All Episodes
April 20, 2006 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:12
April 20, 2006, Thursday, Hour #3
|

Time Text
Greetings to your thrill seekers, music lovers, conversationalists, all across the fruited plain, Rush Limbo, soon to be amidst billowing clouds of fragrant aromatic first, second, and maybe even third-hand premium cigar smoke.
One of the finest aromas one can create for one's environment.
We are here at 800-282-2882, the email address rush at EIBnet.com.
If you're just joining us, if you're a welfare recipient just getting out of bed, trust fun kid that doesn't have anything to do, blue blood that inherited all your money, rich Republican wannabe, what have you, for just joining us, we're going to repeat the opening segment of the program today by popular demand.
People throughout the audience are demanding to hear this again.
Some aren't, but I know why.
One of the critics, hey, look, we've heard it.
We'd rather hear more excellence from you that's original.
We don't hear repeats in the same show.
Besides, everybody's stolen your idea and everybody does what you did.
That may be true.
I did start this trend of analyzing foreign leaders who come to this country to make speeches in their native tongue.
And the translation, yeah, it's intended to be funny, but as I've always told you folks, whether it's serious discussion, whether it's satire, parody, humor, whatever, there's always a point to be made in everything that we do here.
And I know that Jon Stewart does this routinely, but nobody watches that in comparison.
But besides that, I mean, I'm the originator of this.
I started this technique, and there's no one like the master to continue to do these.
So, President Hu, an official arrival ceremony at the White House today on the, I think it was the South Lawn, and this is how it went.
President, President, President, President, Ladies, Ladies, Ladies, Gentlemen, I would like to ask the President of the President.
Thank you, Mr. President, for your kind invitation that I know you really don't mean.
I wanted a full state visit complete with state dinner.
You denied my request.
Instead, I have to stand here in the sun making like I'm enjoying this.
I know you hate state dinners because you go to bed at 9 o'clock, but I wanted to party, like when our good friend Bill Clinton was here.
And I would have told you where Bin Laden is if you'd given me the chance to boogie.
Do you really think I would spend time in your shack in Texas?
I see enough shacks every day without going to yours.
No way was I going to have a summit in a shack as you originally wanted.
No Chikom leader will be caught dead in a photo op chopping wood.
In fact, no Chikom leader will be caught dead.
I also want to thank the American people for stopping the Dubai ports deal.
We, we own your ports, and we will strangle you.
We don't need Dubai.
Everybody from Bill Gates to George Bush is complaining to me about intellectual property.
Know this, America.
Your intellectual property is ours.
Bill Gates is an idiot thinking he'd intimidate me.
I wouldn't use Windows if he paid me.
I'm a Mac guy.
That gaudy house, his made me sick.
Why don't you shoot that protester?
Run her over with a tank or send her to your prison called Club Gitmon Torture.
This is sabotage.
You telling me that President Bush can't shut that woman up.
King Jong-hil warned me about this.
should have listened anyway back to Bill Gates That gaudy house of his made me sick.
Somebody shut that woman up or I'm leaving.
That gaudy house of Gates has made me sick.
He's a true capitalist pig and he's proud of it.
Such arrogance.
And his menu, only three courses for the future dictator of the world.
And I had my choice between halibut and steak.
I'm tired of eating fish.
You can't eat filet mignon with chopsticks.
I was tempted to tell him I wanted some white rice with missiles from Comrade Charlie Tree's restaurant in Little Rock just to see what he would do.
And I don't appreciate being lectured to about our currency.
We own most of your national debt.
We have destroyed a significant portion of your manufacturing base with wages lower than you even pay those fool immigrants.
You keep this up, we're going to sell the debt of yours that we own to Dubai.
Here's the truth.
You are a bunch of weak, devout cowards more interested in watching American idol than you are in defending your weak, pathetic, capitalist pig country.
And by the way, the way you portrayed us as inept on your show 24, we knew Jack Bauer was alive all the time.
He's not worth dealing with.
We will bury you.
Chinese people are slaves.
They will die on my command.
Besides, I need to get rid of about 300 million of them anyway because we can't feed them.
What better way than by using them to bury you?
Which reminds me, how come you're deporting our illegal immigrants who arrive in shipping containers at ports we run, yet you open your border to the Mexicans?
You let Fox get away with solving his problems that you stand in our way while pledging mutual understanding and cooperation?
We will bury you.
You think we have mutual strategic interests?
Wrong.
Unless you Americans want to be buried, you believe any phony compliment offered by anybody.
You don't even know me, and you're treating me better than your own president.
I know what your stupid drive-by media is going to do with a protester.
They're going to get mad at her.
They're going to ask why in the world would Bush allow this to happen and disrespect me, a communist.
You are such softies.
We will bury you.
As far as the lunatic in Iran is concerned, the only thing stopping us from burying you now, and I agree with that lunatic, the only thing stopping us from burying you now is George W. Bush.
We're patient people.
We will wait until you elect a Democrat as president.
As communists, we understand how to scare the hell out of them.
We encourage global warming because we get away with it without punishment.
We know this is because you are scared to death of us, as you should be.
We will bury you.
And don't cry to me about oil and gasoline prices, Mr. President, when we have our meeting.
We hope you continue to try and put your big oil executives in prison.
We admire that, but don't think it makes us your friend.
We have every bit the right to steal the world's resources as you do, and we will continue to do so.
I've already had secret meetings with the Saudis.
Know that we are the future leader of the world, plus they know we will bury them too if they don't supply our needs.
We intend to bury them anyway.
All this talk about limiting nuclear weapons is boring.
Who do you think you are to tell the people of the world they can't kill you and anybody else they want?
We agree with your Democrats.
Senator Kennedy, Senator Kerry, America poses the biggest threat to freedom, security, prosperity.
We look forward to working with them in a few years.
We also look forward to expanding cooperation in technology and culture because without yours, we don't have any technology and not much culture.
Besides, we don't allow culture.
Speaking of technology, we bought quite a bit of technology from our friend Bill Clinton, your ex-president.
But we haven't seen all the deliveries.
And now we learn that our friend Bill also allowed the stupid Iranians to nuke up.
We will not be humiliated like this.
Do not try to export your liberalism to us.
We have the real thing in China.
We don't need cheap imitators.
You listen to me on Taiwan.
I'm only going to say this once.
We own it.
It's ours.
And they are dead, or they soon will be.
If you stop us, if you even try to stop us, we will bury you sooner than we intend to.
When I stand here and lie to you about working with the international community to build an enduring peace, I almost gag.
Because I couldn't care less about peace.
We're into domination.
But I know your sappy leftists love the talk of peace.
I almost thought about showing up here in some Birkenstocks just for the fun of it.
The thing is, we don't want peace.
We want domination.
We will bury you.
And then we'll take care of the Russians once and for all.
I also want to say to the American people, I bring with me today a sizable donation to the Cynthia McKinney Legal Defense Fund, just as we contributed to President Clinton's defense fund.
The People's Republic of China supports the oppressed peoples of all countries.
Now I have to go inside this White House.
I have to go into what's called the Oval Office, sit down, and listen to this cowboy preach to me about how wrong we in China are about things.
You'll see some pictures of it, and when you do, notice that I am smiling.
But that's on the outside.
Because on the inside, we are plotting to bury you.
One other thing, we're going to announce during my trip a huge financial and business arrangement with your Walmart.
We love Walmart in China.
They build big factories, big warehouses.
will someday own Walmart.
And we will bury you.
And we are back, cutting edge of societal evolution.
Rush Limbaugh here at the Limbaugh Institute for advanced conservative studies.
There are no degrees.
There are no graduates because the learning never stops.
Randy in Pryor Lake, Minnesota.
I'm glad you called, sir.
Welcome.
Thank you, and terra duro to you, Rush.
Thank you, sir.
I've got a request because I know you're a generous man, and I have to apologize.
I only heard half of the translations from President Wu because I was laughing so hard over the other remarks.
Yeah, that is a problem, but the show goes on.
Well, I was hoping that what you would do is you would link that on the free side of your website and either make it a video or I'm sorry, an audio download or maybe text.
And I would even link to it at my blog.
We would link it to you.
We can't.
I'm having trouble hearing you.
You want to link this on the you want me to link this on the free side of my website, make it either video or audio download, maybe text.
Let me think about that.
All right, because I said, let me think about that because many subscribers of the website are writing saying they're bored by it.
They're doing it again, Mr. Snurdly.
At any rate, let me think about that.
I have an answer for you before the end of the program.
All right, thanks, Rush.
I appreciate it.
Oh, you bet.
Sabrina in Marietta, Georgia.
You're next on the EIB network.
Hi.
Hey, Rush, it's my honor to be able to talk to you.
This is the very first time I will ever be able to get through.
So I am like one of your colleagues that I am an average person, and I appreciate your knowledge and insight.
And I agree with you on most of the issues.
But today, I'm a little bit in disagreement with you about President Wu.
I am a Chinese immigrant.
I came to the United States in the late 1960s.
I think China, because we have 5,000 years of civilization and culture, and China is a very proud nation.
And unlike the Western country, it's ruled by law, China is ruled mostly by Guanxi, you know, relationship.
So in order for China to change from that kind of operation into a law-abiding kind of culture, it takes time.
And I think any kind of communication.
Can I stop you for a question here?
Because I don't want to get the wrong impression.
I don't want the audience to get the wrong impression.
Because when you say that we are a Western country governed by the rule of law and China's not, those of us who have seen things take place in China, it seems like there are a lot of laws and that they are oppressive and that the people have to obey them or they're in trouble.
But China has a lot of law, but a lot of things are being done through relationship.
That's why it's very difficult to deal with China.
You know, you say the law is this way.
A lot of times it doesn't get done strictly by law.
So you have to know how Chinese operate so you can guide it, you know, to influence it, to change to the way that you're going to be able to do it by strictly.
We don't prosper here simply because of and only because of our laws either.
We have a tremendous amount of freedom here, which allows every citizen to reach his maximum potential according to his desires and ambition.
Where are you going with this, though?
Because we have relationships here, too.
I know you're trying to explain the Chinese culture to me, but what do you disagree with what I said earlier or anything I said earlier?
I think President Wu is doing a wonderful job.
President Bush is inviting him to come here, and it's a wonderful thing to expose him to the way American people act and work.
A lot of the Chinese people have come to the United States to study, and they are a very important force to take what they have seen and done here in the United States back to China to change China.
So, and because China is a very proud nation, if you force it, and this is the way you have to do, China is not going to deal with you.
And you can't do that.
Pardon me, I must interrupt because I'm not hearing you say things that differ greatly from what I have said about our economic and cultural relationship with China.
So, what is it you're disagreeing with me about?
Oh, when President Hu was doing his speech, and you have made all those remarks, and it is not true.
And President Wu is opinion is great.
It's only through us working together that we can bring about change.
And I think by saying that.
Yes, we need consensus.
Huh?
Consensus.
We must all get along.
You have to bring the Western culture into China.
It's only by this you can work together.
We're trying to do that.
Right.
Why did you emigrate?
Why did you emigrate?
I came to go to school.
I was born in China and I went to Taiwan because communists came, the family moved to Taiwan when I graduated from college, and I went to graduate school.
Well, now, how do you feel?
How do you feel?
Who addressed this today?
Who I thought was pretty threatening on Taiwan in this speech.
Well, you were raised in Taiwan.
You know full well that they intend to take that back and that they're willing to risk.
It sounds to me like they're willing to risk a confrontation with us in order to do it.
Well, that's where you were wrong because Taiwan is one province of China.
Taiwan is part of China.
You can't just support one Taiwan and make Taiwan independent.
It is part of China.
Well, but I know, but the Taiwanese are not communists.
They're not run by communists.
And the communist Chinese are threatened by this.
And that's why they want to go back and reclaim it.
They want to get rid of the capitalism and the freedom that exists there.
So it is to, I know we have to say diplomatically, I've heard Condi say it, we have to say it, one China policy, but we have a treaty that we have pledged to Taiwan.
If they are attacked by China, we'll defend them.
And who knows this?
And that's what he's threatening today, or mentioning in a mildly threatening way.
Well, I don't think he's threatening.
He said he did stress that Taiwan is part of China.
Well, that's the same thing.
I mean, you've got to learn, as I have, to understand Diplo speak.
When he says it's part of China, he's wagging his finger at us and saying, don't get any ideas.
Sabrina, it's really been a thrill and a delight to talk to you, and I'm glad you called.
We will move on here shortly after this Profit Center timeout.
All right, a couple little human interest stories here, ladies and gentlemen.
You see this story out of Florida, out in Broward County, Philip Winnikoff, name Ring of Bellevue.
You seen this story?
76 years old.
He was arrested yesterday morning, charged with sexual battery after he, yeah, if he posed as a doctor, went door to door with a doctor's bag, a black doctor's bag in his hand, offering women free breast exams.
According to a Broward County Sheriff's Office report, two women, ages 33 and 36, fell for the scam.
What do you think their hair color was?
Which Winnikoff allegedly ran into Lauderdale Lakes.
He was charged with several felonies, booked into the sheriff's lockup, where he had his picture taken.
Police are now investigating whether other women may have been tricked into impromptu examinations.
It's just a little old guy out there trying to.
I sure when Bill Clinton reads this story, he goes, why didn't I think of that?
They love me showing up knocking on the door playing doctor.
And there's this from Live Science.
Another one of these men and women are different stories.
Men and women are actually from the same planet, but scientists now have the first strong evidence that the emotional wiring of the sexes is fundamentally different.
An almond-shaped cluster of neurons that processes experience such as fear and aggression hooks up to contrasting brain functions in men and women at rest.
For men, the cluster talks with brain regions that help them respond to sensors for what's going on outside their body, such as the visual cortex and an area that coordinates motor actions.
For women, the cluster communicates with brain regions that help them respond to sensors inside the body, such as the insular cortex and the hypothalamus.
Now, these areas tune into and regulate women's hormones and their heart rate.
Let me, can I summarize this for you?
This is real simple.
Men have emotional responses related to the outside world, whereas women respond emotionally to whatever's going on inside their heads, and nobody knows that.
And well, that has to be what it is.
I do.
I respond to external stimuli.
I respond to what's going on outside my head.
But women respond emotionally to whatever's going on inside their heads.
You know, desires, fantasies, what have you.
So I'm happy to translate.
Once you scientists start talking here, you need somebody who can explain this to the average layperson of Walmart stores.
They say they're not going to bow to opponents who say the world's largest retailer is too big, and they're going to keep growing as long as customers keep coming to their stores.
This, according to their CEO, Lee Scott, yesterday.
He said the retailer was in the midst of a transformation as it tries to reach customers who shop at stores for food but look elsewhere for fashionable clothing or houseware.
Did you see what Walmart either is planning to do this or did do it already?
Not sure which.
They're actually going to have a seminar for journalists in the drive-by media.
It's done.
Okay, it's going on now.
Okay, it started.
Yes, right.
I think it started on Tuesday.
They're actually conducting a seminar for drive-by journalists to try to teach them how they do business, to show them, to illustrate for them the Walmart way.
Now, for crying out, wow, what does that say about the modern drive-by media?
These are the Pulitzer Prize winners.
These are the people who go out there and win Pulitzer Prizes for exposing secrets.
They go out and get Pulitzer Prizes for things that they should be in jail for.
They can do investigative work.
Sorry, they sit around and wait for the phone to ring and some leaker to call them.
But I mean, you would think these are journalists.
These are people who are supposed to dig in deep and find out what's going on that nobody else knows.
But apparently they're just going on presumption and assumption based on their template.
Walmart's bad.
Democrats don't like it, so it must be bad.
They have horrible non-union labor and so forth.
And so Walmart's got to bring them in and explain to them how they do business.
How hard can it be?
Tim in St. Louis, your next search.
Great to have you with us.
Hey there, Rush.
Mega legal immigrant ditto is from St. Louis.
Thank you.
Rush, the earlier caller was saying, you know, who seemed a bit perplexed about what caused the change in South Africa.
Was it sanctions?
Was it something else?
It's pretty simple.
If you follow the step-by-step process, when Jimmy Carter left office, South Africa was seen as an intractable conflict that would only be resolved with a race war.
Reagan comes in, escalates the conflicts with the Soviets.
As a result, it puts enormous pressure on them that causes the system to collapse.
That in turn withdraws support from the Cubans and the East Germans, who we were fighting in Angola.
They are forced to withdraw as Chester Crocker goes in, conducts constructive engagement, much to the, you know, which the liberals absolutely hated.
They said it would never work.
It was lending support to South Africa.
Within a few years, Namibia had its independence and some sort of a democratic process.
And a few short years after that, South Africa had moved to a democratic system.
And of course, naturally, at the time, the big media never questioned that South Africa should have a parliamentary-style democracy similar to what they have in Europe or the United States.
So it's not your fault.
My hearing was unable to keep up with all of what you said.
But summarize this for me.
Are you suggesting that Reagan did good or bad with his policies?
No, it was absolutely good, Rush.
You know, contrary to what people believed, by removing the threat that you had.
So you're endorsing the whole concept of constructive engagement.
Absolutely, because you removed the threat to the white minority that South Africa would become a Soviet satellite and the next Cambodia.
Well, yeah, that is an unstated aspect.
I'm glad that you made that point because it's absolutely.
In fact, I'm going to get in trouble for saying this.
Back in the 80s, in the early 90s, when you talked about this, this, I mean, the people just got mad at you, but the whole Mandela and Mbeki movement was communist.
It's still a very Marxist-oriented organization.
It was.
We'll call them Marxists.
It was very Marxist.
Winnie Mandela running around necklacing people that didn't go along with what she wanted them to do.
I mean, there's no question.
You're absolutely right about that.
Yeah.
And, you know, that's the thing that people overlook.
Sanctions actually had the reverse effect.
If you look at what actually happened, the more sanctions were imposed and the more stringent they became, the more South Africa withdrew into itself and started to manufacture its own arms, became far more belligerent towards its neighbors.
And it was only when there was the prospect of being able to remove itself from being threatened by the Soviet satellite system, as it were, that South Africa's whites felt comfortable enough that they could look at an open democracy.
Excellent points.
You know, you had forgotten some of that, and you're absolutely right about the Marxist orientation of the Mandela regime and that whole crowd.
You mentioned something else, something else that sanctions did.
All this disinvestment made the country poorer.
And whenever a country gets poorer, it empowers the people running it.
If they have, as you mentioned, the arms to control a population that's dissatisfied.
And it was a mess.
It's a typical way, the way liberals try to handle things, and it never works out.
But your best point about the constructive engagement was it kept us there and kept the Soviets out.
They were attempting client state there with the anti-apartheid movement or the anti-apartheid movement.
And they did co-opt them.
And to this day, one of the reasons they're in a mess is precisely because they have Marxist orientation and roots.
Bruce, in Fort Wayne, Indiana, I'm glad you called, sir.
Welcome to the program.
Hello, Rush.
Personal hood did off to you, sir.
Thank you.
I wanted to discuss the Senator Kennedy comments about Lincoln being dissimilar from Bush because he united the public consensus.
Well, Bush was a divider.
I find that you.
Hang on just a sec.
Hang on, Jizz.
I want to go back and get the bite.
Let's go back and grab Soundbite 8 so people know what you're talking about, okay?
I want to replay this.
Ted Kennedy is on the Today Show today.
Katie Couric said Carl Rove will not be focused so much on domestic policy.
In fact, he'll be focused more on the midterm elections, which Murray Madeline talked about earlier in the program.
How concerned should Republicans be, in your view, about these upcoming elections?
The principal concern that you'd have, that I have with Karl Robe, is that he has really been the architect to the politics of fear.
We had a terrible tragedy in 9-11 here in this country, but that has been the dominant policy of the Republican leadership in the Congress and outside is the politics of fear.
And if you look back historically, where other presidents faced a challenge as President Kennedy at the Cuban Missile Crisis, Franklin Roosevelt in World War II, Abraham Lincoln, they brought the country together to the challenges.
And this has been an administration that's practiced the politics of fear and separation and division, and that has been destructive in American politics.
All right, now, what does he want to say about Lincoln?
Well, I wanted to say was that it shows how jingolistic and how based on style his comments are in terms of being on a board.
I mean, Lincoln was as popular then as Bush was today.
I mean, his comments sound more equivalent to what the segregationalists and the Dixiecrat Confederate mice that would have been in the 1860s.
And it just shows, again, how Kennedy is trying to make inferences about historical base.
That's exactly right.
Okay.
Another great point.
That's exactly.
Lincoln was in worse shape.
You're right, than Bush is today.
Almost didn't get elected for a second term and ended up saving the nation and uniting it.
And Ted Kennedy wanting to somehow appropriate about Lincoln and say that he is not an example of the things that Bush has done through fear.
I mean, Ted Kennedy, if Ted Kennedy were, if Abe Lincoln were the president today, as he was in the Civil War, Ted Kennedy would be in jail.
Ted Kennedy and his ilk would be called agitators and they would be taken away and out of the way so they couldn't upset the stated goals and purpose of the government.
I mean, Lincoln invoked all kinds of, they think the Patriot Act is bad.
I'll never forget the funny story.
Abraham Lincoln, there was some former congressman from Ohio, went back to Ohio, was running for governor.
He was a Democrat.
And he was running for governor on the basis that we had no business fighting the war, the Civil War, and the South was right, and Lincoln was horrible.
And Lincoln sent the militia, the equivalent then of the National Guard, and had this guy taken out of his house and said, if you're going to end up speaking for the enemy, I'm sending you down to Jefferson Davis.
And he shipped him down to Jefferson Davis.
Now, can you imagine?
Wouldn't you love to send a bunch of Democrats over to Iraq?
Hey, if you want to speak up for Saddam Hussein, go over there and see him in court.
We got a C-5A leaving tomorrow morning at 9 o'clock, senators, and you're going to be on it.
That's the equivalent of what Lincoln did.
The difference is that Jefferson Davis didn't want this guy from Ohio.
They sent him to Canada.
Now, you imagine trying something like that today.
Ted Kennedy would be one of Abraham Lincoln's first victims, and there's no way Kennedy would be citing his praises.
Okay, folks, I have made an executive decision.
When it comes to the free side of the website, it would be very normal.
In fact, it will be normal that the transcript and the streaming audio of the translation of President WHO's speech would be on the free side.
The transcript and the streaming audio, not downloadable.
But I have made an executive decision because of the popular demand for this bit We are going to make it available as a free MP3 download today as an added bonus for those of you who are not subscribers so that you can have access to it and spread it around to all your friends and let as many people who will want to hear it hear it as possible.
Sue in Boone, North Carolina.
You're next on the EIB network.
Hi.
Hey, Rush.
Hey.
Love your show.
Thank you.
I think it would be great if you took Scott McClellan's job.
Well, wouldn't that be interesting?
It would be for one day.
I'd love to do it for one day.
I wouldn't take the pay cut.
Well, North Hassel.
I'd get fired after one day because I'd start announcing my own policies.
But it would be so refreshing for someone to speak the truth back to these people and show them how foolish and biased and wrong they are.
I know it's a fantasy.
I fantasize about it, but believe me, it would never happen.
I would never even be asked to do it for that very reason.
Well, one other thing.
You talk a lot about the difference in the media now and like during the Civil War and during World War II.
Hello?
Yes.
Well, there's a book called 1942 that deals about the year 1942 when America almost lost the war.
And it talks specifically about those things, the differences in how the press reacted, the regulations that were put on mail and communication.
That was done by a Democratic president.
But it really is an education.
Oh, I know.
We've talked about this.
Mail was opened.
I mean, any we talked about this in the context of the so-called domestic spying program of Bush.
Yeah, you're right.
I'm glad you reminded me of it.
We've gone through all that before, and it's, well, the differences are obvious.
I mean, every generation is different, every circumstance is different.
You deal with the things that exist as they are.
Those are interesting things to point out, just as the Lincoln things are interesting to point out, definitely give people some perspective.
I'm glad you called, Sue.
Thanks very much.
Do you see the story out of Cincinnati?
Federal immigration agents and local cops raided an Evondale business on Wednesday, arrested more than 30 people.
The raid happened at IFCO Systems on Evondale Drive in Evondale.
Police say they were looking for illegal immigrants.
Spokesman for Immigrations and Customs Enforcement, or ICE, released this statement.
Today's arrests and detentions are part of an ongoing immigration and customs enforcement work site enforcement investigation.
And because of the enforcement actions are ongoing, we are unable to provide further details at this time.
And then I found headlines about other action being taken by ICE.
And this is incredible.
Let me just read these headlines to you.
Pallet maker targeted in immigration raids.
14 Cubans and 19 Chinese arrested by ICE for illegally entering the U.S. Operators of Baltimore's Kawasaki restaurants plead guilty to harboring, employing illegal aliens and money laundering.
35 illegal aliens arrested following a joint operation between ICE and New Orleans police.
14 charged in Washington state as U.S. Canada dismantled major human smuggling network.
Two employment agencies and nine individuals charged in Washington, D.C. with hiring and harboring illegal aliens, mail fraud, and money laundering.
Leaders of a sham marriage ring in Tacoma, Washington plead guilty to charges stemming from ICE-led probe.
Carrizo Springs, Texas men arrested for illegally transporting illegal aliens.
37 criminals arrested by ICE during week-long operation in South Florida.
Joint task forces created in 10 cities to combat immigration, document, and benefit fraud.
And there are a bunch of others.
Now, what's going on out there, folks?
What do you think is going on?
Well, isn't it rather obvious?
November's going on, and they hear you.
Interesting piece here for tomorrow on Open Line Friday from the Ludwig van Mises Institute.
Where would General Motors be without the United Autoworkers Union?
Yeah, profitable and then some, perhaps, at least closer to it than they are now.
Anyway, folks, it's been great today.
Look forward to Open Line Friday tomorrow.
Export Selection