All Episodes
Previous Next
June 14, 2006 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:25
June 14, 2006, Wednesday, Hour #3
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Hi, how are you?
Oh, by the way, standby audio soundbite 18 up there.
New York, I forgot to point that out to you.
CBS, early show weather guy, was in Cape Girardo for another reason.
I guess they had some, I didn't know it, but Eva, what's her name?
Eva Braun lives in Cape Girardo, Missouri, which is my hometown.
There is an Eva Braun that lives there, and she won a contest to go to Hawaii, I guess, on a CBS early show.
So they sent a crew in there, and the crew realized that that was my hometown.
So they went out and they did a little feature.
And I have the audio for it.
It was about a four-minute piece.
And we've, well, I don't want to spend all four minutes of it, but we've pared it down to just over a minute.
Have that for you coming up.
It's the Rush Limbaugh Program and the Excellence in Broadcasting Network.
800-282-2882.
You want to hear it?
Well, why the full form of Harry Smith got a little snarky.
I didn't see it.
Kathleen was telling me that she cut it up and Harry Smith got a little snarky when the weather guy was trying to be very nice to me.
I wish she would have left this in.
They went into the barber shop where my first job was shining shoes in a barbershop and I was 13.
And apparently went to that barbershop, took a camera crew in there, and there was some old man getting his hair cut who said he thought I had died.
And for some reason, excuse me, for some reason, Kathleen cut that out.
Cookie, if you can, just go put that little snippet.
Give me about 10 seconds in front of it and 10 seconds after it or 20 seconds on both sides of it.
So there's a little context.
Because I'd like to hear that.
She described the old man as kind of snarky himself.
He was getting his haircut, not one of the barbers.
But it was the old college barbershop right there on Broadway right across from Hauk Stadium, which is where I played high school football.
Anyway, this is the weatherman Dave Price's report on Cape Girardo, Missouri.
Here there are all sorts of things to see.
Famous old St. Vincent's Church with its Renaissance-style architecture, the beautiful murals along the flood wall that hold back the mighty Mississippi River, and Rush Limbaugh's boyhood home.
Yep, America's favorite conservative was born and raised right here in Cape Girardeau.
Fans who can't get enough of Rush on his daily show can rush to Cape Girardeau and take the official Rush Limbaugh hometown tour.
Our first stop is KGMO Radio, where Rush got his start in high school.
Right there, that's Centenary United Methodist Church.
And that's where Rush went to church as a small boy.
Now, right here, this is where Rush's football career began and ended on Hauk Field.
And this historic stop on our tour is the barbershop where Rush shines shoes as a boy.
And it's a town very devoted to him as Rush is to this town.
So it was a lot of fun wandering around.
And don't forget, this is a stunning place to visit with natural beauty as well.
As soon as Kathleen finds the old man getting his hair cut in that barbershop who thought I was dead or had died, I think that's what he said.
I died.
What was that?
Well, that's it.
No, that was, they were spinning a record like these modern day hip-hop DJs do, spinning.
Whatever.
You would have seen, I'm assuming you would have seen a record being queued up.
You know, that's how you do it.
And that's what that was, as they prepared the audience for the trip up the hill to KGMO, which is where I started.
Not station I'm on now In Cape Gerardo.
But anyway, as soon as we get that clip of the old man, assuming I was dead, we'll pass that along.
Have you seen this story?
Bill Clinton raked in nearly $7.5 million in speaking fees alone last year, sometimes earned as much as $350,000 for a single appearance.
Clinton earned a staggering $650,000 for just two appearances in two days before major gatherings in Canada by motivational speaker Tony Robbins.
This is all according to financial disclosure reports filed yesterday by, no, actually today, filed today by his wife, Vice President Hillary Rodham Clinton.
As a senator, Mrs. Clinton required to report her spouse's income as well as her own.
In 2004, Bill Clinton earned just $875,000 for speeches as he recovered from heart bypass surgery.
Now two years later, $7.5 million.
Some of that's in Dubai as well.
Now, I don't have a problem with this.
I mean, these people can pay Clinton whatever they want to get him.
What I find ironic, what's the favorite word of journalists, you remember when after Ronald Reagan retired, served his first term, two terms, he went to, was it, went to, was it Japan or China?
He went to Japan.
Reagan went to Japan and got, I think, what was it, $2 million?
Something like that.
And they raised holy hell in the drive-by media.
They thought that dishonored the office of the presidency.
Why, that was just unheard of.
Plus, Reagan only spoke for like 30 minutes.
I think it was two 30-minute speeches.
He only spoke for 30 minutes, got $2 million.
Why, this crass commercialism is going to result in the loss of respect for the office of the presidency around the country.
Now, with Bill Clinton earning nearly $7.5 million, we get just factual reports undertones of, isn't this wonderful?
Certainly no mention in the story of, gosh, isn't this sort of taint?
The aura of the White House is to commercialize the post-presidential period.
Couldn't he have at least go hammered some nails like Jimmy Carter did or some such thing?
Then, at insult to injury, then Clinton will run around.
Hey, you know, I'm rich.
I'm richer than you are.
The Clintons cannot pass up any opportunity to tell you how wealthy they are.
Folks, that's a dead giveaway of no class.
If you have to tell people, it's not worth telling them.
People, it's like you have to say, I am not a prostitute.
You just said that you are.
If you've just, we're going to inject a little spirituality in our campaign here, like the Democrats said a couple weeks ago.
Well, if you have to inject it, it isn't there, is it?
If you have to ask how much something costs, you don't have the money for it.
All these clichés, founded somewhat in truth.
And yet, here's Clinton.
I'm richer than you are.
I'm making all this money now.
I don't need these tax cuts.
I don't need these tax cuts at all.
Well, if you don't need the tax cuts, then maybe you don't need the income.
Maybe you don't need this much.
You know, it's one thing to go out and demand these high prices for a speech.
You want to go out there and charge something like $350,000 for a speech and then start complaining that you're rich and you're getting a lot of tax cuts.
The money must matter is the bottom line.
Just like, where, of course, where the Clintons are concerned, they don't want you to think it does.
It's all liberals.
They want you to make you believe that money doesn't mean anything to them.
Couldn't care less about that.
They're into service.
They're into public service, improving the human condition, bonding with people.
They are as into money as anybody else, and the Clintons are at the top of the list.
Make no mistake about it.
Now, here are some of the details on the FEMA scams.
Might be better to just give you this straight-out list here.
FEMA could not establish that 750 debit cards worth $1.5 million even went to Katrina victims, the auditors said.
Among the items purchased with the cards, an all-inclusive one-week Caribbean vacation in the Punta Cana Resort in the Dominican Republic, five season tickets of New Orleans Saints pro football games, adult erotica products in Houston and Girls Gone Wild videos in Santa Monica, Dom Perignon, that's how I pronounce it, heard it pronounced ones new, Dom Perignon, champagne, and other adult beverages in San Antonio.
Another person bought a divorce lawyer's services in Houston.
The only question unanswered here is how many of them are out there voting multiple times.
The person that paid off a divorce lawyer or hired a divorce lawyer got it with $1,000.
Another evacuee spent $2,000 on five New Orleans Saints season tickets.
One person's three-month stay in a Honolulu hotel for $115 a night.
The alleged scammer also collected $2,400 in rental assistance despite living in North Carolina, not in New Orleans.
So I do not think you should be shocked by this.
This is SOP, standard operating procedure with all of these government programs.
And as I say, if you think the waste and fraud here is bad, try other established ongoing everyday for the past 50 years government programs.
You would probably be shocked.
In fact, the Food Stamp Program advertises for fraud.
They literally advertise people who don't qualify to try to come in and make them qualify somehow.
Just keep the budget levels up.
Okay, we are back.
I am Rush Limbaugh, America's real anchor man, your guiding light.
Triumes of trouble, confusion, tumult, chaos, torture, humiliation, and even the good times.
All right, we have two more sound bites from Dave Price's report on my hometown, Cape Girardeau, Missouri, today on the CBS Early Show.
He is the weatherman.
Here is the episode.
He walks into the barbershop where I shine shoes at age 13, my first job.
And this historic stop on our tour is the barbershop where Rush shines shoes as a boy.
Do you remember Rush running around town?
I didn't even know Rush Limbaugh was alive.
Do you realize you may be a special man yourself as being perhaps the only man in America who didn't know that Rush Limbaugh was alive and from Cape Girardo?
All right, and then this next one's kind of funny, too.
This is Price, and he's talking to Harry Smith.
I was following in the footsteps in this town of some of the famous haunts that Rush Limbaugh actually visited.
You know, his brother Dave is still here?
He still wanders around town?
My brother wanders.
He's like he's homeless or something.
Hey, Dave, you're cutting a wide swath in Cape Gerardo.
Still wandering around town aimlessly, hopelessly.
Where's Dave today?
Anybody seen him?
If you see him get the quarter, cost of living there is cheap.
Oh, baby.
Randy in Watertown, Massachusetts.
Welcome to the EIB Networks there.
Hello.
Yeah, hey, Rush.
This whole FEMA story is a sham by the liberals to make Bush look bad because money is fungible, which means that people get money from a FEMA credit card and they use that money to buy food, then they have other money to go to Punta Cana in the Dominican Republic.
So it's a total sham.
The story's a sham because anytime the government gives money, it frees up other money to do other things.
So the story is nothing.
Well, you know, that is an interesting point.
No, wait a minute.
In this sense, you wouldn't probably see a story on FEMA fraud if Bill Clinton were in the White House.
Absolutely.
You wouldn't see it.
Now, I don't know whether in its attempt to make Bush look bad.
I think that's a stretch.
People know that Bush wasn't handing out these cards.
Let me give you an alternative picture to deal with.
I understand your point about money is fungible.
But let's go back to the second day after Hurricane Katrina is hit.
And we've got these pictures, and we've got these stories alleging what we know now never happened.
Mayhem, murder, death, feces, urine lining the walls of the Super Bowl, dead bodies piled up in freezers with no power.
We've got a toxic soup of the floodwaters.
We've got an environmental disaster.
We've got people plunging over the sides of interstate bridges because they've lost all hope.
We've got people with no buses.
We've got no rescue.
We got no air conditioning.
We've got mosquitoes flying around.
It's horrible.
It's the end of time.
And FEMA announces, here's how we're going to pass out the relief aid.
You show up at our office, tell us what you need, and we will buy it for you.
You head off to the store, pick it up, but we're not going to give you any money whatsoever because we don't trust you.
You know what would happen?
You'd have people like Anderson Cooper, Geraldo, down there inside of 30 seconds doing television stories on the cruelty, the lack of haste, the laziness on the part of the government.
Why, just give them the credit card.
Just give them the money.
Look at these people.
They are dying.
They are sweating.
They are thirsty.
The only thing that you can do in these circumstances is start handing out the money.
Just get this because you have to demonstrate you're moving fast that you care and that you're going to do what you can to help these people.
And you don't have time to check to see if who's in line was actually a victim.
You just pass out the money.
Give them the credit card.
Don't check it because if you start checking, it would have taken six months if we could have done it in that length of time.
So this is one of those damned if you do, damned if you don't circumstances.
Story's totally bogus.
Money's fungible.
Well, what do you mean money is fungible?
Here's what I mean.
I mean, I know what I know, but relate it to this.
What do you mean by saying that?
If people use the FEMA credit card to get money to buy food or shelter or other things, then it frees up other money they have to get sex change operations or go to Dominican Republic.
That happens all the time.
I know what you're saying.
You're essentially saying that because the money is being spent on goods and services that people are benefiting from, it doesn't matter.
You're taking the morality out of it.
You're simply saying, giving them the money.
It's good for the economy.
There's money changing hands.
Money's fungible.
The money is not fraudulent.
The way it's being spent is not fraudulent because people are spending.
Are benefiting on both sides of the spending, the spender and the recipient.
And Rush, if they qualify for the money, if they qualify, then they get the money and they can do what they want with it.
Yeah, but we're talking about people who didn't qualify for it.
See, now you put the moral component.
Let me explain to you why people, when they initially hear this, are outraged by it.
The whole point of this was to relieve people of their suffering directly related to the hurricane, and that's housing and clothing, you know, things that they lost.
When we hear people going out and buying Dom Parignon or vacations in the Dominican Republic or five New Orleans Saints Super Bowl tickets, well, do you throw that out because that's an investment in a town coming back, you could say.
But either that or a triumph of emotion over common sense buying Saints tickets.
But throw that out.
But you'd have to throw the morality out in order to make your point.
What people look at, say, Mike, we're not, I'm a taxpayer, and I'll be glad to help people out if they've lost food and shelter and need clothes.
But I'll be damned if I'm going to sit there.
I wouldn't give them a dime to go out and buy Girls Gone Wild videos, and yet my government's doing it for me, and that's what makes them mad.
But Rush, the point of the story that makes it news is not merely the fact that they don't qualify or qualify, because that's always going to happen in a certain percentage of cases.
The reason they make it the story is, oh, it was spent on things that were not related to necessity.
That aspect of the story is totally bogus because money's fungible.
If you have it in the first place, it is.
But when somebody gives you money for the specific purpose of helping you through and recover from a tragedy over which because you don't have money, then of course, it is thought.
I think it's naive, but people assume that the money is going to be spent responsibly to replace those things, the necessities in life.
We're not buying people's desires here.
We're buying needs.
We're providing them money for their needs.
They're going out and saying, screw my needs.
I'll find a way to bum those from somebody else.
I'm going to take this cash and I'm going to get what I've never had.
I'm going to have some Dom Perignon and then I'm going to go down to the Dominican Republic and I'm going to buy some Saints tickets and I'm going to finally go see what a Girls Gone Wild video is.
And that's what gets people upset about it.
Well, and that's what happens anytime the government gives money like that.
Well, that's my point.
You can't stop this.
Because if a certain percentage of humanity is going to be, you know, human debris.
And that's why it's not.
They're going to be scam artists.
That's why it's a non-story, other than they're trying to make Bush look bad somehow.
Well, how about the motivation?
You may have a point on that.
I think it may be an attack on the whole Bush government bureaucracy and so forth, but I don't think the people writing the story in a drive-by media care, but I just, I'll bet this story wouldn't be written, had been written, had been president.
He may have a point on that.
Anyway, we got to go here.
Back in just a second.
A man, a legend, a way of life.
Learn it.
Love it.
Live it.
Rush Limbaugh, known in many circles as the most dangerous man in America.
Well, a bunch of immigration activity out there.
Swarm of federal immigration agents sped silently, headlights off, down a Boston side street early today and surrounded an apartment house.
Moments later, agents led a dazed-looking Jose Ferreira de Silva, 35, out in handcuffs.
The Brazilian had been arrested in 2002 and deported, but had slipped back into the country.
Now faces up 20 years in prison.
In a blitz that began May 26th, ICE officials have arrested nearly 2,100 illegal immigrants across the country.
Officials said the raids are aimed at child molesters, gang members, and other violent criminals, as well as people like DeSilva, who sneaked back into the country after Judge threw him out.
And an immigration raid at Dulles International Airport resulted in 55 arrests today.
The people were doing contract work at a construction site inside a secure area where they would potentially have access to runways and airplanes.
ICE agents made their move as the workers are being bussed to the site, checking work and immigration papers.
The agency says one of the workers had an airport security badge that grants unescorted access to the airport tarmac.
So apparently it can be done.
Brian in Troy, New York, I'm glad you waited, sir.
Welcome to the EIB network.
Thank you, Mr. Boss.
Yes, sir.
A while ago, I heard you talked about Democrats and war, and I took offense.
I'm a veteran, Democrat.
Some questions I have for you: nine out of ten Iraqi and Afghanistan vets that are going to run for House or Senate are running on the Democratic line.
In the House and Senate today, veterans are represented by Democrats at a two-to-one ratio over Republicans.
And even amongst Republicans, Lindsey Graham and John McCain, when it comes to matters of war, are almost Democrats.
So, how can you beat up on Democrats for that?
Well, let me explain this.
We're going to start with this.
Number one, I do not automatically accept your figures on nine out of ten who are running or running on the Democratic side, and the vast majority of veterans are Democrats and so forth.
But I'm not talking about vets, I'm not talking about soldiers.
Don't be absurd here if you're going to ask me and talk about Dems not supporting the war.
I'm talking about prominent elected Democrats in Washington, and I've played the clips.
I'm just repeating what they say.
It is inescapable.
There is an ongoing effort to sabotage victory in this war over this enemy, Al-Qaeda.
There is an ongoing effort to do it.
The cut-and-run crowd, the people that want to get out.
Now, they couch it in: we've got to protect our troops.
Well, the troops don't sign up for protection.
Troops sign up knowing full, especially now, sign up knowing what they're getting into.
That's what's so remarkable about all of you who do it.
But to say that McCain and Graham sound like Democrats on the war, that's the one area McCain doesn't sound like a Democrat.
It's the one area where he doesn't sound like he's trying to curry favor with the drive-by media.
I mean, it's absurd to dispute this.
It's ridiculous to dispute it.
The Democrats are obsessed with getting out of there.
They're not obsessed with winning it.
They're not concerned with winning it.
They've got us already defeated.
They think we're humiliated.
Our reputation in the world is ruined.
Our image around the world is ruined.
We've got to get out.
Oh, bring our boys home.
This is bad news.
We can't win it to civil war, blah, blah, blah.
Meanwhile, we just keep moving the ball forward and chalking up victories.
And what they're doing is not contributing to morale at all.
Did you people?
I didn't talk about this, but it was clearly big news.
The report of how many murders there were in the country last year, what was that number?
I'm convinced either 47,000 or 87,000.
It was in the story about crime being up after five years of violent crime going down.
And I remember reading that article.
And, you know, the first thing, the first thing that struck me, here are the Democrats all concerned about life.
They're all concerned about death.
And they're all concerned about the troops.
And they've been counting up along with the drive-by media.
From the moment we had a thousand battlefield deaths, then the number was 15, and then it was 2,000.
And there was an eager panting before we reached each of these round numbers.
2,000 deaths of the rock.
Ring the bells.
Run the presses.
Get on the air.
2,000 battlefield deaths of the rock.
2,000 battlefields.
And then it got to 2,500.
They did the same thing.
As though this is unacceptable, unheard of.
Why?
Outrageous.
Why we're getting our troops killed.
And then I saw the report of the number of murders in this country.
The number of murders in this country is higher than the number of people killed in traffic accidents in this country.
Murders.
It's either we're looking it up now, but I think the number was around either 47 or 87,000 murders.
And we've got a political party all concerned about 2,500 deaths.
It's like I said earlier, they have this selective application of compassion.
Like 24 citizens in Haditha allegedly massacred by U.S. troops.
And all of a sudden, why that's unconscious?
Why, 24 dead Iraqis, why this is worse than Saddam.
We're going to stop this.
This is horrible.
We're going to put these Marines in jail.
We're going to find out what they did.
We're going to put them in the dock.
And yet they never cared about the 300,000 Iraqis that Saddam killed in his tenure.
Didn't care a whit.
Would never have been a reason to go in and stop this tyrant from doing it.
All of a sudden, 24 Iraqis allegedly killed in a massacre.
Well, that gives them the opportunity to blame the U.S. military, Brian.
And that's what the Democratic Party today revels in doing.
Any chance they can blame the military, any chance we killed Zarkowi, they said it was meaningless.
Don't try to tell me that the Democrats care about this.
Well, they care about it, but not the same way most Americans do.
Most Americans understand that a war is a war, and they understand that until the full details of Hadith are known, not going to rush to any kind of conclusion on this.
Democrats in the drive-by media already have 2,500 deaths on the battlefield in Iraq.
Get them out.
Put them in Kuwait.
Hit them out of there.
This is horrible.
87,000 murders in the United States.
We don't even hear a word about it.
In fact, most of these cases, the drive-by media Democrats will be sympathetic to the killer.
Well, what were the socioeconomic circumstances?
You know, it could be America's fault that people do bad things because America is an evil country.
I'm going to tell you something, Brian.
I'm going to hit you right between the eyes.
I'm talking about people who hate this country.
And there are people in the drive-by media that hate this country.
It is time to stop glossing over this and play a ring around the Rosie.
There are American haters in a Democrat Party.
There are America haters in a drive-by media.
It's hard to accept.
It's hard to explain, but they're there.
It forms or derives from guilt.
It derives from the fact that they're liberals and they hate capitalism and they hate prosperity and they hate the inequality of life in America or what have you.
It's sick.
It's maddening and infuriating.
But you don't find American haters on the right.
And you don't find a hate America crowd on the Republican Party.
And you don't find a hate America contingent in the so-called new media made up of conservatives.
It's just the opposite.
But there's a bunch of America haters out there.
They are prominent.
They are in the drive-by media.
And they're doing everything they can to undermine this country.
Particularly, they hate this country when a Republican is president and Republicans are running the Congress.
Nice try, however.
Savannah, Georgia.
And Gene, you're next on the EIB network.
Hello.
Hi.
It's quite an honor to talk to you.
I've been trying for years to get in touch with you, but I was able to get through today.
Well, I'm glad you made it and welcome.
Well, thank you.
I just wanted to comment on the caller that said that nine out of ten of the people that he knows in the military are Democrats.
Yeah.
I spent 23 years in the Air Force.
I met maybe four Democrats in that amount of time.
And thinking back, I think all of them are under the rank of E3.
Well, look, when I went to Afghanistan, I took a troop visit to Afghanistan a year ago, February.
What is that?
Almost a year and a half ago.
And there were some Democrats in the troops.
They were there.
They weren't anywhere near a majority, but there was a sizable number of them at various bases in Afghanistan.
But I'm not, if anybody's going to make the assumption that I am talking about uniformed volunteers as Democrats who are trying to sabotage the war effort, I refuse to accept that there are people that stupid in this audience, and I would have to stoop that low to explain.
By the way, I'm not talking about uniformed military personnel, especially in the context of discussing what we're hearing from people like John Kerry and Howard Dean and Jack Murtha and Nancy Pelosi and all the rest of this cabal that's doing its best to undermine this particular war on this particular enemy.
Got to go.
Appreciate the call out there, Gene.
We'll be back.
Not looking good for Al Gore.
There's a great piece today at the Canada Free Press by a man named Tom Harris.
He's gone out and talked to some scientists who have no connection with corporations or governments.
They're not part of government grants and whatever.
And they've asked these, he asked these scientists to assess Al Gore's stupid, idiotic movie, An Inconvenient Truth.
And some of the answers he got are very interesting.
Murder over 16,900?
16,900 last year, 16,900.
Well, that's not more than the traffic deaths because that's around 47,000.
But let's add them together.
But even 16,900, let's call it 17,000 in one year, 2,500 in three years in Iraq.
It's just all so focused, folks.
Frankly, I'm getting fed up with it.
We'll be back.
All right.
www.canadafreepress.com.
Billed is Canada's fastest-growing independent news source.
A piece here by Tom Harris, guest column, scientists respond to Gore's warnings of climate catastrophe.
The inconvenient truth is indeed inconvenient to alarmists.
Scientists have an independent obligation to respect and present the truth as they see it.
Al Gore sensibly absurds or asserts in his stupid movie, An Inconvenient Truth, showing it Cumbledon Forest Cinemas.
Professor Bob Carter of the Marine Geophysical Laboratory at James Cook University in Australia gives what, for many Canadians, is a surprising assessment.
Quote, Gore's circumstantial arguments are so weak that they are pathetic.
It is simply incredible that they and his idiotic movie are commanding public attention.
He didn't say idiotic.
I threw it in there because I frankly can't help myself today.
But surely Carter is merely part of what most people regard as a tiny cadre of climate change skeptics who disagree with the vast majority of scientists that Gore cites.
No, Carter is one of hundreds of highly qualified non-governmental, non-industry, non-lobby group climate experts who contest the hypothesis that human emissions of carbon dioxide, CO2, are causing significant global climate change.
Climate experts is the operative term here.
Why?
Because what Gore's majority of scientists think is immaterial when only a very small fraction of them actually work in the climate field.
Even among that fraction, many focus their studies on the impacts of climate change.
Biologists, for example, who study everything from insects to polar bears to poison ivy.
While many are highly skilled researchers, they generally do not have special knowledge about the cause of global climate change, explains former University of Winnipeg professor Dr. Tim Ball.
They usually can tell us only about the effects of changes in the local environment where they conduct their studies.
This is highly valuable knowledge, but it doesn't make them climate change experts, only climate impact experts.
So we have even a smaller fraction.
But it becomes smaller still.
Among experts who actually examine the causes of change on a global scale, many concentrate their research on designing and enhancing computer models of hypothetical futures.
These models have been consistently wrong in all their scenarios, asserts Ball.
Since modelers concede computer outputs are not predictions, but are, in fact, merely scenarios, they are negligent in letting policymakers and the public think that they're actually making forecasts.
We should listen most to scientists who use real data to try to understand what nature is actually telling us about the causes and extent of global climate change.
Can we agree on something, folks?
Something simple and axiomatic.
At any moment in time, the Earth is either warming or cooling.
We know for a fact that that's the case.
We know for a fact because we've had ice ages and we've had boiling volcanoes.
The Earth is either cooling or warming at any given time.
How long am I going to keep doing this before the country realizes these people are a bunch of charlatans?
I've been on this for 12 years and I'm getting impatient.
I'll have to keep it up as long as the other side keeps putting out bogus BS.
Here is a small sample of the side of the debate that we almost never hear.
Appearing before the Commons Committee on Environment and Sustainable Development last year, Carleton University paleoclimatologist Professor Tim Patterson testified, quote, there is no meaningful correlation between CO2 levels and Earth's temperature over this geologic timeframe.
In fact, when CO2 levels were over 10 times higher than they are now, about 450 million years ago, the planet was in the depths of the absolute coldest period in the last half billion years.
Patterson asked the committee, on the basis of this evidence, how could anyone still believe that the recent relatively small increase in CO2 levels would be the major cause of the past century's modest warming?
Patterson concluded his testimony by explaining what his research and hundreds of other studies reveal.
On all time scales, there is very good correlation between Earth's temperature and natural celestial phenomena, such as changes in the brightness of the sun.
No.
Why, ladies and gentlemen, I myself am not a scientist, and yet I have a reasonable amount of intelligence, common sense, a fair education.
And even I, someone unsophisticated, not an elitist, not Ivy League born, bred, or educated, can be led to understand that activities on the sun might have a greater impact on temperatures here than any other damn thing that might be happening on this planet.
We found a picture of my brother David wandering streets of my hometown, Cape Girardeau, Missouri.
It'll be on the website rushlimbo.com as we update it to reflect the contents of this program later this afternoon.
It's been great, folks.
Another great day with you, and tomorrow more of the same.
See you then.
▲
Export Selection