All Episodes
Previous Next
June 8, 2006 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:32
June 8, 2006, Thursday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Remember, my good friends, always keep the faith and always remain confident, particularly of the United States military when under the command of George W. Bush.
You don't need to lose faith in that.
Today is just more evidence.
Greetings.
It's great to have you with us.
Broadcast Excellence continues from the acclaimed and prestigious Limbaugh Institute for Advanced Conservative Studies.
I, of course, am the head honcho sitting in the prestigious Till of the Hun chair here at the Distinguished Institute.
Looking forward to speaking to you.
800-282-2882.
If you'd like to be on the program, the email address, rush at EIBnet.com.
Now, I do want to move on to other things.
There are other juicy, classic things out there today, in addition to this.
Look, if you watch the Drive-By Me, they're still running their graphics.
It's breaking news.
This news broke at 3.08 to 3.30 this morning.
That's when the news first hit.
It's 10 hours later.
It's breaking news out there.
And this is how the drive-bys work.
It's one issue and one issue at a time.
They'll go with this for a while.
And then they'll move on.
I'm going to move on quite soon here.
We'll take your phone calls on this.
It doesn't mean you have to hang up.
If you still want to weigh in on this, feel free to do so.
We have some more examples of what's being posted at Kook Fringe Democrat blogs like Daily Cause, Daily Chaos.
Here's just a sample.
Bush's idea of justice is bombs falling out of the sky.
Why is he dead again just now?
I wonder if Carl's getting indicted tomorrow.
Those pics of Abu Zukab look like they just thawed him out just in time for the elections.
Zarkawi was quite probably a psyops job in the first place.
So what does that make his death?
Keep your eyes on the prize, Haditha.
Just in time to hide the fact that they're trying to cut the estate tax for the uber wealthy.
Yes, the timing of Zarkawi's death does seem too good for Bush to be true.
It reeks of distraction politics.
I can't you not.
Have you wondered why there hasn't been any slaps on the back?
There haven't been any slaps on the back from liberal Democrats for the military.
I mean, you've had a glam thing blow, if you will.
Great, great job.
It's a tremendous successful mission.
But you haven't had any Democrat do what the president did today, which was, in fact, I'm going to have you grab the audio soundbite of that, Mark.
Or Mike.
See, audio soundbite number six.
You haven't heard a Democrat come close to saying this.
I'll tell you why in just a second.
The operation against Zarkawi was conducted with courage and professionalism by the finest military in the world.
Yep.
Coalition and Iraqi forces persevered through years of near-misses and false leads.
Radon, Rado.
And they never gave up.
Radon.
On behalf of all Americans.
Radon.
I congratulate our troops on this remarkable achievement.
Radon.
Zarkawi is dead.
Yes.
But the difficult and necessary mission in Iraq continues.
Radon.
We can expect the terrorists and insurgents to carry on without him.
Zarkawi's death is a severe blow to Al-Qaeda.
Amen, brother.
It's a victory in the global war on terror.
Amen.
And it is an opportunity for Iraq's new government to turn the tide of this struggle.
Radon, Rado.
Now, at the very beginning of that, courage, professionalism of the finest military in the world.
Why won't you not hear a lib Democrat say that today or tomorrow or next year?
Because these kooks that we are finding on these blogs would go ballistic.
They would go ballistic.
The elected Democrats in Washington are almost captive to the kook fringe that now claim to be their base.
If they go out and start praising the men and women of the military, finest fighting force block, there will be hell to pay on the part of anybody who says it.
And if some Democrat who happens to be running for president got close to saying anything like that, the other Democratic contenders would jump all over him or her, whoever it might be.
Now, ladies and gentlemen, I, of course, have a trained eye.
I can read the stitches.
I can see the stitches on a fastball.
I can read between the lines.
One of the things that I have noticed and pointed out to you quite frequently is how similar talking points, say, from Saddam's defense team and talking points to the Democratic Party against Bush sound so similar and familiar that it's dangerous.
It's actually appalling.
Today, there is a story in the New York Times by Adam Nag Gourney.
And Mr. Nag Gourney is writing about the elections on Tuesday.
And this story contains a statement by Rah Emmanuel, who, by the way, took a huge hit, not in California 50.
I forget that Robert Novak wrote about it.
Emmanuel runs a Democrat Congressional Campaign Committee and is getting praised to the, you know, used to be one of Clinton's henchmen.
And he'd been praised to the hilt for this great job he's doing out there running the DCCC.
Well, his chosen candidate, the Democrat Party's chosen candidate in some Democrat primaries, some districts somewhere, lost.
And it was a resounding defeat.
And it was the first rebuke, shall we say, of Emmanuel.
Anyway, in this Adam Nagourney story about the elections on Tuesday, the statement from Emmanuel about California 50 sounds so similar to what Al Jazeera and Al-Qaeda are saying today about Zarkawi that it is funny.
I'll get to that here in just a second.
And I dare say that there is nobody else in the media who would read a New York Times story about the elections on Tuesday and find similarities to the statement of Al-Qaeda and others in Iraq friendly to Zarkawi today, but me.
I doubt I'm the only one astute enough and with the instincts enough to be able to do this.
Here goes.
Narrow victory by GOP signals fall problems.
Where have we heard this?
This is a New York Times story published today.
That was the spin yesterday from many Democrats.
The victory that Republicans squeezed out in a high-profile race to fill a congressional vacancy in San Diego eased party anxieties Wednesday, but signaled future difficulties as they confront tougher Democratic challenges in increasingly contested districts this fall.
Mr. Billbray's failure to break 50% was striking.
No, it wasn't, asked Adam Nagourney, because there were two other conservatives on the candidate.
If you add their vote totals, you get over 55%.
It was not striking at all.
But if the outcome was worrisome to Republicans as they battle to hold the control of the House, it was also a clear disappointment for Democrats.
So you see, a Republican victory signals bad news for the Republican Party.
A Republican victory is begrudgingly a clear disappointment for Democrats.
Now, here is Mr. Emmanuel.
Rahm Emmanuel in an interview said, yeah, the Republicans had to spend $5 million and the dominant message of immigration to break our message of change.
It tells you how potent that message is.
Not every district is going to be on the border of Mexico.
Mr. Emmanuel, you can think your message of change carried any weight out there, but if you want to know what was the determining factor in California 50, it was immigration and then immigration and then immigration.
And if you think that immigration and immigration and immigration only count in districts close to the Mexican border, then you are sadly incompetent and doing an inept job as chairman of the DCC, DCCC, not to be confused with the CCCP of the old Soviet Union.
Now, here's the statement.
And when I share this with you and then contrast it here to this statement from Al-Qaeda, you will understand and see the similarities.
The Republicans had to spend $5 million, the dominant message of immigration, to break our message of change.
It tells you how potent that message is.
Not every district's going to be on the border of Mexico.
We're not going away.
This didn't amount to anything.
This doesn't count.
Why, we would have beaten them if.
Al-Qaeda, we want to give you the joyous news of the martyrdom of the Mujahid Sheikh Abu Musabal-Zarqawi.
The death of our leader is life for us.
It'll only increase our persistence in continuing holy wars so that the world of God will be supreme.
So Al-Qaeda loses.
They say it's a victory.
In fact, it's a huge victory.
The death of our leaders is life for us.
Emmanuel, you think you won, but you didn't.
We did.
And if you're fooling yourself into thinking you won, ha ha, wait till we come at you again.
Now, I don't, this is not intentional because Emmanuel said this long before Zarkawi assumed room temperature.
I just find it striking how similar the thinking and the attitudes are about this country between our enemies and some in the Democratic Party and many on the left in this country.
Back in just a second.
All right, we'll go to the phones.
People have been patiently waiting.
By the way, day eight and all's quiet out there on hurricane season, ladies and gentlemen.
Day eight, despite the fact Americans are braced for countless hurricanes to wipe us out, destroy us, and who kind of thinks global warming.
Day eight, all quiet.
That means, by the way, that the drive-by media has to come up with something else to scare us since there hasn't been a hurricane.
And I've got a headline here for you.
Midwest earthquake could cost $60 billion, says the Risk Management Solutions Company on Wednesday.
So the crisis that isn't must always be promised to be right on the horizon.
And since hurricanes refuse to be taunted by me and Rev Up, since hurricanes have refused to form this early, pleasing the drive-by media, they have to come up with something to frighten everybody about.
Now it's earthquakes in the middle of the country.
Mike in Woodhaven, Michigan, I'm glad you waited.
I really appreciate your patience.
You are up, sir.
Welcome.
Well, thank you.
It's an honor to get to make some points.
And I loved your comedy routine earlier where we're not supposed to rejoice in your sarcasm about it.
Well, I hope that every member of the United States military has a little bit better spring in their step today.
And I know that I am rejoicing that that bicuspid, for lack of a better word, or at least that's a word I can use on the air, is no longer with us.
But another point is a cartoon that I saw the other day.
It said the punchline was we've gotten 102 al-Qaeda number twos.
Well, we got a number one now.
And the libs have to be backstepping a little bit.
But also, Ann Coltzer ripping into the lib media and their tactics using victims wherein you can't respond.
And she has just taken that away from them with a vengeance.
And you just reminded me, you're talking about the hurricane.
A talk show in Toledo, Ohio, WSPD, a station that you're on, made the point that in Iraq, there's like 25 violent deaths per 100,000 people.
In New Orleans, before Katrina hit, there was 50 violent deaths.
Mike, I hate to disappoint you.
You did that two weeks ago on this program.
No, I thank you.
I'm just, hey, I'm going to stand up for myself out here.
If you're going to talk about what you're hearing somewhere else, I'm going to tell you who was the source for it.
That's why I say I am show prep for the rest of the media.
It's true.
The most dangerous place to live in the world was not New Orleans.
What was it?
The most dangerous place.
Oh, it's Jamaica.
The number of deaths per 100,000 in the world highest is Jamaica.
Iraq is at the low end of that scale.
Yes, it's true.
The libs have been running around saying, where's Bin Laden?
You haven't captured bin Laden.
You haven't captured Zarqawi.
All you're getting is a bunch of number twos.
I'm telling you, when the news first reached the American left today, there was cussing, swearing, damn it, lumps in the throat.
What are we going to do now?
And if you go to the right places on the web, you can have a great jolly laugh over it.
Lewis in Clearwater, Florida.
Hi, and welcome to the EIB Network.
Hello.
Hi, how are you doing, Rush?
Good, sir.
Thank you.
Hey, Omega Dittos from Storm Bracing Florida.
So I wanted to comment on something that you'd mentioned at the beginning of the first hour about Nick Berg's father and those statistics he was giving about 30,000 a year died under Hussein and 50,000 a year under Bush.
Yeah, well, that's shameful manipulation of math.
I can unmanipulate that.
Just multiply the number of years Hussein has been in power and the few short years we've been at war.
And you'll see it's grossly underreported as far as.
You know why I didn't respond to that?
Because that was the least intelligent thing that was said in the whole comment that he made.
I mean, the idea to compare Bush to Saddam is patently ridiculous.
As I said, I understand this man lost his son and people, well, Rush, why don't you cut the guy some slack?
Well, look, he's inserted himself here in the political process now.
Well, I'm not sure.
I have a Mr. Sterling's.
Hey, is there okay?
Yeah, he is.
He's running for office in Pennsylvania now, a Green Party candidate.
So at any rate, I mean, to compare the deaths there under Saddam and Bush.
I mean, to do that, you have to accept the fact that Bush is a rapist, a torture, and a murderer.
And that was his point.
It was silly to even refute that.
Anybody with half a brain knows it.
And if people listening to this program don't understand that, then it's not worth the time to correct them.
It's so obvious.
Here's Dan in Dunmore, Pennsylvania.
Welcome, sir.
Nice to have you with us.
Oh, Rush, Dittos from the home of 10-year Miami Dolphins Center Tim Revy.
Thank you, sir.
I'd like to say, when you were speaking at karma earlier, I wanted to tell you that what better karma is there than the fact that Zarcawi was involved in the planning of the USS coal bombing, supposedly, and today, of all days, the USS Coal was put back in service today.
Yeah, there's a lot of karma going on out there.
The day that the Iraqi government officially formed and picked ministers, the guy who is doing his best to defeat that government is killed.
And Rumsfeld made that point today, by the way.
Rumsfeld's over in Brussels and made that point.
I think its choice as well.
Let's see.
Oh, Watana, Minnesota.
Todd, welcome to the program, sir.
Nice to have you.
Thank you for having me on, Rush.
I just wanted to report in.
It's been a couple months since you switched over to KTLK here in my area.
And as of yet, I've had no decreased desire to cut my hair, no increased desire to smoke pot, and as I know of, so far, no maggot infestations.
I'm happy to hear this.
What is referring to?
We've moved to an FM station in Minneapolis, and he's being a little sarcastic out there, aren't you?
On the fact that I refer to FM listeners as long-haired, maggot-infested, dope-smoking FM types.
Well, just a little bit, yes.
Yeah.
Are you long-haired?
I used to be.
Used to be.
And you're not growing it out now since you tuned back into FM?
No, in fact, I need to make an appointment here pretty soon, but I am keeping my hair short.
Well, okay.
Everybody, even on this glorious day, there are still people that want to prove the host wrong.
It's such an honor, I guess, for people to be able to notch their belt and say, you know, Limbaugh was wrong about something.
It doesn't happen much.
And so he's letting me know that even though he's listening to FM again, his hair is not growing long, and he has no deep desire to start smoking pot.
We have another story in the news.
This is from MSNBC.
It's where a lot of these are appearing.
Newsweek, MSNBC, some rank-and-file Democrats fear Clinton bid.
Activists express doubt about whether the senator should be the party's nominee.
Recent interviews with dozens of active Democrats in Iowa and New Hampshire, the states that hold the first caucus in primary of 2008, reveal that many party members who vote in those early contests don't want Clinton as their nominee.
These politically active Democrats voice a sense of resignation, verging on fatalism, about a Clinton run for the nomination.
They hope that she stays in the Senate.
You know, she has to probably laugh at this.
I don't know how disconcerting it is to her or her husband to read all this, but you know what their likely reaction is?
You guys can think what you want.
You can hope what you want.
But I am Hillary Clinton, and I'm going to damn well do what I please because I have all the money.
I have raised all the money.
And those Nambi-Pamby wimps you hope get the nomination think and win easier than I can are not going to get much because I'm scooping it all up.
Back after this, stay with us.
Learn that, love that, and live that.
It's possible to do five days a week on the EIB network.
As I, Rush Limbaugh, prepare the media for the rest of the busy broadcast day following this program.
A couple of other stories.
Both of these, I think, are Reuters, and that doesn't surprise me.
Headline: Iraq oil still at risk after Zawkawi's death.
Negative, obviously.
The death of Iraq's al-Qaeda leader will not bring more security to the vital oil sector in the country, where political instability and violence will continue to hamper exports and investments, analysts said.
Oil prices fell more than a dollar to below $70 after Iraq announced on Thursday that Zarkawi had been killed.
But Iraq's failure to return oil exports to pre-war levels due to violence and mismanagement has fueled crude price rally.
Really?
So now it's what it's our failure, quote-unquote, in Iraq that has led to the rising oil price.
Just have to go out there.
Just have to find the negative.
Here's negative number two.
The killing of Abu Musab al-Zarkawi removes the man who took Iraq's insurgency to new heights of savagery, but it also creates a martyr whose inspiration will mobilize new recruits.
We hope.
God, I hope the insurgency keeps going, Reuters in the drive-by media says.
Because after all, the United States has already lost the war.
We have already announced that.
We got to get troops out of there.
Arab and Western security analysts were agreed on Thursday that Zarkawi's death would not end the insurgency, even if it represents a rare triumph in Iraq for the Bush administration.
There will be people that'll be mobilized to join the caravan of martyrs to emulate his example, to honor him, said Magnus Randstorp, an al-Qaeda expert at the Swedish National Defense College.
But it does eliminate a supremely ruthless commander pursuing an explicit strategy of fomenting strife between Sunnis and majority Shias.
The U.S. helped to build up Zarkawi's aura even before the invasion of Iraq, when Secretary of State Colin Powell told a UN he was part of a sinister nexus between Iraq and it's even our fault that there was a Zarkawa.
You know, it's journalistic malpractice.
It really is his journalistic malpractice.
Bin Laden propelled him, he propelled himself, and the U.S. helped him in this endeavor.
He's now a martyr.
He was always going to be a martyr.
He was larger than life.
Again, that was uttered by Magnus Randstorp, an al-Qaeda expert at the Swedish National Defense College.
So we have just created more terrorists here.
We've just destroyed our image further in the eyes of the world, folks.
We've made a martyr in this guy.
We're going to go out and make more terrorists.
People are going to be clamoring to get on board.
The dirty little secret is that Zarkowi was compromised by his own supporters.
The dirty little secret for you.
I'm sorry, folks.
They just make me so, man.
I'm sorry.
I tried to hit the dump button and I discovered I don't have one here.
I only have a Didle, which only works when we're on the phones.
But at any rate, the dirty little secret is that all of these so-called experts do not get it.
Zarkowi was turned in by his own people.
There were defectors in his ranks.
Stop laughing in there.
That wasn't funny.
I don't like offending people with slips of the tongue.
I really do apologize for that, folks.
I know this will be a major scandal at various places on the World Wide Web, but it's just, it's incredible.
The news is rampant now with information of how great a security operation this was, an intelligence operation this was.
Cynthia in St. Louis, welcome to the pro.
Cynthia, do you happen to know Jessica in Sunset Hills?
No, I sure don't, Rod.
Okay, all right.
Sorry, I just thought I'd ask St. Louis.
It's a pretty large town.
I knew it was a roll of the dice.
Well, maybe we'll have the opportunity to meet when the earthquake hits and we might end up in the same disaster.
Could be into the same crevice, yes.
The reason that I called Rush is that I found your analysis on Zarkowi and Emmanuel to be fascinating because in my mind, what it illustrates is not so much that they share the same philosophy, but that they share the same sickness, which is insanity.
They have an absolute inability to wrap their minds around the facts and see the world for what is really going on around them.
They live in a fantasy world.
Very well said.
Not only unfit to lead, but dangerous.
And thank you so much for everything, Rush.
Very, well, that's very kind.
Really, I appreciate that because I, you know, I did it with those two unrelated stories, one the California election, District 50, and this Emmanuel statement about that, and then Al-Qaeda's statement on Zarkawi's death.
And you're absolutely right.
It's an alternative universe they both created for themselves, particularly the Democrats.
I mean, these people are so devoid of being grounded in reality that it's humorous to watch it and consider themselves victors.
And of course, I think one of the things, Cynthia, that helps this along, and I don't, it's a chicken or egg question, but is it the drive-by media and their incessant polling and their reporting of news as they hope it turns out that makes the Democrats think that those things are going to happen?
Or is it the Democrats and the way they leak and talk and inform the reporters of the drive-by media that cause the drive-by media to reflect what Democrats think?
I don't know which it is.
Are you speaking to me?
Yeah, I'm asking what your thought is.
I believe it's the chicken and the egg.
It's the blind leading the blind.
They're all crazy.
You know, Rush, I discount everything that any of them say.
I figure if their mouths are moving, they're lying.
If they're breathing, they're lying.
And if it wasn't, if it didn't have such an impact on so many of the non-thinking masses, it would be laughable.
But to me, in my mind, it's all treason.
It's not funny at all.
Well, I appreciate that.
Thanks so much for the call.
I don't want to pat myself on the back.
As you people all know, I'm really reluctant to talk about myself much at all on this program.
But just 20 years ago, the reporting coming out of California 50 and the reporting on Iraq would not be challenged anywhere.
20 years ago, what we're seeing on drive-by media reports, New York Times, Washington Post, wherever, would be the verdict on the events of the day.
And that was it.
At least in the national media.
I mean, you had little pockmarks out there that were reacting to it, but not on the same playing field.
Today, they don't have that monopoly.
They cannot construct the scenario that they wish to be the case.
And that's what I don't think they realize yet.
I think they're in a serious case of denial about their own reality, much less the reality outside their world.
And their own reality is they still have that power.
They still are the dominant, movable, influential force for public opinion.
I think that's why they're running so damn many polls, to tell you the truth.
Seems like every day there's a new tracking poll on Bush's approval or the opinion of the people to war in Iraq or what have you.
The Democrats have birthright to power.
They held it for 40 years.
They just haven't come to grips with the fact that they've lost it.
They think it's been stolen from them.
I think it's been taken from them unfairly, hanging Chad's voting machines, Ken Blackwell denying.
Oh, and guess who joined that rant today?
New York Times.
New York Times has an editorial echoing Robert Kennedy.
Don't quote him.
I'm telling you that I'm not kidding.
I've got it here in a stack.
New York Times and an editorial on how Ken Blackwell is the culprit in Ohio and he must be stopped and blah, blah, blah.
Was what Robert Kennedy's piece, Robert Kennedy Jr. in what was it, Rolling Stone was, in my opinion, really targeted at, was Ken Blackwell.
And it's all about they just can't accept that they are no longer a monopoly or that they are even losers or a minority.
And so they've constructed this reality where they still have the power they used to have.
They still have the ability to wield it and exercise it.
But then certain things come along and slap them upside the head like two Supreme Court nominations they can't stop.
A war at Iraq they can't stop.
A number of other initiatives, new entitlement.
And believe me, it's not that they hate the entitlement.
It's the title that was created that they can't claim credit for.
And they're not upset about all the spending that's gone on.
They're just upset that they weren't in charge of it.
And so there are events, and the death of Zarkawi today.
And that'll be a slap upside the head for a while, but they will find a way to ignore it and revert to their false reality, their little dream world in which they live, and continue to try to make what they hope happens the reality down the road.
I got to go with a quick timeout, but we have much more right after this.
All right, back we are on the Rush Limbaugh program here for the Limbaugh Institute for Advanced Conservative Studies.
A couple of things here.
I don't know if you people have heard about this.
I have not yet mentioned it, and that is something for which I will take the blame.
But Mogadishu, which for all intents and purposes means Somalia, is now back in the hands of al-Qaeda militants.
If you remember back in the early days of Black Hawk Down, that was a battle in Mogadishu that we won.
But because some American Rangers, Army Rangers, were dragged dead and near naked through the streets, the U.S. military pulled out a lot of factors there.
Clinton didn't want to hit to his approval numbers.
He didn't want to send an armed force in to do battle against an all-black military.
He just wasn't going to do that.
And so we pulled out of there.
And at that time, the warlords ran Somalia.
Now, the warlords had their associations with Al-Qaeda, but Al-Qaeda was in its, well, compared to today and in the 9-11 era, it was in its formative stages.
And to remind you again, Bin Laden said that when he saw our pullout for Mogadishu is when he was convinced, and he said this on tape to an ABC reporter.
He was convinced we could be had because we had lost the stomach for casualties.
The warlords ran that place for the longest time, but Al-Qaeda moved back in and has taken it over.
And a lot of people say, what does Al-Qaeda want with Mogadishu?
What do they want with Somalia?
It's why they were in the Sudan, and it's why they were in Afghanistan.
Al-Qaeda cannot survive in countries that have active state governments.
They thrived under the Taliban in Afghanistan because there was no state government.
It was a stateless country, if you will.
And that's where Al-Qaeda and a lot of terrorist organizations actually thrive.
The effort to get back into Mogadishu is precisely because it's now stateless.
It didn't have much of a cohesive government anyway, a bunch of warlords running around starving their people as always.
But even the coalition of warlords finally banding together could not defeat the al-Qaeda troops, militants, whatever you want to call them, in Mogadishu.
So Mogadishu has fallen to Al-Qaeda.
I'm not going to get into it.
Does that mean we've got to go there?
I'm just saying they seek stateless regimes, stateless countries.
They have been kicked out of Afghanistan.
They're not going to establish a beachhead in Iraq, contrary to what the hopeful left and the Democrat Party in this country thinks.
And that's what's significant about Somalia and Mogadishu.
Al-Qaeda will become the state, if you will, the regime, the government, along with, it'll be a quasi-government and a Taliban-like.
Second thing is, I'm getting all kinds of emails.
Rush, what do you think of the thing going on with Ann Coulter?
Let me address that because, you know, the left is, I don't know where to start with this.
This is so good.
It is so.
I don't, for the life of me, understand so much about what the left is doing.
Hillary Clinton actually responding to what Ann Coulter said on the Today Show about the Jersey girls is one of the biggest political faux pas a major politician could make.
Why in the, I don't understand what these people don't get about this.
I know what Hillary, I've got to come to the defense of my constituents, the Jersey girls.
I know they're not New Yorkers, but they're Democrats.
They supported John Kerry and so forth.
And she thought she was being decorous and valorous and so forth.
But all it did was give Ann Coulter a chance to say, hey, look, if Mrs. Clinton is going to start being concerned about angry women, perhaps she should go talk to her husband, who was accused by rape of rape by Juanita Broderick and was groping Kathleen Willey at the moment Kathleen Willey's husband was committing suicide.
Slap down, smack down, score one for Ann Coulter.
They can't win.
The left clearly can't win.
But the comments on the Jersey girls and so forth about the enjoying the deaths of their husbands, I'm not sure that's a fully in-context comment.
I'm not sure she said that about the Jersey girls or about the Democrats and the left in this country who use that as an opportunity to politicize these women.
These women obviously grown up to love fame.
And there's no question about it.
There's no question they become political activists.
And there's no question that they're acting as though the 9-11 attack was an attack on them specifically and individually as opposed to their husbands.
But here's the real bottom line.
What I love is witnessing something that's not a phenomenon, it's a fact.
And that is the left screeches and wails the loudest when you tell the truth about them.
When you nail them, they just can't stand it, folks.
Their whole game plan is to hide who they are as best they can.
Their whole game plan is to mask and camouflage themselves.
When they get nailed for who they really are and what they really are, they just go berserk.
And it's about, you know, they can run around and call Bush Hitler, and they can run around and say all these horrible, rotten things.
Michael Moore produces a movie chock full of lies.
They can have people write books on assassinating George W. Bush.
And we are told we need to go see the movie.
We need to read the book.
There are things to learn here.
Bush is the biggest terrorist in the world.
There's actual slander and libel that the left is engaging in.
Michael Moore takes people out of context.
He's in the process of being sued by somebody who was misused in his movie for $85 million, a military man who was a video clip taken totally out of context.
You can say whatever you want about Ann Coulter, but she doesn't lie about what liberals say.
She doesn't make it up and she doesn't take it out of context.
It is between your eyes truth.
Just as all of us on the right are between the eyes truth when we talk about and identify the left.
They can't handle it.
When the truth is spoken about them, why it's an outrage.
And they stop the presses and they start talking about cruelty.
They never examine their own extremists or their own mainstream types who have said far worse things than Ann Colder has said, and they don't have the ability to say these things with humor.
Who what?
What about I'm not familiar with that?
So I don't know who Wayne Church is.
Give me that story later.
All I'm saying is, folks, that a bullseye has been hit and they can't handle it.
And anytime, I am all for it anytime somebody gets the truth out about the left and their reaction to it because it's instructive to people, the whole country, and they are on the ropes and their reaction proves it.
And let's not forget it was Ward Churchill who called all the victims of 9-11 a bunch of little Eichmans.
And, well, he has tenure.
▲
Export Selection