All Episodes
Previous Next
May 18, 2006 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:25
May 18, 2006, Thursday, Hour #3
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
There's so many parts of this day that are just hilarious.
Do you know?
I just saw this.
The Washington Post actually has an op-ed by John Conyers.
The subject of which, oh, I I'm not going to be in a hurry to impeach Bush.
I'm going to take my time about it.
No, the headline, no rush to impeach Bush.
Now, what the hell is that?
They've got polling data that shows if that's what their purpose in getting elected is, it isn't going to work.
But if there's any Conyers out there to write this, this is just absurd.
And it's as typical of how these people they're clueless.
Literally out of touch.
Greetings, my friends.
Ah, the GOP divide, look at right there.
I knew it when CNN called and wanted me to go on a show tonight.
The GOP divide, they're showing my questions to Cheney.
And now this Brooks column today, I knew it.
I knew it.
When they detect, when they sense a rift in the Republican Party for it's orgasm time.
And they just they cannot wait to uh exploit it and expand it.
Yes, CNN called and and wanted me to appear with Anderson Cooper tonight, and I said, I can't do it.
Uh uh EIB network never sleeps.
I got the newsletter staff in town.
We have a working uh uh dinner tonight, and I wouldn't do it anyway, but um it can't do it.
He was very polite in telling them so there it is, the GOP divide.
So predictable.
800-282-2882.
If you want to be on the program, the email address rush at EIBNet.com.
All right, our last caller was Edwin from Fort Myers, uh, Florida, and as what what's happening to our representative Republican or Republicans aren't responding to us, uh responding to us the way we want on immigration.
And uh, what do we do?
We go elect these people and they don't govern, and what do we do?
I dealt with this in great detail a couple days ago, but let me very briefly touch on this again.
Um representative republic does not mean, folks, that you elect people who go to Washington and impoll you and find out what you want and do it.
Some do, some are panderers, some go there and lead.
You know, representative uh republic uh has leaders, and sometimes or senator or congressman will say, Look, I know you disagree with me on this, but I'm doing what I think's the right thing to do.
You elected me for my judgment.
And if when the guy or the woman is up for re-election and you don't like their judgment, then you vote against them.
It's how it works, which goes to the second point.
Um there's a rebellion going on one politician at a time.
Take a look at these primary elections that have taken place uh in the in the last two to three weeks.
It's typical, though, that a lot of the lot of the senators uh leading the charge on this idiocy of uh immigration, illegal immigration, are not up for election this year, but they will be at some point.
They will have to go back to the people of their states and ask for their votes again.
Um it's uh built into the system.
Things change slowly uh in in this country.
Uh radical change is actually not possible.
It's been it's been uh uh Constitution was written, uh designed so that radical change wouldn't happen.
Um and and the whole structure of the government's based that way, uh and the the whole electoral process uh is that we could have elections every day if we wanted to, if we wanted to try to do that, but that would be foolish.
So uh representative republic is not failing anybody.
Um it's it's just the way if you're gonna if you're gonna make the investment as a citizen of getting involved in this, then you have to understand it's a lifetime thing.
I mean, you're you're into it for the long haul, and and your ideas and your principles matter, and you'll work constantly at trying to secure their dominance uh and and their victory.
And that's why this this talk of of um I've had it rushed.
Yes, screw these people.
I'm not sending them any more, man.
I'm not gonna vote.
Well, you don't have to send the money, but when you when you don't vote, it's the same thing as voting for the other party.
It really, and there is a distinct difference.
No matter how rotten you think our guys are right now, some of them.
Uh and it is hard to make a case for some of them.
The alternative at this point in time in history to me is unacceptable.
And anything that leads to the alternative happening is a bad move.
That's why I want To talk about these two um optimistic pieces.
Let's let's go first to uh Jeffrey Lord, former political director in the Reagan White House, and the author of the Borking Rebellion today at American Spectator Online.
The conservative victory in 2006.
Now, by the way, I I know a lot of you people is so depressed and down in the dumps that the idea of positive news you think is just going to make you feel even worse because you can't believe it.
Uh you got to get over that.
Uh you know, being optimistic is uh sometimes takes effort, well, it always takes effort, feeling down on the dumps and lethargic and depressed and doom and gloomy.
It's uh it's much more natural uh for those emotions to overcome you than it is to think positive.
So don't reject this.
This is not pie in the sky Pollyanna stuff.
Forget the predictions of disaster for the Republican Party in 2006.
This election is over before it starts, and conservatives win.
Could Republicans lose control of the House or Senate?
Sure.
Would that make President Bush's life miserable for the last two years?
Absolutely.
But predictions of disaster for conservatives fly in the face of very solid history, ignoring completely the power of political paradigms.
Elections are about paradigms, not presidents.
In 1946, the dominant paradigm was the liberal worldview of tax and spend government, combined with an internationalist foreign policy that today is referred to as American exceptionalism.
The liberal political theories behind FDR's New Deal had been seared into the American psyche thanks to the Great Depression and two world wars.
The GOP ran against Harry Truman in the 46 off-year congressional elections.
They didn't run against the ran against Truman.
He won in the ballot, whipping the war-weary country to a frenzy on the slogan, had enough.
Liberals angry at Truman for not being FDR simply stayed home.
Republicans won going away, taking back control of both the House and the Senate for the first time since 1928.
Yet when Truman mounted the rostrum in the now Republican House chamber on January 6th of 47 to give his State of the Union address, he bet correctly that the dominant liberal paradigm was still the foundation of the American political mindset.
Truman poured forth liberal proposals for antitrust law, health insurance, child care, hospital construction, veterans and civil rights.
Biographer David McCullough notes that Truman did not retreat one inch from the domestic programs he had promised to a Democratic Congress as the sudden successor to FDR in his 1945 message.
The paradigm that had won Democrats eight out of nine of the previous national elections was totally intact in Truman's 47 speech, despite the fact Republicans had won the House and Senate.
The internationalist agenda that had become inseparably linked to the domestic big government policies of the liberal paradigm, not only thrived after the 46 Democrat defeat, it made GOP converts.
On July 25th of 47, Truman's National Security Act was passed with significant help from Michigan Republican Senator Arthur Vandenberg, a pre-war isolationist.
Vandenberg was now both the president pro-temps of the new Republican Senate as well as chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee.
Shocked by Pearl Harbor visiting London during a German attack, the powerful Michigander had become a thoroughgoing convert to the FDR liberal paradigm of American exceptionalism in foreign affairs.
He helped lead the fight for by the way, I have to intersect here or interject that the whole concept of American exceptionalism anywhere is no longer part of the liberal paradigm.
It has been totally co-opted by us.
They don't believe in American exceptionalism.
They think America is the enemy.
They think America's the problem.
They think America's too big.
Listen to Madeline Albrecht, listen to Bill Clinton running around the world, apologizing to every country that wants to listen to him about our supposed imperialistic transgressions.
This whole concept of American exceptionalism is gone from the Democratic Party and from the left.
Now, this is not to say that Republicans were incapable of using their election win to score a political success, back to'46 here, that went against the dominant paradigm.
Ohio Senator Robert Taft co-authored what became landmark labor relations legislation, a Taft-Hartley Act, when Truman vetoed the bill designed to rein in his union allies.
The GOP passed it again over his veto.
Yet Taft Hartley Stands out precisely because it is almost alone as a Republican success in an era when voters were simply unwilling to overturn the existing liberal paradigm.
Truman, his approval ratings having dropped a stunning 50 points to 32%, not only never retreated from the paradigm, he kept turning up the heat on those who fought it.
In January of 48, standing again in front of a frosty GOP Congress, he dumped still more liberal policy proposals on the table.
There was a massive housing program, aid to education, health care, support for farmers, an increase in the minimum wage, and more civil rights legislation.
When Republicans made a point of ignoring his ideas, Truman pounced, labeling the GOP legislators at do nothing Congress.
And then he taunted his own liberal base, which uh had set out the 46 election.
You don't want to do like you did in 46, Truman barked.
Two thirds of you stayed at home in 46, and look what a Congress we got.
This is your fault.
That's your fault.
Truman knew his audience and knew that their favorite paradigm was liberalism, and he got his stunning victory, his upset victory over Thomas Dewey winning back a congressional Democrat majority.
Periodic Republican victories over the next 32 years not only failed to break the liberal paradigm, they spawned the cheap imitation known as Republican liberalism.
Not until the Goldwater insurgency of 64 did the GOP begin to successfully develop its own conservative paradigm, a winning paradigm, still the dominant template of today.
And what a parallel.
Here's Bush at whatever they say he is, 33, 35, 39, 29, tracking poll, whatever it is.
And Bush is not relenting, and he's not retreating.
Whatever.
You may not like it, but I mean, and he's he's not leading a conservative movement, don't misunderstand, but uh he's he's not giving them what they want.
He is still acting like he is the dominant figure and his policies are dominant, and they are.
This is a country dominated by a conservative paradigm today, folks.
And you get caught up in looking at approval numbers, tracking polls and all this sort of stuff, a constant negative drumbeat of news from the drive-by media, and you get the idea that's not true.
Uh but it is.
And I especially like the last paragraph of this piece.
Could Republicans lose in 2006?
Yeah.
Will the conservative paradigm lose?
Well, look at it this way.
Rush Limbaugh doesn't draw an audience of twenty million listeners because America is about to sign on to a new liberal paradigm of high taxes, illegal immigration, appeasement, and judicial activism.
So, Mr. Lord using this program in the size of its audience, meaning you, as an illustration of his theory that the conservative paradigm, and by the way, uh, take a look at all of the efforts that the libs have made to make inroads and talk radio.
It's a dismal failure.
It's almost invisible.
So don't think, folks, that conservatism is losing, and don't think that conservatism's losing favor and luster, and that liberalism's making a comeback because it's not.
And that, folks, explains why you are so frustrated at Republicans inside the beltway because they don't seem to get this.
They don't seem to understand where the country is.
They're more interested in in not being thought of as cruel or mean, typical cliches thrown around about Republicans and conservatives, uh, and they're more interested in competing with Democrats on Democrat turf for the illegal immigrant vote and and uh and whatever else.
And that's why you're frustrated.
Okay, what do you do with your frustration?
You don't stay home, for one thing.
I don't care what you do, contributing-wise, money-wise, but if there's a rebellion, you gotta be on the field.
Back after this.
You're guiding light through times of trouble, confusion, murkiness, tumult, chaos, depression.
Doom and gloom, despair, and even the good times.
Right, here's optimistic piece number two.
And by the way, one other thing, you know, when you go back to 46 and you review the period of time that uh previous uh writer, Mr. Lord, was talking about the uh period of American exceptionalism uh in American foreign policy, that that was a Democrat idea.
You go back in that era, you find that Democrats and Republicans agreed on foreign policy.
I mean, World War II and uh Pearl Harbor and so forth.
You didn't have the Republican Party trying to undermine Truman on the basis of the war and trying to defeat Democrats on the basis of depicting the war as immoral and unnecessary and so forth.
The stakes are much higher today, folks.
When it comes to taking action on your part that might result in a change of power, because you got you've got a group of people who don't believe in American exceptionalism today, uh either domestically or in the case of foreign policy, and then that's something to seriously consider.
Now, here's Gary Andres in the Washington Times today.
Conservative columnists have a case of congressional crankiness.
Take Peggy Noon at the Wall Street Journal, for example.
She wrote last week Republicans on the Hill are so far off track it might take losing in November to unlearn the lessons of power.
Media critic Howard Kurtz of the Washington Post found her mood so foreboding, he suggested only Prozac might lift conservatives gathering gloom.
Frustration among conservatives is both palpable and understandable.
Many believe that their pens played a role in promoting the emergence of the Republican majority in Congress.
Many of these pundits.
That their writings promoted all this.
But frustration's also a communicable disease, and selective memory loss is one of its symptoms.
Conservatives may need a dose of remembrance and a lesson in the limits of power the majority party faces in the modern Congress.
The same writers that helped inaugurate a Republican majority could hand congressional gabbles to liberal lawmakers by creating a pandemic of low turnout among conservatives.
How soon we forget.
When President Bush took office, the economy was teetering on the brink of recession.
The Republican Congress passed legislation to cut taxes every year since Bush took office, including the latest signed into law yesterday, extending capital gains and dividends tax cuts for two more years.
These fiscal policies championed by conservatives keep the economy surging forward, representing tangible evidence that supply-side economics works.
Don't bet that New York Democrat Charlie Wrangle is Ways and Means Committee Chair would continue this pattern.
Conservatives also promote legal reforms.
In the last couple of years, the Republican Congress passed, and the President signed comprehensive class action reform, gun manufacturers' liability reform, and bankruptcy reform, all over the vigorous objections of the left and their friends in a trial bar.
Michigan Democrat John Conyers certainly would not follow this path as chairman of the House Judiciary Committee.
These are frightening thoughts, Wrangle and Conyers.
The Republican majority in Congress has been a bulwark defending the culture of life.
The 108th Congress passed, and the President signed the Unborn Victims of Violence Act and a partial birth abortion ban.
Democrat uh Nancy Pelosi would not even schedule these items for a vote if she were the House Speaker.
Republicans in the Senate defeated the left by confirming two outstanding conservative jurists to the Supreme Court, John Roberts and Sam Alito.
They'll put a conservative imprint on the court, possibly for decades.
The list could go on.
It just seems that some conservatives have a case of selective amnesia overcome by the anti-Republican aroma in a Washington atmosphere with a nose that only smells bad news.
Have there been some missteps?
Sure.
But Republican lawmakers like the rest of us are fallible.
We elect politicians, not popes.
Frustrated conservatives should arm and aim their fury at the real culprit, the 45 Democrat senators who have the means and motive to block most conservative initiatives.
Consider what the House, uh, where majority really means 50% plus one has passed in the last several years, permanent tax cuts, death tax elimination, medical malpractice uh reform, creating opportunity zones in urban areas, welfare reform, child interstate abortion notification, head start reform, just to name a few.
The House could have also adopted some version of Social Security reform with personal accounts and tax simplification had Senate prospects not been so bleak.
While Washington shorthand says Republicans told the majority in the Senate, the phrase is a misnomer.
Excuse me, a day after the 2004 election, I wrote in the weekly standard a conservatives ought to temper their expectations, despite a four-seat gain by Republicans.
A combination of new Democrat tactics and old Senate rule still leaves the minority the power to frustrate the Republicans' legislative agenda.
It's a sixty vote chamber now, folks, with the filibuster and all that.
So instead of wallowing in frustration, conservatives need a new mantra.
There's more work to do.
They should begin by painting a more realistic picture of the meaning of controlling the Senate for conservative voters and then promote the creation of a real majority by trying to elect five to seven more Republican senators.
Prozac cannot lift the collective spirits of conservatives, but neither will Speaker Pelosi.
So and that what I especially like about this is the focus on praising the House and what they've done because with this immigration debate is highlighted, we can't lose the House, folks.
That's that's an imperative.
All right.
That's the uh injection of upbeat optimism for the day.
Of course, it's always happens here back in a moment.
Hi, welcome back, my friends.
Great to have you with us here at the Limbaugh Institute for Advanced Conservative Studies.
Remember the uh there are no degrees and there are no graduates from this institute uh because the learning never stops.
Uh phone number 800-282-2882.
This is just hilarious.
The lift is out there going orgasmic over Al Gore's stupid new movie.
Uh uh what is the name of this idiotic movie?
The an inconvenient truth.
And have you heard that Beverly Hills High School, 90210, gonna let the students out of school, 1,500 of them to go see the movie.
I kid you not, school's nearly on for the summer, but before the break, students at Beverly Hills Hascral will get a heat day when they get to Ditch class to see Al Gore's new movie.
On May 24th, six days from now, 1,500.
Beverly Hills Hascral students will be boarding 30 buses.
Buses use what?
Gasoline.
And they're gonna be bust across town to see Al Gore's new global warming film and inconvenient truth at the Arc Light Theater in Hollywood.
Sarah Utley, a science teacher at Beverly Hills Has School, explained in an email to staff and students.
This field trip has been funded by a very generous alum.
You get to see the film for free.
Utley would not reveal who is financing the school outing to mark the opening day of the movie.
We need parent volunteers who can ride the buses and sit in the theater, she said in her pitch.
The buses are arriving at 8 a.m.
Be back at Beverly Hills Has School by 1 p.m.
The parents uh the film's uh urgent trailer warns humanity is sitting on a ticking time bomb.
If the vast majority of the world scientists are right, we have just ten years.
And we're we're we've got the Al Gore destruction of the Earth countdown clock right there at Rush Limbaugh.com.
Humanity is sitting on a ticking time bomb if the vast majority of the world scientists are right, we have just ten years to avert a major catastrophe that could send our entire planet into a tailspin of epic destruction involving extreme weather, floods, droughts, epidemics, and killer heat waves beyond anything we have ever experienced.
Insiders claim that Utley has annoyed some students with her insistence that global warming is a proven science.
She's obsessed with it, said one source.
Can't we just go see X-Men?
There are some sensible students, obviously at uh Beverly Hills High.
Is this not absurd?
Well, I mean, it could do with the you know it's some Hollywood leftist.
Some Hollywood leftists has funded all of this.
And I'm gonna tell you, I I'm gonna go on record right now.
I think Al Gore is gonna run for president again.
And I think that there are some Democrats out there who can't wait for it.
I think there's some Democrats think that a dream ticket would be Al Gore and Howard Dean.
And I I kid you not.
And I think this movie, oh, they're that whacked, yes.
And this this movie is is uh, you know, takes him back to his roots, earth in the lurch.
Uh the the book that he wrote.
But is the whole thing is absurd.
The whole panic uh behind global warming is simply absurd.
Ten years.
You know, when I started this show in 1988, one of the first things that happened when I started this show was that noted oceanographer, uh Ted Danson, uh predicted if we didn't clean up the oceans in ten years, the oceans would die.
And if the oceans die, we die.
Well, it's been 18.
It's been 18 years, and the oceans are still fine.
In fact, we sank and we sank uh or sunk whatever the air uh aircraft carrier from the Vietnam era out there in the Gulf.
Uh and we did it to create a new coral reef uh for little fishies and wildlife to make homes out of, swim in and out of and so forth.
Old rusted aircraft carrier, pssh blew it up, things sank.
Now, I would think that this is polluting the oceans, but no one's actually helping the little fish out there.
At any rate, um there is a counter going on to Al Gore's movie, Big Oil has launched an attack on Al Gore.
Now, this is a headline from a liberal blog.
Today the competitive enterprise institute will unveil two 60-second TV ads focusing on what it calls global warming alarmism and the call by some environmentalist wacko groups and politicians to reduce fossil fuel and carbon dioxide emissions, the ad, which will be aired in more than a dozen cities across the country, being released just a week before the May 24th opening of Al Gore's movie and inconvenient truth.
Well, who is CEI, the competitive enterprise institute?
The Washington Post explains.
The competitive enterprise institute, which widely publicizes its belief the earth is not warming cataclysmically because of the burning of coal and oil, says Exxon Mobil is a major donor, largely as a result of its effort to push that position.
CEI also gets funding from other oil companies through the American petroleum industry.
So what?
You've got a bunch of absolute whacked out hate America liberals in Hollywood sponsoring a stupid, absolutely intellectually depraved, dishonest movie, and now trying to propagandize and poison the minds of a bunch of Beverly Hills high school students, and nobody finds anything unusual or untoward about that.
In the meantime, big oil, the target of destruction among many targets of the American left, decides to defend itself, and they are attacked even for that.
Michael, Charleston, South Carolina, great to have you on the program, sir.
Hey, Megan Diddles from the great state of South Carolina.
Thank you, sir.
I just wanted to point out to uh our Republican representatives in the beltway that uh I'm not sure who they think all of their Republican support comes from, but a lot of this new support that they're starting to see that's voting out the Democrats and the Republicans are the former liberals that are starting to see the way and starting to see that the conservative values are are working for our country,
and maybe they need to be reminded of that so that they will step up and represent not only the people that have always given them their vote, but the new liberals they are converting to receive their vote.
Um, I do think you have a point about it.
I think there are new Republican slight conservative uh converts.
Well, I know it's happening because this show is largely responsible for a lot of them.
Absolutely.
And I and I and and so are other uh uh programs like this.
Now, but we're still back to uh you know what these guys, the Republicans in Washington uh, have to uh understand and realize and so forth.
I'm I'm just gonna make a prediction to you.
And and I folks, I don't want you to get frustrated by this.
It's as natural as the sun coming up in the morning, except for the next ten years it won't, but until then it will.
And that is this.
By the time we get down to um, you know, pedal hit in the middle on this election, you're gonna see and hear some of the most conservative rhetoric out of these Washington Republicans that you've ever heard.
When it comes time to hit the campaign trail, uh you're gonna be scratching your head.
I thought I haven't heard this in two years or four years.
Well, all of a sudden now.
And they're gonna think that they can uh uh buy you back with this, and that's okay uh uh because they know what wins elections.
You can watch that by watching how they campaign during election.
And by the way, they're they're gonna pay attention at these Rhino Republicans and how they're losing and why.
You know, you if if if you're an open borders Republican and you're up for election, you may as well just resign because you are going to lose.
If you're a Republican that has uh worked with Democrats to promote high taxes or liberal social policy, because you think America's too too partisan, you want everybody to get along.
If you're a Republican working with Democrats to promote Democrat Ideas and liberal ideas, you are going to lose if you're up for election this year.
And they're noticing this, uh, and they will as we get closer.
Look at McCain.
McCain's the best indicator of this.
What is McCain doing?
Everybody was on the belief that he was going to go his version of the Bull Moose Party, third party.
And some say he still could if uh his attempts to get back in the good graces of America's conservatives, uh, American conservatives fails.
But what he clearly, Jerry Falwell, uh Pat Robertson, uh he's clearly uh making a uh a pitch to go get the people that he uh angered, enraged, and ticked off uh back in 2000.
He knows it was what we just talked about, the conservative paradigm.
So this will happen.
You're you're gonna you're gonna wonder, and then you should say, where's this been the last two years when you're in Washington governing?
You can you can say that to them.
Um you have that reaction.
Here is uh Will in Santa Cruz.
Now, this is always an adventure.
Santa Cruz, California.
Welcome, sir.
Nice to have you with us.
Thank you, Rush.
Uh, I look forward to seeing you again at the Pebble Beach Pro Am in January.
Thank you, sir.
I will be there.
Excellent.
Uh, my question is if and when there is some meaningful legislation passed, uh, let's say by the House, uh, what is the chance that the ACLU types are going to pick this apart, take it to court, and Ginsburg and the rest of them uh go along with that.
And there's always my chance.
That's why judicial reform is also part of our wide-ranging, never ending, never quit agenda.
Yes.
Um, you know, I uh I in fact, the ACLU has already joined with Mexico to sue us over this National Guard business.
I have it in the stack here on the immigration stack, and get to it.
The ACLU's out there gonna join with Mexico to sue us if the guard apprehends one illegal.
Uh yep, that's that's uh that's entirely possible.
But these things take a look at the abortion debate.
I I mentioned earlier that these things happen slowly.
I mean it it it took us a long time to get to this this perverted culture in some sectors that we have.
You know, it took liberalism a while to inculcate people and and and uh create their own paradigm, if you will.
And we're in the process of reversing it, and the public opinion on abortion is now in our favor.
Uh despite the Democrats' threats to filibuster, we've got two really, really fine new uh uh originalist jurists on the Supreme Court.
Um and they're probably gonna be an opportunity to appoint one more before the president leaves office.
So these things I that's what the reason I spent the first half hour of this hour chronicling some of the positive things that uh that have happened.
All that you suggest is entirely possible because the left is never going to go away.
They are never going to give up.
Uh they've got other problems.
They they refuse to analyze their own role in their own demise.
And until they do that, they're never seriously gonna fix things.
But they're also, folks, what are they gonna do?
Remember the story earlier this week.
They're going to inject spiritualism into their campaign.
Inject it.
As though you're gonna go to syringe, put God in the syringe, and go, pssh shoot up just for the campaign.
I'm telling you if you have to inject God or religion or spirituality in your agenda, it isn't there.
And so it's the same thing.
Smoke and mirrors.
They cannot.
They are hampered by one hard cold reality.
They can't be honest about who they are and what they want to do, because they'd be even in worse shape than they are now.
I gotta run because of the constraints of time back in just a second.
Hi, welcome back.
All right, folks, there's some other news here.
And time is uh is growing short here, running out of precious broadcast moments uh for today.
This this amazing, I found this at World Net Daily.
According to its president, the National Breast Cancer Coalition has revolutionized public policy in the quest to eradicate breast cancer.
But they they they have an odd way of running its revolution.
On May 4th, the National Breast Cancer Coalition announced the Golden Boob Awards.
The golden boob awards to highlight the biggest boobs of all, the organizations that are using breast cancer purely as a way to make money or to promote an ideology.
I'm not making this up.
The National Breast Cancer Coalition actually came up with a golden boob awards.
Now, as as they say here at World Net Daily, that they would so crassly refer to a body part carrying such deep sexual and maternal significance to those mourning or fearing its loss is shameful.
It's like it's like announcing the little Baldy Awards for child leukemia research.
NBCC's top nominee was the Coalition on Abortion Breast Cancer, of which I am an advisory member.
But it's somebody at World Net Daily.
NBCC accused the Coalition on Abortion Breast Cancer of using breast cancer as a scare tactic by asserting abortion leads to an increased risk of breast cancer.
Well, that just that's what the research is.
Anyway, typical libs, folks.
And of course, what's going on with R U 46 and all these women dying with this thing?
You think why?
Abortion is such the sacrament to the left that even a pill that pulls off the stunt of abortion without actually doing an abortion is not going to be investigated.
What?
They say they don't know why that's even worse.
You think the FDA, let's go look at Viox, shall we?
Let's go look at whatever the hell else we're getting off the market.
Because it caused heart attacks, causes this, causes that.
But the R U 486 pill, women are dying.
We're not sure about that.
You libs are just pathetic.
It's absolutely striking to watch you.
Joey Porter, Pittsburgh Steelers.
Number 55.
He's he's he's the is the team leader of the defense.
He's uh is outspoken, motor mouth, puts bulletin board material up for the other team during the game.
Said Steelers are gonna be in the in Washington White House on June 2nd to meet the president.
They're gonna get their Super Bowl rings, and Porter said, Yeah, I'm looking forward to it.
I'm gonna have some swagger when I walk in there too.
I have something to tell him.
I don't like the way things are running right now.
I feel like he's got to give me some of my money back, so I got something to tell Bush.
Now, as you people know, I love the Steelers.
Uh and and Joey Porter does qualify as rich, but if he doesn't know that Bush has already given his money back, uh starting in 2002 when these tax cuts were authorized.
If he doesn't know that already, anyway, they got to him and he says, I was only kidding.
I was just being Joey Porter.
I apologize.
Um backing off what he said were tongue-in-cheek comments that he plans to tell President Bush uh next month that he dislikes how the country is being run.
It sounds like he's upset with his taxes.
Um Joey, go look at what they were.
Well, I don't know if you're being uh go to your accountant and ask your accountant what your taxes would be under Bill Clinton's economic policies.
The first theme park, world's first theme park dedicated to sex and relationships set to open in London's West End later this year, its promoters said today.
Um excited if we have the first sex theme park in it.
You Brits, we've already got one called a Clinton Library.
Uh more than 40% of women.
No, there's more to the story, but I mean, the Brits think they've got a big deal with their uh sex theme park, and we've already got one.
Hell, we had a it's the the West End.
It's in it's in Great Britain.
We had a the White House is a sex theme park for crying out loud uh in in the 90s and has been moved to that double wide uh display called a Clinton Library and Massage Parlor.
The Academy of Sex and Relationships, featuring high-tech and interactive exhibits together with new media displays, expects up to 600,000 visitors within its first year.
It's gonna be at Piccadilly Circus.
Uh titillation's not the goal.
No, no, they of course they probably want to make sex boring.
What do you mean titillation's not the goal?
You're gonna have the first sex theme park, and you're not trying to titillate.
Our vision is to build a Kenzie type institute in Europe for Generation Y and Generation X to bring modern thinking around sexuality.
It it truly is the world's first theme park dedicated to sex and relationships.
Well, they're gonna talk about relationships.
I'll guarantee you, not very many guys are gonna show up.
All right, folks, that's it.
Another sterling three hour excursion into broadcast excellence in the can.
It's a fastest week in media, and tomorrow is Friday.
Open line Friday.
It's always exciting.
I look forward to seeing you there.
Thanks for being with us today.
▲
Export Selection