at present no known connections to any terrorist group, but that the students are to be approached with caution and taken into custody.
The advisory says they are here illegally and wanted for questioning.
Okay, so the FBI has issued an advisory, a nationwide alert.
They are to be approached with caution, taken into custody.
I know that many of you out there will heed the FBI's call to try to track these people down for the good of your country.
Now, some of you may be asking this very important question.
Are you allowed to profile in searching for these Egyptians?
That is, when you are looking for these Egyptian students, are you allowed to look for Egyptians?
This is a very important question.
Now, the FBI has published all of their names.
Six of these guys have Mohammed as one of their names.
Many of these guys have five and six names.
Six of them, six of the 11, have Mohammed as their name.
But that could be just a coincidence.
That is still not a justification for looking for Egyptians.
Just because they are from Egypt and because six of them are named Mohammed does not mean that you should be profiling by looking for Egyptians named Mohammed.
Be very careful.
I am warning you.
Because if you happen to track down one or more of these guys and it was learned that you profiled in doing, even though you were following the guidelines issued by the FBI, they're from Egypt and six of them are named Mohammed and so forth.
If it is discovered that you apprehended any of these people as citizen vigilantes, if it's learned that you profiled, that you were targeting Egyptians and targeting people named Mohammed, it could get ugly for you.
Please approach this with the greatest of caution.
Seems that women are not alone in suffering postpartum depression.
A strikingly high number of new fathers are affected as well.
Researchers supported yesterday survey more than 5,000 U.S. couples that had recently had a baby.
14% is mothers, 10% of fathers were found to have significant levels of depression.
Not surprised, more suffering and more victims in America over childbirth.
Well, okay, maybe guys are depressed because you lose your wife after the kid's born.
Isn't that the purpose?
This, too, and ladies and gentlemen in the bumper rotation has happened to come up by coincidence walk like an Egyptian.
And I take the occasion of this bump coming up with a rotation to remind you: do not profile and search for these missing 11 Egyptian men by examining the way they walk.
And if you do capture one of these guys, just tell the FBI or whoever, the federal authorities, that you were actually looking for dangerous, threatening-looking grandmother types like they do at the airports.
See you tomorrow.
▲
Export Selection