All Episodes
Previous Next
July 31, 2006 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:22
July 31, 2006, Monday, Hour #3
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
And greetings and welcome back, ladies and gentlemen.
Rush Limbaugh, highly trained broadcast specialist and a program that meets and surpasses all audience expectations on a daily basis.
Happy to have you along.
Fastest three hours in media.
Here we are already at the third hour.
And the phone number for phone calls later is 800-282-2882.
All right, Mike, take the music down.
We have Prime Minister Netanyahu on the phone with us from his Knesset office in Jerusalem.
Only have 10 minutes, so I want to get right to it.
First, welcome to the program.
It's great to talk to you again, sir.
Well, it's very good to talk to you, Rush.
All right.
Some observers in the United States are sensing a new Israel here, less willing to commit to total victory as in the past on the basis of the way current conflict with the Hezbollah group is being waged.
Is that true?
I hope not.
I've given my support as opposition leader to the government.
The people of Israel overwhelmingly have given the support for victory.
That is, to remove the threat.
Much as the U.S. during the Cuban Missile Crisis said, those missiles have to go.
We say Hezbollah and those missiles have to go because otherwise there'll be no peace for Lebanon, no peace for Israel, no peace for anyone.
We're hearing, I'm hearing some discontent in this country that there's some concern that the current prime minister isn't willing to unleash the full complement of Israeli ground forces.
If that's true, what's the reason?
I don't know.
We're in the middle of a war, and I don't want to start second-guessing.
I think the important thing is to fix your eye on the goal.
The goal set by the government is to remove, eliminate the missile threat, and eliminate and break Hezbollah's fighting ability.
And whatever means are required, and then those means should be used.
Land, air, sea, you name it.
I think it's important to understand, Rush, that we're not just dealing with a Hezbollah Islamic militant threat.
We're dealing with an Iranian-backed assault on a Western country, and we're just the first target.
And they openly say that we're the first target.
We're the small state.
You are the big state.
Europe, though it doesn't understand it, is a middle-sized state.
So it doesn't really side up with us when 2 million of our people are hunkered down in bunkers, when our cities are rocketed, our children are murdered, and when we respond against these terrorists who are hiding deliberately in civilian areas, they attack us.
They're actually, in doing so, attack themselves.
I don't think that the U.S. has any such misunderstandings, any such lack of clarity.
I hope that the Israeli government doesn't have lack of clarity.
We need clarity in our target, and the target is to remove our common enemy committed to our destruction and something that we have to remove as a clear and present threat to our future, to our security.
I couldn't agree with you more.
I'm not trying to foment discord between you and the Prime Minister either.
It's just that so many of us who support you remember past Israeli involvement, six-day war, Kipper War, and it just looks different this time.
And so we ask questions.
Why?
Because like you, we all know that the focus of this is Syria and Iran.
We don't hear our government talking to us like that.
We don't hear our government telling us that in this country.
Do you ever sit there wondering as an individual, I know these are maybe tough questions for you because you're leader of Likud Party and you all are very united today in this latest battle with Hezbollah.
Do you ever wonder to yourself why the U.S. doesn't act now to take out the regime in Iran?
The entire world knows who's behind this.
They've been helping Al-Qaeda, attacking troops in Iraq.
They're not far from getting nuclear weapons.
Well, I think this is the greatest question of our time.
It is not only of monumental importance to Israel because Iran, while denying that the Holocaust took place, is openly declaring its intention to make another Holocaust with the six million Jews of Israel that they intend to eliminate.
Iran also intends to become a nuclear power, an empire, with long-range missiles that now reach every capital in Europe and within a decade would reach the eastern seaboard.
And they have a crazy, particular Shiite conception of a grand apocalypse that is supposed to occur right about now, in which millions will die on all sides on both sides, and this brand of Shiism will rule the world.
Now, you may ask, how is it possible religious wars died in the 17th century?
Not for them.
Not for them.
Not for the likes of al-Qaeda, who smashed into buildings in New York, and not for Iran that is building an atomic arsenal for that effect.
So, what they've really done here is fired the first test salvo.
And the question of our response, by our response, I mean not only Israel's response to Hezbollah, but the international response to Iran and its waste station, Syria.
I think that's a crucial question that you're raising.
Now, President Bush has said, and he said something very important just recently, a month ago.
He said that he would not let Iran acquire nuclear weapons.
That is very important.
How he plans to do it, what means he plans to use, of course, he leaves with himself.
But there's no question right now that there ought to be a division of labor.
The U.S. and the responsible members of the international community, if you can find some, they should press Iran and Syria to cease and desist the support and arming of Hezbollah.
And Israel should be left to do the job that it must do, that is to disarm Hezbollah and destroy its missile arsenal.
Is anybody to be done?
Well, is anybody stopping you from doing that?
Anybody putting the brakes on you?
I don't think so.
Not yet, I have to say.
I don't think that, you know, we've had a limit.
All wars have limited time.
You know, it's not an unlimited amount of time anyway.
And I said that from day one.
And the time that you have available, you should use with the power that you have available.
The more power you use, the less time you need.
So obviously, we don't have unlimited time, and therefore we should use more power, a lot more power, to crush Hezbollah.
That's what's required.
And I think if Israel shows this resolve, if the Israeli government shows this resolve, then America, first of all, America, would respect it.
At the end of the day, go with the Arabs.
Let me try this quite a little bit of a lengthy question, and I know the phone connection here is not the best, but I want to ask you this because it's a topic that's really roiling much of the American population.
And that is that the war has two aspects: the PR-Spin War and the reality.
And the media, Mr. Prime Minister, suggests that Israel is losing the PR-media war and has got to change its tactics so that it can win the PR-media war.
I don't think that Israel can ever win a media war, and I don't think George Bush can ever win a media war because the world's media is not interested in the facts of reality in this current conflict.
You can point out the reality of the Hezbollah people using civilian human shields all day long.
It still will be ignored.
Do you think you can lose the real conflict with Hezbollah if you also lose the spin war?
Or do you not care about that?
Just focus on the reality of actually winning the war as that used to be defined.
First of all, win the war.
Win the war on Ikran and win it quickly and decisively.
That would be always my first preference.
But secondly, you're quite right that indeed from the 20th century on, we've learned that to cement a military victory, you must have a political victory.
To have a political victory, you must win the battle for public opinion.
To win the battle for public opinion, you must convince that public that your cause is just.
And the cause of your enemy is unjust.
There's never been a more just war than this one.
That's obvious.
We were fired upon from Lebanon and from Gaza when we left and vacated every square inch in a totally unprovoked manner.
Our soldiers were kidnapped and murdered.
Our cities were rocket upon.
So this is a just war.
Now, can Americans understand that?
I happen to think that Americans understand that very well and overwhelmingly so.
I don't believe that is the case in Europe, in Western Europe at least, perhaps in Eastern Europe, where they understand power a little better.
But Western Europe shows signs of debilitation, signs of not understanding where their interests are and where morality is.
They view everything in a post-colonial prism as though we are colonialists.
We, who are living in our land, who are gripping on to our land for 3,000 years, we're supposed to be the colonials.
But nevertheless, I sense a crack in Europe, too.
It is not that they support Israel.
It is that they don't support the Islamists.
And they don't support the Islamists because they are being plagued by the same plague.
So for them, it's a box on both your houses.
But what America knows, Europe doesn't know.
It's our house.
It's the same house.
Israel, America, the free societies of Europe, we're the same house.
And the likes of Iran and Hezbollah and Al-Qaeda, they want to destroy our house.
Israel, to be sure, would be their number one target, but we're only their first target.
And they say so.
They want eventually to get you.
And they have no problems and no inhibition.
Firing upon civilians, hiding among civilians.
These are, by the way, two war crimes according to the Geneva Convention.
Not only can you not deliberately fire on civilians, you cannot deliberately hide among civilians.
You have here this criminal organization supported by criminal regimes with a criminal goal of destroying Israel, but ultimately destroying the West.
Let's not be fooled.
Let's gear ourselves and fight this battle, and let's win it.
Well, we admire every effort you're making.
We really do.
It's tough to wage war on an enemy that considers the death of its own children a victory.
Just one more question because I know your time is limited and you have to go, but I'm trying to figure out how you have a ceasefire, how we can have a ceasefire with terrorists who are backed by Iran, which have as their goal the destruction of Israel.
Has anybody, any country, anybody from the United Nations or anybody else explained to you in Israel how this ceasefire, a sustainable, meaningful ceasefire with a bunch of terrorists, would actually work?
No, I don't think so.
I don't think a ceasefire by itself will work.
I think it will work the other way.
I think running away from terror or not finishing terror gets terror to come back and bite you, bite you even with greater bites.
I think that the important thing is what are the conditions that lead to a ceasefire?
And it seems to me that the most important thing is to dismantle Hezbollah's fighting ability and destroy that missile arsenal.
That's when you should have a ceasefire because they can't fire anymore.
Okay, so what you're describing here is a ceasefire that results from your victory.
Yes.
Exactly.
Makes perfect sense to everybody.
Well, look, I'm glad you made time for us today, Mr. Prime Minister.
I know it's hectic for you right now.
We appreciate the time very much, and the best to you.
Always good to talk to you, Rush.
All right, for support.
You bet.
That's former Prime Minister of Israel Benjamin Netanyahu and a quick timeout.
Your phone calls coming up next.
Do not go away.
I am not joking.
I'll send you the email.
We are back, El Rushbo, having more fun than a human being should be allowed to have.
Thanks again to former Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Bibi Netanyahu.
Met him in Israel the first time I went there, the only time, 1993.
Subsequently, when he was the prime minister of Israel, he visited New York once, and I was on vacation, and the call came in that he would like to meet with me staying at the Essex House, I think, on Central Park South.
And I said, well, I mean, I'll come off vacation for this.
So I went in there and we smoked cigars for an hour.
They'd closed off one of the dining rooms or one of the ballrooms.
That's where he was receiving various people.
I met Abe Rosenthal.
Abe Rosenthal was in the line waving to go in.
He was very nice, too.
This is after he had left the New York Times.
I don't even think he was writing for the Daily News then.
But anyway, he's a walking education, Mr. Netanyahu is.
And if he ever leads the country again, it won't be a bad thing.
Jim, in South Bend, Indiana, you're next.
I'm glad you waited, sir.
Welcome to the show.
Thank you, Rush.
Megan, Notre Dame Irish dittos to you and to your listening audience, an intelligent listening audience.
That's exactly right.
And I'd like to say hi to my son, who's an intern out on Wall Street this summer, and he's also following the Rush Limbaugh School of school, and he'll be out there making money for the country.
Terrific, as well as for himself.
That's important, too.
Yes, sir.
Rush, to the point, when I was at the Air Force Academy, I wrote a paper, and the paper says basically what you've been saying, and that is a war is nation versus nation.
And McNamara's war, Vietnam, was the first war ever fought that I could find where we did not go against the nation.
We went against the military.
And as a result, we never seem to break the will of the people who are supporting or coalescing to the military, such as Hezbollah in Lebanon or to Saddam Hussein.
And I just wish people would understand for over 3,000 years, it has always been nation versus nation.
And civilian casualties, destruction of infrastructure.
This is why you don't want to go to war.
And this is why you should not want to go to war against the United States.
Because we should go in, and instead of risking lives, American servicemen on the ground, we should be, as Beebe said, we should be going in, and power shortens the duration of war.
I hope Israel does this, and I hope the world understands that war is nation against nation.
It's not a problem.
Well, you know, I don't know that.
See, I keep asking myself that, Jim.
I've had more military people I can think of.
The first person that told me this, a good friend of mine, now deceased, a Vietnam veteran, a general, just all-round rack and tour, B.T. Collins in Sacramento.
He said, look, and he was, in fact, he did this in a letter to the editor, to the Sacramento B. There was something going on.
It must have been contra something.
That's what I think was contra-Cold War related.
And a bunch of the writers in letters to the editors.
We're typical bloggers today on the left.
Oh, we can't.
And he got frustrated and he wrote this big long letter to the editor that said, look, you people, the purpose of armies is to kill people and break things.
That's it.
And we're not using armies for that purpose now.
We use armies to deliver food.
We use armies.
They still engaged in warfare tactics, and our soldiers are best trained in the world and carrying out their orders.
When it comes to civilians, when it comes to nation versus nation, that's you're right.
That's what I think there's less of a commitment and willingness to do that.
We can target a military or an enemy military installation or an enemy air force or what have you, but that's not the traditional ways that wars have been won.
You can debilitate the enemy in that regard.
You also make a good point about we never won the hearts and minds of the North Vietnamese people.
I don't know that we can win the minds and hearts of the Lebanese people or any other group in the midst of a war right now, but if they were made to pay the consequences for supporting the people they're supporting, it might have some effect.
Now, I know that's a hard thing to say, folks, but we're talking about war here.
We're not talking about romperoom or the Oprah show.
We're not talking about political correctness in this country.
War is still war.
Finally, you made a good point about Bibi.
My first question to him had to do with, is this a new Israel?
Are we seeing an Israel that's not willing to go all out as it had in the past?
When I first asked him that question, he was reluctant to go there because they are unified in this country, in Israel, in this battle.
Over 90% of the Israeli population supports the government and what they're doing.
And he doesn't want to make any public criticisms and all that.
But later in the interview, as you remind me, he did point out that power shortens the duration.
And so I think he fully well understands, well, I don't want to put words in his mouth or emotions in his heart, but I think he understands the question when I ask it to him, is if this is a different Israel.
Now, there's an interesting story that I just got from www.israeliNN.
I guess that's the IsraeliNewsNetwork.com.
I'm not sure.
But the headline here is incredible to me.
Morale remains high as Hezbollah begins to crumble.
And this is interesting.
Morale of the Israeli Defense Forces, morale of the Israeli people.
Nowhere else am I seeing that Hezbollah is crumbling.
This Israeli news source, and by the way, I'm going to link to this.
If you read this account of what's going on, it's unlike anything else you're seeing or reading anywhere.
It's just fact, A, B, C, and D up and down the line.
All right, we are back having more fun than a human being should be allowed to have Rush Limbaugh with half my brain tied behind my back just to make it fair.
So here I was asking earlier today, I wonder what Dominique de Villepin thinks of all this.
I haven't heard him say anything.
And Sternley said, oh, yeah, he said something.
Oh, I just found out what it is.
Puke City.
French leaders praised Iran and disparaged Israel on Monday in two separate news conferences held in Beirut and in the Paris area.
Prime Minister Dominique de Villepin told reporters at the news conference in France that Israel's willingness to suspend its airstrikes on Hezbollah terror targets was only a first step, still not enough.
De Villepin maintained that the cessation of the aerial attacks is insufficient in light of the situation in Lebanon.
At the news conference held in Beirut, French Foreign Minister Felipe Duste-Blauzé, and I don't know how you pronounce French names like this, so I'll just Americanize it.
Philippe Duste-Blaise praised Iran as a stabilizing force in the Middle East.
He said this.
He said this in Beirut.
The French Foreign Minister Felipe Duste-Blaisé told reporters that Iran is an outstanding country with great people and an honorable civilization.
It has a crucial role in the region.
Well, Iran is the primary patron of the Hezbollah.
It's a terror organization.
Fired close to 1,800 Katusha missiles at northern Israeli communities in the past 20 days, killing 19 civilians and injuring hundreds, hundreds more.
So the French are back as we know and love them.
Here is Jose in Grand Rapids.
Jose, welcome.
Thank you, Rush.
Much has been said about the so-called green light that Bush is giving to Israel.
But I think that green light is not just coming from the U.S.
I think that the Arab League and some of the governments in the Middle East have finally come to the realization in some of the corridors of power, except in Iran, of course, that they have come to see that Islamic fundamentalism has become a major threat for the region than the U.S. Bush boogeyman.
And the Palestinian cause, it's obvious for everybody after the election of Hamas that it has transmuted from a so-called local patriotic cause with socialism as its program to become officially part of the International Islamic Fundamentalist Jihad.
And its goal is Sharia law and theocracy throughout the whole Middle East all the way to Spain.
And so the obvious failure of the Palestinians in electing Hamas has been paraded before the whole world.
They do not want peace with Israel.
The cause of Palestine has become the excuse for the failure of the Palestinians at governing.
There's a theory out there, Jose, that didn't the new Israeli or the Palestinian Prime Minister Abbas, Mahmoud Abbas, wasn't he ready to put to a vote to his people whether or not they just wanted to shut it down and peacefully coexist with Israel and let it be done.
And that's really when the Hezbollah got in gear.
That's when the Iranians and everybody ordered the Hezbollahs to get in gear.
They couldn't have that.
That's the last thing in the world they want.
I'm sorry.
I agree.
That's exactly right.
Israel is becoming now the real battlefront for the war against fundamentalist Islam.
Baghdad and Iraq has become secondary.
That's why Al-Qaeda wants to jump in on the show.
But you know, there's a major shift in the Middle East as a result of 9-11 first and second of the war in Iraq.
I think 9-11 even shook some people in the Middle East.
And whether genuinely or not, I think even Arafat, what people have to realize that Arafat comes is a product of the Cold War more than a post-9-11.
And so the battle within the Palestinians came after 9-11 when they started dancing in the streets.
And Hamas and Hezbollah became more powerful as they saw that Arafat, the PLO, and all that were old-timers that were not going to bring what they really wanted.
And so they really do not care about its two-state solution.
This is a fundamentalist, religious, zealot movement that is fired up to the hilt, and it's not going to be stopped in any other fashion.
The people in the Middle East, the powers that be, are afraid of it, just as everybody else.
On one hand, the U.S. is not going to abandon Israel no matter what.
And eventually, Europe is going to have to choose between The disappearance of Israel or the establishment of a caliphate all the way south of Europe.
And I think when that time comes, and the time is here, the battle for Israel has become the most important battle in the war of Israel.
I'm going to tell you, you are very, very right about that.
By the way, ladies and gentlemen, this is Jose from Grand Rapids, Michigan.
He is not a scholar.
Well, Jose, are you a scholar?
Yes, I consider myself such.
I'm an independent writer.
I ran out or was ran out of the academia for obvious reasons.
But that's what I, yes, I do.
Well, I was run out of academia, too.
It was called speech class and ballroom dance taught by a drill sergeant, former drill sergeant in the wax.
You were thrown out, I'm sure, for a different reason.
But anyway, I just wanted to point out: this is no guest expert.
This is just a caller and listener to the Rush Limbaugh program with one of the most knowledgeable audiences, firmly established now, second most knowledgeable audience in well, it's the most knowledgeable broadcast audience in the world in the country.
The most knowledgeable broadcast, radio and TV audience, this program, the Pew Center, and their exhaustive research has documented that today.
And Jose here is a glittering example of that.
Shining, shining example of that.
One thing you said, Jose, two things I want to comment on.
First, it goes underreported how nervous the Arab League really is about this and how nervous they are about the Iran-Syria axis.
The drive-by media in this country late last week tried to say, more and more Arab sympathy with Hezbollah and Syria over this.
At that story, New York Times purported to report that, but it didn't say it.
All they could do was get comment from the quote-unquote Arab street.
And you might say, what kind of power does the Arab street have?
They don't run their governments.
Second thing that you said was at the end of your comments when you said that the battle for Israel has become the battle, the most important battle in the war on terror.
Now, I know that there are a lot of Americans who don't want to hear that for a host of reasons.
I know that there are a lot of Americans who think that if we didn't support Israel, if Israel were not an ally, if we didn't give them military and foreign aid, if we weren't so publicly supportive of them, government to government, that we wouldn't have any trouble with Islamic terrorists and so forth.
That the vast majority of the enemies we have in the Arab world today are due strictly to our association with Israel.
If you are one American who thinks that, I know it's tempting, it's very seductive to believe it, but it isn't true.
We are just as much an enemy as any other Western culture and Western society is, because whether you are Jew or Christian or what have you, if you don't fit the model that the Islamo-fascists have created, you are considered an infidel.
And they say that they're working on instructions from their religion to wipe out everybody who's not a proper Muslim.
And they hide behind a religion, so it's very difficult to criticize them without getting the dander up of people who want to talk about separation of church and state or the First Amendment or what have you, or bigotry or anything of the sort.
But I am here to tell you, in my humble opinion, and Benjamin Netanyahu said the same thing as you just did, Jose.
Israel has become, the battle for Israel has become the battle, the most important battle in the war on terror.
And it's becoming more and more obvious.
Israel's done everything it's been asked to do.
Land for peace, give up the settlements.
Stop this, stop that.
It doesn't stop the people that make these deals break these deals because it's never been about that.
It's always been about the destruction of Israel.
And this is now undeniable to people.
The only people that don't want to admit it are people who can't afford to admit it because it would totally render them ineffective as being wrong constantly on big issues.
They're not going to admit that.
And Netanyahu said, we're the first target, but we're just that.
We're the first target.
You are next.
And he's exactly right.
And that's, folks, that's why you wonder, Rush, have you spent so many hours on this since this all started?
Like I said to you at the top of the program, when I was told after 9-11 that we were declaring war on terror, I believed it.
And I thought, good, it's necessary.
This has been going on for way too long, way too many decades, with no response at all other than piddly little court cases.
But that's not the way this is going to be won, ultimately.
Can't fight it as a criminal case.
It is what it is, and it isn't that.
And so when there are people who are willing to sabotage our victory in this war against this enemy for their own personal aggrandizement, elevation to power, or their animus toward George W. Bush, then it's frustrating, it's maddening, and it causes palpable anger in me, not just frustration, palpable anger.
But it's going to have to be dealt with at some point.
And what's happening here in Israel is such Israel cannot lose this.
Hezbollah must lose this decisively.
There can be no question.
It has to be such a clear defeat that no amount of PR or spin will change that reality.
They can put all the pictures up.
They can parade all their dead babies all they want, like they've been doing.
Babies they killed, babies they saw to it that were placed in the line of fire.
They can do that all day long, but the end of the day, the reality will be they have been defeated.
That's the message that needs to be said.
Thanks, Jose, for the phone call.
A brief time out, and he will return in earnest.
Well, I tell you what has to be some of the absolute best timing in the history of politics.
Key Democrat leaders in the House and Senate have united to call on President Bush to begin pulling U.S. troops out of Iraq by the end of the year, citing an overtaxed military, billions of dollars spent, and ongoing sectarian violence.
In a letter to Bush released on Monday, the Democrats backed to plan for the phased redeployment of troops.
It's a usual suspects.
Let's see, Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi.
Well, maybe it's just those two, but the headline says, key Democrat leaders in the House.
It's probably just two people.
Probably just two people.
The whole thing here has been portrayed as some big bunch of Democrats.
Anyway, great timing, guys.
You have really stepped in it now.
Both feet are in the quicksand.
From the Jerusalem Post, the Israeli Defense Forces assessed on Monday that the Hezbo's rocket launching capability significantly compromised by the fighting that took place in the past three weeks.
It was estimated that while the organization still has hundreds of rockets, only a number of launchers remain with launching capability.
The IDF asserted it had killed some 200 Hezboll operatives.
Most of the names are not released.
One of the more prominent targets hit was Jihad Atiyah, said to be responsible for the killing and kidnapping of IDF soldiers, Beni Evraham, Adi Avatan, and Omar Sawed in 2000.
Meanwhile, it was released for publication that an IAF UAV bombed, Israeli Air Force bombed a truck the previous night that had traveled from Syria into Lebanon on the border between the two countries.
It was unclear what the truck was carrying, but I'll guarantee you it probably was not a Mr. Softy truck.
All right, now, folks, Matt Drudge has just posted on his website with a siren, the most incredible story, and it's by John Solomon of the Associated Press.
Now, probably going to damage his career, but I've mentioned Solomon on previous occasions that Solomon seems to be a fair guy.
Solomon's stuff for AP appears to be really balanced.
The prisoners held at Club Gitmod during the war on terror have attacked their military guards hundreds of times, turning broken toilet parts, utensils, radios, and even a bloody lizard tail into makeshift weapons, Pentagon reports say.
Incident reports reviewed by the AP indicate that military police guards are routinely head-butted, spat upon, and doused by cocktails of feces, urine, vomit, and sperm collected in meal cups by the prisoners.
This exciting you, Dawn?
This is sick stuff.
They've been repeatedly grabbed, punched, or assaulted by prisoners who reached through the small bean holes used to deliver food and blankets through cell doors, the reports say.
Serious assaults requiring medical attention, however, are rare.
The detainee reached under the face mask of an IRF initial reaction force team member's helmet, scratched his face, attempting to gouge his eyes, states a May 27, 2005 report on an effort to remove a recalcitrant prisoner from his cell.
I can't wait until Dick Durbin reads this.
I can't wait.
Well, just, we'll never know what he really thinks about it.
It's going to be tough for him to, you know, he's going to, you'll have to focus on the Pentagon setting AP up, lying to AP, and so forth.
But this is clearly just the exact opposite of what we have been treated to in the drive-by media ever since Abu Ghraib and Club Gitmo became stories.
And that is that these are just innocent little people and they've been dragged away in their home countries and they're being mistreated and they're being tortured and so forth in Club Git Mo and Abu Grab and it is horrible.
And now we find out, and this is a long story.
When I printed it out, it's just a little over three pages.
Well, I know they're being confined and I know they're desperate, but they are not the harmless, lovable little fuzzballs like I am that they have been portrayed to be.
These people are human debris.
And given the chance, they would kill these guards with whatever weapons that they could manufacture, makeshift or otherwise.
Quickly, I want to go to Phil in Ontario, California.
You got one minute, Phil.
Can you do it?
Yes, Rash Megadittos from Ontario.
Thank you.
I couldn't help thinking when you and Mr. Netanyahu were speaking about how you win the hearts and minds of these people.
And it reminded me of Charlie Coulson.
He used to work with Nixon.
He summed it up, and you may have to censor this, but I'll give the exact quote.
He says, when you get them by their balls, their heart and mind soon follow.
So it goes back to what you said.
It's a no-negotiated settlement.
You either win or you lose.
That's with a street fighter in a war.
And it's just, anyway, thanks again for your good work.
Yeah, I appreciate that, Phil.
Thanks for that.
Thanks.
Brevity is the soul of wit.
That is a tactic that has been proven to work in marriage as well.
All right, what a show this has been.
This is destined not just for the Limbaugh Broadcast Museum.
This one destined for the Hall of Fame.
In fact, it's going to be tough to winnow out those that don't qualify for the Hall of Fame.
A quick timeout here, ladies and gentlemen, back in 21 hours with more broadcast excellence.
How can you win people's minds and hearts, though, if they don't have any to begin with?
▲
Export Selection